Knowledge

talk:Tambayan Philippines/Sources - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

81: 63: 91: 32: 206:
are timebound - things like administration, flora and fauna, hydrology, and trail characteristics change over time. The site itself is aware of this, and provides occasional updates. But the wiki writer should in those cases probably indicate the time-bound nature of the description. Something like "
205:
Pinoymountaineer is broadly reliable as a source regarding the immediately observable characteristics of the mountains covered - the height, the level of difficulty, the trail characteristics, flora and fauna, geography, hydrology, administration, and so on - the only caveat being that some of these
213:
Pinoymountaineer rarely oversteps its bounds, and even things like descriptions of mountaineering sector events, obituaries of mountaineers, and discussions of mountaineering-related policy are generally sound although it is not the ideal source for such things. The main specific problem is that
360:
and related personalities and entities while for other topics, no consensus. Inputs from Chinese Filipino contributors are more than welcome since they're more familiar with the said outlets (assuming that they get their info from them and/or use them as references).
214:
information about things like security (i.e. the presence of local armed groups) and local controversies may not be reliable, but only in the sense that they are written by non-experts who may not have all the facts on-hand. -
281:): either additional considerations or generally unreliable with regards to coverage on Mr. Quiboloy, his organization and connected political and business interests while I'm leaning towards no consensus for other topics. - 434: 429: 208:
Public access to Mount Kabundukan is administered by the Department of Environemnt and Natural Resources, which sets limits on the number of persons admitted to the trail
313:– should be re-evaluated and details/comments must be added if warranted. These do not seem to be 100% neutral, as claimed by the infoboxes of their respective articles. 234:
Would it hurt to put Sonshine and its (former) radio arm DZAR in the GU list? We have extensive evidence about the antics of that so-called "news" outlet, on top of
113: 278: 274: 167: 357: 104: 68: 439: 381:, and various attempts stating it as an unreliable source, I feel like we should develop a consensus regarding the website, what do you think? 17: 343: 303: 151:
Now, that there is a discussion page for Philippine Related sources, I would discuss if pinoymountaineer.com is a RS or not? (
356:
If that were to be the case, their classification can be split: additional considerations with regards to China, Taiwan, the
195: 43: 243: 163: 80: 62: 219: 386: 378: 362: 309: 282: 239: 49: 414: 390: 366: 350: 286: 247: 223: 199: 337: 112:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
215: 191: 159: 96: 403: 383: 298: 410: 331: 235: 423: 396: 187: 180:
I personally think this is a good reliable sources for mountains in the Philippines.
174: 253:
I'm leaning towards splitting the classification for the said outlets - not just
109: 406: 86: 238:
himself being alleged to have done some nasty stuff as well, if anything.
108:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the 279:
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#New York Post Entertainment
318: 152: 326: 321:-related topics (being "pro-Taipei"). Similar approach applies to 265:
network (or what's left of it) plus affiliated republishers like
173:
Gideon Lasco, another author wrote articles/opinion piece for
25: 275:
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#New York Post
166:
and is the UNESCO National Commission Secretary General (
402:
It's clearly a blog, for which they have a disclaimer
158:
Ivan Henares, one of the site's author is (or was) an
8: 317:should be used with caution in dealing with 122:Knowledge:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines 57: 435:NA-importance Philippine-related articles 430:Project-Class Philippine-related articles 125:Template:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines 42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 329:-related topics (being "pro-Beijing"). 59: 273:bureau - into two components (compare 7: 31: 29: 48:It is of interest to the following 18:Knowledge talk:Tambayan Philippines 269:which was created from the former 24: 102:This page is within the scope of 440:WikiProject Philippines articles 105:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines 89: 79: 61: 30: 267:North Central Luzon News Media 1: 271:SMNI News North Central Luzon 116:and see a list of open tasks. 379:a discussion about PeoPlaid 358:ongoing territorial dispute 128:Philippine-related articles 456: 164:Asian Institute of Tourism 415:20:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 391:03:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 367:13:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 351:14:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC) 287:13:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 248:03:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 224:01:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 200:11:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 74: 56: 399:would be a better venue. 261:but also the entire 119:Tambayan Philippines 69:Tambayan Philippines 160:assistant professor 97:Philippines portal 44:content assessment 315:United Daily News 304:United Daily News 293:Two Chinoy dailes 147:Pinoy Mountaineer 144: 143: 140: 139: 136: 135: 447: 389: 349: 348: 210:as of June 2024. 130: 129: 126: 123: 120: 99: 94: 93: 92: 83: 76: 75: 65: 58: 35: 34: 33: 26: 455: 454: 450: 449: 448: 446: 445: 444: 420: 419: 382: 375: 334: 330: 325:in relation to 295: 236:Apollo Quiboloy 232: 149: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 95: 90: 88: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 453: 451: 443: 442: 437: 432: 422: 421: 418: 417: 400: 374: 371: 370: 369: 294: 291: 290: 289: 263:Sonshine Radio 240:Blake Gripling 231: 228: 227: 226: 148: 145: 142: 141: 138: 137: 134: 133: 131: 114:the discussion 101: 100: 84: 72: 71: 66: 54: 53: 47: 36: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 452: 441: 438: 436: 433: 431: 428: 427: 425: 416: 412: 408: 404: 401: 398: 395: 394: 393: 392: 388: 385: 380: 372: 368: 364: 359: 355: 354: 353: 352: 346: 345: 340: 339: 333: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 311: 306: 305: 300: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 229: 225: 221: 217: 216:Chieharumachi 212: 211: 204: 203: 202: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 184: 178: 176: 171: 169: 165: 161: 156: 154: 153:courtesy link 146: 132: 115: 111: 107: 106: 98: 87: 85: 82: 78: 77: 73: 70: 67: 64: 60: 55: 51: 45: 41: 37: 28: 27: 19: 376: 342: 336: 322: 314: 308: 302: 296: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 233: 209: 207: 183:Warm Regards 182: 181: 179: 172: 157: 150: 103: 50:WikiProjects 40:project page 39: 110:Philippines 424:Categories 377:Regarding 344:Contrib's. 332:JWilz12345 323:World News 310:World News 230:SMNI/DZAR? 384:🍗TheNugg 363:Ian Lopez 301:dailes – 283:Ian Lopez 373:PeoPlaid 196:contribs 188:Miminity 177:before. 175:Inquirer 387:eteer🍗 397:WP:RSN 319:Taiwan 299:Chinoy 168:Source 46:scale. 407:Hipal 327:China 277:with 38:This 16:< 411:talk 405:. -- 338:Talk 307:and 297:Two 259:DZAR 257:and 255:SMNI 244:talk 220:talk 192:talk 194:) ( 162:at 426:: 413:) 365:@ 285:@ 246:) 222:) 198:) 186:, 170:) 155:) 409:( 361:- 347:) 341:| 335:( 242:( 218:( 190:( 52::

Index

Knowledge talk:Tambayan Philippines
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Tambayan Philippines
WikiProject icon
Philippines portal
WikiProject Tambayan Philippines
Philippines
the discussion
courtesy link
assistant professor
Asian Institute of Tourism
Source
Inquirer
Miminity
talk
contribs
11:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Chieharumachi
talk
01:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Apollo Quiboloy
Blake Gripling
talk
03:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#New York Post
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#New York Post Entertainment
Ian Lopez
13:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑