1102:
MOS and guidelines as a club instead of discussing major changes. Mayumi simply asked
SeizureDog to work with us, not take a militant "we must beat you down" stance. If you take a moment and simply review the history of the page, you will see that his initial edit had an antagonistic agenda, he stated he wanted to "kill" the lists. If you read the archives, we are not unwilling to compromise, but he does not seem to be based on his desire to "kill" and the dismissive tone he's taken on the talk page. Working with someone is so much better than working against them.
1082:
objective? Who is asking for discussion before making major edits? Who isn't freaking out and making personal attacks (questioning my "common sense") rather than trying to build consensus? A revert is NOT showing "knowledge", any troll or vandal can do that. Ned's next summary "kicked it up a notch" as Emeril would say: "removing Figure 17, leaving the painfully shitty and stupid minor list. You want to put Figure 17 back in, cite a source". A victory for objectivity indeed.
31:
836:.) It's a very ugly looking format, not nearly as nice as the manga lists discussed here recently, so there's obviously lots of things we can improve. The basic idea was to get the title, date, and ISBNs with a summary for each book, but also deal with light novels that are essentially one book split over multiple volumes for marketing reasons.
1935:
I agree with
Doceirias. Also, even if a lot of the articles get nominated for deletion and subsequently get voted for deletion at least they've gone through the process. IMHO that's much better then a single editor coming here and making tons of wholesale changes with out any discussion and with an
1793:
and such in his arguments. Simply bring up the fact that his methods and choices in enforcing said guidelines is making
Knowledge suck, so therefore what he is doing is wrong and the argument should be settled as such. It's clearly obvious that the consensus is on this side of the argument. That's
812:
we include about it. Likewise, the use of the phrase "notability is not inherited" has been used outside of it's original meaning, to become something like "Just because we include the parent topic doesn't mean we'll talk about everything in depth". At the same time, it doesn't mean we don't do these
1543:
be used for any non-free images. It's better to use the template than type up a simple list in the summary so you won't have the BOT keep on coming back. I've had that issue with several images where the Fair Use
Rationale was clearly stated however not using the template and was tagged. After being
1101:
I don't expect a "free pass". I do expect that when people come to an article they treat other people with respect rather than walking in with a "we're here to suppress your "resistance"" chip on their shoulder. This is a collaborative effort, not a battleground, and too often people tend to use the
1091:
I was referring to your assertion that the original poster was canvassing, which I disagree with. I agree that you've done a better job keeping your language appropriate, but you have also been so focused on his language that you have failed to address any of the points he made in between insults. I
971:
revert, so don't even try to bullshit me there (especially when I was removing unsourced content). You want to reply with childish insults, unreliable sources, and stupid games, go ahead. I went there to help find a middle ground, but no, you just wrote me off an some generic "enemy" as you often do
903:
It sounds like something that simply needs some arbitrary choosing to make the lists limited, if they are to exist. Quite literally, I'm thinking of proposing taking a set number of examples, and selecting them at random from the existing list. It might sound weird, but if it at least helps wean the
2247:
There are only around 2 admins active at any one time on the entire Farsi
Knowledge. So it would seem that I dont have much say in this matter if an Admin says something, I gather? Their laws seem to be a translation of English wikipedia rules. Do we have a problem here with linking to trailers, as
991:
How many times did you revert? How was your reasons any better than mine? Doesn't the fact that you are just trying to prove a point, disrupting what should have been a calm and normal discussion, play into this? You have the nerve to attempt to blatantly lie to everyone here by trying to appear as
1882:
I agree in principle, but I think the issue here is that TTN is doing more than just merging stubs and articles consisting only of a plot summary; he's also merging articles that are fairly or very fleshed out, and articles that have Good
Article or Featured Article status. At least, that's what I
1139:
and as such I don't feel that it would be appropriate for me to categorize the page under the scope of WP:ANIME (by adding the tag to the talk page). Anyway, I started the article and wrote a bit about his work, but much of the information regarding
Yasushi Ishii can only be found on non-English
1544:
replaced by the template, I had no problems. Key thing is that you have to have a Fair Use
Rationale no matter what or else BOT and/or user will go ahead and tag it for speedy delete. I try to add Fair Use wherever I see images tagged but it should always be the owner's responsibility to do so.
1471:
Fanart is not legal, but rather tolerated and/or ignored. We can not use fanart as a free replacement for fair use images as the same copyright issues exist (compounded with the additional artist who drew the fan art aloso having some minor claim to copyright on the image). For fictional works,
1026:
And seriously, please try to tell me how someone who makes edit summaries like "removing Figure 17, leaving the painfully shitty and stupid minor list. You want to put Figure 17 back in, cite a source" can straight out state that I'm being disruptive when I ask nicely for you to calm down, stop
1918:
Yes, the "merges" are simply bold redirects where no material is being moved from the pages being redirected. It is rather disruptive and completely improper. His actions may not be "against policy" but they certainly deviate from the spirit of
Knowledge and its collaborative, consensus driven
1310:
I would be against using fanart for the same reason I was against using pictures of cosplayers - it isn't the work we're attempting to illustrate. If there is a legitimate fair use rationale, that bot doesn't tag images. Personally, I don't think an internet meme is a subject notable enough to
1081:
Objective? My edit summary: "wait for discussion and consensus before making such bold edits, please." Ned's response: "the minor list is extremely excessive. Use common sense. and no, Figure 17 is not Yuri". Do you see the difference? I ask nicely, he questions my common sense. Who is being
1647:
There doesn't seem to be an issue here. It's something that shouldn't be it's own article, so it makes sense to just merge it somewhere. People remove prods all the time, but nothing here has been deleted, just reorganized. If there's a better place to put the information, put it there. --
1446:
It cant be replaced unless the artist releases a copy of the character into the public domain. Fanart is violating the original authors copyright. If you're gonna use a fair-use image, use an authentic one. Recreating copyrighted material doesn't bypass the copyright laws. --Malevious
772:
has resulted in an interesting closure. The closing administrator basically stated that the point about notability not being inherited is mainly intended for articles about people and applying it to broader topics is tenuous, particularly when applied to articles that are part of an
2274:
As
Doceirias indicated, simply linking to the official site for the series is good enough. If the trailer is not on an official site, then we generally don't link to it, and if it is on the official site, we link to the official site in general rather than directly to the trailer.
807:
A lot of this comes from our odd use of the word "notability". We basically end up defining sub-article notability by the amount of real world information, but that's not what the word actually means, nor dose it necessarily mean if we include a topic at all or not, but rather
1500:
images. Then I can take my time and see which are worth actually saving, without having to worry about a real deadline. I also would like to propose that we start categorizing our images more based on what series they come from, so that working on them is easier. Thanks to
2144:
I've been thinking about this, especially since some of the fields in the featured manga lists don't apply to some of the manga articles I've been editing -- especially the volume title, and for some manga, the tankobon chapters don't have titles, and in one case
491:
Well, the 1990's is pre-Wiki which means many series within that period and beforehand have been omitted, largely that they're "unknown". Where as, new series coming in now and thereafter -- they nearly instantly get their own articles due to recency. Hmm, will
210:. The "sort" of "by series" makes it more organized. Then, the general "anime and manga" category can contain "Anime and manga characters by series" and other such categories as sub-categories. MORE EDIT: Well, here's the main ethnicity category:
1989:
Seriously, don't. I like breathing. Anyways, I wanted to show the Project my Userbox. IF I was supposed to put it on the community userbox thing, please TELL ME, and don't kill me for making a mistake. Tell me what you, as the WikiProject, think.
1730:
I've discovered that a certain user is unilaterally merging hundreds of articles into "list of" articles without discussion. I'd suggest everyone check their watch lists and act accordingly. These undiscussed redirects are really out of control.
436:
and it's subcategories going by year. And there will always be more anime coming in, and I bet within another year, the 'Anime of the 2000s' category will have well over 1000 articles which is a little hard to navigate if you ask me. So, anyone
231:
Is there a guideline on what dates to use for Japanese original run and release dates for anime and manga articles? Do we list what date it was in Japan when an anime is broadcast or a manga is released in Japan? Or do we use the date at
2086:? People tend to post suggestions/requests for comments on the talk page there for userboxes, although the response time tends to be slow. Or if as Nihonjoe said, have the template on your own userspace vs. on Knowledge space, e.g.
1069:
Or, you know, more objective opinions. Which, in theory, will avoid the extremely childish squabble the two of you have been having. This is what Wikiprojects are for - providing a resource that is both objective and knowledgeable.
1224:, as the pages regarding the franchise seem (at best) disjointed and messy. I don't even remember how I ended up making this article, but I guess that's the just an everyday duty of a wikipedian. :-P Anyway, thanks again. --
957:
3rr so far, Ned, wanna go for four? And yes, I am totally aware of how LAME this is, I'm willing to stop just as soon as you wait for discussion rather than forcing your opinion on those who've watched that page for years.
1389:
Fanart itself has copyright/trademark issues of it's own. Under the non-free use criteria, any fanart would be interpreted as a non-free use image and a potential copyvio. At one time, we had a fanart representation of
981:
Your revert war shows precisely how much you're willing to give. I asked you to HOLD ON until consensus was found, but you were unhappy with that and decided to troll via edit summaries. Nicely done Ned. Nicely done.
1595:, this article had been prodded before and I actually wondered where to merged it to. I left a message on his talk page but had no reply as of yet. So I decide to the things myself-- but out of the following choice:
1844:
I hate to buck the trend here, but IMHO better they be merged into lists than inevitably put up at AfD. 90% of all anime characters with individual articles don't have the real-world importance and coverage to meet
2195:
I think it depends on where the trailer is hosted. On the official site? The official site link should take care of that. On YouTube? Are we sure the copyright holders posted it? Otherwise, we can't link to it.
2180:, and has deleted every link I put from every anime article to any trailer of that movie/series. He claims "links to trailers are not encyclopedic and are not relevant". Am I missing something here? Thank You.--
1258:
1059:
Yes, cause rather than trying to discuss this with the involved editors who have been working on the page, it is better to go gather your bully boys and squash any resistance. Top form. Knowledge Prevails!
765:
1515:
I tried to do with Case Closed after clarification-- but not much can be done. But then screencaps for this anime seems to be easy to come by. What I am thinking is a fair use rationale template for anime
2300:. Many series have a manga and an anime adaptation. Sometimes both of them get licensed with different companies and the transliteration of some words are different. Which should be used in the article?
391:
I would say that any show listed as running at 25:00, etc., should be listed on the actual day on which it aired. The "25:00" time is just a marketing gimmick that started in the late 1990s in Japan. ···
1958:
1666:, the article on unofficial Microsoft OS mascots from 2ch/2chan has been mentioned as requiring sources from the last AfD. Note that the article has been itself quoted as a source by Wired Magazine. --
1462:
I admit I'm not expert, but from everything I gather, fanart is quite legal, as fair use (certainly as much as fanfiction). But it's also against the rules on WP for being derivative, or whatever.
2323:
If the article is about the manga, use that; the same for the anime. If it's about both, use the one which is most common. If neither is more common than the other, mention both in the article. ···
2343:
on WP, often you have to decide on a case by case basis with is the 'better' version to use. If there's two equally valid English names, you have to find a good criteria...or possibly just use
1279:
images; and I have to let many of these pics deleted since in my opinion most of these anime-related pics-- namely character screencaps-- are replacable, if we can get some fans to draw it.
1496:
On a similar note to this topic, editors might want to start saving local copies of images just incase you can't get to them all in time. I've just gone through and did so for most of the
867:
597:, it was discontinued without enough chapters for a tankobon volume on its own? The only other potentially notable feature about it is that one character makes a cameo appearence in the
149:
944:
You're the one defending a painfully excessive list that is even specifically marked as "minor". Common sense is not canvassing, and reverting an editor, yourself, who's only out to
194:
An Asian anime character vs a Japanese anime character. Hmmm. Yes, that's definite overcategorization. EDIT: Is it necessary to categorize characters by ethnicity? There's also:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
1027:
reverting and discuss like the gentleman I'm certain you are. I've been more than reasonable in this, you're the only freaking out, cursing and launching into personal attacks.
2130:
So many manga lists and they all use wikitables of similar style, so to prevent editors from adding images on each volume released and to set a standard, should their be one?
1785:
I'm not a party to the arbcom (however if I had known about it I would have participated.) If anyone here is a party to it might I suggest using the following argument: Per
1849:; and with the recent trends of fictional elements from other universes and media being put up for deletion (in last few weeks I've been seeing articles about elements from
185:
is simply ridiculous, as over 80% of all chars are Japanese. I'd say it's overcategorization. Not sure who in the project is taking care of the animanga cats though?
207:
125:
111:
1008:
is your problem? Do you just like to start fights for no apparent reason or because you believe there to be some cabal out to get your lesbian anime list? --
1092:
don't think you get a free pass as the good one here. You keep calling for a discussion, but you haven't discussed anything except Ned's inappropriate tone.
832:
comes out in English next week, I thought I'd slip some backhanded promotion in by asking what people thought of the light novel list used on that page (and
203:
129:
107:
1372:
Agreed -- it's like replacing a screenshot of a live-action character with a drawing of that character, or with a photo of a fan dressed as the character. —
1283:
1050:...if this is canvassing, then we might as well kill ALL wikiprojects, because 80% of discussions on them revolve around similar pointing toward articles.
47:
17:
2149:) there are no chapter divisions at all -- and for others, there are relevant fields I see no way to include -- such as the date chapters take place in
328:
Some anime say it airs on a certain date, but past the 24 hour clock like 26:00. Should we add one to the date because it's pretty much the next day?
1320:
My problem is about the "replacability," above all things. Wikilawyers can always claim that screencaps can be replaced by GFDL-released fanart.--
1480:
be fair use. The issue here is making sure a good fair use rationale is placed on each image being used for each article in which it is used. ···
2092:
Either one is fine; I tend to put my anime ones on Knowledge space because that precedent already exists, while for others I use my userspace.
1591:-- something I don't particularly argue but others here might. The problem he didn't ask for consensus for such a merge, and if he had read
1708:
1667:
2120:
2105:
2051:
1394:, however that was removed by some administrators using the arrangement that it violated the fair-use criteria, even if it was fanart. --
513:
I would say very much so. I wouldn't doubt we have plenty of articles on anime and manga that wouldn't pass the notability guidelines. --
1974:
1831:
1625:
1529:
1435:
1333:
1299:
727:
into a stub rather than a redirect, but I don't have any sources. Does anyone know more about these "seals" in Japanese culture/myths? -
631:
If it is not notable to the author himself, why would it be notable to Wiki? If anything, some of Wallaby's content can be merged with
1236:
1152:
420:, do you not think it reasonable that we start allocating the anime by year of release rather than the decade they aired in? Like how
859:
271:
1957:
For your reference, ArbCom has accepted this case-- but it would not rule on content policy; it would only rule on TTN's behaviour.
211:
1861:
up for deletion and passing), it's inevitable that anime character articles would probably be next to be considered for deletion.
1699:
195:
181:
855:
199:
1871:
1505:, keeping track of that group of images has been much easier (and not just for NFCC stuff, but for transwiki work as well). --
1454:
177:
173:
1539:
You don't have to be computer savvy to make a screencap of a series so they're abundant or potentially so. Fair Use Templates
2315:
1600:
1580:
1179:
I added some for the Japanese wiki, but there isn't much there, and some of it I couldn't translate well so I left it out.--
2150:
813:
things, and sometimes we do justify the greater topical detail. We likely need better phrases with clearer meaning :P --
851:
629:
The story was stopped after 8 chapters without a conclusion, and the author seems to have no intention of continuing it.
425:
1311:
justify a fair use image, especially when we're trying to find group shots to avoid using an image for each character.
1257:
You may want to have a look at the objections and criteria, and then comment on or address the objections raised here:
1905:
745:
1568:
This has been happened for a while, but I still don't know what to deal with it-- and I don't want to escalate it to
2356:
2329:
2281:
2261:
2238:
2223:
2205:
2189:
2162:
2138:
2076:
2063:
1979:
1949:
1928:
1892:
1876:
1836:
1803:
1776:
1758:
1740:
1716:
1690:
1675:
1652:
1640:
1630:
1553:
1534:
1509:
1486:
1466:
1457:
1440:
1405:
1376:
1355:
1338:
1315:
1304:
1265:
1242:
1209:
1196:
1170:
1158:
1106:
1096:
1086:
1074:
1064:
1054:
1031:
1021:
1012:
986:
976:
962:
952:
939:
926:
917:
908:
897:
880:
840:
817:
800:
788:
731:
700:
679:
656:
639:
627:
Left-to-right. Right-to-left. That's rather trivial. If it were to fail notability, it would be for this reason:
620:
607:
593:
Would a Japanese manga written left-to-right be sufficient notablity for an article devoted to it? Even if, as with
583:
554:
541:
524:
500:
482:
464:
454:
397:
374:
349:
332:
319:
302:
278:
261:
240:
218:
189:
163:
143:
118:
1924:
1772:
1736:
38:
2083:
2008:
1140:
websites. As I can't read any of the forms of written Japanese, I'm at a bit of a dead end. Thanks in advance. --
720:
433:
429:
417:
413:
2173:
Any of the admins care to inform me the Knowledge policy on linking movie articles to (specifically) trailers?
1712:
1671:
675:
that isn't already there. Ned's question is exactly mine -- is that a sufficient impact to keep the article? —
1968:
1825:
1619:
1523:
1502:
1429:
1327:
1293:
313:
You should list the date on which it originally aired in Japan, since that's where it aired originally. ···
1262:
1231:
1147:
2297:
2158:
2153:. I suspect there's no good way to template manga lists that will account for all possible variations. —
2070:
I don't think userboxes are required to be all in one place. I've seen plenty that are in userspace. ···
1920:
1768:
1732:
1103:
1083:
1061:
1028:
1018:
983:
959:
936:
932:
914:
574:
460:
Sounds good. You up to the task of fixing it? :P (actually, a bot could probably be written for it...)
132:
seems to have been created because the original editor didn't realize the other one already existed. --
275:
237:
2303:
2146:
1850:
1789:
any guidline can and should be broken if it's enforcement is a detriment to Knowledge. TTN is using
1704:
1605:
Revert to the status before 5 Novebmer (ie unmerge), then raise a prod to discuss where to merge, or
291:
I don't understand what you are trying to say. What does time zone have to do with release dates? --
2340:
2201:
1888:
1867:
1451:
1017:
Your continued rambling to forgive your own bad behavior by making bad faith assumptions is noted.
580:
569:
We would like some input from the community on this article, you can reference our discussions on
2311:
2116:
2047:
1962:
1945:
1819:
1799:
1613:
1517:
1423:
1401:
1321:
1287:
1206:
872:
784:
652:
think it's trivial or not, it's a matter if it had any (sourceable) impact on the real world. --
617:
520:
478:
371:
298:
257:
159:
139:
724:
1700:
http://www.wired.com/culture/design/multimedia/2007/04/gallery_mascots?slide=10&slideView=3
550:
We also might want to think about doing something with the infobox to automate the process. --
2352:
2257:
2219:
2185:
2132:
2093:
1746:
1497:
1276:
1226:
1188:
1142:
446:
2154:
1858:
1786:
1686:
1576:
1549:
1373:
774:
769:
676:
604:
1902:
1636:
I would do #2 because it's not even a character. There might be a better place to put it.
1282:
However, I wonder if this is the consensus for this project? If yes, I would rather think
1136:
945:
894:
829:
742:
668:
594:
186:
2197:
1937:
1884:
1862:
1846:
1815:
1790:
1649:
1592:
1588:
1569:
1506:
1448:
1352:
1312:
1093:
1071:
1009:
973:
949:
923:
905:
837:
814:
697:
693:
672:
653:
632:
599:
551:
367:
346:
345:
No. Thursday night at 25:00 is still Thursday night, even if it is technically Friday.
2232:
Another thing to note: rules on one wikipedia do not necessarily apply on another. ···
2324:
2307:
2276:
2249:
2233:
2177:
2112:
2071:
2058:
2043:
1941:
1795:
1637:
1481:
1396:
1165:
1132:
795:
779:
728:
614:
570:
536:
515:
473:
392:
366:
25:00 in the night in Japan is 1:00 on the following day in English Knowledge due to
329:
314:
293:
252:
154:
134:
115:
1767:. He's currently got an Arbcom case called against him for doing this sort of shit.
2348:
2253:
2215:
2181:
1463:
1181:
1051:
863:
737:
Look into esoteric Buddhism and the martial arts; I think the term to look for is '
696:, but the format would probably need to change a little so it won't look weird. --
461:
439:
421:
1909:
1682:
1545:
1391:
890:
636:
535:
I would wait until it was closer to 600-800 before breaking it down by year. ···
497:
215:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
749:
2337:
1562:
1001:
577:
1476:
fictional works such as anime and manga, the only images that can be used
2334:
1854:
1764:
1221:
935:
to draw even one further person before edit warring to get your own way?
893:
is showing resistance to removal of its example lists. Input requested.--
833:
563:
967:
I'm not playing games with you. The three revert rule does not apply to
471:
200-400? doesn't seem large enough to require further categorization. --
1220:
Thanks guys. I've been doing a bit of work on some articles related to
1415:
Is character screencaps/ scans fall under non-replacable material, and
996:
as many reverts than I have? I reverted the removal of the minor list
250:? It's hard enough to get exact dates for most manga and some OVAs. --
1663:
716:
247:
233:
2344:
1259:
Knowledge:Featured list removal candidates/List of RahXephon media
738:
2089:{{Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga/Userbox/x userbox here}}
1912:
752:
1936:
obvious lack of consensus. There is a huge difference between
2082:
Did you mean post it with all the other anime/manga userboxes
715:
Several anime shows and Japanese games use "Magic seals" (ex:
25:
2176:
An Admin on the farsi wikipedia has left me a message citing
1901:
Doceirias, you mean that his merges are removing content? --
913:
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call canvassing.
496:
come into play for lesser known series within this decade?
172:
Related to this, you may also want to take a look at this:
128:
is the older cat, the list articles should be moved there.
1205:
He is a famous composer in Japan, but he is not a seiyu.--
1000:, but you have the nerve to count my unrelated removal of
412:
Seeing as how we already have about 800 or so articles in
2033:
1585:
1583:
270:
I was using UTC+0 as an example, it was either that or
114:
be moved there, or is the "Lists" category redundant?--
2214:
The links mostly go to IMDB or the official website.--
1131:
I was wondering if anyone could help with the article
1286:
would be one of the few screencaps to be perserved.--
1253:
List of RahXephon media was listed for de-featuring
1411:OK, just answer me these two important questions:
148:When ahead and sent it to CfD. See the discussion
2111:Moved it to the Anime and Manga userbox page! :)
1351:I don't believe that qualifies as a replacement.
1681:By the way, what is that Wired Magazine source?
1164:I did a little bit. Not much, but a little. ···
103:Lists of anime and manga characters (Category)
1599:Keep the status as of now (content merged to
1275:Beta commandbot is going on crawling for all
212:Category:Anime_and_manga_characters_by_origin
208:Category:Anime and manga characters by series
126:Category:Anime and manga characters by series
112:Category:Anime and manga characters by series
8:
1883:gleaned from glancing over the Arbitration.
1284:Image:Yoake Mae yori Ruri Iro na-cabbage.PNG
922:... no... no it's not... Jesus people... --
204:Category:Lists of anime and manga characters
196:Category:American anime and manga characters
182:Category:Japanese anime and manga characters
130:Category:Lists of anime and manga characters
108:Category:Lists of anime and manga characters
200:Category:African_anime_and_manga_characters
2023:This user is not a half pint or a midget!
794:I think that was a very wise decision. ···
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
1271:Some clarifications on image rules needed
931:Seriously Ned, can you not wait for your
866:. Feel free to comment at the nomination
178:Category:Iraqi anime and manga characters
174:Category:Asian anime and manga characters
904:article off the list, it might help. --
202:. Yet, none for European. Items under
723:) I was thinkign of making the current
227:Japanese original run and release dates
110:is underpopulated. Should the lists in
1816:WP:RFAR#Episode and Character Articles
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1004:, because it was unsourced? What the
7:
1418:If not, can be replacible with what.
972:to people who disagree with you. --
2169:Linking to trailers is discouraged?
1984:
1587:, stating the its content violates
24:
1940:and being completely wreckless.
860:List of Naruto chapters (Part II)
272:Eastern Time Zone (North America)
2015:
1985:Please don't bite my head off...
856:List of Naruto chapters (Part I)
692:If not, it might live nicely on
29:
1579:moved the article's content to
886:Example lists in genre articles
2151:List of Yotsuba&! chapters
1601:List of Case Closed characters
1581:List of Case Closed characters
1:
2357:02:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
2330:01:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
2282:20:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2262:04:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2239:02:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2224:04:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2206:01:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2190:00:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2163:16:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2139:19:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
2121:23:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
2106:07:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
2077:05:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
2064:05:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
2052:04:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
1980:05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
1950:23:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1929:11:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
1893:22:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1877:22:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1837:22:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1804:21:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1777:21:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1759:21:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1741:20:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1717:22:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
1691:09:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
1676:20:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
1653:07:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
1641:00:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
1631:21:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
1554:21:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
1535:21:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
1510:00:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
1487:01:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
1467:22:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1458:21:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1441:21:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1406:21:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1377:20:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1356:20:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1339:20:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1316:19:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1305:19:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1266:10:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1243:22:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1210:19:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1197:06:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1171:04:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1159:04:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1107:06:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1097:05:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1087:04:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1075:03:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1065:03:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1055:02:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1032:04:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1022:03:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1013:02:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
987:02:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
977:02:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
963:01:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
953:01:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
940:01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
927:01:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
918:01:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
909:00:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
898:23:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
881:19:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
841:23:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
667:I'm not sure there's much in
852:List of Naruto manga volumes
818:20:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
801:01:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
789:01:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
732:20:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
701:00:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
680:00:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
657:22:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
640:22:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
621:21:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
608:18:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
584:22:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
555:20:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
542:03:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
525:22:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
501:21:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
483:14:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
465:11:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
455:10:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
426:Category:Video games by year
398:03:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
375:16:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
350:22:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
333:14:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
320:06:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
303:03:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
279:03:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
262:03:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
241:02:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
219:16:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
190:07:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
164:14:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
144:14:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
119:14:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
721:Castlevania: Dawn of sorrow
434:Category:21st century films
418:Category:Anime of the 1990s
414:Category:Anime of the 2000s
2373:
428:and lists every year like
246:Why would we use dates at
2009:User:L337p4wn/Userbox/FMA
948:, is not an edit war. --
846:Featured topic nomination
430:Category:2007 video games
2345:whichever was used first
1612:What would you choose?--
2292:wp:use English question
2248:far as "relevance" and
1135:. I am not a member of
760:Interesting AfD results
416:, and 400+ articles in
1726:Check your watch lists
1503:Category:Digimon media
850:Hello. I've nominated
180:(3 articles) and this
992:if you have not done
648:It's not a matter if
613:What is the manga? --
42:of past discussions.
2349:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫
2147:Please Save My Earth
2134:« ₣ullMetal ₣alcon »
1851:Dungeons and Dragons
1814:For your reference:
1575:Earlier this month,
1464:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫
1127:Help with an article
1052:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫
671:that's pertinant to
603:manga (not anime). —
462:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫
1745:Who is this user?
589:Notability question
206:should be moved to
2347:as a last resort.
2126:No manga template?
2319:
2306:comment added by
2296:A question about
2040:
2039:
2028:
2027:
1719:
1707:comment added by
1498:Cardcaptor Sakura
824:Light novel lists
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2364:
2327:
2301:
2279:
2236:
2103:
2098:
2074:
2061:
2036:
2016:
1996:
1995:
1977:
1971:
1965:
1959:Archived request
1921:Kyaa the Catlord
1875:
1859:Warhammer 40,000
1834:
1828:
1822:
1769:Kyaa the Catlord
1756:
1751:
1733:Kyaa the Catlord
1702:
1628:
1622:
1616:
1577:User:Masaruemoto
1532:
1526:
1520:
1484:
1438:
1432:
1426:
1336:
1330:
1324:
1302:
1296:
1290:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1195:
1192:
1185:
1168:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1104:Kyaa the Catlord
1084:Kyaa the Catlord
1062:Kyaa the Catlord
1029:Kyaa the Catlord
1019:Kyaa the Catlord
984:Kyaa the Catlord
960:Kyaa the Catlord
937:Kyaa the Catlord
915:Kyaa the Catlord
879:
877:
828:Since the first
798:
770:Naruto geography
539:
453:
450:
443:
432:. Same goes for
408:New cat proposal
395:
317:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2372:
2371:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2325:
2294:
2277:
2252:is concerned?--
2234:
2171:
2137:
2128:
2099:
2094:
2090:
2072:
2059:
2032:
2029:
1987:
1975:
1969:
1963:
1865:
1832:
1826:
1820:
1752:
1747:
1728:
1661:
1626:
1620:
1614:
1566:
1530:
1524:
1518:
1482:
1436:
1430:
1424:
1334:
1328:
1322:
1300:
1294:
1288:
1273:
1263:129.241.151.140
1255:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1190:
1183:
1180:
1166:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1129:
888:
873:
871:
848:
830:Missing (novel)
826:
796:
762:
713:
669:Wallaby (manga)
595:Wallaby (manga)
591:
567:
537:
448:
441:
438:
410:
393:
315:
229:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2370:
2368:
2360:
2359:
2332:
2298:wp:use english
2293:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2242:
2241:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2209:
2208:
2170:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2131:
2127:
2124:
2110:
2088:
2080:
2079:
2067:
2066:
2038:
2037:
2030:
2026:
2025:
2020:
2014:
2012:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1993:
1986:
1983:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1896:
1895:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1780:
1779:
1727:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1709:132.205.99.122
1694:
1693:
1668:132.205.99.122
1660:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1644:
1643:
1610:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1593:Talk:APTX 4869
1565:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1409:
1408:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1272:
1269:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1213:
1212:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1174:
1173:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1024:
911:
887:
884:
864:featured topic
847:
844:
825:
822:
821:
820:
804:
803:
775:article series
761:
758:
757:
756:
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
694:Kiyohiko Azuma
685:
684:
683:
682:
673:Kiyohiko Azuma
662:
661:
660:
659:
643:
642:
633:Kiyohiko Azuma
624:
623:
600:Azumanga Daioh
590:
587:
566:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
545:
544:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
506:
505:
504:
503:
486:
485:
468:
467:
409:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
338:
337:
336:
335:
323:
322:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
284:
283:
282:
281:
265:
264:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
169:
168:
167:
166:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2369:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2339:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2299:
2291:
2283:
2280:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2240:
2237:
2231:
2230:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2174:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2125:
2123:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2108:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2097:
2087:
2085:
2078:
2075:
2069:
2068:
2065:
2062:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2035:
2031:
2024:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2010:
2006:
2005:
2001:
1998:
1997:
1994:
1991:
1982:
1981:
1978:
1972:
1966:
1960:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1917:
1916:
1914:
1911:
1907:
1904:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1873:
1869:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1838:
1835:
1829:
1823:
1817:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1750:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1725:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1629:
1623:
1617:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1584:
1582:
1578:
1573:
1571:
1564:
1561:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1527:
1521:
1516:screencaps?--
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1499:
1488:
1485:
1479:
1475:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1455:Contributions
1453:
1450:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1439:
1433:
1427:
1417:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1357:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1340:
1337:
1331:
1325:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1314:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1297:
1291:
1285:
1280:
1278:
1270:
1268:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1252:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1223:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1187:
1186:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1138:
1134:
1133:Yasushi Ishii
1126:
1108:
1105:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1053:
1049:
1033:
1030:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
990:
989:
988:
985:
980:
979:
978:
975:
970:
966:
965:
964:
961:
956:
955:
954:
951:
947:
946:prove a point
943:
942:
941:
938:
934:
930:
929:
928:
925:
921:
920:
919:
916:
912:
910:
907:
902:
901:
900:
899:
896:
892:
885:
883:
882:
878:
876:
875:Sephiroth BCR
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
845:
843:
842:
839:
835:
831:
823:
819:
816:
811:
806:
805:
802:
799:
793:
792:
791:
790:
786:
782:
781:
776:
771:
767:
759:
754:
751:
747:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
730:
726:
722:
718:
710:
702:
699:
695:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
681:
678:
674:
670:
666:
665:
664:
663:
658:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
641:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:
622:
619:
616:
612:
611:
610:
609:
606:
602:
601:
596:
588:
586:
585:
582:
579:
576:
572:
571:its talk page
565:
562:
556:
553:
549:
548:
547:
546:
543:
540:
534:
533:
526:
522:
518:
517:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
502:
499:
495:
490:
489:
488:
487:
484:
480:
476:
475:
470:
469:
466:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
452:
451:
445:
444:
435:
431:
427:
424:does it with
423:
419:
415:
407:
399:
396:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
376:
373:
369:
368:WP:DATE#Times
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
351:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
334:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
318:
312:
311:
304:
300:
296:
295:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
280:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
254:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
235:
226:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
191:
188:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:
165:
161:
157:
156:
151:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
136:
131:
127:
123:
122:
121:
120:
117:
113:
109:
102:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2295:
2175:
2172:
2133:
2129:
2109:
2100:
2095:
2091:
2081:
2041:
2022:
1992:
1988:
1956:
1843:
1794:my 2 cents.
1753:
1748:
1744:
1729:
1662:
1611:
1574:
1567:
1540:
1495:
1477:
1473:
1421:
1410:
1395:
1281:
1274:
1256:
1225:
1189:
1182:
1141:
1130:
1005:
997:
993:
968:
889:
874:
849:
827:
809:
778:
763:
714:
649:
628:
598:
592:
568:
514:
493:
472:
447:
440:
411:
292:
251:
230:
153:
133:
106:
75:
43:
37:
2302:—Preceding
2250:WP:NOT#LINK
2178:WP:NOT#LINK
2155:Quasirandom
1910:22 November
1703:—Preceding
1472:expecially
1452:•Talk Page•
1374:Quasirandom
891:Yuri (term)
870:. Regards,
764:The recent
677:Quasirandom
605:Quasirandom
276:Silver Edge
238:Silver Edge
36:This is an
2057:CHOMP! ···
1938:being bold
1906:(contribs)
895:SeizureDog
750:9 November
746:(contribs)
725:Magic seal
711:Magic Seal
494:notability
187:Ninja neko
176:which has
95:Archive 30
87:Archive 25
82:Archive 24
76:Archive 23
70:Archive 22
65:Archive 21
60:Archive 20
2198:Doceirias
1976:Salvadori
1919:mission.
1885:Doceirias
1863:NeoChaosX
1833:Salvadori
1787:WP:IGNORE
1650:Ned Scott
1627:Salvadori
1563:APTX 4869
1531:Salvadori
1507:Ned Scott
1437:Salvadori
1353:Doceirias
1335:Salvadori
1313:Doceirias
1301:Salvadori
1094:Doceirias
1072:Doceirias
1010:Ned Scott
1002:Figure 17
974:Ned Scott
950:Ned Scott
924:Ned Scott
906:Ned Scott
838:Doceirias
815:Ned Scott
698:Ned Scott
654:Ned Scott
552:Ned Scott
347:Doceirias
2341:anything
2316:contribs
2308:Toothpyx
2304:unsigned
2113:L337p4wn
2044:L337p4wn
1942:Elhector
1855:Warcraft
1796:Elhector
1705:unsigned
1638:Toothpyx
1449:Userpage
1222:Hellsing
1137:WP:ANIME
862:to be a
834:Baccano!
810:how much
729:Ravedave
615:Masamage
564:Megadeus
437:agree?--
330:Toothpyx
116:Nohansen
2254:Zereshk
2216:Zereshk
2182:Zereshk
2002:Result
1970:Curtisi
1847:WP:FICT
1827:Curtisi
1791:WP:FICT
1621:Curtisi
1608:Speedy.
1589:WP:FICT
1570:WP:AN/I
1525:Curtisi
1431:Curtisi
1329:Curtisi
1295:Curtisi
1277:NONFREE
994:exactly
39:archive
2101:Sphere
2096:Broken
1964:Samuel
1915:(GMT)
1908:01:37
1821:Samuel
1754:Sphere
1749:Broken
1683:KyuuA4
1664:OS-tan
1659:OS-tan
1615:Samuel
1546:Fox816
1519:Samuel
1474:visual
1425:Samuel
1392:Midori
1323:Samuel
1289:Samuel
1207:Mujaki
858:, and
748:02:48
717:Naruto
637:KyuuA4
498:KyuuA4
372:Mujaki
216:KyuuA4
184:-: -->
124:Since
2034:Usage
1999:Code
1903:Gwern
1572:yet.
1397:Farix
1228:Shark
1144:Shark
998:twice
780:Farix
755:(GMT)
743:Gwern
741:'. --
739:mudra
516:Farix
474:Farix
422:WP:VG
294:Farix
253:Farix
248:UTC+0
234:UTC+0
155:Farix
135:Farix
16:<
2353:talk
2338:with
2335:Like
2312:talk
2258:talk
2220:talk
2202:talk
2186:talk
2159:talk
2117:talk
2084:here
2048:talk
2019:FMA
1946:talk
1925:talk
1913:2007
1889:talk
1872:walk
1868:talk
1857:and
1800:talk
1773:talk
1737:talk
1713:talk
1687:talk
1672:talk
1550:talk
1541:MUST
1478:must
1402:Talk
1261:. --
1233:face
1149:face
1006:hell
868:here
785:Talk
777:. --
753:2007
521:Talk
479:Talk
299:Talk
274:. --
258:Talk
236:? --
198:and
160:Talk
152:. --
150:here
140:Talk
2326:日本穣
2278:日本穣
2275:···
2235:日本穣
2073:日本穣
2060:日本穣
2011:}}
2007:|{{
1973:di
1967:di
1830:di
1824:di
1818:.--
1765:TTN
1624:di
1618:di
1528:di
1522:di
1483:日本穣
1434:di
1428:di
1332:di
1326:di
1298:di
1292:di
1238:217
1167:日本穣
1154:217
969:any
933:RfC
797:日本穣
768:on
766:AfD
578:Big
575:The
573:. -
538:日本穣
394:日本穣
370:.--
316:日本穣
2355:)
2318:)
2314:•
2260:)
2222:)
2204:)
2188:)
2161:)
2119:)
2050:)
2042:--
1961:--
1948:)
1927:)
1891:)
1870:,
1853:,
1802:)
1775:)
1739:)
1715:)
1689:)
1674:)
1552:)
1422:--
1404:)
854:,
787:)
719:,
650:we
635:.
523:)
481:)
301:)
260:)
214:.
162:)
142:)
91:→
2351:(
2310:(
2256:(
2218:(
2200:(
2184:(
2157:(
2145:(
2115:(
2046:(
1944:(
1923:(
1887:(
1874:)
1866:(
1798:(
1771:(
1735:(
1711:(
1685:(
1670:(
1548:(
1400:(
1191:八
1184:十
783:(
618:♫
581:X
519:(
477:(
449:八
442:十
297:(
256:(
158:(
138:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.