680:
anyone else's. On a less irrelevant note, these tables have been discussed at great length on several occasions, and until recently, there was consensus against the tables in any form. Lately there was an agreement to include the tables in a simplified format, which has not been carried out at all until today. There are already two flags for each driver on every page, so deciding not to add a third is hardly "removing information about nationalities", I'm sure you'll agree. The IP editor's other inclusions, such as car numbers, have been discussed and were dismissed out of hand, if I recall, and rightly so. The359, I take your point about messaging the IP editor, but I considered this live discussion a relevant place to direct him. His edit summaries were not particularly friendly, so I did not want to get into a slanging match with him.
843:- there is no deadline for adding them. The reason they are in the Japan/Pacific articles is because they have been fully expanded and are fully in standard with the MoS standards today, and are thus featured articles. LeaveSleaves, results tables are very easily verified, millions of people watched the races, yet standings are not as easily verified, thus should have a reference. On a seperate note, the FAC standards have been heavily tightened within the last six months and the chances are a few articles that are currently FA on the scale would not pass a FAR should one ever get put forward.
429:
others will follow suit. I look forward to the next time Mark83 brings up a point for discussion in a really dispassionate manner. "Brutal" was the word used by the guy proposing the colour change, if you'd bothered to ask. Someone else said it was "horrid" yet no-one had a pop at him. This idea was a stupid idea, and it was proved so by no-one agreeing with it. But I thought it the right thing to do to bring it here. It's typical of this WP that someone still finds a petty beef with it. Next time I'll just leave it for someone else to deal with.
87:
2080:
183:
32:
59:
77:
1584:
races and his personal history, it does seem possible that he changed his nationality between his first and last (second!) races. This is about the only circumstance in which I think it would be right to have two nationalities in the infobox. Can anyone (perhaps someone with access to FORIX!) shed any light on this? Ta.
1748:
The article now states that this was the first SingTel
Singapore Grand Prix, which is throughly misleading. It either needs to state that it was the 9th GP, or just "2008". Just because this is the first time that particular sponsor has been involved, we surely can't allow such a misleading statement
810:
I take your point. I just feel that so many flags look ridiculous. Incidentally, you mention consistency, but even once these tables were decided upon, those who were calling for their inclusion didn't actually add any to the race articles. There are still only three for the whole of the 2008 season.
645:
And if you believe that makes you an honourable person, you may be delighted to know that the very same thing happened to me while trying to correct the errors in my message. Not that I am complaining about that either, but just get off the high horse. An unregistered user's contributions are not any
615:
I disagree, I think this is the best place to have this discussion, since there is already a discussion here. It's a pretty minor edit war, I have only reverted him twice and I have directed him here. I think that's a perfectly rational direction to take. Huawei, sorry you couldn't retrieve your edit
428:
Sorry, I appear to have missed the last part of the discussion here. I am perfectly entitled to say whatever I want about my thoughts on the matter. Everyone else here has a mind of their own, it's utterly ridiculous to suggest that simply because the first comment is coloured a certain way, that all
1948:
But then you fall into the "what is a Grand Prix" argument. Yes the
Singapore GP was the ninth motor race that has been referred to as a Singapore Grand Prix, but are we really suggesting that there is continuity between the different iterations? Of course there isn't. You are trying to be pedanitic
1152:
If you want to add things, why not add some text instead of adding more tables? Knowledge (XXG) should be an encyclopedia not a statistics resource. There are many other websites out there dedicated to being stats resources, we should not be duplicating their effort, or even duplicating our own as a
997:
Hey. Why remove them from the
Japanese but not Singapore? I think it's needed becasue it s close and in the last few races it is wanted to know the standings of the championship. t adds information to the Championship race so it's quite needed. Does it matter about other sights hosting the results?
1687:
The editor was correct to make the change. The official name is the official name, they could call it what they like but if you want a box labled "Official Name" in an infobox then that's what must go in it. I can't see any better reference that states it is the 9th GP, that's pure OR on our part.
1092:
We agreed here several times over to have the post-race tables, but still none of the people who wanted them have actually bothered to add any. If you want them, add them. You can hardly expect people who didn't really want them to go around adding them. The
Singapore race has them, but they don't
1026:
The pre-race stuff was removed from the
Singapore article as well. It's a race article, not an article about the championship. If anyone wants to know the standings they can either look at the dopey post-race tables on the previous race article, or hell, maybe they could look at the season article
1583:
has both
Argentinian and Italian nationalities listed in the driver infobox? The longstanding WPF1 consensus is that the infobox represents the nationality a driver represented in F1, so normally speaking there should be only one, and it may not be the most obvious one. Looking at de Tomaso's two
950:
Pre-race points table should be removed entirely. The standings prior to the race are more than adequately covered by the 2008 Singapore GP article, and by the 2008 season summary article. Both articles are adequately wikilinked from the Japan GP article should anyone want to know what the points
586:
I notice you haven't left a message on either his talk page or the article talk page. It would be best to take it there rather than edit warring, even if you have to leave the article in his format for a little while. An explanation rather than brief edit summaries of "it's consensus" would be
2055:
And of course, a
Knowledge (XXG) GP name would probably contravene WP:OR. Note that although roman numerals are common, some (such as San Marino/Imola) do use figures in their official name, so there's inconsistencies already. One final point is that official websites do not necessarily use the
679:
I never claimed to be an honourable person, and you are not in any position to judge that. If you arrive out of the blue accusing people of baiting other editors, then perhaps it is you riding the high horse, don't you think? Just because you lost an edit - your edits are no more important than
1210:
Tyre is the
European spelling. The majority of Formula One races take place in European, or at least countries which speak English and spell it as Tyre (Britain, Singapore, Australia, South Africa, etc.). There is no reason to change the spelling of the word from British English to American
982:
I know the discussion is basically dead by now, but another reason to avoid pre- and post-points standings is that if done you may as well list all 20 drivers if you list 5 (top 5 aren't always the most important). As that'd clutter up the page immeasurably, its a good idea to just circumvent
1513:
Hrm? I wasn't advocating people go out and do it Pyrope. I was simply saying that while he move to Slick tyre was technically correct, we need to consider whether such moves are acctually helpful. It changed to tire in...04? 05? Long enough that a casual move was probably not of any benefit.
1385:
is
American, the servers are in America. The convention is that spelling will either be in the spelling in which an article was first written, or in the spelling that is most appropriate for the subject, if there is one. Perhaps you should check these things out before getting in a strop.
871:
We still have race results pages with almost no templates, race reports, qualifying, anything on them but a chart of the race results. It takes time for new concepts to filter through to the hundreds of race articles we have, but someone will be bored enough someday to go through them.
1767:
and referring to this year's race as being the first. We can't refer to it as the first - that is simply not true. We can refer to it as the ninth race or if we go for just "2008" then we have to change all the
Formula One race articles to match as otherwise there is no consistency.
388:
Most initial requests for comment tend to be weighted towards the side of the person bringing the discussion up. It's up to the other party to come and provide the defence. From where I see it, the discussion starter has as much right to express their opinion as any responders.
1230:: a pointless waste of time and energy. We could edit back and forth until the sun explodes and nothing substantive would be achieved. Spelling convention for F1 articles was arrived at a long time ago and you have not provided any reason to change it other than you want to. --
759:
I recall that point was brought up during the last discussion we had. I just feel that the race reports are in danger of becoming a flagfest. Why should each driver has his flag shown three times? Isn't it overkill? They add nothing when included with such frequency.
630:
Incidentally, I'd rather you didn't accuse me of "baiting" another editor. By the way, I had an edit conflict on this very page simply because you were adjusting your comment to make it a little more snarky, but you don't see me complaining about it.
646:
less than registered ones, and if an expanded table has a potential for being useful, why not bring it up here for consideration for addition, instead of coming here to gain support for its removal by calling it "irrelevant". Please be reminded that
2056:
official formal name - quite often a more marketing friendly name is used there, as the main aim is for the promoter to flog tickets. Autocourse is probably the best place to get the official title, but that means waiting until the end of the year.
2031:
the 9th Singapore Grand Prix, but I have no objections to leave it as "2008 SingTel Singapore Grand Prix" until all the differences are sorted out and as suggested by DMN, wait till the Autocourse yearbooks and stuff for this season are released. -
951:
are. Triplication is really unneccesary, and it is further filling an article with tabluar stats. Knowledge (XXG) should not be a stats database first, there are already more than enough websites out there covering Formula 1 statistics. --
2027:. Also, we do not "follow other similar articles" because they are similar, but because all the articles are part of the same WikiProject, thus it would be appropriate to have consistency across the articles. Fact is, this
1981:
Since the tag says "Official Name", we should use the official name used on the official website, not follow other similar articles and follow their naming and assume that is the official one just because majority uses it.
1464:
it could use either, being used widely in both. However it was originally created using British English. Just remember guys, if it has been stable at one spelling for years, consider whether it really needs to change back.
650:, and since we are on this topic, I may reopen the debate over flags. Removing them in this case is removing information on nationalities. Are we going to consider adding a column for nationality in place of flags then?--
1045:
as a 'complete' example of a normal GP, then the length of the article compared with tables is roughly 50/50 at my screen resolution. If key championship pre-race positions need clarifying, then it can be done in prose.
664:
Everybody calm. The discussion can take place here, but I still believe that you should explain why he should come here to discuss it by messaging him, rather than leaving it in the exceptionally short edit summaries.
774:
But what if there is a driver in the Top 5/6 in the point standings who is not anywhere else in the race report due to injury? Michael Schumacher comes to mind as being well up in the points before he broke his leg.
1835:
Well the "official" F1 site states "2008 Formula 1 SingTel Singapore Grand Prix", and it ought to be official enough for us to use it, and for it override stuff like chicanery.com, or anything else for that matter.
998:
No, we are an encyclopedia and people don't know what the standings were at that point where as we only show the last standings by the end which are useful but I don't want to work out the standings at that point.
1624:"It's not the 9th SingTel Singapore Grand Prix, it is the 9th Grand Prix held in Singapore, but this is NOT the official name. Official name used on SingaporeGP.sg is "2008 Formula 1 SingTel Singapore Grand Prix""
1652:
It is still the ninth. The sponsor may change anytime, but the race is still the Singapore Grand Prix, which is in its ninth race. All other articles in the F1 series use the original convention, why should the
1490:
Where did all this misplaced nationalism come from all of a sudden? Knowledge (XXG) is an international collaboration, let's keep it collaborative and not try to impose unjustified spelling conventions. Go read
1733:
I'd agree with Pyrope that the official name is what the organizers deem it to be. IX Singapore Grand Prix is something that's (as far as I can tell) been made up to fit in with other GP's that use that style.
1064:
look in the article before. I've seen it being used and the whole reason I joined was because I wanted to add things I thought this place needed and as the audience wanted. Fine no pre- but definitely post-.
469:
I thought we agreed to add post-race standings, although I didn't agree with it. There was no discussion on pre-race standings as far as I recall, and I thought we agreed no flags in the standings tables...
737:
741:
1332:"Tire" is an English spelling too - American English. But I fully agree with everyone here that "tyre" is the way forward, except for specifically American / Canadian articles as and where necessary.
1967:
So we should ignore a valid issue just because there are "far more productive things we could be doing?" If you want to do something else then don't take part in this discussion, each to their own.
1539:
Pyrope and Narson: I think you're agreeing! Has anyone formally described the apparent inverse law linking the amount of time we spend discussing (or arguing) with the importance of the topic :D.
1268:
Phill, up to a pointĀ :). American drivers - probably most appropriate to use American spelling as their careers will almost always involve significant amounts of competition in the States (see
259:
An editor has suggested to me that we need to change the colours of the results tables to a more "brutal" gold / silver / bronze scheme, rendering them hideous, in my opinion. He's changed the
601:
Relevancy or otherwise, kindly do not bait another editor into an edit war. I just had the misfortune of loosing an edit in the midst of an edit conflict resulting from your edit warring.--
481:
Is this about what I added. This has been on other pages before so I thought I'd nick it and add it seeimg as we re now in the last 3 races. Sorry about flags, I thought nice touch.
1247:
Of course a majority of our articles should be with the European spelling. However, articles on American/Canadian drivers/races/teams/cars should be spelt the American way.Ā ;-) --
1027:
with all the info they can possibly need. That's the whole point of the season article. There's no sense in repeating this stuff, in text or in tabular form, over and over again.
1930:
We could use the official name only in the lead and keep infobox free of sponsors, thus chronicling GPs. This might require significant cleanup in past articles though. Such as
2143:
2138:
2133:
2121:
2116:
2108:
706:
543:
535:
246:
241:
236:
224:
219:
211:
1280:. Not necessarily for races, where there may be very little US/Canadian involvement and thus it's not at all obvious that American English is the most suitable variant. See
539:
2041:
If you expect to have consistency, then don't name that field as "Official Name". If you expect the real official one, then don't expect consistency. Make up your mind. --
310:
Please do. I told the guy I wouldn't revert it myself, it seemed a little arbitrary on my part. I think another editor's condemnation of the new colours would be better.
1902:
It's good enough for Singapore though, which is what we require right now. I don't think we need to use the same sources across the whole range of race articles, do we?
374:
You could have brought it up in a more dispassionate manner - talk about stacking the deck before the discussion takes place: "brutal" "hideous" "personally, I hate it"
403:
Mark's probably got a point - the first comment may tend to colour the rest - although asking the person bringing the point up not to comment does seem a bit unfair. I
1287:
In any case, Falcadore has hit the nail on the head: it's not a useful thing to waste time on. Let's get some of our weaker articles up to snuff instead. Cheers.
905:? Complete with yet another set of flags? How long before we have a set of tables after each lap? I give up, I really don't remember that being discussed here.
1619:. What is our position? Clearly we'd need to change all our race articles if we adopted the latter style. Also, the editor has included a note in the code -
811:
It just seems very half-hearted and it creates inconsistency across the season. These things should either be added or dropped, not thrown in here and there.
2165:
2160:
744:
FAC's - if it was a big concern, it would have definitely been raised at the FAC. I don't see it too much of a problem (at least to edit-war over) myself.
360:
I was fairly sure it wouldn't be popular, but in my new spirit of being nice to people, I thought I'd bring it here rather than dismiss it out of hand :o)
789:
Exactly. And we can't just have one flag, cause that would look out of place. We need consistancy, and I don't see anything wrong with putting flags in.
568:
We now have an editor who has created an entirely different table, with all kinds of irrelevant information, and he is insisting on its insertion in the
125:
2096:
199:
132:
17:
825:
I agree. And also, how significant is it to add a reference to such a table? Or should they be left to themselves, like classification tables?
1186:
448:
What is the call on writing pre- and/or post championship standings on individual race pages? There have been couple of recent additions (
115:
111:
101:
64:
1670:
I agree with our current format, but there remains a query unanswered. Where are the names currently used in all articles sourced from?
1305:
Sorry it's an English encyclopedia so we use the English spelling which is tyre. Most of the audience is European. Why change it?
1716:
1450:
800:
2023:
Yes, the official name is "2008 SingTel Singapore Grand Prix", but not "I SingTel Singapore Grand Prix" as you have done with
1949:
about something that is just not justified. As someone above mentioned, we have far more productive things we could be doing.
39:
1821:
Exactly. I think we are just going to have to wait until the Autocourse yearbooks and stuff for this season are released.Ā :|
1252:
1712:
1281:
857:
For sure there's no deadline - but I suspect there's actually no intent anywhere to spread these things across the board.
1405:
1347:
1306:
1108:
1066:
999:
482:
296:
I agree also. The "gold" looks more like a mustardy colour. The "bronze" is a horrid brown. Please can we revert this?
534:
I dug up some of the archives and found most of the instances where the stand was against addition of this data, viz.
1134:
As far as I can tell, since the new position was agreed, no editor has been removing post-race tables from articles.
2087:
190:
546:. As for the FAs that 4u1e mentioned, use of references seemed to be the factor considered against their removal.
1870:*psst*, look at the picture on the right. Big board behind Schumacher. Fuji Television Japanese Grand Prix.Ā ;)
1654:
1604:
1190:
569:
2065:
2050:
2036:
1991:
1976:
1962:
1943:
1925:
1911:
1897:
1879:
1865:
1847:
1830:
1816:
1801:
1777:
1758:
1743:
1724:
1705:
1679:
1661:
1646:
1593:
1548:
1534:
1508:
1485:
1455:
1426:
1399:
1368:
1346:
Ah that's American-English not English. If there's that much fuss then create a American-English Encyclopedia.
1341:
1327:
1296:
1256:
1239:
1220:
1205:
1194:
1162:
1143:
1129:
1102:
1087:
1055:
1042:
1036:
1020:
992:
974:
960:
943:
929:
914:
902:
881:
866:
852:
834:
820:
805:
784:
769:
753:
726:
714:
689:
674:
659:
640:
625:
610:
596:
581:
555:
529:
513:
503:
463:
438:
416:
398:
383:
369:
354:
333:
319:
305:
291:
272:
1060:
But that only gives the final result and none of the articles I see have the post race thing so how could they
45:
1153:
pre-race point score appears already as the post score on the previous grand prix and on the summary page. --
1931:
1907:
1843:
1754:
1412:
1404:
He sounds English and it just seems that this place is advertised or spoken more in this country (England).
1354:
1337:
1313:
1115:
1098:
1073:
1032:
1006:
970:
910:
862:
816:
765:
685:
636:
621:
577:
517:
489:
475:
434:
365:
315:
268:
1637:. I would have reverted myself but I've already reverted it once and I want to make sure I have consensus.
1201:
All formula one articles have always been written with the spelling "tyres". I am against changing them. -
1182:
1939:
1720:
1675:
830:
551:
459:
329:
1093:
just magically appear because we agree a consensus to include them - someone actually has to add them.
840:
1789:
278:
I agree. The colour is too strong and makes my eyes involuntarily unfocus when I look at the table.--
1764:
1445:
1382:
988:
795:
2033:
1658:
1580:
1248:
1235:
1202:
1158:
956:
2042:
1983:
1492:
1041:
Agree with Bretonbanquet on this one. Race reports are drowning in tables already, if we consider
1903:
1839:
1750:
1333:
1273:
1094:
1028:
966:
906:
858:
812:
761:
681:
632:
617:
573:
471:
430:
361:
311:
264:
260:
141:
92:
508:
From memory, we'd always previously agreed against adding standings to individual race reports,
616:- I'll ask you personally next time I make an edit, to make sure I'm not conflicting with you.
2046:
1987:
1935:
1671:
826:
655:
606:
547:
455:
325:
1419:
1361:
1320:
1122:
1080:
1013:
496:
1972:
1956:
1921:
1893:
1875:
1861:
1826:
1812:
1797:
1773:
1699:
1642:
1525:
1502:
1476:
1393:
1216:
965:
I totally agree - we need to avoid turning this into another version of FORIX or something.
939:
877:
848:
780:
749:
722:
670:
592:
379:
301:
647:
2061:
1739:
1440:
1139:
1051:
984:
925:
790:
394:
285:
86:
920:
That's the first time I've seen it - I suspect once the event is run, it'll be removed.
1589:
1544:
1292:
1269:
1231:
1154:
952:
525:
412:
350:
2154:
1514:
Switching ancillary articles whose scope goes beyond F1 is a bit presumptuous of us.
1885:
1853:
1837:
651:
602:
1934:
which says 60th Santander British GP, while Santander started sponsoring in 2007.
1792:
rather unfortunately in this case goes with 'I SingTel Singapore Grand Prix'....
2095:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1968:
1951:
1917:
1889:
1871:
1857:
1822:
1808:
1793:
1769:
1694:
1638:
1517:
1497:
1468:
1388:
1378:
1212:
935:
873:
844:
776:
745:
718:
666:
588:
375:
297:
198:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
107:
263:
article as a test, and I said I'd ask here for comment. Persoanlly, I hate it.
2057:
1735:
1461:
1436:
1432:
1135:
1047:
921:
390:
280:
110:, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to
82:
1688:
Both the official race website and the official F1 website give the name as
1633:
the ninth Singapore Grand Prix. All eight preceding races were known as the
1585:
1540:
1288:
521:
408:
346:
516:, which does include them. I guess the current consensus is to have them.
454:) and I thought I should check with others before simply reverting them.
407:
didn't like the colours though, even if everyone else had loved them....
901:
Are we really having pre-race standings tables now as well, as per the
572:
article. I'll revert it once more and direct him here for discussion.
324:
Reverted. I guess it was worse on Schumacher page. With so many wins!
983:
problems like this by avoiding inevitably incomplete info like this.
76:
58:
705:
Yep, we always used to be against the "Standings after race" until
512:
most recently when the question came up again for D.M.N.'s FAC for
2074:
177:
25:
1616:
736:
On the flags issue, this was never brought up in either the
106:, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to
38:
This page does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2024:
710:
452:
449:
934:Yeah, I'm not sure why Chubbennaitor added that...
345:For the record, I really don't like it either.
114:and help with any of the tasks or consult the
8:
1852:That's good for present events, but not for
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Formula One
1690:2008 Formula 1 SingTel Singapore Grand Prix
1613:2008 Formula 1 SingTel Singapore Grand Prix
1603:An editor has changed the official name in
1373:Careful Chub. Take a look: Knowledge (XXG)
53:
1179:I changed the spelling of tyre to tire.
31:
29:
1615:, stating that that is what it says on
150:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Formula One
55:
2093:Do not edit the contents of this page.
196:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1715:just says "Grand Prix of Singapore".
1579:Does anyone know if there's a reason
1439:. I think we should keep it as tyre.
7:
1763:The editor has now started editing
44:It is of interest to the following
2166:NA-importance Formula One articles
2161:Project-Class Formula One articles
24:
1884:Yeah, but it's not like that for
2078:
1916:As of yet they are unsourced...
1856:where the sponsor isn't listed.
181:
153:Template:WikiProject Formula One
85:
75:
57:
30:
1713:International Sporting Calendar
1609:IX SingTel Singapore Grand Prix
1495:, then go write something new.
1944:19:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1926:19:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1912:19:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1898:19:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1880:19:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1866:18:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1848:18:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1831:18:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1817:18:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1802:18:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1778:18:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1759:18:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1744:18:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1725:17:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1706:14:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1680:10:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1662:10:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1647:08:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1594:05:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1427:19:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1400:16:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1369:15:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1342:19:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1328:19:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1297:17:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1257:15:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1240:02:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1221:02:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1206:02:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1195:01:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1163:22:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1144:19:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1130:19:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1103:18:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1088:15:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1056:22:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1037:19:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1021:19:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
993:02:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
975:23:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
961:23:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
944:23:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
930:23:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
915:22:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
882:21:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
867:21:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
853:21:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
835:20:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
821:20:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
806:20:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
785:20:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
770:20:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
754:20:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
727:20:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
690:20:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
675:20:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
660:20:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
641:20:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
626:19:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
611:19:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
597:19:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
582:19:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
556:18:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
530:18:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
504:18:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
464:17:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
417:23:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
399:22:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
384:19:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
370:17:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
355:17:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
334:17:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
320:17:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
306:17:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
292:17:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
273:17:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1282:2005 United States Grand Prix
715:the referenced, nicer version
439:15:11, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
2066:12:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
2051:03:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
2037:17:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1992:16:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1977:16:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1963:15:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1549:19:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1535:16:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1509:15:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1486:13:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1456:12:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1107:Well then why remove them?
2182:
1655:2008 Singapore Grand Prix
1605:2008 Singapore Grand Prix
570:2008 Singapore Grand Prix
444:Standings on race reports
118:for further information.
70:
52:
1043:1995 Japanese Grand Prix
903:2008 Japanese Grand Prix
520:(also FA) has them too.
514:1995 Japanese Grand Prix
518:1995 Pacific Grand Prix
102:WikiProject Formula One
1627:
1431:I have recently moved
1253:Review this GA review!
98:This page is part of
2091:of past discussions.
1807:That is plain wrong.
1692:. That's what it is.
1621:
1278:and probably for cars
1245:Disagree, to a point:
194:of past discussions.
1765:Singapore Grand Prix
1657:be any different? -
1635:Singapore Grand Prix
1617:the official website
1383:Wikimedia Foundation
1264:with OP, agree with
648:consensus can change
156:Formula One articles
1581:Alejandro de Tomaso
1575:Alejandro de Tomaso
1276:). Same for teams,
1274:Juan Pablo Montoya
711:the typical IP one
261:Michael Schumacher
142:Portal:Formula One
93:Formula One portal
40:content assessment
2149:
2148:
2103:
2102:
2097:current talk page
1599:Singapore GP name
1381:is American, the
1185:comment added by
252:
251:
206:
205:
200:current talk page
176:
175:
172:
171:
168:
167:
2173:
2130:
2105:
2104:
2082:
2081:
2075:
1959:
1954:
1702:
1697:
1533:
1530:
1522:
1505:
1500:
1484:
1481:
1473:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1424:
1417:
1410:
1396:
1391:
1366:
1359:
1352:
1325:
1318:
1311:
1197:
1127:
1120:
1113:
1085:
1078:
1071:
1018:
1011:
1004:
803:
798:
793:
501:
494:
487:
290:
288:
283:
233:
208:
207:
185:
184:
178:
158:
157:
154:
151:
148:
112:join the project
95:
90:
89:
79:
72:
71:
61:
54:
35:
34:
33:
26:
2181:
2180:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2151:
2150:
2126:
2079:
1957:
1952:
1700:
1695:
1601:
1577:
1526:
1518:
1515:
1503:
1498:
1477:
1469:
1466:
1460:In the case of
1451:
1446:
1441:
1420:
1413:
1406:
1394:
1389:
1362:
1355:
1348:
1321:
1314:
1307:
1255:
1187:142.161.180.251
1180:
1177:
1123:
1116:
1109:
1081:
1074:
1067:
1014:
1007:
1000:
801:
796:
791:
734:
497:
490:
483:
446:
286:
281:
279:
257:
229:
182:
155:
152:
149:
146:
145:
91:
84:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2179:
2177:
2169:
2168:
2163:
2153:
2152:
2147:
2146:
2141:
2136:
2131:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2111:
2101:
2100:
2083:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1728:
1727:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1665:
1664:
1629:Now, the race
1600:
1597:
1576:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1300:
1299:
1285:
1270:Mario Andretti
1259:
1251:
1242:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
980:
979:
978:
977:
948:
947:
946:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
733:
730:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
628:
599:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
445:
442:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
256:
253:
250:
249:
244:
239:
234:
227:
222:
217:
214:
204:
203:
186:
174:
173:
170:
169:
166:
165:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
140:Help out with
137:
129:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
62:
50:
49:
43:
36:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2178:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2156:
2145:
2142:
2140:
2137:
2135:
2132:
2129:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2110:
2107:
2106:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2089:
2084:
2077:
2076:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2035:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2019:
2018:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1961:
1960:
1955:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1904:Bretonbanquet
1901:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1886:all the races
1883:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1840:Bretonbanquet
1838:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1766:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1751:Bretonbanquet
1747:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1698:
1691:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1626:
1625:
1620:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1598:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1582:
1574:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1531:
1529:
1523:
1521:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1506:
1501:
1494:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1482:
1480:
1474:
1472:
1463:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1418:
1416:
1411:
1409:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1392:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1360:
1358:
1353:
1351:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1334:Bretonbanquet
1331:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1319:
1317:
1312:
1310:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1174:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1121:
1119:
1114:
1112:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:Bretonbanquet
1091:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1079:
1077:
1072:
1070:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:Bretonbanquet
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1012:
1010:
1005:
1003:
995:
994:
990:
986:
976:
972:
968:
967:Bretonbanquet
964:
963:
962:
958:
954:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
932:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:
917:
916:
912:
908:
907:Bretonbanquet
904:
883:
879:
875:
870:
869:
868:
864:
860:
859:Bretonbanquet
856:
855:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
813:Bretonbanquet
809:
808:
807:
804:
799:
794:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
762:Bretonbanquet
758:
757:
756:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
731:
729:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
691:
687:
683:
682:Bretonbanquet
678:
677:
676:
672:
668:
663:
662:
661:
657:
653:
649:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
633:Bretonbanquet
629:
627:
623:
619:
618:Bretonbanquet
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
598:
594:
590:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
574:Bretonbanquet
571:
567:
566:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
506:
505:
502:
500:
495:
493:
488:
486:
480:
479:
477:
473:
472:Bretonbanquet
468:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
443:
441:
440:
436:
432:
431:Bretonbanquet
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
362:Bretonbanquet
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
312:Bretonbanquet
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
293:
289:
284:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
265:Bretonbanquet
262:
254:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
232:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
215:
213:
210:
209:
201:
197:
193:
192:
187:
180:
179:
164:
144:
143:
138:
136:
134:
130:
128:
127:
122:
121:
120:
119:
117:
113:
109:
105:
104:
103:
94:
88:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
66:
63:
60:
56:
51:
47:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
2127:
2092:
2086:
2028:
2020:
1950:
1936:LeaveSleaves
1788:
1749:to be made.
1693:
1689:
1686:
1672:LeaveSleaves
1634:
1630:
1628:
1623:
1622:
1612:
1608:
1602:
1578:
1527:
1519:
1496:
1478:
1470:
1421:
1414:
1407:
1387:
1374:
1363:
1356:
1349:
1322:
1315:
1308:
1277:
1265:
1261:
1244:
1227:
1178:
1124:
1117:
1110:
1082:
1075:
1068:
1061:
1015:
1008:
1001:
996:
981:
900:
827:LeaveSleaves
735:
704:
548:LeaveSleaves
509:
498:
491:
484:
456:LeaveSleaves
447:
427:
404:
344:
326:LeaveSleaves
258:
230:
195:
189:
139:
131:
123:
116:project page
100:
99:
46:WikiProjects
2085:This is an
1379:Jimbo Wales
1181:āPreceding
841:WP:DEADLINE
255:Key colours
188:This is an
147:Formula One
135:the project
108:Formula One
65:Formula One
2155:Categories
2144:ArchiveĀ 20
2139:ArchiveĀ 19
2134:ArchiveĀ 18
2128:ArchiveĀ 17
2122:ArchiveĀ 16
2117:ArchiveĀ 15
2109:ArchiveĀ 10
1717:82.16.96.4
1462:Slick tyre
1437:Slick tyre
1433:Slick tire
1377:American.
1062:, or hell,
985:Apterygial
839:First off
713:, and see
247:ArchiveĀ 20
242:ArchiveĀ 19
237:ArchiveĀ 18
231:ArchiveĀ 17
225:ArchiveĀ 16
220:ArchiveĀ 15
212:ArchiveĀ 10
2025:this diff
1854:past ones
1790:ChicaneF1
1493:WP:ENGVAR
1232:Falcadore
1211:English.
1155:Falcadore
953:Falcadore
126:task list
124:View the
2034:oahiyeel
1932:this one
1659:oahiyeel
1262:Disagree
1228:Disagree
1203:oahiyeel
1183:unsigned
1175:Ti(y)res
2088:archive
2043:MrJacky
2021:Comment
1984:MrJacky
742:Pacific
652:Huaiwei
603:Huaiwei
587:best.
191:archive
133:Discuss
1969:Readro
1918:Readro
1890:D.M.N.
1872:The359
1858:D.M.N.
1823:D.M.N.
1809:Readro
1794:D.M.N.
1770:Readro
1639:Readro
1520:Narson
1471:Narson
1266:Skully
1213:The359
936:The359
874:The359
845:D.M.N.
777:The359
746:D.M.N.
719:D.M.N.
709:. See
667:The359
589:The359
510:except
405:really
376:Mark83
298:Readro
287:(talk)
42:scale.
2058:AlexJ
1953:Pyrop
1888:. =P
1736:AlexJ
1696:Pyrop
1607:from
1499:Pyrop
1452:Tomos
1442:Cadan
1408:Chubb
1390:Pyrop
1350:Chubb
1309:Chubb
1249:Phill
1136:AlexJ
1111:Chubb
1069:Chubb
1048:AlexJ
1002:Chubb
922:AlexJ
802:Tomos
792:Cadan
738:Japan
732:Flags
485:Chubb
391:AlexJ
282:Diniz
16:<
2062:talk
2047:talk
1988:talk
1973:talk
1940:talk
1922:talk
1908:talk
1894:talk
1876:talk
1862:talk
1844:talk
1827:talk
1813:talk
1798:talk
1774:talk
1755:talk
1740:talk
1721:talk
1711:The
1676:talk
1643:talk
1590:talk
1586:4u1e
1545:talk
1541:4u1e
1528:Talk
1479:Talk
1422:itor
1415:enna
1364:itor
1357:enna
1338:talk
1323:itor
1316:enna
1293:talk
1289:4u1e
1272:and
1236:talk
1217:talk
1191:talk
1159:talk
1140:talk
1125:itor
1118:enna
1099:talk
1083:itor
1076:enna
1052:talk
1033:talk
1016:itor
1009:enna
989:talk
971:talk
957:talk
940:talk
926:talk
911:talk
878:talk
863:talk
849:talk
831:talk
817:talk
781:talk
766:talk
750:talk
723:talk
707:here
686:talk
671:talk
656:talk
637:talk
622:talk
607:talk
593:talk
578:talk
552:talk
526:talk
522:4u1e
499:itor
492:enna
476:talk
460:talk
451:and
435:talk
413:talk
409:4u1e
395:talk
380:talk
366:talk
351:talk
347:4u1e
330:talk
316:talk
302:talk
269:talk
1631:was
1611:to
1435:to
740:or
2157::
2113:ā
2064:)
2049:)
2029:is
1990:)
1982:--
1975:)
1942:)
1924:)
1910:)
1896:)
1878:)
1864:)
1846:)
1829:)
1815:)
1800:)
1776:)
1757:)
1742:)
1723:)
1678:)
1645:)
1592:)
1547:)
1532:ā¢
1524:~
1516:--
1483:ā¢
1475:~
1467:--
1447:ap
1375:is
1340:)
1295:)
1238:)
1219:)
1193:)
1161:)
1142:)
1101:)
1054:)
1035:)
991:)
973:)
959:)
942:)
928:)
913:)
880:)
865:)
851:)
833:)
819:)
797:ap
783:)
768:)
752:)
725:)
717:.
688:)
673:)
658:)
639:)
624:)
609:)
595:)
580:)
554:)
542:,
538:,
528:)
478:)
462:)
437:)
415:)
397:)
382:)
368:)
353:)
332:)
318:)
304:)
271:)
216:ā
2099:.
2060:(
2045:(
1986:(
1971:(
1958:e
1938:(
1920:(
1906:(
1892:(
1874:(
1860:(
1842:(
1825:(
1811:(
1796:(
1772:(
1753:(
1738:(
1719:(
1701:e
1674:(
1641:(
1588:(
1543:(
1504:e
1395:e
1336:(
1291:(
1284:.
1234:(
1215:(
1189:(
1157:(
1138:(
1097:(
1050:(
1031:(
987:(
969:(
955:(
938:(
924:(
909:(
876:(
861:(
847:(
829:(
815:(
779:(
764:(
748:(
721:(
684:(
669:(
654:(
635:(
620:(
605:(
591:(
576:(
550:(
544:3
540:2
536:1
524:(
474:(
458:(
433:(
411:(
393:(
378:(
364:(
349:(
328:(
314:(
300:(
267:(
202:.
48::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
