Knowledge (XXG) talk:Unreferenced BLP Rescue/Archive 4

3618:

scenario of Knowledge (XXG) declaring a Harvard Professor's bio a BLP risk because it was only sourced to their University website. I think it has been long enough since my last attempt that it is worth broaching the subject again, but there is one awkward issue to face; This has been running for 14 months and there are an unknown number of articles already loaded which would meet the revised criteria, changing the criteria would risk having all of them tagged in one deletion spree, thereby swamping the team who patrol BLPprod. The process is already complex so I wouldn't suggest running two dates at the same time, but we could consider a restart on the expanded criteria, so if we extended the criteria on the 1st August 2011 but changed it to all articles created after the 1st July 2011 we would have a significantly tighter stable door at the price of making a tiny number of overlooked articles slightly harder to delete. I think this would address the most common objections of complexity and starting with a flood, whilst still being acceptable to those who want to tighten the process as a genuine closure of a risky loophole used by some very low grade "articles".

3869:, there are only 288 UBLP articles that were created since the BLPPROD date and not already nominated for deletion. I just randomly picked 10 of them to see why they are UBLPs, but not BLPPRODed. 1 was completely unreferenced (but was an Olympian, so easily referenced), 1 has a faculty external link (but a Russian university), 1 has an ext link to IMDB, 2 have ext links to soccerway or similar reliable football databases, 5 have ext links to their own website, 1 has an ext link to flikr (subject is a photographer), 2 have a bibliography of books (with ISBNs) that they've written and 1 has plenty of refs (but most foreign language) and the back-dated template was on the article when created (ie a cut/paste from another article - probably needs some more investigation as to it's accuracy). The common link is almost all had their "refs" in the External links section, not the References section. Making it clear that 3728:

a harmless article that needs improvement and better sourcing, not deletion. In hindsight we came up with a complex compromise, but I doubt if we'd get consensus to reduce the requirement for removing a valid BLPprod, or to tighten it to the point of ignoring all self published sources when applying BLPs. As for Joe Decker's research I suspect that was looking at the articles tagged as unreferencedBLPs or RefimproveBLPs and that there will be other poorly sourced recent BLPs as yet unidentified; but I'd also point out that if custom and practice have diverged from policy and the instructions that we give to editors then bringing the three inline is itself a worthwhile thing to do. I don't decline BLPprods that are only sourced to Facebook, Myspace, Youtube or LinkedIn, but unless the policy is changed to allow it I certainly wouldn't BLPprod them.

3037:

UBLPs, but we've never tried a direct appeal to other experienced editors. There are plenty of good editors out there who have either helped out in the past or just haven't ever come this way. I was thinking if each of us posted the following message, or a variant of it as you see fit, to talk pages of possibly interested editors (maybe those who took part in the BLPRFCs?) or editors that you "know" from other wiki interactions, we might be able to finish off the remaining 4875 fairly quickly - remember 5000 UBLPs were removed in December. So, here are my ideas for the messages to users and projects. Feel free to use them as is, edit them, or write your own from scratch... but lets see how big a chunk we can take out of the count in June 2011. (And I'll try to update the "by topic"

4023:

a neutral source. I could see an argument for for BLPPROD'ing articles like that, but I'd have far more of a problem with excluding the official university site of a professor, or the official site of a member of a national legislature--the existence of those sites provides some reliability as to at least one claim, something that's probably less true about the guitarist. And I'm not sure it's easy to right a bright-line test to distinguish those cases, even though "I know it when I see it." Such an expansion would likely be harder to get consensus for, I think the community is (rightly) less concerned about hoaxes and promotional BLPs than it is about libel, but promotional, non-neutral BLPs are a real problem for the encyclopedia as well. --

3295:

than the projects that still have a lot to go - The ones that did well were (from memory) Ice Hockey, Metal/Opera music, NFL, Cricket, Spain, Sweden, etc. But, the issue there is that it may not be the project as a whole that was active, just one or two of us. ie, I personally cleaned out Australia, Olympics and some of New Zealand, but am only really a "member" of WP:Australia. Maybe we just have to keep chipping away and accept that we will probably get Jan/Feb/Mar 2010 and maybe the little May 2010 by the 1 year anniversary, which will be all pre-BLPPROD ones done, and the rest will be done by August. Still a great effort... just don't go away again Joe!!!! (only kidding- hope you had a great break!)

3805:

some high risk potentially harmful articles and say they had to be sourced or deleted within 10 days. If it degenerated into simply a way of making articles easier to delete then it would be best to get rid of it. Making articles easier to delete is a disbenefit and something we should only be prepared to do with good reason. I have identified one group of what I believe to be high risk articles that I think BLPprod should be extended to, can anyone else suggest an easily defined group of high risk articles that it would be worth extending BLPprod to, or would anyone care to challenge my description of Myspace, Linkedin, Youtube and Facebook as risky sources?

3773:

unsourced, and I believe we should extend that to articles that are only sourced from sites that accept fake bios. I don't see the same risk from bios sourced from self published sites such as a bio on a university website. So unless someone can explain why such an article is inherently more risky than say a completely unsourced article on a sports team, village, company or dead person then I don't see a case for extending the BLPprod to such articles.

31: 3309:*grin* It was a lovely break, and I should be back in town until mid-July sometime, when y'all'll have to miss me for a week or so, Montana this time. *hand to forehead in mock despair* I think you're probably right about most article creators, I really think the user watchlist stuff wouldn't help much, but really, I'd take another 100-200 if that's all we got, and we might get that, even if only mostly from the most recent months. 3394:). So basically, I think it is wrong to mark an article on a band as an unreferenced BLP (since that is technically incorrect), but people should still handle biographical information in articles on bands with the same degree of care as biographical infomation in actual biographies. As for an article on two brothers, I would probably say it is a biography unless it is more about a group or organization those brothers belong to. 381:- I found a way to get the toolbar back! In your preferences, under the editing tab, there are two checkboxes that are related to beta features. The first is supposed to toggle between the old edit toolbar and the advanced (yuck) edit toolbar. The second relates to some features. Previously, the state of the second checkbox was irrelevant. Now, in order to get the old toolbar back, you need to uncheck both boxes. -- 3827:

identifying all the ones that meet the current BLPPROD criteria is very time consuming and a manual task - and so it doesn't get done for all of them. While there are a number of tools(one of which I'm working on), none of them will ever be 100% accurate. Question, if a list of potentially 'high risk potentially harmful' new articles was created would there be interest in checking it out?Regards,

1619: 1317: 1696:, both of which are useful as the transliteration of the Chinese names varies a bit. No worries if this doesn't appeal to anyone. I'll get to it myself at some point. Haven't posted a message at either WikiProject Baseball (the articles probably need updating as well) or WikiProject Taiwan yet but could do that when I get back later today.-- 1640: 3545:

be fairly vicious with PROD/AFDing ones that you don't get an easy ref, and forcing the "It's a BLP so it needs good, significant, reliable, independent references" line at AFD if it seems to be drifting towards a "keep on good faith" type of approach. Parts of the Music project - namely Metal and Opera have both been really good -

3591:

relevance and hence a reluctant to use the BLPPROD template. In order to be truly effective, BLPPROD clearly needs to disallow those sites as references. There is mounting criticism of the BLPPROD, and if a call for consensus were to be made now, after 14 months of operation, it may have a strong chance of being accepted.

3390:, and myself and everyone else who responded there agreed that BLPPROD doesn't apply to bands. However, while an article on a band isn't actually a BLP, all aspects of the BLP policy except BLPPROD apply to biographical content about living people anywhere on Knowledge (XXG), even outside of articles (see 2047:, he's one of our favourites - an Irish hurler. I am so used to clicking on the google news link and instantly clicking on "archives" that I almost missed the top link - a "where are they now" feature on him that was published yesterday! "Like raaainnn, on your wedding day... Isn't it coincidental". 3643:

However, in looking at the those three hundred just now? I pulled up fifty or so of them, unsystematically. I saw maybe one which would become eligible as a result of excluding your list of four. In several cases the article was sourced only to the self-published source of the article subject (e.g,

3552:

And to be honest, MOST of the topic based tasks have been extremely poor. Unless you get a dedicated editor willing to give it focus, they have all been virtually untouched. Sports & regions have been helped by individual sports/regions - olympics, NFL, Football, hockey, Spain, Sweden, Australia

3527:

Everyone has their own "rules" - true. Sadly that makes hard work because plenty of people will challenge/remove tags etc - and any discussion gets lost in the differece in line in the sand between the tags/processes/policies around what is required to have a BLP. It would be rather useful if at some

567:

to your monobook.js or vector.js as appropriate will get you a cite button. On mine (vector), the cite button is on the left side instead of the right, and the subsequent citation format selector buttons are not properly ligned up, but a proper reference can be generated. Does anybody know what the

4022:

Addressing the question of articles based solely on self-published sources, that's a tricky thing. I certainly don't think that FredFine.com is a great source of reliable information about (say), the hypothetical guitarist Fred Fine, it may be accurate in the main, but it's certainly not going to be

4018:

Quick response to WSC above, yeah, my "research" (you dignify it too much with that label *grin*) is based just at a look at the list of things tagged unreferenced BLP, and it's clear to me that there are still things I'd call unreferenced BLPs that are as yet untagged. I do get the sense that we've

3804:

Nope when I said "a bio sourced to a self published site such as a Professor's page at a university website is a harmless article that needs improvement and better sourcing, not deletion." I was quite serious about the need for improvement and better sourcing. The idea behind BLPprod was to identify

3749:

Seems to be a misunderstanding of primary sources. A self published site such as a Professor's page at a university website is a reliable source so I don't see the problem. Once you have an organisation then the editorial oversight is met. Unlike a myspace or aperson personal website where there is

3727:

The problem of matching the process to the goal is that while we achieved consensus on the process we did not achieve consensus on the goal. For those like me whose goal was to prevent harm to living people, a bio sourced to a self published site such as a Professor's page at a university website is

3678:

Match the BLP PROD process to the BLP goal. i.e That every BLP has at least one reference that directly supports material in the article. From a process point of view the rules to add a BLPPROD want to be the same for removing a BLPPROD, otherwise you get mis-communications and unnessary arguements.

2525:

I'm not going to ask Joe, J04n, Pburka, CharlieD and the other regulars to step up their pace - you guys are doing more than your fair share. I think that we should approach some of the old guard, or admins/experienced editors in general, or maybe do another watchlist notice in mid June, and try to

1508:

are behind various paywalls which makes them, I think, unusable for our purposes. The article itself is a puff piece created by the subject's own company which needs fixing (if it survives). I would have said that it is a possible candidate for deletion on notability grounds but it is also possible

3794:

To be honest I thought in your previous post you where arguing for that bios should be sourced solely from self published sources. The BLPprod criteria sets the bar upon which everything else gets brought down to, maybe not intentionally but in practice. So my advice would be to make them easier to

3544:

There is a database report that shows only 300-400 articles that would qualify for BLPPROD that are tagged with BLP unreferenced, so cleaning up that grey line won't solve much. I think we can only keep slogging through them one at a time and make a call each time, and the only real solution is to

3509:

and onward. I personally support an expansion of the use of BLPPROD to allow placement on articles sourced only from obviously self-published sources (MySpace, LIvejournal, Dreamwidth, Tumblr, Facebook,Twitter, AuthorsBandName.com, and so on.), but I'm not convinced there would be support for that.

3477:

and the relative slowness that it reduces. This slowness in reduction is in part I think due to the contiued addition of new musician articles marked as unsourced. Many musician pages seems to be one time creations(promotional?). I checked all the recent additions and all off them have at least one

3254:

Just back last night, and I'm sorry I'd missed this, but even sorrier it didn't pull in more hands. I do think that there should be ways of getting more folks to contribute to the final push here, but I'm not sure what precisely, the watchlist notice was relatively recent and I'd rather wait until

1558:

Yup. If you can tease some quotes out of the article, it's usable, I've sometimes found that just the blurb from Google search on a paywalled article (if not the abstract at the pay site) is enough to establish some fact about the individual, etc. I use a quote=xxx parameter on the cites in those

156:

Anybody else having problem with their editting toolbar? I use the old editting toolbar rather than the new enhanced editting tool bar as the old one links to the reftools citation templates which can autofill the citation template fields from the source when it can which usually results in a full

3019:

to AfD for a second round, but I don't feel too good about it. There's a lot of non-RS stuff out there to sort though, and I the Urdu language barrier is tall, so there's probably something there that I've missed, at least that's what my gut (and the unanimous keep at the previous AfD) are telling

2541:

It'd sure be cool to manage that! I suspect we're not going to manage a new watchlist notice just yet, but I'd love to think about other ways of getting more hands. I thought about another set of notices to the projects, and it's possible that a notice targeted at a subset of articles might be a

623:

You know, I thought that by leaving the oldest month untouched (February 2009), we'd see some regular downward movement in that months' numbers from the folks that regularly decry old unreferenced BLPs. That doesn't seem to be the case. I haven't kept close track, but I recall it being 431 a few

3294:

I think most article creators from these 2009/early 2010 articles are long gone - or have already been notified and don't care. I only really tried the top 25 projects and Jimbo's talk page - but maybe a more targeted approach of editors we "know" or the projects that have been successful, rather

3617:

I've tried perhaps three times to get consensus to extend the BLPprod by ignoring four specific sites which allow people to freely create profiles: Linkedin, Facebook, MySpace and YouTube. This would close a real loophole which could be used to create hoaxes and worse, but avoid the embarrassing

3590:

Some users and admins insist that "whether reliable or not" means that the MySpacey sites and blogs must be accepted as sources that 'support a statement'. However, empirical research has found that many new page patrollers do not check out the references that are on page for reliability and/or

3496:

It's been discussed a few times before that the lines between BLP unsourced/BLP sources/BLPPROD are not black and white. Is only a myspace/personal website/facebook/discogs/allmusic/mp3/youtube/imdb/university faculty website/club/sporting database OK or not, what about external links vs inline

3036:

I thought it might be worthwhile trying another recruiting notice - but before we do another watchlist one (maybe at the end of the month?), it might be worth a different tack. I've posted messages on noticeboards or project talk pages in the past, and on user talk pages of those who've created

2545:

This seems like a good place to slip in a fact--In terms of article creation date, it's really clear that BLPPROD is keeping the front door closed as we clear out things from the back, Near as I can tell, over 90% of the unsourced BLPs right now were created (not tagged, but created on or before

2521:

Currently there are 900 UBLPs left from 2009. We've been averaging 30-50 per day recently, so it should be done by early June. July 2 will be the 1 year anniversary of this project. There are a further 1662 from the first half of 2010 - ie 2562 UBLPs that were tagged before WP:URBLPR existed.

514:

Thanks for the note. It's pretty clear that the activation of refTools through the gadgets tab in the user preferences got borked when something else was repaired. The import provides an override that basically rams it in the hard way. I'd prefer to the gadgets facility but until this release

3883:

So, whilst I wish that the line between what is or isn't a UBLP was clear, unambiguous and matched BLPPROD, the fact that it isn't, isn't such a big issue - another few months and we'll be down to the final few months and then it's just another maintenance task to be down, not a backlog removal

3860:

Facebook, Youtube and Twitter are sites that some organisations are using officially for news releases and publishing reliable info - obviously I'm not claiming that everything on those sites is reliable, far from it, but I can see the possibility that one day someone will link to an "official"

2079:

Of the remaining few--nearly all of them have some language challenges attached. Yi Chung, the Korean prince, I've requested help from WikiProject Korea from, there are sources at KRWIKI on that Prince but I can't quite connect those sources well enough to use one in our article because of the

1882:

I think it's fine really "factual" biographical data, the thing to be careful about with non-independent sources for verifiability is bias (perhaps in what's not said as much as what is said) and framing, I've seen a lot folks talk about their awards, when they were part of a larger group that

1860:

article) has a profile of her with some biographical information. That isn't an independent source, but I would think it would be reliable. Is there any reason why it shouldn't be used? For that matter, is there any reason why her official page that is given as an external link wouldn't be

1034:

accounts have been made available for Wikipedians, kindly donated by the company and arranged by Erik Möller of the Wikimedia Foundation. We've drawn up some eligibility criteria to direct the accounts to content contributors, and after that it's first-come, first-served. The list will open on

947:

earlier today picking an article from a lengthy "R" list. Did some other stuff and just went back to pick another "R" article and found that most were gone. I though "Crazy mad props to whoever rifled through that!". Then I noticed that "J" list was full of articles when the letter had been

1299:

I know that in the past we've steered clear of the oldest month, thinking natural selection will take care of it, but this case, with it dropping naturally only very slowly, and giving us the opportunity to clear out a whole half year, think it suits. Nice and small, too, after the previous

3826:

Yes, I can see where you are coming from. Two points on that, firstly it's not the consensus view and therefore so far the purpose of the BLPPROD discussion has not been to find the ones the 'high risk potentially harmful articles' - although possibly I could focus on finding them. Secondly,

3772:

No one is arguing that bios should be sourced solely from self published sources, the question here is whether to improve them or to make them easier to delete by extending BLPprod to them. BLPprod exists because there is real potential harm to living people in allowing biographies that are

3654:

Not all BLPPRODs are being executed to the detailed specifications Kudpung and I mention above. Perhaps the other admins have a different understanding of consensus, or are employing some reasonable IAR, I'm not trying to get into a war about what the current consensus really is. I'm simply

1684: 4034:

Thanks Joe, I agree that promotional non-neutral BLPs are a problem, but the difficulty of discussing them in the context of BLPprod is that it tempts some people to think of deletion as the first tool to consider when fixing problems instead of the last option when all else has failed.

3605:

Do you think it's time to start an RfC? For what it's worth, while I enforce what I believe to be the letter of what I understand to be the weird BLPPROD compromise, I would (and in fact at the time fully did) support the exclusion of MySpace et al at nomination time for BLPPROD.

1865:

based on having songs chart and having songs used in notable TV series, I don't think independent sources are needed for showing notability, and I don't think there is any reason non-independent sources can't be used just to verify her biographical information.

967:

Yeah, that would likely explain it. I'd just posted on Village Pump (technical) about the muddleness, but I agree it looks DEFAULTSORTy--although I can't for the life of me how a bug in DS would result in the subsections being out of order. Certainly amusing.

3866: 3504:

For maintenance tagging, yes, there's no consensus on how to use them. For the placement of BLPPRODs, however, there is an explicit statement expressed in the nominating section of the policy document, which is very narrow and relatively well-defined. See

2080:

language trouble, I suspect someone with a bit of Korean would have no trouble bringing him up to "BLP sourced". The three Z's are apparently all related, and might be easily taken out with a single good source if they're really notable. Enjoy! --

1944:, also, it had additional claims, including a #1 U.S. single for a song called "Tenemos Tiempo" which, of course, is also fictional. There were also photos in the article at the time, long since deleted for not having proper permissions stated-- 3164:, bringing the total down from over 50,000 to the current 697 (as of 15:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)). We are now asking for your help in finishing this task. There are two main projects which are devoted to removing UBLPs from en.Knowledge (XXG): 3067:, bringing the total down from over 50,000 to the current 697 (as of 15:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)). We are now asking for your help in finishing this task. There are two main projects which are devoted to removing UBLPs from en.Knowledge (XXG): 3647:

As much as I tend to think that your proposal is a good one, and remembering that I do need to go look at this a bit more systematically, my first look at the data suggests that extending BLPPROD to exclude those four sources wouldn't change

3528:

point the line in the sand for adding tags is the same as the one for removing tags - just for the communications aspect. Anyway, I digress. It seems that in the short term there maybe some clearing by AFD musician whos article does not meet

2043:(I find them much easier than those pesky artists/authors/actors and musicians!) and by now I've clicked on most of them at least once, but for whatever reason moved on without adding a ref (ie they look hard!) Well today I clicked again on 3172: 3085: 3038: 655:

Some progress is definitely being made, but things have slowed down, there's no doubt about that. At some number I think we should start a broader campaign to "eliminate UBLPS" forever -- maybe at around 3 or 5,000, maybe with a one month

157:

citation when pulling from Google Books. Today, I find I got the enhanced toolbar to due to an upgrade glitch, but regardless of my preference setting, and regardless of what I do, I cannot get the old toolbar back. I've reported it at

3639:

Indeed. Moving the creation date bar to keep things from getting even more complex is entirely sensible, only about 300 of the 4300 remaining unref'd BLPs were created *after* March 18, 2010. The BLPPROD as it exists really does make a

1087:

Thanks for pointing that out J04n, I assumed they would have been snapped up in short order so had not put in for an account. The benefit of having access to the additional resources with regard to the work being done here is enormous.

2526:

expand it to 10-20 people doing 3-5 each day, not 3-5 people doing 10-20 each day. Clearing out every UBLP that existed when this project started by the 12 month anniversary will be an awesome achievement... so who's up for it?

2146:

Less of a difference than you'd think, the 7 looks like about 40, the 80 included those at deletion, and there's a mess of 'em. But yeah, a bunch of folks have been ripping through the list the last few days, it's been great!

197:- That's the first thing I tried. I've checked, unchecked, rechecked, unchecked again, in combination with cache bypasses, clearing caches, restarting browsers, and changing browsers (IE8, Chrome, Firefox), all to no avail. -- 3906:, I disagree, it's like a cleanup tag as from a BLP point of view it is poor because it doesn't require a reliable source. Those so called "refs" you refer to can be facebook, myspace and any other link going. Articles in 3879:

is the best tag to use for referenced, but not correctly cited would be one useful task (again, not saying all are acceptable, most are not, but a suitable reference is still a reference even if it's not properly cited

3864:

We are probably down to the last 400 or so UBLP articles that existed when the whole BLPRFC issue happened back at the beginning of 2010. Yes, we've found 4000 "new" UBLPs since then, but counting the articles on

2481:

I used to work at a place where the phrase "crush like bug" was enormously common, and I've always liked the sound of the phrase as a result. :) Smiting is good too, but yeah, it might be a bit much for some.

2373:

Whoops, I just PROD'd that one, I'll keep an eye on it and deprod if there's any sign of possible attention. I hope they come up with something, my eyes are glazing over looking through video and linkfarm sites.

691:

The watchlist reminder was helpful as was the bot that sends reminders to the articles' authors and the Wikiprojects. Perhaps we can redo those? Lot of burnout with this project, I know I've slowed down of late.

672:

I've been tracking the numbers somewhat. As of January 31 there were 440 articles in the February 2009 cat. So it's being picked away at, but not nearly at the pace we saw when the watchlist notice was still up.

2320:

You will note that our momentary drop below 6,000 came with a rebound to over 6,200. The jump was due to Z-bot finding living people marked with the unreferenced tag and upgrading that tag to BLP unreferenced.

1687:

in the UBLP category, if anyone fancies a mostly routine task. Many seem to have been created by the same user back in 2007. Most have links through the zh.wikipedia page to the player's stats page at the

3582:...the process requires that the article contain no sources, whether reliable or not, and in any form (references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography 1773:

seems to be a substantial article about something X-mas related for Elisa. The problem is that the translatio is so bad I'm not quite sure what it says, and I can't tell if this is a reliable source. --

2132:

You guys are amazing! I've contributed very little to this month, due to other commitments, but I'm sure we were looking at 80+ this morning and I get in from work to find we are down to 7? Impressive!.--

1883:

received the award. That sort of nuance sometimes gets lost in primary sources. But for a lot uncontroversial stuff, e.g., birthplace, I think a primary source is the only place you can get the info. --

481:

Tried switching to Monobook, and turning off the advanced editing bar and dialogs. Doing all three got me back to "buttons", but even so, I'm still seeing the cite button. I'd lend y'all mine. :) --

640:

Yeah, I'd noticed the same thing. The overall totals are going down, though, and (I think) faster than our month is, so there's someone else making some progress out there somewhere. I think. :) --

3983:

with no reliable sources. It's easy to make mistakes with the current tagging and processing, not least of which it's not easy to establish or agree on what is or is not a reliable source. Regards,

3255:

we're even closer to ask for that again. I'd thought about the author-talk page notices, but the last I looked the 'bot owner who helped with that hadn't been on line for a while. *ponders* --

1806:

I dug up a name from the history of an active editor who looks like they might have made a content contribution, and left a note on her/his talk page, perhaps we'll get something that way. --

3138:

We understand that everyone has different priorities for their limited time on Knowledge (XXG), so if you are unable to help, that's OK too, but thank you for any assistance you can provide.

3283:

Good idea. I'll give that a shot in a day or two, I just left a note on Tim's user talk page and want to at least give a day or two for him to respond before taking the request elsewhere. --

3478:

link on them, admitely a very low quality one, sometimes the artists personal website, label website, myspace etc. In such cases as have a low quality link should they be marked with the

761: 2103:

I've found a source which confirms those 3 Afghan singers exist and are all related, so I've added that. The four remaining articles that aren't tagged for some sort of deletion are

1373:

I references all of the 'G's but I can't see the individual letters in edit mode in order to cross off the letter 'G' on the main project page - is the template set up correctly? --

708:

I've slowed, too, but only due to real life commitments which have had to take priority with my free time over the last few weeks. I'll be back properly once I'm clear of them.--

1788:

I don't envy you. She obviously exists and the info seems accurate (see www.jpopasia.com/celebrity/elisa/), but I'm stumped on finding anything that meets RS. Yeah for J-Pop! --

3474: 1536:, not free. Just ensure that you include as much information as possible in the citation in case someone wants to look the ref up (at their local library or somesuch) - see 81: 69: 64: 59: 1300:

behemoth! Interesting that despite the joe-excepted burnout, June 09 was still done at a 25ppd average, compared to a 35ppd average for most (but not all) previous months.

1273:

So already we've got the 2009 figure below the 2010 one, and if the watchlisting works as well as it did last time we could end April with fewer 2009 uBLPs than 2011 ones.

3919:

I think you misunderstood me. I have seen articles with reliable references (newspaper articles etc) that are listed in an external links section (no inline) tagged with

3078:, and it is the last month remaining from 2009. The next target is to clear out the first half of 2010 by July 2, which would mark the 1 year anniversary of the project. 791: 3763:

and it seems a primary source also requires a secondary one. So this is exception (of PRIMARY) for BLPs and why a university site bio is by itself not enough. Regards,

158: 442:

Check again? Working for me here--but I use Vector, and Reftools is just different under Vector.. It's definitely crazy-making to not have the cite tools though! --

3579:

the BLP deletion template may be removed only after the biography contains a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article

100:, anyone want to try to find a source before it is sent to AfD? I dropped a line on the removers talkpage but it was his first edit so I'm not holding out much hope. 2062:

Grin, that's awesome! I've been impressed at how often one of those long-lost hurlers get saved by a nostalgia piece, but I've never had timing quite that good! --

3203: 3102: 2642: 2036: 1822: 2040: 1625:

Hey. We didn't discuss a trophy for Feb 2009; I guess because it went by so fast. In honour of the speed at which that was worked through, I suggest this: --

979:

Hmmmm.... And the letters in the categories are out of order, and repeat as well. I'm guessing that there was a software update that didn't work as planned. --

1734:(replace 16 by the player #, which is on most of the pages I've seen) works if the player is still active. In another case, searching on that domain worked. -- 3585:

To be canceled, this process requires the presence of at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the biography.

3337:

I just BLP Prodded about 35 completely unreferenced(with 1 exception) BLPs that where created in the last week. Expect June 2011 to rise for a while. Regards,

3861:

youtube/facebook/twitter account of an otherwise reliable source and get very grumpy when we say linking to XYZorg.com is OK, but facebook.com/XYZorg is not.

3907: 3228:

template. There is no need to log your changes, register or remove the articles from the list. If you need any help, or have any comments, please ask at

3127:

template. There is no need to log your changes, register or remove the articles from the list. If you need any help, or have any comments, please ask at

3659: 428:

for which there is an Encyclopedia of Mexican Politicians. An easy reference addition from Google Books and.... hey! Where did the CITE button go? --

3576:

narrowly missed getting a consensus for being disallowed as references, and the BLPPROD went into operation with these three sentences in the policy:

47: 17: 3679:

A BLP PROD wants to take no more time then an existing PROD, otherwise there is little point in using a BLPPROD because a PROD is quicker. Regards,

3497:

links vs infobox source etc etc. Everyone has their own "rules" as to what is acceptable for each level of tagging and they generally won't budge.

1647:

Looks good. I don't think we did one for June 2009 either... I think this one is appropriate... with an obvious follow up for the current task!

1392:

Yep, but since it only has us list letters that are done, and none had been done yet, it wasn't as obvious what to do next. I fixed it. :) --

3655:

acknowledging that the articles that survive the BLPPROD process today might include fewer borderline cases than one might expect as a result.

1106:

I seem to have access to Credo through my local UK public library card (which I didn't know until now), so don't need to take up this offer.--

3939:

should be used instead. I wasn't suggesting that it is used for any unreliable external links. I often use no footnotes in conjunction with

302: 3376:

Both are marked as Unreference BLPs. It that appropriate? What makes a BLP and can the BLP PROD be applied to bands and similar? Regards,

3189:

is focusing on clearing out the backlog based on the month in which each article was tagged as being unreferenced. The current task is

3074:

is focusing on clearing out the backlog based on the month in which each article was tagged as being unreferenced. The current task is

2194: 1042:

Feel free to add your name even if you're lower on the list than the 400th, in case people ahead of you aren't eligible, and good luck!

1910:

Related/non-independent sources can be used as a last resort for UBLP purposes, but isn't always enough to prove notability at an AFD.

2056: 624:

weeks ago, and its only dropped to 412. Once we clear out June 2009, we'll have the first half of 2009 cleared except for February.--

319:

Wow, no one's ever been envious of me before, and I'm probably the least technically inclined regular contributer to Knowledge (XXG).

175:

Did you try My Preferences → Editing → Beta features → unclick "Enhanced editing toolbar". I'm using monobook and it worked for me. --

213:

My commiserations then because the alternative toolbar is an eyesore; hopefully someone will come up with a fix at VPT. Good luck! --

3190: 3075: 2853: 1570:

Thank you, both. My faulty memory. I thought I had read somewhere that one shouldn't use sources which require a subscription but

2258: 2266: 1993:

95% fake. What puzzles me is that the 'Shantal Méndez' facebook page has got likes. The IP that created this article also created

831:. Searching on Ferdinand "Prinz zu Leiningen" brings up a lot of hits which one could trawl through if these aren't good enough.-- 3644:

FredFine.com for the article on Fred Fine), or that source (usually marked "Official site") plus a few of the links on your list.

1133: 2648:

I nominated this at AfD but there has been no response. Can the BLP Rescue team perhaps find a good reason to keep it? --

568:

correct .js file is for import? My understanding is that the one I used may differ from the one used by the gadget checkbox. --

2262: 1504:

I'm surprised that this is the first time I've encountered this problem: the only possible refs I can find for the article on

787: 2385:

I received a message on my talk page from a member of Wikiproject Albania with the opinion that this person isn't notable. --

1821:. If you are looking for people who can read Japanese to help finding more sources, maybe someone listed as a participant at 547:

Earlier today I thought I lost the 'cite' button but it moved from the far right to the far left, now it's back on the right.

359:

On a tenuously related note - I can't get my watchlist script to work. Anyone else using 'user:js/watchlist.js' by chance? --

2227:

The expired proposed deletions directory is, in my experience, fairly useless, something to do with caching. I work off of

1173:

I've added my voice there, and suggested a wording modification, comments/improvements to the wording might be helpful. --

97: 90: 4019:

taken a significant bite out of the "invisible unreferenceds" in the last year, but that is a difficult thing to measure.

952:

thinking maybe somebody removed the DEFAULTSORT but it still there yet this is being dumped into "J" rather than "R". --

3473:

I'm trying to focus in on some of the associated issues to BLP Rescue. One of the things that crops up is the amount of

1857: 3180: 4042: 3812: 3780: 3735: 3625: 3572:

BLPROD is, in my opinion, greatly underperforming. At the conclusion of the discussions concerning its implementation,

2923: 1442: 1280: 828: 820: 416:- The CITE button has mysteriously diappeared from the toolbar. It was there a moment ago as I had added a source to 2007: 1187:

We've been given three weeks from 8am this morning and the total has already dipped below 9,000. Current totals are:

1068: 1036: 305:. It seems you are not the only one with the problem. And J04n, I am so envious. That did not work for me. :( -- 3973:

that have a reliable source or reliable sources in the external links. Likewise, there will be articles tagged with

3198: 3097: 2930: 38: 1403:

Oh yes, I remember now. It's been a long time since I've completed an entire letter grouping myself. For shame! --

3967: 3923: 3387: 3267: 2405:

Okay, save for Demolli's PROD'd-but-hopefully-still-to-be-rescued state, we're finished with this month. :) --

1711:

I'll keep this in mind for my next "run through a list" task, I've still to finish off the rest of the MEPs. --

1589: 3426: 2944: 794:

but do any of you have any ideas? I've had no luck getting some of these either adequately sourced or deleted.

4062: 4051: 4029: 3987: 3958: 3914: 3893: 3831: 3821: 3799: 3789: 3767: 3754: 3744: 3721: 3683: 3673: 3634: 3612: 3600: 3562: 3536: 3516: 3490: 3460: 3451: 3437: 3412: 3403: 3380: 3351: 3341: 3318: 3304: 3289: 3278: 3261: 3248: 3147: 3050: 3026: 3004: 2989: 2973: 2792: 2781: 2767: 2756: 2698: 2669: 2657: 2633: 2613: 2600: 2585: 2566: 2552: 2535: 2502: 2488: 2476: 2458: 2447: 2428: 2411: 2394: 2380: 2368: 2327: 2289: 2278: 2252: 2241: 2222: 2207: 2184: 2153: 2141: 2127: 2098: 2086: 2068: 2016: 2001: 1986: 1975: 1953: 1919: 1889: 1875: 1847: 1834: 1812: 1801: 1783: 1763: 1740: 1717: 1705: 1667: 1656: 1634: 1601: 1583: 1565: 1553: 1526: 1489: 1475: 1460: 1416: 1398: 1386: 1358: 1340: 1326: 1309: 1289: 1179: 1167: 1147: 1115: 1101: 1082: 1062: 1050: 1013: 999: 988: 974: 961: 928: 913: 898: 883: 860: 840: 805: 773: 755: 732: 717: 703: 686: 665: 650: 633: 595: 577: 558: 542: 524: 509: 491: 476: 452: 437: 406: 390: 372: 345: 330: 314: 296: 280: 260: 242: 226: 206: 188: 170: 143: 128: 111: 3553:

etc being cleared, most of the other topics/regions have only been reduced by this month-by-month clearance.

1067:

Far less than 400 editors have signed up, so even if you don't meet the criteria you can still sign up under

2711: 2351: 1754: 3760: 3233: 3132: 2522:

There are 15+30+2=47 days left until the anniversary... 2562/47 = 54.5. Not much more than our average.

2283:

Hee, it's all good either way, after that last meal I doubt any month will ever look quite so imposing! --

1980:

I'd missed the earlier song names, many of the other song/album names were cleverly generic. Brilliant! --

1331:

February 09 still has some that look reasonably sourceable (and plenty more that don't), so I'd go for it.

816: 4037: 3807: 3795:

delete by extending BLP Prod to cover everything that doesn't have at least one reliable source. Regards,

3775: 3730: 3620: 3481: 3222: 3121: 2562: 2137: 1701: 1579: 1522: 1275: 1111: 894: 836: 3910:

does not meet the criteria of having one reliable source, although it might mask the situation. Regards,

2680:

Since Catscan is still having problems here's a list of the ones still to reference or tag for deletion:

2359:<- I've dropped a note at WikiProject Albania asking for assistance on this Albanian TV presenter. -- 2246:

Okay, the Prince is the only one left. Anyone have any contacts here who can manage a bit of Korean? --

3977: 3933: 3901: 3873: 1693: 3529: 3443:

I think so, yes. It's an old magazine, Google Books is enough to confirm that the 1939 edition exists.

2867: 2685: 2169: 2116: 812: 4060: 4027: 3943: 3671: 3610: 3514: 3316: 3287: 3259: 3024: 2987: 2909: 2790: 2765: 2667: 2583: 2550: 2493:

Let the bugcrushing begin! (And start looking for a crushed bug related photo for the trophy room!)

2486: 2456: 2426: 2409: 2378: 2325: 2287: 2250: 2239: 2182: 2176: 2151: 2096: 2084: 2066: 1984: 1887: 1845: 1810: 1761: 1738: 1715: 1665: 1563: 1473: 1440: 1396: 1336: 1324: 1177: 1060: 997: 972: 926: 911: 881: 753: 730: 648: 507: 489: 450: 343: 141: 3506: 3430: 2874: 2689:- Japanese Wiki entry is also unreferenced - well, i found an ANN link, at least its something.-- 2228: 1931: 1571: 1537: 233:

I also have the new toolbar appearing, even though i'm set up to use all the old editing features.--

2959: 2895: 1731: 944: 3229: 3186: 3128: 3071: 2846: 2663:

Afraid I came to the same conclusion you did, and added my thoughts at the discussion. Cheers, --

1862: 1689: 248: 3954: 3889: 3558: 3399: 3300: 3270:

that someone else does it, I suppose. If we could get something in the Signpost that might help.

3244: 3160:

Since early in 2010, many editors have assisted in the referencing or removal of over 90% of the

3143: 3063:

Since early in 2010, many editors have assisted in the referencing or removal of over 90% of the

3046: 2811: 2531: 2498: 2274: 2190: 2052: 1994: 1915: 1871: 1830: 1818: 1652: 1305: 1043: 769: 425: 3168: 3081: 421: 3596: 2653: 2558: 2133: 1727: 1697: 1575: 1518: 1107: 890: 832: 3574:'MySpace, LIvejournal, Dreamwidth, Tumblr, Facebook,Twitter, AuthorsBandName.com, and so on.' 3211: 3110: 3867:

Knowledge (XXG):Database_reports/Biographies_of_living_people_possibly_eligible_for_deletion

2937: 2916: 2744: 2718: 303:

Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (technical)#Missing on toolbar - Cite button and cite templates

251:

their cache and deselecting it in their preference. Alas, I am not one of those people. --

3391: 3176: 3089: 1514: 1510: 4057: 4024: 3984: 3911: 3828: 3796: 3764: 3751: 3718: 3680: 3668: 3607: 3533: 3511: 3487: 3457: 3434: 3409: 3377: 3348: 3338: 3313: 3284: 3256: 3021: 2984: 2860: 2787: 2762: 2664: 2580: 2547: 2483: 2474: 2453: 2445: 2423: 2422:

I was kinda looking at September 2009, but it's all good, really. What d'y'all think? --

2406: 2375: 2322: 2284: 2247: 2236: 2218: 2203: 2179: 2173: 2148: 2093: 2081: 2063: 1998: 1981: 1973: 1884: 1842: 1807: 1799: 1758: 1735: 1712: 1662: 1560: 1551: 1470: 1437: 1430: 1414: 1393: 1384: 1356: 1332: 1321: 1174: 1165: 1099: 1057: 1031: 994: 969: 919: 904: 874: 746: 723: 713: 684: 641: 593: 540: 500: 482: 474: 443: 402: 370: 336: 276: 224: 186: 134: 3949:

to emphasise that it needs better referencing, and that the links should be moved inline.

3215: 3114: 2452:

The hypnotic power of the phrase "crush like bug" is far too powerful for me to deny. --

1938:

Oh, quite a nice hoax there, joe! An IP editor questioned "is she real" on the talk page

3347:

Done another 12 created in the last few days. They come though thick and fast. Regards,

918:

Fiddling with settings and clearing cache (or time) seem to have restored it. yayz. --

3662:. This isn't perfect, but I believe it's close enough approximation for these purposes. 2902: 2804: 2777: 2390: 2364: 2346: 1779: 1630: 1597: 1455: 1142: 1077: 1009: 984: 957: 855: 800: 698: 582:

My cite button just popped back in again, so you may want to try without the script. --

573: 553: 520: 433: 386: 325: 310: 291: 256: 202: 166: 123: 106: 1533: 1004:

Yay! The entries are properly sorted! Boo! The "R" section is really big again. --

3950: 3885: 3554: 3395: 3296: 3240: 3139: 3042: 2997: 2749: 2725: 2691: 2626: 2593: 2527: 2494: 2356: 2341: 2270: 2108: 2048: 2028: 1946: 1911: 1867: 1826: 1648: 1482: 1301: 949: 765: 658: 626: 235: 3592: 3445: 3272: 3016: 2967: 2832: 2649: 2607: 2165: 2121: 2112: 2010: 1770: 1505: 1618: 161:. I thought I'd share this in case anybody else was having a similar problem. -- 1448:

I suppose August 09 is the most logical choice, it's the only one left with : -->

515:

settles down, importing the script is a decent way to get around the problem. --

117:

My lack of faith in the newbie has been proven wrong, he pointed me to a source!

2881: 2839: 2704: 2463:

I was going to use the word "smite" but I thought it may be too intimidating. --

2044: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3202:

or make your own lists using one of the catscan tools, such as this search for

3101:

or make your own lists using one of the catscan tools, such as this search for

2952: 2825: 2732: 2464: 2435: 2213: 2198: 1963: 1789: 1541: 1404: 1374: 1346: 1155: 1089: 709: 674: 583: 530: 464: 398: 360: 285:

I had the problem this morning but it fixed by just unclicking my preference.

272: 214: 176: 1071:. I'm sure anyone that follows this page could make great use of an account. 3546: 2888: 2818: 2773: 2386: 2360: 1941:

the day the article was created, September 28, 2007. As originally created

1775: 1626: 1593: 1451: 1316: 1138: 1073: 1005: 980: 953: 948:

cleared. And it was because their first name begins with "J". I looked at

851: 796: 722:

Same here, work stuff as well, but that's always on and off with me. :) --

694: 569: 549: 516: 429: 417: 382: 321: 306: 287: 252: 198: 162: 119: 102: 2772:

I was unable to find anything either. A redirect makes the most sense. --

1449:

660. We'll really be able to see the end of the tunnel when it's finished.

1035:

Wednesday, March 23 at 22:00 UTC, and will remain open for seven days. See

824: 1592:

which are guidelines on what not to put in the external links section. --

3363: 2761:

That was all i could manage too, agreed that I'd prefer the redirect. --

2161: 2104: 3963:

I think I understood. Your quite right there willl be some tagged with

3161: 3064: 1861:

reliable for verifying her biographical information? Since she passes

1853: 873:

Not seeing it here at the moment, although I was using it earlier. --

3369: 2337:

We're down to the last few that aren't under some form of deletion:

1639: 1509:

that the stuff behind the paywalls would count towards establishing

3651:

I know of at least two problems with my analysis worth mentioning:

2605:

I suggest July given that it's slightly older and slightly larger.

2739: 1638: 1480:

You guys are crazy! But I'll chip in best i can on that beast.--

3312:

We'll get this sucker wrestled to the ground, I'm sure of it. --

1732:

http://www.brothers.com.tw/player_flypage.php?cate=pl&pno=16

993:

Yeah. Ah well, I'll enjoy the surreality while it lasts. :) --

529:

I've posted yet another note at VPT regarding this new SNAFU. --

3210:

All you have to do is pick your articles and then add suitable

3109:

All you have to do is pick your articles and then add suitable

463:

It just disappeared for me too (using Monobook on Firefox). --

25: 3388:

WT:BLPPROD#Am I correct that BLPPROD does not apply to bands?

1817:

I've added one reference to the article from a news story on

1469:

It would be nice not to have that monster staring at us. --

159:

Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (technical)/Archive 131#Editing

3701:

It's pretty weird that the following recently created BLPs

1532:

Pay-per-view articles are acceptable, refs only have to be

3041:

count later tonight... Dec 4 is a long time ago!) Cheers,

2231:

instead. Also, last I looked, there was (says PRODSUM) a

1757:, and could really use an extra pair of eyes. Thanks. -- 823:, although I have no idea whether they count as RS. Found 745:

Hey, Feb 2011 is taking a 20-article or more dip today. --

247:

Some people have been able to get the old toolbar back by

3386:

BLPPROD does not apply to bands. I asked about that at

271:

Argh! I see what you mean! Where's the Cite icon gone?--

3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 1942: 1939: 497: 3750:

no oversight and it's not a reliable source. Regards,

2747:? I looked the other day and didn't have much luck.-- 903:

Okay, I'll fiddle with my config more then. Thanks! --

1672:

I support the mountain! -- 16:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

1429:

There's only one article left not at deletion, it's

335:

Yeah, I'm not getting the cite pulldowns either. --

3486:? The template documentation implies not. Regards, 2193:has expired, but the article still isn't listed at 2643:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kelcey Brade 2542:new twist that captures people's attention, dunno. 1823:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Japan/Music task force 1056:Note that signups have just opened for these. -- 565:importScript('User:Apoc2400/refToolbarPlus.js'); 3193:, and it is the last month remaining from 2009. 2579:September? July? Something further out? -- 2557:Great idea! Good to have a target to aim at.-- 3239:Thank you for any assistance you can provide. 3191:Category:Unreferenced BLPs from September 2009 3076:Category:Unreferenced BLPs from September 2009 1261:March 2011 490 Total for 2011 1,457 1250:December 2010 191 Total for 2010 3,997 1212:December 2009 265 Total for 2009 3,529 3429:considered a reference so that it can NOT be 3199:Random page in category All unreferenced BLPs 3098:Random page in category All unreferenced BLPs 2948:1 ref added. Changed tag to 'refimproveBLP' 1856:(which I noticed was used as a source in the 8: 1690:Chinese Professional Baseball League website 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Unreferenced BLP Rescue 3908:Category:Articles_lacking_in-text_citations 2434:Or...we could crush December like a bug? -- 1026:400 free Credo Reference accounts available 3658:I approximate creation date by looking at 3183:and you currently have ## articles listed. 1315: 3171:has set up a large number of topic based 3162:Unreferenced Biographies of Living People 3084:has set up a large number of topic based 3065:Unreferenced Biographies of Living People 2035:I'm going through the lists of remaining 1749:Okay, anyone want to take a shot at Elisa 819:(used as refs on the article relating to 788:Ferdinand, Hereditary Prince of Leiningen 3549:I think was instrumental in that work. 3392:WP:BLP#Where BLP does and does not apply 1692:and to a non-RS but informative page at 1617: 2197:. Does anyone know why that is? Cheers 1997:so that could be a hoax also. Regards, 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2026: 1500:Refs only available behind a paywall? 7: 1926:been a while since we have a hoax... 811:For Ferdinand, there are these two: 4056:Yep, agreed. No easy answers! -- 3156:Unreferenced BLPs - the final surge 3059:Unreferenced BLPs - the final surge 2195:Category:Expired proposed deletions 827:used as a ref on the article about 301:Plad2, you may want to chime in at 3175:, which are updated each day by a 3088:, which are updated each day by a 3011:Anyone have eyes for Naseem Vicky? 2092:Oh, and PS: What month next? -- 618:February 2009, unloved, unlovable? 24: 3181:Insert wikiproject list name here 2854:John McCormack (Irish footballer) 889:I've still got the cite button.-- 3717:canNOT be BLP PRODDED. Regards, 1769:Relying on machine translation, 1345:February '09 is fine with me. -- 792:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility 397:Me too. Normality is restored!-- 133:I love it when that happens! -- 29: 1694:Knowledge (XXG) Taiwan Baseball 1436:So, anyway, what next? ;-) -- 1132:I put in a request for another 2212:Nevermind, J04n nuked it. :-) 1679:Anyone for Taiwanese baseball? 1588:You may have been thinking of 1574:is very clear on this point.-- 1037:Knowledge (XXG):Credo accounts 1: 2743:- maybe redirect this one to 2591:September looks good to me!-- 1962:Nom nom nom...hoaxalicious!-- 1685:27 Taiwanese baseball players 929:23:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC) 914:23:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC) 899:23:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC) 884:23:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC) 861:01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC) 841:23:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC) 806:22:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC) 774:01:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 756:22:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC) 733:19:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 718:18:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 704:16:30, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 687:16:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 666:16:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 651:07:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC) 634:21:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC) 596:21:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 578:20:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 559:20:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 543:20:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 525:20:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 510:20:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 492:20:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 477:20:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 453:19:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 438:19:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 407:21:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 391:21:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 373:18:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 346:20:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 331:19:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 315:18:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 297:18:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 281:18:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 261:18:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 243:17:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 227:17:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 207:17:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 189:16:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 171:16:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 144:01:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 129:19:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC) 112:18:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC) 3179:. Your projects list is at 2235:backlog of expired PRODs. -- 1858:Ef: A Fairy Tale of the Two. 424:for deletion, I moved on to 420:using it. After nominating 2924:Tom Walsh (Kilkenny hurler) 2257:Found one... OK, feel like 2178:23:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC) -- 1852:I've also noticed that the 782:Heraldry references anyone? 4089: 3929:, which is plainly wrong. 3667:Interesting. *ponders* -- 3660:a list sorted by ArticleID 3475:Unreferenced musician BLPs 3408:Okay, thank you. Regards, 2931:Willie Walsh (Cork hurler) 1987:05:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1976:02:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1954:02:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1930:What do folks think about 1920:04:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 1890:03:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 1876:22:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1848:22:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1835:22:31, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1813:19:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1802:19:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1784:19:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1764:19:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1417:18:48, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1399:18:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1387:17:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1359:13:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1341:09:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1327:07:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1310:06:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1290:11:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC) 1180:21:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 1168:13:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 1148:12:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 1116:18:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1102:13:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1083:12:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1063:22:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1051:04:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 98:Francisco "O Baby" Rosario 96:The prod was removed from 91:Francisco "O Baby" Rosario 4063:18:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 4052:17:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 4030:17:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3988:16:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3959:16:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3915:14:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3894:13:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3832:13:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3822:12:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3800:12:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3790:11:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3768:10:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3755:09:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3745:07:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 3722:23:55, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3684:23:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3674:22:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3635:21:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3461:19:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3452:18:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3438:18:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3413:19:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3404:01:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3381:00:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3352:17:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 3196:You can also reference a 3095:You can also reference a 1741:15:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 1718:17:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1706:08:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 1668:16:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 1657:13:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 1635:12:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 1602:13:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 1584:06:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 1566:22:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1554:22:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1527:22:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1490:20:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1476:17:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1461:17:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1443:17:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 1014:15:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 1000:20:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 989:20:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 975:20:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 962:20:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 3613:02:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 3601:07:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 3563:15:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 3537:15:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 3517:15:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 3491:11:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 3342:23:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 3319:15:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 3305:17:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 3290:17:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 3279:16:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 3262:15:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 3249:15:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 3148:15:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 3051:15:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 3027:03:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 3005:18:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2990:18:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2974:17:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 2945:David Wilson (violinist) 2793:18:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2782:18:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2768:17:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2757:17:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2699:18:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2670:06:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2658:06:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2634:15:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 2614:08:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 2601:01:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 2586:01:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 2567:06:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 2553:01:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 2536:17:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 2503:07:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2489:03:16, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2477:02:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2459:02:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2448:01:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2429:01:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2412:00:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2395:00:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2381:00:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 2369:21:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 414:aarrrrgggggghhhhhh!!!!!! 3703:Niaz Mohammad Chowdhury 3372:, this is a music band. 3366:, this is two brothers. 2712:Patricia Bermudez-Hizon 2352:Tiago Carneiro da Cunha 2333:October 2009 remainders 2328:17:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2290:07:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 2279:06:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 2253:06:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 2242:00:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 2223:00:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 2208:00:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 2185:23:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 2154:22:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 2142:22:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 2128:18:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 2099:18:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 2087:18:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 2069:16:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 2057:13:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 2017:08:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 2002:01:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 1825:would be able to help. 1755:Elisa (Japanese singer) 1517:. Advice appreciated.-- 1266:Undated articles 28 1258:February 2011 333 1255:January 2011 634 1247:November 2010 334 1244:October 2010 241 1241:September 2010 340 1238:August 2010 337 1235:July 2010 530 1232:June 2010 678 1229:May 2010 211 1226:April 2010 20 1223:March 2010 359 1220:February 2010 358 1217:January 2010 398 1209:October 2009 459 1206:September 2009 504 1203:August 2009 1,425 1200:July 2009 661 1197:June 2009 13 1194:February 2009 202 939:DEFAULTSORT is whacked? 869:Cite button gone again? 3469:Musicians and thoughts 1643: 1622: 790:, I left a message at 3507:WP:BLPPROD#Nominating 3020:me. Have at! :) -- 2160:Jun is down, leaving 2006:No, that one's real: 1726:For players from the 1642: 1621: 1424: 42:of past discussions. 3711:Judith sewell wright 3425:Is the reference on 2983:Finish the year? -- 2316:The 300-article bump 1854:official page for Ef 499:this note go by. -- 2960:Yuhanon Mor Militos 2896:Tim Murphy (hurler) 1270:All articles 8,989 1154:Fingers crossed. -- 945:Alexander Radchenko 2546:March 18, 2010. -- 1819:Anime News Network 1644: 1623: 1190:unreferenced BLPs 426:Francisco Luna Kan 3456:Thanks. Regards, 3032:Recruiting notice 3003: 2868:Shigeharu Matsuda 2755: 2697: 2686:Masahiko Arimachi 2632: 2599: 2221: 2206: 2170:Sharnya Yoshihara 2117:Sharnya Yoshihara 2029:Alanis Morrisette 1995:Margalit Tzan'ani 1952: 1728:Brother Elephants 1661:Nice choices! -- 1488: 1170: 1049: 1030:Another 400 free 923: 908: 878: 750: 727: 664: 645: 632: 504: 486: 447: 340: 241: 138: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4080: 4049: 4045: 4040: 3982: 3976: 3972: 3968:blp unreferenced 3966: 3948: 3942: 3938: 3932: 3928: 3924:blp unreferenced 3922: 3905: 3878: 3872: 3819: 3815: 3810: 3787: 3783: 3778: 3742: 3738: 3733: 3632: 3628: 3623: 3485: 3227: 3221: 3216:reliable sources 3201: 3126: 3120: 3115:reliable sources 3100: 3002: 2938:Stokley Williams 2917:Yuriko Shiratori 2754: 2745:Hey Girl (group) 2719:Madhav Bhattarai 2696: 2631: 2624:and off we go!-- 2598: 2472: 2443: 2217: 2202: 1971: 1951: 1797: 1549: 1487: 1459: 1412: 1382: 1354: 1319: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1163: 1153: 1146: 1134:watchlist notice 1128:Watchlist notice 1097: 1081: 1069:Additional names 1048: 1046: 921: 906: 876: 859: 804: 748: 725: 702: 682: 663: 643: 631: 591: 566: 557: 538: 502: 484: 472: 445: 368: 338: 329: 295: 240: 222: 184: 152:Editting Toolbar 136: 127: 110: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4088: 4087: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4047: 4043: 4038: 3980: 3974: 3970: 3964: 3946: 3940: 3936: 3930: 3926: 3920: 3899: 3876: 3870: 3817: 3813: 3808: 3785: 3781: 3776: 3740: 3736: 3731: 3707:Petteri Kolinen 3630: 3626: 3621: 3593:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3479: 3471: 3427:Kathleen Gibson 3423: 3360: 3335: 3225: 3219: 3218:and remove the 3197: 3158: 3124: 3118: 3117:and remove the 3096: 3061: 3034: 3013: 2981: 2910:Ernesto Piedras 2861:Yoshiaki Manabe 2678: 2650:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2646: 2577: 2519: 2470: 2441: 2420: 2335: 2318: 2077: 2033: 1969: 1928: 1795: 1751: 1681: 1616: 1614:Feb 2009 trophy 1590:WP:LINKSTOAVOID 1547: 1502: 1450: 1431:Omprakash Singh 1427: 1410: 1380: 1371: 1369:Letter template 1352: 1297: 1285: 1281: 1276: 1161: 1137: 1130: 1095: 1072: 1044: 1032:Credo Reference 1028: 941: 871: 850: 795: 784: 693: 680: 620: 589: 564: 548: 536: 470: 366: 320: 286: 220: 182: 154: 118: 101: 94: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4086: 4084: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4020: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3881: 3862: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3757: 3715:Woody Thompson 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3656: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3583: 3580: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3499: 3498: 3470: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3422: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3374: 3373: 3367: 3359: 3358:Are these BLPs 3356: 3355: 3354: 3334: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3310: 3208: 3207: 3194: 3184: 3157: 3154: 3152:For projects: 3107: 3106: 3093: 3079: 3060: 3057: 3033: 3030: 3012: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2995:let's do it!-- 2980: 2977: 2964: 2963: 2956: 2949: 2941: 2934: 2927: 2920: 2913: 2906: 2903:Nishida Tatsuo 2899: 2892: 2885: 2878: 2875:Yoko Matsumoto 2871: 2864: 2857: 2850: 2843: 2836: 2829: 2822: 2815: 2808: 2805:Tudor Gheorghe 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2736: 2729: 2722: 2715: 2708: 2701: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2645: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2543: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2419: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2354: 2349: 2347:Chen Lien-hung 2344: 2334: 2331: 2317: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2210: 2076: 2075:Seven left.... 2073: 2072: 2071: 2032: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1957: 1956: 1932:Shantal Méndez 1927: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1750: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1721: 1720: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1670: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1464: 1463: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1296: 1293: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 940: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 870: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 844: 843: 783: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 669: 668: 637: 636: 619: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 458: 457: 456: 455: 410: 409: 394: 393: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 299: 266: 265: 264: 263: 230: 229: 210: 209: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 93: 88: 85: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4085: 4064: 4061: 4059: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4050: 4046: 4041: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4028: 4026: 4021: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 3989: 3986: 3979: 3969: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3945: 3935: 3925: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3913: 3909: 3903: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3882: 3875: 3868: 3863: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3833: 3830: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3820: 3816: 3811: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3798: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3788: 3784: 3779: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3766: 3762: 3761:WP:BLPPRIMARY 3759:Been reading 3758: 3756: 3753: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3743: 3739: 3734: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3685: 3682: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3672: 3670: 3666: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3652: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3633: 3629: 3624: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3584: 3581: 3578: 3577: 3575: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3550: 3548: 3538: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3518: 3515: 3513: 3508: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3489: 3483: 3482:BLP unsourced 3476: 3468: 3462: 3459: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3436: 3432: 3431:WP:BLPPRODded 3428: 3420: 3414: 3411: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3379: 3371: 3368: 3365: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3350: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3340: 3332: 3320: 3317: 3315: 3311: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3288: 3286: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3260: 3258: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3237: 3235: 3231: 3224: 3223:BLP unsourced 3217: 3213: 3205: 3200: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3163: 3155: 3153: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3136: 3134: 3130: 3123: 3122:BLP unsourced 3116: 3112: 3104: 3099: 3094: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3080: 3077: 3073: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3066: 3058: 3056: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3031: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3023: 3018: 3010: 3006: 3000: 2999: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2978: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2955: 2954: 2950: 2947: 2946: 2942: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2919: 2918: 2914: 2912: 2911: 2907: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2891: 2890: 2886: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2863: 2862: 2858: 2856: 2855: 2851: 2849: 2848: 2844: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2821: 2820: 2816: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2794: 2791: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2752: 2751: 2746: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2728: 2727: 2726:Choi Kyung-ah 2723: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2700: 2694: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2675: 2671: 2668: 2666: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2644: 2641: 2635: 2629: 2628: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2615: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2584: 2582: 2574: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2549: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2523: 2516: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2440: 2439: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2404: 2403: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357:Arian Demolli 2355: 2353: 2350: 2348: 2345: 2343: 2342:Chen Chun-hui 2340: 2339: 2338: 2332: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2324: 2315: 2291: 2288: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2209: 2205: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2189:The PROD for 2188: 2187: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2109:Jun Yamaguchi 2106: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2085: 2083: 2074: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2030: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1955: 1949: 1948: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1933: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1891: 1888: 1886: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841:Thank you! -- 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1756: 1753:I'm stuck on 1748: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1678: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1620: 1613: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1507: 1499: 1491: 1485: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1457: 1453: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1434: 1432: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1378: 1368: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1294: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1271: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1135: 1127: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1047: 1040: 1038: 1033: 1025: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 998: 996: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 978: 977: 976: 973: 971: 966: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 951: 950:Jean Ragnotti 946: 938: 930: 927: 925: 917: 916: 915: 912: 910: 902: 901: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887: 886: 885: 882: 880: 868: 862: 857: 853: 848: 847: 846: 845: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 809: 808: 807: 802: 798: 793: 789: 786:I'm stuck on 781: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 758: 757: 754: 752: 744: 734: 731: 729: 721: 720: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 700: 696: 690: 689: 688: 685: 683: 679: 678: 671: 670: 667: 661: 660: 654: 653: 652: 649: 647: 639: 638: 635: 629: 628: 622: 621: 617: 597: 594: 592: 588: 587: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 562: 561: 560: 555: 551: 546: 545: 544: 541: 539: 535: 534: 528: 527: 526: 522: 518: 513: 512: 511: 508: 506: 498: 495: 494: 493: 490: 488: 480: 479: 478: 475: 473: 469: 468: 462: 461: 460: 459: 454: 451: 449: 441: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 412: 411: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 392: 388: 384: 380: 377: 376: 375: 374: 371: 369: 365: 364: 347: 344: 342: 334: 333: 332: 327: 323: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 298: 293: 289: 284: 283: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 268: 267: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245: 244: 238: 237: 232: 231: 228: 225: 223: 219: 218: 212: 211: 208: 204: 200: 196: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 185: 181: 180: 173: 172: 168: 164: 160: 151: 145: 142: 140: 132: 131: 130: 125: 121: 116: 115: 114: 113: 108: 104: 99: 92: 89: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4036: 3978:No footnotes 3934:No footnotes 3902:No footnotes 3874:No footnotes 3806: 3774: 3729: 3700: 3619: 3573: 3551: 3543: 3472: 3446: 3444: 3424: 3375: 3336: 3273: 3271: 3238: 3209: 3159: 3151: 3137: 3108: 3062: 3054: 3035: 3017:Naseem Vicky 3014: 2996: 2982: 2968: 2966: 2965: 2958: 2951: 2943: 2936: 2929: 2922: 2915: 2908: 2901: 2894: 2887: 2880: 2873: 2866: 2859: 2852: 2847:Yuuko Kohara 2845: 2838: 2833:Shouzou Kaga 2831: 2824: 2817: 2810: 2803: 2748: 2738: 2731: 2724: 2717: 2710: 2703: 2690: 2684: 2679: 2647: 2625: 2608: 2606: 2592: 2578: 2559:CharlieDelta 2524: 2520: 2466: 2465: 2437: 2436: 2421: 2336: 2319: 2232: 2166:Shota Yasuda 2134:CharlieDelta 2122: 2120: 2113:Shota Yasuda 2078: 2037:sportspeople 2034: 2011: 2009: 1965: 1964: 1945: 1929: 1791: 1790: 1752: 1698:CharlieDelta 1682: 1624: 1576:CharlieDelta 1543: 1542: 1519:CharlieDelta 1506:Adrian Fulle 1503: 1481: 1435: 1428: 1425:What's next? 1406: 1405: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1348: 1347: 1298: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1189: 1186: 1157: 1156: 1131: 1108:CharlieDelta 1091: 1090: 1041: 1029: 943:I worked on 942: 891:CharlieDelta 872: 833:CharlieDelta 785: 762:Phil Bridger 676: 675: 657: 625: 585: 584: 532: 531: 466: 465: 413: 378: 362: 361: 358: 249:WP:BYPASSing 234: 216: 215: 194: 178: 177: 174: 155: 95: 75: 43: 37: 3944:BLP sources 3640:difference. 3532:. Regards, 3530:WP:MUSICBIO 3433:? Regards, 3333:BLPPROD run 3055:For users: 2882:Amr Mostafa 2840:Kanchi Kaul 2812:Gamal Hasan 2705:Runar Bauer 2517:A challenge 2263:main course 2261:or another 2191:Daljit Neer 2045:Richie Reid 2041:politicians 36:This is an 4058:joe decker 4025:joe decker 3985:SunCreator 3912:SunCreator 3829:SunCreator 3797:SunCreator 3765:SunCreator 3752:SunCreator 3719:SunCreator 3681:SunCreator 3669:joe decker 3608:joe decker 3534:SunCreator 3512:joe decker 3488:SunCreator 3458:SunCreator 3435:SunCreator 3421:Reference? 3410:SunCreator 3378:SunCreator 3349:SunCreator 3339:SunCreator 3314:joe decker 3285:joe decker 3266:You could 3257:joe decker 3212:references 3111:references 3022:joe decker 3015:Just sent 2985:joe decker 2953:Tom Yasumi 2826:Positive K 2788:joe decker 2763:joe decker 2733:Ronny Cush 2665:joe decker 2581:joe decker 2548:joe decker 2484:joe decker 2454:joe decker 2424:joe decker 2418:What next? 2407:joe decker 2376:joe decker 2323:joe decker 2285:joe decker 2248:joe decker 2237:joe decker 2233:couple day 2229:WP:PRODSUM 2180:joe decker 2174:joe decker 2149:joe decker 2094:joe decker 2082:joe decker 2064:joe decker 1999:SunCreator 1982:joe decker 1885:joe decker 1843:joe decker 1808:joe decker 1759:joe decker 1736:joe decker 1713:joe decker 1683:There are 1663:joe decker 1572:WP:PAYWALL 1561:joe decker 1538:WP:PAYWALL 1534:verifiable 1471:joe decker 1438:joe decker 1394:joe decker 1333:Alzarian16 1322:joe decker 1175:joe decker 1058:joe decker 1045:SlimVirgin 995:joe decker 970:joe decker 821:his father 760:Thank you 3547:User:J04n 3230:WP:URBLPR 3204:musicians 3187:WP:URBLPR 3129:WP:URBLPR 3103:musicians 3072:WP:URBLPR 2889:Ray Munns 2819:Yu Hasebe 2676:Remaining 2467:Jezebel's 2438:Jezebel's 2027:Isn't it 1966:Jezebel's 1863:WP:NMUSIC 1792:Jezebel's 1559:cases. -- 1544:Jezebel's 1456:talk page 1407:Jezebel's 1377:Jezebel's 1349:Jezebel's 1295:Next task 1158:Jezebel's 1143:talk page 1092:Jezebel's 1078:talk page 856:talk page 801:talk page 699:talk page 677:Jezebel's 586:Jezebel's 554:talk page 533:Jezebel's 496:Just saw 467:Jezebel's 422:Chieu Luu 418:Ged Lynch 363:Jezebel's 326:talk page 292:talk page 217:Jezebel's 179:Jezebel's 124:talk page 107:talk page 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4048:Chequers 3951:The-Pope 3886:The-Pope 3818:Chequers 3786:Chequers 3741:Chequers 3631:Chequers 3555:The-Pope 3396:Calathan 3364:Gaitanes 3297:The-Pope 3241:The-Pope 3234:WT:URBLP 3169:WP:URBLP 3140:The-Pope 3133:WT:URBLP 3082:WP:URBLP 3043:The-Pope 2998:Milowent 2979:Next.... 2786:Done. -- 2750:Milowent 2692:Milowent 2627:Milowent 2594:Milowent 2528:The-Pope 2495:The-Pope 2271:The-Pope 2162:Yi Chung 2105:Yi Chung 2049:The-Pope 1947:Milowent 1912:The-Pope 1868:Calathan 1827:Calathan 1649:The-Pope 1483:Milowent 1302:The-Pope 1286:Chequers 924:e decker 909:e decker 879:e decker 829:his wife 766:The-Pope 751:e decker 728:e decker 659:Milowent 646:e decker 627:Milowent 505:e decker 487:e decker 448:e decker 341:e decker 236:Milowent 139:e decker 3880:inline. 3447:Hut 8.5 3274:Hut 8.5 3268:request 2969:Hut 8.5 2609:Hut 8.5 2265:- or a 2123:Hut 8.5 2012:Hut 8.5 1513:and/or 656:goal.-- 563:Adding 39:archive 3898:About 3177:WP:BOT 2267:supper 1515:WP:ENT 1511:WP:GNG 849:thanks 4044:Spiel 3884:task. 3814:Spiel 3782:Spiel 3737:Spiel 3648:much. 3627:Spiel 3214:from 3173:lists 3113:from 3086:lists 2740:Da Ya 2575:Next? 2471:Ponyo 2442:Ponyo 2259:snack 2219:BØRK! 2214:Tooga 2204:BØRK! 2199:Tooga 1970:Ponyo 1796:Ponyo 1548:Ponyo 1411:Ponyo 1381:Ponyo 1353:Ponyo 1282:Spiel 1162:Ponyo 1096:Ponyo 813:this 710:Plad2 681:Ponyo 590:Ponyo 537:Ponyo 471:Ponyo 399:Plad2 367:Ponyo 273:Plad2 221:Ponyo 195:Reply 183:Ponyo 16:< 4039:Ϣere 3955:talk 3890:talk 3809:Ϣere 3777:Ϣere 3732:Ϣere 3622:Ϣere 3597:talk 3559:talk 3400:talk 3301:talk 3245:talk 3144:talk 3135:. 3047:talk 3039:list 2778:talk 2774:Whpq 2654:talk 2563:talk 2532:talk 2499:talk 2391:talk 2387:Whpq 2365:talk 2361:Whpq 2275:talk 2168:and 2138:talk 2115:and 2053:talk 2039:and 1916:talk 1872:talk 1831:talk 1780:talk 1776:Whpq 1771:this 1702:talk 1653:talk 1631:talk 1627:Whpq 1598:talk 1594:Whpq 1580:talk 1540:. -- 1523:talk 1452:J04n 1337:talk 1306:talk 1277:Ϣere 1139:J04n 1112:talk 1074:J04n 1010:talk 1006:Whpq 985:talk 981:Whpq 958:talk 954:Whpq 895:talk 852:J04n 837:talk 825:this 817:this 815:and 797:J04n 770:talk 714:talk 695:J04n 574:talk 570:Whpq 550:J04n 521:talk 517:Whpq 434:talk 430:Whpq 403:talk 387:talk 383:Whpq 379:Joy! 322:J04n 311:talk 307:Whpq 288:J04n 277:talk 257:talk 253:Whpq 203:talk 199:Whpq 167:talk 163:Whpq 120:J04n 103:J04n 3370:Egó 3232:or 3131:or 3090:bot 3981:}} 3975:{{ 3971:}} 3965:{{ 3957:) 3947:}} 3941:{{ 3937:}} 3931:{{ 3927:}} 3921:{{ 3904:}} 3900:{{ 3892:) 3877:}} 3871:{{ 3606:-- 3599:) 3561:) 3510:-- 3484:}} 3480:{{ 3402:) 3303:) 3247:) 3236:. 3226:}} 3220:{{ 3146:) 3125:}} 3119:{{ 3049:) 3001:• 2780:) 2753:• 2695:• 2656:) 2630:• 2597:• 2565:) 2534:) 2501:) 2482:-- 2393:) 2374:-- 2367:) 2321:-- 2277:) 2269:? 2216:- 2201:- 2172:-- 2164:, 2147:-- 2140:) 2119:. 2111:, 2107:, 2055:) 1950:• 1934:? 1918:) 1874:) 1833:) 1782:) 1730:, 1704:) 1655:) 1633:) 1600:) 1582:) 1525:) 1486:• 1433:. 1339:) 1320:-- 1308:) 1136:. 1114:) 1088:-- 1039:. 1012:) 987:) 968:-- 960:) 897:) 839:) 772:) 764:! 716:) 673:-- 662:• 630:• 576:) 523:) 436:) 405:) 389:) 313:) 279:) 259:) 239:• 205:) 169:) 3953:( 3888:( 3713:, 3709:, 3705:, 3595:( 3557:( 3398:( 3299:( 3243:( 3206:. 3142:( 3105:. 3092:. 3045:( 2776:( 2652:( 2561:( 2530:( 2497:( 2389:( 2363:( 2273:( 2136:( 2051:( 2031:. 1914:( 1870:( 1829:( 1778:( 1700:( 1651:( 1629:( 1596:( 1578:( 1521:( 1458:) 1454:( 1335:( 1304:( 1145:) 1141:( 1110:( 1080:) 1076:( 1008:( 983:( 956:( 922:⚛ 920:j 907:⚛ 905:j 893:( 877:⚛ 875:j 858:) 854:( 835:( 803:) 799:( 768:( 749:⚛ 747:j 726:⚛ 724:j 712:( 701:) 697:( 644:⚛ 642:j 572:( 556:) 552:( 519:( 503:⚛ 501:j 485:⚛ 483:j 446:⚛ 444:j 432:( 401:( 385:( 339:⚛ 337:j 328:) 324:( 309:( 294:) 290:( 275:( 255:( 201:( 165:( 137:⚛ 135:j 126:) 122:( 109:) 105:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:Unreferenced BLP Rescue/Archive 4 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index