1606:
but the colon option seems logical as well. And finally, I'm completely smittened with the little music note. Unlike the stars, they usually end up at the end of titles, where they don't look so cluttered, so they really don't hurt the translation in any way by being including (assuming people don't forget to make easier redirects of cource) and they feel that much more official. I assume there are also a few titles that use hearts in the same way, I don't know of an example, but I support them as well.
795:
anything. It's missing the forward back functions of the TV series, however, I need the ISBN, publication, etc functions of the infobox. Again, an agreed upon info box would be nice to have. Particularly for dealing with shinzoubon (the reprinted volumes kodansha and
Shueisha have been doing). I still want to be able to have an image, etc... but the book infobox needs some customization, like Volume number, chapters covered, etc for it to fit well to what a manga infobox needs.
138:(about the Manchurian-Japanese singer), Ikoku no Oka (Foreign Hill about a post WWII internment camp in Siberia), and Southern Cross (B and C class War Crime trials in Indonesia.) I should get around to writing these articles one day--they're hard to source, though. I didn't realize that s/he refered to "Kiki's Delivery Service" as a popular musical. It had three runs, but nothing to write home about. A lot of the musicals of the 90's had cast members from
31:
273:, and I suspect many of the others do too (and in some cases, there's just one article for anime and manga, so they might use a DVD cover or other such image from the anime). It might be worth putting some work in to add the manga cover tag ... only apparently it doesn't exist (The only cover in the category, for the Evangelion manga, apparently uses the comic book cover template and was added to the manga cover category manually).
1181:. This is good, and I would encourage other editors to help out with this. Short summaries like this are useful, and helps bring it in line with many other List of ... episodes articles. I think it may be a good idea to split the list into seasons to keep it more readable, but it would be easier to judge that once more summaries are written.
1584:
Should the long tildes remain?, making the second part "～Oinari-sama to Mote Mote no Tatari～", be translated as normal tildes?, making it "~Oinari-sama to Mote Mote no Tatari~", or not be translated at all?, leaving just "Oinari-sama to Mote Mote no Tatari"? Alternate suggestions may include treating
1250:
an idea that would serve the same purpose as your second point, and what comments were given were all in favor of the idea. I'm currently in the process of sifting through all of the episode summaries and condensing them into broader articles, which I hope to have done by the end of the weekend. Your
877:
Well, I was summoned here to say something about it, and here is my two cents: I'm completely indifferent to what names are used, as long as I'm familiar with both sets. According to what some of the people have said, it looks like Viz translates the names that they felt needed translation; all other
794:
On the manga side, the only info box I found was a book infobox. This is not very pleasant to use... it mentions illustrator and author, however, I'd like the field to either read creator, mangaka or have an option for those in addition to the author and illustrator. The cover art doesn't really mean
790:
On the Sailor Moon
Wikiproject we are using the TV series info boxes, however, this is a bit difficult to use because there are things that happen in animation that need to listed by episode sometimes. For example, a significant change or switch off in character designer, which is much more important
1301:
The second problem is the filler is not covered. Now, I've yet to find anyone who actually cares about the filler, but it should be important to include it, for the sake of completeness. Summaries of the filler arcs is particularly important, as coming this Spring, Part II will begin animation and
1297:
Those are great overviews of the important parts of the series, but there are two problems. Firstly, as it is, it can be difficult to work your way back from those articles to the exact point in the source material. Attempt to find out what episode some non-prominent event occurs in using
Knowledge,
1199:
Many articles could be summarized in a few sentences. Episode 208 could be summarized as "Kiba and Naruto are assigned to protect a expensive treasure. However, when the treasure they were protecting is destroyed, they find the real treasure was the client who hired them in the first place." That
1079:
It should be pointed out that this is actually the standard naming convention for WikiProjects, because the "WikiProject" at the start is considered to be a pseudo-namespace; hence, the actual title of the project—in this case, "anime and manga"—is capitalized into sentence case as though it was the
1207:
content is "The new three-man group Two people and a dog! (Japanese: 新生三人一組 二人と一匹！, - Shin'sei surīman seru futari to ippiki) is episode 144 of the anime series Naruto." and few templates. Yes, I know episode 144 is filler. That's not the point. The point is, it would be much easier to maintain,
2096:
which series they've seen. What we need to do is figure out how to get people that have seen the same series to work together more effectively. This is especially needed in articles where the editors may have seen the anime, but not have read the manga, so they can't compare the two and stuff like
1629:
For tildes, convert to single-space tildes and it would be okay. I don't think stars and music notes should be took as the page title, even it should be mentioned, at the start of the article, the full name with all these. This is because other editors cannot type in these symbols conveniently and
1605:
I'm all for keeping titles as official as they can be as romanizations. However, the stars (☆ or ★) do tend to have a too cluttered of a feel to warrent translating, as much as I hate to admit it. The tildes I'm not so sure about, I suppose I go with making them into normal tildes for ease of use,
2078:
It might be good to put this system on a shelf for a while. Maybe a different method could be used, like, "Collaboration requests", where people could post about multiple collaboration efforts they wish to push, and get x number of support to list it, or whatever. I do find it interesting on what
628:
That's been my experience. Citing looks kind of scary and complicated, but all it really boils down to is just saying exactly where you got something. On
Knowledge in particular, the formats vary all over the place, but the difference between a good citation and a bad one is simply whether or not
1613:
English translation. Also, feel free to bring up any other abnormal titles you happen to know about. As a final note, I'd like to point out these characters aren't just funny flurishes, but are usually part of the actual official
Japanese titles that our friends over in ja.wikipedia use in their
1945:
Well, generally, yes, but in our project we do need to strive to keep our still un-licensed anime/manga/games' titles as close to the
Japanese versions as possible. For example, we aren't suppose to refer to un-licensed anime/manga/games by popular un-official translations that they may have,
1682:
I don't like that thought at all. The first thing I think when I see a name space that doesn't match up with the bolded title is that "somebody must have moved the page and didn't update everything", after which I'll try to get the two to match up. I think making them different would be too
730:
Although, this creates another problem, most of us can't speak
Japanese.. and I'm not sure if Kunio Okawara speaks English. So after a request is written up, you'll likely need to find someone to translate it. You might try asking other Wikipedian editors who list themselves in
1277:. The article is already too long, and I believe we have a sort of half-consensus to stop. The existing summaries haven't been removed because we'd prefer to move them to a more appropriate place than to delete them. Anyway, here are the higher-level plot articles:
2067:
has been the
Collaboration of the "Week" for a month and a half now. I think this is a clear signal that nobody really cares about the collabortations :/ I propose dropping the system altogether. Or at the very least, push it back to be "Collaboration of the
1200:
is all that is needed. The article doesn't have to go into minute details about what jutsus (or whatever your prefered translation is), or a scene-by-scene retelling of the story. This is too much detail for a general encylopedia, even if wiki is not paper.
1168:
1160:
I'm posting this here in order to gauge consensus before I start making massive changes and spark a massive edit war. There are currently articles for all the episodes of Naruto through 209, except 204 and 205. I recently started an AfD for episode 208
433:
What I meant is that in the "Marco Polo" article, we're not supposed to have a section called "Travels of Marco Polo", but "Travels". I was wondering if we could have a "Naruto: the movie" section in "Naruto". Probably, as it's the commercial name of the
1694:
I think that in general we should avoid such characters in article titles, because they do not work in all browsers, and because they may break links (e.g. when copy/pasted into article text). We should instead use the ASCII equivalent, if any (e.g.
588:
I've been searching
Knowledge for the best way to reference individual volumes of manga but the best I could find is the format used to reference comic books. Is this acceptable format to use? Is there a format specifically used to reference manga?
1171:. I assume that any other deletion debates would go down the same path the last AfD did: the debate would inevitably turn towards the notability of all the Naruto episodes, or TV episodes in general, instead of discussion of the article at hand.
692:
Hi, I'm new here so I asked for permission if I can find a picture of Kunio
Okawara for the article since it was used for the collaboration of the week's article, so may I use the search engine to find a picture or is it not necessary to do that??
1955:
Eh, it doesn't really matter, though. I mean, who cares? A star in the title or not, doesn't really matter. If one will work on more computers than the other, and both are acceptable, and the full title can be seen in the article, then... I mean,
716:
However, this might be easier than some think. Do an image search anyways and see if you find any images taken by fans, then contact the person who took the image and ask them if they would be willing to license the image so we can use it.
1969:
Consistancy. Plus, I want to know what everyone thinks first before I go off, translate a bunch of these titles one way, then learn that everyone wants it the other way and have to go back and redo them. So I don't so much mind either
1384:). A filler arc article would be good, especially if you can dig up some critiques of the quality of the arc. You might want to name it "Anime only Naruto arcs" or similiar - "filler" implies the episodes are low quality. --
1515:, but I don't have the faintest idea on where to look for them. Finding anime reviews is hard enough, but visual novels are expensive, low selling, and (of course) entirely a Japanese market. I can find a few reviews for the
791:
in anime than it is American-side. Directors and Animation directors, etc will switch... It would be nice to have an anime-specific box with a forward back function that's agreed on by this project for other anime series.
711:). One of the ways Knowledge is stricter is that we can't use fair use images of living people, since the idea is that someone could take a picture of them and then release it under GFDL or Creative commons licenses.
202:
Hi people, just a word to let you know there is some pretty amazing work going on there. This will soon go through peer review, as it is GA, or even FA material. Any insight, advice, copyedit, formatting eagerly
1379:
My main reason I had splitting the article is to make it easier to access what you want from the sea of other stuff. I think an arc summary is a good idea as well. There is a pretty good start already, see
1408:
has somewhat of a derogatory slant to it, but you know what Shakespeare says. He refered to roses smelling sweet, but his words applies equally well to "anime only arcs" and their vile carrion stench. :D
2225:
is unique for treating comics as an artform, it looks to be one of our best bets for good published opinions. As far as manga goes at least. If anyone can happen to snag some copies that would be great.
2156:
Yup, it's dead. I wonder how/why the other projects manage to keep it alive? Is it a core of hard(core) editors that always accept the subject wether they like it or not, or a better choice of subjects?
1436:
1936:). Since there could be technical limitations, I'd say we should limit what we can (the stars and music symbols don't seem vital) for the title itself, but then follow the MOS for the content. --
134:
My fault. The user must have looked at my edits when I put the limited geographical scope note on the article back when. I was refering to the Gekidan Shiki WWII-based "Showa Trilogy" musicals:
798:
In general, I thought this would be useful to more than the SM fandom, so I'd like this project to figure it out so more people can use it evenly. It would be useful to have kicking around. --
2258:
and nothing else) has just one episode, but technical problems(?) in infobox animanga/drama prevented this to be shown properly (it needs an open and a end date). How should I do for that? --
1899:
Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration, or simply substitute for English words (e.g. ♥ used for "love"). In the article about a trademark,
703:
It's most likely that any images you find with an image search are copyrighted and not released with a free license. We generally can use copyrighted photos when we can't get free ones under
1478:
It's been peer-reviewed for a good while recently, and has gone through GAC after it. There's been a few very good comments recently in the FAC, some (like the fact that there's no ref from
188:
for a featured article. Right after it was elected, I started with the translation of the Russian article into English, and it is complete now. Please, read the details on the corresponding
1167:. I did this since I believed that this article was little more than plot summary, and was unlikely to become any more than that and the article was not very notable. The AfD closed with
647:
Since we're generally getting our information directly from scans of the chapters for in-progress series, it makes more sense imo to reference by page number within the chapter. (e.g.
1609:
I figured I might as well bring this up for discussion as I'm starting to run into more and more of these funky titles. And of course, all of this only applies to titles that have no
1302:
many people will come here looking to see what they missed (rather than suffering through the filler themselves). The immediate solution is obvious, I suppose. Create an article at
1219:
1163:
893:
This would be within the scope of the wikiproject AMP, so it needs some kind of heading, either says not rated, or has one with a grade... there is one over at his wife's page.... --
97:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
2057:
2097:
that. I also think it would be a good idea for members to post lists of which anime/manga they've seen so that we can tell on what articles we can collaberate effectively.
856:
Me and the other editor involved have sort of came to a standstill. Basically, we don't agree, but the other editors on the hxh talk page haven't bothered to comment.
2141:
I agree, there is no point keeping around a collaboration that no one uses. The series which have lots of viewers/readers are pretty much constantly active anyway. --
1435:
I've been foolhardy enough to nominate Lain for FAC. I'm not expecting it to pass, but to get impulse on how to make it better. Please leave comments and suggestions
762:
The same system goes, through the category of French speaking wikipedians. I happen to be a natural French speaker, so you can give me your text and I'll translate.--
1906:
So I'm confused, does that mean we should use them in the namespace or not? It's annoying that none of the discussions of this problem really seem to be resolved.--
1195:. I'm going to pick on episode 208, but only because that is the one I happened to nominate, and that article is similar to many other Naruto episode articles.
2079:
efforts are being done, but it's hard to make something like a normal collaboration of the week when it might not be something one is interested in editing. --
1204:
1683:
confusing. And double redirects shouldn't be much of a problem as long as it's not moved around, which shouldn't happen if we agree on which format to use. --
1846:
424:
We only need to disambiguate when necessary. If something is called Ah My Goddess the Movie or Naruto the Movie III then it doesn't need disambiguating. --
1810:
I'm not sure about this matter. Personally, I prefer using normal letters and things you can say out loud, but I don't feel strongly about it. I believe
47:
17:
1585:
long tiles as needing colons, such as "Ina Koi!: Oinari-sama to Mote Mote no Tatari" or replacing the tildes with some other character such as a dash.
1540:
718:
851:, if it exists, isn't egregiously bad, and is the generally-used name (a google test is appropriate here). Otherwise, use a literal transliteration.
812:
Just citing the episodes... there isn't one that works all that well. Could this project make up a citation template for anime episodes? Thanks. --
1211:
This level of detail makes Knowledge look silly. Episode 208's plot summary runs 601 words. The plot summary in the article on Shakespeares's
168:
to round out the coverage of Japanese musicals. None of us currently active at the musicals project have the background to do it. Thanks! --
1203:
Two hundred plus articles are hard to maintain. I just added a nav box to episode 208 to bring it more in line with other episode articles.
1036:
Yes, I do when discussing. The redirects aren't as precise because they ignore the other half of the project, and I hate the term animanga. --
991:
987:
350:
638:
One thing that's a tad bit of a problem is that often manga don't have page numbers. So I guess you have to be careful in your counting :/--
2244:
354:
1058:
I think he just finds it annoying. Let's get it moved to "Anime and Manga". capitlizing one but not the other does seem very illogical --
470:
tags to a ton of articles that don't need it. I don't have time to fix them all, but I did leave a note on his talk page. Here are his
1333:
happens in any given episode of Naruto, I agree with the idea that perhaps grouping them into seasons to summarize would be better. --
518:
1251:
third point seems as though it will carry over into the new articles in some areas, but that problem should be solved fairly easily.
1218:
Quite a few of the articles are plain lousy. I'm not an English teacher, but I know bad writing when I see it. Actually read over
471:
249:
150:
seiyu cast and the new breed from the 00's -- Prince of Tennis Musical and Rock Musical Bleach. And this is all not mentioning the
1715:
What is the ASCII equivalent for a musical note and a heart...? This would be seen in manga/anime titles often, as I foreseen... --
1486:, two books I do not have) will probably fail the FAC. If I get to all the others, I'll get a PR to make sure where it stands. --
1594:
1261:
656:
619:
1928:
Well, the namespace really isn't for the "official" way to spell something, just the more common and / or simpler way (i.e.
1769:
Na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-Katamari Damacy!...sorry, can't stop myself. Anyways, nobody seems to mind the title for
995:
674:
605:
182:
Hello, everyone. I am a member of the Russian Wikiproject Anime and have recently successfully nominated my article about
2384:
It probably doesn't need its own box in tbe first place. It should go in the "others" section with the movies and OVAs.--
2218:
2212:
2206:
2199:
2193:
2187:
2181:
2131:
I agree that the COTW should become inactive. Another thing that we have that isn't being used much is the to do list. --
925:
is within the scope of this wikiproject. And as far as i can see, it is tagged and does have a rating (rated as start) --
2161:
we should get back to it, we might want to focus more on finding sources, whitch is the main problem this project has.--
1985:
1440:
1355:
1247:
217:
750:
I find a site of Kunio Okawara's image but It's in French, so I don't know how to ask for the license of this photo,
2388:
2372:
2356:
2325:
2316:
2284:
2230:
2165:
2150:
2135:
2122:
2105:
2083:
2072:
2049:
2000:
1974:
1964:
1950:
1940:
1923:
1910:
1878:
1818:
1793:
1777:
1764:
1741:
1706:
1687:
1676:
1618:
1560:
1523:
1490:
1465:
1451:
1414:
1388:
1363:
1337:
1319:
1266:
1240:
1131:
1117:
1098:
1084:
1066:
1045:
1029:
1011:
969:
960:
947:
933:
916:
897:
882:
871:
830:
816:
802:
779:
766:
757:
743:
697:
681:
660:
642:
633:
623:
577:
567:
539:
526:
480:
438:
428:
419:
392:
379:
369:
335:
300:
277:
253:
224:
207:
196:
172:
158:
128:
1814:
stirred up a huge debate on the matter, maybe there is something in the talk page logs that might help us here. --
296:
template, but the template doesn't exist and it doesn't seem to have ever existed - no record in the deletion log.
38:
2092:
I like your idea. I think a large part of the problem of the current system is our members' specific knowledge to
1933:
1639:
1381:
1307:
1227:
1188:
1154:
1847:
Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(trademarks)#Use_of_decorative_analphabetic_characters_in_article_titles,_text
847:
Characters should be called what the series officially states their romaji names as. If that does not exist,
2349:
2309:
2277:
2042:
1995:
1871:
1734:
1669:
1428:
1274:
1192:
1178:
1148:
860:
842:
1843:
1840:
1581:
Should the title be translated with star, as "Ina☆Koi!", or by reading the star as a space, as "Ina Koi!"?
328:
260:
237:
1552:
1456:
Peer reviews are hit-or-miss compared to FAC. Peer reviews sometimes don't even get any replies at all. --
1230:
to be improved. If that is the only thing that comes out of this longish spiel, I'll be happy with that.
513:
290:
1786:, I found out there are actually two series named that -_-. The real series that got licensed is a yaoi,
412:, have dropped the qualifier). We shouldn't add "the movie", however, when it wasn't a part of the title.
2098:
1303:
823:
554:
article? While it isn't bad, it's still labeled as a stub, which is sad, because it was a great show.--
245:
1290:
1089:
I'd prefer we do away with the camelcase in WikiProjEcT as well, but that would require wider input. --
986:
The current title capitalization is inconsistent and highly irritating to type. We should be at either
1280:
1979:
I'd be strongly in favour of including such symbols, to make article titles as correct as possible. —
1916:
614:
Not that I'm aware of, no. For all intents and purposes, a book reference format should work fine. --
593:
2132:
1310:. The article in my sandbox isn't complete, but it should give you some idea of what I'm thinking,
1114:
903:
Sorry, I'm having difficulty understanding you. Are you asking someone to add a project template to
425:
408:
As for "Blah blah: The Movie", then that's possibly the actual title (though several films, such as
332:
1255:
1081:
464:
317:
267:
1597:" (as I have it now), or should the note be left out, making it just "Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro"?
2331:
2291:
2259:
2176:
2024:
1990:
1980:
1853:
1716:
1700:
1651:
1258:
966:
894:
879:
813:
799:
736:
732:
708:
117:
2290:
SeizureDog, I saw your edit-- but do you think October 2-October 2 is a bit weird-looking...? --
1811:
1756:
1750:
415:
Anyway, someone has already changed it, so I suppose the discussion is moot at this point : ) -
562:
1903:, but thereafter, an alternative that follows the standard rules of punctuation should be used
1696:
1631:
1544:
1411:
1360:
1316:
1080:
entire page title. (In other words, one might think of it as "WikiProject:Anime and manga".)
922:
904:
601:
490:
1783:
2146:
1461:
1351:
1350:
Grouping them by season doesn't work very well. Grouping by arc might be more efficent, as
1127:
1094:
1059:
1041:
1007:
953:
943:
926:
912:
864:
457:
241:
240:
is apparently not used. Where are the covers put? What licensing tag is used for them? --
151:
1787:
1208:
for example, seperate seasons of Naruto with short plot summaries instead of 200+ articles.
388:
I think there's a guideline saying we shouldn't repeat the article name in the subtitles.--
375:
One point: often anime-based films actually have "Blah blah: The Movie" as their titles. --
2385:
2369:
2322:
2227:
2102:
2069:
1971:
1947:
1920:
1907:
1894:
1849:
1790:
1774:
1761:
1684:
1615:
1520:
1334:
1026:
1022:
1018:
639:
574:
165:
121:
107:
1770:
1447:
Shouldn't you take the article to peer review first if you are sure it won't pass FAC? --
2366:
My solution is to make the last run field optional, as I have done in these two edits.
2119:
2080:
1961:
1937:
1815:
1405:
1285:
776:
754:
740:
694:
555:
486:
362:
143:
2064:
1109:
This was discussed in October as well. I'll point out again that the WikiProject was
827:
775:
Posted it on your discussion page titled "Text", thanks for translation of the text.
722:
678:
630:
532:
477:
376:
216:
Just as Sidi predicted, I have nominated the article for a peer review - please, see
169:
147:
125:
114:
1839:
For discussions over the heart symbol, I found the following articles to be useful:
2020:
1929:
1502:
1385:
1237:
597:
536:
221:
193:
155:
1901:
it is acceptable to use decorative characters the first time the trademark appears
2245:
Template talk:Infobox animanga/Drama#"Original Run" and One-shot (tanpatsu) drama
2251:
2142:
1699:) or a space, and explain in the article text that the name includes a symbol. (
1457:
1448:
1123:
1090:
1037:
1003:
939:
908:
652:
615:
297:
274:
189:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1298:
but without referring to the individual episode articles. It can be difficult.
551:
2162:
1487:
763:
725:
directly to see if he'd be willing to license one of his own personal photos.
435:
389:
204:
124:. I don't know much about it, but I figured someone here could take a peak.--
120:
to take a look at the brief coverage of anime and manga inspired musicals in
751:
416:
366:
135:
1233:
Please provide comments on this suggestion. I look forward to your input.
146:(early Sailor Moon musicals). There was the long run of Kayou Shows by the
192:. This message is there solely to let you know that something is up. :) --
1754:
anyone? The use of a heart in the title space seems minorly standard, as
1630:
this would easily cause a large number of double directs.So it should be
1511:
849:
use what they are named in the most recent or popular English translation
721:
shows an example of how to do this. You might also want to try to e-mail
704:
1226:
If nothing else, I would like to see some of the individual articles in
535:. Seems there's more than what he's entered that need to be removed. --
1358:. Especially for the filler arcs, as they are completely autonomous. –
405:
I didn't understand the last comment by $ yD, could you please clarify?
2330:
Well, maybe, but my point is whether the template can be de"bug"-ed.--
1122:
Then let's move it back there. Why was it moved in the first place? --
573:
I don't think it's really a stub, so I bumped it up to Start class. --
1212:
184:
2217:, and they've reviewed even more in print. There's also the article
1572:
What should the standard be for translating non-standard characters?
859:
So i'm hoping a few people here can come over and give a comment at
1789:
and does use the star in the middle even in the English version. --
1017:
Do you actually type out the whole thing? You know you can just do
2180:
does reviews of manga sometimes. Reviews availible online are for
707:, but Knowledge has stricter fair use guidelines and policy (see
1748:
Of course! I just thought of a good example of the heart usage.
139:
1519:
anime, but I want/need to focus on the game first. Any ideas?--
1177:
There is already work under way to include short summaries in
1002:
not have Anime capitalized but manga in lower case? Thanks. --
861:
Talk:Hunter × Hunter#A call of opinion regarding naming in HxH
25:
998:. I have no preference for either capitalization, but can we
1782:
In my searching to find an image of the English version of
1567:
End cross-post. Please do not comment more in this section.
938:
Yeah, that was me. It wasn't when he made the complaint. --
327:
parameter and if type=manga then the image is added to the
1184:
And now the part I expect will ruffle the most feathers:
1215:
article runs 585 words. Something is out of whack here.
735:, which means they are a Native speaker of Japanese. Or
2367:
1760:
also uses one. And these are English titles mind you.--
1164:
Rare artifact, The importance of the Beauties of Nature
1110:
1509:
Specifically, I'm looking for something I can use for
361:. Thought I would bring it up here, rather than just "
1541:
Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team#Stablepedia
550:Hello. Could anyone of you attempt to improve the
331:
instead of the default category for book covers. --
351:Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga#Article name
845:regarding naming conventions. specifically, the "
357:, I might suggest that the section be changed to
154:'s Tezuka musicals like Berimyu and Black Jack --
1543:. If you wish to comment, please comment there.
313:If the category is to be populated then perhaps
2219:"A Comics Reader's Guide to Manga Scanlations"
323:could be edited so that there is an optional
8:
142:(Kiki, Saint Seiya, Hime-chan no Ribbon) or
629:people can find what you're referencing. --
2239:Infobox animanga/drama issue with oneshots
2118:ooo, I like that ANN seen list idea :D --
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
2058:Anime and Manga Collaboration of the Week
1946:simplier and more popular they may be. --
719:Knowledge:Example requests for permission
2174:On that note, I recently found out that
1306:, and make it look something like this:
837:Can anyone give a third opinion on this?
786:Manga Volume and Anime Episode Infoboxes
531:I'll run clean-up on the whole cat with
1222:. That is not my idea of good writing.
474:, for cleanup purposes. Have fun. : -->
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1187:I think that many of the articles in
992:Knowledge:WikiProject anime and manga
988:Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and Manga
489:lets you roll back multiple edits. —
7:
1915:Another thing to note. ♪ is part of
996:Wikipeda:Wikiproject anime and manga
355:Knowledge:Naming conventions (films)
286:Weird, the category says to use the
2254:'s drama(The TV station calls it a
1273:We don't want the summaries on the
841:Just recently had a long debate on
24:
2063:If anyone's bothered to notice,
29:
1642:, but start the article with "
1144:The articles this affects are:
822:For what it's worth, check out
677:. Seems the closest analogue.--
164:Please add some information to
2321:Better than the alternative.--
1576:I give the following examples:
1:
2389:08:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2373:08:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2357:08:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2326:08:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2317:08:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2285:07:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2231:15:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
2166:09:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
2151:20:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2136:10:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2123:06:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2106:06:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2084:05:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
2073:23:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
2001:19:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1975:08:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1965:08:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1951:08:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1941:06:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1924:05:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1911:05:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1879:04:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1819:03:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1794:02:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1778:00:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1765:23:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1742:14:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1707:12:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1688:10:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1677:10:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1619:09:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1561:23:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1524:08:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1491:13:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1466:00:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1452:22:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1415:00:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1389:20:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1364:20:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1338:10:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1320:06:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1267:06:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1241:06:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1132:09:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1118:10:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1099:03:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1085:02:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1067:02:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1046:03:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1030:01:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1012:09:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
970:02:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
961:09:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
948:08:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
934:08:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
917:06:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
898:02:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
883:04:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
872:10:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
831:00:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
817:22:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
803:08:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
780:13:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
767:13:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
758:12:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
744:08:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
682:17:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
675:Template:Comic book reference
225:18:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
208:12:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
2050:11:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
982:Project title capitalization
698:21:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
673:For what it's worth, I used
661:20:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
643:19:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
634:07:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
624:05:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
578:00:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
568:11:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
540:15:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
527:14:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
481:07:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
439:12:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
429:11:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
420:11:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
393:09:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
380:04:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
370:22:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
336:03:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
301:09:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
278:09:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
254:05:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
220:. Everyone is invited. :) --
218:Knowledge:Peer review/MADLAX
197:16:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
173:04:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
159:02:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
129:00:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
2252:Detective Conan/Case Closed
2019:New policy over these. See
1501:Any ideas on where to find
878:names were transliterated.
2411:
1644:Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪
1595:Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪
1329:Considering that not much
1113:spelt with a capital M. --
752:The photo of Kunio Okawara
1934:William Jefferson Clinton
1640:Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro
1593:Should it be translated "
1480:scenario experiments lain
1382:List of Naruto story arcs
1308:User:Gunslinger47/Sandbox
952:oh...ehh...sorry then. --
2250:The main issue here is,
2200:an anthology containing
2021:WP:NC#Special_characters
1919:, but ☆ and ★ aren't. --
1773:, so I think it's okay.
1578:いな☆こい! ～お稲荷さまとモテモテのたたり～
1228:Category:Naruto episodes
1189:Category:Naruto episodes
1155:Category:Naruto episodes
1140:Naruto Episodes Clean-up
2099:List of anime I've seen
1484:visual experiments lain
1429:Serial Experiments Lain
1275:list of Naruto episodes
1193:List of Naruto episodes
1179:List of Naruto episodes
1149:List of Naruto episodes
739:(near native), etc. --
298:Confusing Manifestation
275:Confusing Manifestation
2183:Strawberry Marshmallow
1960:is the issue here? --
1895:WP:MOSTM#General rules
1850:WP:MOSTM#General rules
1191:should be merged into
651:chapter x, page y.) --
261:Image:X vol1 cover.gif
2195:Welcome to the N.H.K.
1534:Beginning cross-post.
824:Template:Cite episode
657:Now on editor review!
620:Now on editor review!
329:Category:Manga covers
238:Category:Manga covers
233:Category:Manga covers
42:of past discussions.
1917:Windows Glyph List 4
1614:article namespace.--
843:Talk:Hunter × Hunter
472:recent contributions
1634:, but start with "
1601:My personal opinion
410:Superman: The Movie
2223:The Comics Journal
2177:The Comics Journal
1844:Talk:I ♥ Huckabees
1841:Talk:We ♥ Katamari
1304:Naruto filler arcs
737:Category:User ja-4
733:Category:User ja-N
709:Knowledge:Fair use
2354:
2314:
2282:
2149:
2047:
1876:
1739:
1674:
1556:
1549:
1464:
1291:Plot of Naruto II
1130:
1097:
1044:
1010:
994:, (or maybe even
946:
923:Yoshihiro Togashi
915:
905:Yoshihiro Togashi
889:Yoshihiro Togashi
808:Citation of Anime
659:
622:
610:
596:comment added by
584:Referencing Manga
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2402:
2353:
2350:
2346:
2343:
2340:
2337:
2334:
2313:
2310:
2306:
2303:
2300:
2297:
2294:
2281:
2278:
2274:
2271:
2268:
2265:
2262:
2145:
2046:
2043:
2039:
2036:
2033:
2030:
2027:
1993:
1988:
1983:
1875:
1872:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1859:
1856:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1725:
1722:
1719:
1703:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1663:
1660:
1657:
1654:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1460:
1352:User:Someguy0830
1281:Plot of Naruto I
1153:The articles in
1126:
1093:
1064:
1040:
1006:
958:
942:
931:
911:
869:
655:
618:
609:
590:
566:
558:
525:
510:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
469:
463:
458:User:Angel,Isaac
322:
316:
295:
289:
272:
266:
152:Takarazuka Revue
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2410:
2409:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2351:
2344:
2341:
2338:
2335:
2332:
2311:
2304:
2301:
2298:
2295:
2292:
2279:
2272:
2269:
2266:
2263:
2260:
2241:
2061:
2044:
2037:
2034:
2031:
2028:
2025:
1991:
1986:
1981:
1873:
1866:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1854:
1736:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1701:
1671:
1664:
1661:
1658:
1655:
1652:
1650:Just my 0.02.--
1590:ノストラダムスに聞いてみろ♪
1574:
1553:
1545:
1531:
1507:
1433:
1174:But I digress.
1142:
1060:
984:
954:
927:
891:
865:
839:
810:
788:
690:
591:
586:
560:
556:
548:
523:
512:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
492:
491:
467:
461:
455:
348:
320:
314:
293:
287:
270:
264:
235:
180:
166:musical theatre
122:Musical theatre
111:
108:Musical theatre
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2408:
2406:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2240:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2169:
2168:
2139:
2138:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2087:
2086:
2060:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
1905:
1897:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1710:
1709:
1691:
1690:
1648:
1647:
1626:
1625:
1624:Your thoughts?
1603:
1602:
1589:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1564:
1563:
1530:
1527:
1506:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1432:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1324:
1323:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1288:
1286:Kakashi Gaiden
1283:
1270:
1269:
1236:Believe it! --
1224:
1223:
1216:
1209:
1201:
1158:
1157:
1151:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1082:Kirill Lokshin
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
983:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
963:
890:
887:
886:
885:
838:
835:
834:
833:
809:
806:
787:
784:
783:
782:
772:
771:
770:
769:
747:
746:
727:
726:
713:
712:
689:
686:
685:
684:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
585:
582:
581:
580:
563:Wikipedophiles
561:(I don't like
547:
544:
543:
542:
529:
519:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
413:
406:
398:
397:
396:
395:
383:
382:
347:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
306:
305:
304:
303:
281:
280:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
211:
210:
203:appreciated.--
179:
176:
162:
161:
144:Sakurakko Club
110:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2407:
2390:
2387:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2371:
2368:
2358:
2355:
2347:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2315:
2307:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2283:
2275:
2257:
2253:
2248:
2246:
2238:
2232:
2229:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2215:
2210:
2209:
2204:
2203:
2197:
2196:
2191:
2190:
2185:
2184:
2179:
2178:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2167:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2137:
2134:
2130:
2124:
2121:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2107:
2104:
2100:
2095:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2085:
2082:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2071:
2066:
2065:Kunio Okawara
2059:
2055:
2051:
2048:
2040:
2022:
2018:
2017:
2002:
1999:
1998:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1973:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1963:
1959:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1949:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1909:
1904:
1902:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1880:
1877:
1869:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1820:
1817:
1813:
1812:I ♥ Huckabees
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1795:
1792:
1788:
1785:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1759:
1758:
1757:I ♥ Huckabees
1753:
1752:
1751:We ♥ Katamari
1747:
1743:
1740:
1732:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1708:
1704:
1698:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1686:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1675:
1667:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1628:
1627:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1596:
1591:
1588:Next example:
1586:
1582:
1579:
1571:
1569:
1568:
1562:
1559:
1551:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1528:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1513:
1504:
1500:
1492:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1442:
1438:
1430:
1427:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1366:
1365:
1362:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1260:
1257:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:Episode 144's
1202:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1194:
1190:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1156:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1139:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
981:
971:
968:
967:Hitsuji Kinno
964:
962:
959:
957:
951:
950:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
932:
930:
924:
920:
919:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
899:
896:
895:Hitsuji Kinno
888:
884:
881:
880:Ron Stoppable
876:
875:
874:
873:
870:
868:
862:
857:
854:
852:
850:
844:
836:
832:
829:
825:
821:
820:
819:
818:
815:
814:Hitsuji Kinno
807:
805:
804:
801:
800:Hitsuji Kinno
796:
792:
785:
781:
778:
774:
773:
768:
765:
761:
760:
759:
756:
753:
749:
748:
745:
742:
738:
734:
729:
728:
724:
723:Kunio Okawara
720:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
687:
683:
680:
676:
672:
671:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
645:
644:
641:
637:
636:
635:
632:
627:
626:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
583:
579:
576:
572:
571:
570:
569:
564:
559:
553:
545:
541:
538:
534:
530:
528:
524:
522:
517:
514:
511:
488:
485:
484:
483:
482:
479:
473:
466:
459:
452:
440:
437:
432:
431:
430:
427:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
411:
407:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
394:
391:
387:
386:
385:
384:
381:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
345:
337:
334:
330:
326:
319:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
302:
299:
292:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
276:
269:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
232:
226:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
206:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
191:
187:
186:
177:
175:
174:
171:
167:
160:
157:
153:
149:
148:Sakura Taisen
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
123:
119:
116:
109:
106:Questions on
105:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2365:
2255:
2249:
2242:
2222:
2213:
2207:
2201:
2194:
2188:
2182:
2175:
2158:
2140:
2093:
2062:
1996:
1957:
1930:Bill Clinton
1900:
1898:
1784:Lucky ☆ Star
1755:
1749:
1649:
1643:
1638:is ...", or
1635:
1610:
1608:
1604:
1592:
1587:
1583:
1580:
1575:
1566:
1565:
1533:
1532:
1516:
1510:
1508:
1503:visual novel
1483:
1479:
1434:
1412:Gunslinger47
1410:
1361:Gunslinger47
1359:
1330:
1317:Gunslinger47
1315:
1311:
1253:
1252:
1235:
1232:
1225:
1186:
1183:
1176:
1173:
1169:no consensus
1162:
1159:
1143:
1061:
999:
985:
955:
928:
892:
866:
858:
855:
848:
846:
840:
811:
797:
793:
789:
691:
648:
592:— Preceding
587:
549:
520:
515:
456:
409:
358:
349:
324:
236:
183:
181:
163:
112:
78:
43:
37:
2243:I refer to
1932:instead of
1529:Stablepedia
1220:episode 208
487:Vandalproof
460:just added
346:"The Movie"
291:manga cover
36:This is an
2386:SeizureDog
2323:SeizureDog
2228:SeizureDog
2163:SidiLemine
2103:SeizureDog
2070:SeizureDog
1972:SeizureDog
1948:SeizureDog
1921:SeizureDog
1908:SeizureDog
1791:SeizureDog
1771:Lucky☆Star
1762:SeizureDog
1685:SeizureDog
1616:SeizureDog
1521:SeizureDog
1488:SidiLemine
1439:or on the
1356:suggesting
1335:SeizureDog
1248:brought up
1111:originally
1027:SeizureDog
965:Thanks. --
863:Thanks. --
764:SidiLemine
688:Permission
640:SeizureDog
575:SeizureDog
552:Saint Tail
546:Saint Tail
465:manga-stub
436:SidiLemine
390:SidiLemine
318:book cover
268:book cover
205:SidiLemine
98:Archive 15
90:Archive 13
85:Archive 12
79:Archive 11
73:Archive 10
2214:Dr. Slump
2133:Squilibob
2120:Ned Scott
2081:Ned Scott
2068:Month".--
2056:Drop the
1962:Ned Scott
1938:Ned Scott
1816:Ned Scott
1441:talk page
1312:dattebayo
1115:Squilibob
1025:right? --
853:" part.
777:Rakuten06
755:Rakuten06
741:Ned Scott
695:Rakuten06
557:Saoshyant
453:Stub tags
426:Squilibob
333:Squilibob
190:talk page
136:Ri Kohran
68:Archive 9
60:Archive 5
2221:. Since
2202:Norakuro
1697:Ina*Koi!
1636:Ina☆Koi!
1632:Ina Koi!
1611:official
1517:Shuffle!
1512:Shuffle!
1505:reviews?
1023:WP:ANIME
1019:WP:MANGA
828:Monocrat
705:fair use
679:Monocrat
631:Masamage
606:contribs
594:unsigned
521:contribs
478:Masamage
434:piece.--
377:Masamage
365:" : ) -
170:Ssilvers
126:Monocrat
118:asked me
2208:Negima!
1982:Nightst
1702:Radiant
1386:Phirazo
1256:Snapper
1238:Phirazo
1062:`/aksha
956:`/aksha
929:`/aksha
867:`/aksha
598:Blanko4
537:Kunzite
363:Be bold
242:HKMarks
222:Koveras
194:Koveras
156:Kunzite
39:archive
2256:dorama
2211:, and
2143:tjstrf
1970:way.--
1646:is..."
1555:ROCKER
1548:MESSED
1458:tjstrf
1449:Mika1h
1406:Filler
1331:really
1213:Hamlet
1124:tjstrf
1091:tjstrf
1038:tjstrf
1004:tjstrf
1000:please
940:tjstrf
909:tjstrf
653:tjstrf
649:series
616:tjstrf
475:_: -->
359:(film)
353:- Per
259:Well,
185:MADLAX
178:MADLAX
1992:llion
1958:where
1893:From:
325:type=
263:uses
16:<
2352:TALK
2312:TALK
2280:TALK
2189:Emma
2147:talk
2094:only
2045:TALK
2023:. --
1874:TALK
1737:TALK
1672:TALK
1539:See
1462:talk
1437:here
1128:talk
1095:talk
1042:talk
1008:talk
944:talk
913:talk
907:? --
602:talk
417:jc37
367:jc37
140:SMAP
115:user
2370:_dk
2348:--
2342:urt
2339:l C
2336:mue
2308:--
2302:urt
2299:l C
2296:mue
2276:--
2270:urt
2267:l C
2264:mue
2041:--
2035:urt
2032:l C
2029:mue
1997:(?)
1870:--
1864:urt
1861:l C
1858:mue
1775:_dk
1733:--
1727:urt
1724:l C
1721:mue
1668:--
1662:urt
1659:l C
1656:mue
1482:or
1354:is
1314:. –
1021:or
990:or
921:...
826:.--
533:AWB
2345:is
2333:Sa
2305:is
2293:Sa
2273:is
2261:Sa
2247:.
2226:--
2205:,
2198:,
2192:,
2186:,
2159:If
2101:--
2038:is
2026:Sa
1867:is
1855:Sa
1852:--
1730:is
1718:Sa
1705:)
1665:is
1653:Sa
1443:.
1431:FA
1246:I
608:)
604:•
505:ar
502:ik
499:Sh
496:rk
493:Da
476:--
468:}}
462:{{
321:}}
315:{{
294:}}
288:{{
271:}}
265:{{
252:)
113:A
94:→
64:←
1987:a
1557:★
1546:★
1409:–
1380:(
1262:o
1259:T
1254:~
600:(
565:)
516:/
508:i
250:C
248:/
246:T
244:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.