2315:
Geelong (50/1004) 5.10 Hawthorn (44/838) 5.11 Kangaroos (50/919) 5.12 Melbourne (55/1239) 5.13 Port
Adelaide (34/85) 5.14 Richmond (43/1057) 5.15 St Kilda (95/1506) 5.16 Sydney/South Melbourne (68/1333) 5.17 University (10/112) 5.18 West Coast (53/165) 5.19 Western Bulldogs (67/918) Incredibly the old rivals Essendon, Collingwood and Richmond have used 1055, 1056 and 1057 players respectively (although it must be said that Richmond joined the comp 11 years later) - and Carlton isn't too far off this number either. What is unbelievable is that less successful clubs like South and St Kilda are at 1333 and 1506 respectively. It just goes to show that stable clubs enable stable lists which win premierships (or perhaps premierships encourage stable lists). Can I ask for a definition of "players used" - does it merely include those who have ever played a game or those who have ever been on an official playing list. It would seem to me that if it is the latter, that does not strike me as being very encyclopediac, and surely we should expect a minimum standard before they have an article written about them. To conclude, congrats on Collingwood (Lonie from 50 I presume), the Saints and South for leading the current player article premiership stakes, but watch out for them doggies snapping at your heals! (as they have done throughout their existence - which can be rightly read a number of ways).
2728:
some of the older clubs in the BARFL and DAFL that may have won a few premierships, names that are actually known to many footy followers in
Australia - is there something really wrong with writing about that? Also, aussie rules is the national code of Nauru - so why shouldn't its older clubs get a bit of a write up if necessary? Wouldn't it appear a touch condascending to say to them: "you can't talk about your own clubs, but you can mention your league"? Aussie rules also has a reasonably long history in PNG and has been played in New Zealand as a minor sport for 100 years. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me that you might be able to find an aussie rules club in New Zealand that is even older than any soccer club in Italy. Lastly, it is well documented that aussie rules was played as a minor sport in both Scotland and South Africa around 1900 before dieing out (only to be reborn in the latter country more recently, under very different circumstances). Let us also not forget that two Japanese born players are currently trialling with Essendon, and when people say that only 5-10 AFL/VFL players have been born overseas - I would submit to them that they are out by a very large margin.
1576:. This would be more specific, as the total content at the end of the season is going to be huge enough as it is. Also I think it is more consistent with other annual event articles to put the year at the start of the name. With the content itself, I would personally prefer the details of the round's games to be in a table format as opposed to subheadings with commentary, as that would be much neater and concise. After the entire season is over, if the current method is kept, the article will be detractingly enormous. The commentary thats on there so far is POV material that isnt really suitable for encyclopedia articles, maybe it should be replaced with a link to an external news article which could give the reader an in-depth commentary without us having to write it or cause any POV issues.
2629:, which goes through the related history of all the football codes, and puts aussie rules in its rightful historical context (i.e. right up there in terms of age and historical firsts). There has been a concerted effort over the last few months by some rugby diehards to completely downplay this history. On the talk page, link above, there is a poll underway at the moment, to change the descriptor of the section on aussie rules from Australian to Victorian. I know it is too idiotic to be true, but only weight of numbers will crush this idiocy once and for all. Please make an effort to visit the page and to disagree with this absurd poll. Ignoring it because it is just too stupid will simply mean that it will continue for a long time. This is the wording of the poll:
2106:, who played 66 games for Footscray, also played 3 tests for Australia (in cricket). There is already a cricketing article on him, with all the cricketing templates, etc. which is fair enough. We'll come across this sort of thing at least a few times for each of the older clubs - one can't say it was common, but it certainly was not a rare event, particularly pre-1970 (i.e. VFL players also playing cricket to sheffield shield standard and beyond). My view is that since we are talking about the same person, it all has to be included within the one article. Perhaps we simply add our templates below the cricketing ones? Especially since in most cases an article on the player, especially if he is a test cricketer, will already exist.
2903:(well the list is absolutely massive) didn't exist - there were around 30-40 player articles. Now there are upwards of 1,000, and I would estimate I've started around 60-70% of those, if not more (not to mention my setting up of this project, which has given AFL on this site a sense of direction). I'm not bragging here, merely showing the state of things on here. It's very obvious though that ALOT more needs to be done, and the best way is to tell everyone you know who might be interested in footy to get on board and share their knowledge and/or skills. BTW, an easy way to get player photos without copyright is to take your digital camera to the footy... I'll leave it there,
2762:) clubs. There must be a point where some of these cross the treshold of notability and warrant an article. Regarding Nauru, whose national footy code is aussie rules and has been for decades, if they have any footy clubs that trace their history to the establishment of the code in Nauru, then it warrants an article. We can't have a blanket rule that says an aussie rules club from overseas can't have an article about it because it is from overseas. Do we write articles about soccer clubs in Australia and New Zealand? (remembering that soccer is the 4th ranked football code in Australia). Who, outside of a handful of people in Australia, would know anything about
2088:
There are thousands of respected news articles about the AFL every year that you can link to in a references section, not to mention all the other sources of verified information on the web. In my opinion its worth taking the extra step to spend a little bit of time finding real sources for information you already personally know is true, because then it increases the credibility of all the articles in the AFL project, and in
Knowledge. People will value all these AFL articles if they are credible, not because theres a large quantity of it.
2341:, who were listed but never played a game. This looks to have been resolved now. But yeah, it's only for players who have played 1 game or more with that club. Finally, the Dons have fallen away a bit haven't they? At one stage we were leading the pack with 40-odd players but Lonie has shot the Pies up from about 50-odd players when he came, to about 100 now. Great effort. As for my contributions, the reason the Bombers aren't on top is because I write profiles for every single club, no bias from me whatsoever :)
1332:- should be all lower case after "Australian". I reckon it would be best if we all invoked this practice - it would soon become a habit for those of us doing lots of these sorts of articles. Regarding when we should or shouldn't take the name of a player off the project page - where it is a stubby stub - I reckon it might be best to leave it there to alert people that this one needs a bit more done to it before we take if off the list - what do you all think?
1124:. There are 35 players listed under that category, meaning 35 players have profiles that have started. On the project page, we fill in that 35 profiles have been started, out of the 1004 players in total to have represented Geelong FC since 1897. On the project page, there is no need for players that are already under the category to be listed there, it should simply be used to put up articles for player pages that dont yet exist. Sorry for the confusion mate
31:
2713:, on the grounds that the performance and competition level is not of first-class standard, although the leagues in themselves are of interest. At the time I wrote a rather large discussion, indicating that the AfD could be a litmus-test or precedent for similar AFL teams and I would like to see what people think about this, as to I (or someone else) should go ahead and merge them, without sending a whole pile to AfD.
2866:
pictures. They must be getting the permission somehow. Anyone would think Soccer and Rugby are much more popular due to all the time and effort put into their site and hardly any on the AFL sites. I say get behind ALL yteams and help build AFL up on this wikipedia. It makes it look like a small sport compared to soccer federation and nrl and Afl had more money and is more popular than both of them. --
2758:
have been well organised competitions for at least 15 years, and some of the clubs are known even to
Australians. This isn't a principle just for oversease aussie rules clubs - its for all sports clubs across the world. I have seen a similar debate in it.wiki discussing amateur level soccer clubs. The same debate could be had for suburban aussie rules (or league or soccer or lacrosse or
2687:, etc. I took the ordering of the teams for each match in the order on the AFL website reports, assuming they were in order of home vs away, but it doesnt appear to be the case after I look carefully at it. So... for the meantime I have named the headings 'Team 1' and 'Team 2', which isnt ideal, but if anyone wants to fix that up then feel free :)
1804:
it is ruining this whole site. If this site wants facts only, then maybe they should just link each player article to a webpage with that player's stats, because that's about as factual as it will be if this persists. Oh, and to top it off, maybe they would insert their name and date of birth. Bingo, an article.
1689:
should be restricted to the first 2 subsets - league players and current listed players yet to debut. Everyone agree? Next we probably start to tidy up the
Category:XXXX_coaches as well. Should each team have it's own category as a subcat of Australian rules coaches? It's a bit each way at the moment.
1951:"obvious class, athleticism and uncanny goal sense" or "perhaps more tragically for the team than anyone else". This site is meant to stick to facts, and if you think that ruins it, then you haven't understood the point of the site. I don't think this has to make the articles useless, though - look at
2543:
I share Remy B's concerns about the relevance of the weight of players. It makes a limited amount of sense in a club's team list for a season, let alone in an article about the player's whole career/life. Having said that, if a value being missing from a lot of articles is a problem, it's possible to
2533:
I think the 'Height/Weight {{{heightweight}}}' text that is now in most player articles looks pretty ridiculous. The height and weight of the player isnt even really much of a concern, unless they are notably tall or short, and then it can be in the article text. As for weight, that can change at any
2331:
Yeah I noticed the same thing when I originally put those lists up re, particularly the Saints having a massive number of players. They were always the weakest club, therefore it would have been easier to get a game for them is my logic. Anyway to get the lists up, what I did was went over to RLeague
2033:
We've been able to add a bit of colour and interest to the article while dealing only with known facts (we all know he was called "superboot") - just to show that it is possible to make a footy article interesting. By the way, The
Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers is an excellent reference, if you can
1430:
I think we should name it Portal:Australian rules football instead of just AFL, because it would involve explaining the actual sport rather than just the main league. Also, not sure if we have any real "featured articles" in Aussie rules/AFL (there are plenty of stubs on players, for example). But by
731:
was my idea because i thought it was quite pointless to have an individual article on each position when really they can only just make up one decent article altogether! Those individual articles should really be deleted because really they're useless and I wouldn't have a clue how to delete articles
3179:
I see it as a portal for the sport. Being a player in the amateurs who is more interested in local footy than the "AFL" I think it is a great idea. Gives lesser leagues the recognition and exposure they deserve. The AFL is not the be all and end all of
Australian Rules. What about those who live
2008:
C'mon everyone - JPD is right - let's stick to wikipedia conventions and try and churn out the best stuff possible. There was a similar discusion on the
Australian noticeboard. There is certainly a consensus that if you have rock solid references, you can be a bit more descriptive about a player's
1907:
Nothing personal, but you want people to contribute, to write good articles for the site, yet you set in place all this rules (most of which are reasonable and understandable, I don't dispute that) which restrict us from writing nothing but: Chris Judd is the captain of the West Coast Eagles, he has
1803:
But now apparently you cannot write a decent article anymore. This site wants expansion, wants involvement, in fact it promotes involvement, yet they rub out half of it. I understand if it's unncessary crap half the time, but this 'strictness' involving writing only articles with concrete 'facts' in
1699:
One of the problems arising with this is that there could have been hundreds more players who never played a senior game through the early 20th century for
Victorian clubs which makes the task of tallying players a little harder. I still think that currently listed players yet to play a game deserve
1688:
is now split into "Every Player Ever Played" (in order of debut), "Listed players yet to play a senior game" and "Delisted
Players who did not play a senior game". Each club may adjust these headings as appropriate (ie add "significant reserve grade players" etc). I think the Category:XXXX_players
1101:
This is a project page, to help co-ordinate the creation of new articles (as well as improvement of old ones, I guess). The numbers show how many are already complete, and then the lists give some examples of what needs doing. If you want to know what is already done, then you can look at things lke
264:
I know you're not getting a whole lot of support with this, Roger, but this is by far the best setup for a sports WikiProject I've ever seen. You've clearly set out all the work that needs doing and tied them in with useful resources in a way that I could only dream of getting set up for netball. :)
2757:
I think what you are saying is a reasonable starting point, but then eventually it is possible for a league to pass a certain threshold where the clubs may be considered sufficiently notable. The US and Canadian leagues may not yet be there - but the BARFL and DAFL may almost be there because they
1349:
On the subject of initials, I am using the Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers as my main source (which I am referencing as I go) - so if they show an initial or middle name, I am using it (helps against too much disambiguation) - but if they show a nickname in quotation marks - I won't include that in
690:
Something seems to have happened to the infobox template, there's a bunch of info missing because i believe someone well-meaning has gone around and tried to put a 'captains' section in them. Is there anyone who can fiz this, and maybe accomodate captains as well? Apologies if this has already been
240:
has spent a great deal of time an effort uploading lots of AFL nosource/nocopyright images to wikipeda. I've left a couple of messages on his talk page about this but have had no response. Most of the images are copyvio's, they'll be deleted soon enough, if he reads this he needs to get in touch
2865:
When you loooks at the soccer teams, virtually all listed players have a short bio. They should list all the players on the site for the teams and give them a short bio (it's not too hard, just read they player site on their site and it'll give their stats). Also there are more Rugby league player
2794:
on the grounds of sporting merit, but of course in the cases you mentioned, they are different to the "general case" in that they have historical and wide community impact (if a club has 10,000 kids participating it is possibly notable even if none of them are even high school standard) which sets
2743:
I can see that dozens of AFL players were not Australian born, but they all learn their football and football culture in Australia. With respect to the teams not being notable, but the league being notable - it is similar to a school article noting that it consistently tops the examination tables;
1974:
I understand that and I agree with you. I understand the neccessity to include NPOV in articles, but I'm annoyed in how Harro has gone about removing the sections. It seems he's just looked at an article, saw a few phrases that were questionable, and then deleted the massive surrounding segment of
1950:
I don't want to comment how much should or should not be removed from articles, or alternatively modified, but it is worth noting that encyclopaedia articles are not meant to be written the same way as newspaper articles, or footy magazine profiles, or anything like that. We can't use phrases like
1895:
Not my problem if no one is up to writing Stynes up. As for Hawkins himself, why does it matter whether or not he hasn't been drafted or not? He's a person, and a rather particular one at that for any Geelong fan. Look at the NBA for example. You've got alot of undrafted guys with profiles up (see
955:
Can somebody give me brief explanation on what this article is to be about? I've got more than enough information to write about the all-time goalkicking record, though I'm a bit unsure if it should be just a list of all the people who broke it, a biography page on the history of it or a list that
3132:
Well, the portal is like a main entry point for those new to the sport. It will have links to the project, terminology used in Aussie rules, rules of the game, clubs in the AFL, other leagues, etc. Much different to the project page, which is basically a listing of all tasks that need to be done.
2976:
sliat_1981 here. But these people from the Rugby are obviously getting the permission somewhere. There must be a way. Also, it's strange to have more information on the soccer federation when it just in it's infancy to have not nearly as much on the game which has existed much much longer. Just a
2727:
I would like people to consider that there is a definite difference between comps like the BARFL and the DAFL that have been around for 15 years or so, and other overseas comps that are just starting out or are simply a means for people to have a bit of a kick around the park. So when we talk of
1852:
Unfortunately, as nice as it may be to talk about how good a player was in their under-12 team, or discuss when they once had 12 kicks and 7 handballs against the Kangaroos in a losing match, that has nothing to do with an encyclopedia. I have had to wholly cut back your articles, and delete your
2999:
for their own use isn't bad enough, they are trying to illegally appropriate the official name of our hall of fame - the name actually being owned by the AFL. Let's get off our backsides and make sure we do everything we can to protect our home grown code - no one else will protect it for you!
2336:
runs that site - great resource) and copied the player list for every club into Excel. I then checked the end of the columns to see how many players each club had. The list on Rleague only had players who had played 1 game or more - which is why there was a bit of confusion when docker_dave made
2314:
It's interesting having a look at these stats which I have copied from the main page below: 5.1 Adelaide (61/145) 5.2 Brisbane Bears (26/143) 5.3 Brisbane Lions (34/89) 5.4 Carlton (48/1088) 5.5 Collingwood (99/1056) 5.6 Essendon (52/1055) 5.7 Fitzroy (32/1157) 5.8 Fremantle (53/145) 5.9
2087:
I agree with what JPD has said - this has to be an encyclopedia, not a commentary. But I dont think thats as much of a problem for content as has been claimed. If there is something non-trivial that you want to write about, it would have to be extremely obscure for there to be no sources for it.
2845:
I see Knowledge as a tool for documenting the history of these clubs. Afterall, many do not have websites and should at least have their date of formation and where they are based somewhere. It is fair enough to merge them into the USAFL article and I have added this basic information to that
2795:
them apart from the NC Tigers, who are most probably a bunch of expats kicking a ball in a public park. As for the BARFL and such, although it is not well known, the teams can become notable, if their alumni/players graduate to the AFL for instance. I think, eg, if I were to start an article on
3036:
club(s) he played for. As he was born in 1881, I would presume he played league football from about 1900 to 1910. If anyone has the time and resources to find out who he played for, I'd be extremely grateful (if anyone in Adelaide wants to find out, there is a booklet in the Mortlock Library
851:
I always hesitate from dissecting large articles like this because so many people have obviously put effort into it. In this case it really needs an overhaul, but if others were willing to accept that then I guess I could give it a go. It might have to be done in spurts though due to the time
2030:
He was a prodigious kick of the football which earned him the nickname "superboot". He regularly featured in the World of Sport kicking competions (a sports program which was popular in Melbourne for three decades) and is reported to have once kicked a goal from the wing at the Whitten Oval,
1350:
the title, but I will include that in the opening sentence - I think that is a fairly normal convention. Now here is a curiosity for you all, who would have believed that there have been two players officially called Peter J. Welsh - so for the moment I am calling the Footscary one
1090:
Pardon my ignorance, but I would have assumed that this page refers to guys who are done, that is, we have 'whatever number' out of 1004 guys done, and that we're 'whatever percent' complete on all Geelong profiles (assuming the aim of this project is to profile all players).
2034:
get your hands on it, it will be hard for anyone to attack your articles if you are citing it as a reference. Let's not dispair - there is a shitload of material out there waiting for us to turn into pithy, factually solid, informative (and mildly entertaining) articles!
1523:
since it is rare for him to actually have a crack at goal from inside 50 :-) It looks fantastic and serves as a great example for the rest of us, especially since we are likely to fill up the ones we do with far better news than you are likely to! Carn the scraggers!!
2825:
I was being cheeky about Melbourne Victory (afterall, this is the AFL project page, no non AFL people are reading, right?) - everything you say is reasonable (I am still struggling to understand how they beat Sydney 5-0, definitely warrants a stewards' enquiry).
434:
These are just many requested players that I think we should document on the site. As you can see I've deleted them from the list as the articles have been made (around 95% by me, I might add!). Check out Resources on WP:AFL to see where you can get stats from.
3180:
overseas, or live in places like the Tasmania, NT and ACT where there isn't an AFL club and like myself don't really follow or are interested in following an AFL club. If the AFL were to dissapear, people would still play and watch the sport of Aussie Rules.--
2468:
I agree that this info goes better in the infobox than in the main article, and need only every be mentioned there, unless there is something interesting or quirky about it that needs to be emphasised. I am happy to back through my articles and fix up.
2930:
Sliat1981, you are right, the AFL project is a long way from any form of completion. I personally expect progress will pick up once the AFL season begins in the next week or two. I look forward to when we can boast blue links in the order of this:
3122:
Yeah I have no idea what the portal does that the project doesnt. It just seems to be something confusing which splits everything up into two different areas, so inevitably people will miss things when they only go to one of the two pages.
3031:
I am currently writing an article on the former Premier of South Australia, Lionel Hill. In one biography of him it mentions that he was a champion Australian Rules footballer who represented South Australia but does not mentioned which
1225:. Any ideas anyone? I thought it was worth discussing now rather than after we have done 10,000 players. I also take the opportunity to congratulate Rogerthat again, and good work everyone - this is what I call a project worth doing!
3106:
At the risk of sounding like a dunce, I don't quite understand this portal idea (in the wikipedia context, I obviously know what a portal is generally speaking). For instance, what does it achieve over and above the AFL project page?
3022:
sliat_1981 here:There is a difference from renaming soccer football, thats one thing. But now to say we can't call Aussie Rules football now because Football is taken? I didn't know Football Federation owned the Australian dictionary.
2744:
however, the individual students which are responsible for this are not really notable. I'm not saying we can't have information on the actual clubs - simply putting the paragraph under a listing of the national league is totally fine.
743:
I agree about having one article describing all positions, but before the old individual position articles are deleted, the players articles etc. that wikilink to the individual articles need to be modified. e.g. the separate page,
2789:
is a team competing at first-class level with 10,000 spectators a week, with players who have competed at other notable first-class teams as well as international level. About the blanket rule, it applies to things similar to the
1589:
as possible otherwise it's going to be this one massive article with reports on every single god-damn game which is not what we want. Only the significant stuff. So for now I think the pre-season article should say something like
91:
suggests in general avoiding categorising an article in both a category and it's subcategory. For this reason, footballers should only be categorised by the clubs they played for, and not also included in the broader category.
1704:. If they are delisted without playing a game, simply take them off the list. That's how I see it. As for the coaches category, I think that category is yet to be organised properly. I believe there should be no coaches under
1205:
create a disambiguity page, which also means mucking around with the title of the existing article (occasionally the name already exists under a disambiguity page, which makes life easier, we just add our name to the list);
2523:
It's a good idea to have this information in the infobox but this now means that nearly 400 articles now have {{heightweight}} in their infobox. Is there going to be a concerted effort to have these missing values entered?
1200:
But what I really wish to query is the fact that by adding thousands of names to en.wiki we are going to come across many instances where the name is already taken and there exists a substantial article. The choices are:
2253:
All fixed pippu, take a look at the changes I made to the boxes (there was nothing under "dead" - the value there should either be "alive" or "dead", and also coach should have "coach" or "notcoach" next to it). Cheers,
351:, which is an AFL fan forum. I think by contacting the administrators and asking them to promote this project on that forum in some way we could potentially recruit a wide range of people for this project. Thoughts?
2670:
issues that will naturally arise from commentary-style Knowledge articles. I have named it with the year at the front to be consisent with most annual (or longer interval) sporting event articles on Knowledge, eg.
2162:
A good guideline on whether the AFL or cricket templates should go on top or below would be the amount of matches, fame and influence he had on the game. This issue would probably have to be discussed with the
1799:
So I try to write up good, decent articles. Articles that give any random reader the sufficient amount of info on the players they're looking up, without sounding like a biased, one-sided, lavishing idiot.
2229:
Agreed to all the above - excellent idea Rogerthat. On a different subject, I'm having a problem with a red link appearing to the infobox template in funny spots - don't know how to get rid of it - see
2301:
2248:
1534:
79:
71:
66:
3117:
2044:
2019:
1364:
1342:
1323:
2836:
2776:
2738:
2479:
1406:
With Portals being one of the two main Wiki-crazes currently (other being userboxes), I believe its time to make one for AFL. If you are interested in helping me make it please comment below.
2116:
2593:
Never mind, I just made it optional. Where there is no heightweight parameter, the infobox skips that row. So that should leave all of those pages without heightweight appear unaffected.--
1821:
article where I've added all the stuff that unbelievably, has been deleted from the article. Alot of that information clearly belongs in the article and the more people we get involved in
1959:. These articles are fairly informative, aren't they? A fair amount of the Chris Judd information should probably be in the article, but it needs to be written in the appropriate style.
1796:
When I first came to this site, I thought of nothing more but helping expand it. And what better way to do so then by expanding this great sport, particularly the great club of Geelong.
114:
I think it needs to be removed from each page individually. I haven't considered it a particularly urgent matter, and so have only removed it from pages that I have been editing anyway.
3010:
1676:
To avoid the confusion as to what players belong where, I propose the following: For each team have we should have 2 lists and a category for our players. ie for Freo, we have the
1059:
so there's no need for them here. The % quoted on this page refers to the players that are completed under that category. If I didn't answer your question properly, please clarify.
997:
965:
220:
2492:, I came across the height mentioned in many articles and thought it should only be included in an infobox since it is sort of generic information (although still useful to know).
2706:
280:
2666:
article using a table format for the games. This keeps the article clean, simple and every game has a link to a full report from the AFL website. I think this should avoid any
2122:
Yeah, if its the same person then it definitely needs to be within the same article. Just add the AFL infobox below the cricket one and merge your text into the cricket stuff.
47:
17:
1235:
2992:
2650:
2606:
is now no longer displaying a heightweight value when it should. I'll leave the infobox as it is for now (as it's doing no real harm) but I'll investigate it further later.--
763:
Anyone know where I can dig 'em up without having been a member of the club in question (or, preferably, leaving Adelaide)? An anon's added some extremely dubious details to
327:
298:
2325:
2891:
If you think the quality is poor now, you should have seen the AFL coverage when I stumbled upon wikipedia in late October of last year. Articles on such greats as
795:
1749:
Well the season is underway and I think it would be a good time if anyone wants to take their digital camera to the upcoming games. We need photos of players like
833:
is far from a good article. It's a notable topic as far as Australian sport goes, but it needs a major cleanup to reach respectable standards like Knowledge 1.0.
2368:
Also pippu I should add you're doing a brilliant job with the Doggies players - I like the way you've referenced players skill levels from the Record, top idea.
3184:
3127:
2819:
2752:
2514:
2363:
2276:
2126:
2073:
1892:
How does Tom Hawkins get a bigger article than Jim Stynes? That's ridiculous. It's entirely up to whoever wants to write an article for that particular player.
1561:
1391:
1245:
2799:, this should stand, even though nobody refers to it as such (aside from maybe a few swimming commentators and websites), because it has produced the likes of
1209:
simply put a line in italics at the start of the existing article explaining that if you are looking for Tom Jones the australian rules footballer, look here.
2191:
1684:
and Category:Fremantle_Dockers_players. The WP:AFL list should have EVERY player ever on a Freo list, whether rookie and delisted, or 200 game player. The
714:
3160:
Portals are meant to be easy access pages for both editors and readers (ie. people who don't edit but use Knowledge). The project page is just for editors.
1286:
because there is a conflict going on with soccer being called Australian football. Finally, let me just say good job there Joey (if I can call you that ;))
602:
should not also be in the partent category Australian Rules footballers. To put this into practice, we would need to remove the category from the template.
1586:
2167:
guys. Perhaps a merged template can be made? There is a sufficient number of people who played in both sports before professional Aussie rules emgerged.
2413:
to see the changes I've made - I have added Height/Weight as a column for the infobox which means every infobox is currently out of whack (except for
1154:
Ok, I've got it under control now. The changes make it much more easier to understand. Though, does my Jimmy Bartel article really need to be expanded?
3033:
3037:
listing all the players to have played for South Australia; I'd do it myself but I'm some thousands of kilometres away from Adelaide). Cheers. --
2710:
1685:
1681:
1761:;). My camera died a week ago (lucky it's under warranty) so I'll be out of action in terms of photos, but I hope everyone here can carry on here.
653:
Ive added TV Broadcasters and Melbourne Radio and National Austereo through Triple M, I Dont know outside of victoria so please if you do add them
135:
For clarification, is this WikiProject intended to focus solely on the professional League, or is it also for wider Australian Rules articles? eg.
3259:
3041:
1709:
1539:
Good work Lonie, if you keep this up we might have to give out a "WikiProject AFL Contrbiutor of the Month" award - In fact that's a good idea :)
1329:
178:
202:
is proposed for deletion. It looks like if the article is not a hoax, then this wikiproject should be supporting the article. if it is a hoax,
2051:
Some of that material is the info in the Judd article, which is clearly usable but needs to be discussed and improved, not just chucked away.
728:
706:
1354:- the other one having played for Hawthorn, and incredibly the careers may have crossed for two or three years in the late 70s/early 80s.
1045:
If the players aren't created, then why name them as such? I've checked each of them up, and I've only put up the ones that have profiles.
791:
1908:
won a Brownlow Medal. Well, blow me over, I've come looking for some info on who this Judd-bloke is and that's all I've got. Brilliant.
794:, which is looking to identify quality articles in Knowledge for future publication on CD or paper. We recently began assessing using
505:
There's already a section on TV commentators/personalities. But feel free to expand the sections and narrow it down to what you like.
387:
148:
1975:
the article. So much of that information is useful, but it seems Harro is too lazy to really rectify it and bring it up to standard.
1459:
2562:
Making it optional sounds like a good idea, although I have no idea which bit of the IAC box refers to making something optional...
1197:
Completing the list of bulldogs players I realise I occasionally transgress what is discussed above - I'll fix that up shortly.
3271:
2988:
948:
302:
3288:
3241:
3209:
3170:
3155:
3100:
3059:
2966:
2939:
2925:
2850:
2721:
2691:
2610:
2597:
2584:
2557:
2538:
2528:
2463:
2439:
2390:
2216:
2185:
2157:
2092:
1997:
1968:
1942:
1912:
1883:
1847:
1811:
1783:
1738:
1693:
1661:
1626:
1580:
1513:
1488:
1453:
1424:
1308:
1186:
1158:
1146:
1111:
1095:
1081:
1049:
1032:
990:
928:
895:
878:, or use any subpages that like in the main article space. If you want to make a draft new version, move it to your user space (
869:
856:
846:
837:
824:
806:
780:
752:
736:
721:
695:
683:
673:
657:
640:
611:
592:
518:
509:
499:
478:
457:
448:
439:
428:
413:
399:
365:
355:
334:
309:
291:
269:
254:
245:
227:
209:
189:
164:
155:
121:
108:
99:
3226:
3140:
3085:
2910:
2882:
2569:
2499:
2424:
2375:
2348:
2261:
2201:
2142:
2058:
1982:
1927:
1832:
1768:
1723:
1646:
1546:
1506:
1473:
1438:
1376:
1293:
1171:
1131:
1066:
1017:
975:
802:, with no POV or copyright problems. Can you recommend any suitable articles? Please post your suggestions here. Thanks a lot!
571:
2995:- remembering that it has been part of yet another acrimonious debate with the round ball brigade. If appropriating the term
1275:
879:
2945:
913:
875:
862:
2766:, who have been around for barely a year, and whose main claim to fame is that it is on the verge of bankruptcy already.
883:
633:
531:
453:
I went to that site listed under "Resources" and checked the number of all the players listed for each club (using Excel).
3253:
2680:
1121:
1056:
3078:. I have added some initial modifications and was wondering everyone's thoughts on it (take it to the Portal talk page).
1861:
have been left in your trail as you have been writing. For example, how does a plpayer who hasn't been drafted yet (see
1701:
1705:
3075:
2545:
2407:
1632:
1283:
1213:
So far so good, but should we agree a standard for setting apart the names of our players. I have seen, for example,
1222:
599:
558:
2287:
Thanks! I get the picture now. Hey, I'm Sicilian, you have to explain things 3 or 4 times before it sinks into my
1164:
Yeah I think someone just added Bartel assuming there wasn't an article on him...he should be removed from the list
1817:
I know where you're coming from mate, I've seen your work and you do a great job. Check the discussion page of the
830:
813:
250:
Yes, thanks. I went and actually took some photos of my own then uploaded. Just wish others would do the same. --
38:
1328:
I just want to add that I think Rogerthat's suggestion is probably the way to go (even if it is a mouthful), i.e.
1241:
I have come across the same problem... and I have been creating mine with (Australian Footballer) after the name.
1055:
The players listed here should be ones that don't already have profiles. You can see the ones that are started at
717:, etc.). Is one favoured over the other? To which should other articles (player articles, for example) be linked?
679:
Not at all mate, I put in the wrong infobox template. Cheers for bringing it to my attention, it should work now.
553:
547:
2607:
2594:
2525:
1615:
1573:
1259:
817:
775:
144:
1250:
Yeah the rule I've been going by is to create a disambig page whenever the person isn't notable and having, say
1217:
which I find a little unsatisfactory. Mainly because the time may come when the clash is with a name famous in
2796:
1713:
1636:
1351:
1255:
621:
88:
2944:
Speaking of lists, I think there is not a list of footballers for Aussie Rules. I saw many for other codes in
3112:
3005:
2831:
2771:
2733:
2645:
2474:
2320:
2296:
2243:
2111:
2039:
2014:
1529:
1359:
1337:
1318:
1267:
1230:
968:. Perhaps a listing of all players to have kicked more than 500 goals (or set the bar wherever appropriate).
2932:
2684:
1619:
1599:
1595:
625:
589:
315:
284:
2633:
That the section featuring games that are descended from Victorian Rules and Gaelic Rules should be headed
629:
1603:
598:
According to my understanding of the Categorisation policy, all the players who are in categories such as
542:
535:
2878:
3056:
2816:
2791:
2749:
2718:
2702:
1920:
Disappointing response Harro, you've convinced me Boomtish, more evidence of this site becoming a joke.
1607:
764:
406:
186:
865:. Dont expect you to do much of it, just that i've got holidays and have plenty of spare time. Cheers,
585:
380:
3108:
3001:
2827:
2767:
2729:
2641:
2470:
2316:
2292:
2239:
2107:
2035:
2010:
1525:
1355:
1333:
1314:
1226:
1087:
I'm afraid you've lost me on logic. The list of players here are guys who haven't been done/profiled?
3267:
2870:
1677:
768:
692:
3201:
footy tipping competition software for our company. Or any websites which host. Can anyone help? --
2874:
1278:. hope that made sense, but that's how I see it. Also, if I know the middle names of players, I use
1242:
842:
I didn't mean that they were good articles. How bout us two plus anyone else started to clean it up
3238:
3152:
3097:
3052:
3048:
2922:
2812:
2745:
2714:
2581:
2511:
2436:
2387:
2360:
2273:
2213:
2154:
2070:
1994:
1939:
1873:
1844:
1780:
1735:
1658:
1558:
1520:
1485:
1450:
1388:
1305:
1214:
1183:
1143:
1078:
1029:
987:
654:
515:
496:
803:
3206:
3070:
I'm sure some of you participating in WP:AFL would have seen the notice on the front page, where
2676:
1510:
925:
495:
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to add a section on television and radio brodcasters?
1505:
article is up and running, but what about the club articles on the season. I have just updated
445:
425:
306:
266:
3167:
2963:
2786:
2782:
2763:
2460:
2182:
1901:
1858:
1622:
are currently competing in the quarter-final stage of the competition." or something similar.
1421:
224:
152:
136:
386:
to label articles related to the AFL. COuld someone make, or propose on the relevant page at
2489:
1879:
1279:
745:
718:
395:
182:
104:
OK, so how can the Australian Rules footballers category be removed from each players page?
444:
Sorry, I wasn't very clear - I meant the total numbers of players in the clubs' histories.
3263:
2672:
2603:
2485:
2414:
1502:
749:
319:
206:
2808:
1758:
996:
The page is up. If you're satisfied with how I've set it up I'll start a celanup on the
514:
Ok Just to be clear I meant on Television stations and radio stations that brodcast AFL
463:
3231:
3145:
3090:
3071:
3038:
2915:
2667:
2574:
2504:
2429:
2380:
2353:
2266:
2235:
2206:
2164:
2147:
2063:
2025:
1987:
1932:
1854:
1837:
1773:
1728:
1651:
1611:
1591:
1551:
1478:
1463:
1443:
1381:
1298:
1251:
1176:
1136:
1071:
1022:
980:
908:
680:
637:
506:
454:
436:
410:
352:
331:
161:
105:
3284:
3221:
3202:
3181:
3135:
3080:
2905:
2900:
2847:
2619:
2564:
2553:
2494:
2419:
2370:
2343:
2256:
2196:
2137:
2053:
1977:
1964:
1922:
1909:
1827:
1822:
1808:
1763:
1718:
1690:
1641:
1623:
1541:
1468:
1433:
1371:
1369:
Sounds good pippu. Now what's the bet both Peter Welsh's middle names were James? ;)
1288:
1166:
1155:
1126:
1107:
1092:
1061:
1046:
1012:
1001:
970:
957:
918:
903:
891:
866:
843:
821:
733:
607:
471:
362:
118:
96:
1904:). So, in going with your rich vein of consistency, why not go delete those people?
3161:
2949:
2804:
2800:
2663:
2656:
2446:
2168:
2132:
2103:
1569:
1407:
799:
710:
223:. (I realise, not technically AFL, but I am sure people here might be interested.)
3256:
page? It looks awful as everything is shoved to the right after the player lists.
2102:
As I get towards the end of completing my list of Bullies players, I noticed that
1282:
instead of Chris Johnson (Australian rules footballer). I don't think you can use
3124:
2936:
2688:
2535:
2338:
2333:
2123:
2089:
1956:
1952:
1870:
1577:
853:
834:
820:
NEED to be included. I would also like to see all of the club's articles on it.
475:
391:
251:
237:
221:
Knowledge:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_November_20#Australian_rules_football
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2987:
speaking of more needing to be done - why aren't more voting in favour of the
2896:
2709:
by myself, with the result being to merge the team to its respective league -
2231:
1866:
1818:
1754:
1750:
1271:
1263:
670:
242:
199:
861:
Yer that's kool. Havent started it yet, but we can edit it to how we like at
462:
Checked them against other sources? If not, it's a good idea.. the basis for
2892:
1431:
all means, tell us your thoughts mate and we'll see what we can do. Cheers,
1218:
3197:
The season proper is almost upon us I've been asked to find some good and
3280:
2996:
2626:
2549:
1960:
1897:
1825:
and the article, the more informed and sharper the player pages will be.
1103:
887:
603:
288:
115:
93:
3219:
competition looks pretty good. Probably the best of the web-based ones.
2417:). Does everyone think this is unneccessary or is it a worthy addition?
901:
Sure. Delete that article then. Got the idea from the Futurama page :-P
2785:
is perhaps an indication of your inclination towards AFL :) ?? Because
2484:
The height or weight might only be notable to mention for someone like
323:
140:
767:
citing one and I'm having a hard time finding them so I can check... ~
667:
I may be a stupid newbie but is it me or does this template not work?
2759:
1274:
that plays soccer that is listed as (footballer), then I just use
534:
is getting unwieldy. How would it be if we created a subcategory
1568:
I would personally suggest having the current article split into
886:). It's definitely a good idea to clean that article up, though!
301:, as that seems to be the format used by most other sports (i.e.
348:
1313:
that was my footy club name - I hope I haven't blown my cover!
3216:
2977:
trick to make overseas visitors think it's our national game.
2625:
I'm not sure if you are all familiar with the generic article
1631:
I think we could also set up the article in the vein of this:
25:
3279:
I fixed it by ending the table in the player's list section.
2935:, but its going to take a lot of people a lot of work to do.
2635:"Games descended from Victorian (Australia) and Gaelic Rules"
1466:
as a basis for it but obviously it will look much different.
709:
and also individual articles for many of the positions (eg:
812:
Umm well sees no one has replied to this, I would say that
1266:, I'd include a link in italics at the top of the page to
467:
620:
I've sorted the players by teams into leagues, so we got
1585:
I think we need to make it look as similar to the other
160:
This is solely for the AFL (formerly known as the VFL).
3051:
is just 100m away! Do you have a name for it? Regards,
1862:
318:
actually refers to more than one team, for example the
219:
Please comment on this Categories for renaming debate:
177:
I don't see any reason why this can't be a sub-page of
1509:
and it is looking very very good. Please take note ;)
998:
list of AFL players to have played more than 300 games
966:
List of AFL players to have played more than 300 games
2707:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/North Carolina Tigers
281:
New Zealand (Australian rules football National Team)
241:
so that he hasn't wasted his time doing this. Cheers
18:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Australian rules football
2993:
Knowledge:Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight
424:Where did the lists of players come from for this?
361:Sounds like a good idea, did you contact the site?
328:
New Zealand national Australian rules football team
299:
New Zealand national Australian rules football team
1753:(a joke that there's no photo for the great man),
1639:- check out all the links to match reviews there.
470:- but crosschecking was too formidable a task, so
1708:, that should just contain subcategories such as
1462:. Feel free to fix things up yourself. I've used
3047:I can do this. My office in the physics dept at
1680:list (effectively a work in progress list), the
1460:User:Rogerthat/Portal:Australian_rules_football
1102:the Category pages in the encyclopedia proper.
798:, and we are looking for A-class, B-class, and
550:(to contain every AFL player sorted by surname)
283:and decide whether it should be moved. Perhaps
2031:Footscray (a distance approaching 100 metres).
2534:given time if a player bulks up or whatever.
390:, a stub to use for AFL player bios? Thanks.
215:Capitalisation of "Australian Rules Football"
8:
2192:List of Australian rules and cricket players
715:Ruckman (Australian rules football position)
1458:OK I will be working on the Portal here -
205:the participants here should know that. --
3034:South Australian National Football League
1678:WikiProject_AFL#Fremantle__.2849.2F145.29
2711:United States Australian Football League
1686:List of Fremantle Dockers league players
1682:List of Fremantle Dockers league players
1276:Ron Howard (Australian rules footballer)
880:User:Jasrocks/Australian Football League
1710:Category:Adelaide Football Club coaches
1330:Fred Cook (Australian rules footballer)
275:Move New Zealand National Team article?
1221:. I have started using, for example,
876:Australian Football League/New article
863:Australian Football League/New article
786:Articles for the Knowledge 1.0 project
181:. This is done with cycling already.--
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1789:Is it worth writing articles anymore?
884:Talk:Australian Football League/Draft
729:Football (Australian rules) positions
707:Football (Australian rules) positions
634:Category:Australian Rules footballers
532:Category:Australian Rules footballers
527:Category:Australian Rules footballers
7:
3076:Portal for Australian rules football
1041:Why change back the Geelong section?
792:Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
705:I've noticed that there exists both
2640:Thanking you all in anticipation.
1254:as the disambig page with links to
279:Could people please take a look at
1702:Category:Fremantle Dockers players
1010:Yep it looks good mate. Good work
727:Sorry if I confused you mate, the
388:Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting
149:Category:Australian rules football
24:
2544:make the parameter optional. See
1865:) get a longer article than say,
1706:Category:Australian Rules coaches
2989:Australian Football Hall of Fame
2546:Template:Infobox Australian City
1757:, and well, anyone really, even
1284:Ron Howard (Australian football)
949:AFL All-time Goalkicking records
303:New Zealand national soccer team
29:
3026:
1672:Standardisation of Player Lists
1223:Fred Cook (Australian football)
732:so if someone wouldn't mind...
600:Category:Adelaide Crows players
572:Category:Brownlow Medal winners
559:Category:Adelaide Crows players
2946:Category:Lists of sportspeople
2135:for an example of what I did.
1004:08:40, February 6, 2006 (UTC)
538:, and broke it up as follows:
287:might be more appropriate. ==
1:
3252:Would someone please fix the
3027:Lionel Hill's football career
2811:in the last decade. Regards,
2681:2005-06 Indian cricket season
1739:10:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1694:05:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1662:10:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
1627:06:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
1581:13:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
1562:05:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
1535:03:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
1514:01:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
1489:11:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1454:07:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
1425:05:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
1392:01:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
1365:09:54, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1343:09:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1324:07:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1309:06:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1246:02:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1236:21:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
1122:Category:Geelong Cats players
1057:Category:Geelong Cats players
960:00:30 February 4, 2006 (UTC)
874:Please don't put anything at
748:, has 28 pages linking to it.
658:05:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
612:15:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
593:12:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
519:13:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
510:13:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
500:08:42, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
479:15:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
458:12:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
449:12:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
440:12:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
429:07:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
414:08:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
409:, I hope that's acceptable?,
400:22:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
356:11:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
335:09:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
310:06:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
292:05:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
270:05:10, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
246:15:46, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
228:05:02, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
179:WikiProject Australian sports
173:WikiProject Australian sports
165:08:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
2098:Another interesting question
1187:08:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
1159:05:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
1147:09:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
1112:10:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
1096:10:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
1082:12:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
1050:10:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
1033:12:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
991:00:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
956:ranks the top goalkickers.
829:My personal opinion is that
807:17:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
781:07:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
753:00:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
737:11:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
554:Category:AFL players by team
548:Category:AFL players by name
347:I came across a site called
210:01:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
190:12:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
156:05:07, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
122:14:05, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
109:09:56, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
100:08:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
1633:2005_English_cricket_season
1574:2006 AFL Premiership Season
1260:John Beveridge (footballer)
722:05:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
684:02:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
674:12:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
641:01:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
3305:
3242:22:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3210:09:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3185:01:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
3156:22:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3128:11:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3118:11:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3101:08:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3060:05:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
3042:08:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
3011:05:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
2967:09:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
2940:10:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2926:09:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2851:01:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
2837:07:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2820:06:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2777:06:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2753:06:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2739:06:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2722:02:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
2692:16:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
2651:22:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
2611:06:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
2598:06:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
2585:00:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
2558:19:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2539:12:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2529:10:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2515:03:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2480:03:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2464:01:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2440:01:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
2391:08:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
2364:08:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
2337:profiles for players like
2326:03:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
882:) or maybe the Talk page (
831:Australian Football League
814:Australian Football League
466:used data that used to be
297:I'd personally move it to
255:01:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
147:, and the other things in
3289:08:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
3171:12:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
2302:12:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
2277:09:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
2249:02:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
2217:04:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
2186:01:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
2158:01:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
2127:12:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
2117:12:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
2093:12:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
2074:08:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
2045:12:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
2020:12:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1998:08:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
1969:12:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1943:10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1913:09:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1884:07:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1848:06:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1812:05:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1784:12:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
1352:Peter J. Welsh (Bulldogs)
1256:John Beveridge (gardener)
964:Something in the vein of
818:Australian rules football
366:11:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
145:Victorian Football League
2797:Commercial Swimming Club
2024:This is what I added to
1853:copyvio images, as both
1714:Category:VFL/AFL players
1519:Shouldn't you be called
929:10:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
896:09:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
870:09:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
857:09:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
847:08:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
838:08:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
825:08:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
790:Hi, I'm a member of the
696:11:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
622:Category:VFL/AFL players
233:User:Biatch & Images
131:AFL or Australian Rules?
89:Knowledge:Categorization
2933:List of Test cricketers
2781:Your comment regarding
2685:2006 Commonwealth Games
1793:I'm not so sure it is.
1270:. If there's already a
1268:Ron Howard (footballer)
3193:Footy tipping software
626:Category:SANFL players
376:We currently have the
343:Promoting this project
316:The Falcons (AFL team)
285:The Falcons (AFL team)
3262:comment was added by
2861:More needs to be done
2792:North Carolina Tigers
2703:North Carolina Tigers
765:Port Adelaide Magpies
630:Category:WAFL players
407:Template:Afl-bio-stub
42:of past discussions.
3114:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
3007:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2833:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2773:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2735:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2647:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2608:The Brain of Morbius
2595:The Brain of Morbius
2526:The Brain of Morbius
2476:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2445:I reckon it's good.
2322:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2298:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2245:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2113:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2041:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
2016:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
1531:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
1361:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
1339:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
1320:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
1232:(waarom? jus'b'coz!)
543:Category:AFL players
536:Category:AFL players
405:I've made one here:
87:We should note that
3049:Adelaide University
2662:I have created the
1700:to be listed under
1215:Tom Jones (athlete)
759:Club annual reports
314:I agree with Ambi,
2677:2004-05 NBA season
2602:I take that back.
2408:Infobox_afl_player
649:Added Broadcasters
579:- other AFL medals
3275:
3115:
3074:has set up a new
3008:
2887:
2873:comment added by
2834:
2787:Melbourne Victory
2783:Melbourne Victory
2774:
2764:Melbourne Victory
2736:
2701:Hello. Recently,
2697:Amateur AFL teams
2648:
2477:
2323:
2299:
2246:
2114:
2042:
2017:
1902:LaMarcus Aldridge
1532:
1362:
1340:
1321:
1233:
566:- other AFL teams
137:Football Victoria
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3296:
3257:
3234:
3229:
3224:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3113:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3057:Have your say!!!
3006:
2959:
2956:
2953:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2886:
2867:
2832:
2817:Have your say!!!
2772:
2750:Have your say!!!
2734:
2719:Have your say!!!
2646:
2577:
2572:
2567:
2548:for an example.
2507:
2502:
2497:
2490:Aaron Sandilands
2475:
2456:
2453:
2450:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2412:
2406:
2383:
2378:
2373:
2356:
2351:
2346:
2321:
2297:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2244:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2178:
2175:
2172:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2112:
2066:
2061:
2056:
2040:
2015:
1990:
1985:
1980:
1935:
1930:
1925:
1876:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1530:
1481:
1476:
1471:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1417:
1414:
1411:
1384:
1379:
1374:
1360:
1338:
1319:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1280:Chris L. Johnson
1231:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1025:
1020:
1015:
983:
978:
973:
921:
916:
911:
906:
746:Rover (football)
663:Infobox template
385:
379:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3304:
3303:
3299:
3298:
3297:
3295:
3294:
3293:
3258:—The preceding
3250:
3232:
3227:
3222:
3195:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3091:
3086:
3081:
3068:
3029:
2957:
2954:
2951:
2916:
2911:
2906:
2868:
2863:
2699:
2673:2006 NFL season
2660:
2623:
2604:Justin Longmuir
2575:
2570:
2565:
2505:
2500:
2495:
2454:
2451:
2448:
2430:
2425:
2420:
2415:Justin Longmuir
2410:
2404:
2401:
2381:
2376:
2371:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2312:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2176:
2173:
2170:
2148:
2143:
2138:
2100:
2064:
2059:
2054:
1988:
1983:
1978:
1933:
1928:
1923:
1874:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1791:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1747:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1712:in the vein of
1674:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1503:AFL Season 2006
1499:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1404:
1382:
1377:
1372:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1195:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1043:
1023:
1018:
1013:
981:
976:
971:
953:
919:
914:
909:
904:
788:
761:
703:
693:Blackmissionary
665:
651:
529:
493:
422:
383:
377:
374:
345:
320:Geelong Falcons
277:
262:
235:
217:
212:
197:
175:
133:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3302:
3300:
3292:
3291:
3249:
3248:Kangaroos page
3246:
3245:
3244:
3194:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3067:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3028:
3025:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3015:
3014:
3013:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2862:
2859:
2858:
2857:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2698:
2695:
2659:
2654:
2638:
2637:
2622:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2560:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2403:Check out the
2400:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2236:Frank Aked Snr
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2099:
2096:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2026:Bernie Quinlan
2022:
2001:
2000:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1891:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1790:
1787:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1673:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1612:Adelaide Crows
1592:Brisbane Lions
1566:
1565:
1564:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1464:Portal:Cricket
1403:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1326:
1262:. But if it's
1252:John Beveridge
1211:
1210:
1207:
1194:
1193:Disambiguities
1191:
1190:
1189:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1115:
1114:
1085:
1084:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
994:
993:
952:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
796:these criteria
787:
784:
760:
757:
756:
755:
740:
739:
702:
699:
689:
687:
686:
664:
661:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
615:
614:
583:
582:
581:
580:
574:
569:
568:
567:
561:
551:
528:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
492:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
421:
418:
417:
416:
373:
370:
369:
368:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
276:
273:
261:
258:
234:
231:
216:
213:
204:
196:
193:
174:
171:
169:
132:
129:
127:
125:
124:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3301:
3290:
3286:
3282:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3273:
3269:
3265:
3261:
3255:
3247:
3243:
3240:
3239:
3236:
3235:
3230:
3225:
3218:
3217:AFL FootyTips
3214:
3213:
3212:
3211:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3192:
3186:
3183:
3178:
3172:
3169:
3168:
3165:
3164:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3154:
3153:
3150:
3149:
3144:
3139:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3126:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3116:
3110:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3099:
3098:
3095:
3094:
3089:
3084:
3077:
3073:
3065:
3061:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3040:
3035:
3024:
3012:
3009:
3003:
2998:
2994:
2991:becoming the
2990:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2968:
2965:
2964:
2961:
2960:
2947:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2938:
2934:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2919:
2914:
2909:
2902:
2901:Greg Williams
2898:
2894:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2872:
2860:
2852:
2849:
2844:
2838:
2835:
2829:
2824:
2823:
2821:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2809:Susie O'Neill
2806:
2802:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2775:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2751:
2747:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2737:
2731:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2720:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2696:
2694:
2693:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2669:
2665:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2652:
2649:
2643:
2636:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2628:
2621:
2620:Talk:Football
2618:
2612:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2596:
2592:
2586:
2583:
2582:
2579:
2578:
2573:
2568:
2561:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2537:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2527:
2522:
2516:
2513:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2478:
2472:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2462:
2461:
2458:
2457:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2438:
2437:
2434:
2433:
2428:
2423:
2416:
2409:
2398:
2392:
2389:
2388:
2385:
2384:
2379:
2374:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2362:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2340:
2335:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2324:
2318:
2309:
2303:
2300:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2278:
2275:
2274:
2271:
2270:
2265:
2260:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2247:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2228:
2227:
2218:
2215:
2214:
2211:
2210:
2205:
2200:
2193:
2190:Exactly. See
2189:
2188:
2187:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2179:
2166:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2155:
2152:
2151:
2146:
2141:
2134:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2115:
2109:
2105:
2097:
2095:
2094:
2091:
2075:
2072:
2071:
2068:
2067:
2062:
2057:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2043:
2037:
2032:
2027:
2023:
2021:
2018:
2012:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1999:
1996:
1995:
1992:
1991:
1986:
1981:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1944:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1911:
1905:
1903:
1899:
1893:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1842:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1788:
1786:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1778:
1777:
1772:
1767:
1760:
1759:Harry O'Brien
1756:
1752:
1744:
1740:
1737:
1736:
1733:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1671:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1550:
1545:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1527:
1522:
1521:Lonie from 55
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1511:Lonie From 50
1508:
1507:Collingwood's
1504:
1496:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1477:
1472:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1401:
1393:
1390:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1363:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1344:
1341:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1297:
1292:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1088:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1040:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1003:
999:
992:
989:
988:
985:
984:
979:
974:
967:
963:
962:
961:
959:
950:
947:
931:
930:
926:
923:
922:
917:
912:
907:
900:
899:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
868:
864:
860:
859:
858:
855:
850:
849:
848:
845:
841:
840:
839:
836:
832:
828:
827:
826:
823:
819:
815:
811:
810:
809:
808:
805:
801:
800:Good articles
797:
793:
785:
783:
782:
778:
777:
772:
771:
766:
758:
754:
751:
747:
742:
741:
738:
735:
730:
726:
725:
724:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
700:
698:
697:
694:
685:
682:
678:
677:
676:
675:
672:
668:
662:
660:
659:
656:
648:
642:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
596:
595:
594:
591:
587:
578:
575:
573:
570:
565:
562:
560:
557:
556:
555:
552:
549:
546:
545:
544:
541:
540:
539:
537:
533:
526:
520:
517:
513:
512:
511:
508:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
491:Broadcasting?
490:
480:
477:
473:
472:caveat emptor
469:
465:
461:
460:
459:
456:
452:
451:
450:
447:
443:
442:
441:
438:
433:
432:
431:
430:
427:
419:
415:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
397:
393:
389:
382:
371:
367:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
354:
350:
342:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
286:
282:
274:
272:
271:
268:
259:
257:
256:
253:
248:
247:
244:
239:
232:
230:
229:
226:
222:
214:
211:
208:
203:
201:
194:
192:
191:
188:
184:
180:
172:
170:
167:
166:
163:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
130:
128:
123:
120:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
107:
102:
101:
98:
95:
90:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3251:
3237:
3220:
3198:
3196:
3166:
3162:
3151:
3134:
3096:
3079:
3069:
3030:
3021:
2975:
2962:
2950:
2921:
2904:
2869:— Preceding
2864:
2805:Leisel Jones
2801:Libby Lenton
2700:
2664:2006 NAB Cup
2661:
2657:2006 NAB Cup
2639:
2634:
2624:
2580:
2563:
2510:
2493:
2459:
2447:
2435:
2418:
2402:
2386:
2369:
2359:
2342:
2313:
2288:
2272:
2255:
2212:
2195:
2181:
2169:
2153:
2136:
2133:Jack Worrall
2104:George Tribe
2101:
2086:
2069:
2052:
2029:
1993:
1976:
1949:
1938:
1921:
1906:
1894:
1890:
1878:
1843:
1826:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1779:
1762:
1748:
1734:
1717:
1675:
1657:
1640:
1570:2006 NAB Cup
1557:
1540:
1500:
1484:
1467:
1449:
1432:
1420:
1408:
1405:
1387:
1370:
1304:
1287:
1212:
1199:
1196:
1182:
1165:
1153:
1142:
1125:
1120:OK, look at
1089:
1086:
1077:
1060:
1044:
1028:
1011:
995:
986:
969:
954:
924:
902:
852:commitment.
789:
774:
769:
762:
711:Full-forward
704:
688:
669:
666:
652:
586:Snottygobble
584:
576:
563:
530:
494:
423:
394:
375:
372:afl-bio-stub
346:
278:
263:
249:
236:
225:pfctdayelise
218:
198:
176:
168:
159:
153:pfctdayelise
134:
126:
103:
86:
60:
43:
37:
2846:article. --
2705:was put on
2399:Afl infobox
2339:Adam Butler
2334:User:*Paul*
2028:recently:
2009:skill set.
1957:Shane Warne
1953:Steve Waugh
1863:Tom Hawkins
1616:Collingwood
1587:AFL seasons
1497:2006 Season
719:Jessesaurus
238:User:Biatch
207:Scott Davis
183:Cyberjunkie
36:This is an
3264:Sliat 1981
3109:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
3002:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2897:Gary Ayres
2828:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2768:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2730:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2642:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2471:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2317:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2293:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2289:testa dura
2240:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2232:Frank Aked
2108:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2036:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
2011:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
1896:guys like
1867:Jim Stynes
1859:WP:COPYVIO
1819:Chris Judd
1807:Rant over.
1755:James Hird
1751:Chris Judd
1526:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
1402:Portal:AFL
1356:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
1334:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
1315:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
1272:Ron Howard
1264:Ron Howard
1227:ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑
750:Ibroadbent
474:applies --
260:Great work
200:John Manos
195:John Manos
3254:Kangaroos
3072:Brisvegas
3039:Roisterer
2893:Tom Hafey
2875:Sliat1981
1620:Fremantle
1600:Kangaroos
1596:Melbourne
1243:SethCohen
1219:athletics
701:Positions
681:Rogerthat
638:Rogerthat
507:Rogerthat
455:Rogerthat
437:Rogerthat
411:Rogerthat
353:Rogerthat
332:Rogerthat
162:Rogerthat
106:Rogerthat
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
3272:contribs
3260:unsigned
3182:Rulesfan
3053:Blnguyen
2997:Football
2883:contribs
2871:unsigned
2848:Rulesfan
2813:Blnguyen
2746:Blnguyen
2715:Blnguyen
2627:Football
1910:Boomtish
1898:Rudy Gay
1809:Boomtish
1691:The-Pope
1604:Hawthorn
1156:Boomtish
1093:Boomtish
1047:Boomtish
1002:Normy132
958:Normy132
867:Jasrocks
844:Jasrocks
822:Jasrocks
734:Normy132
464:my lists
381:afl-stub
363:Diverman
349:BigFooty
3233:gerthat
3147:gerthat
3092:gerthat
2917:gerthat
2576:gerthat
2506:gerthat
2431:gerthat
2382:gerthat
2355:gerthat
2268:gerthat
2208:gerthat
2165:WP:CRIC
2149:gerthat
2065:gerthat
1989:gerthat
1934:gerthat
1855:WP:NPOV
1839:gerthat
1775:gerthat
1730:gerthat
1653:gerthat
1608:Geelong
1553:gerthat
1480:gerthat
1445:gerthat
1383:gerthat
1300:gerthat
1178:gerthat
1138:gerthat
1073:gerthat
1024:gerthat
982:gerthat
804:Gflores
691:noted.
330:it is.
324:TAC Cup
322:in the
141:Auskick
39:archive
3125:Remy B
3066:Portal
2937:Remy B
2689:Remy B
2536:Remy B
2124:Remy B
2090:Remy B
1823:WP:AFL
1745:Photos
1578:Remy B
854:Remy B
835:Remy B
632:under
252:Biatch
119:(talk)
97:(talk)
3163:Gizza
2760:Trugo
2486:Libba
2310:Stats
2177:Gizza
1624:Normy
1416:Gizza
920:rocks
671:Jabso
420:Stats
392:Harro
243:Agnte
16:<
3285:talk
3268:talk
3215:The
3207:talk
3199:free
2879:talk
2807:and
2554:talk
2234:and
2131:See
1965:talk
1955:and
1871:Harr
1857:and
1637:this
1635:and
1618:and
1572:and
1501:The
1258:and
1108:talk
898:use
892:talk
816:and
655:Mike
628:and
608:talk
590:Talk
516:Mike
497:Mike
476:Paul
468:here
446:Ambi
426:Ambi
307:Ambi
267:Ambi
187:Talk
3281:JPD
3274:) .
3203:Ian
2958:zza
2668:POV
2550:JPD
2488:or
2455:zza
2291:.
1961:JPD
1104:JPD
1091:No?
888:JPD
604:JPD
577:etc
564:etc
305:).
289:Adz
116:JPD
94:JPD
3287:)
3270:•
3205:≡
3111:-
3055:|
3004:-
2948:.
2899:,
2895:,
2885:)
2881:•
2830:-
2822:.
2815:|
2803:,
2770:-
2748:|
2732:-
2717:|
2683:,
2679:,
2675:,
2644:-
2556:)
2524:--
2473:-
2411:}}
2405:{{
2319:-
2295:-
2242:-
2238:--
2194:.
2110:-
2038:-
2013:-
1967:)
1900:,
1869:?
1716:.
1614:,
1610:,
1606:,
1602:,
1598:,
1594:,
1528:-
1358:-
1336:-
1317:-
1229:-
1206:or
1110:)
1000:.
951:??
927:}
894:)
779:.
713:,
636:.
624:,
610:)
588:|
384:}}
378:{{
326:.
185:|
151:.
143:,
139:,
76:→
3283:(
3266:(
3228:o
3223:R
3142:o
3137:R
3087:o
3082:R
2955:i
2952:G
2912:o
2907:R
2877:(
2571:o
2566:R
2552:(
2501:o
2496:R
2452:i
2449:G
2426:o
2421:R
2377:o
2372:R
2350:o
2345:R
2332:(
2263:o
2258:R
2203:o
2198:R
2174:a
2171:D
2144:o
2139:R
2060:o
2055:R
1984:o
1979:R
1963:(
1929:o
1924:R
1880:5
1875:o
1834:o
1829:R
1770:o
1765:R
1725:o
1720:R
1648:o
1643:R
1590:"
1548:o
1543:R
1475:o
1470:R
1440:o
1435:R
1413:a
1410:D
1378:o
1373:R
1295:o
1290:R
1173:o
1168:R
1133:o
1128:R
1106:(
1068:o
1063:R
1019:o
1014:R
977:o
972:R
915:s
910:a
905:J
890:(
776:K
773:.
770:J
606:(
396:5
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.