Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 75

3732:

themselves after her in the 1960s, and more recently she's been paid homage on RuPaul's Drag Race), there is no extant evidence that she herself identified or engaged in any same-sex activity. She actively disavowed homosexuals during her lifetime, going so far as to disown one of her children when he came out. This of course isn't necessarily proof, as there's been plenty of examples of internalized homophobia in history. But I couple this with tracing claims as to her sexuality. I've followed all the sources that are listed in her article alluding to same-sex relationships and found that they all lead to a single, likely dubious source. They do not present any unique evidence, they just claim the one source as valid, which sort of hides the fact that all of this stems from one throwaway sentence in a biography written by someone who had a complicated relationship with her, who also stood to benefit by cloaking her in exotic mystique. One wrinkle here is that I do not read French, and since Baker spent most of her life in France there may exist more concrete evidence in French-language sources.

4385:. No matter how one feels about Sargeant's POV, as Wikipedians we have to put our personal feelings aside and write neutrally. For one of the founders of Pride to be assaulted at Pride is notable. This deals with an issue in the community that is notable, difficult, and deserving of coverage. Others, mostly IPs and newer or low-use accounts, do not feel it should be covered, and are blanking the content. There's discussion on talk. Would appreciate more eyes on this, especially those experienced with how weird the press has been about these conflicts in recent years. We have one gay press source covering this, and one local one, but the others tend to lean conservative. However, the sourcing is sufficient, and even the conservative-leaning ones are are still usable as long as the text is neutral. (This problem with which outlets will even cover incidents is one we've had to deal with in recent years with sourcing on some of these controversies. Pretending it's not an ongoing issue is not helpful but some are either unaware or using it to push POV). Thanks. - 4101:

criminals involved. If they're using Knowledge in the way we suggest they use it, they're using it as a launchpad for further research and following the sources we're providing. Our text should not drift very far from what the sources are saying. The sources are using pronouns that applied to this woman at the time they were written – he/him. We're asking a lot of our readers if we require them to read an article of ours that uses she/her and then visit sources that say he/him, not least because we are, in effect, rewriting what those sources say. For our readers, we need a compromise.

1763:, which I see above has been discussed. When I noticed last week that the original list didn't include some quite prominently out footballers, I wondered if the gaps were bigger and went to dig up a list of LGBT+ footballers and cross-check with who was in the Olympics, and added several that had outside sources. Sometimes these sources were just social media posts, but those have long been accepted for other relationships (including other people on the list who had been already included before I got involved). But the source for Heath and Press was 4851: 3268: 2971: 2776:

popularity of the name Maxine in the 20th cantury, and Max as a given name for female babies, but another user reverted my edits, and used derogatory language and ultimately threatened to sanction me for "edit warring". I feel I provided enough sources and resources to edit the article, but I am honestly exhausted and scared to continue. This was my first, and probably last time engaging with Knowledge. I leave this here in the hopes someone else with more power than an anonymous IP address can settle this. Here is the talk page with sources:

2612: 2175:

possible to add his name to the list of LGBT figures where profiles are being sought. However, the listing for musicians suggests they should be entered on "Music", a different topic list. That list has mostly classical composers and no section related to popular music, musicals, or cabaret music and it doesn’t appear to be LGBT-specific. I believe Tom easily meets the notability standards and am looking for advice about how to facilitate the creation of a page.

4182:(I use 'queer' as a shorthand for our alphabet soup; I'm happy to identify as queer myself because it was an insult that was common when I was young. I have reclaimed it for myself and it has no power over me now. The experiences of other people are different, and I freely invite you to use your own terms for yourselves and to mentally edit my preferred term to fit what suits you. I will be unoffended by your lived experience just as you will be by mine.) — 1881: 278: 31: 4605:-type reference. As they are not notable enough to require that, and as presumably they are basically a private individual under their new name, perhaps the best route is to eschew including a name altogether. While that would not avoid the pronoun issue, it does mean that we're less likely to have people coming in with good intentions saying "whoops, they say the performer is Newname, and I remember well that their name was Oldname". -- 4111:(or infamy) lies entirely with their previous gender identity. We need to allow for that, now and again, without setting a precedent either way. It's something of a reasonability test – a common thing in jurisprudence in ex-British countries but unknown elsewhere and an anathema in the US where the text itself is the most important thing – where we say "what would a reasonably intelligent person reasonably expect from this?" 3566:" (censured here to now disturb readers). Such redirects shouldn't be present on Knowledge, as they are slurs, and part of the hate speech, and created by transphobic and homophobic people. This brought to my attention, that we should make sure, that this isn't a bigger precedence, and check if there are any other such hateful redirects on Knowledge, and if we find them, delete them. Thank you for your attention, sincerely, 3125: 417:

banner if it's on a BLP page by looking at if it's in a BLP category. Second, it is useful to some people, and it doesn't need to be used by all editors to be a net positive. Third, I think this wikiproject includes both BLPs and topical areas of a social science, and I am pretty sure all the other social science wikiprojects have an importance scale (eg. psychology, economics, sociology). Fourth, I think the

2717: 2128: 3867:. I started on some basic ce and expanding the lead, but then saw there was at least one previous AfD and some potential socking going on in that discussion. I'm going to step back from this draft. I'm also not familiar with some of the sources (News18, Outlook, Homegrown, and Livewire) so I don't have the confidence to say the sourcing is a slam dunk. If you have any questions I suggest you ask at the 429:. It's my opinion that having more metadata enables more efficient editing, irrespective of the workload assessment imposes (which I honestly think is rather low and entirely optional). Lastly, although the importance assessment process is subjective, I'll mention that in my experience the for vast majority of articles it is uncontroversial and because of this I consider it a net positive change. 3889:. I checked the sources. News18, Outlook, Homegrown, and Livewire are some of India's leading news publications. I see you have made some changes in the top section, but its the same as the one mentioned in the bottom section. Do you think we can take advice from more editors on this? I will definitely take it up to Teahouse as well. Can you put up a request over there as well? Thanks. 3506:, the former NFL player who was convicted of murder and killed himself in prison. A recent edit to the page got me thinking, is there a specific policy or consensus of when LGBT related categories are added to a page? I'm asking this because Hernandez himself never publicly came out as gay while he was still alive but a multitude of people that knew him have said he was. I don't think 3911:, which says the lead should be a short summary of information in the article. For the lead you'll want to quickly summarize the main sections of the article so readers can quickly know what the article is about. Of course you should definitely ask other editors for their opinions as well, but I'd encourage you to read the LEAD article first so you can expand and reword accordingly. 508:. If we have consensus within the project that a certain set of articles are of core relevance to our mandate, it could help editors identify which of those articles need work. (Though our list of core articles would need discussion and refinement first. And it has existed in some form for years, without attracting a flurry of work for the articles it lists.) 4526:, one of the cast members has been out as nonbinary for awhile and the article reflects how they identify currently, as is the guideline. Because they're not independently notable (though they're notable within the context of the linked article as they're basically the reason the series exists), there's no flashing sign (like a footnote or something) saying 4748: 4427: 3704: 2547: 1619: 5028: 4538:

probably wouldn't know about the change if you hadn't happened to have read about it from other sources like the person themself, other things they've worked on, etc. (though I don't know how much of this hypothesis is me doing AGF and how much is riding on the fact most don't change the other now-neutral gendered words, pronouns, etc.).

4541:

I tried pending changes protection once and it technically didn't do anything because no non-autoconfirmed users edited the article in that timeframe (only an autoconfirmed account did). Before I try for another round of protection, is there any other method I can use to try to reduce/eliminate these

4537:

Every few weeks, someone comes and changes most or all of the name mentions back to their former name. I suspect this is a case of the editor in question not knowing about the change rather than malicious changes since some parts of the official website for the product use their previous name and you

4149:

How can we write a balanced article about a sourced event without feeding the haters what they want? Well, the one thing we can do, perhaps they only thing we can do, is to divorce the crime from the gender identity. We won't succeed, but we can try. We can make it clear that the person who committed

4139:

of hate, and the haters are always looking for an excuse to run us through with swords. That this woman committed a terrible crime and is trans will – I do mean will – be used to claim that all trans people are terrible criminals. It's nonsense, but that's what they did to gay people in the 1970s and

4110:

Now, that's not everywhere, and not in all circumstances, and not something to be applied with a broad brush or written down on tablets of stone. For 99% of articles, the change of pronouns is unimportant and readers can cope with it. But just now and again – an edge case – we find someone whose fame

3989:

As someone that has mainly been fixing smaller typos and adding a fact here and there during her downtime at work, I am not well versed enough in the details of how to resolve conflicts like these. Not having created an account in all my years here does not help either :) I really would appreciate a

3847:

which is a stub about a queer poet from India. Editors, please see if you can help get this approved? The topic was declined from inclusion some time ago because they did not meet the notability guidelines. but, note that there is now a different set of sources in the draft, so I think it would be OK

455:

we should be wary of spending too much effort on classifying how poor quality our articles are when we could instead be spending effort on improving articles. CleanupWorklistBot is predicated on a lot of energy going into adding maintenance categories and WikiProjects and importance ratings, but this

4253:

wrote a blog about them in May 2022, and Hayes' name appears a couple of times on Ovarit and Mumsnet, despite our misuse of pronouns (and possibly name). Hayes is just one among many convicted trans people used in this way. I think it's important to keep in mind that those folks are not operating in

4035:

I don't believe "edge-case" is a particularly good word for it. It's not particularly different from other articles that prominently feature trans people who didn't come out until after the subject was closed. The murder aspect makes it awkward, but the BLP philosophy applies just the same. The only

4020:

Honest question - how is this an edge case? She is a woman, she should be referred to as such. There is no ambiguity involved - and do not forget this is about the validity of *all* trans people. Same logic as how you do not get to - sorry for the crass example - call a black person the n word, just

4004:

The ongoing discussion on the talk page seems to be productive (although editors, including yourself, are being a bit combative in places). Our rules can’t cover all edge cases, and this is an edge case, so the discussion there may well be very helpful when it feeds back into our rules and guidance.

3778:

Thanks for chiming in. I think the point about consensus is the most important here. Setting aside opinions about the historicity of Jean-Claude's biography, the fact that every source I followed pointed back to that singular biography is the signal to me that there is no consensus. Then again there

3317:

threshold yet. I’m not seeing much in the way of significant coverage from reliable sources in the first 3 pages of a google of her and what’s there is mostly (vastly mostly) bigots complaining that she even exists. So at the moment I’d not expect an article on her to survive a CSD-A7 challenge, let

2174:

Colleagues, I’m not an experienced Knowledge editor but am interested in getting an article posted about Tom Wilson Weinberg, a well-known activist and composer of LGBT-themed music. He is currently well-referenced by others on Knowledge but doesn’t have a page of his own. I looked to see if it was

511:

I would oppose going through and categorizing the importance of all 22k articles. Even if an editor were willing to take that on, it would lead to disputes that would spill over into the project generally. And I don't think anyone will care whether someone else has categorized an article as "low" or

4519:

The edits are few and far between and usually but not always by IP addresses (such that pending changes protection didn't actually stop any because that happened to be the time an established account did the removal), so before I tried going to RFPP again, I wanted to try to ask for other solutions

2775:

A while ago I edited the article for the given name Max, which wrongly claims Max to be a masculine name. Max is short for a variety of names, including Maxine, which is a feminine given name. Max is also a name used by many non-binary people. I found several sources for Max being short for Maxine,

1772:

Without going back to the old discussion mentioned above, which seems to have closed thinking that there was nothing but conjecture (idk), what I'm asking for in this second part is if someone has the time, they could comb the list for anyone that might not be as "out" as BLP would like. I did make

850:

of falsifying quotes, and I might have come dangerously close to edit-warring. I do not want to cross that line. I am tired. Is anyone here interested in taking a look? I hope so for the sake of these articles; but I'll bow out and close my eyes to whatever mess continues if more eyes aren't on the

547:

we have to give recommendations to regional and international activist groups about what concepts in LGBT+ studies are priority for global development and translation. Like for example, if there were LGBT+ centers in New York City, Mumbai, Beijing, São Paulo, and Tehran, and somehow they all wanted

416:

The main reason I'm putting this idea forward (again) is because I think a couple of important considerations were not made previously. First, I agree there is some contentious aspect to ranking BLPs - and I imagine it's possible to make template code that omits the "importance: ???" section of the

4638:, a wp:bio about a queer Brazilian actor and was hoping that one of you would be kind enough to take a look and let me know how it could be improved. Or, if it looks ok, to move it to the mainspace. It seems to be languishing in the AFC backlog. Thank you in advance for your help and consideration. 4577:

edit their contents) so I wasn't sure if a hidden comment would be any more effective. Will take that into account, though! *jots that down on to do list for hopefully later today* (Definitely no stranger to "hidden comments and other things the user definitely saw aren't slowing them down because

4172:

Nevertheless, it's another indication of an edge case. We can't make good rules from an edge case, and we can't sensibly apply good rules to an edge case. But what we can do is talk about these things in good faith, without being combative, seeking a compromise that works first of all in favour of

2439:

This is my very first Knowledge entry and I have a connection to the subject of the article, so I don't think you're stepping on my toes. I tried to be objective and factual but need others to weigh in. I definitely needed help with the formatting and I am open to content editing, etc., as well...

842:

Perhaps I have not always handled it in the best way, so I might be partly to blame for the conflict, but things just keep getting worse. The articles are being slowly but surely degraded in quality by this editor, who is persistent and highly focused on adding their favourite themes of "torture"

618:

I'm lost. I tried to read some policy, and I think I did the right thing in edits. My changes on a couple were undone though. I dunno now. Don't want to do the wrong thing, and what do I know, anyway? but some of the those things put in by 1 or 2 people look strange. Is anyone able to tell me if I

334:

that one must either believe their (actually quite marginal) theory or else in unscientific folk theories. This page is not about an actual thing that people believe (or at least, this page has no evidence for that at present); rather, it's about a strawman that Blanchard and Bailey have set up to

196:

I don't know, I haven't really looked at the article and haven't edited it. I'm just flagging the inconsistency for others to resolve one way or the other if they think it's something that needs resolving. Feel free to edit and discuss other things as normal, just don't expect me to have knowledge

2898:

Acknowledged and you correct. Discussion goes on the target page and calls for comments should not predispose anyone to the way they should comment. Knowledge can only work when people follow the rules and I was in error. I left my errors visible but reworded. I regret and will not do this again.

2520:, which I've been trying to get to a WP:NPOV since May. If you check the edit history, there was a recent unhelpful page move, and many other edits that have moved it from an excessively "for" POV to one excessively "against". I'd never heard of the group till I ran across the article while doing 2218:

That's the issue. I do have a connection with the subject. I'm aware of the fact that it's a conflict of interest to write a "promotional" site on his behalf. But there's tons of documentary support for such a page (and many references to him from others' pages) so I'm looking to find some way to

3980:

It is my understanding that articles, especially but not only those of biographies on living persons, should respect an individual's gender identity. Editors do not get to invalidate an individual's gender identity because of unrelated issues, like their felon status. Respecting an individual's

3731:

I tried to start this discussion a few months ago on the Josephine Baker page but no one has responded. Maybe as a result I should just make a bold edit? But while she is undoubtedly a queer icon (sources at the GLBT Historical Society in San Francisco, for example, discuss drag queens modeling

1000:

The point is, it’s not a “slam dunk”, and to accuse an editor of homophobia because they haven’t accepted it is, in itself, not acceptable behavior on WP. What has the editor done besides not accepting the article to warrant that accusation? If that’s all there is, I would strike your comments,

412:

To summarise my understanding of the main points against the idea discussed previously: It might not be useful for all editors, it would be a lot of work to do all the assessment, and it's a subjective process especially around biographies of living people which can sometimes lead to conflict.

1751:

Also, there could be more discussion on including number (and %age) of medalists - previous discussions and what was in the lead of the previous article have me include them (as well as to use a reduced figure to calculate %age since two medals are from a demonstration event), but if anyone is

4100:

For the readers: What are they expecting to see when they visit this article? What will aid their understanding of the subject at hand most clearly? We can't know what they're looking for, obviously, but we can hazard a guess. They're wanting factual, sourced information about a crime and the

3752:

her putative foster son wrote a biography in which he says she was bisexual. It seems that is the premise upon which the categories are applied. If there is good reason to doubt such a biography and the secondary sources, such as Marjorie Garber's, that cite it, then we can doubt it. Per

3501:

Hello, I'm not a member of this project, and despite being an ally outside of Knowledge I don't usually edit LGBT related articles, it's primarily sports. But I do have a question that potentially falls under both. Even if you aren't a football fan, I'm sure most people have heard of

1892:

in 2013. She indeed says, "This is a symbol I created to represent transgender lesbians as well as cisgender lesbians who are in relationship with transgender lesbians." I'd be interested if there is a wider convention (pinging Adarkhairedone), but I have no evidence of that myself.

3243:

the question has been raised whether there is a general professional standard for the treatment of gender dysphoria. (The Society disputes the validity and effectiveness of the affirmative care model.) More expertise on this question (and more eyes on the page) would be helpful.

2993:

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at this TH question and see if they can help this person out. It might be better helpful if someone familiar with how such things on Knowledge steps in and tries to sort this out. Someone might also want to take a look at

3677:, an Indian interesex athlete who died by suicide in 2001. I was wondering if project members could give it a read - I don't think I've written a page who someone identified as intersex previously. Also, if anyone can find her date of death, I'd be very grateful - it might be 1321:

Re: the spotlight issue I wonder if you could recommend any articles or policies that address how the community balances notability and the desire to keep certain trends of queerphobia subterranean? Is it strictly determined by the amount of significant coverage from reliable

424:

One of the uses of the importance rating is to prioritise editing articles with higher encyclopedic merit. There are a handful of ways to filter priority in article searches which can be used to prioritise work, and one approach that I've liked is filtering by importance with

4456:

Hey everyone! I am JuanGLP, and here is an idea I have. Should we create aa WikiProject Drag? Or make it as a task force? We have plenty of drag shows that needed work (this will not include WikiProject Drag Race). It is just an idea that I would love to come into life. —

3432:

created at, because nobody's actually doing the work of comprehensively reviewing already-rated articles with an eye to revising the class ratings they were given at the start. That's a universal issue with Knowledge in general, not a failing unique to those two articles.

2219:

stimulate its creation without running afoul of that conflict of interest issue. I thought of suggesting that his name be added to the list of LGBTQ people who need pages written might be one route, but there is no "musicians" section for that list. Any other suggestions?

3736:

With all this in mind, I would like to untag her as an LGBT actress/individual until such time that more concrete sources are brought forward. To me, it feels irresponsible to make that claim on her behalf without having solid proof, and from what I see there is none.

1845:

if you just created these symbols yourself, whether the logical extension of other symbols there or an innovation of your own, they're not appropriate for the article. They can stay on Wikimedia Commons and, as you say, be used in userboxes if people like them. —

4120:

I posit that a reasonably intelligent person would reasonably expect that we follow the sources and use he/him, whilst very clearly noting that she is a she and she wants she/her to be used. Where that doesn't work, they/them is handy as it equally offends

3423:

aren't necessary since they already have project boxes on their talk pages. As for the ratings, the thing is that while articles are initially "rated" as of the time the talk page gets created, Wikipedians actually have very little if any follow-through on

4223:

As you recognize, your second argument (that dispassionately applying our policies on gender identity to convicted felons would generate culture war fodder) is not based in any of Knowledge's goals or policies, and has little sway one way or the other.

178:. I'm confused why for a biography most of the article is a listing of recipients of The Brenda Howard Memorial Award? It seems if it's notable it should be split to its own article. It doesn't add anything to the understanding of the subject's life. -- 557:

If we could actually come to agreement about a limited set of important articles, then I think we could really make a serious drive to improve them and translate them into every language. That might be a way to improve global LGBT+ cultural exchange.

4600:

Having said that... this is a weird borderline case. To the degree that this person is notable, they are notable under their old name, which they performed under. If this were sufficient notability that they had an article, we'd certainly include a

2727:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for whether to describe ROGD as pseudoscientific in the lead. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the 1235:" who illustrate and propagate a strange kind of transphobia and gender essentialism, to the point where some believe that nearly every famous person is an "EGI" or "Elite Gender Invert." The most notable instance of this conspiracy theory is the 4134:

based on Knowledge rules, but is something my generation of queers cares about (and you're free to dismiss my views here accordingly – note that I haven't edited the article, let alone edit warred over it). That point is that queer people get a

3639:, and redirects containing such, but importantly, those redirects point toward material focused on the slurs themselves, and don't treat them as if they were neutral synonyms for the groups they are a pejorative for. For example, the redirect 1544:

This deletion of a gay porn star and writer has been relisted twice. I would have favoured deletion of this article until I read the deletion discussion, but would encourage members of this WikiProject to give it the once-over and contribute.

3098:

POV associated with Genspect and the SEBGM. This happens from time to time, of course, but I expect we may be seeing more of it particularly if, as I suspect, off-wiki coordination is involved. Just posting here so others are also aware.

1376:

It should be self-evident that no source giving any credence to the claims of "transvestigators" is reliable; thus, it's either notable and can have an article that makes the truth of the matter clear, or it's not notable and would be

1269:

was trans as evidenced by her "male spine". It's a complete clown show and I'm not sure that it is suitable for an article. We don't want to give them the attention that they so obviously crave. Have a look for significant coverage in

993:, in looking at the draft, I can see why it was rejected via AfC. The sourcing isn’t the best I’ve ever seen, and the subject has very few articles solely about them or their work. Facebook should not be used as a source on a BLP. See 1041:

By the way, I declined the draft, not rejected it. I also worked on the previous version of the article subject when it was tendentiously resubmitted and then placed in mainspace briefly before it was AFD'ed and deleted in 2021.

4572:

Yeah, I just wasn't sure if that was enough because a few of the mentions of the person already have a ref named Liam (their current name) next to them and it was feeling like the reverters ignored those (they don't remove them

4531: 1072:, can the title be salted? It was deleted twice in 2021 (Aug & Feb), then resubmitted to AfC with accusations of homophobia when it wasn't accepted carte blanche. Seems like some very determined editors for a NN BLP. -- 4665: 1769:

through endless hope and demands and speculation, Tobin Heath and Christen Press got together, stayed together, came out individually in their own time, and then stepped out together — pinky-in-pinky! — on the ESPYS red

3985:

is not a bad faith editor, but merely uneducated on both the topic of gender identity and Knowledge rules covering these topics, and want to make it clear that I am not looking for disciplinary action against them.

3065:

which removed any mention of "Caitlyn Jenner". I can't determine whether such content was subsequently re-added and removed again, and the editor who made the September 2015 change has been indefinitely blocked. --

4402:

You seem to be overatating the quality of the sourcing on this "incident", which consists largely of editorial commentary and unreliable sourcing. But in any case, the views of additional editors would be helpful.

542:

as you say, agreement on such a number of core articles would be hard to achieve, but when leaving English Knowledge and going into Meta-wiki to coordinate multilingual development of LGBT+ content, somehow with

4211:

addresses both of these "edge cases" (in fact fairly common), and provides crystal-clear guidance on how to describe individuals who were notable pre-transition. It is the community's stance (and the result of

1294:. Other than that, it really hasn't made it into even LGBTQ press yet. If it gets RS sigcov in the future, could be an interesting article. But I don't think the topic meets notability requirements just yet. -- 3418:

Both of those articles already "indirectly" link here by virtue of being rated as articles within this project on their talk pages, so I would say that disambiguatory links leading here from the tops of the

1089:, are you asking that the draft spot be salted or the mainspace one? Has there been abuse of either spot? I know there used to be a number of usernames for Aditya Tiwari that were blocked prior to 2021 but 1359: 499:

Would it be possible for us to use the importance field for a limited number of articles, and leave it blank for the rest? I can see the value in brining some automated reporting to the list of articles at

3510:

is a good place for this discussion because this specific thing isn't related to his football career. I guess what I'm asking is should he have LGBT related categories on his page despite never coming out

1799:

Hi. I noticed we had a symbol for 'trans-female lesbian', but not for any other combinations, so I created others. I don't know if anyone would want such symbols , but if anyone does, they're listed at

1308:

Thank you both for your thoughts! With queerphobia on the rise in the US I fear this trend will become more popular. But for now I will set a google alert and quarantine it to my "cursed content" feed.

3318:

alone an AfD, and I’d expect it to be a magnet for every GC in the world to maliciously edit. But I could easily be proved wrong by a good draftspace article being created first, so of course YMMV. —

2928:

A discussion on whether Health Liberation Now, a conversion therapy watchdog organization which tracks the attacks on trans healthcare and forces behind them, should be considered a reliable source.

2087:

Wikimedia LGBT+ plans to request funding from the Wikimedia Foundation to organize a conversation series on major recurring social issues which arise in LGBT+ Wikimedia projects. See the proposal at

4022: 3020: 2946:

on the RSN noticeboard in a better format to faciliate discussion of various options including 1) using without in-text attribution 2) using with in-text attribution and 3) not using as a source.

3991: 3428:

articles for rating changes as the articles grow and develop. In truth, the only consistently reliable takeaway you can glean from any article's talk page "rating" is what class the article was

296:. Please feel free to comment in that discussion. Whether moved or not, improvements to the transgender genocide content would be welcome. See discussion for sources that could be used. cc: @ 835:

There's a long, tedious wrangle over sources and inserting things like "vigilante executions, vigilante attacks, torture, beatings, forced anal exams" into infoboxes at, among many others,

2291:· There are a few citations that exist but haven’t been tracked down yet for their final details (e.g., review from an old newspaper that will require a trip to the archives, etc.). 647: 1837:

Yes, this gallery needs good sourcing, due to the prevalence of individuals creating their own symbols to represent their identity. This type of section is prone to accumulating clutter.

1963:

is listed as a "Disambig-class" article, when I think it's clear that it isn't a disambiguation article, but an article in its own right. Would an editor mind reassessing the article? ~

1741:. That aspect of policy does say that simple addition and converting units (which is all that is being used) should be easily permissible, with more complex calculations being allowed 3914:

As for the Teahouse request, I'm not sure what you'd want me to ask. I'm going to leave any further requests for article expansion, editing, or general questions to you to pursue. --

2356:: I fixed some of your formatting, but don't have the energy to review the content or address other issues right now (your references need to be put in-line for example). Hopefully 3629: 1713:

Hello all! I haven't been able to put much time into WP lately, but what I have has been put into spending a few months splitting out and "completing" (as much as possible) the

2554: 2540: 596:

changes are strange to me too. Could someone else look, and if I have done the wrong thing put them back the way they were. I don't think those things are right, though. Also,

148:) agreed with the first and re-removed it. Given the presence in multiple other articles I think it would be useful to have a wider discussion here that leads to consistency. 4486: 2633: 1565: 1439:

article is looking decidedly promotional - and seems to have done for a while now. If anyone in this WikiProject can help improve this article, it would be much appreciated.

156: 1723:

article that I split the list from, which I've started - prose lists aren't really articles, but I'm hoping we'll end up with a quality list and article out of what it was.

4150:

the crime was a person who committed a crime, and they later revealed they were trans. The alternative is to hand straight people (no offence, allies) an instant victory:

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3275:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This discussion is an RfC on allowing use of neopronouns in articles and may be of interest to project members. Thanks. 4005:

But this can only happen if everybody involved assumes the good faith of everybody else there. There’s no deadline, so it is really worth letting it play out for now. —

4257:

As such I have to agree with the other editors present. This is not an edge case, and the article as it is current written goes pretty strongly against the guidance at

870:

Have just added three pages to the People watchlist that regularly have gay content removed by an editor who calls themselves 'William Oxford Orwigg'. The articles are

3612:

It's true that Knowledge does not censor encyclopedic material solely on the grounds of being objectionable. However, we regularly delete content when it is offensive

2577: 650:. She was the third woman to fly in space, and the first LGBT one. Reviewers welcome. It would be to seen some new reviewers. Or old ones. Or anybody at all actually. 1239:. That one in particular is a sickening example of how transphobia and gender essentialism can interact with racism and sexism. The investigative journalism podcast 1720: 839:. A new twist from the editor I have been at odds with is to put laws and cases relating to sex crimes and child abuse into these pages. I find this frightening. 2640:

in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!

1594: 479: 418: 2138:

has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the

4299:

is written down. That's how we work here. And that means edit wars and people bickering on talk pages and 3-decade RfCs, but there's nothing to be done because

2729: 4924: 2654: 4091:

There are two things that make this an edge case; one from the point of view of readers of an encyclopaedia and one from the point of view of queer politics.

1662:

Given that the subject is a man, that'd be "he", unless the subject has otherwise requested. Please just revert anyone who changes this without explanation.

1408: 847: 4163:

But that latter point is not supported by Knowledge policy, and should not be. Which is why I haven't edited the article, so call off the ArbCom dogs! :-)

4490: 3240: 2753: 1001:

apologize, AGF, and try to work collaboratively on creating an acceptable article, because you will not get far on WP hurling unwarranted accusations. —

2091: 1250:

Is it in the purview of Knowledge to cover, debunk, and explain the dimensions of phobia and bigotry involved in this family of conspiracy theories? --

774:(1906–1993), while looking closer at his notable father (Frederic Lister Burk, the founding former President of SFSU). Bois Burk has an archive at the 619:

did it wrong or if I can put it back again. This place is complicated. Left a message on the Maldives talk page, and will put one on the also reverted

2268:, if you create the draft, I will copy edit and make sure its formatted correctly before you submit for review. Just ping me if that's of interest! -- 2047: 1523: 1350:" (including outright nonsense), we must make clear what is either the mainstream view or the factual reality (depending on just how fringe it is).In 944:

is being held from inclusion due to homophobia. A user named "AngusWoof" keeps rejecting the draft, when changes were made by other Knowledge users.

4434: 4420: 3272: 3260: 1097:

was indeed involved in the August 2021 draft, but the August 2022 version is different from that as it includes a few lines of activity since 2021.

2782:"just because a few women may take the name, just to stand out, doesn't mean it's gender neutral; continue edit warring and you will be sanctioned" 3062: 2005: 1923:

to identify and clean up stale proposals. There are a couple of merge proposals that have been around for over six months without being resolved:

593:

page. In looking over the editor's log after, thought I made a mistake, as that person has edited a lot in LGBT pages for a long time. Some other

47: 17: 1318:

Yes, this is my biggest concern as well. As Daniel noticed, I'm a new contributor, so thank you for your guidance on what constitutes notability.

744: 3188: 2943: 2922: 2425:

toes, so I've stopped. My question is -- is editing someone else's draft a bad idea? I will revert my changes for now. Sorry about that. --

4249:

Culture warriors are going to culture war regardless of what we write on Knowledge. Hayes is already being used in this way on social media,

3678: 3016: 672: 1346:

we treat LGBT topics no different intrinsically to any other topic. If something is notable then it is notable; however, in articles about "

1236: 846:

I only want the articles to be accurate, or near-accurate. Wild tangents and synth and now sexual abuse brought into mix? I think I'm done,

3592: 2785: 1884:

was already being used on WP. I created the rest of the set based on that example. My file was based on the PNG, which was created by user

535: 159:). I have not looked at the claims in detail or any of the evidence and have no opinion about whether the term should be mentioned or not. 4489:

using a few sources I found listing asexual people, then double-checked sources to confirm sexuality. We have similar pages for lists of

4557:

Try adding comments like

3971: 3589: 2035: 1820: 836: 4026: 4683: 4233: 3995: 3656: 2628: 1123:

I was thinking mainspace, in case an SPA/IP/etc. moves a yet another new draft over. But perhaps not needed. Just thinking out loud! —

624: 604: 1411:, where a couple LGBTQ+ sources are discussed and categorized, such as PinkNews (generally reliable) and Pride.com (no consensus). -- 4069: 2421:

Hello. After reading this, I decided to try to assist in inlining the citations. I started, but I've realized I may be stepping on

2282:

Thanks for your advice. I’ve posted the draft page as far as I’ve gotten it, but definitely need some help and advice. Specifically:

1927: 512:"mid" importance; they will edit what interests them. Agreement on 120 articles of core relevance would be hard enough to achieve.-- 374: 293: 4154:

and other such JKRish nonsense. I'd rather not hand them such an easy win on something that is so very obviously complete bollocks.

843:

etc, however tenuous their sources. I think in a previous life, it has been ongoing at UAE since 2019, and elsewhere even earlier.

4265:

is somewhat egregiously against the consensus that we use pronouns that reflect a person's most recent expressed gender identity.

1737:, are based on the information; since it's all sourced (though, see request 2), basing the text on the lists should be fine under 997:. And there’s the issue of the podcast; while the BLP talks about the podcast, it never says the name (or perhaps I’m missing it). 4668:. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. 2524:. Hope my edits there show I'm just trying to get the article onto a more even keel. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, 1734: 1244: 531: 319: 237:

The same term is used in relation to Howard in several articles and books. Citogenesis or not, it has become a description. See

4979: 4955: 4947: 4703: 3192: 2247: 1458: 1112: 1057: 1374:

not recognized as a medical diagnosis by any major professional institution and is not backed by credible scientific evidence.

4893: 4889: 4262: 3967: 4355: 2288:· Some of the citations currently say “Same as above”, etc. I’m not sure how Knowledge notes the reuse of citations. 2285:· Certain of the supporting citations appeared in a huge font and I don’t see controls for font size to change that. 114:(the AIDS activist, not the football player) and would like to request a reassessment. It's currently rated as Start class. 4505: 4330: 3990:

third opinion on this, even though the rules as written (and basic human decency) seem to make this decision easy enough.

2043: 1519: 721: 323: 4707: 4065: 2723: 2705: 2622: 2335:

I think I didn't save it last time. I was afraid "publish" meant a finished product but now I've "published" the draft:

1982: 1675: 289: 216: 4196:

In all this, I still see no compelling policy reason not to use Hayes' most recent self-identification, except that it

4082:

Forgive me, but I am a lot older than most people here, so my perspective is rooted in being queer in a different time.

3220:. She was quite active in the French nightlife scene in the 1970s and 1980s. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, 3571: 3180: 3136: 3114: 783: 3094:

I have noticed a couple of recent arrivals of new accounts engaging in edits on gender identity-related pages from a

136:

is referred to as the "Mother of Pride" in multiple articles, but the term was removed from the biography article by

5113: 5092: 5064: 5047: 4991: 4951: 4855: 4806: 4773: 4494: 3371: 3350: 3184: 2637: 2590: 2017: 1493: 111: 38: 4958:

page. It would be better to do this sooner, rather than later, I'd say, to get the near year off to a good start.

4038: 1550: 1444: 1347: 756: 729: 684: 437: 5120: 5099: 5071: 5012: 4998: 4967: 4936: 4913: 4870: 4836: 4813: 4785: 4762: 4733: 4719: 4687: 4647: 4614: 4587: 4567: 4551: 4509: 4472: 4446: 4412: 4396: 4365: 4342: 4312: 4274: 4237: 4191: 4073: 4055: 4030: 4014: 3999: 3945: 3923: 3898: 3880: 3857: 3833: 3788: 3769: 3746: 3721: 3690: 3660: 3600: 3575: 3552: 3525: 3491: 3468: 3442: 3412: 3378: 3357: 3327: 3307: 3284: 3253: 3229: 3206: 3108: 3075: 3056: 3039: 3011: 2987: 2955: 2937: 2912: 2886: 2866: 2808: 2793: 2765: 2742: 2698: 2683: 2597: 2563: 2533: 2506: 2463: 2449: 2434: 2406: 2388: 2369: 2347: 2330: 2321:. Happy to help with those issues. Can you post the link to the draft? I don’t see it under your edit history. — 2312: 2294:· I’m not sure how or where I note that I do have a connection to the subject and a conflict of interest. 2277: 2259: 2234: 2213: 2187: 2164: 2110: 2077: 2051: 2024: 1990: 1967: 1949: 1902: 1873: 1859: 1832: 1813: 1789: 1700: 1682: 1656: 1635: 1605: 1584: 1554: 1527: 1500: 1469: 1448: 1420: 1398: 1334: 1303: 1283: 1274:. If you can find anything, particularly anything academic, then maybe it has a chance but I'm very doubtful. -- 1259: 1218: 1195: 1170: 1132: 1118: 1081: 1063: 1034: 1018: 984: 953: 935: 912: 891: 860: 787: 760: 733: 710: 688: 661: 632: 612: 571: 521: 494: 473: 441: 407: 401: 398: 395: 392: 360: 308: 265: 228: 206: 187: 168: 123: 4501: 4338: 3596: 2951: 2933: 2738: 2671: 2502: 2201: 2039: 1515: 897: 748: 701:

concerning a new article contains argumentation that might be of interest to those interested in LGBT studies.

600: 404: 344: 2789: 4759: 4654: 2486: 2459: 2430: 1974: 1688: 1665: 1166: 775: 620: 579: 426: 3400:( i would be in favour of if you want to help on LGBT articles go here, but I think I am in the minority)( 1725:

So I'm here to ask a favour. Or, well, two, having just seen a BLP noticeboard discussion mentioned above.

1228:

I'd like to get some feedback on this. If it's problematic or otherwise not noteworthy, I won't pursue it.

347:

and ought to be deleted or merged into that article. At the very least it needs a lot of work to restore a

5008: 4963: 4679: 4635: 4625: 4583: 4547: 4408: 4306: 4270: 4229: 4185: 4008: 3829: 3821: 3652: 3583: 3567: 3543:), discussing when and how to tag articles as in scope for WP:LGBT. Input from other editors is welcome.-- 3540: 3521: 3464: 3321: 3280: 3249: 3104: 2907: 2861: 2105: 1730: 1715: 1626: 1612: 779: 706: 628: 608: 566: 4954:

for 2022 done with a green check. I'm not as skilled and am afraid I might mess something up if I create

3607: 1385:. But if it's correlated with other conspiracies like QAnon then it possibly could be mentioned there. — 679:

page). As this discussion is of importance to this Wikiproject, I thought I'd leave a notification here.

5106: 5085: 5057: 5040: 4984: 4843: 4799: 4358: 3941: 3894: 3853: 3674: 3625: 3364: 3343: 2583: 2010: 1920: 1898: 1869: 1809: 1697: 1653: 1486: 1279: 949: 931: 887: 871: 856: 771: 597: 356: 331: 4467: 4795: 4348: 3937: 3904: 3890: 3864: 3849: 3144:

While there is a tenuous claim of significance (and so fails speedy), there is no claim of notability.

1094: 1090: 990: 960: 945: 927: 883: 4832: 4715: 4671: 4610: 4563: 4173:

our readers in general and second of all within queer communities. Deep breaths all round, basically.

4049: 3758:

there must be a verified consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate.

3536: 3303: 3167: 3044: 2995: 2893: 2694: 2157: 1580: 1574: 1546: 1440: 1325:

Finally, is there an extant list of LGBTQ press that are considered reliable sources by the project?

752: 725: 680: 433: 285: 119: 4042:. Luckily, in this case, we have much clearer sources on the subject actually being a trans woman. ~ 548:

general reference info on LGBT+ topics, what should they prioritize? See the list in development at

4824: 4334: 3844: 3765: 3711: 3697: 3686: 3647:

is fine, whereas it would obviously be unacceptable if it redirected to an article about gay men. –

3217: 3196: 3071: 3052: 3007: 2983: 2947: 2929: 2734: 2675: 2498: 2365: 2073: 1964: 1887: 1465: 1368: 1206: 1191: 1150: 1106: 1051: 980: 941: 923: 879: 716:

RfC on the "Implications for polygamy legalization" section of the Respect for Marriage Act article

501: 202: 164: 137: 5039:

has been nominated for deletion. Article improvements and/or discussion participation welcome. ---

4534:

and pretty shortly after asking someone came and removed the footnote for the notability reason.)

4458: 3363:

I've nominated the article for Good status if any project members are interested in reviewing. ---

586:

Hope it is okay to ask here, was not sure where to post. I stumbled on what seemed a strange edit

140:

in August 2021 based on claims of citogenesis. That removal was objected to in June this year (by

4909: 4755: 4741: 4643: 4438: 4386: 3868: 3718: 3487: 3408: 3203: 3028: 2679: 2455: 2445: 2426: 2402: 2343: 2308: 2230: 2183: 1933: 1764: 1601: 1341: 1326: 1251: 1162: 656: 483: 457: 304: 141: 3616:

has no apparent benefit to the encyclopedia. A redirect being "offensive or abusive" is a valid

2611: 1265:

I've seen people laughing at them on Twitter. At one point one of them was trying to claim that

1232: 1205:

There is currently an RFC on whether Holly Woodlawn's deadname should be used in her article at

530:

Help requested for Wiki99 concept - I have been developing a concept of subject matter specific

4515:

Any good way to prevent reverts of GENDERID changes on person who is not independently notable?

3981:

clearly and unambiguously communicated gender identity does not require "consensus". I believe

770:

Hello, I was wondering if this WikiProject has a working list (or a to-do list)? I came across

5004: 4974: 4959: 4932: 4781: 4675: 4579: 4543: 4404: 4266: 4225: 3825: 3817: 3784: 3742: 3648: 3548: 3518: 3460: 3438: 3276: 3245: 3225: 3163: 3100: 2900: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2854: 2848: 2835: 2761: 2558: 2529: 2379: 2255: 2209: 2098: 1945: 1785: 1630: 702: 559: 517: 421:

page is functionally identical, albeit much less visible, version of the importance scale.

340: 250: 2097:

Sign support if you like. Comments and questions are welcome on the talk page here or there.

1823:

attested to anywhere? They're not in the copy I could find of the (very weird) McElroy book.

1747:

I would like to request that if anyone has some time, if they could check my sums are correct

544: 505: 4558:-- that should slow down the well-intentioned (although not stop any deliberate efforts.) -- 4393: 4254:

good faith, and will happily misuse any information that could lead towards their end goals.

3919: 3876: 3339: 3095: 2804: 2573: 2326: 2273: 1894: 1880: 1865: 1852: 1840: 1805: 1692: 1648: 1641: 1511: 1436: 1416: 1391: 1330: 1299: 1275: 1255: 1128: 1077: 1030: 1014: 1006: 908: 852: 466: 352: 242: 224: 183: 4828: 4727: 4711: 4606: 4559: 4043: 3976:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cheshire_home_invasion_murders&oldid=1122392863

3503: 3314: 3299: 3132: 3118: 2690: 2145: 2065: 1767:- a prominent gay lifestyle website that doesn't out people, with the article even saying 1569: 1378: 1240: 1214: 1183: 875: 695: 152: 115: 4950:

is done, as its now Jan. 1 in 2023, although its still 2022 here, so I'd say we can mark

2395:

Dear Kbabej, I wondered if you have any suggestions now that the draft is posted? Thanks!

745:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Epiphyllumlover additions of polygamist information

1773:

sure there were sources for everyone listed, and didn't take tabloids as sources, so it

277: 253: 4661: 4250: 3982: 3933: 3908: 3761: 3754: 3682: 3644: 3479: 3449: 3390: 3295: 3067: 3048: 3003: 2999: 2979: 2383: 2361: 2069: 1828: 1760: 1745:. Given the larger numbers (up to hundreds) and overlapping datasets involved, though, 1743:

provided there is consensus among editors that the result of the calculation is correct

1738: 1595:

Talk:LGBT grooming conspiracy theory/Archive 1#Potentially moving the title of the page

1481: 1461: 1266: 1187: 1098: 1069: 1043: 976: 968: 549: 348: 261: 212: 198: 175: 160: 3760:

I am not seeing a consensus here, off-hand; without it we must remove the categories.

1356:

QAnon ... is an American political conspiracy theory ... QAnon centers on false claims

4905: 4639: 4522: 4378: 4372: 4220:. To diverge from this requires an RfC-level consensus, or a damn good justification. 4217: 3805: 3798: 3715: 3636: 3617: 3507: 3483: 3404: 3394: 3200: 3150: 3087: 2975: 2963: 2709: 2647: 2555:

Talk:Dissent from Catholic teaching on homosexuality#Requested move 17 September 2022

2541:

Talk:Dissent from Catholic teaching on homosexuality#Requested move 17 September 2022

2517: 2490: 2479: 2441: 2422: 2398: 2375: 2353: 2339: 2318: 2304: 2265: 2241: 2226: 2195: 2179: 2140: 2120: 1597: 1568:. Would be good to get the involvement of some members of this WikiProject about it. 994: 972: 964: 805: 720:

There is currently an RfC on the "Implications for polygamy legalization" section at

651: 590: 385: 300: 133: 4706:

and verify that it is, as I believe, someone falsely claiming that a study from the

4243:

The alternative is to hand straight people (no offence, allies) an instant victory:

5081: 4928: 4777: 4354:

Surprised to see no article on this given the World Cup controversy. Article there

4300: 4296: 4292: 4258: 4205: 4061: 3963: 3780: 3738: 3562:

Hello everyone. Recently, while browsing Knowledge, I have found redirects titled "

3544: 3434: 3397:(C class), LGBT (B class) as an indirect advertisement of the LGBT+ WP community? 3221: 3031: 3024: 2820: 2757: 2525: 2251: 2205: 1941: 1801: 1781: 1290: 1271: 539: 513: 486: 297: 145: 3757: 5084:

has been nominated for deletion, if any project members want to take a look. ---

5036: 4862: 4497:

people, so I thought it was noteworthy to create a separate page for the aces.

4213: 3929: 3915: 3886: 3872: 3149:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

2800: 2357: 2322: 2269: 1940:

Both of these could use additional participation, so that they could be closed.

1934:

Merging the "Instances" section of Transmisogyny into Trans woman#Discrimination

1847: 1756: 1538: 1412: 1404: 1386: 1382: 1295: 1124: 1086: 1073: 1026: 1010: 1002: 904: 676: 461: 220: 193: 179: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3482:" to "Chest binding." I am curious to see what people think about changing it. 2842:

Also apparently Jimbo Wales expresses that the organization is not transphobic.

2336: 675:

regarding LGBTQ+ image galleries (prompted by a particular edit of mine on the

2494: 2058: 1960: 1566:

Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Tobin Heath/Christen Press

1210: 1177: 643: 246: 4825:

Talk:Alexei_Yagudin#December_2020_RfC_-_inclusion_of_2020_controversy_in_lead

4064:

seems to pretty clearly apply, and nobody seems to have suggested otherwise.

971:

of homophobia, after they've explained quite clearly that the subject failed

3621: 3563: 1824: 351:. Do other people here agree, and if so does anyone want to help with this? 257: 4216:) that a cis reader's momentary discomfort or confusion does not supersede 1288:

I can only find one source online that would be appropriate, which is from

926:

please see if you can contribute to this topic and help for its approval.

4698:

I'm really trying to avoid editing articles. Could someone take a look at

4245:

look at this trans criminal who committed a trans crime whilst being trans

4152:

look at this trans criminal who committed a trans crime whilst being trans

3173:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

2777: 2297:

Thanks for help with those and any other advice you can offer to a novice!

743:

There is currently a discussion which you might want to participate in at

2752:

I would be grateful for views from editors on this request for comment: "

2475: 2200:

Provided you don't have a connection to the subject, start writing it at

2134: 2116: 4747: 4435:

Talk:Colorado Springs nightclub shooting#Requested move 20 November 2022

4426: 4421:

Talk:Colorado Springs nightclub shooting#Requested move 20 November 2022

3703: 3403:

Also do you think the classes on the above three articles look too low?

2836:

Talk:LGB_Alliance#First_sentence:_opposed_to_transgender_rights_movement

2626:, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the 2546: 1618: 4758:

that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran

4666:

Knowledge talk:Featured article review/Natalie Clifford Barney/archive1

2876:: please try to use a more neutral call for comments. Consider reading 1936:

hasn't had any participation beyond the original proposal last October.

4798:

has been nominated for deletion. Discussion participation welcome. ---

2497:

in the lead as it's been a repeated source of contention in the page.

1314:

We don't want to give them the attention that they so obviously crave.

3457:

whether to mention Trans pregnancy in the lead section of the article

1154: 256:. No opinion on the redirect, but probably should be in the article. 4383:

controversial protest at Vermont pride, and was physically assaulted

3932:, I've passed on the request to the Teahouse, thank you for sending 2493:

and asking for people to discuss whether we should describe them as

3385:

Do some LGBT articles on Main need a disambiguation pointing here?

1231:

There's a bizarre group of conspiracy theorists derisively called "

157:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 17#Mother of Pride

3640: 3455:

There is currently a rather raucous discussion taking place about

2799:

Is there a reason you keep editing from different IP addresses? --

1351: 1247:

exploring the landscape of these particular conspiracy theorists.

1158: 2603:

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

1360:

Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election

5003:

Great! I'll add in some pages I've already worked on this year.

3456: 2780:. The edits happened in February, the last one with the comment 2485:

A while ago I started a thread on the Genspect talk page titled

2382:

is a great guide to the Visual Editor (e.g., adding citations).

1930:

seems to have a rough consensus, but with only two participants.

1719:. I hope to now also add substantial info to, and clean-up, the 1364:

After Joe Biden won the 2020 United States presidential election

3002:

since the article still refers to Jenner as "Bruce Jenner". --

538:

for context) and calling it "Wiki99", for 99 important topics.

25: 4331:

Talk:Sex reassignment surgery#Requested move 23 November 2022

2454:

Ok, I'll make a few changes for formatting and citations. --

1564:

There's an LGBT-related BLP question at the BLP noticeboard:

1479:

New bio for gay make-up artist, influencer, and entrepreneur

1407:'s thoughts. A list of commonly-used sources is available at 1145:

The first transgender broadcast journalist from Kerala, India

975:, the article was deleted, and the situation hasn't changed? 460:

if the bot is not actually widely used to improve content. —

4746: 4425: 3702: 3123: 2610: 2545: 1617: 2602: 1864:

Yes, I extended from the one I did find. I'll remove them.

1777:

be fine, but it's obviously a subject to tread the line on.

4437:

that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —

3235:

Question regarding standard treatment for gender dysphoria

2489:

but it faltered, so I'm opening it up the community as an

2030:

Have federal LGBT protections been nullified by Texas law?

504:, such as by allowing them to be sorted to the top of the 391:

Here are some prior discussions I've read about the idea:

3871:, a place for new WP editors to ask questions. Cheers. -- 3273:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Biography#Neopronouns RfC

2250:

system, declaring the COI when you submit it for review.

648:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Sally Ride/archive1

322:

page has been a real bugbear to me. To quote myself from

3714:

that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.

3478:

I started a discussion proposing changing the title of "

3342:

ahead of a possible Good article nomination. Thanks! ---

2557:

that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.

1629:

that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.

1366:(presupposing that Trump and supporters were wrong). In 1224:

Potential Article: "Transvestigator" Conspiracy Theories

4699: 4382: 3975: 3797:

UK coverage of transgender issues up for discussion at

3191:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3021:

Athletics at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Men's decathlon

2521: 594: 587: 3936:, I'll go through it and make changes in the draft. 3156:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

3023:

have already been updated as per community consensus.

2246:

In that case you can still create a draft through the

1590:

LGBT grooming conspiracy theory potential title change

4927:

that may be of interest to editors in this project.--

4500:

I would love y'alls' help in expanding this article.

1928:

Merging Gay bashing into Violence against LGBT people

1435:

As much as I will be looking forward to it soon, the

722:

Talk:Respect for Marriage Act#RfC concerning polygamy

623:, but I'm not sure if that is the right place, even. 4856:

Talk:Transgender sexuality § An eye toward a rewrite

4827:

that may be of interest to editors in this project.

4021:

because they might have committed a horrible crime.

3681:? Many thanks (will cross-post to Women in Red too) 2754:

Listing of wrestlers who self identify as non-binary

1752:

interested, I'd encourage this to be discussed anew.

1627:

Talk:Gold star (slang)#Requested move 10 August 2022

1613:

Talk:Gold star (slang)#Requested move 10 August 2022

4487:

List of asexual, grey sexual, and demisexual people

4478:

List of asexual, grey sexual, and demisexual people

2849:

Talk:LGB_Alliance#A_classic_problem_with_categories

3712:Talk:Breast binding#Requested move 2 November 2022 3698:Talk:Breast binding#Requested move 2 November 2022 2831:For now comment requested with the first sentence 2337:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Tom_Wilson_Weinberg 1878:(Just to be clear, the transgender lesbian symbol 1153:, the first transgender broadcast journalist from 272:Proposal regarding article on transgender genocide 215:I've gone ahead and split the article, so now the 4756:Talk:Trans bashing#Requested move 9 December 2022 4742:Talk:Trans bashing#Requested move 9 December 2022 3620:(specifically #3). For this reason, the redirect 3047:, however, still refers to Jenner as "Bruce". -- 2092:meta:Wikimedia LGBT+/conversation series proposal 1381:in any article where the subject is factual e.g. 1237:belief that Michelle Obama is a transgender woman 828:Help (or advice) wanted on contentious LGBT edits 482:. Anything else is a high-to-low priority topic. 4603:Newname (then performing under the name Oldname) 4532:I asked here about whether I'd done things right 4202:it does not match what is most common in sources 3779:may be a source in French which says different. 3632:) a day after Artemis left his original comment. 2976:WP:THQ § Legal name change and updating deadname 2964:WP:THQ § Legal name change and updating deadname 2578:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Napoleon Jinnies 1372:, we say that "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" is 314:Fix or delete the Feminine Essence Concept page? 2170:Advice on creating a page for an LGBTQ musician 2036:Talk:LGBT rights in Texas/Archive 2#Fresh start 1721:LGBT issues at the Olympic and Paralympic Games 1311: 739:Respect for Marriage Act, polygamy, & WP:AN 328: 4925:Talk:Abigail Kinoiki Kekaulike Kawānanakoa#RFC 4772:I recently created a draft for trans activist 2778:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Max_(given_name) 2064:Of potential interest to this WikiProject: An 480:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies/Core topics 366:Including importance in the wikiproject banner 3313:I’m not convinced that she’s much beyond the 778:and I did not see any Knowledge article yet. 667:Notification re: trans/LGBTQ+ image galleries 110:I made significant changes to the article on 8: 832:...even if it's just to tell me I'm wrong. 151:I'm aware of this only because the redirect 4904:in articles related to LGBT rights topics. 2998:and see whether any updates are needed for 866:Three pages that would benefit from a watch 4854:You are invited to join the discussion at 4669: 4578:they're being deliberate" though. :-/ ) - 3804:An editor has made three rapid filings at 3271:You are invited to join the discussion at 3241:Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine 2974:You are invited to join the discussion at 2360:and/or others can help you out with that. 1025:Note: The editor has blanked the draft. -- 320:feminine essence concept of transsexuality 4303:is written down. Ah well. As you were. — 4130:The other reason this is an edge case is 3808:on the coverage of transgender issues by 3558:Problem with offensive slurs as redirects 2204:and I'm sure people will check in on it. 4754:There is a requested move discussion at 4433:There is a requested move discussion at 4036:remotely similar case I can think of is 3710:There is a requested move discussion at 3261:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Biography 2553:There is a requested move discussion at 2516:Hello, could we please get some eyes on 1625:There is a requested move discussion at 1512:Talk:Trans woman § RfC on first sentence 4304: 4183: 4023:2A02:8108:2C3F:AC2C:3DC9:45F9:9852:2083 4006: 3673:Hello all, I've started a page for the 3535:I've created a new project sub-page at 3319: 3162:notice, but please explain why in your 2006:Cherry Valentine: Gypsy Queen and Proud 1998:Cherry Valentine: Gypsy Queen and Proud 1207:Talk:Holly_Woodlawn#Request_for_comment 1186:(a trans BLP) could use more eyeballs. 797: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 4710:is an NIH study, and undo it if so? -- 4242: 4201: 4197: 4060:I don't see how this is an edge case: 3992:2A02:8108:2C3F:AC2C:B9FD:F9D:DB4E:720D 3497:Question maybe looking for a consensus 3338:Project members are invited to review 2844:See also the comments of Jimbo Wales. 1768: 1742: 1729:First, some introductory prose at the 1560:Relevant thread at the BLP noticeboard 1373: 1363: 1355: 671:I have opened up a discussion over at 239:The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4919:Abigail Kinoiki Kekaulike Kawānanakoa 3017:Athletics at the 1976 Summer Olympics 673:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Images 155:has been nominated for deletion (see 7: 1506:RfC on first sentence of Trans woman 536:Knowledge:WikiProject Vital Articles 106:Reggie Williams article reassessment 4530:that is. (There was initially, but 4329:Any input would be appreciated at: 3972:Talk:Cheshire home invasion murders 3727:Josephine Baker LGBT Category Tags? 3212:Maud Molyneux, trans French actress 2083:Funded conversation series proposal 2038:to break something of a stalemate. 1973:Someone marked it as C-class now. 1821:File:Transgender lesbian symbol.svg 837:LGBT rights in United Arab Emirates 4888:Your feedback would be welcome at 3151:deleted for any of several reasons 3139:because of the following concern: 2378:, if you haven’t seen it already, 1149:Hello, I've created a draft about 447:I don't oppose the addition of an 384:field, even if it is not used for 24: 4942:Starting "Wiki Loves Pride 2023"? 4896:, regarding the use of the terms 4776:. Any help would be appreciated. 3816:. Additional input is requested. 3474:Discussion at Breast_binding:Talk 3298:should have a Knowledge article? 2827:This is a transphobic hate group. 2066:RfC on including an external link 1510:Comments would be appreciated at 918:Draft submission for a queer poet 5026: 4849: 4653:Featured Article Save Award for 4295:trumps everything else, because 3266: 2969: 2921:Health Liberation Now listed at 2715: 2126: 1879: 1735:Template:LGBT Olympians overview 903:Your input is appreciated here. 747:, which especially concerns the 532:Knowledge:Vital articles/Level/2 432:Thank you for any input on this 276: 29: 4980:Knowledge:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 4977:Happy to get the ball rolling: 4956:Knowledge:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 4948:Knowledge:Wiki Loves Pride/2022 4704:ego-dystonic sexual orientation 4694:ego-dystonic sexual orientation 4247:and other such JKRish nonsense. 3907:. I would recommend you review 3843:Hi, I've revised this page for 3045:1976 Summer Olympics#Highlights 1459:Talk:Sex and gender distinction 1093:wasn't associated with those. 478:There is already a page called 219:has its own article. Cheers! -- 4218:our duties toward BLP subjects 4140:are doing to trans people now. 3968:Cheshire home invasion murders 3635:We do have various legitimate 3358:19:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 2938:16:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC) 2743:20:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC) 2598:01:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC) 2564:18:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 2534:05:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 2507:02:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2034:Input would be appreciated at 751:and articles relating to it.-- 330:part of a myth perpetuated by 1: 4937:18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC) 4914:23:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4871:04:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4837:02:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC) 4814:19:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 4786:16:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 4768:Henry Berg-Brousseau has died 4763:15:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC) 4734:01:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC) 4720:00:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC) 4447:19:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC) 4413:19:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC) 4397:19:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC) 4366:17:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC) 4343:08:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 4313:22:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC) 4275:21:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC) 4238:21:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC) 4192:20:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC) 4074:16:30, 17 November 2022 (UTC) 4056:14:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC) 4031:20:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC) 4015:14:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC) 4000:11:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC) 3958:Misgendering of living person 3946:17:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 3924:17:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 3899:17:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 3881:17:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 3858:12:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 3834:19:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC) 3789:01:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC) 3722:12:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC) 2464:06:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 2450:12:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 2435:02:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 2407:14:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC) 2389:23:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2370:22:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2348:19:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2331:17:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2313:16:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2278:16:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC) 2260:16:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC) 2165:03:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC) 2111:11:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 2078:05:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2052:03:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 2025:17:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC) 5121:14:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 5100:02:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 4708:Catholic Medical Association 4648:20:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC) 4615:22:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 4588:17:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC) 4568:17:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC) 4552:17:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC) 4510:19:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC) 4473:14:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC) 3848:to give it another review. 3770:05:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 3747:05:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 3691:07:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC) 3661:04:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC) 3601:03:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC) 3553:15:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC) 3526:16:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC) 3492:12:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC) 3469:18:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC) 3443:12:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC) 3413:07:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC) 3379:14:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC) 3328:21:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC) 3308:05:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC) 3285:22:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3254:14:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC) 3230:02:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC) 2923:Reliable Sources Noticeboard 2724:Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria 2706:Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria 2699:18:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 2684:15:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 2623:Islamic sexual jurisprudence 1733:, and the whole template at 1161:. kindly help me to expand? 851:case. Thanks and good luck. 848:now that I have been accused 386:biographies of living people 290:Violence against LGBT people 284:a proposal to merge the new 217:Brenda Howard Memorial Award 5072:17:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 5054:14:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 5013:05:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 4999:02:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 4968:02:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 4662:Featured Article Save Award 4214:RfCs spanning three decades 3576:21:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 3207:01:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC) 3195:allows discussion to reach 3176:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3159:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3109:00:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC) 3076:02:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 3061:Some further digging found 3057:01:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 3040:01:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 3012:01:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 2988:01:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 2956:04:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC) 2913:13:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC) 2899:Thanks for calling me out. 2887:16:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC) 2867:12:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC) 2809:23:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC) 2794:17:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC) 2766:21:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC) 2655:00:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC) 2235:19:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC) 2214:21:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2188:20:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2068:to the Kiwi Farms website. 2009:. Improvements welcome! --- 1991:06:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC) 1968:23:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC) 1950:13:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC) 1903:19:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 1874:09:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC) 1860:09:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC) 1833:07:54, 26 August 2022 (UTC) 1814:03:51, 26 August 2022 (UTC) 1790:14:14, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 1701:18:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC) 1683:17:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC) 1657:17:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC) 1636:16:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC) 1606:19:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 1585:15:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 1555:15:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1528:14:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1501:19:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1485:. Improvements welcome! --- 1470:03:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1449:21:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 1421:21:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 1399:20:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 1335:03:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 1304:20:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 1284:20:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 1260:19:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 1219:15:41, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 1196:20:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 1171:04:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC) 5137: 5024: 4952:Knowledge:Wiki Loves Pride 4542:sorts of edits? Thanks. - 3590:Knowledge is not censored. 3290:What about Dylan Mulvaney? 3187:exist. In particular, the 1955:Reassessment of Pride flag 1755:Second, the list includes 1133:23:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 1119:23:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 1082:23:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 1064:23:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 1035:22:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 1019:00:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 985:22:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 954:22:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 936:22:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 913:22:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 892:18:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC) 861:16:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC) 788:18:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC) 4688:22:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 4039:Pictures for Sad Children 3181:proposed deletion process 3027:deals with this already. 2674:be added to the project? 2657:on behalf of the AFI team 2636:to appear on Knowledge's 2202:Draft:Tom Wilson Weinberg 1802:LGBT symbols#Simple_icons 1647:Should we use he or she? 1176:Controversies section on 761:20:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 734:17:13, 25 July 2022 (UTC) 711:13:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC) 689:21:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 662:08:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 633:03:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 613:07:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 572:20:37, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 522:19:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 495:17:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 474:12:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 442:11:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 361:16:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 309:16:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 266:04:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 247:10.1177/26318318211038118 229:15:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 207:09:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 188:04:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 169:09:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC) 124:05:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC) 5105:The article was kept --- 3810:The Times, The Telegraph 3675:Death of Pratima Goankar 3669:Death of Pratima Goankar 3618:criteria for deleting it 3063:this September 2015 edit 2672:2022 Bratislava shooting 2629:Articles for improvement 2248:WP:Articles for creation 1795:More transgender symbols 1431:Manchester Pride article 1184:Discussion on Eli Erlick 898:Talk:Henry Davis Sleeper 749:Respect for Marriage Act 603:. If good, I apologize. 601:LGBT rights in Hong Kong 375:WikiProject LGBT studies 345:causes of transsexuality 339:IMO the whole page is a 4884:in LGBT rights articles 4655:Natalie Clifford Barney 4371:Could use more eyes on 4291:I get it, I really do. 4066:Caeciliusinhorto-public 3168:the article's talk page 776:GLBT Historical Society 621:LGBT rights in Mongolia 580:LGBT rights in Maldives 578:Advice for new editor: 4751: 4636:Draft:Darwin Del Fabro 4626:Draft:Darwin Del Fabro 4430: 4198:may come as a surprise 3707: 3216:I created a draft for 3147: 3128: 2615: 2550: 1919:I have been reviewing 1731:List of LGBT Olympians 1716:List of LGBT Olympians 1622: 1317: 337: 144:, but a third editor ( 4983:. Happy New Year! --- 4844:Transgender sexuality 4750: 4725:Reverted, thank you. 4429: 3706: 3626:Transgender sexuality 3193:articles for deletion 3141: 3137:proposed for deletion 3127: 2614: 2549: 1621: 1201:RFC on Holly Woodlawn 872:John Hays Hammond Jr. 598:LGBT rights in Bhutan 318:For a long time, the 42:of past discussions. 4774:Henry Berg-Brousseau 4200:to readers, or that 3637:articles about slurs 3628:was speedy-deleted ( 2996:1976 Summer Olympics 2666:New project article? 2487:Anti-Trans revisited 1709:LGBT+ Olympians list 1362:, we start off with 694:AfD for new article 545:meta:Wikimedia LGBT+ 335:defend their theory. 332:Blanchard and Bailey 286:Transgender genocide 4923:There is an RfC at 4842:Looking to rewrite 4823:There is an RfC at 4634:I recently created 4502:Significa liberdade 4485:I recently created 4226:RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ 3845:Draft:Aditya Tiwari 3649:RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ 2748:Request for comment 2480:Request for comment 2040:Firefangledfeathers 1533:Ty Mitchell article 1516:Firefangledfeathers 1369:Irreversible Damage 965:personally accusing 942:Draft:Aditya Tiwari 924:Draft:Aditya Tiwari 880:Henry Davis Sleeper 458:diminishing returns 4752: 4740:Requested move at 4431: 4419:Requested move at 4390: 4335:WanderingWanda🐮👑 3708: 3696:Requested move at 3294:Does anyone think 3185:deletion processes 3129: 2948:TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ 2930:TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ 2735:TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ 2616: 2551: 2539:Requested move at 2499:TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ 1689:Maddy from Celeste 1623: 1611:Requested move at 1454:Splitting proposal 1103: 1048: 806:"Bois Burk papers" 772:Bois Frederic Burk 427:CleanupWorklistBot 4690: 4674:comment added by 4388: 4261:. In particular, 3839:Review of a draft 3679:paywalled in here 3584:Artemis Andromeda 3568:Artemis Andromeda 3115:Proposed deletion 2885: 2663: 2662: 2632:. The article is 2620:Please note that 2380:Help:Introduction 1986: 1819:Are symbols like 1099: 1044: 780:PigeonChickenFish 550:meta:Wiki99/LGBT+ 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5128: 5116: 5109: 5108:Another Believer 5095: 5088: 5087:Another Believer 5067: 5060: 5059:Another Believer 5050: 5043: 5042:Another Believer 5030: 5029: 4994: 4987: 4986:Another Believer 4869: 4867: 4865: 4853: 4852: 4809: 4802: 4801:Another Believer 4796:Konrad Juengling 4791:Konrad Juengling 4732: 4470: 4463: 4452:WikiProject Drag 4444: 4441: 4391: 4363: 4349:One Love armband 4311: 4190: 4052: 4046: 4045:Maplestrip/Mable 4013: 3759: 3611: 3587: 3539:(linked to from 3516: 3374: 3367: 3366:Another Believer 3353: 3346: 3345:Another Believer 3340:Cherry Valentine 3334:Cherry Valentine 3326: 3270: 3269: 3178: 3177: 3161: 3160: 3126: 3037: 3034: 2973: 2972: 2910: 2905: 2897: 2884: 2864: 2859: 2771:Max (given name) 2719: 2718: 2653: 2650: 2638:Community portal 2607: 2606: 2593: 2586: 2585:Another Believer 2574:Napoleon Jinnies 2569:Napoleon Jinnies 2561: 2522:template cleanup 2386: 2245: 2199: 2178:Thank you, John 2162: 2155: 2154: 2130: 2129: 2108: 2103: 2020: 2013: 2012:Another Believer 1987: 1984: 1978: 1891: 1883: 1855: 1844: 1695: 1681: 1678: 1670: 1651: 1642:Rodrigo Lehtinen 1633: 1496: 1489: 1488:Another Believer 1437:Manchester Pride 1394: 1345: 1272:reliable sources 1233:Transvestigators 1115: 1109: 1102: 1060: 1054: 1047: 876:A. Piatt Andrew 820: 819: 817: 816: 802: 659: 654: 569: 564: 492: 489: 469: 450: 383: 379: 373: 324:a past talk page 292:has been opened 280: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5136: 5135: 5131: 5130: 5129: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5119: 5114: 5107: 5098: 5093: 5086: 5079: 5070: 5065: 5058: 5056:Never mind! --- 5053: 5048: 5041: 5033: 5032: 5027: 5023: 4997: 4992: 4985: 4944: 4921: 4894:WikiProject Law 4890:this discussion 4886: 4863: 4860: 4859: 4850: 4847: 4821: 4812: 4807: 4800: 4793: 4770: 4745: 4726: 4696: 4658: 4629: 4517: 4480: 4466: 4459: 4454: 4442: 4439: 4424: 4387: 4376: 4359: 4352: 4327: 4325:Move discussion 4209:very explicitly 4050: 4044: 3960: 3841: 3802: 3729: 3701: 3671: 3605: 3581: 3560: 3541:WP:LGBT/Editing 3533: 3512: 3504:Aaron Hernandez 3499: 3476: 3453: 3387: 3377: 3372: 3365: 3356: 3351: 3344: 3336: 3292: 3267: 3264: 3237: 3214: 3189:speedy deletion 3175: 3174: 3158: 3157: 3133:Alice Di Micele 3124: 3122: 3119:Alice Di Micele 3092: 3035: 3032: 2970: 2967: 2926: 2908: 2901: 2894:Isabelle Belato 2891: 2880:for some tips. 2862: 2855: 2817: 2773: 2750: 2730:discussion page 2720: 2716: 2713: 2668: 2658: 2648: 2644: 2605: 2596: 2591: 2584: 2571: 2559: 2544: 2514: 2483: 2384: 2239: 2193: 2172: 2158: 2150: 2146: 2144:. Thank you. –– 2141:discussion page 2131: 2127: 2124: 2106: 2099: 2085: 2062: 2032: 2023: 2018: 2011: 2001: 1983: 1976: 1957: 1917: 1915:Merge proposals 1885: 1853: 1838: 1797: 1711: 1693: 1676: 1672:♥︎(they/she)♥︎ 1666: 1663: 1649: 1645: 1631: 1616: 1592: 1562: 1547:QueenofBithynia 1535: 1508: 1499: 1494: 1487: 1477: 1456: 1441:QueenofBithynia 1433: 1392: 1348:fringe theories 1339: 1243:recently did a 1241:QAnon Anonymous 1226: 1203: 1181: 1147: 1113: 1107: 1100: 1058: 1052: 1045: 920: 901: 868: 830: 825: 824: 823: 814: 812: 804: 803: 799: 768: 753:Epiphyllumlover 741: 726:Epiphyllumlover 718: 699: 696:Female (gender) 681:QueenofBithynia 669: 657: 652: 640: 584: 567: 560: 490: 487: 467: 448: 434:Darcyisverycute 381: 377: 371: 368: 316: 274: 153:Mother of Pride 131: 129:Mother of Pride 112:Reggie Williams 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5134: 5132: 5124: 5123: 5111: 5090: 5078: 5075: 5062: 5045: 5025: 5022: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5015: 4989: 4946:It looks like 4943: 4940: 4920: 4917: 4902:decriminalized 4885: 4882:decriminalized 4874: 4846: 4840: 4820: 4817: 4804: 4792: 4789: 4769: 4766: 4744: 4738: 4737: 4736: 4695: 4692: 4664:nomination at 4657: 4651: 4628: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4516: 4513: 4479: 4476: 4453: 4450: 4423: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4375: 4369: 4351: 4346: 4326: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4255: 4251:Graham Linehan 4240: 4221: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4077: 4076: 4058: 4033: 3959: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3912: 3840: 3837: 3801: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3773: 3772: 3735: 3728: 3725: 3700: 3694: 3670: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3645:Faggot (slang) 3633: 3608:154.20.213.253 3593:154.20.213.253 3559: 3556: 3532: 3529: 3498: 3495: 3480:Breast binding 3475: 3472: 3452: 3450:Talk:Pregnancy 3447: 3446: 3445: 3391:LGBT community 3386: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3369: 3348: 3335: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3296:Dylan Mulvaney 3291: 3288: 3263: 3259:Discussion at 3257: 3236: 3233: 3213: 3210: 3199:for deletion. 3179:will stop the 3121: 3112: 3091: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3059: 3000:Caitlyn Jenner 2966: 2962:Discussion at 2960: 2959: 2958: 2925: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2852: 2851: 2839: 2838: 2824: 2823: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2786:89.247.174.158 2772: 2769: 2749: 2746: 2714: 2712: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2667: 2664: 2661: 2660: 2642: 2641: 2619: 2604: 2601: 2588: 2570: 2567: 2543: 2537: 2513: 2510: 2482: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2372: 2301: 2298: 2295: 2292: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2262: 2223: 2220: 2171: 2168: 2125: 2123: 2114: 2095: 2094: 2084: 2081: 2061: 2055: 2031: 2028: 2015: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1965:BappleBusiness 1956: 1953: 1938: 1937: 1931: 1921:WP:LGBT/Alerts 1916: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1888:Adarkhairedone 1796: 1793: 1779: 1778: 1761:Christen Press 1753: 1750: 1724: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1644: 1639: 1615: 1609: 1591: 1588: 1561: 1558: 1534: 1531: 1507: 1504: 1491: 1482:Patrick Starrr 1476: 1475:Patrick Starrr 1473: 1455: 1452: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1401: 1323: 1319: 1309: 1286: 1267:Marilyn Monroe 1225: 1222: 1202: 1199: 1180: 1174: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1038: 1037: 1022: 1021: 998: 987: 919: 916: 900: 895: 867: 864: 829: 826: 822: 821: 796: 795: 791: 767: 764: 740: 737: 717: 714: 698: 692: 668: 665: 646:up for FAC at 639: 636: 583: 576: 575: 574: 554: 553: 527: 526: 525: 524: 509: 476: 367: 364: 315: 312: 273: 270: 269: 268: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 130: 127: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5133: 5122: 5117: 5110: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5096: 5089: 5083: 5076: 5074: 5073: 5068: 5061: 5055: 5051: 5044: 5038: 5020: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4995: 4988: 4982: 4981: 4976: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4941: 4939: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4926: 4918: 4916: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4891: 4883: 4879: 4875: 4873: 4872: 4868:(she|they|xe) 4866: 4857: 4845: 4841: 4839: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4818: 4816: 4815: 4810: 4803: 4797: 4790: 4788: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4767: 4765: 4764: 4761: 4757: 4749: 4743: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4730: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4693: 4691: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4667: 4663: 4656: 4652: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4632: 4627: 4624: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4589: 4585: 4581: 4576: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4539: 4535: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4524: 4523:Signing Time! 4514: 4512: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4498: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4483: 4477: 4475: 4474: 4469: 4464: 4462: 4451: 4449: 4448: 4445: 4436: 4428: 4422: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4406: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4395: 4392: 4389:CorbieVreccan 4384: 4380: 4379:Fred Sargeant 4374: 4373:Fred Sargeant 4370: 4368: 4367: 4364: 4362: 4356: 4350: 4347: 4345: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4324: 4314: 4310: 4308: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4246: 4241: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4222: 4219: 4215: 4210: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4189: 4187: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4153: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4138: 4133: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4059: 4057: 4053: 4047: 4041: 4040: 4034: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4012: 4010: 4002: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3987: 3984: 3978: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3957: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3846: 3838: 3836: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3814:The Economist 3811: 3807: 3800: 3796: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3756: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3733: 3726: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3717: 3713: 3705: 3699: 3695: 3693: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3668: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3609: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3591: 3585: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3557: 3555: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3537:WP:LGBT/Scope 3531:WP:LGBT/Scope 3530: 3528: 3527: 3524: 3523: 3520: 3515: 3509: 3505: 3496: 3494: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3473: 3471: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3451: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3431: 3427: 3422: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3401: 3398: 3396: 3395:Queer studies 3393:(Start) and 3392: 3384: 3380: 3375: 3368: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3354: 3347: 3341: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3323: 3316: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3289: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3262: 3258: 3256: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3242: 3234: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3218:Maud Molyneux 3211: 3209: 3208: 3205: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3171: 3169: 3165: 3154: 3152: 3146: 3145: 3140: 3138: 3134: 3120: 3116: 3113: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3097: 3089: 3085: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3064: 3060: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2924: 2920: 2914: 2911: 2906: 2904: 2903:Bluerasberry 2895: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2865: 2860: 2858: 2857:Bluerasberry 2850: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2843: 2837: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2822: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2770: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2747: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2733:. Thank you. 2732: 2731: 2726: 2725: 2711: 2707: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2665: 2659: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2643:Delivered by 2639: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2625: 2624: 2613: 2609: 2608: 2600: 2599: 2594: 2587: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2568: 2566: 2565: 2562: 2556: 2548: 2542: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2518:Integrity USA 2512:Integrity USA 2511: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456:ArglebargleIV 2453: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2427:ArglebargleIV 2424: 2420: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2387: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2296: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2243: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2197: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2176: 2169: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2161: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2143: 2142: 2137: 2136: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2113: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2102: 2101:Bluerasberry 2093: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2082: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2060: 2056: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2029: 2027: 2026: 2021: 2014: 2008: 2007: 1999: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1980: 1979: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1966: 1962: 1954: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1935: 1932: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1922: 1914: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1889: 1882: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1849: 1842: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1794: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1776: 1771: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1708: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1671: 1669: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1652: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1637: 1634: 1628: 1620: 1614: 1610: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1589: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1567: 1559: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1532: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1505: 1503: 1502: 1497: 1490: 1484: 1483: 1474: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1460: 1453: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1403:Agreed with @ 1402: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1246: 1245:bonus episode 1242: 1238: 1234: 1229: 1223: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1200: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1179: 1175: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163:Imperfect Boy 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151:Heidi Saadiya 1144: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1110: 1104: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1055: 1049: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 996: 992: 988: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 943: 938: 937: 933: 929: 925: 917: 915: 914: 910: 906: 899: 896: 894: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 865: 863: 862: 858: 854: 849: 844: 840: 838: 833: 827: 811: 810:oac.cdlib.org 807: 801: 798: 794: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 766:Working list? 765: 763: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 738: 736: 735: 731: 727: 723: 715: 713: 712: 708: 704: 697: 693: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 666: 664: 663: 660: 655: 649: 645: 637: 635: 634: 630: 626: 622: 616: 614: 610: 606: 602: 599: 595: 592: 591:LGBT in Islam 588: 581: 577: 573: 570: 565: 563: 562:Bluerasberry 556: 555: 551: 546: 541: 537: 533: 529: 528: 523: 519: 515: 510: 507: 503: 498: 497: 496: 493: 485: 481: 477: 475: 471: 470: 463: 459: 454: 446: 445: 444: 443: 439: 435: 430: 428: 422: 420: 414: 410: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 389: 387: 376: 365: 363: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 336: 333: 327: 325: 321: 313: 311: 310: 306: 302: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 195: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 172: 171: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 147: 143: 142:CyntWorkStuff 139: 135: 134:Brenda Howard 128: 126: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5082:Naysha Lopez 5080: 5077:Naysha Lopez 5035: 5034: 5005:Historyday01 4978: 4975:Historyday01 4960:Historyday01 4945: 4922: 4901: 4897: 4887: 4881: 4877: 4848: 4822: 4794: 4771: 4753: 4728: 4697: 4676:SandyGeorgia 4670:— Preceding 4659: 4633: 4630: 4602: 4580:Purplewowies 4574: 4544:Purplewowies 4540: 4536: 4527: 4521: 4518: 4499: 4484: 4482:Hi, all -- 4481: 4460: 4455: 4432: 4405:Newimpartial 4377: 4360: 4353: 4328: 4307:Trey Maturin 4305: 4301:MOS:GENDERID 4297:MOS:GENDERID 4293:MOS:GENDERID 4267:Sideswipe9th 4259:MOS:GENDERID 4244: 4208: 4206:MOS:GENDERID 4186:Trey Maturin 4184: 4151: 4136: 4131: 4062:MOS:GENDERID 4037: 4009:Trey Maturin 4007: 4003: 3988: 3979: 3961: 3842: 3826:Newimpartial 3818:Newimpartial 3813: 3809: 3803: 3734: 3730: 3709: 3672: 3613: 3561: 3534: 3517: 3513: 3500: 3477: 3461:Newimpartial 3454: 3429: 3425: 3420: 3402: 3399: 3388: 3337: 3322:Trey Maturin 3320: 3293: 3277:Sideswipe9th 3265: 3246:Newimpartial 3238: 3215: 3183:, but other 3172: 3164:edit summary 3155: 3148: 3143: 3142: 3131:The article 3130: 3101:Newimpartial 3093: 3025:MOS:DEADNAME 2968: 2927: 2902: 2874:Bluerasberry 2856: 2853: 2841: 2840: 2830: 2826: 2825: 2821:LGB Alliance 2815:LGB Alliance 2781: 2774: 2751: 2728: 2722: 2721: 2669: 2646: 2627: 2621: 2617: 2581: 2572: 2552: 2515: 2484: 2478:Anti-trans? 2177: 2173: 2159: 2151: 2147: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2100: 2096: 2086: 2063: 2033: 2004: 2002: 1997: 1975: 1958: 1939: 1918: 1851: 1798: 1780: 1774: 1746: 1714: 1712: 1673: 1667: 1646: 1624: 1593: 1575: 1570: 1563: 1543: 1537: 1536: 1509: 1480: 1478: 1457: 1434: 1390: 1379:undue weight 1367: 1313: 1312: 1291:MEL Magazine 1289: 1249: 1230: 1227: 1204: 1182: 1148: 939: 921: 902: 869: 845: 841: 834: 831: 813:. Retrieved 809: 800: 792: 769: 742: 719: 703:Newimpartial 700: 670: 641: 625:203.0.31.200 617: 605:203.0.31.200 585: 561: 506:cleanup list 502:WP:LGBT/Core 465: 452: 431: 423: 415: 411: 390: 369: 338: 329: 317: 281: 275: 238: 197:about them. 150: 132: 109: 78: 43: 37: 5037:Sasha Colby 5021:Sasha Colby 4712:Nat Gertler 4660:There is a 4631:Hello all 4607:Nat Gertler 4560:Nat Gertler 4495:transgender 4361:Dr. Blofeld 3938:Plushwiki21 3905:Plushwiki21 3891:Plushwiki21 3865:Plushwiki21 3850:Plushwiki21 3426:reassessing 3405:Wakelamp db 1841:Kwamikagami 1757:Tobin Heath 1694:Doug Weller 1650:Doug Weller 1539:Ty Mitchell 1383:transgender 1276:DanielRigal 1101:AngusW🐶🐶F 1095:Plushwiki21 1091:Plushwiki21 1046:AngusW🐶🐶F 991:Plushwiki21 961:Plushwiki21 946:Plushwiki21 928:Plushwiki21 884:MisterWizzy 853:AukusRuckus 677:trans woman 451:parameter, 419:core topics 380:include an 288:article to 36:This is an 4829:JimKaatFan 4819:RfC notice 4729:Crossroads 4440:Shibboleth 4309:has spoken 4263:footnote b 4188:has spoken 4121:everybody. 4011:has spoken 3511:himself?-- 3324:has spoken 3300:Dwanyewest 2878:WP:APPNOTE 2691:Dronebogus 2495:anti-trans 2423:Johnmrri's 2059:Kiwi Farms 2003:New stub: 1985:part of me 1961:pride flag 1959:Currently 1178:Eli Erlick 963:: are you 940:The topic 922:I created 815:2022-08-01 793:References 644:Sally Ride 638:Sally Ride 582:and others 449:importance 382:importance 341:WP:POVFORK 254:A496084659 116:Blsternsun 98:Archive 79 90:Archive 77 85:Archive 76 79:Archive 75 73:Archive 74 68:Archive 73 60:Archive 70 4700:this edit 4520:here. On 3983:TheXuitts 3970:and also 3762:Elizium23 3683:Lajmmoore 3622:Trans fag 3564:Trans f*g 3514:Rockchalk 3430:initially 3197:consensus 3135:has been 3096:WP:FRINGE 3068:Marchjuly 3049:Marchjuly 3004:Marchjuly 2980:Marchjuly 2634:scheduled 2385:Politanvm 2362:Funcrunch 2070:Funcrunch 1462:Sharouser 1354:, we say 1188:Funcrunch 1070:AngusWOOF 977:Elizium23 969:AngusWOOF 658:(discuss) 213:Thryduulf 199:Thryduulf 176:Thryduulf 161:Thryduulf 5031:Resolved 4906:Mathglot 4684:contribs 4672:unsigned 4640:Volcom95 3962:See the 3869:Teahouse 3716:UtherSRG 3484:Iscargra 3421:articles 3315:WP:BLP1E 3201:UtherSRG 2944:Relisted 2882:Isabelle 2676:Matroxko 2649:MusikBot 2476:Genspect 2442:Johnmrri 2399:Johnmrri 2376:Johnmrri 2354:Johnmrri 2340:Johnmrri 2319:Johnmrri 2305:Johnmrri 2266:Johnmrri 2242:Johnmrri 2227:Johnmrri 2196:Johnmrri 2180:Johnmrri 2135:Andy Ngo 2117:Andy Ngo 2048:contribs 1977:Madeline 1691:thanks. 1598:X-Editor 1524:contribs 1322:sources? 653:Hawkeye7 301:ProfGray 138:Duke9000 4929:Trystan 4876:Use of 4778:Thriley 4461:JuanGLP 3934:WP:LEAD 3909:WP:LEAD 3781:Sevey13 3755:WP:EGRS 3739:Sevey13 3588:Sorry, 3545:Trystan 3435:Bearcat 3389:should 3222:Thriley 3090:editors 2758:McPhail 2708:has an 2670:Should 2576:@ AfD: 2560:ASUKITE 2526:Storchy 2252:Kingsif 2222:Thanks, 2206:Kingsif 2119:has an 2057:RfC on 1942:Trystan 1895:— kwami 1866:— kwami 1806:— kwami 1782:Kingsif 1770:carpet. 1739:WP:CALC 1632:ASUKITE 642:I have 589:in the 540:Trystan 514:Trystan 456:hits a 370:Should 349:WP:NPOV 298:Mhawk10 174:Hello @ 146:Stnwllr 39:archive 4864:Tamzin 4760:(talk) 4381:did a 3930:Kbabej 3916:Kbabej 3887:Kbabej 3873:Kbabej 3806:WP:RSN 3799:WP:RSN 3719:(talk) 3508:WP:NFL 3204:(talk) 3166:or on 3088:WP:POV 2909:(talk) 2863:(talk) 2801:Kbabej 2618:Hello, 2358:Kbabej 2323:Kbabej 2270:Kbabej 2160:(talk) 2148:Formal 2107:(talk) 1848:Bilorv 1775:should 1571:Joseph 1413:Kbabej 1409:WP:RSP 1405:Bilorv 1387:Bilorv 1342:Gebble 1327:Gebble 1296:Kbabej 1252:Gebble 1155:Kerala 1125:Kbabej 1087:Kbabej 1074:Kbabej 1027:Kbabej 1011:Kbabej 1003:Kbabej 995:WP:RSP 973:WP:GNG 905:Drmies 878:, and 568:(talk) 462:Bilorv 221:Kbabej 194:Kbabej 180:Kbabej 4898:legal 4878:legal 3964:WP:EW 3928:Hi, @ 3641:Faggy 3036:hotch 2978:. -- 2303:John 2300:Best, 2225:John 1668:Maddy 1358:. In 1352:QAnon 1211:Rab V 1159:India 1114:sniff 1059:sniff 534:(see 491:hotch 282:Note: 16:< 5115:Talk 5094:Talk 5066:Talk 5049:Talk 5009:talk 4993:Talk 4964:talk 4933:talk 4910:talk 4880:vs. 4833:talk 4808:Talk 4782:talk 4716:talk 4680:talk 4644:talk 4611:talk 4584:talk 4564:talk 4548:talk 4506:talk 4493:and 4468:talk 4409:talk 4339:talk 4271:talk 4070:talk 4051:chat 4027:talk 3996:talk 3942:talk 3920:talk 3903:Hi @ 3895:talk 3885:Hi @ 3877:talk 3863:Hi @ 3854:talk 3830:talk 3822:talk 3812:and 3785:talk 3766:talk 3743:talk 3687:talk 3597:talk 3572:talk 3549:talk 3488:talk 3465:talk 3439:talk 3409:talk 3373:Talk 3352:Talk 3304:talk 3281:talk 3250:talk 3226:talk 3105:talk 3086:New 3072:talk 3053:talk 3029:(CC) 3019:and 3008:talk 2984:talk 2952:talk 2934:talk 2805:talk 2790:talk 2762:talk 2739:talk 2695:talk 2689:Yes 2680:talk 2592:Talk 2530:talk 2503:talk 2460:talk 2446:talk 2431:talk 2403:talk 2374:Hi @ 2366:talk 2344:talk 2327:talk 2317:Hi @ 2309:talk 2274:talk 2256:talk 2231:talk 2210:talk 2184:talk 2152:Dude 2074:talk 2044:talk 2019:Talk 1946:talk 1899:talk 1870:talk 1854:talk 1829:talk 1825:Urve 1810:talk 1786:talk 1765:this 1759:and 1698:talk 1677:talk 1654:talk 1602:talk 1581:talk 1576:2302 1551:talk 1520:talk 1495:Talk 1466:talk 1445:talk 1417:talk 1393:talk 1331:talk 1300:talk 1280:talk 1256:talk 1215:talk 1192:talk 1167:talk 1129:talk 1108:bark 1078:talk 1053:bark 1031:talk 1015:talk 1007:talk 981:talk 950:talk 932:talk 909:talk 888:talk 857:talk 784:talk 757:talk 730:talk 707:talk 685:talk 629:talk 609:talk 518:talk 484:(CC) 468:talk 438:talk 357:talk 353:Loki 305:talk 294:here 262:talk 258:Urve 251:Gale 225:talk 203:talk 184:talk 165:talk 120:talk 4900:or 4892:at 4861:-- 4858:. 4702:to 4528:why 4491:LBG 4443:ink 4137:lot 4132:not 3966:at 3630:RfD 3614:and 3239:At 3117:of 2756:". 2710:RFC 2582:--- 2491:RFC 2474:Is 2121:RFC 1674::: 1664:;; 1009:)| 724:.-- 453:but 388:? 343:of 243:doi 5011:) 4966:) 4935:) 4912:) 4835:) 4784:) 4718:) 4686:) 4682:• 4646:) 4613:) 4586:) 4575:or 4566:) 4550:) 4508:) 4471:) 4411:) 4357:♦ 4341:) 4333:. 4273:) 4236:) 4234:📝 4232:• 4230:💬 4204:. 4072:) 4054:) 4029:) 3998:) 3974:: 3944:) 3922:) 3897:) 3879:) 3856:) 3832:) 3824:) 3787:) 3768:) 3745:) 3689:) 3659:) 3657:📝 3655:• 3653:💬 3643:→ 3624:→ 3599:) 3574:) 3551:) 3522:17 3490:) 3467:) 3459:. 3441:) 3411:) 3306:) 3283:) 3252:) 3228:) 3170:. 3153:. 3107:) 3074:) 3055:) 3033:Tb 3010:) 2986:) 2954:) 2936:) 2807:) 2792:) 2784:. 2764:) 2741:) 2697:) 2682:) 2645:— 2532:) 2505:) 2462:) 2448:) 2433:) 2405:) 2368:) 2346:) 2329:) 2311:) 2276:) 2258:) 2233:) 2212:) 2186:) 2076:) 2050:) 2046:/ 1989:) 1948:) 1901:) 1872:) 1858:) 1831:) 1812:) 1804:. 1788:) 1604:) 1583:) 1553:) 1526:) 1522:/ 1514:. 1468:) 1447:) 1419:) 1397:) 1333:) 1302:) 1282:) 1258:) 1217:) 1209:. 1194:) 1169:) 1157:, 1131:) 1117:) 1111:• 1080:) 1062:) 1056:• 1033:) 1017:) 983:) 952:) 934:) 911:) 890:) 882:. 874:, 859:) 808:. 786:) 759:) 732:) 709:) 687:) 631:) 615:‎ 611:) 520:) 488:Tb 472:) 440:) 378:}} 372:{{ 359:) 326:: 307:) 264:) 249:, 241:, 227:) 205:) 186:) 167:) 122:) 94:→ 64:← 5118:) 5112:( 5097:) 5091:( 5069:) 5063:( 5052:) 5046:( 5007:( 4996:) 4990:( 4973:@ 4962:( 4931:( 4908:( 4831:( 4811:) 4805:( 4780:( 4714:( 4678:( 4642:( 4609:( 4582:( 4562:( 4546:( 4504:( 4465:( 4407:( 4394:☼ 4337:( 4269:( 4228:( 4224:– 4068:( 4048:( 4025:( 3994:( 3940:( 3918:( 3893:( 3875:( 3852:( 3828:( 3820:( 3783:( 3764:( 3741:( 3685:( 3651:( 3610:: 3606:@ 3595:( 3586:: 3582:@ 3570:( 3547:( 3519:7 3486:( 3463:( 3437:( 3407:( 3376:) 3370:( 3355:) 3349:( 3302:( 3279:( 3248:( 3224:( 3103:( 3070:( 3051:( 3006:( 2982:( 2950:( 2932:( 2896:: 2892:@ 2872:@ 2803:( 2788:( 2760:( 2737:( 2693:( 2678:( 2595:) 2589:( 2528:( 2501:( 2458:( 2444:( 2429:( 2401:( 2364:( 2352:@ 2342:( 2325:( 2307:( 2272:( 2264:@ 2254:( 2244:: 2240:@ 2229:( 2208:( 2198:: 2194:@ 2182:( 2072:( 2042:( 2022:) 2016:( 1981:( 1944:( 1897:( 1890:: 1886:@ 1868:( 1850:( 1843:: 1839:@ 1827:( 1808:( 1784:( 1749:! 1687:@ 1600:( 1579:( 1549:( 1518:( 1498:) 1492:( 1464:( 1443:( 1415:( 1389:( 1344:: 1340:@ 1329:( 1298:( 1278:( 1254:( 1213:( 1190:( 1165:( 1127:( 1105:( 1076:( 1068:@ 1050:( 1029:( 1013:( 1005:( 989:@ 979:( 967:@ 959:@ 948:( 930:( 907:( 886:( 855:( 818:. 782:( 755:( 728:( 705:( 683:( 627:( 607:( 552:. 516:( 464:( 436:( 408:6 405:5 402:4 399:3 396:2 393:1 355:( 303:( 260:( 245:: 223:( 211:@ 201:( 192:@ 182:( 163:( 118:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 75 - Knowledge

Index