332:. AFD'ing an article about "my cool boyfriend," or "my cool garageband," or "the local crab eating champion" would be a waste of time and energy. This is why A7 was created. Just because the creator insists upon recreating such does not transform the article into asserting notability. Having to wait 7 days to delete an obviously CSD'able article because of a "construction sign" on it is not a great idea. Not deleting it the same day as the addition of the construction sign just adds to the work load without any benefit. The article creator can always work on the article in his userspace until it asserts notability. And yes, this looks like instruction creep.
22:
81:
53:
145:
67:
181:
369:
I propose a new, "Valid reason for recreating a deleted page"; that the page was deleted without abiding policy or due process. A single person can delete a page, correct? Are we to assume these individuals will always respect policy and not game the system? (I think that some core policies are
407:
to the deleter if necessary. I think a problem for your proposal is that it would be used as an excuse for re-creating properly deleted pages by those who, for instance, disagreed with the decision of an AfD; and it would be up to New Page Patrol to notice that this had happened.
192:
218:
seemed perfectly adequate to me. What additional understanding is created by having a separate page here - a page that most of our readers won't read but that will inevitably drift out of synch with the controlling policy at CSD?
158:
472:
125:
430:
This proposed policy seems unnecessary to me. G4 is clear and concise and generally used very effectively. This proposed policy doesn't improve on G4, it only makes it more complex.--
385:
Yes, an administrator has the ability to delete a page. Hopefully, all administrators know better not to delete any pages without following the guidelines in place.
482:
88:
135:
272:
I'm a bit confused by the speedy delete section, surely any page - recreated or not - is eligible for speedy deletion if it meets any of the
477:
97:
252:
I agree with
Rossami. All this does, sadly, is introduce another place where policies and process may be inconsistently applied.
58:
33:
66:
400:
187:
101:
458:
439:
417:
394:
379:
359:
343:
317:
302:
285:
261:
247:
232:
223:
is a bad thing. We really shouldn't be creating new pages like this unless there is a compelling benefit to them.
154:
238:
I have actually tried to dispute some of these policies myself. Here, I am trying to outline these more clearly.
39:
354:
338:
257:
454:
435:
349:
333:
180:
431:
281:
93:
404:
450:
390:
375:
313:
243:
228:
413:
220:
207:
273:
215:
96:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
277:
466:
299:
386:
371:
309:
239:
224:
409:
253:
144:
80:
52:
403:
for an improperly deleted page, which will get it back and also administer a
308:
I don't know the oversite committee so I'd say no. Are they good people? :)
296:
328:
There is no reason to delay deletion or AFD a page that clearly meets
295:
I proposed that recreation of oversighted material be forbidden. --
92:, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of
329:
175:
15:
143:
449:
Is a category a page? does this article cover categories?
365:
Recreating a page because it was deleted illegitimately
324:
Problems w/ a7 and construction tag, instruction creep
214:
Why is this a separate page? The short paragraph at
473:
Low-impact WikiProject
Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
370:flawed, but that is another can of worms.)
161:on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.
47:
483:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
116:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
49:
7:
21:
19:
190:on 29 February 2016. The result of
38:It is of interest to the following
110:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Essays
100:. For a listing of essays see the
89:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays
14:
86:This page is within the scope of
179:
79:
65:
51:
20:
478:NA-Class Knowledge (XXG) essays
286:16:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
248:17:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
233:16:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
440:20:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
418:12:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
360:21:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
344:21:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
303:21:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
262:19:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
186:This page was nominated for
130:This page has been rated as
395:18:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
380:19:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
318:09:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
113:Template:WikiProject Essays
499:
459:05:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
276:not just the five listed?
151:
129:
74:
46:
274:speedy delete criteria
155:automatically assessed
148:
136:project's impact scale
94:Knowledge (XXG) essays
348:What guess 999 said.
268:Speedy delete section
153:The above rating was
147:
291:Oversighted material
401:WP:Deletion review
149:
34:content assessment
231:
221:Instruction creep
208:Instruction creep
204:
203:
174:
173:
170:
169:
166:
165:
162:
490:
357:
352:
341:
336:
227:
183:
176:
152:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
83:
76:
75:
70:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
498:
497:
493:
492:
491:
489:
488:
487:
463:
462:
447:
428:
367:
355:
350:
339:
334:
326:
293:
270:
212:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
102:essay directory
64:
61:
12:
11:
5:
496:
494:
486:
485:
480:
475:
465:
464:
446:
443:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
366:
363:
325:
322:
321:
320:
292:
289:
269:
266:
265:
264:
250:
211:
205:
202:
201:
193:the discussion
184:
172:
171:
168:
167:
164:
163:
150:
140:
139:
128:
122:
121:
119:
84:
72:
71:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
495:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
470:
468:
461:
460:
456:
452:
445:Category/Page
444:
442:
441:
437:
433:
425:
419:
415:
411:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
364:
362:
361:
358:
353:
346:
345:
342:
337:
331:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
298:
290:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
209:
206:
199:
195:
194:
189:
185:
182:
178:
177:
160:
156:
146:
142:
141:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
451:Becky Sayles
448:
429:
368:
347:
327:
294:
271:
213:
197:
191:
131:
87:
40:WikiProjects
30:project page
29:
467:Categories
132:Low-impact
98:discussion
62:Low‑impact
399:There is
356:cierekim
340:cierekim
278:Guest9999
432:RadioFan
405:WP:TROUT
188:deletion
387:Sebwite
372:Lumenos
310:Lumenos
240:Sebwite
225:Rossami
134:on the
426:Oppose
410:JohnCD
330:CSD#a7
254:Stifle
229:(talk)
216:WP:CSD
157:using
107:Essays
59:Essays
36:scale.
28:This
455:talk
436:talk
414:talk
391:talk
376:talk
351:Dloh
335:Dloh
314:talk
282:talk
258:talk
244:talk
198:Keep
196:was
159:data
297:IRP
126:Low
469::
457:)
438:)
416:)
393:)
378:)
316:)
284:)
260:)
246:)
453:(
434:(
412:(
389:(
374:(
312:(
300:☎
280:(
256:(
242:(
210:?
200:.
138:.
104:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
