Knowledge

Talk:Madlax

Source 📝

996:. It is not, however, a good source for the artbook. It would be better to just source the book itself, or maybe the official site? No, on the ebay link. Is there anything on the official site? Amazon.co.jp? A more well known retailer? Citing episodes is fine for character stuff and straight statements of facts (i.e. something explicitly said in the series), but themes is interprative and must be sourced apart from the series. Otherwise, its basically the editing editors view of what the series themes are, not what reliable sources consider the themes to be. And no on the screenshot, per 32: 453:, and I can see no valid reason for it to be an exception to following it. There are also general MoS issues, such as a mix of American and International date formats, when should all be American. There are many refs in the lead when the lead should be a proper summation of the article, not an introducer of new information. The see also is unnecessary when the series has a template. Additionally, the article has an excessive amount of non-free images, which violates 1886:
it doesn't get delisted as a FA because of the questionable accuracy of ANN's encyclopedia. In fact, I am going through the same thing trying to find credible sources for voice actors etc. It is a lot of work tracking down RS for animes. As for the English VA's, did a dubbed version of Madlax air on any North American channels? If so, try searching the channel's official website to see if you can find a credits page with the English VAs. -
313: 1832:. No single series actor list contains the same information. And as for unreliability, falsifying main cast credits is extremely uncommon even on user-edited sites, so I don't see how it is a concern in this particular case. Considering the above-mentioned advantage of a compiled roles list, I am tempted to perceive the above criticism as following the letter of the reference reliability guidelines more than their spirit. -- 1562:. I think putting the track listings within the article would make it too long and be too distracting and I see no reason why we cannot have a summary of the music in the main article and link to the track listings in a separate article. There is a lot of additional information about the albums that would be lost unless the contents of the track listing article are kept intact (e.g. the contents in the InfoBoxes). 220: 230: 199: 168: 570:
close enough to MOS. About the characters section: we can merge it with plot summary (adding the character list link as see also and the collage picture to the top) but it'd require some tweaking because right now characters section is like a synopsis of the show, containing some details necessary to understand the summary. --
1885:
Those look good in terms of RS. TV Tokyo was the first to broadcast Madlax, so I assume they do have correct staff credits. Same for Victor Entertainment's page on Noir. Also, I hope you don't take my comments as some sort of attack on the hard work you put into this article! Just trying to make sure
1808:, the encyclopedia portion of Anime News Network is not considered a reliable source because it is user edited. This ANN encyclopedia section is cited for references #15-20 concerning the voice actors. Is there some other reliable internet source that can be used for production and cast information? - 1499:
Well, track listings are available at the Victor Entertainment website (which is cited as reference in the main article), so technically, it'd be a copyright violation to copy-paste them onto here. And the fact that "I'm here" was only published on the single should be mentioned in the Music section.
1116:
Whoa, seriously...isn't that like more illegal? The quote thing is just plain odd... :-P It is always kinda interesting to see how different the various language wikis are. The Japan one, for example, seems to not care abouts refs at all. I've yet to hit one of their articles and find a reference (or
1846:
say not to use ANN's encyclopedia section for such information? The second reason being that I also used ANN's encyclopedia as a cited reference for voice actors and other information, but when I requested a reassessment of an article using ANN encyclopedia references, I was told that was one of the
1384:
I've tagged the album list for merging back here. Really, this article already seems to cover all of the pertinent album information, and the list is basically an excuse to give track listings and excessive (and policy violating) non-free images. It adds nothing to the article and is unnecessary. --
991:
notability requirements, its just no one has made an article yet (I debated it, but alas Chris doesn't really have much about the history of the site available). IMDB is not a reliable source, this is per massive consensus by multiple projects and the RS noticeboard. It is user edit, same as a wiki.
1823:
The most reliable source are the credits at the end of the episodes, but Knowledge seems strangely prejudiced against it... Otherwise, an official website should have a list of main characters with voice actors, but the official site gives me a 404. I also imagine some volume reviews containing the
1763:
The correct way of dealing with information on Knowledge you perceive as erroneous is to find a source that claims the opposite and add it to the article with a write-up along the lines of "However, other critics have found the shoujo-ai content of the series weak to non-existent, compared to other
1702:
though I get the impression there should be one album per article. Actually, I get the impression that maybe there should be something a bit more specific for Anime/J-POP. Side comment: I find it ironic that some of you want to remove some of the information about the music in an Anime series where
1247:
Hmmm...probably not at this point. The site was sold to mania.com so technically "AnimeOnDVD.com" doesn't truly exist anymore, its the anime/manga section of mania.com. All links will also need to be updated to either use archive versions from the Web Archive or find the new URL on the new site. --
1218:
Sorry, it's been two weeks since the last update but I've finally finished rewriting the lead. I hope it's OK like this. Now all that's left is trimming the story sections. I still say that we need to merge the characters into plot because if we trim the latter any more, it'll stop making any sense
1036:
I've commented out the resin kit statement, just for the clean record. If I don't find any sources, I'll remove it altogether. This is why I sometimes hat Knowledge: if something obviously exists (and I've seen that figure with my own eyes) but none of the sources are "reliable", it doesn't exist.
969:
Lastly (and I foresee this to be the main sticking point), there is an issue of citing episodes in the Themes section. Back in my days (I mean, when this FAC came to be), it was OK to cite the original material, as long as it didn't constitute the main mass of refs and concerned the story. I think
693:
Ah, looking closer, your right, though some partial dates are improperly wikified when they shouldn't be. I've fixed those along with making the MoS changes and will mark the sources momentarily. Excel Saga isn't a good example to use right now, as it is already at FAR and seems well on its way to
457:. The anime box set image belongs in the ep list and isn't needed here at all. The image of the bible adds nothing to the article and is not critically discussed in its section. The two character images are excessive when there is already a single character image containing the major characters. 1670:
No, that isn't the problem. The problem is, should it have been split out. The articles this one links to does not, generally, affect its FAR status. Its an issue of MoS compliance and unnecessary splits. Would this article benefit more to have the page merged back? Could the list survive an AfD,
569:
Well, it's not like I can't see them at all, just that you've given me one heck of a job so I'm trying to sort it out a bit. ^^ Anyhow, I'm gonna do the date formatting in the next few hours. And about MOS, it's just too huge. :-/ I generally work by the "best practice" rules which usually stick
1847:
major problems that had to be addressed before it could be reassessed upwards. In any case, given that the policy is so clear, and very sensible as well (user edited content is by definition not reliable), I would suggest finding alternative references for the voice actors if at all possible. -
1066:
Bullets are fine, does make it easy to reference stuff :P I've wondered the same on #2, but I'll usually put it in anyway just to avoid the issue at FAC (and except for things like manga lists, I think we don't usually put ISBNs in the text itself, but I could be wrong). For #3, yes, it can be
597:
and the stumbling block to sending it for FA. The copyeditor pointed it out, which is why I spotted it here :P Our MoS suggests a bullet list, but more and more our we're finding that moving to paragraphs is preferred when the article heads to peer review. If you want, I can do the basic
1195:
The two-line paragraph ("Madlax has gained fame among the shōjo-ai fandom...") in the "Themes" section can be used as the caption for the "Madlax and Vanessa" image. Likewise, the information on "Margaret and Madlax's connection to each other" can be used with the "Three personae"
538:
is fairly straight forward, but if you aren't seeing what's off, I can point out or fix. The character section counts as plot, and the character here is extremely long when there is already a full character list, and it seems to repeat some stuff already in the plot section. --
1222:
There is also the matter with images: I think the idea for the caption of Vanessa and Madlax's image in the Themes is very good, but I still have trouble formulating a good caption for the three personae screenshot. :( Could someone please take over this task for me?..
644:
formatted consistently (international style AFAIU)... Can it be that you have an automatic date formatting preference set? In that case, it automatically transforms all wikilinked dates to your preferred format but leaves the rest of them as they are in the source
1067:
frustrating, I know, but on Knowledge the sky is not blue unless a reliable source says so ;) For the image, probably on the OST, though my personal preference is to have one representative cover in the section. It would probably get a ping in a FAR though. --
1000:. Unnecessary images will quickly get pounced on in FAs, and such a screenshot, without actual analytic discussion about it, will be considered decorative. The image in the infobox is sufficient for giving an idea of the visual style of the series. -- 1032:
I've changed the ref for the artbook but what you said about citing it itself got me wondering: do we even need an inline citation for the fact that the book has been published if we have the ISBN number which anyone can verify via integrated book
1841:
I raise this issue for two reasons, the first being surprise at the discovery of unreliable sources in a Featured Article. How were such references overlooked by the reviewer(s) who classified this as a Featured Article, when WP Anime and Manga's
1106:
image into the infobox... Oh, and another cool thing is German Wikiquote which allows three quotes per series because a fourth would be copyright violation. %) PS: Sorry, it was off the topic, but I had to say it out loud somewhere.. :(
1199:
Of course, you can always upload new images (and come up with new captions) that complement the current text. Also, you could move the infobox image to "Characters", and upload a DVD cover for the infobox, so the article won't feel as
1101:
Actually, this craze about the images kinda reminds me of German Knowledge already, where no non-free images are allowed whatsoever. In case of anime articles, the users have to create SVGs of series' logos, just to be able to place
505:
I also have trouble understanding the "plot summary too long" notice: three paragraphs were considered OK back when the article was first nominated, and complex plot is one of the highlights of the series, as noted in the reception
534:. The Date MoS notes the article should use consistent format. Since American was the first used in the article, it should be used throughout (except, of course, the refs which use ISO). Why can't you work on proper compliance? 489:"Not in proper compliance" is not something I can work upon. If you can't be bold, at least help me find the non-compliant parts. I'll fix all dates for now. Btw, where does it say in MOS that it should be American date format? 2051:
Reading through this article has me thinking that this does not meet FA standards. Just skimming through it comes off as it being bare and not well-researched on the anime. Just thinking this needs a complete overhaul.
1467:
If you keep the list intact then I do not see a problem with the merge. If not then I vote for a separate article. If you do do a merge but eliminate the track listings then I think the following should be mentioned:
2126: 1633:
No, merge discussions generally take place on the target page. If the consensus is no merge, then discussion must happen on the album list to remove all tracklists and properly comply with a discography list. --
663:
About the MoS adjustments, I don't mind, as long as you have time. I've already admitted that I'm not fit with the official policies. ^^ And while you are on it, you can also pinpoint the unreliable sources. ;)
1585:(edit conflict) The track listings would not be put in here, nor do they belong in the album article. The infoboxes add nothing that can't be more quickly said in prose. Albums is not the guideline here, but 45: 1693:
I posted on the discography project's talk page asking for some guidenance -- e.g. it appears to more geared towards artists right now and I don't think they have an official MOS yet. I noticed that the
1593:, track listings do not go in discography pages either. Also, as Koveras notes, for the albums to be kept separate, history and critical reviews (from reliable sites, not fansites), must be addable. -- 406:"Heroic bloodshed" should be the first to go. 1) It's not really a genre; 2) it is commonly associated with Hong Kong action films, specifically those directed by John Woo; and 3) beyond the gun-play, 1805: 740:
Heck, that's some load of tags... *scratches head* I'll see what I can do in the next few days. I think we should place a tag that the article is being revamped at the moment, or something... --
1159:
If it were up to me, I would have removed the boxset, OST and "Bible" images, and kept the "Madlax and Vanessa" and "Three personae" images. The last two just needed better, more descriptive
831:
Sorry about the delays but I've suddenly got a lot of stuff to do IRL. :( I've copied the article to my home wiki and am tweaking it there, I'll post the end result here when it's done... --
1656:
That's what I meant. I mean, the real problem from this article's standpoint is we are linking to something that doesn't meet FAR status so it affects this article's status, correct?
1182:
I do have them on the hard drive but I'm afraid I cannot come up with "descriptive captions" on my own. :( I need inspiration and perhaps some starting suggestions... *wink, wink* --
1291:
It would probably be good to go ahead and update as you go through them. Some older links aren't working, and there is no telling how long mania.com will keep the redirects up. --
1139:
Ah well, over here we can always explain our obsession with anime by pretending we are interested in foreign (that is, Japanese) culture. Japanese otakus have no such excuse. ^^ --
973:
Btw, doesn't the article feel a little deserted with only two images? I think it is best practice to have at least one screenshot to demonstrate the visual style of a series...
460:
If these issues are not adequately addressed, particularly the referencing and non-free image issues, this article will be taken to Featured Article Review for delisting. --
2064:
It was reviewed for FA back in 2007, and the FA requirements have risen a lot since then. If you want to nominate it for for a new review, now is as good a time as any... --
652:
as bulleted list when we passed the article for GA but during the peer review, we were told to convert it to prose... The merging part is not that difficult, I think, e.g.
1864:
UPDATE: The shows are pretty old, so I can't find any official sites listing the cast in English. However, I did find something on the Japanese sites. Are these any good:
138: 2116: 290: 280: 929:
Erica Friedman's reviews can be considered reliable IMO, especially when the topic is yuri, since she is a published author in the anime field (and the president of
2121: 1993: 1989: 1975: 1824:
list of actors. I could look for it, but the more important issue here is IMO that the ANN references are used to show that the same actor played a role in both
1576:
If that's the case, we also need other information except the dates and the tracklistings for that article. Like the composition history and critical opinion. --
430:
In that case, I'd suggest leaving action, mystery, and war drama (it's supposed to be one genre, hence no comma, but there is not such entry on the Pedia...). --
948:
I do not see why IMDb cannot be considered reliable in the question of the series age rating. I can name several other sources that support the same statement (
1274:
I have checked all the AoD.com links in the article and all seem to be redirecting to the corresponding articles on Mania. Should I update the refs, then? --
119: 2101: 1539: 256: 524:
I gave a general list, which are pretty obvious to spot. If you honestly can't see them, though, I will go through and mark all questionable ones with
2111: 1590: 445:
I've tagged this article for having multiple issues. Many of the "references" are not references at all, but unsourced notes, while others are not
1417:
Pretty much. If this page is missing any of the release dates, they should be added, but from what I saw all the soundtracks are already here. --
1450: 963: 2106: 1542:: "A list of songs in the order they appear and a list of performers in alphabetical order (or any other basic order) is not copyrightable." 243: 204: 81: 1951: 591:
Actually, I don't think merging would be good, but I do understand your delima there. Trying to deal with it is an issue we're facing on
1044:
I removed everything that referenced episodes in the Themes section. It got rather slim but I have an idea how to expand it a bit again.
987:
It was a consensus for the project on the AoD link. Redlinks are only frowned on if they are unlikely to have an article. AoD meets all
1684: 1647: 1606: 1430: 1398: 1369: 1304: 1261: 1130: 1080: 1013: 889: 790: 707: 615: 552: 473: 41: 1971:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1722: 1047:
About the images: shouldn't we remove the OST cover, too? After all, we are not discussing the cover itself in the article... =) --
1695: 31: 1346:
Well, I've rewritten the story section and captions for the two screenshots, so the warning box can be removed now... right? --
1764:
Bee Train series such as Noir and El Cazador." Removing paragraphs, images, and screwing up refs just counts as vandalism. --
1511:
FYI, according to the very article we are discussing merging the two OSTs were released in the US by the now defunct Geneon.
949: 2036: 1699: 1531: 1527: 179: 1117:
even a section for them). Also kind of sad that some of our articles on their manga/anime series kick their butt :P --
255:, and related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 528: 1778: 1616: 1444: 1163:; while the first three really didn't add much to the article (I found them more decorative than informative). So, 44:. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check 939:
I've took the liberty of removing "verify" tag from the Staff Talk reference. For verification, see these scans:
1992:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1961: 341: 936:
Why is AnimeOnDVD wikilinked although there is no article for it? I thought red links are frowned upon in FAs.
1167:, if you saved the images (and can come up with some good captions), I think you can bring the images back.-- 2027: 1943: 657: 449:, including wikis, fansites, and other self-published sources. The article is not in proper compliance with 1678: 1641: 1600: 1424: 1392: 1363: 1298: 1255: 1124: 1074: 1007: 883: 784: 701: 609: 546: 467: 374: 235: 1952:
https://www.webcitation.org/6EFK0Rjut?url=http://www.jvcmusic.co.jp/-/Discography/A018153/VICL-35646.html
694:
delisting :P I think, if nothing else, a list is fine, its just prose seems to becoming more popular. --
2011:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1999: 1586: 1440: 1029:
I removed the rating information altogether because, qoute, age ratings are irrelevant, unquote, anyway.
956:) but none that wouldn't require posting links to each DVD volume instead of just summarizing the whole. 329: 185: 1942:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 943: 940: 2079: 2053: 486:
Unless you list all the references that you consider unreliable here, you are not being constructive.
1234: 167: 1891: 1852: 1813: 1786: 1734: 1708: 1661: 1624: 1567: 1547: 1516: 1489: 959:
The Otaku.com link in Artbook section looks quite alive to me. Must have been a temporary downtime.
1955: 1205: 1172: 1160: 419: 396: 347: 1996:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2078:
Part of FAR rules is that you have to raise concerns about it before nominating it for review.
2012: 1408:
If you put it this way, there is actually no point in keeping the albums list at all, right? --
2069: 1672: 1635: 1594: 1418: 1386: 1357: 1292: 1249: 1118: 1068: 1038: 1001: 997: 877: 778: 695: 603: 540: 461: 454: 496:
I'll remove the See also section. It's a legacy from the time when there was no template yet.
1726: 1718: 1439:
Well, it's not like I have anything against that but we better ask the primary contributor (
926:
First off: I'm still working on rewriting the lead. And merging plot and characters section.
599: 535: 450: 386: 366: 343: 312: 2019: 1481:
available on the "Inside Your Heart" single (i.e. there is no version of it on either OST).
1801: 370: 1865: 1978:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1887: 1871: 1848: 1809: 1782: 1730: 1704: 1657: 1620: 1563: 1543: 1512: 1485: 2018:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2095: 1901: 1201: 1168: 988: 593: 415: 391: 1237:
again: is it still reasonable to have it, now that... whatever happened to it? ^^ --
2065: 1909: 1905: 1877: 1833: 1765: 1577: 1535: 1501: 1454: 1409: 1347: 1326: 1275: 1238: 1224: 1183: 1164: 1140: 1108: 1048: 993: 978: 832: 741: 665: 571: 512: 446: 431: 970:
that in this case, citing episodes is tolerable (and I've reduced them even more).
640:
Uh, you know, I've gone through the dates in the article and discovered that they
410:
has nothing in common with the heroic bloodshed films. Those films are basically
1985: 953: 362: 1984:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1472:
The OST's contain only the TV versions of the opening and ending credit songs.
653: 385:. This should be reduced to the three most relevant genres in accordance with 382: 229: 225: 219: 198: 1962:
https://www.webcitation.org/5w4ALtY4Z?url=http://www.hobbyjapan.co.jp/madlax/
1475:
The song "I'm here" -- used in several important scenes in the series -- is
17: 378: 992:
If other sources make the same statement, use other sources which meet
930: 511:
I hope that constitutes being "adequately addressed" for the moment. --
1965: 1935: 1026:
You'd have to excuse me, but I prefer bulleted lists, after all. %)
922:
Well, I did what I could on my own so here is a couple of thoughts:
656:
doesn't draw any clear line between plot and characters sections.
411: 345: 252: 248: 361:
While updating the infobox, I noticed that there are six genres:
1956:
http://www.jvcmusic.co.jp/-/Discography/A018153/VICL-35646.html
1861:
OK, point taken. Is end of episode credits reliable enough? :3
348: 306: 161: 1796:
References: ANN encyclopedia not considered a reliable source
2084: 2073: 2058: 2041: 1912: 1895: 1880: 1856: 1836: 1817: 1790: 1768: 1738: 1712: 1688: 1665: 1651: 1628: 1610: 1580: 1571: 1551: 1520: 1504: 1493: 1457: 1434: 1412: 1402: 1373: 1350: 1329: 1308: 1278: 1265: 1241: 1227: 1209: 1186: 1176: 1143: 1134: 1111: 1084: 1051: 1017: 981: 893: 835: 794: 744: 711: 668: 619: 574: 556: 515: 477: 434: 423: 400: 2127:
Anime and manga articles with incomplete B-Class checklists
1946:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
966:
be more reliable? %) Even so, it's not as stable, I guess.
414:
films set in modern times, with guns in place of swords.--
1939: 131: 112: 93: 74: 247:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1988:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1233:I would like to raise the question of wikilinking 602:MoS adjustments then have you tweak as needed? -- 1703:the music is such an intergral part of the show. 1615:Then shouldn't this discussion be happening on 962:About the reference for the resin model: would 1974:This message was posted before February 2018. 1717:FYI, I did get some useful responses from the 8: 1908:, but it doesn't list the voice actors... -- 660:, on the other hand, uses a list, go figure. 1540:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_2 977:Well, that's it from me for the moment. -- 193: 53: 26: 1934:I have just modified 2 external links on 1779:Madlax Complete Collection (2009 Edition) 492:I'll rewrite the lead in the near future. 2117:Low-importance anime and manga articles 501:Removing the images is also no problem. 195: 165: 2122:All WikiProject Anime and manga pages 265:Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga 7: 268:Template:WikiProject Anime and manga 241:This article is within the scope of 1966:http://www.hobbyjapan.co.jp/madlax/ 1698:article is listed as a starter for 184:It is of interest to the following 2102:Knowledge former featured articles 25: 1938:. Please take a moment to review 648:Actually, the characters section 2112:C-Class anime and manga articles 1696:.hack//Sign Original Soundtracks 1453:)) for their opinion first... -- 311: 228: 218: 197: 166: 30: 285:This article has been rated as 2042:14:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC) 1330:14:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 1325:Alright, that should be it. -- 1309:13:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 1279:08:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 1266:00:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 1242:21:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 1913:14:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 1896:00:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 1881:17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 1857:23:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 1837:09:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 1818:00:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 259:and see a list of open tasks. 2107:Old requests for peer review 1700:Knowledge:WikiProject Albums 1528:Knowledge:WikiProject Albums 1374:13:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1351:10:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 2085:18:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2074:11:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2059:02:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 1791:17:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC) 1558:I'm changing my opinion to 244:WikiProject Anime and manga 2143: 2005:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1931:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1769:12:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 1617:Talk:List_of_Madlax_albums 291:project's importance scale 120:Featured article candidate 1739:04:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 1713:23:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1689:16:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1666:16:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1652:16:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1629:16:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1611:14:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1581:14:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1572:10:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1552:10:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1521:05:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 1505:21:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 1494:18:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 1458:21:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 1435:18:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 1413:14:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 1403:02:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 1228:10:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 795:18:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 745:18:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 712:17:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 669:10:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 620:00:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 575:21:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 557:18:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 516:14:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 483:OK, let's go in order... 478:02:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 284: 213: 192: 148: 56: 52: 48:) and why it was removed. 1210:23:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 1187:17:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1177:16:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1144:17:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1135:15:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1112:15:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1085:14:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1052:10:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1018:18:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 982:15:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 894:16:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 836:15:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 777:I'll add a UC tag :) -- 435:05:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 424:01:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 401:00:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 271:anime and manga articles 1927:External links modified 1806:online reliable sources 1725:that support using the 1587:the Discography project 658:Serial Experiments Lain 151:Former featured article 139:Featured article review 42:former featured article 375:Psychological thriller 236:Anime and manga portal 174:This article is rated 46:the nomination archive 1530:gives guidelines for 1986:regular verification 101:Good article nominee 1976:After February 2018 2030:InternetArchiveBot 1981:InternetArchiveBot 529:verify credibility 180:content assessment 57:Article milestones 2006: 1619:instead of here? 1039:consensus reality 354: 353: 335: 334: 305: 304: 301: 300: 297: 296: 160: 159: 156: 155: 75:December 16, 2006 16:(Redirected from 2134: 2082: 2056: 2047:Raising concerns 2040: 2031: 2004: 2003: 1982: 1900:Madlax aired on 1675: 1638: 1597: 1591:style guidelines 1441:OgasawaraSachiko 1421: 1389: 1360: 1295: 1252: 1121: 1071: 1004: 880: 781: 698: 606: 543: 533: 527: 464: 447:reliable sources 367:Heroic bloodshed 349: 326: 325: 315: 307: 273: 272: 269: 266: 263: 238: 233: 232: 222: 215: 214: 209: 201: 194: 177: 171: 170: 162: 149:Current status: 134: 132:October 26, 2019 115: 96: 94:January 31, 2007 77: 54: 34: 27: 21: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2092: 2091: 2080: 2054: 2049: 2034: 2029: 1997: 1990:have permission 1980: 1944:this simple FaQ 1929: 1798: 1776: 1761: 1673: 1636: 1595: 1419: 1387: 1382: 1358: 1344: 1293: 1250: 1119: 1069: 1002: 920: 878: 779: 696: 604: 541: 531: 525: 462: 443: 359: 350: 344: 320: 270: 267: 264: 262:Anime and manga 261: 260: 234: 227: 207: 205:Anime and manga 178:on Knowledge's 175: 130: 111: 92: 73: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2140: 2138: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2094: 2093: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2048: 2045: 2024: 2023: 2016: 1969: 1968: 1960:Added archive 1958: 1950:Added archive 1928: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1862: 1844:own guidelines 1797: 1794: 1775: 1772: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1583: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1532:track listings 1525: 1524: 1523: 1483: 1482: 1473: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1269: 1268: 1235:AnimeOnDVD.com 1231: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1197: 1190: 1189: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1045: 1042: 1034: 1030: 1021: 1020: 975: 974: 971: 967: 960: 957: 946: 937: 934: 927: 919: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 876:No prob :) -- 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 661: 646: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 562: 561: 560: 559: 519: 518: 509: 508: 507: 503: 498: 493: 490: 487: 442: 439: 438: 437: 427: 426: 358: 355: 352: 351: 346: 342: 340: 337: 336: 333: 332: 322: 321: 316: 310: 303: 302: 299: 298: 295: 294: 287:Low-importance 283: 277: 276: 274: 257:the discussion 240: 239: 223: 211: 210: 208:Low‑importance 202: 190: 189: 183: 172: 158: 157: 154: 153: 146: 145: 142: 135: 127: 126: 123: 116: 108: 107: 104: 97: 89: 88: 85: 78: 70: 69: 66: 63: 59: 58: 50: 49: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2139: 2128: 2125: 2123: 2120: 2118: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2097: 2086: 2083: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2057: 2046: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2033: 2032: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2001: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1977: 1972: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1932: 1926: 1914: 1911: 1907: 1904:, here's the 1903: 1902:Anime Network 1899: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1869: 1868: 1863: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1795: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1773: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1758: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1697: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1480: 1479: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1459: 1456: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1341: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1296: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1253: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1220: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1200:"deserted".-- 1198: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1145: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1122: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1035: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1005: 999: 995: 990: 986: 985: 984: 983: 980: 972: 968: 965: 961: 958: 955: 951: 947: 944: 941: 938: 935: 932: 928: 925: 924: 923: 917: 895: 891: 888: 885: 881: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 837: 834: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 796: 792: 789: 786: 782: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 746: 743: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 713: 709: 706: 703: 699: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 670: 667: 662: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 621: 617: 614: 611: 607: 601: 596: 595: 594:Tokyo Mew Mew 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 576: 573: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 558: 554: 551: 548: 544: 537: 530: 523: 522: 521: 520: 517: 514: 510: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 491: 488: 485: 484: 482: 481: 480: 479: 475: 472: 469: 465: 458: 456: 452: 448: 440: 436: 433: 429: 428: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 393: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 356: 339: 338: 331: 328: 327: 324: 323: 319: 314: 309: 308: 292: 288: 282: 279: 278: 275: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245: 237: 231: 226: 224: 221: 217: 216: 212: 206: 203: 200: 196: 191: 187: 181: 173: 169: 164: 163: 152: 147: 143: 141: 140: 136: 133: 129: 128: 124: 122: 121: 117: 114: 110: 109: 105: 103: 102: 98: 95: 91: 90: 86: 84: 83: 79: 76: 72: 71: 67: 64: 61: 60: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 2050: 2028: 2025: 2000:source check 1979: 1973: 1970: 1933: 1930: 1872: 1866: 1843: 1829: 1825: 1799: 1777: 1762: 1759:Yuri content 1681: 1674:AnmaFinotera 1644: 1637:AnmaFinotera 1603: 1596:AnmaFinotera 1589:. Per their 1559: 1484: 1477: 1476: 1466: 1447: 1427: 1420:AnmaFinotera 1395: 1388:AnmaFinotera 1383: 1366: 1359:AnmaFinotera 1356:Done. :) -- 1345: 1301: 1294:AnmaFinotera 1258: 1251:AnmaFinotera 1232: 1221: 1219:whatsoever. 1217: 1158: 1127: 1120:AnmaFinotera 1103: 1077: 1070:AnmaFinotera 1010: 1003:AnmaFinotera 976: 921: 918:Second stage 886: 879:AnmaFinotera 787: 780:AnmaFinotera 704: 697:AnmaFinotera 649: 641: 612: 605:AnmaFinotera 592: 549: 542:AnmaFinotera 500: 495: 470: 463:AnmaFinotera 459: 444: 407: 390: 360: 317: 286: 242: 186:WikiProjects 150: 137: 118: 113:June 1, 2007 100: 99: 80: 37: 1804:'s list of 1534:. To quote 1342:Third stage 1161:WP:CAPTIONS 1037:Talk about 933:, to boot). 441:Pending FAR 82:Peer review 18:Talk:MADLAX 2096:Categories 2081:GamerPro64 2055:GamerPro64 2037:Report bug 998:WP:NONFREE 654:Excel Saga 455:WP:NONFREE 2020:this tool 2013:this tool 1888:BloodDoll 1849:BloodDoll 1810:BloodDoll 1783:KrebMarkt 1774:Review(s) 1731:Argel1200 1727:WP:Albums 1719:WP:Albums 1705:Argel1200 1658:Argel1200 1621:Argel1200 1564:Argel1200 1544:Argel1200 1513:Argel1200 1486:Argel1200 600:WP:MOS-AM 536:WP:MOS-AM 451:WP:MOS-AM 387:WP:MOS-AM 330:Archive 1 2026:Cheers.— 1802:WP:ANIME 1721:project 1685:contribs 1671:etc. -- 1648:contribs 1607:contribs 1451:contribs 1431:contribs 1399:contribs 1370:contribs 1305:contribs 1262:contribs 1202:Nohansen 1169:Nohansen 1131:contribs 1081:contribs 1014:contribs 890:contribs 791:contribs 708:contribs 616:contribs 553:contribs 506:section. 474:contribs 416:Nohansen 318:Archives 125:Promoted 87:Reviewed 2066:Koveras 1940:my edit 1910:Koveras 1878:Koveras 1834:Koveras 1766:Koveras 1578:Koveras 1536:TUF-KAT 1502:Koveras 1455:Koveras 1410:Koveras 1348:Koveras 1327:Koveras 1276:Koveras 1239:Koveras 1225:Koveras 1184:Koveras 1165:Koveras 1141:Koveras 1109:Koveras 1049:Koveras 1033:search? 979:Koveras 931:Yuricon 833:Koveras 742:Koveras 666:Koveras 645:code... 572:Koveras 513:Koveras 432:Koveras 371:Mystery 289:on the 176:C-class 144:Demoted 65:Process 1936:Madlax 1867:Madlax 1826:Madlax 1560:Oppose 1196:image. 989:WP:WEB 408:Madlax 381:, and 363:Action 357:Genres 182:scale. 106:Listed 68:Result 38:Madlax 1729:MOS. 1380:Merge 994:WP:RS 412:wuxia 392:Farix 383:Drama 253:manga 249:anime 40:is a 2070:talk 1906:page 1892:talk 1876:? -- 1873:Noir 1853:talk 1830:Noir 1828:and 1814:talk 1800:Per 1787:talk 1735:talk 1723:here 1709:talk 1679:talk 1662:talk 1642:talk 1625:talk 1601:talk 1568:talk 1548:talk 1517:talk 1490:talk 1478:only 1445:talk 1425:talk 1393:talk 1364:talk 1299:talk 1256:talk 1206:talk 1173:talk 1125:talk 1104:some 1075:talk 1008:talk 964:eBay 942:and 884:talk 785:talk 702:talk 610:talk 547:talk 468:talk 420:talk 397:Talk 389:. -- 62:Date 1994:RfC 1964:to 1954:to 1538:in 1041:... 954:IGN 950:ANN 650:was 642:are 379:War 281:Low 2098:: 2072:) 2007:. 2002:}} 1998:{{ 1894:) 1870:, 1855:) 1816:) 1789:) 1781:-- 1737:) 1711:) 1687:) 1664:) 1650:) 1627:) 1609:) 1570:) 1550:) 1519:) 1500:-- 1492:) 1433:) 1401:) 1372:) 1307:) 1264:) 1223:-- 1208:) 1175:) 1133:) 1107:-- 1083:) 1016:) 952:, 892:) 793:) 710:) 664:-- 618:) 555:) 532:}} 526:{{ 476:) 422:) 399:) 377:, 373:, 369:, 365:, 251:, 2068:( 2039:) 2035:( 2022:. 2015:. 1890:( 1851:( 1812:( 1785:( 1733:( 1707:( 1682:· 1677:( 1660:( 1645:· 1640:( 1623:( 1604:· 1599:( 1566:( 1546:( 1515:( 1488:( 1448:· 1443:( 1428:· 1423:( 1396:· 1391:( 1367:· 1362:( 1302:· 1297:( 1259:· 1254:( 1204:( 1171:( 1128:· 1123:( 1078:· 1073:( 1011:· 1006:( 945:. 887:· 882:( 788:· 783:( 705:· 700:( 613:· 608:( 550:· 545:( 471:· 466:( 418:( 395:( 293:. 188:: 20:)

Index

Talk:MADLAX
Former featured article
former featured article
the nomination archive
December 16, 2006
Peer review
January 31, 2007
Good article nominee
June 1, 2007
Featured article candidate
October 26, 2019
Featured article review

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Anime and manga
WikiProject icon
icon
Anime and manga portal
WikiProject Anime and manga
anime
manga
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale

Archive 1
Action
Heroic bloodshed

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.