Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Podcasting/Archive 4 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source šŸ“

1089:
name = John Doe |" the only space that means anything, is the one betweeen "John" and "Doe".) The other spaces around the pipe will help user readability of the syntax, but they have no impact on what gets displayed. I prefer a space after the parameter value/before the pipe, but no space after, but I learned not to care once I put it in. Sometimes you will see editors remove all spaces from templates on a page, and then other editors adding spaces in... -
31: 693: 580: 276:
matter. Good article is a good goal but it doesn't mean it will always happen, not with this level of activity, and there is no reason to think that it's a failure unless that happens. Improving an article should be the goal in and of itself. I would suggest finding/creating a template to add to the article's talk page to indicate that the article was selected for improvement by the project (like
671: 704: 682: 307:(a better place for article-specific discussions). Good Article is a good goal, but a 4-season show that's mostly based on season 1 is going to need some work to get there. I'm happy to answer questions and help out a bit, but please ping me if you want to get my attention, since I'm mostly focused on "real life" stuff these days.Ā :) ā€” 740:
episodes, one of which is only about five minutes long. From what I can tell the only reason it was even made into an article was because of it's connection to Stephen Fry, but I'm not sure it even meets Knowledge (XXG)'s notability standards. Are there any objections to me changing the articles status?
1194:
Cool. I have a lot more time for Knowledge (XXG) now, so I should be of more help. I think there needs to be a better way of showing which campaigns/episodes are freely available on the feed and which ones aren't. Both the Amnesty and Graduation summaries are pretty lackluster, but I haven't listened
739:
and I've got to say even after improving it a bit the article seems more like a Class C article of Low Importance not a "Good Article". The article only has ten sources after I added some myself, and five of them are references to his website and podcast. The podcast released a whopping total of nine
1114:
We can chose to discuss goals for this article in here or on the talk page over there. What improvements need to be made to bring this up before submitting it to be reviewed for GA? I think it's better than start class, which is how it's currently labeled. I'm pinging a few people who have worked on
1088:
This doesn't really matter. Similar to the way the WikiMedia code will reduce a double space after a period to render as a single space. If you're within a template bracket, the code will really ignore any empty space unless it is part of a value assigned to a parameter. (E.g. if the code sees "|
1010:
project for example, depricated the Importance parameter, presumably because the project felt like nobody used that information in a useful way. You might have seen some Task Force breakdowns for large projects that have people that focus on one specific area. You might also see some finer "class"
990:
My second question concerning standard format conventions is about the extra fields. I've noticed a couple of the tags have more fields than just "class" and "importance". I don't remember what they were exactly, but I was wondering if anyone had a link to a page describing the other fields so I can
303:! For background, I started the article before there was even a season 2. There hasn't been a ton of work done to it since then, with the exception of added episode tables. I haven't checked for new sources in a while, but here are some concrete things that could be improved. I've left a note on the 1141:
Hey there. To really lift this I think we should be potentially splitting Balance out as its own article and shifting all the sub-arc summaries there, as it does come off a little strange that we have way more detailed synopses for Balance than Amnesty say, leaving only a short overview on the main
1072:
My fourth question concerning standard format conventions is about spacing. How should the tag be spaced? Should there be a space between each vertical pipe? A space on either side of the equal sign? Should each field get a newline? Or should I always follow the pre-existing conventions being used?
255:
Ear Hustle is currently a C-class article, but has anyone tried to assess if it actually got to B-class between the assessment and now? I'm just interested in coming up with a good checklist of steps to take for the collaboration. Also, curious if you thought discussion would be best to stay here
402:
It should also be current, meaning in production or at least relatively safe from podfade. Iā€™ll look at the top lists on iTunes. Where are some other podcast ratings lists to check? I liked Blood Ties, and it even got a write up in the WSJ, but itā€™s wrapped. Iā€™m at a disadvantage, because I listen
378:
Hi there. New member to the project. I like the idea of rotating monthly through different articles, even if they donā€™t quite make it as far as weā€™d hope. Perhaps a list, as you suggested, flipping monthly from fiction to nonfiction, of articles to be worked on and articles like Ear Hustle get put
275:
The creator and significant contributor of Ear Hustle is Rhododendrites, a very experienced editor. I have notified them that the article has been selected and is being discussed here. With any luck, they should see the messages and respond. For now, I would say that C-class v B-class doesn't much
340:
Hey everyone! It's been a month since we started on Ear Hustle and we haven't made a whole ton of progress. Due to the lack of participation, maybe we should change the article of the month to something like the "Current Article Collaboration", and simply work on it until we think it's as good as
948:
My first question concerning standard format conventions is how should tags be capitalized? Should "class" and "importance" ever be capitalized (I've only ever seen them lowercase)? Should "stub", "start", "c", and other quality ratings be capitalized or lowercase? Should "low", "mid", and other
1529:
I was kind of just curious what navboxes we're actually relevant to most of the project's articles. Both Web Syndication / Podcasting and Aggregators seem irrelevant to most pages. The link to the old podcasting template was actually super helpful. I'll probably work on making a new one for
900:
The other major outliers I've notice are the only remaining prose articles--from "Stub" to "B"--that still have an importance rating of "NA" link to pages with pre-existing importance ratings that are not "NA", which makes it impossible to change the importance rating from the current "NA".
356:
On the other hand, giving people a fresh article to work on could help with editor interest. Maybe leaving it and then revisiting Ear Hustle later on could help with getting more people engaged? There really aren't enough people active in this project to do a rapid overhaul of any article.
466:
Sounds good to me! We can check for trending podcasts and compile a list of cult famous podcasts to make a list for the next few months. We also have the "Podcasting articles by quality and importance" chart that we can work from. I'll make a new section for our list right below this one.
1273:
is used for a few podcasting articles. Would it be appropriate to include this on every podcasting related page or a specific type of podcasting related page? Are there other common authority control templates that would be useful to include in the guidelines for podcasting articles?
974:
template to cite sources, the parameters don't matter if you capitalize them or not. As for the values, for these banners, the template will simply populate the banners with a fixed style display. If class=Start or Class=start, the box will still display a "C".
876:
I am one of those that rarely ever looks at these assessment tables, but from what I can tell, we don't need that to be consistent with other tables unless we really want to. Other seems fine, but if we want it to be "Draft" then that can be edited at this link:
1289:
It'd be appropriate for some pages, I'd say, but we should neither require nor forbid it. It's just a navbox, not an authority control template, since it's linking to our pages about the concepts, not external links related to the specific page it's placed on.
1056:
These can be done in any order. The template code should arrange things automatically into the format set by the template. As long as the parameter is within the curly brackets containing the template, it will automatically get placed correctly by the code.
930:
I figured it out. They were redirects that had standard quality and importance ratings, but because they linked to a section in an article I didn't notice the link at the top of the page explaining that it was a redirect. I went through and corrected them.
1344:
redirects to the Web syndication template; was there any intention for a podcasting specific template to be made? I just realized we have section with the different templates on the Wikiproject main page and saw that there is a template for
563:
is focusing on women working behind the scenes in theatre and broadcasting. As podcasting is an increasingly important component here, we hope members of WP Podcasting will be inspired to participate. You can find further details at
1313:
What would the criteria be for whether an article should include the nav box or not? I've noticed the nav box is mostly about blogging and other forms of web syndication so I'd assume it'd be most useful on pages with subjects like
1493:
use on a more general level, really it comes down to if someone thinks there is a clear link between certain topics and navigating between them is something someone is likely interested in. Some podcasting examples I've seen are
452:. That gives us a starting list to chose from at least. Should we just pick a podcast that's trending that month? I think we should also be able include more "cult famous" podcasts w a big fanbase like TMA or ars Paradoxica. 1040:
My third question concerning standard format conventions is what order should the fields be arranged in? I've mostly seen "class" followed by "importance", but what if I introduce an additional field like I mentioned above?
321:
Hi! I'm a bit late to this, but my idea for future collaborations of the month would to switch between fiction and nonfiction podcasts each month. There's a lot of incomplete coverage of fiction podcasts (ex. how incomplete
284:). A new section at the article talk page informing and discussing the same, and notifying previous significant contributors to the article on their user talk pages w-/sh-ould also help elicit better participation. Regards! 492:
The thing about sorting the podcast articles like that is that the project is very incomplete. Working off of trending lists seems like the best way to start off, and then we can figure out how to continue from there.
755:
Go for it. I don't think that's a GA either. To change this, you have to delist it as a GA, not just change the way it's rated in the podcasting box. It's still notable because it was top downloaded at some point.
770:
I looked into the appropriate way to delist an article and I've started the Good Article Reassessment process if anyone from the wikiproject would like to provide input please visit the article's talk page.
1487:
which was redirected way back when. The red linked deleted templates are a bit of an eyesore, but you can see what it used to be and see if there's a better way to re-organize and restore it.
512:
mentioned above. Potential short-term collaborations could also be to create new articles that should have articles. (Some of them above and listed below are not going to podcast pages:
156:
This is not a bad suggestion, but do you have something more specific in mind? I would be willing to contribute, but offhand, I am unfamiliar with what podcasts might cover this topic. -
949:
importance ratings be capitalized or lowercase? Should I just use whatever is already being used on the given talk page (what about when the capitalization is already inconsistent)?
1021:
For further info, you should be able to go to the banner's specific template page. In the search bar, put "Template:" in front of whatever banner you're looking at. For example
1514:. Just be cautious with creating them as sometimes you can run into Navbox clutter (Disadvantage #10) if people start adding a Navbox for everything related to the article. - 661: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1355:. Should that template be on every page for apps, platforms, and RSS related technology pages? And should both aggregators and web syndication be on all the same pages? 542:
Thanks. I should be able to get back to editing some more soon. I'm in the midst of Hurricane Sally cleanup, so a lot of my free time and free energy has evaporated. -
631: 625: 619: 613: 607: 565: 215:
The goal of article of the month is to have the article to be certified as an Good Article, so we could potentially still make Ear Hustle the article of the month.
250: 834:
Yeah, that's definitely something we should eventually improve. Thank you for bringing it to our attention, we'll make sure to add it to the list of todos.
637: 1015:
are some kind of intermediate step. Right now, article is Class C, to reach Class B, these items are achieved, or need to be achieved. Are things like
647: 1195:
to Amnesty recently enough to write about it. I'll also look up some more info about splitting articles so we can split Balance into its own article.
878: 47: 17: 1408: 1225:
Following in the fiction to nonfiction pattern, the next article collaboration will be 99% Invisible, which is currently a start-class article.
568:. The Women in Red invitation for November is copied below. Please feel free to send it to any potentially interested participants or projects. 857:
The first outlier is that our chart contains a row dedicated to "other" despite the fact that every article in the row has a "draft" class and
882: 807: 655: 587: 136: 1429:
I haven't looked into it enough to say. We should try to avoid too much overlap, but if you think it's needed, feel to free to create.
341:
we're going to get it before moving on to another article. I like the idea of alternating between fiction and nonfiction podcasts.
1412: 1484: 107:
If anyone has a proposal for the collaboration of the month add it to the discussion here. I'll be changing it on August 1st.
1380:. As for the whole group of navboxes, without looking into it, I'm not surprised to hear that that realm is somewhat messy. 885:
this table is also different. Don't feel a need to make everything match a golden example, because I doubt there is one. -
190:
I cant find much in terms of reliable secondary source coverage out there discussing this podcast. I'd be concerned of its
1508: 1143: 38: 1146:
was set out. Secondly a slight reorganisation might be in order separating out primary seasons from minor arcs. --
1022: 1407:? We could pretty easily use bits of each of the navigation boxes and just combine them. I also just discovered 560: 1544:
It's an old revision, but you should be able to edit that particular version to undo the redirect. (Just FYI) -
1467: 1270: 1230: 1200: 1128: 761: 498: 457: 441: 393: 362: 331: 1473:
navbox? Or are you wondering what other kinds of navboxes might be appropriate? If you're interested in the
964:
This doesn't matter. Most templates and their parameters are not case sensitive. For example, if you use a
736: 1553: 1539: 1535: 1523: 1447: 1424: 1420: 1398: 1364: 1360: 1308: 1283: 1279: 1258: 1234: 1204: 1177: 1155: 1132: 1098: 1082: 1078: 1066: 1050: 1046: 1034: 1000: 996: 984: 958: 954: 940: 936: 925: 910: 906: 894: 870: 866: 843: 839: 828: 780: 776: 765: 749: 745: 725: 546: 537: 502: 476: 472: 461: 407: 397: 383: 366: 350: 346: 335: 316: 293: 269: 224: 220: 203: 180:
is already an article, but one that I've been recommended that still needs an article is Behind the Police.
165: 140: 132: 116: 112: 1142:
page. A Balance arc article should meet general notability guidelines with flying colours, similar to how
289: 1498: 800: 789: 445: 437: 413: 122:
My suggestion is that we do a podcast related to police brutality, incarceration, or black lives matter.
449: 425: 1349: 1016: 433: 279: 1477: 1338: 1226: 1196: 1168:
I did the reorganisation bit, but splitting Balance out as a separate article is yet to be done. --
1124: 757: 543: 509: 494: 453: 429: 404: 389: 380: 373: 358: 327: 323: 309: 1490: 858: 1531: 1458: 1416: 1369: 1356: 1327: 1275: 1106: 1074: 1042: 992: 950: 932: 902: 862: 835: 772: 741: 468: 421: 388:
Cool, which podcasts do you think we should do? It should be something big and popular probably.
342: 244: 240: 216: 210: 185: 151: 128: 108: 1545: 1515: 1090: 1058: 1026: 976: 917: 886: 529: 261: 195: 172: 157: 721: 286: 1123:. After working on this I think that means we have to pick a nonfiction podcast for January. 1007: 1173: 1151: 191: 1373: 1315: 521: 517: 417: 304: 257: 249:
I just wanted to check, but to get to GA status, the assement follows this page, correct?
1377: 1331: 1218: 1549: 1519: 1319: 1094: 1062: 1030: 980: 921: 890: 533: 265: 199: 161: 1120: 692: 968: 717: 696: 1403:
Do you think it'd be appropriate to create a new template specific to podcasting
861:
contains a graph that displays a brown column dedicated to "drafts" not "other".
1169: 1147: 1116: 579: 525: 513: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
796:
I didn't realize this project was active when I recently had a question about
300: 177: 1006:
This is basically something that a very active project could customize. The
1435: 1404: 1386: 1296: 1246: 816: 326:
is despite of its popularity), so I think collaboration could benefit them.
810:, and might provide fodder if anyone wants to try to improve the template. 670: 703: 674: 685: 681: 808:
Help_talk:Citation_Style_1/Archive_73#Podcasts_published_by_newspaper
707: 854:
I was curious about a few outliers and standard format conventions.
735:
I wanted to see what a "good podcast article" was so I checked out
596:
November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
1326:
and other technologies rather than on a page for a podcast like
379:
back on the list repeatedly until they reach ā€œGoodā€ quality? -
1323: 25: 578: 1372:, I'd agree that the navboxes should be used on pages like 1115:
the article recently to see if they would like to join:
555:
November focus on women in behind-the-scenes occupations
916:
Not sure on this one... Maybe link to an example? -
403:through PocketCasts, which doesnā€™t use ratings. - 251:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Podcasting/Assessment 412:This week's top fiction podcasts on iTunes are 194:survival chances. Can you find good coverage? - 299:Hey all, thanks for the interest in improving 8: 1483:template, you can review this older version 103:Proposal for the Collaboration of the month 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Podcasting 702: 691: 680: 669: 126: 1105:Collaboration of the Month for December: 879:User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/Podcasting 1265:Authority Control & Navigation Boxes 1217:Collaboration of the Month for January: 1409:Template:Podcast distribution platforms 1463:Are you specifically asking about the 850:Quality & Importance (The Details) 508:I redlinked some of the podcasts that 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1415:of our quality and importance table. 883:User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/Comics 7: 24: 29: 1485:Special:PermanentLink/292390044 991:familiarize myself with them. 547:18:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 538:21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 1376:, not specific podacsts like 1365:16:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 1309:03:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 1284:03:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 1205:22:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC) 1178:22:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC) 1099:00:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1083:03:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 1067:00:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1051:02:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 1035:00:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1001:02:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 985:00:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 959:02:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 941:18:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 926:00:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 911:02:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 895:00:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 871:02:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC) 844:15:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC) 829:05:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC) 781:15:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 656:Join WikiProject Women in Red 503:03:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 477:01:17, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 462:22:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC) 408:20:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC) 398:19:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC) 384:22:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC) 367:13:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC) 351:20:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC) 1156:18:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC) 1144:Critical Role (campaign two) 1133:18:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC) 881:. As a point of reference, 766:17:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC) 750:17:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC) 726:11:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 636:Help us plan future events: 1554:22:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 1540:21:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 1524:21:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC) 1448:16:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 1425:16:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 1399:02:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 1259:02:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 1235:02:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 336:14:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC) 317:22:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 294:07:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 270:22:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 1578: 1318:and other apps/platforms, 614:Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast 566:Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast 1023:Template:WikiProject Film 575: 573: 225:20:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 204:19:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 166:15:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC) 141:19:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 117:20:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC) 1271:Template:Web syndication 662:Opt-out of notifications 618:Continuing initiatives: 731:Consensus Before Change 630:Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): 626:BLM/Anti-discrimination 1334:. I also noticed that 737:Stephen Fry's Podgrams 645:Join the conversation: 583: 1530:Podcasting articles. 1322:and other genres, or 790:Template:Cite podcast 648:Women in Red talkpage 582: 438:Welcome to Night Vale 42:of past discussions. 1017:Talk:Coraline (film) 1509:Night Vale Presents 430:The NoSleep Podcast 324:The Magnus Archives 1413:"template section" 1328:This American Life 1269:I've noticed that 1107:The Adventure Zone 638:Virtual Ideas Cafe 584: 422:The Adventure Zone 256:or just go on the 1445: 1433: 1396: 1384: 1306: 1294: 1256: 1244: 1240:A worthy choice! 826: 814: 714: 713: 597: 305:article talk page 143: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1569: 1513: 1507: 1503: 1497: 1482: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1462: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1440: 1431: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1391: 1382: 1354: 1348: 1343: 1337: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1301: 1292: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1242: 1019:what you mean? 973: 967: 827: 824: 823: 821: 812: 805: 799: 706: 695: 684: 673: 595: 571: 570: 426:Full Body Chills 377: 314: 312: 283: 248: 214: 189: 176: 155: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1511: 1505: 1501: 1495: 1480: 1474: 1470: 1468:Web syndication 1464: 1456: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1387: 1385: 1381: 1374:Google Podcasts 1352: 1346: 1341: 1335: 1316:Google Podcasts 1297: 1295: 1291: 1267: 1247: 1245: 1241: 1223: 1111: 1011:ratings that I 971: 965: 852: 817: 815: 811: 803: 797: 794: 733: 590: 561:wp:Women in Red 559:This November, 557: 522:Scared to Death 518:Hank the Cowdog 442:Scared to Death 418:Hank the Cowdog 371: 310: 308: 277: 258:Talk:Ear Hustle 238: 208: 183: 170: 149: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1575: 1573: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1320:Horror podcast 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1227:starsandwhales 1222: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1197:starsandwhales 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1136: 1135: 1125:starsandwhales 1110: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1070: 1069: 1038: 1037: 1020: 988: 987: 946: 945: 944: 943: 898: 897: 851: 848: 847: 846: 793: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 758:starsandwhales 732: 729: 712: 711: 665: 664: 653:Stay in touch: 651: 650: 643: 641: 640: 634: 628: 616: 601:Online events: 599: 586: 576: 574: 556: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 544:TimDWilliamson 510:Starsandwhales 495:starsandwhales 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 454:starsandwhales 405:TimDWilliamson 390:starsandwhales 381:TimDWilliamson 374:Starsandwhales 359:starsandwhales 328:starsandwhales 311:Rhododendrites 297: 296: 254: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 124: 123: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1574: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532:TipsyElephant 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1510: 1500: 1492: 1486: 1479: 1469: 1460: 1459:TipsyElephant 1455: 1449: 1441: 1439: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1417:TipsyElephant 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1392: 1390: 1379: 1378:99% Invisible 1375: 1371: 1370:TipsyElephant 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357:TipsyElephant 1351: 1340: 1333: 1332:99% Invisible 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1302: 1300: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276:TipsyElephant 1272: 1264: 1260: 1252: 1250: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1220: 1219:99% Invisible 1216: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1075:TipsyElephant 1068: 1064: 1060: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043:TipsyElephant 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 993:TipsyElephant 986: 982: 978: 970: 963: 962: 961: 960: 956: 952: 951:TipsyElephant 942: 938: 934: 933:TipsyElephant 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 915: 914: 913: 912: 908: 904: 903:TipsyElephant 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 875: 874: 873: 872: 868: 864: 863:TipsyElephant 860: 855: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836:TipsyElephant 833: 832: 831: 830: 822: 820: 809: 802: 791: 788: 782: 778: 774: 773:TipsyElephant 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 754: 753: 752: 751: 747: 743: 742:TipsyElephant 738: 730: 728: 727: 723: 719: 710: 709: 705: 701: 698: 694: 690: 687: 683: 679: 676: 672: 668: 667:Social media: 663: 660: 657: 654: 649: 646: 639: 635: 633: 632:Women in Asia 629: 627: 624: 621: 617: 615: 612: 609: 605: 604: 603: 602: 594: 591: 589: 581: 577: 572: 569: 567: 562: 554: 548: 545: 541: 540: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506: 505: 504: 500: 496: 478: 474: 470: 469:TipsyElephant 465: 464: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 410: 409: 406: 401: 400: 399: 395: 391: 387: 386: 385: 382: 375: 370: 369: 368: 364: 360: 355: 354: 353: 352: 348: 344: 343:TipsyElephant 338: 337: 333: 329: 325: 319: 318: 313: 306: 302: 295: 292: 291: 288: 281: 274: 273: 272: 271: 267: 263: 259: 252: 246: 245:TipsyElephant 242: 241:Mukilteoedits 226: 222: 218: 212: 211:TipsyElephant 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 187: 186:TipsyElephant 182: 181: 179: 174: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 153: 152:TipsyElephant 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 142: 138: 134: 130: 129:TipsyElephant 121: 120: 119: 118: 114: 110: 109:TipsyElephant 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1499:Gimlet Media 1489:For further 1488: 1437: 1388: 1298: 1268: 1248: 1224: 1071: 1039: 1012: 989: 947: 899: 856: 853: 818: 801:Cite podcast 795: 792:improvements 734: 715: 699: 688: 677: 666: 658: 652: 644: 642: 622: 610: 608:Textile arts 600: 598: 592: 588:Women in Red 585: 558: 491: 339: 320: 298: 287:Usedtobecool 285: 237: 125: 106: 75: 43: 37: 1350:Aggregators 620:#1day1woman 526:Six Minutes 514:Dirty Diana 446:Six Minutes 414:Dirty Diana 280:former TAFI 36:This is an 1478:Podcasting 1339:Podcasting 806:. It's at 434:Blood Ties 301:Ear Hustle 178:Ear hustle 95:ArchiveĀ 10 1491:WP:NAVBOX 859:WP:ASSESS 697:Pinterest 686:Instagram 87:ArchiveĀ 6 82:ArchiveĀ 5 76:ArchiveĀ 4 70:ArchiveĀ 3 65:ArchiveĀ 2 60:ArchiveĀ 1 1411:and the 1121:Marlslee 675:Facebook 217:Mukedits 137:contribs 718:Ipigott 708:Twitter 260:page. - 39:archive 1170:ERAGON 1148:ERAGON 1117:ERAGON 450:Creepy 448:, and 192:WP:AFD 1013:think 606:New: 16:< 1550:talk 1546:2pou 1536:talk 1520:talk 1516:2pou 1504:and 1438:Sdkb 1432:{{u| 1421:talk 1405:Sdkb 1389:Sdkb 1383:{{u| 1361:talk 1299:Sdkb 1293:{{u| 1280:talk 1249:Sdkb 1243:{{u| 1231:talk 1201:talk 1174:talk 1152:talk 1129:talk 1119:and 1095:talk 1091:2pou 1079:talk 1063:talk 1059:2pou 1047:talk 1031:talk 1027:2pou 1008:Film 997:talk 981:talk 977:2pou 955:talk 937:talk 922:talk 918:2pou 907:talk 891:talk 887:2pou 867:talk 840:talk 819:Sdkb 813:{{u| 777:talk 762:talk 746:talk 722:talk 534:talk 530:2pou 528:). - 499:talk 473:talk 458:talk 394:talk 363:talk 347:talk 332:talk 266:talk 262:2pou 243:and 221:talk 200:talk 196:2pou 173:2pou 162:talk 158:2pou 133:talk 113:talk 1330:or 1324:RSS 1025:. - 969:CS1 315:\\ 127:ā€” 1552:) 1538:) 1522:) 1512:}} 1506:{{ 1502:}} 1496:{{ 1481:}} 1475:{{ 1471:}} 1465:{{ 1444:}} 1423:) 1395:}} 1363:) 1353:}} 1347:{{ 1342:}} 1336:{{ 1305:}} 1282:) 1255:}} 1233:) 1203:) 1176:) 1154:) 1131:) 1097:) 1081:) 1065:) 1049:) 1033:) 999:) 983:) 972:}} 966:{{ 957:) 939:) 924:) 909:) 893:) 869:) 842:) 825:}} 804:}} 798:{{ 779:) 764:) 748:) 724:) 716:-- 536:) 524:, 520:, 516:, 501:) 475:) 460:) 444:, 440:, 436:, 432:, 428:, 424:, 420:, 416:, 396:) 365:) 349:) 334:) 290:ā˜Žļø 282:}} 278:{{ 268:) 223:) 202:) 164:) 139:) 135:ā€¢ 115:) 91:ā†’ 1548:( 1534:( 1518:( 1461:: 1457:@ 1419:( 1359:( 1278:( 1229:( 1221:! 1199:( 1172:( 1150:( 1127:( 1109:! 1093:( 1077:( 1061:( 1057:- 1045:( 1029:( 995:( 979:( 975:- 953:( 935:( 920:( 905:( 889:( 865:( 838:( 775:( 760:( 744:( 720:( 700:| 689:| 678:| 659:| 623:| 611:| 593:| 532:( 497:( 471:( 456:( 392:( 376:: 372:@ 361:( 345:( 330:( 264:( 253:. 247:: 239:@ 219:( 213:: 209:@ 198:( 188:: 184:@ 175:: 171:@ 160:( 154:: 150:@ 131:( 111:( 50:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Podcasting
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 1
ArchiveĀ 2
ArchiveĀ 3
ArchiveĀ 4
ArchiveĀ 5
ArchiveĀ 6
ArchiveĀ 10
TipsyElephant
talk
20:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
TipsyElephant
talk
contribs
19:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
TipsyElephant
2pou
talk
15:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
2pou
Ear hustle
TipsyElephant
WP:AFD
2pou
talk
19:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
TipsyElephant
Mukedits

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘