372:(after at least two failed amendments to ban the screenshots from lists). The message here is that episode lists should be nothing more than navigational aids, and that we should have the screenshots in individual episode articles - on the pluss side for those guys who want to hide spoilers, the screenshots have now been censored from episode lists. But you now have to wade through hundreds of articles to find that episode where the South Park characters were rendered in 3D. Or ask at the reference desk, or something. Finding an episode is a sufficient purpose when it's part of a critical commentary work like Knowledge. --
213:. As for the genres, they probably would be: anime, manga, school romance, sport (track), and some could argue harem. As for the template, when Leefan first started at wiki, (s)he was started to create blank or stub articles for almost every character until other editors told Leefan to stop and work on one article at a time. Probably, Leefan created the template with the intention of having those articles to link to later. However, I doubt that these characters that are now linked to the Suzuka character article in the template will ever have enough information to warrant separate articles. (
1436:
falls under both groups, and we can use one banner or the other, instead of two banners (cats and ratings would apply to both projects, though). It's simply a better way to interconnect each other and cross-collaborate. From an organizational standpoint, it makes sense to list guidelines and instructions for our new bio tasks on it's own page or section. It would still be us doing it, but just makes things easier. Over-all, I like the idea, but I'd like to see us include
31:
529:. Fair use is a license available only in the US, and people often think of it as a license under which everything can be published; that's a misunderstanding. A screenshot of a character should be used as fair use *only* on that character's article, and there being two it's already pushing the fair use. So I agree with TheFarix that eventually en.wiki will adopt a stricter policy and we won't see so many fair use images anymore. --
1117:. The "Fandom" part is relatively weak, but I don't have much in the way of experience there. Also, on the assumption that anything notable in one language is notable in another, I've expanded the draft scope to include non-English distributors and voice actors. This might result in a few additional lists, but it seems the right thing to do in terms of principle. I'll defer on it, however. Thoughts welcome.--
765:
1550:: "Since biographies are potentially under the purview of almost all WikiProjects, it is important that we work in tandem with these projects. Also, when seeking collaboration on articles, don't neglect to approach WikiProjects that are part of the geographical region your subject is/was in." Setting all that aside, Ned, I'd really like to know if you have any specific suggestions for my draft.--
1098:
the sense that they see
Japanese animation as pure, and make a heavy criticism of western animation and Western animation infleunced by anime), and contain material far too thick for unacquainted laymen to get around. Also, the project makes too much of a distinction between anime and other cartooning (for example,never using the words comic or show). Beyond that, the project is generally fine. (
976:? It seems like this project's doing a good job of providing centralized support material (e.g., the Magazine Archive and Reference Library) and assessment. What can the child projects do in these regards that wouldn't be duplicative? I see that Farix proposed something similar before, but that nothing came of it. Is this because it wouldn't be worth the effort?--
1257:. It started out as a video game series, only adapted to anime later. But the game plays somewhat like an interactive anime (think Disgaea, with dating sim type gameplay between battles), but more importantly, the only English releases have been on the anime. (At the moment, it's currently tagged under both projects)
1364:. Our main project goals have always been focused on the shows and manga's themselves, and this would be a new area for us to actually comment on. As for the rest of the new scope, it just lacks any real description of what's going on. I found the old scope description to be much more informative and clear. --
1546:. I'll also reiterate that the inclusion of mangaka and predates my draft, so "new" is not appropriate. "Undiscussed" or "undocumented" perhaps is more accurate. In any case, the proper path to development for these types of articles lies through both projects: they provide the form, we the content. From the
1920:
I wouldn't normally worry about it, but rebuilding a guideline after it's rejected could take anywhere from a week to a year. There are also some unique concerns regarding spoilers in anime and manga, since they are released in different formats at different times. Something scanlation readers knew 5
1300:
Sorry I'm a bit late to respond, but the old scope description was much better. Also, so far we've been mostly about the anime and manga themselves, and not so much about working on bio articles for directors, voice actors, etc. Our structure guidelines, main focus, etc really isn't for bio articles.
1097:
Just my two cents on the project. When I say the project in this writing, it refers to all articles of an anime related spectrum. The whole seems to be going over well, with a high article quality on average. However, most anime and manga articles are written from the point of hardcore anime fans (in
383:
IMO it's the rare episode of a rare series that is notable enough to warrant an article (let alone the issue of availability of worthy sources). Switching en masse to episode articles, especially if they were to mostly consist of information now contained in the lists, might simply shift the field of
2292:
I think you have misunderstood my suggestion, so I'll elaborate. To your first point, shonen isn't a genre, but shonen, shojo, etc. are commonly used in genre tags as part of the description of manga/anime. My suggestion is to use them as a prefix to the primary genre of the anime rather then take
2149:
It's good to have it in the style guide so that we have somewhere to point people who get annoyed that they can't fill pages with genrecruft, but I think we were already doing that less officially. (At least I was.) But it doesn't change that we still have double the number of genre categories as we
2056:
I think pretty much everyone agrees- I don't remember anyone objecting past the point of "not all manga have a corresponding anime and vice versa". All that is needed is someone with the bot-power to effect all of the changes required. I think consistency is a good thing and have been frustrated for
1324:
That's exactly what I like about the new scope. These pages aren't going to be covered by the
Biography project; they're less likely to know anything or care. If we don't have structure guidelines for people articles, we should develop them rather than go back to the old scope. The new one is a much
1039:
Hmm. Okay, so I guess the thing to do is run it by the individual projects in question and ask if they want to do that, letting people trickle toward it at their own pace. I'm guessing WP:SM won't want to right now, but that doesn't mean we won't drift eventually or that none of the other descendent
367:
They're not enforcing the rules, because the rules on non-free content used under fair use haven't been changed. Somebody pretended that lists with significant textual content were "galleries" and started removing and blocking, pretending that it was a copyright issue, when it really was an issue of
2393:
Ah, understood. Really, there are very few manga pages on
Knowledge that don't meet notability, since in order for a series to earn a translation (or even a scanlation) it will most likely be a series which is either (1) adapted into English and/or an anime and hence notable (2) multiple volumes in
2314:
No, I understood the point. I just think we should create a new line in the infobox for target audience instead of pretending shonen etc are genre. That's another thread, though. As far as your main point; minor elements in the show can be discussed in a style section, and there's no reason why the
1161:
Though I don't see how light novels and visual novels are related to each other to begin with, the sentence appears to state that a visual novel must have an anime or manga adaptation to it before it is considered within the project's scope. So I assume that is any visual novel that has an anime or
574:
That only invites cruft as some editors will now go and create individual character and episode articles just so they can maintain the screenshot. Not every character is notable and it is a rare episode that is notable as well. But it's much easier to demonstrate notability as a group. Thats one of
2072:
Another way to deal with the problem of overcategorization is to reduce the number of genres listed for each property. Currently, people seem to list every genre possible, even if these are redundant. We should encourage people to choose the most appropriate two choices - only a few shows deserve
1641:
Because someone wrongly added them. Most english-speaking voice actors are not notable with a handful being notable. Seiyu are only notable because of the celebrity status of the industry in Japan. Without independent confirmation of notability, non-original voice actors should likely be removed
823:
I'm part of project paranormal, and I'd like us to have a special wikipe-tan all of our own with an MID Theme - A Wikipe-tan in a black sailor fuku with Will smith shades and some tude - of course, I'd like it on my user space too, which I'm lead to believe might require extra permisison from the
348:
I'm not an admin and I support the removal of the screen shots 100%. For a long time I argued in favor of screen shots in LOEs, but I finally came to the conclusion that identifying an episode in a list, while great and all, isn't vital enough to use non-free content. The lists are not as useful,
2170:
I think in general, it's good to follow the guideline that if one category is a child category of another, only the child catagory should be added. Any parents should be removed. This is already a guideline for all of
Knowledge, so it applies here, too. Perhaps put something in suggesting people
1435:
Except it's not something we've done before, and it just adds one more banner to those people's talk page. I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, I'm just pointing out it's somewhat of a new focus for us as a group. The benefit of a task force is that it helps participants to recognize that the work
575:
the reasons why I prefer lists of characters and episodes over individual articles. As for critical commentary of the fair-use image must be present before the fair-use image can be included (which seems to be the route that this small group of editors is taking
Knowledge), that will only invite
314:
I thought
Knowledge was supposed to andvance free content culture by showing how we can make a quality encyclopedia, but it seems that the agenda now is to show disfavour to the "content industries" by somehow making an encyclopedia that says "hey, guys, this is pretty good, but it still sucks a
2235:
My reasoning two-fold. First, many anime arguably fall into several genres, and setting a guideline that limits the description may invite debate over which genre gets listed. Second, I think for many people the use of genres as tags is a useful reference shortcut in an anime/manga listing.
2182:
The problem with that rule as related to this case is that not all of a genre will necessarily fit into another genre even if most of them do, so we can't exactly subcategorize one genre under another. So which genres are the most predominant really has to come down to editorial judgment.
986:
Seems reasonable to me, especially since in most of those cases they are effectively taskforces, just at a different pagename due to the taskforce idea not being popular yet when they were created. (Visual novels is more iffy though, since they're about equally under our scope,
520:
It won't ever happen that free images completely replace fair use images, that's true; but fair use images don't necessarily have to be there. Take ja.wiki: have you ever seen a screenshot of a manga, anime or videogame in one of their articles? Compare the images/text ratio in
1381:
It's totally standard for a project scope to include people closely related to their subjects. (I see no advantage to a task force here either, since the people likely to find information about a given mangaka will be the same ones as edit the articles on the creator's
1338:
Ned, obviously I disagree with you that the old scope was better, though I'd be keen to hear what specifically you don't like about the new one. Setting that aside, even the old scope claims mangaka, so it's no real stretch to explicitly add directors. And we refer to
337:
would accomodate fair use to the same extent that
Knowledge in theory does, and if out-of-process actions become the norm there too. I was here to build a 💕, not some in-universe fan site, so I'm not really interested in going over to some wiki devoted to only to
241:(and fatured status) have been called into question. Might need new images or better rationales. These rationales must speak to why the particular image was chosen to identify the episode - a simple copy-and-past rationale that is the same on all images won't do.
2293:
them out, as I think they have value (an english equivilant might be 'kids-comedy' vs. 'college-age-comedy'). To your second point, I'm not necessarily advocating using those tags for SAC. Those are the tags already in place and I was using them as an example.
638:
Well, if we wanted to be more like the
Japanese wikipedia, we could also get rid of quotations and references. Apparently, the JA wikipedia's strict interpretation of the GFDL prohibits this as well. This causes many problems when translating text from JA.
1881:
I think that, as a project, we should defer to whatever is agreed to by the new guideline. The problem with WikiProjects defining their own guidelines on the use of spoiler warnings is that it fosters a senses of "ownership" on articles that are within our
1411:
Exactly. It seems perfectly logical to me to put up or expand a page for the manga artist, author, director or other staff while working on the page for the series itself. I doubt I'm the only one doing that, and it's high time the project scope recognized
505:
Utter nonsense. Claiming that Fair Use will go extinct is to say that either copyright law or our critical reasoning ability will be abolished, since there is no such thing as a free image for an irreplicable event. But if you want to dream that, go ahead.
2086:
is a science fiction comedy, and the other genre are unneccessary. Seinen is not even a genre. It seems like we could codify some simple, easy to follow guidelines for how to decide what genre a show is, and limit the field from ballooning like this.
2114:
I definitely agree we need to cut down on the number of genres on each article, and maybe get some guidelines up for doing so. As it is, genres are basically putting each and every thing that any series could possibly apply to, no matter how minor.
2336:
Could someone add it to our delsort page? I'm not exactly sure how to do this... (And, based on the hubbub about it being placed on hiatus by Seven Seas and spawning some major drama at ANN, I'm pretty sure it meets the notability requirements.)
1611:
On the subject of people within the scope of the project, there's something that bothers me about the voice actors. If the project does not cover "anime voice actors that speak in neither
Japanese nor English" then why do characters pages like
1992:
and inform them that if the fan speculation can not pass both of those policies, then it has no place on
Knowledge. Of course there is still the chance that editors will be angry over it, but there is not much you can do about those types.
1895:
have a WikiProject specific guideline, then it should be the most restricted version of "no spoiler warnings". There is little chance of the Knowledge guideline will be any more restrictive then that with the placement of spoiler warnings.
1651:
For en and ja voice actors, listing them on the pages of the characters they act as is logical because they are the original language and the article's target audience language, whether the individual VAs deserve an article or not.
859:(edit conflict)No, no extra permission would be required. The images are all freely licensed, you can do whatever you want with them. Good luck actually getting him to draw them though, he's pretty request-swamped right now. --
1052:
My take on it is that there's no reason to have a nominally independent wikiproject when it's acting as a taskforce in practice, since it just creates an extra layer of complexity. I invite you to take a look at the
179:
template needs to be changed, I think, so that it only contains one link per article, not per character etc. I'm not 100% sure of the policy on this one though. At the very least the last line of the template should
1700:. Neither of these articles will probably ever get beyond stub length, unless of course someone went and did a blow-by-blow retelling of their entire plots. Should they perhaps be merged with the author's page?
2271:
Secondly, the series is Cyberpunk - which renders Sci-fi and Action redundant. Mystery could be a back up...is there a better term though? Mystery implies detectives to me, while GiTS is more police procedural.
287:
1718:
From what I've seen, one-shot mangas normally don't get their own page since there isn't enough info to bring them past stub length. Pages like these should just be covered on the artist's page. --Malevious
2267:
Two problems right off - shonen isn't a genre, and should never be in the genre field in the first place. If we want to create a new slot for shonen/seinen (GiTS is seinen) that would work, but it isn't a
1585:
Sorry to have given off bad vibes. :) I think I was more puzzled than anything about your concerns about people. My big thing was working together to improve the text of the scope. Better luck next time I
1563:
about adding us to their banner for bio articles, and maybe set up something so both projects will watch the same set of recommended guidelines (two sets of eyes to update, and prevent conflicts, etc). --
2274:
These are guidelines rather than rules, and if a case can be made that an property deserves more than two or three genres, that would be fine. But debate would probably help reduce the amount of clutter.
2356:
If they're running test cases, you'd think people would pick something more borderline to nominate than a series with an anime adaptation. Or was this one just pulled off of recent changes or something?
1071:
to discuss category-wide issues. We have just under 100 articles that fall solidly in our scope, but we didn't feel a separate project was necessary since it's really just 10-15 of us doing the work. --
394:
My complaint is not the removal itself, but the total disregard for established procedures. We didn't know our stuff was going away until it was gone. We didn't get to participate. It's ridiculous. --
1953:, should not be in any articles due to its being original research by some fans, and its lack of attribution. Does that mean, any kind of fan speculations, even universally accepted by fans, should
1157:
Video games were within the scope so long as the game was an adaptation of an anime or manga series, but not the other way around. However the original line about visual novels was far less clear,
1009:
we already refer back here whenever we need advice or for ratings, so it seems like the only change would be that we couldn't call ourselves a WikiProject anymore. Which would be kind of sad. --
299:
Looks to me like the admins are waging war on TV related articles. First individual episode pages now episode screenshots. In a month there won't be any TV related articles left... --Malevious
1850:
1703:
I would normally have conducted this discussion on the relevant talk pages, but none of them are particularly active and there may be cases beyond just those 3 articles that need discussed. --
244:
Additionally, after several failed amendments to ban screenshots from episode lists, images on other Featured Lists are now being removed by some administators. See the administrator board at
358:
And believe me, I didn't come to this conclusion lightly. I've spent hours upon hours finding good screen shots, and even longer making arguments to be able to use screen shots, in LOEs. --
1276:
1559:
I'm sensing some bad vibes, plus it might be easier to just work from improving the new draft rather than a full revert, so whatever. If anyone hasn't already, I'll leave a note with
1325:
cleaner read, and a good redefinition. (I'd been adding the banner on talk pages for mangaka and light novel writers for a while, without even realizing that there was any question.)
730:
1547:
1768:
No. Things are notable when they have multiple non-trivial independent references or have won a major award. International translation itself gives no indication of notability. --
349:
they don't look as good, and it sucks, but that's just the way it is. We all just got a little to comfortable with having things slide, but now people are enforcing the rules. --
733:
as well, listing anime-related books which could be used as references for articles. Please go add any books you have (or add your name next to those already listed). Thanks! ···
333:
It seems that this random selection of admins wants to have individual episode articles rather than lists, so I guess that's what we need to go for now. Either that or seeing if
183:
The category description should be changed to reflect the fact that it's a category to collect Suzuka-related articles, not Suzuka-related files, and the template can be removed.
94:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
788:. Be aware, however, that he'll probably be more inclined to aid you if your suggestion aids Knowledge articles or projects, rather than being just for your personal usage. --
2038:
1178:
Regarding visual novels, if the VN in question has neither an anime, nor a manga, nor a light novel adaptation, then it falls out of the scope of WP:Anime. A good example is
1800:
to a more appropriate tag. Most of these images contain no source information at all, or fair use rationale. We've let it slide for a long time, and unfortunately there are
543:
The obvious solution is to write better text which makes proper use of the images. If this were done properly, the anti-Fair Use brigades wouldn't have a leg to stand on. --
274:
The admins are not informing anybody before making wide-scale deletions, and are not following any kind of documented procedure at all. It's anarchy and it is ridiculous. --
1828:
This looks like it's going to be fun. Majority of all anime images I've seen lack fair-use rational, so we've got a lot of work to do after these are done. --Malevious
2315:
title can't appear on a list of ____ anime and manga. But they shouldn't be in the info box, and the idea is intended to reduce the number of categories as well...
726:
2030:
Nothing came of the discussion then, but I have finally gotten around to making a CFD nomination for the proposed merge. I have already listed the discussion on
2015:
Some of you may remember a discussion (now archived) in which I proposed that, since the genres used to classify anime and manga are identical, we should merge
1685:
What is the policy regarding one-shot manga and very short series by notable authors? One-shots by non-notable authors I assume could just go up for deletion.
487:
I hope they will; fair use is forbidden in most of the other wikipedias, and it's like an "exclusive" of en.wiki. That's just unfair :-) P.S. Because of the
1984:
Tag is as needing a reference. If no suitable references are provided within a couple of weeks, then delete it. If someone complains, then point them to
47:
17:
1127:
Sorry I didn't see this earlier. I would like to comment that video games and visual novels are outside of this project's scope, as they are covered by
2394:
length and hence notable (3) by a notable author and hence notable. Anything else we simply don't have the info in English to write an article on. --
1159:"Light novels, but not Visual novels lacking anime or manga adaptations. For the relevant project on visual novels, see WikiProject Visual novels."
2206:
1863:
Considering the guideline is currently rejected pending a new revision, it may be in our interests to establish a project style on the matter. ---
1061:
916:
663:
1734:
Once the one shots are brought into a collection, like Ohikkoshi, a page might be justified, but uncollected one-shots seem a little excessive.
1543:
910:
I propose a section devoted to the different Manga/Anime trade magazines. Because there are several that I can think of right off the bat.
1815:
1179:
1973:
416:
151:, although I'm not 100% sure which genres it falls in (possibly Romance and School, but probably not Sport although some may disagree).
845:, I don't think anyone else here would be able to help you. And his talk page seems to be used mostly for this kind of requests ^^ --
2083:
2024:
1162:
manga adaptation regardless of which one came first. The new version implies that the anime and manga version must come first. --
111:. I have no idea where to link it to WP's category structure but I bet some of you do. Also maybe it's name could be improved to
2424:, if nothing else, is published by a very notable company, so I do not believe there should be a controversy on that article.--
1835:
1726:
1025:
state of things official. The only real differences would be lowered banner clutter on your talk pages and a few page moves. --
991:, and the actual book project.) The real question is if they're agreeable to it, we can't exactly go annex them or anything. --
675:
315:
little because of that stupid copyright legislation". I think the former strategy is a hell of a lot better than the latter. --
306:
1818:. I've only created a very basic page for now, and would really appreciate any help with improving the instructions page. --
928:
2034:, but either nobody has that page on their watchlist or nobody cares about the merger, so I'm announcing it here directly.
1517:... As a project we haven't really commented on what to do for bio articles, which is what I meant for something "new". --
1787:
841:
Kasuga is uploading every image of Wikipe-tan on Commons, so no, you wouldn't need any extra permission; anyway, ask him
2441:
2416:
2403:
2388:
2366:
2351:
2341:
2319:
2297:
2279:
2256:
2240:
2192:
2177:
2159:
2136:
2123:
2109:
listed as a genre. Just because a show has a few funny scenes or makes some jokes doesn't mean it's a comedy, guys.
2091:
2061:
2050:
2004:
1978:
1930:
1907:
1872:
1857:
1838:
1822:
1772:
1763:
1749:
1738:
1729:
1712:
1670:
1661:
1646:
1634:
1624:
1599:
1590:
1568:
1554:
1521:
1488:
1448:
1416:
1394:
1368:
1351:
1329:
1315:
1305:
1295:
1261:
1232:
1199:
1173:
1152:
1121:
1102:
1080:
1047:
1034:
1016:
1000:
980:
968:
Are there any opinions on converting the Digimon, Dragon Ball, Gundam, Sailor Moon, and Visual Novels projects into
957:
932:
899:
889:
868:
854:
832:
814:
797:
778:
753:
739:
714:
696:
679:
643:
617:
590:
552:
538:
515:
500:
481:
458:
434:
408:
401:
388:
376:
362:
353:
342:
319:
309:
294:
281:
269:
252:
217:
195:
123:
2079:
2057:
a long time with the inconsistency in this WikiProject, probably its only problem (since the scope is so broad). --
746:
38:
234:
1808:
2020:
2016:
2082:
does not need any of those larger categories once it has mecha. Mecha and Comedy are the only genre needed.
1967:
1801:
1745:
IMO, In the absence of any evidence of notability, one shots are best collected in the mangaka's article. --
116:
1794:
108:
1114:
1469:
It wouldn't be anything new at all. If your concern is only the banner tagging, then somebody go bug the
1099:
2413:
2338:
412:
369:
2027:, as is done already with many of the other anime and manga categories, to prevent overcategorization.
1275:
In response to the queries, how about: "Media belonging to the same franchises as the above, including
419:. Not that I'm happy with this decision, but it looks like this is what is going to end up happening.--
1228:? Are they games "in which anime or manga characters make incidental or out-of-context appearances?"--
1224:
1473:
807:
210:
140:
133:
112:
2097:
I certainly agree with this. The genres on pretty much every article are totally worthless because
2058:
667:
415:
would have to be altered to remove the possibility of adding screenshots to comply with Knowledge's
1832:
1723:
1311:
Hmm, looking more into it, I'm not sure if we've discussed the people part of our scope before. --
1068:
969:
850:
671:
534:
496:
303:
1005:
What difference would it make? (This is an actual question, not a rhetorical one.) I know that at
491:
some wikipedias are censoring the images from commons, so you just don't know how lucky you are --
2253:
2000:
1961:
1903:
1169:
1044:
1013:
924:
896:
886:
829:
775:
710:
586:
526:
477:
398:
278:
265:
1960:
A related question: I wonder how to remove such content on articles without angering editors.--
2433:
2380:
2031:
1696:
despite the piece being all of 65 pages long, and a similar page for his one volume anthology
1191:
1144:
1021:
You already are a taskforce in everything but page title, so basically it would just make the
973:
488:
451:
427:
136:, as most of the articles are articles on characters or other features of the anime and manga.
2399:
2362:
2188:
2155:
2046:
1926:
1868:
1759:
1708:
1657:
1484:
1390:
1284:
1218:
1076:
1030:
996:
953:
864:
842:
811:
793:
750:
692:
548:
511:
2041:, and if you haven't yet, please watchlist our deletion sorting page as well. Thank you. --
660:
Should a catagory of "Otaku Anime" be added for series which are markeeted to anime otaku?
2409:
2371:
Pretty sure it was off recent changes as the nominator is a protoller of recent changes.--
1693:
1613:
1560:
1514:
1441:
1437:
1361:
1340:
1054:
373:
339:
316:
249:
173:
158:
572:
A screenshot of a character should be used as fair use *only* on that character's article
129:
Hmmm ... a few comments (all are my opinion only, but I think they're fairly justified):
1804:
that likely require updating. To assist in this task I've updated the project's banner,
2348:
2316:
2276:
2133:
2088:
1854:
1829:
1819:
1735:
1720:
1689:
1596:
1565:
1518:
1445:
1413:
1365:
1326:
1312:
1302:
846:
530:
492:
359:
350:
300:
148:
144:
1945:
Fan speculations are rampant in anime and manga, and these, according to standards on
2250:
2172:
1995:
1989:
1985:
1950:
1946:
1898:
1790:
is facing a mass image cleanup task, started by the need to update images from using
1631:
1621:
1617:
1587:
1551:
1348:
1344:
1292:
1229:
1164:
1128:
1118:
1067:
myself, which we started recently so that we would have a discussion area other than
1041:
1010:
988:
977:
920:
883:
734:
705:
612:
581:
576:
472:
395:
385:
275:
260:
214:
2426:
2373:
2294:
2237:
2222:
1769:
1746:
1667:
1643:
1258:
1184:
1137:
1132:
1006:
764:
640:
444:
420:
245:
384:
battle and prolong the acrimony rather than settle the issue one way or another.--
2395:
2358:
2184:
2151:
2042:
1922:
1864:
1755:
1704:
1653:
1630:
I also disliked that wording, which is why I changed it in the draft scope. :)--
1480:
1386:
1254:
1072:
1026:
992:
949:
941:
860:
789:
785:
772:
Can I get whoever drew Wikipe-tan to draw me a custom version for my user page?
688:
544:
507:
334:
291:
206:
192:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2116:
120:
1291:)." This is more general and removes concerns about the path of adaptation.--
2218:
2102:
1697:
467:
2203:
japanese-domographic primary-genre, with this, that, and the-other elements
703:
It is also not a genre recognized by most anime reviewers and databases. --
611:
If they do that, we can AfD the article if the character isn't notable. ···
154:
Also, the two templates in the Category need to be removed from it, in the
1513:
I don't see any bio-guidelines on our page except that which is linked to
1385:
Other than that, no opinion on the revised scope one way or the other. --
1280:
1057:
page, which outlines the current effort to reform the Wikiproject system.
522:
1921:
years ago may be the biggest spoiler EVAR for an English dub watcher. --
2226:
1347:). And all of that was there in some form before I took a stab at it.--
1288:
2214:
2211:
1595:
Nah, you had the right idea, I was just.. off in space, I think. --
2201:
For what it's worth, I'd love to see it changed to something like:
1849:
Should we have spoiler warnings in articles or not? Discussion on
1754:
If it's been internationally translated, it's probably notable. --
1040:
projects will want to. If it's just semantics there's no hurry. --
940:
We already cover those, unless something changed recently and the
763:
1222:? Does it fall under the project's scope? How about its copycat,
288:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/List of Family Guy episodes
1479:
guys and ask them to add an anime and manga-related subfield. --
749:
some time ago, but a centralised one is much better obviously.
687:
No, it would be totally subjective in its inclusion criteria.--
25:
1444:) to cut down on banners and to better cross-collaborate. --
1343:
in the "Article Structure" section (check out the demands on
1851:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Spoiler warning
2105:- a rather dark sci-fi series, which, for some reason has
2132:
I added a note to the main page. Comments? Improvements?
1360:
In that case we should just make a joint task force with
2412:
is still there. OEL/Amerimanga is even more tenuous! :P
2171:
categorize according to the 2-3 main themes/genres. ···
466:
Eventually, all fair-use images will go the way of the
440:
258:
And the Wikiwar on fair use images continues *sigh*. --
2073:
more than two genre listings. For example, mecha : -->
1283:, soundtracks, and stage shows and musicals (such as
441:
it already happened to Template:Japanese episode list
186:
I have no idea what to do with the image subcategory.
2249:Nice for prose, problematic for categorization. --
1814:with a notice, and started an instruction page at
143:should be placed in appropriate subcategories of
1113:I've taken the additional liberty of drafting a
209:, who was a new editor. The category should be
2408:I'm still rather shocked that my article for
407:So from what I'm getting, it would seem that
107:I stumbled upon this uncategorised category:
8:
2037:Please feel free to express your opinion at
1692:, who currently has an article for his work
913:1) Newtype 2) Anime Insider 3) Shonen Jump
229:Featured list images being removed by sysops
1182:which currently has no adaptations to it.--
248:for examples and surrounding discussion. --
2011:Since apparently nobody follows WP:MANGA/D
1301:I'll expand on my reasons in a moment. --
1216:On the subject of video games. What about
205:That category and template was created by
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
729:, I thought it would be useful to have a
2207:Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
1279:, visual novels, live action versions,
1093:A Personal View on WikiProject A&M
768:Move along people, nothing to see here
164:case by making it <includeonly: -->
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
1816:Knowledge:WikiProject Digimon/Images
246:WP:AN#Clean up for the featured ones
1666:I clarified my original message. --
1180:Tomoyo After: It's a Wonderful Life
24:
2084:The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya
2025:Category:Anime and manga by genre
1845:Spoiler warnings up for deletion
29:
1783:mass image cleanup for Digimon
409:Template:Japanese episode list
165:rather than <noinclude: -->
1:
1688:Specifically I'm thinking of
895:Wikitan in black - AWESOME -
1941:Dealing with Fan speculation
2466:
2080:Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann
286:People should weigh in at
2032:our deletion sorting page
489:Exemption Doctrine Policy
417:Non-free content criteria
2442:07:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2417:07:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2404:07:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2389:07:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2367:06:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2352:06:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2342:06:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2320:18:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2298:12:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2280:02:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2257:01:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2241:01:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2193:23:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2178:23:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2160:00:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2137:23:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2124:19:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2092:18:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2062:14:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2051:07:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2005:12:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1979:12:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1931:08:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1908:00:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1873:10:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1858:04:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
1839:02:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
1823:06:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
1773:04:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
1764:09:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1750:20:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
1739:22:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
1730:22:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
1713:18:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
1671:04:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
1662:05:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1647:04:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1635:03:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1625:22:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1600:06:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
1591:07:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1569:04:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1555:03:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1522:21:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1489:20:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1449:07:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1417:04:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1395:23:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1369:23:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1352:13:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1330:09:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1316:03:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1306:03:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1296:20:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1262:11:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1233:04:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1200:04:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1174:01:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1153:23:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
948:in our scope anymore. --
900:06:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
890:18:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
644:01:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
218:03:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2332:Nymphet up for deletion
2021:Category:Manga by genre
2017:Category:Anime by genre
1642:from those articles. --
1122:19:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1103:16:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1081:06:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1048:06:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1035:05:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1017:05:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1001:05:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
981:05:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
964:Task forces/work groups
958:07:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
933:06:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
869:07:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
855:07:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
833:07:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
815:01:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
806:Well, there is already
798:23:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
779:20:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
754:01:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
740:19:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
715:11:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
697:05:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
680:05:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
618:16:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
591:11:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
553:09:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
539:09:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
516:09:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
501:23:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
482:22:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
459:22:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
435:21:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
402:21:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
389:19:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
377:19:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
363:19:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
354:19:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
343:18:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
320:18:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
310:00:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
295:22:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
282:21:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
270:20:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
253:18:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
196:23:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
193:Confusing Manifestation
124:12:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
117:Category:Suzuka (manga)
2150:have actual genres. --
784:Not our decision, ask
769:
760:Wikipe-tan sailor fuku
2099:all of them are there
2077:science fiction : -->
2076:drama and mecha : -->
1544:slight bio-guidelines
919:comment was added by
808:Image:Wikitanface.png
767:
666:comment was added by
656:Anime otaku as genre?
413:Template:Episode list
109:Category:Suzuka Files
103:Category:Suzuka Files
42:of past discussions.
2023:trees into a common
1259:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫
2068:Streamlining genres
1788:WikiProject Digimon
1548:relevant work-group
1069:Talk:Bleach (manga)
132:Yes this should be
2101:. Take a look at
1620:list the credit?--
770:
139:Having done that,
2402:
2365:
2191:
2158:
2049:
1929:
1871:
1762:
1711:
1660:
1487:
1393:
1079:
1033:
999:
956:
944:article suddenly
936:
878:...Okay, that is
867:
796:
731:Reference Library
721:Reference Library
695:
683:
577:original research
551:
514:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2457:
2440:
2437:
2430:
2414:Kyaa the Catlord
2398:
2387:
2384:
2377:
2361:
2339:Kyaa the Catlord
2205:. For example,
2187:
2175:
2154:
2121:
2045:
1976:
1970:
1964:
1925:
1867:
1813:
1809:WikiProject DIGI
1807:
1799:
1793:
1758:
1707:
1681:One-shots policy
1656:
1483:
1478:
1472:
1389:
1285:Bleach (musical)
1225:Battle Moon Wars
1219:Super Robot Wars
1198:
1195:
1188:
1151:
1148:
1141:
1075:
1029:
995:
952:
914:
906:Widen the Scope?
863:
792:
737:
727:Magazine Archive
725:Since we have a
691:
661:
615:
547:
510:
455:
448:
431:
424:
178:
172:
163:
157:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2465:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2435:
2428:
2425:
2410:12 Days (manga)
2382:
2375:
2372:
2334:
2173:
2117:
2074:adventure : -->
2070:
2013:
1974:
1968:
1962:
1943:
1847:
1811:
1805:
1797:
1791:
1785:
1694:Emerald (manga)
1683:
1614:Haruhi Suzumiya
1476:
1470:
1253:And what about
1193:
1186:
1183:
1146:
1139:
1136:
1135:respectively.--
1111:
1095:
966:
915:—The preceding
908:
762:
735:
723:
662:—The preceding
658:
613:
453:
446:
429:
422:
231:
211:Category:Suzuka
176:
170:
161:
155:
141:Category:Suzuka
134:Category:Suzuka
113:Category:Suzuka
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2463:
2461:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2369:
2333:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2272:
2269:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2244:
2243:
2232:
2231:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2127:
2126:
2111:
2110:
2069:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2039:the discussion
2012:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1942:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1876:
1875:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1690:Hiroaki Samura
1682:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1638:
1637:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1383:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1355:
1354:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1319:
1318:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1110:
1107:
1100:80.247.146.169
1094:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1058:
1003:
965:
962:
961:
960:
907:
904:
903:
902:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
836:
835:
826:
825:
820:
819:
818:
817:
801:
800:
761:
758:
757:
756:
722:
719:
718:
717:
700:
699:
657:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
464:
463:
462:
461:
392:
391:
381:
380:
379:
370:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
365:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
181:
167:
152:
149:Category:Manga
145:Category:Anime
137:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2462:
2443:
2439:
2438:
2432:
2431:
2423:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2386:
2385:
2379:
2378:
2370:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2350:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2340:
2331:
2321:
2318:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2299:
2296:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2281:
2278:
2273:
2270:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2258:
2255:
2252:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2242:
2239:
2234:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2213:
2209:might become
2208:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2176:
2169:
2168:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2138:
2135:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2122:
2120:
2113:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2090:
2085:
2081:
2067:
2063:
2060:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2033:
2028:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1997:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1977:
1971:
1965:
1958:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1940:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1894:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1856:
1852:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1836:Contributions
1834:
1831:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1821:
1817:
1810:
1803:
1796:
1789:
1782:
1774:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1727:Contributions
1725:
1722:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1686:
1680:
1672:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1640:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1619:
1618:Tenchi Masaki
1615:
1601:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1570:
1567:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1542:We have some
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1523:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1475:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1418:
1415:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1350:
1346:
1345:Matt Groening
1342:
1337:
1336:
1331:
1328:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1220:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1201:
1197:
1196:
1190:
1189:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1143:
1142:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1115:revised scope
1108:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1092:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1064:
1059:
1056:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
985:
984:
983:
982:
979:
975:
971:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
938:
937:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
911:
905:
901:
898:
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
885:
881:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
839:
838:
837:
834:
831:
828:
827:
822:
821:
816:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
802:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
782:
781:
780:
777:
773:
766:
759:
755:
752:
748:
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
732:
728:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
702:
701:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
655:
645:
642:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
619:
616:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
592:
588:
584:
583:
578:
573:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
504:
503:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
474:
469:
460:
457:
456:
450:
449:
442:
438:
437:
436:
433:
432:
426:
425:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
397:
390:
387:
382:
378:
375:
371:
366:
364:
361:
357:
356:
355:
352:
347:
346:
345:
344:
341:
336:
321:
318:
313:
312:
311:
308:
307:Contributions
305:
302:
298:
297:
296:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
280:
277:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
242:
240:
238:
228:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
185:
182:
175:
168:
160:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
135:
131:
130:
128:
127:
126:
125:
122:
118:
114:
110:
102:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2434:
2427:
2421:
2381:
2374:
2335:
2210:
2202:
2118:
2106:
2098:
2075:action : -->
2071:
2036:
2029:
2014:
1994:
1959:
1954:
1944:
1897:
1892:
1848:
1802:1,160 images
1795:Digimonimage
1786:
1702:
1687:
1684:
1610:
1299:
1281:audio dramas
1274:
1223:
1217:
1192:
1185:
1163:
1158:
1145:
1138:
1112:
1096:
1062:
1022:
967:
945:
912:
909:
879:
877:
774:
771:
745:I did start
724:
704:
659:
580:
571:
471:
465:
452:
445:
428:
421:
393:
332:
259:
243:
236:
232:
191:
106:
78:
43:
37:
1833:•Talk Page•
1724:•Talk Page•
1474:WPBiography
1440:(and maybe
1277:video games
1255:Sakura Wars
1109:Scope draft
1060:I'm on the
970:task forces
942:Shonen Jump
897:perfectblue
830:perfectblue
812:Shiroi Hane
786:User:Kasuga
776:perfectblue
751:Shiroi Hane
747:my own list
335:Citizendium
304:•Talk Page•
119:? Enjoy! -
36:This is an
2078:drama, so
1957:be in WP?
1891:But if we
974:WP:MILHIST
439:Too late;
374:GunnarRene
340:GunnarRene
317:GunnarRene
250:GunnarRene
233:Images on
95:Archive 20
90:Archive 19
85:Archive 18
79:Archive 17
73:Archive 16
68:Archive 15
60:Archive 10
2349:Ned Scott
2347:Done. --
2317:Doceirias
2277:Doceirias
2229:elements.
2219:Cyberpunk
2134:Doceirias
2103:Betterman
2089:Doceirias
2059:Squilibob
1975:Salvadori
1855:Ned Scott
1820:Ned Scott
1736:Doceirias
1698:Ohikkoshi
1597:Ned Scott
1566:Ned Scott
1519:Ned Scott
1446:Ned Scott
1414:Doceirias
1366:Ned Scott
1327:Doceirias
1313:Ned Scott
1303:Ned Scott
1065:taskforce
847:Εξαίρετος
668:Anymouse1
531:Εξαίρετος
493:Εξαίρετος
468:dodo bird
360:Ned Scott
351:Ned Scott
2251:Masamage
1830:Userpage
1721:Userpage
1632:Monocrat
1622:Nohansen
1588:Monocrat
1586:guess.--
1561:WP:WPBIO
1552:Monocrat
1515:WP:WPBIO
1442:WP:JAPAN
1438:WP:WPBIO
1362:WP:WPBIO
1349:Monocrat
1341:WP:WPBIO
1293:Monocrat
1230:Nohansen
1119:Monocrat
1055:WP:WPREF
1042:Masamage
1023:de facto
1011:Masamage
978:Monocrat
929:contribs
921:Amaraiel
917:unsigned
884:Masamage
676:contribs
664:unsigned
523:Mahoraba
396:Masamage
386:Monocrat
338:anime.--
301:Userpage
276:Masamage
239:episodes
237:Planetes
235:List of
215:Duane543
2422:12 Days
2295:MkDoyle
2238:MkDoyle
2227:Mystery
2217:, with
1969:Curtisi
1770:Kunzite
1747:Kunzite
1668:Kunzite
1644:Kunzite
1382:manga.)
1289:Tenimyu
880:awesome
843:in talk
824:author.
641:Kunzite
527:ja:まほらば
39:archive
2396:tjstrf
2359:tjstrf
2268:genre.
2225:, and
2223:Action
2215:Sci-fi
2212:Shonen
2185:tjstrf
2152:tjstrf
2107:comedy
2043:tjstrf
1990:WP:NOR
1986:WP:ATT
1963:Samuel
1951:WP:NOR
1947:WP:ATT
1923:tjstrf
1882:scope.
1865:tjstrf
1756:tjstrf
1705:tjstrf
1654:tjstrf
1481:tjstrf
1387:tjstrf
1129:WP:CVG
1073:tjstrf
1063:Bleach
1027:tjstrf
993:tjstrf
989:WP:CVG
950:tjstrf
861:tjstrf
790:tjstrf
689:tjstrf
545:tjstrf
508:tjstrf
292:JuJube
207:Leefan
174:Suzuka
159:Suzuka
2119:Moogy
1996:Farix
1955:never
1899:Farix
1853:. --
1412:that.
1165:Farix
1133:WP:VN
1007:WP:SM
972:à la
946:isn't
706:Farix
582:Farix
473:Farix
443:...--
261:Farix
121:Nabla
16:<
2400:talk
2363:talk
2189:talk
2156:talk
2047:talk
2019:and
2001:Talk
1988:and
1949:and
1927:talk
1904:Talk
1893:must
1869:talk
1760:talk
1709:talk
1658:talk
1616:and
1485:talk
1391:talk
1170:Talk
1131:and
1077:talk
1031:talk
997:talk
954:talk
925:talk
882:. --
865:talk
794:talk
711:Talk
693:talk
672:talk
587:Talk
579:. --
549:talk
525:and
512:talk
478:Talk
470:. --
411:and
266:Talk
169:The
147:and
2174:日本穣
1972:di
1966:di
1287:or
851:msg
736:日本穣
614:日本穣
535:msg
497:msg
180:go.
115:or
2357:--
2221:,
2183:--
2003:)
1993:--
1906:)
1896:--
1812:}}
1806:{{
1798:}}
1792:{{
1652:--
1477:}}
1471:{{
1172:)
1105:)
931:)
927:•
853:)
810:.
713:)
678:)
674:•
639:--
589:)
537:)
506:--
499:)
480:)
290:.
268:)
177:}}
171:{{
162:}}
156:{{
64:←
2436:八
2429:十
2383:八
2376:十
2254:♫
1999:(
1902:(
1194:八
1187:十
1168:(
1147:八
1140:十
1045:♫
1014:♫
935:.
923:(
887:♫
849:(
709:(
682:.
670:(
585:(
533:(
495:(
476:(
454:八
447:十
430:八
423:十
399:♫
279:♫
264:(
220:)
166:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.