348:), and 15 others who are not linked. Besides him, this last group includes elected officials, a Pulitzer Prize winner, musicians who played with notable bands, identical twins who skated in Ice Follies, journalists and other media people, all featured in at least one news article. So, any valedictorian who has done something that a reliable source found worthy of note should be included, but not every valedictorian. I just went looking for valedictorians to add to my list, or to put in a separate list, and instead found that Tam discountinued naming valedictorians in 2005--so I'll add that to the article instead.--
2530:. I think it could do with some additional views from people who have been uninvolved up to now. Since this project has a banner on the talk page, it seemed sensible to invite people from this project to comment. Could I politely invite anyone with the time or inclination to read through the dispute and comment on the article's talk page? The article is under full protection at the moment, to stop the edit-warring that was going on with respect to the disputed material, and it could do with being resolved, one way or another, to allow development of the article to proceed. Thanks.
2290:. If a non-descript garage in Silicon Valley was the place where HP began, it might make the list. Same for an otherwise typical adobe house that happens to be the oldest structure in Fremont. Design and execution are not always the issue--for schools, it is frequently based on being the first permanent high school or public school in an area combined with some archictural merit, which may only be that it provides a good example of buildings of a specific historic period more than 50 years ago.--
1779:
can fill in some of the basic stuff in the infobox without obvious sillyness I'm willing to believe they aren't making it up in most cases.) I'd also be willing to let them have a couple of sections about topical subjects, since mostly they will put the topical stuff in anyway. If you think about it, they are in the school for <= 4 years in most cases -- they aren't likely to know a lot of long-term history of the place, and what happened last year
1250:
that use continues to this day. So I'd suggest a single article with a lead section written as if it were a school, mentioning it's listed status, with a UK school infobox, with a discussion on the architectural importance of the building; After all, as is the case with listings, you may get a group of buildings making up a school, with independent buildings being classed as notable, but you may still only have one article on the group, for example
31:
1364:"If a school occupies a listed building it is illogical not to mention the school." - Mention it where? In the article about the notable building, of course, but that doesn't mean that the article about the building can become an article about the school. If the school has no other claim to notability, it isn't notable, the building is. Compare with an individual who owns or occupies a significant building but isn't notable himself/herself.
1172:(by nature of being listed), then there is justification that an article sh/could exist for it; why then should we not cover the school? I'd have thought that notable (school) buildings would have some coverage over why they were built and how they've been used, which sounds distinctly like there would need to be some coverage as a school (even if it is biased more towards its architectural than scholastic merit)? --
911:
1422:
want to tie them to this particular article unless there is very credible and significant coverage from outside sources that links these persons to this institution. In general, I don't think it's at all acceptable to list in any institution's article, including a school's, petty or non-notable criminals unless there is a damn good reason to do so (and simply being verifiable doesn't cut it). --
2801:
the edit summaries. The macro currently seems to be set to include Mr./Mrs./Miss as a title in the infobox. I personally think these titles are unnecessary. If anyone has any strong views on the subject could they please comment on
Ratarsed's talk page so that the parameters can be set in line with the consensus view before any more edits are done.
2663:
verifiable proof of notability rather than trying to delete it. This applies particularly to schools at grade levels that are not assumed to be automatically notable in their country. Some small private elementary schools may not meet notability criteria, but most or all high schools will be able to if an editor is willing to dig for references.
1315:, and if a notability guideline on schools is really needed were brought up in the past and never really resolved, these may come back-up again. Past experience of mine has shown that it is difficult to tell if a guideline is going to get acceptance and compromise will continue until the actual final debate on putting the guideline tag on it.
901:, I think that this one should stay. If there's a Wikiproject on slang, this article would probably be worth a Mid rating. It should have outside references added, which the old boys may not find necessary, since the school has so many internal publications. But, for NPOV editing, there are some available that demonstrate notability:
119:. An IP user has added this repeatedly over the past few months and I have reverted it each time, but I want to ask here about this (as I assume this issue has arisen before). Are valedictorians automatically notable? Should this person be included in the article or not? Please comment on the article's talk page, thanks
1765:
necesarily have a school article start off as a class A article, but rather to have it start off as a self-guiding learning experience. By the time they have filled in some of the school article with the hints on how to do it, they should have an idea where to look and what to do on articles that don't have hints.
344:
the already large and near-GA GGB article, So, I added him to the list of "Notable alumni" in my high school's article. The list now has 31 people with their own articles, 15 with redlinks (of whom at least half should have articles, perhaps more, including several MLB and NFL players and the guy who co-wrote
1202:"...if the building is notable... (by nature of being listed), then there is justification that an article sh/could exist for it" - sure, clearly so. "Why then should we not cover the school?" - Oh, dear. You can only mean 'Why then shouldn't the school have its own separate article as well?' Because if its
276:(the NY Times, USA Today, Time magazine, etc.) had something to say about the glee club president, that might establish notability. But as ElKevbo has noted, the "notability" standard is intended to limit the article population, not the content of those articles, so it doesn't matter in this specific case.
970:. I cannot find any references at all, which would seem unusual for a school that has the Prince of Wales as a patron. I'm just checking here (as I'm no expert on schools) to see if anyone knows where sources can be found, or if it is better known by a different name? I've already tried the links on the
2553:
I've taken a try at reorganizing the
Shortcuts and redirects between this project and the Notability Guideline. Basically, WP:SCHOOLS and its variations are currently directed there and WP:WPSCHOOLS and such are directed here. It's not an ideal solution, but I think it's an alright temporary solution
1855:
should be included in such lists even if they only attended the school the list refers to for a few weeks. It follows that it doesn't work to require "graduation year". The
Project guidance I've linked above says "After a description, state when they graduated or what years they attended. After that,
1756:
There will always be vandalism, and this kind of template won't stop it any more than anything else will. I think a visible "Hint: do it this way" as opposed to HTML comment tags will help in a few cases where someone in a school honestly doesn't realize that his friend isn't notable for winning the
1070:
I thought I would bring to general attention that this proposal is back and active again. The original version has been heavily changed into a new version based on the work of a few editors. If this is passed it will have a rather large impact on this project, though the the talk page documents a lot
343:
I confirmed that there was such a person in the Alumni
Directory and which year he was identified with, but haven't found out much else about him. If there was a separate article about the Bridge's history or the opening ceremonies, I'd mention Miller there. But it doesn't seem important enough for
275:
To answer the original question, status as a high school (or college, for that matter) valedictorian does not automatically confer notability as
Knowledge (XXG) understands "notability". Neither does presidency of the student body, senior class, or glee clubĀ :-) Now, if some major news organization
231:
I agree with the conclusion reached in this instance but that particular section of the guideline seems...off, to me. Too heavy handed. To subject every person in every list in every article to the full notability criteria seems misguided. But that's an issue for another time; all seems well here.
1630:
Each section heading would be followed with an indented section that describes the sort of stuff that should be under the heading, and would have a wikilink to a page that gave a fuller, but still simplified explanation, and had links to the standard wikipedia pages on the subject. The idea is that
2613:
as redirects that have been used a lot, so removal would not be helpful to those reading old discussions, however as they are now wrong I have removed advertising for them in their associated article in favour of new redirects which follow the main ones. I have also made sure all shortcut redirects
1778:
right, at least in a simplified or relaxed form. (For instance, I'm willing to forgive
Notability for a middle school. If they can find a newspaper article about their school, great. But I'm not going to AfD or speedy the school article because they can't find a citation that it exists. If they
1421:
Back on topic: It depends on just how "notable" these persons are and how that notability is documented. If their only notability derives from their supposed-criminal status and it's not made significant headlines then I don't think we should consider them notable. Further, I don't know what we'd
931:
My problem with those references is that they come from the "Old Boys" of the school for the most part (The first two do, and I'm not sure of the forth) and I suppose it's not the article that bothers me but the vast array of dictionary definitions. I have less problem with the level of coverage in
210:
it says "Several articles contain or stand alone as lists of people - for instance, usually an article on a college includes or links to a list of notable alumni. Such lists are not intended to contain everyone (e.g. not all people who ever graduated from the school). Instead, inclusion on the list
2800:
has come up with a potentially useful macro to automatically add and update infoboxes for UK school articles. There seem to be a few teething problems with flags currently getting deleted and shortened URLs being removed which people might like to look out for as these changes are not evident from
2749:
Im curious as to why we dont use automatic assessments for the quality of our articles. Ive noticed that many of our ~8000 unassessed articles have been assessed by other projects, and I am yet to find one i disagree with. Im just curious why we cant get a bot to go around and fix this, which will
1835:
I'd say this could be a helpful proposal, so long as it didn't develop over time into a set of straightjackets which all school articles were expected to fit into, and I rather think it would tend to do that. I can't see a way to agree for all time at the outset that that wouldn't happen, and in a
1249:
the school can demonstrate notability by other means; I meant more that if the schools building are notable, then include the school information into that as a combined article (In the example I gave, the building gained notability for being a good architectural example of that kind of school, and
838:
Maybe I'm being picky, but none of them seemed like a great fit, so I thought I'd ask here for some expert opinions. Maybe those articles just need to be cleaned up and improved? (I'm working on an article about a US school district...feel free to talk about the situation for other countries but
1764:
Thus my basic thought about making school articles "self annotating", so as you get to each section there is a small hint, with a link to a simplified but fuller discussion, and that article in turn has links to MOS and BLP and NOT and
Notability and the other important things. My idea is to not
1760:
There's a ton of articles on how to do things right. I've been here maybe five months; I figure in about three years I may know most of the important rules. You average 5th grader or even 11th grader in journalism class probably isn't going to spend three years reading article guidelines before
1388:
Someone may want to have a look at this article while considering 'undue bias'. Someone has recently sourced a bunch of notable alimni, all of which are claimed to be sexual criminals of one sort or another, and has included citations. I don't have the time to track the citations to see if they
2662:
Whether or not being an IB school is automatically notable in the same sense that being a medical school is, it greatly increases the chance that the school will be able to earn its notability the old-fashioned way. With that in mind, if a new school stub is created with "IB" in it, try to find
2256:
More discussion is needed on this proposed guideline. In my view, its most unreasonable feature is that it would make a school notable which simply occupies a notable building, even if it has no educational or other claim to notability. That is surely as misguided as claiming that all individual
1733:
I'd have to see how templates like this could handle the other issues (manual of style, copyvio, fair-use, unencyclopedic content, ext links, etc.) to really say. My experience though with leaving HTML maintenance comments in notable alumni sections (i.e. "keep the list alphabetized", "refer to
1626:
My current thinking is along the lines of eventually making some "standard article templates" for various sorts of school articles. These templates would have a collection of section headings in a reasonable order, and a pre-formatted infobox with identifiers for the more likely things that a
1268:
When we had 10 criteria then requiring 2 being met was reasonable. With the present three, having one is essential otherwise few if any schools would be included. The point about the listed building is that certainly the building should be covered. If a school occupies a listed building it is
1118:
The alternative criteria did when that was added require two criterion to be reliably sourced in the article to be considered notable, in the cut down of the alternative criteria it seems to have been reduced to one. I personally prefer requiring two criterion while having a few more of them.
2645:
with dozens of such schools in the category are getting sub-categories. Please join the effort. The goal is to get the count of unsorted schools appearing on the main page down below 200 so you can see them all at once. There are just under 400 schools in the category and its geographical
1090:
to one of the 'Alternative criteria' - "A school will be regarded as notable provided one of the following criteria can be reliably sourced... The school is located in a building of architectural importance, for example... a school in
England which has been designated as a listed building by
730:
I have been bold and reformatted the archiving for this page. I have moved the list of old discussions to a separate page as the entire list was getting to long for this page, and it is easier to read if the dates can be in long format with the extra space. You can find a similar set-up at
1095:." The problem with that is that a non-notable school merely needs to rent or buy a notable building to become notable, an option which isn't open to schools of all kinds. And I can think of at least one worse-than-mediocre school which occupies a listed building. If it's only the
1734:
WP:____", etc.) is that there will always be a subset of newcomers editing school articles who miss or ignore the advice. As an aside, names with articles should still have a ref if their article doesn't verify association with the school and editors should always be wary of
211:
should be determined by the criteria above." I read this as a valedictorian with no other notability asserted does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the school district (or high school) article, either as an entry on her own or as part of a notable alumni section / list.
2353:
I am somewhat new to the project so my word is probably not authoritative. However, I have not seen any guidelines on length beyond the standard en.wiki suggestions on reasonable page length in bytes. The page you reference is 180KB, so by standard length guidelines it is
246:
Agreed, but the problem I have seen otherwise is that "notable residents" sections in municipality articles become link farms - lots of people of questionable notability (no wikilink or red link) with an external link after their name to justify their place in the section.
1686:
link above would go to a page that was a simplified version of the
Notability page, and was tailored for use in school articles. It would say not to add yourself or your girlfriend or worst enemy, but only add someone if they had their own Knowledge (XXG) article
1210:, claim to notability is occupying a listed building, then it simply isn't notable. "I'd have thought that notable (school) buildings would have some coverage over why they were built and how they've been used..." - sure, but this can be done in the article on the
1809:, creating something like that could be useful in limited areas (notables, external links) to engage the good-faith newcomer. Admins and experienced users have great tools on wp, it can be discouraging for the newcomer in finding all the relevant policy/help. ā
2313:
architectural merit", but the present draft doesn't require anything to be combined with architectural merit, it offers 'probable' notability (and the right for a stub to remain, which effectively confers notability) to a school which has no claim to notability
1353:
of these additional criteria must be considered notable "because otherwise few if any schools would be included" - clearly, a large number of schools really are notable without needing to scrabble about for thin qualifications, of which they can find only
1615:
I've been spending a fair amount of time recently killing IP vandalism, and not too surprisingly a lot of it shows up in school articles. Also not too surprisingly, a lot of that is adding completely non-notable people to the "notable alumni" sections.
2400:? I guess it would also be useful to have a list of articles in that category tree that do not have that infobox so that it can be added (A task I've been doing manually for a while for state maintained schools in England (and Wales)) --
665:
2361:
My half pence on the specific page would be to treat it as a list of lists. Do an A-Z page and separate sub-pages for A, B, etc. Other than the length I see nothing to complain about and I applaud the work that has gone into it.
180:
to the content of an article. The guideline itself is explicit on this point ("These notability guidelines only pertain to the encyclopedic suitability of topics for articles but do not directly limit the content of articles.").
1269:
illogical not to mention the school. I actually think the present version has a good chance of acceptance; there seems to be reasonable acceptance. Frankly, any standard is almost better than none; we can then move on ...
882:(and corresponding article sections) should exist as I don't think they meet any notability criteria I can think of. Does anyone know of a general stance (As it only seems common for British schools I'm not sure) on this?
485:
Thank you for your feedback. Yes, by looking at those cats there are several thousand of them categorized. But there are more. To tag them I will be using AWB with the KingBotK plugin. I will be using categories like
1709:
there would be an infobox that already had tags for the more commonly available info, and again, a link to a 'how to fill out this box' page that also listed all of the possible lines and what should -- and should
1691:
article, not just someone with the same name), or if you had a reference to an article in the local or national newspaper (not the school newspaper). The page would also have a link to the actual notability page.
764:
Oddly, I've always been more of a numbers person myself. But it definitely looks less cluttered now. If it's all right, I'd like to keep a link to the archive index on the box so I can more easily access it.
1367:" Frankly, any standard is almost better than none; we can then move on." We don't need any old standard, we need a good one which stands up to examination. With a bad standard, we move on to the wrong place.
1491:
or Cope Middle School. The change doesn't appear to be complete vandalism; or if it is it is quite creative. If anyone know anything about this perhaps they could help. Naturally nothing is sourced.Ā :-(
1448:
talk page. I am honestly unable to determine if this is a school district or perhaps some sort of sports conference from the article content, but it does appear to be school or possibly highschool related.
2279:
Same reply as at the school notability page: Architecture is only one of four criteria looked at when deciding whether to list a given school (or any other location) on the
National Register of Historic
2191:
FYI, one of the participants in the debate just restored the "proposal" status, with the comment "rv change. Still a proposal. Where is the discussion and consensus to support this being a guideline?".
932:
the third ref (more of a case study and less of a glossary). I just see major issues with posting the definitions themselves, less-so the concept of these "notions" and the part they play in the school.
1851:
from schools (that is, from what we call schools in the UK, which are what this Wiki Project deals with). More universally, according to our existing guidance (which I agree with), what Americans call
2822:
If anyone is in need of amusement this school article seems to have some lack of veracity (or at least lack of citations) problems. I'm not sure there will be much left after an attempt at cleanup.
2730:
Someone in the assessment group may want to wander by this article I tripped over. It is unrated, and should be at least a Start and possibly a B rating. At a quick scan it looks quite well done.
2336:
1536:
1742:
already cover a lot of this? Writing a quality article requires effort and learning the process, doing the right research, etc. is the best kind of learning experience one can get from WP. ā
290:
But as was immediately noted (in response to ElKevbo), the notability criteria do apply to people in articles, thus a valedictorian does have to meet the notability guidelines to be included.
2108:
Can someone please point me to the page which says that high schools are more or less automatically notable? Thought I had it, but I can't find it. Please respond to my user page. Thanks! -
1631:
these tutorial "how to format this section" links would generally stay in the article, so that when next semester's yearbook class is working on the article the rules are still available.
1141:
Then we agree and no one has disagreed, so I think it should go back to two. Probably the change to one was made by someone acting without a consensus. Also, if no one has justified the
1311:
This version certainly has a good chance, especially now the introduction and the page overall reads like a guideline. Though concerns such as if schools really should be covered under
2881:
711:? It's an elementary school in Winnetka IL that happens to be a U.S. National Historic Landmark, but the page creators didn't even mention that it was an operational school. Thanks,
2763:
There already is a bot which is automatically assessing school articles as stubs or starts. If you look at the log it seems to have assessed hundreds if not thousands of articles.
1679:(The above formatting isn't quite what I want, I'll have to do some digging into the more esoteric wiki markup to get things right. But it is close enough for discussion sake.)
1911:
I think it should be deleted - it serves no purpose other than telling people where the schools are, which the person probably already knows. Bsrboy 22:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
372:
1452:
If anyone wants to look at this and decide whether the box is appropriate I would appreciate a second set of eyes. Feel free to remove the box if you don't think it belongs.
339:
1345:"With the present three, having one is essential otherwise few if any schools would be included." I don't think that stands up to careful thought. This question is about
444:
2750:
just lighten our workload in this area. Since i started focusing solely on quality assessments here, the number of unassessed has risen from ~3500 to ~8000. Thoughts?
94:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
2528:
Talk:The King's School, Chester#Despite discussion, how can the continuing dispute about adding the CCF past and present leaders in a series of lists be resolved?
2397:
616:
803:
I'm cleaning up tiny details on an article and noticed that there seem to be multiple pages that "elementary" and "secondary" could be wikilinked to, including:
2692:
2305:
With all due respect, the above has nothing to do with justifying the one of the four criteria objected to, and the argument offered is about the notability of
1619:
I've got to thinking that maybe we should be treating school articles as a wikipedia learning experience, rather than as full-fledged articles. Not that they
2638:
1883:. In its current state, it does not meet the requirements to remain a dab page as none of the entries on the page actually exist as articles for schools.
195:
Thanks, but it also says there that "Notability guidelines give guidance on whether a topic is notable enough to be included in Knowledge (XXG) as a
1623:
be full-fledged FA or better articles. But the vast quantity of them aren't, and frandly a whole lot of them aren't even good stubs at this point.
827:
1562:
1103:
and not the school. Perhaps that section should require more than one of the three Alternative criteria, or perhaps the third should be taken out.
2165:
Yes, I have. I've also been following the discussion, and I believe the change from a proposal a few days ago is premature. It's died before.
1843:(a word hardly used at all in schools in the UK, by the way), it seems to me too simplistic and it also doesn't fully comply with the guidance at
1981:
by gutting the unwieldy semi-DAB article in stages then turned it into a redirect to the one remaining school, a barely-notable magnet school.
2437:
2383:
47:
17:
2462:
Are you allowed to make the emblem of your school using software and upload if you can't find any digital images of the emblem online?
1695:
What do people think of this sort of "tutorial page" concept? I think it might result in better school articles for a couple reasons:
1555:
955:
1086:
I agree with almost all of that page, and I'm certainly weary of the widespread view that all schools are notable. But I do have an
2615:
2126:
1064:
2527:
2415:
In addition, whilst I think of it, it would be nice if it updates the "needs infobox" parameter on the talk page appropriately --
854:
I think that while there is a little overlap those are all distinct concepts and need separate pages. But that's just my opinion.
550:
to avoid the redirect. It would also be best if you list which categories you intend to run through if it's not too much trouble.
2837:
I cleared out the unencyclopedic content and added tags, but it needs some more style work including an infobox and checking the
993:
645:
582:
518:
412:
345:
1844:
971:
207:
902:
140:
IMHO, I'd say that they were not at all notable, definitely less than any teacher, and they rarely meet notability standards.
2646:
subcategories. It's not relevant to the sorting project yet, but there are about "2,300 IB World Schools in 127 countries,"
832:
341:
2569:
After a lot of work, I have managed to reorganise the short cuts on sub pages of this project so they follow the main ones (
1551:
986:
331:
1349:, a kind of last chance saloon for non-notable schools. It's nothing to do with notability to say that all schools meeting
2859:
2707:
2675:
2503:
2143:
Have you looked at the infobox at the top of that page? It claims to be an accepted guideline, not a proposed guideline.
1993:
898:
154:
Thanks, I agree normal notability guidelines should apply and am copying your comment to the school district's talk page.
108:
611:
2777:
I constantly find articles that have already been assessed by other projects when doing them. Can it be run more often?
2724:
2491:
Don't be too sure. Fair use has its place. It is not ok to upload them to the Knowledge (XXG) Commons though. IANAL.
1926:
1757:
swim meet, or the first article he has seen is his school article and doesn't have a clue that article guidelines exist.
992:
Hmmm, I'm having trouble even verifying that this school exists too. There appears to be a King's G.S. in Lincolnshire
879:
1683:
1647:
1974:
1935:
1593:
716:
712:
394:
Hi there! I want to start mass tagging geology related article's talk pages so we can identify them. Any objections?
2649:
including more than 100 each in Australia (111), Canada (259), the United Kingdom (132), and the United States (875)
1699:
There would be pre-existing headings, and people just had to hunt around and find some info to put under the heading
621:
487:
447:, that you mean schools, what are you using to identify new pages? What are you tagging them with (as far as text)?
2816:
2390:
2032:
Unfortunate it came to that, you left excellent advice, hope they take it. I'm trying to avoid a similar fate for
1037:
Thanks to both of you for looking. I've tagged it as a suspected hoax. That was my gut instinct too, but I like to
38:
2863:
2711:
2679:
2602:
2594:
2507:
1997:
2656:
2598:
2586:
2222:
Also the edit comment did not say what the change was. That may be why no one noticed and reverted it earlier.
995:
but nothing in the London area remotely having "King" and "Grammar" in the name. Considering the status of the
1357:"The point about the listed building is that certainly the building should be covered." - Groan. The building
963:
2691:
United States started as an example for the bot to follow. Australia done. Canada or the UK may be next.
2590:
2197:
2170:
2134:
2014:
1578:
1566:
1467:
The article is about an athletics conference. Are high school sports conferences under WikiProject Schools?
959:
472:
281:
2582:
1914:
1361:
be covered in an article on the building itself, which merits an article as a building and not as a school.
2893:
2869:
2831:
2827:
2810:
2784:
2772:
2757:
2739:
2735:
2717:
2685:
2627:
2563:
2543:
2513:
2486:
2471:
2449:
2424:
2409:
2371:
2367:
2347:
2324:
2299:
2263:
2231:
2201:
2174:
2152:
2148:
2138:
2119:
2091:
2077:
2059:
2045:
2026:
2003:
1965:
1947:
1906:
1862:
1818:
1792:
1788:
1751:
1727:
1723:
1605:
1582:
1520:
1508:
1501:
1497:
1476:
1461:
1457:
1431:
1413:
1398:
1394:
1377:
1324:
1278:
1263:
1220:
1181:
1151:
1128:
1109:
1080:
1053:
1032:
1012:
941:
922:
891:
863:
848:
788:
774:
759:
744:
720:
696:
677:
654:
639:
591:
576:
559:
527:
512:
476:
456:
436:
421:
406:
384:
357:
319:
299:
285:
262:
241:
226:
190:
169:
149:
134:
2574:
2889:
2227:
1880:
1601:
1488:
1274:
1251:
603:
732:
2806:
2781:
2768:
2754:
2526:
There has been a long-running content dispute about the appropriateness of certain material added to
2343:
2114:
1783:
notable -- to them. Learning that you don't put that in other articles can be a second step, later.
1445:
844:
673:
669:
631:
568:
504:
398:
974:
page for UK schools, but still nothing. Any help in providing sources would be appreciated, thanks,
2538:
1847:. I can mention that in the UK - and in many other English-speaking countries - young people don't
1532:
1169:
822:
380:
309:
252:
216:
159:
124:
2610:
1806:
2420:
2405:
2193:
2166:
2130:
1961:
1902:
1574:
1259:
1177:
1048:
981:
708:
544:
468:
365:
335:
277:
186:
2606:
2570:
1547:
779:
Thanks for catching that, I forgot to re-add the index list when I was doing the reformatting.
2855:
2823:
2731:
2703:
2671:
2623:
2559:
2499:
2482:
2445:
2363:
2144:
1989:
1784:
1719:
1665:
1516:
1493:
1472:
1453:
1427:
1409:
1390:
1320:
1124:
1076:
1028:
937:
887:
859:
816:
812:
807:
784:
755:
740:
555:
494:
452:
432:
295:
237:
145:
2847:-tagged items against the references and making proper in-line citations. Have fun with it.
1653:* ] (graduation year) - why they are notable (if they have their own page on Knowledge (XXG))
1543:
1487:
After the most recent edit, this school has an identity confusion. It can't decide if it is
1000:
908:
875:
2885:
2467:
2223:
1922:
1597:
1542:
I would encourage members of this project to have a look at these articles, and see whether
1270:
1092:
1022:
684:
2578:
2065:
1739:
1312:
1038:
334:. As an example, an athlete that went to my high school was the first person to cross the
2802:
2778:
2764:
2751:
2650:
2433:
2339:
2109:
2087:
2073:
2055:
2041:
2033:
2022:
1943:
1814:
1747:
1702:
There would be a short instruction under most of the headings describing what -- and what
1018:
1008:
840:
692:
1735:
116:
112:
2531:
2477:
No. As I've said previously, it is against the law for you to violate their copyright.
2295:
918:
770:
376:
353:
305:
248:
212:
155:
120:
2396:(or its Scottish counterpart) and the closed parameter is set, and add the article to
1627:
student at the school might know or be able to easily figure out by asking a teacher.
967:
177:
2841:
2797:
2642:
2416:
2401:
1957:
1898:
1255:
1173:
1042:
975:
1554:. Any help in cleaning up this backlog is appreciated. For further information, see
905:
2848:
2696:
2695:
and its sister articles are a good place to start. Hopefully that will be enough.
2664:
2619:
2555:
2492:
2478:
2441:
1982:
1890:
Is there a notable school by this name that should receive this link as a redirect?
1423:
1316:
1120:
1072:
1024:
996:
933:
883:
855:
780:
751:
736:
551:
448:
428:
291:
233:
182:
141:
1512:
1468:
1405:
666:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chinook Middle School (Bellevue, Washington)
660:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chinook Middle School (Bellevue, Washington)
1761:
making his/her first edit, and as a result the first edit will probably be wrong.
2463:
1918:
602:
Alright. The bot is now approved and flagged. the list of articles is available
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2382:
Would it be worth getting a bot to occasionally go through all the articles in
2017:, where a new user is falling afoul of various policies and being bitten hard.
1254:(which in turn barely mentions the architectural importance of the school). --
490:
to locate article talk pages that still need tagging. I will tag them with the
2083:
2069:
2051:
2037:
2018:
1939:
1810:
1743:
1671:
1531:
Hello, on Knowledge (XXG), there are currently about 250 school articles with
1099:
which is notable, then the Knowledge (XXG) article should surely be about the
1004:
688:
427:
Why would we tag geology? This is a project concerned with Secondary schools.
2257:
owners of notable buildings must be notable: notability becomes purchasable!
2291:
1634:
For instance, the notable alumni section might be formatted something like:
914:
766:
349:
2693:
List of schools offering the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme
2337:
Knowledge (XXG):Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board/Archive 29#Behemoths
2335:
Does this project have a policy about large lists? See the discussion at
2319:
2258:
1857:
1372:
1215:
1146:
1104:
799:
Where to point wikilinks on "elementary" and "secondary" (United States)
463:
It appears that the articles have already been tagged. Looking at the
1893:
Should this particular page be speedied as an unnecessary dab page?
687:
template to initiate a merge discussion on an article talk page.
332:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability people#People notable only for one event
1656:* Person Name (graduation year) - why they are notable<ref: -->
1168:
Not sure I agree with that -- if the building is notable, such as
1887:
Could articles be created for the entries that would survive afd?
1836:
world-wide project like Knowledge (XXG) one size doesn't fit all.
1650:
to see if they are notable. Add entries in the following format
2287:
1706:-- to put there, and giving a link to a fuller description page
1535:. Based on a database snapshot of March 12, I have listed them
1404:
The alumni don't have any articles so I would say remove them.
2577:) again. I have removed all the orphaned old short cuts under
2050:
Thanks. Is there a Rapid Response Team for new school pages?
1389:
support the claims, but even if they do, is htis appropriate?
540:
Ok, makes sense, just know not to tag any colleges and to use
25:
2647:
1934:
How about a 'see also' or 'also refers' to the rather messy
1561:
If you have further questions, please leave a message on the
1071:
of evidence that this version will still not gain consensus.
467:
categories, there are several thousand of them categorized.
2068:
though it tends to get clogged with non-emergency requests.
1879:
In the course of my disambiguation work, I have come across
1550:
e.g. to the corresponding locality articles, or possibly be
111:
and a new user has just added the 2006 valedictorian with a
2641:
is being split up by country: A few countries such as the
966:) and as such does not meet at least the barest minimum of
2066:
WP:SCH#Articles in need of emergency, short term attention
1856:
list any school awards or positions e.g. School Captain."
373:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Coffee High School
962:
as it has been tagged as unreferenced since June 2006 (
2129:, but it isn't accepted policy yet and may never be.
707:
Does anybody feel like adding to the stub article for
115:, but the valedictorian herself does not appear to be
2386:(and sub categories). For each article, if it has a
1845:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Schools#Style of entries
1507:
The page was just changed by an IP and now moved to
1592:Just a request for help in populating the category
839:
please say which country to minimize confusion.) --
683:As an aside after the fact, you could also use the
208:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)#Lists of people
1956:Thanks for the input. I appreciate the thoughts.
1145:criterion, then I suggest that needs to come out.
664:If anyone would like, they may add their input to
2522:Outside views requested to help resolve a dispute
2013:Some project participant may want to help out at
1658:(if they do not have a page on Knowledge (XXG))
2398:Category:Defunct schools in the United Kingdom
1245:I didn't mean for it to be separate articles,
897:Although I helped weed out a slang section at
874:I having a little trouble believing that (per
617:Category:Education in Suffolk County, New York
606:. It is created from the following categories:
2614:to this talk page, the main project page and
1768:I'm not so much concerned about them getting
8:
2639:Category:International Baccalaureate schools
2554:until we have a consensus on the guideline.
1875:Request for help with Madison Middle School.
1041:if I'm not 100% sure on the subject matter.
958:, I've been trying to find some sources for
1897:Any thoughts/actions would be appreciated.
2309:. Hjal uses the phrase "based on being...
1546:can be added, whether the articles can be
1774:of the rules right, but with getting the
1646:Before you add a name to this list click
1596:that applies to some schools in England.
1017:It seems to be a hoax. I've found one in
2634:IB category split by country in progress
1418:What does that have to do with anything?
1384:Worthington Christian High School (Ohio)
828:Secondary education in the United States
564:Okay, I will when the bot gets a trial.
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Schools
1657:link to external reference</ref: -->
1214:which contains the non-notable school.
204:(with the exception of lists of people)
199:, but do not specifically regulate the
2438:Category:Schools in the United Kingdom
2384:Category:Schools in the United Kingdom
1556:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Notability
1021:founded by Henry VIII, but that's it.
330:I think that you should also consider
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2127:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (schools)ā
956:Knowledge (XXG):Unreferenced articles
304:Thanks again for all of the feedback
7:
2616:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (schools)
2104:Automatic notability of high schools
1839:On the suggested format for listing
1065:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (schools)
954:Hi, as a participant of the project
103:Notability of Valedictorian question
1668:(1712) - school was named after him
612:Category:Middle schools in New York
24:
2880:There's an bulk cfd just started
2876:Cfd on US High school alumni cats
1611:Musings on school article format
346:I Left My Heart in San Francisco
29:
2440:. Tell me if there are issues.
1170:Glemsford County Primary School
949:
817:Primary_education#United_States
2884:, which might be of interest.
1674:(1976) - invented the computer
833:Education in the United States
622:Category:New York school stubs
1:
1527:Schools of unclear notability
899:Sir Francis Drake High School
385:00:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
371:Opportunity to comment here:
263:17:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
242:14:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
227:13:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
191:12:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
170:11:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
150:06:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
135:03:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
109:Pequea Valley School District
2725:Marikina Science High School
2436:is running and is including
1938:dab or the schools therein?
880:Notions (Winchester College)
750:Looks better, Thanks Chris.
1975:James Madison Middle School
1936:James Madison Middle School
1594:Category:Foundation schools
1533:their notability questioned
1444:I added a wpschools box to
2909:
2894:01:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
2870:17:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
2832:10:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
2817:King Kekaulike High School
2811:10:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
2785:16:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
2773:10:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
2758:06:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
2740:20:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
2718:19:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
2686:15:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
2628:16:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
2564:00:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
2544:22:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
2514:19:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
2487:02:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
2450:04:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
2372:03:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
2348:09:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
2325:19:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
2153:03:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
2139:19:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
2120:05:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
2092:15:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
2078:01:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
2060:00:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
2046:23:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
2027:22:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
2004:19:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
1966:04:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
1948:22:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
1907:22:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
1793:04:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
1752:01:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
1728:19:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
1606:18:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1583:11:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1521:03:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1511:. Identity crisis solved.
1502:03:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1477:03:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1462:02:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1432:04:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1414:03:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1399:21:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
1378:22:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
1325:21:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
1279:16:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
1264:12:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
1221:07:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1182:13:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1152:12:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1129:18:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
1110:17:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
1081:16:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
1054:02:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1033:00:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1013:23:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
987:20:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
942:02:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
923:16:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
892:07:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
864:22:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
849:21:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
697:06:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
655:01:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
2472:17:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
2425:11:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
2410:12:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
2300:15:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
2264:06:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
2232:02:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
2202:02:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
2175:00:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1863:20:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
1819:19:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1573:page however.) Thanks! --
789:16:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
775:14:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
760:01:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
745:15:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
721:09:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
678:00:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
592:21:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
560:04:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
528:00:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
477:00:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
457:23:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
437:23:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
422:22:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
358:22:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
320:19:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
300:18:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
286:17:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
176:Please do not apply the
2659:the US sorting effort.
2657:asked for a bot to help
2015:User talk:Newcityschool
1563:Notability project page
465:*-Class school articles
206:" (emphasis added). At
107:I watch the article on
1714:-- be put on each one.
1509:E.M Cope Middle School
950:King's Grammar, London
713:PatrickStar LaserPants
390:Mass Talk page tagging
2745:Automatic Assessments
2318:architectural merit.
1881:Madison Middle School
1567:my personal talk page
1489:Clement Middle School
1483:Clement Middle School
1252:Royal Hospital School
960:King's Grammar School
488:New York school stubs
178:notability guidelines
42:of past discussions.
2286:See the criteria at
2082:Bookmarked, thanks.
1805:If you haven't seen
1569:. (I'm not watching
1446:AAA Liberty District
1440:AAA Liberty District
2793:UK school infoboxes
1544:independent sources
1347:additional criteria
972:WikiProject Schools
823:Secondary education
443:Assuming, per your
338:on its opening day.
201:content of articles
1973:Same problem with
1588:Foundation schools
709:Crow Island School
703:Crow Island School
500:talk page banner.
366:Coffee High School
336:Golden Gate Bridge
2868:
2867:
2716:
2715:
2684:
2683:
2626:
2512:
2511:
2391:infobox UK school
2358:that it be split.
2118:
2002:
2001:
1930:
1917:comment added by
1736:original research
1666:George Washington
1323:
1127:
1079:
1039:assume good faith
813:Primary education
808:Elementary school
787:
743:
316:
259:
223:
166:
131:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2900:
2853:
2852:
2846:
2840:
2701:
2700:
2669:
2668:
2622:
2541:
2536:
2535:
2497:
2496:
2395:
2389:
2322:
2261:
2112:
1987:
1986:
1912:
1860:
1642:
1375:
1319:
1218:
1149:
1143:notable building
1123:
1107:
1093:English Heritage
1075:
1051:
1045:
984:
978:
878:) pages such as
783:
739:
685:Template:Mergeto
653:
648:
642:
634:
627:Any objections?
590:
585:
579:
571:
549:
543:
526:
521:
515:
507:
499:
493:
420:
415:
409:
401:
314:
257:
221:
197:separate article
164:
129:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2908:
2907:
2903:
2902:
2901:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2878:
2844:
2838:
2820:
2795:
2747:
2728:
2636:
2620:Camaron | Chris
2551:
2539:
2533:
2532:
2524:
2460:
2434:User:BoxCrawler
2393:
2387:
2380:
2378:Bot assistance?
2333:
2320:
2259:
2106:
2034:User:Nowaynotme
2011:
2009:New city school
1877:
1858:
1677:
1638:
1613:
1590:
1529:
1485:
1442:
1386:
1373:
1317:Camaron | Chris
1216:
1147:
1121:Camaron | Chris
1105:
1073:Camaron | Chris
1068:
1049:
1043:
1019:Ottery St. Mary
997:original editor
982:
976:
952:
872:
801:
781:Camaron | Chris
737:Camaron | Chris
728:
705:
662:
651:
646:
640:
632:
628:
588:
583:
577:
569:
565:
547:
541:
524:
519:
513:
505:
501:
497:
491:
418:
413:
407:
399:
395:
392:
369:
313:
256:
220:
163:
128:
113:reliable source
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2906:
2904:
2886:-- roundhouse0
2877:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2819:
2814:
2794:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2746:
2743:
2727:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2635:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2605:. I have kept
2556:Adam McCormick
2550:
2549:Redirect reorg
2547:
2523:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2479:Adam McCormick
2459:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2442:Adam McCormick
2428:
2427:
2379:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2359:
2332:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2105:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2010:
2007:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1951:
1950:
1895:
1894:
1891:
1888:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1837:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1716:
1715:
1707:
1700:
1676:
1675:
1669:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1654:
1640:Notable alumni
1636:
1612:
1609:
1589:
1586:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1484:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1419:
1385:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1369:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1355:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1113:
1112:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1025:Adam McCormick
999:this may be a
951:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
934:Adam McCormick
926:
925:
884:Adam McCormick
871:
868:
867:
866:
856:Adam McCormick
836:
835:
830:
825:
820:
810:
800:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
752:Adam McCormick
727:
724:
704:
701:
700:
699:
661:
658:
637:
625:
624:
619:
614:
608:
607:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
574:
552:Adam McCormick
533:
532:
531:
530:
510:
480:
479:
460:
459:
449:Adam McCormick
440:
439:
429:Adam McCormick
404:
391:
388:
368:
362:
361:
360:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
310:
292:Adam McCormick
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
253:
217:
174:
173:
172:
160:
142:Adam McCormick
125:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2905:
2896:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2875:
2871:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2850:
2843:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2829:
2825:
2818:
2815:
2813:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2799:
2798:User:Ratarsed
2792:
2786:
2783:
2780:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2756:
2753:
2744:
2742:
2741:
2737:
2733:
2726:
2723:
2719:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2666:
2660:
2658:
2653:
2651:
2648:
2644:
2643:United States
2640:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2618:are correct.
2617:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2581:, these are:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2548:
2546:
2545:
2542:
2537:
2529:
2521:
2515:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2494:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2457:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2392:
2385:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2360:
2357:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2338:
2331:List articles
2330:
2326:
2323:
2317:
2312:
2311:combined with
2308:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2288:NRHP#Criteria
2285:
2284:
2265:
2262:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2194:RossPatterson
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2167:RossPatterson
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2131:RossPatterson
2128:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2116:
2111:
2103:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2008:
2006:
2005:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1909:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1892:
1889:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1882:
1874:
1864:
1861:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1713:
1708:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1693:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1673:
1670:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1655:
1652:
1651:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1641:
1635:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1622:
1617:
1610:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1587:
1585:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1575:B. Wolterding
1572:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1538:
1534:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1450:
1447:
1439:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1420:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1222:
1219:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1153:
1150:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1066:
1063:
1055:
1052:
1046:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
991:
990:
989:
988:
985:
979:
973:
969:
968:verifiability
965:
961:
957:
943:
939:
935:
930:
929:
928:
927:
924:
920:
916:
912:
909:
906:
903:
900:
896:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
818:
814:
811:
809:
806:
805:
804:
798:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:
776:
772:
768:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
742:
738:
734:
725:
723:
722:
718:
714:
710:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
659:
657:
656:
652:
649:
643:
636:
635:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
609:
605:
601:
593:
589:
586:
580:
573:
572:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
546:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
529:
525:
522:
516:
509:
508:
496:
489:
484:
483:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
469:RossPatterson
466:
462:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
423:
419:
416:
410:
403:
402:
389:
387:
386:
382:
378:
374:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
342:
340:
337:
333:
329:
328:
321:
318:
317:
307:
303:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
278:RossPatterson
274:
273:
264:
261:
260:
250:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
230:
229:
228:
225:
224:
214:
209:
205:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
179:
175:
171:
168:
167:
157:
153:
152:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
133:
132:
122:
118:
114:
110:
102:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2879:
2824:Loren.wilton
2821:
2796:
2748:
2732:Loren.wilton
2729:
2661:
2654:
2637:
2575:WP:WPSCHOOLS
2552:
2525:
2461:
2381:
2364:Loren.wilton
2355:
2334:
2315:
2310:
2306:
2282:
2281:
2278:
2145:Loren.wilton
2107:
2012:
1978:
1972:
1910:
1896:
1878:
1852:
1848:
1840:
1785:Loren.wilton
1780:
1775:
1770:
1769:
1720:Loren.wilton
1717:
1711:
1703:
1694:
1688:
1681:
1678:
1639:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1620:
1618:
1614:
1591:
1570:
1560:
1541:
1530:
1494:Loren.wilton
1486:
1454:Loren.wilton
1451:
1443:
1391:Loren.wilton
1387:
1358:
1350:
1346:
1246:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1142:
1100:
1096:
1087:
1069:
953:
873:
870:School Slang
837:
802:
729:
706:
668:. Thanks --
663:
630:
629:
626:
567:
566:
503:
502:
464:
397:
396:
393:
370:
308:
251:
215:
203:
200:
196:
158:
123:
106:
78:
43:
37:
2224:Vegaswikian
1913:āPreceding
1776:basic rules
1738:. Doesn't
1718:Opinions?
1598:TerriersFan
1271:TerriersFan
36:This is an
2803:Dahliarose
2765:Dahliarose
2534:DDStretch
2340:Paul foord
2115:Talk to me
2110:Realkyhick
1977:, which I
1672:Bill Gates
1050:talk-to-me
983:talk-to-me
841:Hebisddave
670:DerRichter
95:ArchiveĀ 15
90:ArchiveĀ 14
85:ArchiveĀ 13
79:ArchiveĀ 12
73:ArchiveĀ 11
68:ArchiveĀ 10
2611:WP:SCH/AG
2603:WT:SCH/AG
2595:WT:SCH/AL
2591:WP:SCH/AL
2579:WP:CSD#G7
2356:suggested
2307:buildings
2064:There's
1807:WP:UPLOAD
1206:, repeat
1088:objection
765:Thanks,--
726:Archiving
545:WPSchools
377:Coffee4me
312:<: -->
306:Ruhrfisch
255:<: -->
249:Ruhrfisch
219:<: -->
213:Ruhrfisch
162:<: -->
156:Ruhrfisch
127:<: -->
121:Ruhrfisch
60:ArchiveĀ 5
2860:contribs
2708:contribs
2676:contribs
2607:WP:SCH/A
2599:WT:SCH/A
2587:WT:SCH/P
2583:WP:SCH/P
2571:WP:WPSCH
2504:contribs
2417:Ratarsed
2402:Ratarsed
1994:contribs
1979:resolved
1958:Gwguffey
1927:contribs
1915:unsigned
1899:Gwguffey
1849:graduate
1740:WP:SCH#S
1351:only one
1256:Ratarsed
1212:building
1174:Ratarsed
1101:building
1097:building
1044:ascidian
977:ascidian
964:see here
647:Contribs
584:Contribs
520:Contribs
495:WPSchool
414:Contribs
364:AfD nom
2849:davidwr
2697:davidwr
2665:davidwr
2493:davidwr
2458:Emblems
2283:Places.
1983:davidwr
1552:deleted
1424:ElKevbo
876:WP:DICT
234:ElKevbo
183:ElKevbo
117:notable
39:archive
2864:e-mail
2712:e-mail
2680:e-mail
2624:(talk)
2601:, and
2540:(talk)
2508:e-mail
2464:Bsrboy
2316:except
1998:e-mail
1919:Bsrboy
1853:alumni
1841:alumni
1565:or on
1548:merged
1321:(talk)
1313:WP:ORG
1247:unless
1125:(talk)
1077:(talk)
785:(talk)
741:(talk)
733:WT:RFA
2782:Years
2755:Years
2655:I've
2125:It's
2084:Bovlb
2070:Zedla
2052:Bovlb
2038:Zedla
2019:Bovlb
1940:Zedla
1811:Zedla
1744:Zedla
1689:their
1621:can't
1005:Zedla
689:Zedla
311:: -->
254:: -->
218:: -->
161:: -->
126:: -->
16:<
2890:talk
2882:here
2856:talk
2842:fact
2828:talk
2807:talk
2779:Five
2769:talk
2752:Five
2736:talk
2704:talk
2672:talk
2609:and
2560:talk
2500:talk
2483:talk
2468:talk
2446:talk
2421:talk
2406:talk
2368:talk
2344:talk
2296:talk
2292:Hjal
2228:talk
2198:talk
2171:talk
2149:talk
2135:talk
2088:talk
2074:talk
2056:talk
2042:talk
2023:talk
1990:talk
1962:talk
1944:talk
1923:talk
1903:talk
1815:talk
1789:talk
1748:talk
1724:talk
1684:here
1682:The
1648:here
1602:talk
1579:talk
1571:this
1537:here
1517:talk
1513:EĆ³in
1498:talk
1473:talk
1469:EĆ³in
1458:talk
1428:talk
1410:talk
1406:EĆ³in
1395:talk
1354:one.
1275:talk
1260:talk
1208:only
1204:only
1178:talk
1029:talk
1009:talk
1003:. ā
1001:hoax
938:talk
919:talk
915:Hjal
888:talk
860:talk
845:talk
815:(or
771:talk
767:Jh12
756:talk
717:talk
693:talk
674:talk
641:Talk
633:CWii
604:here
578:Talk
570:CWii
556:talk
514:Talk
506:CWii
473:talk
453:talk
445:BRFA
433:talk
408:Talk
400:CWii
381:talk
354:talk
350:Hjal
296:talk
282:talk
238:talk
187:talk
146:talk
2862:)/(
2858:)/(
2710:)/(
2706:)/(
2678:)/(
2674:)/(
2506:)/(
2502:)/(
2321:Xn4
2260:Xn4
1996:)/(
1992:)/(
1859:Xn4
1771:all
1712:not
1704:not
1558:.
1539:.
1374:Xn4
1359:can
1217:Xn4
1148:Xn4
1106:Xn4
913:.--
232:--
2892:)
2845:}}
2839:{{
2830:)
2809:)
2771:)
2738:)
2652:.
2597:,
2593:,
2589:,
2585:,
2573:,
2562:)
2485:)
2470:)
2448:)
2423:)
2408:)
2394:}}
2388:{{
2370:)
2346:)
2298:)
2230:)
2200:)
2173:)
2151:)
2137:)
2090:)
2076:)
2058:)
2044:)
2036:ā
2025:)
1964:)
1946:)
1929:)
1925:ā¢
1905:)
1817:)
1791:)
1781:is
1750:)
1726:)
1604:)
1581:)
1519:)
1500:)
1475:)
1460:)
1430:)
1412:)
1397:)
1277:)
1262:)
1180:)
1031:)
1011:)
940:)
921:)
910:,
907:,
904:,
890:)
862:)
847:)
773:)
758:)
735:.
719:)
695:)
676:)
558:)
548:}}
542:{{
498:}}
492:{{
475:)
455:)
435:)
383:)
375:.
356:)
298:)
284:)
240:)
189:)
181:--
148:)
64:ā
2888:(
2866:)
2854:(
2851:/
2826:(
2805:(
2767:(
2734:(
2714:)
2702:(
2699:/
2682:)
2670:(
2667:/
2558:(
2510:)
2498:(
2495:/
2481:(
2466:(
2444:(
2419:(
2404:(
2366:(
2342:(
2294:(
2226:(
2196:(
2169:(
2147:(
2133:(
2117:)
2113:(
2086:(
2072:(
2054:(
2040:(
2021:(
2000:)
1988:(
1985:/
1960:(
1942:(
1921:(
1901:(
1813:(
1787:(
1746:(
1722:(
1687:(
1600:(
1577:(
1515:(
1496:(
1471:(
1456:(
1426:(
1408:(
1393:(
1273:(
1258:(
1176:(
1047:|
1027:(
1007:(
980:|
936:(
917:(
886:(
858:(
843:(
819:)
769:(
754:(
715:(
691:(
672:(
650:)
644:|
638:(
587:)
581:|
575:(
554:(
523:)
517:|
511:(
471:(
451:(
431:(
417:)
411:|
405:(
379:(
352:(
315:Ā°
294:(
280:(
258:Ā°
236:(
222:Ā°
185:(
165:Ā°
144:(
130:Ā°
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.