388:== Overview == == ?Examples? == A section to provide the non-technical public with examples of the distribution and its use. Would such a section be useful and possible to create? == History == == Specification of the normal distribution == === Probability density function === === Cumulative distribution function === === Generating functions === ==== Moment generating function ==== ==== Characteristic function ==== == Properties == === Moments === === Generating normal random variables === === The central limit theorem === === Infinite divisibility === === Standard deviation === ==Related distributions== === ?Generalizations of the distribution? === This section would present and link to distributions which are more general forms of the distribution presented on the page. For the exponential, this would include the Erlang and Gamma. For the Gamma this would include the several "generalized gamma". == Occurrence == === E.g. 1 === === E.g. 2 === == Estimation of parameters == === Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters === === Unbiased estimation of parameters === === Bayesian estimation of parameters === == See also == == References== == External links ==
1197:
example that led me here is Zipf's law-- which does need an exact discussion, but also needs enough of a discussion that its relationship to the other bibliometric distributions can be understood. It is possible to write at such a level--I mention the papers of
Stephen J Bensman in JASIST and elsewhere. These explanations could be written by two different groups of people--those like myself, who may get it wrong but know what the audience can hope to understand, o people like those on the project here. If they can write them for us to use, or write the first part of the article in a way we can use, I think it would be better than the alternative (to avoid conflict with the articles here, they'd have different names as sees to be frequently done--seee
1201:.) I ask for advice and opinion. I think previous conventional encyclopedias have not done this very well, and we might hope for better. (my mental model is the parallel probability and statistics courses given at universities aimed at different audiences. In terms of the needs of my subject field, if the mathematicians can not teach or write so the library students will cunderstand, the librarians teach the subject themselves. -- I've been doing just that, and it make me uncomfortable because I am aware I do not know enough.
1293:
have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in
January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at
1701:
148:
1274:
consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
1257:. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at
1667:
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on
Knowledge struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for
198:
We generally have to go with what's most common in the relevant literature. If there are several equally common alternatives, I'm generally in favor of preserving the case of any conventional piece of notation that the distribution may be named for. I personally write "Gamma distribution", and "Beta
1196:
Some knowledge of probability occurrs in many fields, and some reference to it in many articles. The articles have to explain what they are talking about in terms that are both comprehensible to the reader of that article, and also accurate within the limits of what those readers can comprehend. The
1621:
I have followed the advice given for attemting to reactivate a project, by reducing the old content of the project page. I have also copied across some of the useful content from the
Statistics project page. There was (and still is, but now on a subpage) some useful material on structuring articles
1292:
proposal for an appreciation week to end on
Knowledge Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who
1051:
I don't have strong feelings either way when it comes to pipe vs. semicolon. I'd like to point out, though, that the pipe seems to be more widely used on
Knowledge already, so it would be less work to standardize on pipes. However, since you seem to be prepared to make all those changes, I won't
1273:
are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please
1192:
As a nonspecialist who nonetheless uses bibliometric and other probability distributions, I suggest that "An important note is that WikiProject
Probability is not concerned with writing articles for an audience who is trying to learn probability theory, except as is appropriate for encyclopedic
1716:
is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating
789:
Ok, after thinking about it, I like the third choice. Its similarity to the continuous notation is a plus, and rational number subscripts in the first choice worry me even though they are countable. The second is worse because it is hard to specify a particular instance using a real number as a
391:
We need to make sure that we give enough background in the lead paragraphs and in the first couple of sections. I seem to recall that "Overview" sections are deprecated and that a summary and/or high-level overview should go into the lead paragraph (before the first section heading).
1384:
Frankly, I think that argument disregards the actual intended purpose of the process, which is to serve the interest of improving
Knowledge. Punishing the math community for not helping originally but forbidding it to help later is being made the purpose of the process instead.
1052:
stop you. ;-) If you do make any changes, maybe point to this discussion in your edit summary. Since these conventions and guidelines are all very recent, people may not be aware of them, or may want to voice an opinion, plus it's a good chance to get more editors involved. --
1405:
1399:
999:
I tend to do the opposite: The primary separator for me is the pipe, and I use semicolons pretty much like commas, except that they suggest some sort of grouping. I think the rationale for the pipe is that everything to its left jointly sums/integrates to unity.
1021:
At first I had no preference between the semicolon and the bar, but I have looked it up in my main two books, "Data
Reduction..." by Bevington and Robinson, and "Statistical Theory" by Lindgren. Both use the semicolon, Lindgren uses f(x;a,b,c), Bevington uses
1193:
articles. Writing content with a primarily pedagogical intent is the province of
Wikibooks. However, in time WikiProject Probability may develop into a project to write a Wikibook on the subject" might be a little elitist, depending on the interpretation.
207:-distribution"; "Cauchy distribution", "Wishart distribution" (based on proper names); "binomial distribution", "exponential distribution" (not based on proper names). I tend to hesitate when it comes to "normal distribution" vs. "Normal distribution". --
173:
This section includes the discussion of the specification to help authors write the entries on the distributions while maintain a maximum amount of harmony between the different distributions. The actual specification will be presented on the main page.
1379:
The predominant argument for endorsing deletion, as nearly as I can tell, is that since Knowledge's math community irresponsibly neglected to offer its assistance in the deliberations originally, it should be punished by being forbidden to help later.
1465:
a bit, or at least put in an example? I'm coming across it in medical studies and the article here is too mathematically dense to parse properly - it delves into limit equations without taking the time to explain what the ratio itself actually means.
187:
We should decide on whether to capitize the names of the distributions when we refer to them in passing. e.g Do we talk about the Gamma distribution or the gamma distribution. I have been using capitalizations because it seems like a proper name.
1668:
the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please
1297:
where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.
1319:
1133:
A reader has sent an e-mail to the Wikimedia help desk raising concerns about this article and has left a message at the bottom of the discussion page explaining his reasons. I would be grateful if someone could have a look at
281:
That's a complex issue. I'd say what you did was perfectly fine for inline math. If you prefer TeX's Computer Modern typeface for all math formulas, you can switch on mandatory PNG rendering in your user preferences.
199:
distribution", but "chi-squared distribution" and "zeta distribution", because the first two involve upper-case Greek letters and the last two lower-case Greek letters. For other distributions it's pretty clear: "
1369:
321:
as our prototype of the continuous because it's the most complete and elegant page currently and possibly the most important distribution overall certainly it has the most text both here and on mathworld.
773:
1070:
At this point, I just think some standard notation should be used. For the most part, any choice in notation is arbitrary. If it jives with book A & B but not C & D, then so be it...
668:
524:
1445:
By my quick count, 17 "keep", 25 "delete" so far, plus various gradations such as "trim" or "merge" or "trim and merge", etc. Anyone with an opinion should speak up now before this closes.
39:
335:, since it includes a discussion of Bayesian estimation. A discussion of (semi-)conjugate priors for the normal mean and variance/precision is currently missing from the article on the
982:
939:
896:
853:
710:
269:
604:
460:
1721:! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
118:
295:
We had a discussion on this, but I can't remember the page. (MarkSweep, do you remember the page?) I've tried to summarize the results in the section on inline math.
553:
1171:
1261:, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding
775:
This is exactly the same as the conventions currently used for continuous distributions, and it has the advantage that several parameters are easily accommodated.
363:
I think that the talk page is for carrying on a discussion and the project page is for laying out an editable list of specifications - MarkSweep, is that right?
670:
There are plenty of precedents for writing function parameters as subscripts, but the disadvantage is that this may become hard to read with several parameters.
1340:
353:
This section should be a working space for hashing out ideas on the layout and the specification on the previous page can be used when we have concensus.
1336:
1315:
74:
1294:
1254:
1622:
on probability distribution articles. Would this be better elsewhere? I hope others will join in this effort to improve the Probability project.
1404:
The long process continues. Now it is necessary for everyone who has an opinion on whether the article should be kept, to post their views at
1106:
406:
As I see it, there are basically three choices of notation for discrete probability mass functions. Consider a one-parameter family like the
80:
1565:
1167:
1081:
1339:
was deleted in an irregular way when this WikiProject had not been notified of the proposal for deletion. Please express opinions here:
1680:(Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.)
1728:
1170:, which is looking to identify quality articles in Knowledge for future publication on CD or paper. We recently began assessing using
1088:
1270:
1266:
376:
It doesn't matter much to me: We can have a discussion about the specification first, and then move it to the project page later. --
24:
1262:
1499:
1481:
814:
I also prefer the third option with a caveat. I use pipe's to denote conditionals and semi-colons to denote parameters. So
20:
1710:
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that
69:
1178:, with no POV or copyright problems. Can you recommend any suitable articles? Please post your suggestions here. Cheers,
159:
1599:
715:
245:
A question: how do we add inline math so it's elegant? I've tried adding it with 'math' tags but it looks goofy: e.g.
60:
609:
465:
1756:
1582:
1488:
113:
1113:
127:
1645:
332:
225:
1670:
1372:. So far 16 favor "relisting" the article, which could result in restoring it, and 16 endorse its deletion.
1148:
1718:
1712:
1700:
1607:
1543:
1495:
1362:
1358:
1138:
1141:
1674:
and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my
1275:
1557:
1258:
944:
901:
858:
817:
1220:
1727:
To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to
1638:
1534:
I disagree. I'll be back to argue the point later. I think this sort of thing should fit in with
1289:
336:
318:
50:
1653:
1627:
1603:
1539:
1446:
1433:
1386:
1344:
1323:
1299:
1126:
567:
221:
132:
90:
65:
1742:
1690:
1657:
1631:
1611:
1588:
1547:
1511:
1470:
1449:
1436:
1389:
1347:
1326:
1302:
1278:
1236:
1224:
1205:
1182:
1155:
1120:
1095:
1056:
1030:
1004:
805:
794:
783:
396:
380:
367:
357:
343:
326:
299:
286:
275:
232:
211:
192:
680:
1535:
1406:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture (second nomination)
1400:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture (second nomination)
1250:
779:
The problem with options 1 and 2 is that they are easy to confuse. Option 3 is unambiguous. --
407:
248:
46:
573:
429:
131:
129:
1738:
1686:
1675:
1216:
1198:
529:
1109:, any suggestions as to how to better integrate it into the other pages on this topic ?
1579:
1561:
1507:
1117:
1053:
1001:
780:
674:
393:
377:
340:
283:
208:
1341:
Knowledge:Deletion_review/Log/2007_August_6#Infinite_monkey_theorem_in_popular_culture
1750:
1649:
1623:
1071:
985:
1717:
easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested,
1462:
1455:
1175:
354:
323:
272:
189:
1026:(x;a,b,c). The bottom line is, I now favor the semicolon with f and F or p and P.
1467:
1179:
1734:
1682:
898:
because it's entirely possible to have a conditional with parameters (such as
1571:
1503:
1602:. I could use work both on itself and on links to it from other articles.
1731:. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
1320:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture
1232:
apparently not, for my request for assistance (above) was not replied to.
1288:
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of
1233:
1202:
1152:
1092:
1027:
802:
791:
423:
364:
296:
229:
1498:. To keep all the conversation in one place, please post comments at
1494:, which has grown too large. For the moment the draft version is at
1370:
Knowledge:Deletion review/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture
1353:
Will "infinite monkey theorem in popular culture" ever get restored
555:
can thought of as column vector (or even a stochastic matrix), and
141:
133:
15:
1318:
has been nominated for deletion. Please express opinions at
402:
Specification of the distribution: Notation for discrete PMFs
1699:
1215:
Things seem kind of quiet around here, is anybody active? --
1147:
The article is fine, the reader is confused. I answered in
1560:
is being considered for featured quality status, at the
1484:
I've drafted a revised navigational template to replace
1116:- having a glossary makes things easier to understand.
984:, though I only recall doing such for Bayesian stuff).
98:
1566:
Knowledge:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Statistics
1368:
The discussion is continuing, and it's been moved to
947:
904:
861:
820:
718:
683:
612:
576:
532:
468:
432:
251:
1087:
Hello, Please notice this project. I hope that the
1648:may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1091:
will be adopted by the probability project. Thanks,
566:Unary function notation (advocated, apparently, by
1428:for this reason and this reason and this reason...
1415:for this reason and this reason and this reason...
976:
933:
890:
847:
767:
704:
662:
598:
547:
518:
454:
263:
768:{\displaystyle (\forall s)\sum _{k}f(k\mid s)=1.}
1553:Statistics portal at Featured portal candidates
1174:, and we are looking for A-class, B-class, and
663:{\displaystyle (\forall s)\sum _{k}f_{s}(k)=1.}
519:{\displaystyle (\forall s)\sum _{k}f_{k}(s)=1.}
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
801:I made these changes, just to keep up to date.
331:I'd additionally recommend the article on the
8:
313:Prototype Layouts and Contents for Reference
1564:process. Comments would be appreciated at
1337:Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture
1316:Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture
1309:Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture
1644:The proposed renaming being discussed at
1598:I've just written a short article titled
1482:Template talk:ProbDistributions#Too large
1295:User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week
957:
946:
920:
903:
871:
860:
819:
735:
717:
682:
639:
629:
611:
581:
575:
531:
495:
485:
467:
437:
431:
250:
158:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
673:General function notation (advocated by
422:Vector notation (advocated initially by
1646:Talk:Copula (statistics)#Requested move
1408:. Click on that link and write either
1255:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Directory
1637:Renaming discussion regarding article
1162:Articles for the Knowledge 1.0 project
1107:Glossary of probability and statistics
790:subscript and they are not countable.
526:I call this "vector notation" because
1663:Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
1395:infinite monkey process continues....
7:
1168:Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
147:
145:
1529:- should be done with <math: -->
1729:Knowledge:WikiProject X/Newsletter
1089:List of publications in statistics
722:
616:
472:
308:Specification of a Standard Layout
14:
977:{\displaystyle N(x|\mu ;\sigma )}
934:{\displaystyle N(x;\sigma |\mu )}
891:{\displaystyle N(x|\mu ,\sigma )}
848:{\displaystyle N(x;\mu ,\sigma )}
677:) would write the probability as
570:) would write the probability as
426:) would write the probability as
178:Specifications of Standard Usage
146:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
1500:Template talk:ProbDistributions
1522:I was surprised to read this:
1237:02:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
1225:23:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1206:08:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1121:15:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1096:06:51, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
971:
958:
951:
928:
921:
908:
885:
872:
865:
842:
824:
756:
744:
728:
719:
699:
687:
651:
645:
622:
613:
593:
587:
542:
536:
507:
501:
478:
469:
449:
443:
258:
255:
1:
1512:15:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
1476:Revised navigational template
1461:Could a statistician clarify
1303:18:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
1211:Is this project still active?
1156:16:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
1142:09:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
1074:22:10, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
37:Put new text under old text.
1743:16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
1471:12:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
1279:00:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
1114:WikiProject:General Audience
1112:I'm also interested for the
988:20:33, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
563:th component of that vector.
410:, whose parameter is called
1691:22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1678:. Thank you for your time!
1612:18:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
1548:16:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
1450:22:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
1437:04:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
1390:05:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
1057:02:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
1031:21:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
1005:21:12, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
806:09:15, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
795:18:32, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
784:17:59, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
397:21:06, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
381:21:06, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
368:12:20, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
358:07:05, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
344:08:45, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
327:07:57, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
300:09:14, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
287:08:57, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
276:08:01, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
233:09:14, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
212:08:55, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
193:07:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1773:
1658:08:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
1562:Featured portal candidates
1348:22:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
1327:05:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
705:{\displaystyle f(k\mid s)}
88:
1632:15:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
1480:After some discussion at
1253:has recently updated the
1183:20:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
264:{\displaystyle \gamma ()}
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
1671:review the proposal here
1589:01:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
1166:Hi, I'm a member of the
599:{\displaystyle f_{s}(k)}
455:{\displaystyle f_{k}(s)}
333:exponential distribution
226:chi-squared distribution
220:Yes - see talk pages on
1600:Bhatia–Davis inequality
1594:Bhatia–Davis inequality
1363:infinite monkey theorem
1359:infinite monkey theorem
1125:
25:WikiProject Probability
1704:
1696:WikiProject X is live!
1617:Attempt to re-activate
1496:User:Qwfp/tempprobdist
1311:nominated for deletion
1149:Talk:Gambler's fallacy
978:
935:
892:
849:
769:
706:
664:
600:
549:
520:
456:
418:as the main argument:
317:I'd suggest using the
265:
70:avoid personal attacks
1703:
1365:in popular culture.)
979:
936:
893:
850:
770:
707:
665:
601:
550:
521:
457:
266:
1284:Knowledge Day Awards
945:
902:
859:
818:
716:
681:
610:
574:
548:{\displaystyle f(s)}
530:
466:
430:
249:
1639:Copula (statistics)
1518:Inline "math" tags?
1251:WikiProject Council
337:normal distribution
319:Normal distribution
1705:
1502:not here. Thanks,
1139:Capitalistroadster
974:
931:
888:
845:
765:
740:
702:
660:
634:
596:
545:
516:
490:
452:
261:
222:Gamma distribution
160:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
1757:NA-Class articles
1681:
1558:Portal:Statistics
1489:ProbDistributions
1332:Please opine here
1245:Project directory
1127:Gambler's fallacy
731:
625:
481:
408:Zeta distribution
203:-distribution", "
166:
165:
140:
139:
61:Assume good faith
38:
1764:
1707:Hello everyone!
1679:
1574:
1493:
1487:
1259:User:B2T2/Portal
983:
981:
980:
975:
961:
940:
938:
937:
932:
924:
897:
895:
894:
889:
875:
854:
852:
851:
846:
774:
772:
771:
766:
739:
711:
709:
708:
703:
669:
667:
666:
661:
644:
643:
633:
605:
603:
602:
597:
586:
585:
554:
552:
551:
546:
525:
523:
522:
517:
500:
499:
489:
461:
459:
458:
453:
442:
441:
414:. We try to use
270:
268:
267:
262:
151:
150:
149:
142:
134:
101:
16:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1747:
1746:
1698:
1665:
1642:
1619:
1596:
1585:
1572:
1555:
1520:
1491:
1485:
1478:
1459:
1397:
1355:
1334:
1313:
1286:
1247:
1213:
1190:
1164:
1130:
1103:
1085:
1025:
943:
942:
900:
899:
857:
856:
816:
815:
714:
713:
679:
678:
635:
608:
607:
577:
572:
571:
528:
527:
491:
464:
463:
433:
428:
427:
404:
389:
351:
315:
310:
247:
246:
243:
185:
180:
171:
136:
135:
130:
107:
106:
105:
104:
97:
93:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
1770:
1768:
1760:
1759:
1749:
1748:
1697:
1694:
1664:
1661:
1641:
1635:
1618:
1615:
1595:
1592:
1583:
1554:
1551:
1532:
1531:
1519:
1516:
1477:
1474:
1458:
1453:
1440:
1439:
1430:
1429:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1396:
1393:
1377:
1376:
1354:
1351:
1333:
1330:
1312:
1306:
1285:
1282:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1212:
1209:
1199:Bradford's law
1189:
1186:
1172:these criteria
1163:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1136:
1135:
1129:
1124:
1102:
1099:
1084:
1082:Science pearls
1079:
1077:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1023:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
992:
991:
990:
989:
973:
970:
967:
964:
960:
956:
953:
950:
930:
927:
923:
919:
916:
913:
910:
907:
887:
884:
881:
878:
874:
870:
867:
864:
844:
841:
838:
835:
832:
829:
826:
823:
809:
808:
798:
797:
777:
776:
764:
761:
758:
755:
752:
749:
746:
743:
738:
734:
730:
727:
724:
721:
701:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
671:
659:
656:
653:
650:
647:
642:
638:
632:
628:
624:
621:
618:
615:
595:
592:
589:
584:
580:
564:
544:
541:
538:
535:
515:
512:
509:
506:
503:
498:
494:
488:
484:
480:
477:
474:
471:
451:
448:
445:
440:
436:
403:
400:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
371:
370:
350:
349:Working Layout
347:
314:
311:
309:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
290:
289:
260:
257:
254:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
215:
214:
184:
183:Capitalization
181:
179:
176:
170:
167:
164:
163:
152:
138:
137:
128:
126:
125:
122:
121:
109:
108:
103:
102:
94:
89:
87:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1769:
1758:
1755:
1754:
1752:
1745:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1713:WikiProject X
1708:
1702:
1695:
1693:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1662:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1640:
1636:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1616:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1604:Michael Hardy
1601:
1593:
1591:
1590:
1586:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1552:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1540:Michael Hardy
1537:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1517:
1515:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1490:
1483:
1475:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1464:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1447:Michael Hardy
1444:
1438:
1435:
1434:Michael Hardy
1432:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1387:Michael Hardy
1383:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1371:
1366:
1364:
1360:
1352:
1350:
1349:
1346:
1345:Michael Hardy
1342:
1338:
1331:
1329:
1328:
1325:
1324:Michael Hardy
1321:
1317:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1300:Badbilltucker
1296:
1291:
1283:
1281:
1280:
1277:
1272:
1271:collaboration
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1244:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1210:
1208:
1207:
1204:
1200:
1194:
1187:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1176:Good articles
1173:
1169:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1110:
1108:
1100:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1090:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1073:
1058:
1055:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1032:
1029:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1006:
1003:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
987:
968:
965:
962:
954:
948:
925:
917:
914:
911:
905:
882:
879:
876:
868:
862:
839:
836:
833:
830:
827:
821:
813:
812:
811:
810:
807:
804:
800:
799:
796:
793:
788:
787:
786:
785:
782:
762:
759:
753:
750:
747:
741:
736:
732:
725:
696:
693:
690:
684:
676:
672:
657:
654:
648:
640:
636:
630:
626:
619:
590:
582:
578:
569:
568:Michael Hardy
565:
562:
558:
539:
533:
513:
510:
504:
496:
492:
486:
482:
475:
446:
438:
434:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
413:
409:
401:
399:
398:
395:
382:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
366:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
348:
346:
345:
342:
338:
334:
329:
328:
325:
320:
312:
307:
301:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
285:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
252:
240:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
213:
210:
206:
202:
197:
196:
195:
194:
191:
182:
177:
175:
169:Specification
168:
161:
157:
153:
144:
143:
124:
123:
120:
117:
115:
111:
110:
100:
96:
95:
92:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1733:
1724:
1723:
1719:check us out
1711:
1709:
1706:
1669:
1666:
1643:
1620:
1597:
1570:
1569:
1556:
1533:
1527:In-line math
1526:
1521:
1479:
1463:hazard ratio
1460:
1456:Hazard ratio
1442:
1441:
1425:
1412:
1403:
1398:
1381:
1378:
1367:
1356:
1335:
1314:
1308:
1287:
1248:
1214:
1195:
1191:
1165:
1137:
1111:
1104:
1086:
1076:
1069:
778:
560:
559:indexes the
556:
415:
411:
405:
390:
352:
330:
316:
244:
204:
200:
186:
172:
156:project page
155:
112:
19:This is the
1290:Esperanza's
1267:peer review
1249:Hello. The
855:instead of
675:yours truly
241:Inline math
1536:WP:MOSMATH
1263:assessment
1217:Salix alba
1676:talk page
1188:as a user
1118:Flammifer
1105:I made a
1054:MarkSweep
1002:MarkSweep
781:MarkSweep
394:MarkSweep
378:MarkSweep
341:MarkSweep
284:MarkSweep
209:MarkSweep
99:WT:PROBAB
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
1751:Category
1650:Favonian
1624:Melcombe
1101:Glossary
1072:Cburnett
986:Cburnett
114:Archives
91:Shortcut
51:get help
1443:Update:
355:Acuster
324:Acuster
273:Acuster
190:Acuster
1468:Firien
1426:Delete
1269:, and
1180:Shanel
162:scale.
1735:Harej
1725:Note:
1683:Harej
1587:: -->
1530:tags.
1357:(See
712:with
606:with
462:with
154:This
79:Seek
1739:talk
1687:talk
1654:talk
1628:talk
1608:talk
1578:<
1573:G716
1544:talk
1508:talk
1504:Qwfp
1413:Keep
1382:POV:
1361:and
1276:B2T2
1221:talk
339:. --
224:and
68:and
1568:. —
1234:DGG
1203:DGG
1153:PAR
1134:it.
1093:APH
1028:PAR
941:or
803:PAR
792:PAR
424:PAR
365:PAR
297:PAR
230:PAR
1753::
1741:)
1689:)
1656:)
1630:)
1610:)
1546:)
1538:.
1514:.
1510:)
1492:}}
1486:{{
1466:--
1420:or
1343:.
1322:.
1265:,
1223:)
1151:.
1000:--
969:σ
963:μ
926:μ
918:σ
883:σ
877:μ
840:σ
834:μ
763:1.
751:∣
733:∑
723:∀
694:∣
658:1.
627:∑
617:∀
514:1.
483:∑
473:∀
392:--
282:--
271:.
253:γ
228:.
49:;
1737:(
1685:(
1652:(
1626:(
1606:(
1584:C
1581:·
1542:(
1506:(
1219:(
1024:B
1022:P
972:)
966:;
959:|
955:x
952:(
949:N
929:)
922:|
915:;
912:x
909:(
906:N
886:)
880:,
873:|
869:x
866:(
863:N
843:)
837:,
831:;
828:x
825:(
822:N
760:=
757:)
754:s
748:k
745:(
742:f
737:k
729:)
726:s
720:(
700:)
697:s
691:k
688:(
685:f
655:=
652:)
649:k
646:(
641:s
637:f
631:k
623:)
620:s
614:(
594:)
591:k
588:(
583:s
579:f
561:k
557:k
543:)
540:s
537:(
534:f
511:=
508:)
505:s
502:(
497:k
493:f
487:k
479:)
476:s
470:(
450:)
447:s
444:(
439:k
435:f
416:k
412:s
259:)
256:(
205:t
201:F
119:1
116::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.