Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Plants/Archive27 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source šŸ“

253:, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best. 189:, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best. 866: 731: 31: 956: 540: 796: 495:
plants are in relation to one-another. The spatial/locational aspects are important, as are the evolutionary relationships. For example, the set of adaptations that you find in Mediterranean climates is an ecophysiological question. The difference in the species composition between these regions
451:
edit conflict - I am just taking an uneducated guess here: Floristics tells us what plants live in an area with such and such boundaries, while phytogeography tells us what plants live under specific conditions. One says plants "x","y" and "z" live here while the other says plant "x" lives under
419:
It hadn't crossed my mind that the distinction was unclear, but now you ask it's not trivial to put it into words - try - phytogeography focuses on the areas in which plants are found (and how they ended up there), and floristics on which plants are found in an area. Phytogeography is more
437:
Okay, I think I get your drift. So if choose a locality and ask questions about the plant species that occur there ā€“ "What species occur here; why so many/few; why this species and not that species? what are the factors that have influenced the biodiversity of this locality?" ā€“ that's
121:
because the former is the disease and the latter is the fungus. I'm not expert, and I don't know how things work in WP Fungi, so I thought I'd post this here. The P. weirii article is still very focus on the disease rather than on the fungus so you might want to take a look at
316: 409:? According to Knowledge (XXG), the former "studies distribution and relationships of plant species over geographic areas", while the latter "is concerned with the geographic distribution of plant species". It is all as clear as mud to me. 442:. Whereas if I choose a taxon and ask questions about the localities in which it occurs ā€” "Where does it occur; why such a large/small range; why here and not over there; how did it get here?" ā€” that's biogeography. Does that sound right? 364:
I don't now actually know how to rephrase it to incorporate the Ficus Indica or Ficus Indicus synonyms. Hehe. I do believe it should be there, though, to prevent confusion. It seems Ficus Indica/Ficus Indicus is in common use in the
556:(Coast Beard Heath), but I have absolutely no knowledge in this area so some help in identifying this plant would be good (before I go uploading others under the wrong name)! The image was taken in coastal Victoria, Australia. -- 802:
G'day I was after an identification of this orchid from the tasmanian botanical gardens, unfortunately it was untagged but I think it's a species of Cymbidium, probably a cultivar, any help would be greatly appreciated.
510:
OK, thanks that makes it more clear for me...It looks like I was to preoccupied with here and now issue of what plants live were and completely neglected the past and the how and from whom they came from questions.
1033:. This page is the most commonly used venue for plant ID - it was thought a few months ago that a separate ID page cold be established if demand increased, which it certainly has in the last few weeks. 746:
I own a few electron microscope photos of yucca elata pollen grains. They look just like puffed wheat cereal. If there is any use for them, I would be glad to post them, but need help to do so.
1047:
Thanks. I suspect demand would largely be seasonal, it is spring in many parts of the southern hemisphere at the moment, and the same would be true in six months on the other side of the world.
594:
Thanks. I didn't bother putting all the information onto that cropped image, that was only for identification purposes. I've uploaded the uncropped version along with some others
963:
Need some help with the unidentified thing here (is flower the right term?). Is this the best place to ask on wikipedia for identification or is there a help desk or something?
135: 145:
I'm not really aware of a consensus one way or the other about whether to combine the disease article and the pathogen article. See for example the discussion at
94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 765:; we can only use the images if you took them or a few other categories. As for whether there would be a place for them, there probably are enough images at 215:
can be deleted but I'm not sure how to propose that. If someone is attached to this image, I don't think there is any copyright issue with the original at
487:
I think you're right on floristics, but your second definition is more ecology (community ecophysiology?) than phytogeography, I think. Phytogeography (
47: 17: 1031: 657: 149:
which seemed pretty inconclusive and didn't have a lot of people commenting on it. Either way, there's plenty of room for expanding the
574: 595: 818:
Cultivated Orchids are not easy to ID, since the majority of them are hybrids. But maybe some one can put a name on this one.
287:, a currently accepted species designation, or has it been renamed or something? It's not listed as a classification under 250: 220: 212: 186: 466:
I have long thought of floristics as a subdiscipline of phytogeography, probably because I learned it that way from
38: 348: 653: 1052: 1027: 968: 808: 374: 296: 645: 602: 475: 762: 1016: 833: 823: 649: 516: 457: 428: 261: 197: 146: 1056: 1042: 1020: 972: 937: 911: 897: 882: 865: 848: 827: 812: 784: 775:
article could perhaps use them, or maybe some other article if the photo helped illustrate some point.
755: 720: 702: 678: 614: 585: 565: 520: 505: 479: 461: 446: 432: 413: 390: 378: 352: 300: 265: 232: 201: 168: 139: 1038: 844: 751: 747: 716: 698: 610: 581: 342: 893: 675: 561: 501: 443: 410: 1048: 964: 804: 370: 360: 325: 292: 208: 176: 150: 127: 114: 107: 730: 320: 933: 907: 878: 780: 576:. If you can provide location/region info on the image description page, that would be great. 471: 228: 164: 632: 131: 1012: 819: 512: 453: 424: 257: 193: 155: 118: 103: 955: 1034: 924: 840: 712: 694: 606: 577: 330: 216: 873:
Can anyone tell what species of plant this is? It seems to be some type of wild cherry.
539: 889: 557: 497: 423:
Or, phytogeography is the study of plant distribution; floristics the study of floras.
406: 984:
inflorescence. Colloquially you could call it a flower in the same way as you call an
918: 467: 420:
theoretical, and floristics more descriptive. (See also zoogeography and faunistics.)
385: 123: 795: 988: 929: 903: 874: 776: 689: 488: 307: 224: 160: 771: 366: 280: 240: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
572: 985: 684: 548: 402: 993: 980: 337:
is the widely accepted name. The only certainty I can provide is that it is
997: 671: 1008: 1004: 766: 452:
these conditions and "y" lives under other conditions. Am I close?
288: 916:
Judging by the location, it seems like it would have to be either
794: 538: 1007:- this is composed of many small flowers; the other bit is the 470:. But I like Hesperian's distinction as a working definition.-- 629:
Could someone please help identify the plant in this picture:
25: 397:
What is the difference between floristics and phytogeography?
256:
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--
192:
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--
211:
with another image from commons. I think this means
311:is given as cross reference to the tagalog phrase 631: 275:If I may ask,as a point of clarification, is the 693:; probably a cultivar of which there are many. 384:I've incorporated the synonym in the taxobox.-- 8: 888:It looks more like a species of crabapple. 839:hybrids making ID very difficult indeed. -- 249:An image used in the article, specifically 185:An image used in the article, specifically 763:Knowledge (XXG):COPYRIGHT#Image guidelines 954: 864: 729: 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Plants 219:, just the color-corrected version at 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 315:in sources on ethnopharmacology etc. 7: 147:Talk:Sudden oak death#Requested move 329:(Banyan tree), which agrees with a 207:I've gone ahead and replaced it on 491:in general) is also interested in 24: 902:Interesting. Any idea which one? 598:. --23:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 323:, states that it is a synonym of 869:Wild cherries growing in Indiana 496:is a phytogeographic question. 29: 625:Please help identify this plant 401:What's the difference between 358:Hehe. Given the many names of 251:Image:Juvenile anthocyanin.jpg 1: 1057:10:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 1043:10:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 1021:09:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 973:07:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 938:16:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 912:15:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 898:15:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 883:15:13, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 849:12:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 828:12:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 813:11:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 785:05:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 756:13:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 721:05:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 703:04:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 679:04:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 615:01:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 586:23:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 566:11:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 521:18:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 506:16:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 480:04:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 221:Image:Juniperus communis.jpg 213:Image:Juniperus communis.jpg 187:Image:Juniperus communis.jpg 571:Yes, that appears correct. 462:07:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 447:06:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 433:06:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 414:03:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 391:01:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 379:18:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 353:17:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 301:10:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 266:01:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 233:01:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 202:01:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 169:01:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 140:09:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1077: 857:Request identification of 546:I'm pretty sure this is a 333:database that states that 239:Image needs replacement - 175:Image needs replacement - 832:Yes, there are thousands 761:Well, to start with, see 117:as a seperate entry than 1028:Anthurium scherzerianum 959:Anthurium scherzerianum 922:(Prairie Crabapple) or 1003:The spike is called a 960: 870: 799: 791:Request identification 738: 639: 554:Leucopogon parviflorus 543: 958: 868: 798: 733: 637: 542: 42:of past discussions. 951:No clue what this is 861:crabapple(?) species 707:It looks a lot like 634:File:Red Banksia.jpg 343:Opuntia ficus-indica 928:(Sweet Crabapple). 711:'Scarlet Ribbon' -- 535:Identification help 484:Hardyplants: No.Ā :) 217:et:Pilt:Kadakas.jpg 961: 871: 800: 739: 670:; it looks like a 640: 544: 361:Ficus benghalensis 326:Ficus benghalensis 319:. Another source, 209:Juniperus communis 177:Juniperus communis 151:Laminated root rot 115:Laminated root rot 108:Laminated root rot 1025:It appears to be 662: 648:comment added by 601:I've commenced a 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1068: 737:'Scarlet Ribbon' 683:Yes it's within 661: 642: 635: 388: 351: 156:Phellinus weirii 119:Phellinus weirii 104:Phellinus weirii 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1067: 1066: 1065: 953: 925:Malus coronaria 863: 793: 744: 687:- the genus is 643: 633: 627: 537: 399: 386: 369:, at least. -- 349:cygnis insignis 347: 335:F. benghalensis 313:baleting-baging 285:baleting-baging 279:, known in the 273: 244: 180: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1074: 1072: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1001: 952: 949: 947: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 862: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 792: 789: 788: 787: 743: 740: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 626: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 589: 588: 536: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 485: 482: 421: 407:phytogeography 398: 395: 394: 393: 356: 355: 272: 269: 246:Hello all... 243: 237: 236: 235: 182:Hello all... 179: 173: 172: 171: 110: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1073: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049:Noodle snacks 1046: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 999: 996: 995: 990: 987: 983: 982: 977: 976: 975: 974: 970: 966: 965:Noodle snacks 957: 950: 948: 939: 935: 931: 927: 926: 921: 920: 919:Malus ioensis 915: 914: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900: 899: 895: 891: 887: 886: 885: 884: 880: 876: 867: 860: 856: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 831: 830: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 805:Flying Freddy 797: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 773: 768: 764: 760: 759: 758: 757: 753: 749: 741: 736: 732: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 705: 704: 700: 696: 692: 691: 686: 682: 681: 680: 677: 673: 669: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650:58.169.107.35 647: 636: 630: 624: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 599: 597: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 583: 579: 575: 573: 570: 569: 568: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 550: 541: 534: 522: 518: 514: 509: 508: 507: 503: 499: 494: 490: 486: 483: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468:Grady Webster 465: 464: 463: 459: 455: 450: 449: 448: 445: 441: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 417: 416: 415: 412: 408: 404: 396: 392: 389: 383: 382: 381: 380: 376: 372: 371:Alternativity 368: 363: 362: 354: 350: 345: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 327: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 305: 304: 303: 302: 298: 294: 293:Alternativity 290: 286: 282: 278: 271:Ficus Indica? 270: 268: 267: 263: 259: 254: 252: 247: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 190: 188: 183: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 157: 152: 148: 144: 143: 142: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 120: 116: 113:I've created 109: 105: 102: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1026: 992: 989:pseudanthium 979: 962: 946: 923: 917: 872: 858: 836: 801: 770: 745: 742:pollen photo 735:Leucospermum 734: 709:Leucospermum 708: 690:Leucospermum 688: 667: 644:ā€” Preceding 641: 628: 553: 547: 545: 492: 489:biogeography 472:Curtis Clark 439: 400: 359: 357: 341: 338: 334: 324: 312: 308:Ficus indica 306: 284: 277:Ficus indica 276: 274: 255: 248: 245: 191: 184: 181: 154: 112: 78: 43: 37: 1013:Lavateraguy 820:Hardyplants 772:Yucca elata 666:It isn't a 638:Red Banksia 552:, probably 513:Hardyplants 454:Hardyplants 425:Lavateraguy 367:Philippines 281:Philippines 258:Jordan 1972 241:Anthocyanin 194:Jordan 1972 36:This is an 1035:Melburnian 841:Melburnian 748:Yucca moth 713:Melburnian 695:Melburnian 685:Proteaceae 607:Melburnian 605:, thanks. 596:to Commons 578:Melburnian 549:Leucopogon 440:floristics 403:floristics 291:. Thanks. 159:articles. 132:WP Physics 95:ArchiveĀ 30 90:ArchiveĀ 29 85:ArchiveĀ 28 79:ArchiveĀ 27 73:ArchiveĀ 26 68:ArchiveĀ 25 60:ArchiveĀ 20 1000:a flower. 994:Euphorbia 986:composite 981:Anthurium 890:Colchicum 837:Cymbidium 676:Hesperian 498:Guettarda 444:Hesperian 411:Hesperian 317:Torkelson 998:cyathium 978:It's an 769:but the 658:contribs 646:unsigned 387:Lenticel 124:Headbomb 991:or an 930:Kaldari 904:Kaldari 875:Kaldari 777:Kingdon 674:to me. 672:Waratah 668:Banksia 331:unimelb 321:NewCROP 225:Kingdon 161:Kingdon 153:and/or 39:archive 1009:spathe 1005:spadix 859:cherry 767:Pollen 558:bainer 289:Banyan 493:where 16:< 1053:talk 1039:talk 1017:talk 969:talk 934:talk 908:talk 894:talk 879:talk 845:talk 824:talk 809:talk 781:talk 752:talk 717:talk 699:talk 654:talk 611:talk 603:stub 582:talk 562:talk 517:talk 502:talk 476:talk 458:talk 429:talk 405:and 375:talk 346::-) 297:talk 262:talk 229:talk 198:talk 165:talk 136:PotW 128:Ļ„Ī±Ī»Īŗ 106:and 835:of 339:not 283:as 122:it. 1055:) 1041:) 1019:) 1011:. 971:) 936:) 910:) 896:) 881:) 847:) 826:) 811:) 783:) 754:) 719:) 701:) 660:) 656:ā€¢ 613:) 584:) 564:) 519:) 504:) 478:) 460:) 431:) 377:) 299:) 264:) 231:) 223:. 200:) 167:) 138:} 134:: 130:ā€“ 64:ā† 1051:( 1037:( 1015:( 967:( 932:( 906:( 892:( 877:( 843:( 822:( 807:( 779:( 750:( 715:( 697:( 652:( 609:( 580:( 560:( 515:( 500:( 474:( 456:( 427:( 373:( 295:( 260:( 227:( 196:( 163:( 126:{ 50:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Plants
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 20
ArchiveĀ 25
ArchiveĀ 26
ArchiveĀ 27
ArchiveĀ 28
ArchiveĀ 29
ArchiveĀ 30
Phellinus weirii
Laminated root rot
Laminated root rot
Phellinus weirii
Headbomb
Ļ„Ī±Ī»Īŗ
WP Physics
PotW
09:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sudden oak death#Requested move
Laminated root rot
Phellinus weirii
Kingdon
talk
01:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Juniperus communis
Image:Juniperus communis.jpg
Jordan 1972
talk
01:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘