22:
263:
432:
Talk page
Project Status kept saying "Inactive" after I had changed the status to what you have now reverted to. It all looks fine now, but as you say, lots of work to do finding other editors to collaborate and un-red-linking everything. Hard to understand why a composer as notable as this fell into
455:
Hi Chris, I'm curious what your goals are with this reactivation. If you're not aware, WikiProjects are not what they were 10 years ago. Some are rather dormant and serve as casual meeting places for interested editors, and most are completely ignored even if outwardly considered "active". There are
480:
During the reactivation process, I saw a great many
Articles and Categories had listed it on their Talk Pages, so I wasn’t sure whether deactivation was justified. I accept what you say about their decline in popularity over the past decade, but I have participated in other WikiProjects that are
513:, you'll see no conversations since 2015 that included more than one person. The articles and categories remain in a project's scope/categorization, regardless of whether the project is active or not. They were put there when it was active and they essentially remain there forever.
484:
After reactivation, my next step is now to ask inactive editors if they want to become active again, as they may not even be aware they had been moved to the
Inactive list. If enough say yes, we may see some discussion and plans for new articles, or revision of existing
506:, but this has me confused. All WikiProjects are created by interested editors, it just so happened that there were enough at one point (since gone) to create one for Wagner. Notice how there are no WikiProjects on Beethoven, Mozart, Tchaikovsky, Schubert etc.
537:
site and wanted to get feedback from others from this project who had worked on Wagner-related projects in the past, so was surprised to see it deactivated. I have reactivated it, to see what happens. If it dies, it dies, but not for the lack of trying.
476:
Thanks for promptly replying. I was surprised to see a WikiProject for such a notable composer as
Richard Wagner showing as ‘inactive’, so I went to the WikiProject page to discover it laying dormant after having appparently been quite
410:
and I restored the project page to the version where you had successfully activated the WikiProject - Step #11 of WP:REVIVE. Still, to complete the revival, there appears to be a good quantity of work to do. I wish you luck.
390:- I've done it. That reveals a bunch of requests for additional work that WikiProjects administration seems to expect. I'm going to have to track down what you thought you did. It doesn't sound right.
193:
and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
488:
If you would like to participate, you or I can move your name into the active list; alternatively you could also delete yourself from the
Inactive list if you don’t want to be approached again.
510:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
310:
456:
only a handful truly active and a very small amount that still work together. Unfortunately, without clear and actionable goals, probably little will come of this.
107:
361:
Thanks, I see that is actually in item #10. I copied that text and pasted into the
Project after adding }} to the right of ‘main’. Does that look right now?
244:
338:
282:
509:
Project deactivation occurs when no one in the project is actively contributing towards the project goals. If you look through
240:
221:
205:
303:
72:
201:
93:
387:
182:
543:
504:"I was surprised to see a WikiProject for such a notable composer as Richard Wagner showing as ‘inactive’"
493:
438:
370:
318:
190:
162:
286:
76:
547:
528:
497:
471:
442:
419:
398:
374:
349:
322:
248:
98:
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to
296:
229:
309:
to Active after adding myself as Active
Participant, but it is still showing as ‘inactive’ here:
217:
78:
186:
539:
489:
434:
405:
381:
366:
362:
332:
314:
152:
103:
225:
269:
74:
21:
99:
521:
464:
213:
172:
262:
425:
413:
392:
356:
343:
516:
502:
Chris, I fear you are misunderstanding somethings about WikiProjects. You say
459:
337:
See item #11 under WP:REVIVE. Change "inactive" to "main" in the source for
106:. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the
200:, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at
433:
inactivity. Anyway, thanks for your good wishes, warmly reciprocated.
365:. I can’t see the banner text in the Source to copy to the Talk page.
136:
115:
534:
429:
257:
79:
15:
363:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Richard_Wagner
511:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Richard Wagner/Archive 7
237:
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.
148:
It will work on a variety of links, including those from
481:
quite active, so couldn’t understand what happened here.
274:
124:
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
281:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
311:Talk:International Association of Wagner Societies
272:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
204:. Questions, comments and requests can be made at
428:Thank you! I only tried the other steps when the
8:
108:39th most imported script on Knowledge (XXG)
273:
110:. The idea is that it takes something like
533:I recently made a lot of changes to the
88:User script to detect unreliable sources
7:
339:Template:WikiProject Richard Wagner
198:not a script to be mindlessly used
14:
130:and turns it into something like
261:
20:
181:The script is mostly based on
1:
206:User talk:Headbomb/unreliable
254:Reactivation of this project
285:, or consider visiting the
570:
249:16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
241:MediaWiki message delivery
91:
548:11:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
529:19:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
498:01:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
472:01:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
443:00:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
420:23:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
399:23:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
375:12:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
350:01:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
323:23:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
313:. What am I doing wrong?
202:User:Headbomb/unreliable
122:. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
94:User:Headbomb/unreliable
388:Special:Diff/1229464151
144:. Accessed 2020-02-14.
196:Do note that this is
276:ask another question
304:WikiProject status
104:predatory journals
100:unreliable sources
299:, I have changed
293:
292:
278:on your talk page
137:Article of things
116:Article of things
85:
84:
40:1 (from May 2007)
561:
526:
524:
519:
505:
469:
467:
462:
416:
409:
395:
385:
360:
346:
336:
308:
302:
280:
265:
258:
238:
233:
177:
171:
167:
161:
157:
151:
139:
125:
80:
24:
16:
569:
568:
564:
563:
562:
560:
559:
558:
522:
517:
515:
503:
465:
460:
458:
414:
403:
393:
379:
354:
344:
330:
306:
300:
256:
236:
212:
175:
169:
165:
159:
155:
149:
135:
123:
96:
90:
81:
75:
29:
12:
11:
5:
567:
565:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
507:
486:
482:
478:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
401:
295:After reading
291:
290:
283:user talk page
266:
255:
252:
239:Delivered by:
146:
145:
142:Deprecated.com
128:
127:
120:Deprecated.com
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
73:
71:
68:
67:
35:
34:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
566:
549:
545:
541:
536:
532:
531:
530:
527:
525:
520:
512:
508:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
470:
468:
463:
454:
444:
440:
436:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:
418:
417:
407:
402:
400:
397:
396:
389:
383:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
358:
353:
352:
351:
348:
347:
340:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
305:
298:
288:
284:
279:
277:
271:
267:
264:
260:
259:
253:
251:
250:
246:
242:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
209:
207:
203:
199:
194:
192:
188:
184:
183:WP:RSPSOURCES
179:
174:
164:
154:
143:
138:
133:
132:
131:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
109:
105:
101:
95:
87:
70:
69:
66:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
540:Chrisdevelop
514:
490:Chrisdevelop
457:
435:Chrisdevelop
412:
406:Chrisdevelop
391:
382:Chrisdevelop
367:Chrisdevelop
342:
333:Chrisdevelop
315:Chrisdevelop
294:
275:
270:help request
235:
210:
197:
195:
191:WP:CITEWATCH
180:
163:cite journal
147:
141:
134:John Smith "
129:
119:
114:John Smith "
97:
38:
26:
92:Main page:
297:WP:REVIVE
415:— jmcgnh
394:— jmcgnh
345:— jmcgnh
287:Teahouse
214:Headbomb
187:WP:NPPSG
153:cite web
27:Archives
386:Here -
523:(talk)
466:(talk)
426:Jmcgnh
357:Jmcgnh
518:Aza24
485:ones.
477:busy.
461:Aza24
268:This
544:talk
535:RWVI
494:talk
439:talk
430:RWVI
371:talk
319:talk
245:talk
189:and
168:and
102:and
211:-
173:doi
42:•
546:)
496:)
441:)
373:)
341:.
321:)
307:}}
301:{{
247:)
228:·
224:·
220:·
208:.
185:,
178:.
176:}}
170:{{
166:}}
160:{{
158:,
156:}}
150:{{
140:"
118:"
62:•
58:•
54:•
50:•
46:•
542:(
492:(
437:(
424:@
408::
404:@
384::
380:@
369:(
359::
355:@
335::
331:@
317:(
289:.
243:(
232:}
230:b
226:p
222:c
218:t
216:{
126:)
64:7
60:6
56:5
52:4
48:3
44:2
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
