Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Electronics/Assessment - Knowledge

Source 📝

390:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found 32: 63: 91: 81: 239:
While I could see bumping these up to mid or maybe even high. Most people who have even a passing interest in electronics could name a few of the laws(like me). But some are very specific and/or obscure. I was also making sure that all priority levels were filled. If we moved laws and theories up, what will drop to low?
346:. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Knowledge 1.0 Editorial team, 267:
The log section says it cannot be transcluded because of its extreme size. In fact, it is an empty page! Wikiproject electronics is not that big, and the assesment changes over 30 days are minuscule (in this case non-existent) so that is a pretty silly statement to have on the page. Does anyone
467:
is an extended redirect to Power dividers and directional couplers. The goal of writing it as an extended redirect instead of a standard redirect seems to be to provide citations that prove that hybrid couplers really are a form of directional coupler. I suggest a new step on the quality scale be
238:
I would like to agree that Ohm's Law should be of higher priority. But those are set up by familiarity rather than importance. More familiar subjects are more important for an encyclopedia. I was looking for a way to include all of a category into one importance level, such as laws and theories.
179:
Following up on Ohm's Law... how can it be considered to be LOW IMPORTANCE by any standard? Linear electronic devices would be impossible to construct if Ohm's Law weren't obeyed by many components!! The "Importance scale" scheme seems to completely confound the issue of
471:
Option 1: a specific step for this situation. "ERD" is an extended redirect or disambiguation page, which provides references to other pages together with citations proving the relevance of the destination pages.
331:, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with 413:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the 316:. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at 338:
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at
332: 406: 421:
to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at
506: 501: 511: 117: 17: 321: 302: 410: 402: 113: 104: 68: 475:
Option 2: a more general grade. "S" is a satisfactory article which, due to the unusual nature of the article, is naturally short.
149:
How can Ohm's Law be an example of something with a "low importance" rating, but the article itself is graded a "high importance"?
375: 301:
is a collection of English Knowledge articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The
447: 379: 268:
know what bot is responsible for this by the way? There should be a link to it in case it(s owner) needs to be contacted.
422: 227: 43: 112:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the page attached to this page, or visit the
317: 374:
subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering
339: 298: 487: 391: 387: 365: 356: 350: 288: 252: 233: 170: 153: 313: 150: 383: 343: 49: 269: 246: 165: 96: 347: 196:
to the understanding of semiconductors and their technological use... however it is also very
483: 434: 306: 464: 452: 371: 215:
will probably already have some understanding of the concept, while those who look up
495: 442: 433:
to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome
241: 160: 116:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the 320:. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at 220: 328: 479: 430: 189: 109: 211:
means that the latter is a higher priority. For one thing, people who look up
90: 80: 62: 216: 208: 86: 335:, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 108:, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about 212: 204: 463:
I have found an article to which the stub rating does not apply.
25: 294:
Knowledge 0.7 articles have been selected for Electronic
409:. We are also in the process of implementing a 307:automated selection of articles for Version 0.7 8: 329:list of selected articles with cleanup tags 203:I'm not sure that greater familiarity with 57: 42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 362:This is a notice to let you know about 312:We would like to ask you to review the 59: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Electronics 322:Knowledge:Release Version Nominations 7: 303:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team 31: 29: 314:articles selected from this project 48:It is of interest to the following 24: 507:NA-importance electronic articles 502:Project-Class electronic articles 397:If you are already subscribed to 188:For instance, I would argue that 125:Knowledge:WikiProject Electronics 512:WikiProject Electronics articles 128:Template:WikiProject Electronics 89: 79: 61: 30: 219:may have no background at all. 488:15:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 455:} 09:06, 15 March, 2009 (UTC) 351:16:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 423:Knowledge talk:Article alerts 528: 318:Knowledge talk:Version 0.7 192:of semiconductors is very 171:04:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 154:00:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 417:parameter, but forget to 289:16:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 74: 56: 253:17:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 234:16:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 105:WikiProject Electronics 401:, it is now easier to 340:this project's subpage 200:to the general public. 386:and other workflows ( 376:Articles for deletion 344:User:SelectionBot/0.7 102:This page is part of 407:request new features 380:Requests for comment 333:copyediting requests 131:electronic articles 97:Electronics portal 44:content assessment 438: 230: 224: 147: 146: 143: 142: 139: 138: 118:project talk page 519: 429:Message sent by 428: 416: 285: 282: 281: 278: 277: 251: 249: 244: 228: 222: 168: 163: 133: 132: 129: 126: 123: 99: 94: 93: 83: 76: 75: 65: 58: 35: 34: 33: 26: 527: 526: 522: 521: 520: 518: 517: 516: 492: 491: 461: 450: 414: 372:fully-automated 360: 296: 283: 279: 275: 273: 271: 265: 247: 242: 240: 184:versus general 166: 161: 130: 127: 124: 121: 120: 95: 88: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 525: 523: 515: 514: 509: 504: 494: 493: 465:Hybrid coupler 460: 457: 446: 399:Article Alerts 366:Article alerts 359: 357:Article alerts 354: 295: 292: 264: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 201: 174: 173: 151:63.202.158.130 145: 144: 141: 140: 137: 136: 134: 101: 100: 84: 72: 71: 66: 54: 53: 47: 36: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 524: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 499: 497: 490: 489: 485: 481: 476: 473: 469: 466: 458: 456: 454: 449: 444: 439: 436: 432: 426: 424: 420: 412: 411:"news system" 408: 404: 400: 395: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 368: 367: 358: 355: 353: 352: 349: 345: 341: 336: 334: 330: 325: 323: 319: 315: 310: 308: 304: 300: 299:Knowledge 0.7 293: 291: 290: 287: 286: 262: 254: 250: 245: 237: 236: 235: 231: 225: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 178: 177: 176: 175: 172: 169: 164: 158: 157: 156: 155: 152: 135: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 98: 92: 87: 85: 82: 78: 77: 73: 70: 67: 64: 60: 55: 51: 45: 41: 37: 28: 27: 19: 477: 474: 470: 462: 440: 427: 418: 415:display=none 398: 396: 364: 363: 361: 348:SelectionBot 337: 326: 311: 305:has made an 297: 270: 266: 197: 193: 186:familiarity. 185: 181: 148: 114:project page 103: 50:WikiProjects 40:project page 39: 431:User:Addbot 419:give a link 403:report bugs 384:Peer review 263:Log section 190:band theory 122:Electronics 110:electronics 69:Electronics 496:Categories 453:WP Physics 441:Thanks. — 198:unfamiliar 182:importance 468:created. 388:full list 217:Ohm's Law 209:Ohm's Law 194:important 448:κοντριβς 443:Headbomb 205:Switches 159:Fixed. 229:contrib 480:Jc3s5h 223:OXFYRE 213:Switch 46:scale. 459:Stubs 284:Spark 207:than 38:This 16:< 484:talk 435:here 405:and 392:here 370:, a 342:of 324:. 243:Joe 162:Joe 498:: 486:) 478:-- 451:– 425:. 394:. 382:, 378:, 327:A 309:. 280:ng 276:ni 274:in 272:Sp 232:) 482:( 445:{ 437:. 248:I 226:( 221:M 167:I 52::

Index

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Electronics
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Electronics
WikiProject icon
icon
Electronics portal
WikiProject Electronics
electronics
project page
project talk page
63.202.158.130
00:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Joe
I
04:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
band theory
Switches
Ohm's Law
Switch
Ohm's Law
MOXFYRE
contrib
16:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Joe
I
17:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
SpinningSpark
16:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.