Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Trains/Style advice - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

320: 957:
ampersand "&". This is done to enhance linkability between articles. This is not the correct corporate title in some cases. For example the correct title in 1948 for the Santa Fe is The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. By substituting an incorrect name Knowledge (XXG) is practicing a type of revisionist history and the true name is lost. Knowledge (XXG) should use the correct railroad name, not one of convenience. --SSW9389 22:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
218: 194: 39: 2735:
filled with arduous details about individual train serial numbers/VINs and their whereabouts with little to no independent reliable sources. As with the general norms of Knowledge (XXG), ongoing coverage in regional and national press is an evidence of notability. For this reason, I believe it is more relevant to Union Pacific article than whereabouts of specific train serial #s and their whereabouts.
98: 70: 162: 84: 2297:, for example. What's a railway and what's a Railway is clear when caps are used consistently enough that readers can start to get the difference. The "Road Line" was a good case in points. With endpoints named "New X" and "Y Road" it's not easy to make it completely unambiguous, but the proper case and dashes sure does help a lot. In the case of the 1210: 1146: 2719:. One editor is of the opinion that a recent non-fatal accident deserves hundreds of words of description; another would rather keep bulleted items to about two sentences, with more significant accidents being written up in their own article. We'd love to hear about general practices and other editors' thoughts on the matter. 232: 1948:, which used the naming convention (putting 'FGC' in parentheses after the name of the station) that I then adopted for the two previously mentioned articles I created. But I am not sure if this is the right way to name these pages, as the redlinks to them are often inconsistent. Also the articles about the 1346:
are thrown around with careless abandon, especially where the trains halting at a station are concerned. If they were so important, there would not be so many red links. One idea is to require notability, the same way we do for schools and their alumni. If the train is not a blue link, it goes. It
832:
I'm just wondering why it is necessary to change the titles of articles (move) which have "&" in the title to "and". It's nice to see some consistency and articles should of course display the correct name - but in many cases the "&" is the official spelling and part of the trading style of a
2353:
Thus, I think there is need for creating a new style guide called something like "Articles about rail route" style guide, which should be derived from the Articles about named passenger train services style guide. I also propose the new style guide to the pattern B, C, and D. in the following table.
956:
Ampersands "&" in Railroad titles These little marks are part of many U. S. railroad corporate titles as the railroad names were reported to the Interstate Commerce Commission. It is evidentily Knowledge (XXG) Policy to change actual corporate titles by substituting the word "and" instead of the
752:
The 80th Avenue station, though, would be built to match the surrounding residential neighborhood, park and nearby public library, Hannon said. The Tinley Park Public Library is a prairie-style brick building with slanted roofs similar to nearby homes. The station probably won't serve hot meals, but
669:
Commuters received free coffee and doughnuts as well as a bag of pamphlets telling them about Tinley's efforts to rebuild the more than 25-year-old station. Other pamphlets reminded riders to take the 1-year-old Veterans Parkway from 183rd Street to shave minutes of their trip to the station. Others
2762:
indicates specific subtypes should be used such as the parenthetical "locomotive", "manufacturer model", and "most common company and class names". The last criteria does state "should be named with the most common name used to identify the equipment" which is likely why the "Whyte notation" system
875:
It is interesting that all these article name changes have been made by one person. The section of the Manual of style in question doesn't appear to have been discussed (and apparently was arbitrarily included when the MOS was first set-up more than two years ago) all and I can only agree with the
396:
Part of the style guide suggests not refering to a peice of equipment as she. Yet it has always been customary to personify certain inanimate objects. This comes from Navy tradition and goes back hundreds of years. In languages that use gender for common nouns, locomotives and other vehicles almost
2734:
I feel that a Union Pacific incident that have a significant impact to an entire metropolitan area of a major city and receives multiple ongoing coverage deserves more than a sentence or two in the main Union Pacific page provided that everything said is properly referenced. Currently, the page is
2274:
I don't think that a rail-specific naming convention would be entirely helpful, though it might be a good idea to point out some names of existing articles (ie. descriptive rather than prescriptive). I think it would be better to apply the same naming rules that we already apply to the rest of the
593:
a little more, though, not only does it have pages for the cite, but it seems to have web stuff, too. Maybe this is the one - it would cover both the older paper-only TTs as well as the current Amtrak (and other) web TTs. It also has a free-form id field which could be used for the "form" number
450:
In Europe, EU legistlation has caused that ownership and management of the railway infrastucture and the railway operators (i.e the companies that operate trains to provide the freight and passenger services) have been separated from each other. I think this should somehow be taken into account in
375:
The construction threshhold seems reasonable for inclusion. I've seen similar reasoning used on a couple of AfD keep votes in the past. The key here is that a company is notable enough to be recognized by an outside observer as a separate entity, so the start of construction would form the nexus
1254:
I've mentioned from time-to-time that the SoCal Metrolink station articles need a lot of work. In fact, I've noticed this about a lot of California railroad station articles. Once in a while, I've tried to add infoboxes to many of the station articles for those of you on the west coast, but since
700:
Illinois senators this week offered a plan to create new casinos and expand existing ones to help foot the bill for mass transit in Chicago as well as pay for construction and education. The plan would provide about $ 200 million for the RTA, which oversees the Chicago Transit Authority, Pace and
2301:
examples, that project has decided to declare Subway part of a proper name and capitalize it, even though it's not the official name and is commonly lower case in sources. I gave up there, because I don't want to take on a wikiproject; gave up at astronomy and dog breeds for the same reason.
546:
Creating a template is fairly simple; it gets difficult when you have to keep track of all the brackets when you start adding nested parser functions. I don't see anything in the MLA style guides specifically about citing timetables, so what other guides can we reference for information on an
747:
The $ 4.4 million makeover included a building with an observation tower and facade that matches the architecture of the historic Tinley Park downtown district. A full-service kitchen serves hot coffee, breakfast and lunch. Commuters also received new lighting and surveillance
713:
Tinley Park has been asking for a new station at 80th Avenue for at least two years. It aims to double the size of its nearly 1,500-square-foot terminal, where people snag coffee and wait for rides, and replace the aging platform. In 2005, a lack of state funding delayed the
1431:
The challenge we face is articles that take a single fact, the geographic location of a station, and expand it into paragraphs of trivia. In information theory terms, the location is a single feature. No additional knowledge is conveyed by the following expansions:
360:
have only been used since the early 20th century. Reporting marks seem to be assigned to any campany that is operating trains. Would it be reasonable to extend this back to the 19th century? Would it also be reasonable to include companies that stopped construction
1190:, I'd at least say it's clear the full railroad name appears to have "Company" appended unlike most others, and its use in railroad logos, public advertising, and equipment alone should perhaps warrant certain exemptions for naming accuracy, especially per 2349:
As you know, sometimes railway line names are just nominal. The following table summarize such train routes to railway lines relations. Unfortunately, current style guide applications to the pattern B, C, and D cause confusion on the article contents.
397:
invariably use a feminine form. When refering to a specific peice of equipment 'she' is a valid term. Have a look at the wiki pages for other locomotives E.g. Ja1250, NZR R class or do a search for 'she locomotive'and see how many hits you get.
365:, for instance) or were taken over by another company before beginning operations? In both cases, merging is obviously needed for some minor early lines. But would it be acceptable to simply say "any railroad that started construction work"? -- 2838:
Recently there were edits to several of the EMD locomotive pages that I follow where the change was simply the addition of a totals line. My question is this vandalism or best practice? Has the community come to a consensus about this?
2034:
I'm trying to find some information on the naming convention(s) used for naming train stations. I'm told there was some heated debate about it, but I'm not finding it. I'm trying to resolve some inconsistent names for stations in the
2255:
Not MULTI. It belongs to the Manual of Style. Such a case by case working like with Jammu–Poonch railway doesn't result in consist representation. Here is a place for people that are interested in railway in general and not just one
961:
Since we don't include the capitalized "The" that the ICC does, that's kind of moot. It would also be kind of silly to always refer to it with "and" before the reorganization and "&" after. Maybe we need country-specific rules?
813:, which has 16 top level chapters, and compare these to the "Standard subsections" of "Manual of style". IMHO this part of "Manual of style" needs some attention to be usable and to be able to unify the stucture of the articles. -- 730:
Marcia Partipilo, 45, of Homer Glen, has been serving coffee from a small counter since the brick building opened more than 25 years ago. She said the structure recently received new windows, a new roof and a fresh coat of paint
695:
In the past three years, Metra has had to divert about $ 100 million from capital projects like train station improvements to pay for day-to-day operations because of a lack of money from the state, spokeswoman Judy Pardonnet
1931:
I have a question about the naming conventions of articles that I was hoping someone could answer. I have already read the naming conventions article, and my question was not answered by that. I have written several articles
978:
in which they explain their choice to always use the ampersand, even when the official corporate title uses "and". It's not some sort of "revisionism"; it's a house style that they, and on the opposite end we, have adopted.
1838:
field in the infobox. Many articles have a handicapped icon applied. There seems to be no regular source of this information, certainly not in the the standard Indiarailinfo or NDTV website databases. What standard does
705:"Any funding is helpful; however, what is really needed to sustain our system is a long-term capital program," Pardonnet said. "We have said that from the start. ... We're still hopeful that Springfield will come through." 2817:
The point is that it does not appear the intent of the project was to use only the ambiguous wheel configuration (Whyte notation), but it has just evolved in that direction, so I am just bringing this up for comments.
640:
For 33 years, Cathy Lia has had to lift herself onto the Metra train at 80th Avenue and Timber Drive in Tinley Park. The buckling platform beneath her is marked with divots and low points that force riders to grab and
619:
station, and one source that I have on it contains an article that was reposted on the "Railroad.net" forum. The problem is, I can't for the life of me find out where this article was originally published. Here's the
804:
I think the "Standard subsections" chapters of "Manual of style" are quite weak. To make a resonable article e.g. about a railrod, far more sections than the given four are needed. Look e.g. at the featured articles
1464:
Experience has show that any time a database (or encyclopedia) includes the same material twice, one occurrence is likely to be wrong. Using links to reduce the amount of duplication is truly a better way to go.
645:"It's getting harder and harder to get on that train," Lia, 53, said Wednesday morning, armed with coffee and a bag of goodies, compliments of the village of Tinley Park. "You have to literally pull yourself up." 1976:, but it is only correct to name articles about FGC stations this way if they are serviced by a FGC line that is part of the Barcelona Metro system, which the stations I am talking about are not. Please advise. 1809:
A cursory look at some sites and WP pages suggests Australian terms mostly follow UK/Commonwealth wordings, but differences are possible. Have added links in the generic column to WP pages for reference.
2802:, which is at least a better option than just the wheel configuration. The 4-4-0, even though also used extensively in the United Kingdom, has been commonly referred to as the "American so it would seem 690:
But Metra, which is part of the Regional Transportation Authority, is in no shape to pay its share. The RTA has threatened to slash services and hike fares to deal with a more than $ 200 million budget
1255:
I've never been to California, nor can I think of anything that could ever bring me there, a lot of what I've read about the stations out there have puzzled me. In nay case, I'll help when I can. ----
1067:, that introduced a defaultsort with two spaces between Sussex and Railroad per your guidelines here. May I ask what the reason for the double space is? It has the unfortunate effect of alphabetizing 329: 204: 1285:
Distances to nearby rail stations. A map or table in the line article is a more appropriate place for this. Inclusion in station articles leads to unnecessary duplication of the same information.
175: 722:
As trains barrel down the tracks, commuters line up shoulder to shoulder against a fence. When they board trains, they first look down at their footing, then grab a rail to pull themselves up.
726:
Inside the one-story station building, five benches that can fit about four people each line white, barren walls. Riders can buy a cup of joe for 60 cents or 75 cents, depending on the size.
1244:, a commuter rail service in Southern California. I was wondering if there was a Manual of Style for train stations, as I can't seem to locate one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -- 451:
the structute of articles about railroads. The current style guide appears to imply that railway operator owns and manages infrastucture of it's own, which is not any more always the case.
1949: 2870: 142: 1295:
Elevation above sea level. Yes, it may be available, but is it useful? It is significant only if the station is subject to flood. This datum didn't make it into the station infobox
661:
Tinley Park officials want commuters to know they feel their pain. That's why Mayor Ed Zabrocki and more than a dozen village employees arrived at the station before dawn Wednesday.
1143:
seem to suggest this being part of the full railroad name. Perhaps in circumstances like these, such railroads could be exempt from the common practice of leaving out this title.
1862:
of Indian railways stations (but both are defined). Unless there is a place to wikilink to, there is no point in having these data elements in Indian railway station articles.
1076: 1355:
appear frequently in the description of the station itself. There is no doubt that a station is important to the village, town, or city in which it is located, but to be
1461:. Nevertheless, editors should be commended for articles that supply all the relevant information or links in the fewest paragraphs. That is what serves the reader best. 935: 931: 761:
The village plans to start designing the station so it can begin construction when money becomes available, Niehaus said. The project likely will cost about $ 4 million.
376:
between conceptual and concrete entities. Having an assigned reporting mark indicates that the company is recognized as a separate entity by an impartial outside party.
2895: 670:
encouraged commuters to sign up for a community e-mail that would provide information about the 80th Avenue station, including construction updates and special events.
2646: 1843:
have for handicapped access if any? If there is no source for this data, I will simply blank this field. Otherwise it will convey false expectations to readers.
1523:
refers to the complexity of the track configuration at a station, including whether it has switches and signals. It indicates the training required of the pilot.
2890: 2885: 2880: 2171: 1123:
But, I suppose some exceptions can me made in certain cases where the naming convention is clear enough. Probably a good example of this rare case would be the
1104:
Are there any objections to codifying the common practice of leaving off the word "Company" from an article name when it comes after "Railway" or "Railroad"? --
743:
Tinley Park Trustee Greg Hannon said new amenities at 80th Avenue would be similar to those at the Oak Park Avenue train station, which was renovated in 2003.
2759: 2650: 1941: 105: 1878:
is a waste or time. It may require the coordinates and station name to be entered a second time. It is simple to blank or delete it, then use the simpler
2050: 152: 2331:. In accordance with them, the above-proposed capitalised 'Railroad' and en dash have been implemented in article titles of railroads in Slovenia (see 2008:
uses multiple formats for it's FGC station redlinks: RubĂ­ station (FGC), Valldoreix FGC station, and Sant Cugat station (non of these pages exist).
682:
So far, Tinley Park has set aside about $ 1 million for the project and has secured a $ 700,000 federal grant, village manager Scott Niehaus said.
2711:
How much detail should be included about each accident in a bulleted list of accidents on a railroad article page? This has come up over at the
1968:? Also, if you look at the names of some of the articles about the FGC stations, you will see that they have the name of the article followed by 1347:
is a simple matter to determine whether a train halts at a particular station, so the matter of additional references is no big deal. The words
1118:" to legally identify the corporation as opposed to being officially appended as part of the railroad's name, which makes sense to leave it out. 2085: 735:
Partipilo understands people might want a few extras at a train station, but she said commuters spend only five minutes or so coming and going.
1186:
Well, look at it in this way; it's an unofficial/unrelated news article with merely a single link to the railroad's website. Given the use of
2900: 1014: 916: 413: 2875: 2129: 529:
but it'd be kind of nice to have a generic timetable cite given how ubiquitous TTs are in RR history ... Is it hard to make a template? --
1901:
Are there parameters to allow two images at once to be added to infoboxes? I noticed that somebody added a second image in the one for the
686:
Metra has to pay for a new building and platform, which is estimated to cost about $ 2 million. Tinley will cover the cost of any upgrades.
430:. In addition, there are a huge number of non-native English readers who access the site, so the use of idioms is generally frowned upon. 2235: 270: 266: 114: 17: 2618:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
942:
doesn't mention the use of the ampersand in article titles any more. Personally, I'd prefer to continue to use "and" for consistency.
2332: 2139: 1371:. No description is required for the others. Argue for other numbers, but agree at least that half cannot get a superlative title. 1305:
Gratuitous descriptions of nearby attractions, unless the station is the only access or is the attraction. WP is not a travel guide.
674:
As riders waited for trains, Zabrocki chatted with them, telling them about the financial questions that are holding up improvements.
2668: 2119: 781: 1114:
Hmm, it's hard saying if there's anything wrong against the use of it. In most general cases, the term "Company" is usually used "
2472: 2200: 2195: 621: 1241: 262: 253: 199: 75: 50: 1288:
Distance to nearest airport. Yes, it may be available, but is it useful? This datum didn't make it into the station infobox
83: 2054: 1420:
are elements of the article and not normally subject to notability standards on their own, although they are subject to
1302:
References that describe work on the line, not the station. The result is duplicated text for many stations on the line.
1124: 841: 678:
The 80th Avenue station serves about 3,000 commuters a day and is the fourth-busiest station on the entire Metra system.
2687: 2609: 2477: 1445:
A list of every other station on the line. That is better conveyed by a route map, best accessible by link to the line.
718:
A look at the station during early morning rush hour provides a glimpse of why the village is calling for improvements.
118: 23: 2716: 2210: 2101: 1072: 784:
without the original publication of the source. But I'd still like to find out where it was originally published. ----
362: 2185: 1973: 1501: 1363:, the effect needs to be more broad. As a first cut, the top ten percent are major. The bottom twenty percent are 919:
I have provided several reasons (including references) why that particular article should retain the ampersand. -=#
2149: 2091: 1237: 1217: 1153: 171: 2437: 1927:
I posted this question on the help desk page, and they sent me here. So here is my question that I posted there:
1902: 854:
When the ampersand forms part of a registered name (e.g. Brown & Watson); it should not be replaced with and.
806: 2112: 653:
So does Donna Herman 42, of Tinley Park, who said she has sprained her ankle twice getting on and off the train.
1296: 1289: 885: 765:
Will somebody tell me where this was published? Or will it be okay if I just use the forum as a reference? ----
409: 2697: 2619: 889: 319: 56: 657:"When you jump down, you jump into the potholes," Herman said while waiting for her ride to downtown Chicago. 2155: 810: 502: 2856: 2827: 2744: 2728: 2678: 2640: 2363: 2339: 2311: 2284: 2269: 2250: 2224: 2066: 2043: 2023: 1995: 1914: 1891: 1819: 1803: 1540: 1474: 1407: 1380: 1324: 1264: 1248: 1221: 1173: 1157: 1108: 1093: 1083: 1052: 1030: 983: 966: 951: 924: 893: 867: 822: 793: 774: 598: 556: 533: 514: 471: 457: 439: 401: 385: 369: 2766: 2712: 2636: 2179:
So it is not a Road Line, but Road is part of the name of one end point. Still ambiguous is the word "New"
2161: 488: 467:
Is there a template for citing timetables, employee or public? I've looked but don't seem to see one. --
405: 2665: 1213: 1149: 1089:
Just noticed the guideline discussion on the main wikiproject talk page. I'll take my comments there. --
1002: 881: 2654: 1787: 2298: 1757: 818: 939: 2740: 2280: 2246: 1040: 649:
Lia would like a new train station, but most of all, the Orland Park resident wants a new platform.
2261: 2216: 1944:. I was at first unsure about how to name these pages, but then I found a page on the same topic, 938:
and consensus was to still use "and" at that time. The only change that I see since then is that
110: 2307: 2205: 1090: 1080: 1010: 587: 495: 2231: 1458: 422:
Because it's not encyclopedic style and presents an unprofessional appearance. Knowledge (XXG)
1136: 2852: 2632: 2265: 2220: 2016: 1988: 1933: 1707: 1582: 1403: 974: 622:
http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=478329&sid=55f4f3937d836f1014d50cd0838b4819
481: 2653:– Misleading name; this is not among the Manual of Style guidelines nor its subpages; it's a 1167: 908:
unless the ampersand can be shown to be correct as part of a registered name or trading style
2823: 2724: 2660: 2461: 1945: 1937: 1887: 1815: 1799: 1607: 1536: 1470: 1376: 1320: 946: 877: 551: 509: 434: 380: 1531:
refers to the quality and alignment of the track on a line and the resulting speed limits.
1191: 1140: 899:
I propose the section of the Manual of Style should be changed to read something like this:
427: 2062: 1910: 1840: 1791: 1270: 1260: 1245: 1068: 1064: 1048: 1026: 814: 789: 770: 454: 113:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the 1425: 1395: 1187: 2758:
Sometimes things just go in a direction and end up that way. The four criteria found in
2039:
system and had a rename reverted. Anyway, can someone point me in the right direction? —
2736: 2452: 2448: 2276: 2239: 920: 863: 357: 258: 1448:
A list of every major city accessible from this station. In a connected rail network,
1421: 1391: 1387: 1386:
IMvHO, it's quite simple. For a station to sustain a stand-alone article, the formula
876:
comment above. Why do people have to be so keen and not let common sense prevail? --
423: 217: 193: 2864: 2787: 2494: 2457: 2336: 2303: 1682: 1170: 1105: 980: 963: 577: 523: 274: 241: 2848: 2359: 2011: 1983: 1399: 2846:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=EMD_GP60&diff=prev&oldid=1210324310
477:
There isn't one that I know of, but there should be. For those that are online,
2819: 2783: 2720: 2483: 1957: 1883: 1811: 1795: 1783: 1732: 1532: 1466: 1372: 1316: 1006: 943: 844:
both of which are correct, but only the first is the correct, copyrighted name.
757:"It doesn't need to be a central focal point like Oak Park Avenue," Hannon said. 548: 506: 431: 377: 2696:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
2058: 2040: 2036: 1906: 1632: 1256: 1044: 1022: 1018: 785: 766: 595: 530: 468: 161: 97: 69: 930:
Using the word "and" instead of an ampersand in article titles was discussed
2499: 2236:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Trains#Problem at Talk:Jammu–Poonch railway
1273:, pardon me for approaching from the negative, but we might discuss what is 849: 837: 1872:
should be blank or deleted altogether in Indian railway station articles.
2294: 2290: 994: 366: 2289:
I agree. The rail naming would be greatly improved it would conform to
1438:
A list of every train passing the station. If the list is curated, i.e.
261:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can visit the
2355: 1457:
This is all a matter of style. It needs not be policy. That would be
1128: 998: 1495:
of Indian rail stations from an unreliable, but likely true source:
2564:(Railway line: Articles about rail transport companies (railroads)) 617:
Tinley Park - 80th Avenue (Metra)|Tinley Park - 80th Avenue (Metra)
231: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2779: 2775: 1657: 739:"Why spend the money?" she said. "Just beautify it a little more." 1940:) about train stations run by a Catalan train company called the 1854:
field in the infobox. There is no way for a reader to interpret
1553:
Use the terms below (and edit if I'm wrong or missed something):
993:
Is anybody willing to create infoboxes specifically for Canada's
2806:
might be better. The 4-6-0 has commonly been referred to as the
2260:
that some people want to name inconsistent with other articles.
1209: 1145: 1502:"What are the different classes of the railway stations in IR?" 905:
Article names should use the word "and" instead of an ampersand
109:, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of 2760:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains/Style advice#Article name 2
2567:(Named trains: Articles about named passenger train services) 2523:(Named trains: Articles about named passenger train services) 32: 665:
It was part commuter appreciation day, part campaign effort.
630:
Rebuilding plans on hold at Tinley Park Metra stop - for now
318: 257:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 160: 1132: 2834:
Addition of Totals to Rolling Stock or Motive Power Tables
265:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1826:
Use of infobox station in Indian railway station articles
1039:: -- I just found somebody who did. Everybody can thank 1905:, but it's within a thumbnail, and it's off center. ---- 2845: 2328: 2324: 2175: 2165: 2143: 2133: 2123: 2095: 701:
Metra, but the agency would have to pay the money back.
24:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Trains/Manual of style
1483:
Indian railway station classes, grades, and categories
2782:?), lacking a specific "prefaced" identifier such as 2686:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2426:
A route consists of the same name line + other lines
1236:
Hi there. I'm attempting to clean up and improve the
2518:
Articles about rail transport companies (railroads)
2057:, but I posted the talk page from that instead. ---- 1077:
Category:Transportation in Sussex County, New Jersey
2871:
Low-impact WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
2622:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2548:
Articles about rail transport companies (railroads)
2515:
Articles about rail transport companies (railroads)
2512:
Articles about rail transport companies (railroads)
2354:Any feedbacks and suggestions are welcome. Thanks. 836:The equivalent would be for me to move the article 583:lacks a pages field, which is annoying. Looking at 356:I'm not sure about the notability standards, since 301: 2700:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2647:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains/Manual of style 1063:Hi, all. Saw a recent edit to an article I built, 2142:(28 July 2012 moved to X branch line by Dicklyon 1282:References that describe routine schedule changes 997:stations? The United States already has them for 487:can be used; I used that for a couple such as on 2765:" using disambiguation as appropriate (such as 2651:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains/Style advice 2345:Proposing articles about rail route style guide 1929: 49:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 2132:(28 July 2012 moved to X railway by Dicklyon: 2122:(28 July 2012 moved to X railway by Dicklyon: 1527:describes annual passenger count and revenue. 2172:New Jalpaiguri-Alipurduar-Samuktala Road Line 2051:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (stations) 1452:city should be accessible from every station. 1412:Yeh, I agree. The sticky point here is that 446:Railway operators vs. infrastructure managers 8: 519:Kinda complex. I've been using the generic 2707:How much detail about individual accidents? 2423:A route name has no relevant to line names. 2164:(28 July 2012 moved to X chord by Dicklyon 2094:(28 July 2012 moved to X line by Dicklyon: 1956:and then the name of the line (for example 178:on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links. 2608:The following is a closed discussion of a 2174:(28 July 2012 moved to X line by Dicklyon 1555: 1279:appropriate for railway station articles: 611:Trouble with a source for a future article 298: 188: 64: 2594:(Named trains: {{Infobox_rail_service}}) 2107:Several use "X specifier"/"X Specifier": 2077:There are several formats to name lines: 2881:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages 2367: 133:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages 2896:Article maintenance task force articles 190: 66: 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Trains 2086:Western Line (Mumbai Suburban Railway) 1850:of the station, then go on to use the 1398:applies, as it does for all articles. 932:as early as 2004 in WikiProject Trains 917:Talk:Northampton & Lamport Railway 809:, where there are 9 main sections, or 594:often used by RRs. Whaddya think? -- 2891:NA-importance rail transport articles 2886:Project-Class rail transport articles 2591:(Railway line: {{Infobox_rail_line}}) 2511: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1558: 7: 2774:It seems the disambiguation used at 2627:The result of the move request was: 2420:2 or more routes consists of a line. 1500:Laha, Sourindra (12 December 2018). 38: 36: 1960:). Should the stations be named as 302:Associated projects or task forces: 55:It is of interest to the following 2333:Category:Railway lines in Slovenia 2140:Sheoraphuli-Tarakeswar Branch Line 2115:(!easily mistaken to be a company) 1207:Any thoughts from others perhaps? 842:soft drink with vegetable extracts 615:I'm trying to write an article on 392:Why not refer to equipment as she? 330:the Article maintenance task force 283:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains 127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Essays 117:. For a listing of essays see the 106:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays 31: 2790:, might be better presented like 2763:began to be used, but also adds, 2120:Jasidih Dumka Rampurhat Rail Line 753:it will have coffee, Hannon said. 709:That means projects have to wait. 636:By Kristen Schorsch, Staff writer 491:. For others, some variation of 251:This page is within the scope of 103:This page is within the scope of 2545:Proposed style guide application 2473:B_(New_York_City_Subway_service) 2201:R (New York City Subway service) 2196:2 (New York City Subway service) 2130:Nilambur – Shoranur Railway Line 1546:When a railway article mandates 1208: 1144: 972:I recently read an old issue of 628:The train's still in the station 230: 216: 192: 96: 82: 68: 37: 2876:NA-Class Knowledge (XXG) essays 2601:Requested move 16 December 2017 2509:Current style guide application 2417:A route is identical to a line. 1100:Exclusion of the word "Company" 1846:Various articles describe the 1174:16:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 1158:14:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 1109:10:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 2857:17:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 2679:02:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 2658: 2641:19:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 2405:Train route < Railway line 2364:06:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2340:08:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC) 2234:, please can we keep this at 2024:12:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 1996:12:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 1892:22:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 1820:01:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC) 1541:01:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 1053:06:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1031:16:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 271:WikiProject Trains to do list 2901:All WikiProject Trains pages 2745:06:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC) 2729:03:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 2055:Martinsburg (Amtrak station) 2053:). I wanted to post this on 1915:01:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1804:15:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC) 1487:Here is a an explanation of 1475:10:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 1408:09:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 1381:01:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 1325:00:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 1308:Think before you describe a 1249:23:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1125:Panama Canal Railway Company 823:14:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 794:18:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC) 782:I created the article anyhow 775:22:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 599:15:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 557:10:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 547:appropriate citation style? 534:21:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 515:11:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 501:can be used, as was used on 472:21:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 386:21:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 370:21:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 147:This page has been rated as 2828:10:32, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 2397:Train route = Railway line 2211:Line A (Buenos Aires Metro) 2102:Tucheng Line (Taipei Metro) 1222:11:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 1073:Sussex Airport (New Jersey) 363:South Pennsylvania Railroad 286:Template:WikiProject Trains 130:Template:WikiProject Essays 2917: 2394:Train route ≠ Railway line 2391:Train route = Railway line 2150:Howrah-Bardhaman Main Line 2092:Howrah-New Jalpaiguri Line 2067:18:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 2044:18:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 1923:Article naming conventions 1442:, then the list is useful. 1079:. This isn't desirable. -- 1013:, and Canada has some for 967:23:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 624:), and he're the article; 440:10:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 327:This page is supported by 2583: 2577: 2574: 2571: 2558:Articles about rail route 2556: 2553:Articles about rail route 2550: 2547: 2544: 2517: 2508: 2438:Hudson Line (Metro-North) 2407: 2393: 2390: 2312:20:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2285:14:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2270:13:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 2251:16:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 2225:14:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 2030:Station naming convention 1962:La Floresta (FGC station) 1903:Dallas Area Rapid Transit 1830:Various articles have an 1794:you may wish to comment. 1265:15:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC) 1094:13:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 1084:13:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 952:13:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 925:11:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 894:01:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 868:22:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 807:Rail transport in Romania 326: 297: 211: 168: 146: 91: 63: 2693:Please do not modify it. 2615:Please do not modify it. 2585:{{Infobox_rail_service}} 2580:{{Infobox_rail_service}} 1974:SarriĂ  (Barcelona Metro) 1897:Two images for infoboxes 1418:Trains serving a station 1297:Template:Infobox_station 1290:Template:Infobox_station 984:12:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 458:12:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 2655:wikiproject advice page 2238:where it originated? -- 2156:Barauni-Katihar section 1966:FGC station La Floresta 1440:really important trains 1238:articles about stations 1232:MOS for train stations? 936:discussed again in 2005 811:Rail transport in India 503:Sioux (passenger train) 416:) 14:00, April 20, 2007 289:rail transport articles 2767:John Bull (locomotive) 2713:Union Pacific Railroad 2258:proposed line in India 2186:Fremont–Daly City line 2162:Howrah-Bardhaman Chord 2073:Line naming convention 2006:s-rail/s-line template 1978: 1435:The nearest five towns 1131:. Everything from the 1059:Defaultsort guidelines 828:Erroneous use of "and" 763: 489:Carl Sandburg (Amtrak) 428:not a personal website 323: 172:automatically assessed 165: 153:project's impact scale 111:Knowledge (XXG) essays 2575:{{Infobox_rail_line}} 2049:Here's the standard ( 1003:Long Island Rail Road 626: 322: 170:The above rating was 164: 2478:Shƍnan–Shinjuku Line 2299:New York City Subway 2113:Jammu–Poonch railway 2080:Common is "X Line": 800:Standard subsections 2842:Below is the edit: 2808:4-6-0 (Ten-wheeler) 1633:pedestrian overpass 1188:reliable references 1041:User:Secondarywaltz 989:VIA-style infoboxes 205:Article maintenance 2206:U5 (Berlin U-Bahn) 1708:yard-only operator 1690:halt; request stop 1548:Use Indian English 1011:New Jersey Transit 634:September 20, 2007 424:is an encyclopedia 324: 254:WikiProject Trains 166: 51:content assessment 2796:2-8-4 (Berkshire) 2776:4-8-4#Development 2715:page, and is now 2657:essay, on style. 2598: 2597: 2408:Train route : --> 1970:(Barcelona Metro) 1950:FGC's train lines 1934:La Floresta (FGC) 1788:Fowler&fowler 1781: 1780: 1765:coach or carriage 1758:passenger carrier 1643:pedestrian bridge 1166:Not necessarily: 949: 554: 512: 437: 418: 404:comment added by 383: 349: 348: 345: 344: 341: 340: 337: 336: 249: 248: 187: 186: 183: 182: 179: 22:(Redirected from 2908: 2804:4-4-0 (American) 2792:4-8-2 (Mountain) 2780:4-8-4 (Northern) 2717:under discussion 2695: 2677: 2617: 2572:Proposed infobox 2462:Kansai Main Line 2368: 2323:Please also see 2242: 2128:X Railway Line: 2022: 2019: 2014: 2003:infobox template 1994: 1991: 1986: 1946:Les Planes (FGC) 1938:Sant Cugat (FGC) 1870:native_name_lang 1637:foot over bridge 1556: 1516: 1514: 1512: 1214:TimberWolf Railz 1212: 1150:TimberWolf Railz 1148: 1127:(PCRC) based in 947: 915:For example, at 780:For the record, 592: 586: 582: 576: 552: 528: 522: 510: 500: 494: 486: 480: 435: 417: 398: 381: 309: 299: 291: 290: 287: 284: 281: 234: 225: 224: 220: 213: 212: 207: 196: 189: 169: 135: 134: 131: 128: 125: 100: 93: 92: 87: 86: 85: 80: 72: 65: 42: 41: 40: 33: 27: 2916: 2915: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2861: 2860: 2836: 2753: 2709: 2704: 2691: 2675: 2613: 2603: 2504: 2488: 2466: 2442: 2347: 2329:this discussion 2240: 2138:X Branch Line: 2075: 2032: 2017: 2012: 2009: 1989: 1984: 1981: 1925: 1899: 1882:field instead. 1841:Indian Railways 1828: 1562:Indian English 1551: 1510: 1508: 1499: 1485: 1337: 1314:major junction. 1234: 1102: 1069:Sussex Railroad 1065:Sussex Railroad 1061: 991: 830: 802: 613: 590: 584: 580: 574: 526: 520: 498: 492: 484: 478: 465: 463:Timetable cite? 448: 406:203.167.147.198 399: 394: 358:reporting marks 354: 307: 288: 285: 282: 279: 278: 250: 236: 235: 202: 132: 129: 126: 123: 122: 119:essay directory 81: 78: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2914: 2912: 2904: 2903: 2898: 2893: 2888: 2883: 2878: 2873: 2863: 2862: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2800:4-6-4 (Hudson) 2772: 2752: 2751:Article titles 2749: 2748: 2747: 2708: 2705: 2703: 2702: 2688:requested move 2682: 2673: 2644: 2625: 2624: 2610:requested move 2604: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2582: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2555: 2549: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2513: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2503: 2502: 2497: 2491: 2489: 2487: 2486: 2480: 2475: 2469: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2455: 2453:Montauk Branch 2449:Babylon Branch 2445: 2443: 2441: 2440: 2434: 2432: 2428: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2399: 2398: 2395: 2392: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2372: 2346: 2343: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2275:encyclopĂŠdia. 2214: 2213: 2208: 2203: 2198: 2189: 2188: 2182: 2168: 2158: 2152: 2146: 2136: 2126: 2116: 2105: 2104: 2098: 2088: 2074: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1972:(for example, 1924: 1921: 1919: 1898: 1895: 1852:classification 1827: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1779: 1778: 1775: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1762:coach or bogie 1760: 1754: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1683:on-demand stop 1679: 1678: 1675: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1635: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1610: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1579: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1569: 1568:North America 1566: 1563: 1560: 1550: 1544: 1518: 1517: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1462: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1446: 1443: 1436: 1429: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1310:major station, 1306: 1303: 1300: 1293: 1286: 1283: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1161: 1160: 1120: 1119: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1055: 990: 987: 970: 969: 928: 927: 912: 911: 901: 900: 873: 872: 871: 870: 857: 856: 829: 826: 801: 798: 797: 796: 758: 754: 749: 744: 740: 736: 732: 727: 723: 719: 715: 710: 706: 702: 697: 692: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 637: 635: 631: 629: 612: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 539: 538: 537: 536: 464: 461: 447: 444: 443: 442: 393: 390: 389: 388: 353: 350: 347: 346: 343: 342: 339: 338: 335: 334: 325: 315: 314: 312: 310: 304: 303: 295: 294: 292: 259:rail transport 247: 246: 237: 229: 228: 223: 221: 209: 208: 197: 185: 184: 181: 180: 167: 157: 156: 145: 139: 138: 136: 101: 89: 88: 73: 61: 60: 54: 43: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2913: 2902: 2899: 2897: 2894: 2892: 2889: 2887: 2884: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2874: 2872: 2869: 2868: 2866: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2847: 2843: 2840: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2816: 2815: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2788:Santa Fe 3751 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2770: 2768: 2761: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2706: 2701: 2699: 2694: 2689: 2684: 2683: 2681: 2680: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2663: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2623: 2621: 2616: 2611: 2606: 2605: 2600: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2586: 2581: 2578:Train route: 2570: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2559: 2554: 2551:Train route: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2514: 2507: 2501: 2498: 2496: 2495:Yamanote Line 2493: 2492: 2490: 2485: 2481: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2470: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2458:Yamatoji Line 2456: 2454: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2444: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2433: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2412: 2409:Railway line 2404: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2351: 2344: 2342: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2212: 2209: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2187: 2183: 2180: 2176: 2173: 2170:X Road Line: 2169: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2151: 2148:X Main Line: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2118:X Rail Line: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2078: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2015: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1987: 1977: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1952:are named as 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1928: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1896: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1842: 1837: 1833: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1768:passenger car 1767: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1734: 1733:cargo carrier 1731: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1608:train manager 1606: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1565:UK/Australia 1557: 1554: 1549: 1545: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1507: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1494: 1490: 1482: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1460: 1456: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1345: 1341: 1334: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1299:for a reason. 1298: 1294: 1292:for a reason. 1291: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1278: 1277: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1231: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1142: 1141:rolling stock 1138: 1137:railroad logo 1134: 1133:official site 1130: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 988: 986: 985: 982: 977: 976: 968: 965: 960: 959: 958: 954: 953: 950: 945: 941: 937: 933: 926: 922: 918: 914: 913: 909: 906: 903: 902: 898: 897: 896: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 869: 865: 861: 860: 859: 858: 855: 851: 847: 846: 845: 843: 839: 834: 827: 825: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 778: 777: 776: 772: 768: 762: 759: 755: 750: 745: 741: 737: 733: 728: 724: 720: 716: 711: 707: 703: 698: 693: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 638: 632: 625: 623: 618: 610: 600: 597: 589: 579: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 558: 555: 550: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 535: 532: 525: 518: 517: 516: 513: 508: 504: 497: 490: 483: 476: 475: 474: 473: 470: 462: 460: 459: 456: 452: 445: 441: 438: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 391: 387: 384: 379: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 364: 359: 351: 332: 331: 321: 317: 316: 313: 311: 306: 305: 300: 296: 293: 276: 275:Trains Portal 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 245: 244: 243: 242:Trains Portal 238: 233: 227: 226: 222: 219: 215: 214: 210: 206: 201: 198: 195: 191: 177: 173: 163: 159: 158: 154: 150: 144: 141: 140: 137: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 102: 99: 95: 94: 90: 77: 74: 71: 67: 62: 58: 52: 48: 44: 35: 34: 25: 19: 2844: 2841: 2837: 2764: 2710: 2692: 2685: 2661: 2645: 2633:TonyBallioni 2628: 2626: 2614: 2607: 2584: 2579: 2557: 2552: 2484:Named trains 2352: 2348: 2322: 2257: 2215: 2190: 2178: 2106: 2079: 2076: 2033: 2010: 2005: 2002: 1982: 1979: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1953: 1930: 1926: 1918: 1900: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1845: 1835: 1831: 1829: 1782: 1693:whistle stop 1590:train driver 1552: 1547: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1509:. Retrieved 1505: 1492: 1488: 1486: 1449: 1439: 1417: 1413: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1313: 1309: 1275: 1274: 1235: 1115: 1103: 1062: 1036: 992: 973: 971: 955: 929: 921:Amos E Wolfe 907: 904: 890:book reviews 874: 864:Amos E Wolfe 853: 848:(edit) from 835: 831: 803: 764: 760: 756: 751: 746: 742: 738: 734: 729: 725: 721: 717: 712: 708: 704: 699: 694: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 639: 633: 627: 616: 614: 573:The generic 466: 453: 449: 400:— Preceding 395: 355: 328: 269:. See also: 263:project page 252: 240: 239: 148: 104: 57:WikiProjects 47:project page 46: 2784:Timken 1111 2698:move review 2662:SMcCandlish 2620:move review 2154:X section: 2111:X railway: 1958:FGC line S1 1876:map_locator 1866:native_name 1743:freight car 1740:goods wagon 1737:goods wagon 1139:, and even 1007:Metro-North 878:Harlsbottom 2865:Categories 2629:page moved 1640:footbridge 1571:Australia 1511:6 February 1493:categories 1271:TorriTorri 1246:TorriTorri 1240:served by 1019:GO Transit 940:WP:MOSNAME 934:. It was 815:Sivullinen 455:Sivullinen 352:Notability 267:discussion 149:Low-impact 115:discussion 79:Low‑impact 2737:Graywalls 2500:Nara Line 2277:bobrayner 2160:X Chord: 1618:conductor 1357:important 1349:important 1344:important 1335:Hyperbole 1242:Metrolink 850:Ampersand 838:Coca-Cola 833:company. 588:cite book 496:cite book 2482:Most of 2431:Examples 2337:Eleassar 2304:Dicklyon 2295:MOS:CAPS 2291:MOS:DASH 2232:WP:MULTI 2184:X line: 2100:X Line: 2090:X Line: 2084:X Line: 1980:Thanks, 1954:FGC line 1880:map_type 1856:category 1848:category 1836:disabled 1593:engineer 1583:operator 1577:another 1574:another 1559:Generic 1525:Category 1459:WP:CREEP 1116:on paper 995:VIA Rail 748:cameras. 714:project. 691:deficit. 482:cite web 414:contribs 402:unsigned 273:and the 2849:Jcody21 2528:Pattern 2371:Pattern 2262:Triomio 2217:Triomio 2191:Other: 1784:‎Dl2000 1718:hostler 1715:shunter 1668:freight 1489:classes 1400:Mjroots 948:(Speak) 886:library 731:inside. 553:(Speak) 511:(Speak) 436:(Speak) 426:and is 382:(Speak) 151:on the 2820:Otr500 2721:PRRfan 2676:â±·< 2402:Length 2243:rose64 2013:Liam98 1985:Liam98 1884:Rhadow 1812:Dl2000 1796:Rhadow 1790:, and 1533:Rhadow 1467:Rhadow 1414:Alumni 1373:Rhadow 1317:Rhadow 1269:Hello 1192:WP:IAR 1129:Panama 1091:Rkitko 1081:Rkitko 1071:above 1043:. ---- 1037:UPDATE 1021:. ---- 1009:, and 999:Amtrak 975:Trains 944:Slambo 549:Slambo 507:Slambo 432:Slambo 378:Slambo 280:Trains 200:Trains 174:using 124:Essays 76:Essays 53:scale. 2671:: --> 2414:Desc. 2335:). -- 2059:DanTD 2041:Al E. 1964:? or 1907:DanTD 1860:class 1665:goods 1662:goods 1658:cargo 1615:guard 1612:guard 1587:pilot 1529:Grade 1521:Class 1506:Quora 1450:every 1369:minor 1365:small 1361:major 1353:major 1340:Major 1257:DanTD 1045:DanTD 1023:DanTD 786:DanTD 767:DanTD 696:said. 641:pull. 620:link( 596:plaws 531:plaws 469:plaws 45:This 16:< 2853:talk 2824:talk 2741:talk 2725:talk 2637:talk 2388:Name 2360:talk 2327:and 2325:this 2308:talk 2293:and 2281:talk 2266:talk 2247:talk 2230:Per 2221:talk 2063:talk 2037:MARC 2001:The 1936:and 1911:talk 1888:talk 1868:and 1816:talk 1800:talk 1687:halt 1537:talk 1513:2019 1491:and 1471:talk 1424:and 1416:and 1404:talk 1377:talk 1351:and 1342:and 1321:talk 1261:talk 1218:talk 1154:talk 1049:talk 1027:talk 1017:and 923:#=- 882:talk 866:#=- 862:-=# 819:talk 790:talk 771:talk 578:cite 524:cite 410:talk 176:data 2786:or 2690:. 2241:Red 1942:FGC 1858:or 1834:or 1832:ADA 1367:or 1359:or 1312:or 1276:not 1171:NE2 1106:NE2 1075:in 1015:AMT 981:NE2 964:NE2 840:to 367:NE2 143:Low 2867:: 2855:) 2826:) 2798:, 2794:, 2769:)" 2743:) 2727:) 2672:ⱷ҅ 2659:— 2649:→ 2639:) 2631:. 2612:. 2540:D 2460:≠ 2451:≠ 2383:D 2362:) 2356:KU 2310:) 2283:) 2268:) 2249:) 2223:) 2181:.) 2177:- 2065:) 1913:) 1890:) 1818:) 1802:) 1792:FR 1786:, 1777:* 1752:* 1727:* 1702:* 1677:* 1652:* 1627:* 1602:* 1539:) 1504:. 1473:) 1426:RS 1406:) 1396:RS 1394:x 1390:= 1379:) 1323:) 1263:) 1220:) 1169:-- 1156:) 1135:, 1051:) 1029:) 1005:, 1001:, 979:-- 962:-- 892:) 888:| 884:| 852:: 821:) 792:) 773:) 591:}} 585:{{ 581:}} 575:{{ 527:}} 521:{{ 505:. 499:}} 493:{{ 485:}} 479:{{ 412:‱ 308:/ 203:: 2851:( 2822:( 2810:. 2778:( 2771:. 2739:( 2723:( 2674:ᎄ 2669:Âą 2666:☏ 2635:( 2537:C 2534:B 2531:A 2380:C 2377:B 2374:A 2358:( 2306:( 2279:( 2264:( 2245:( 2219:( 2167:) 2145:) 2135:) 2125:) 2097:) 2061:( 2018:7 1990:7 1932:( 1909:( 1886:( 1814:( 1798:( 1774:* 1771:* 1749:* 1746:* 1724:* 1721:* 1712:* 1699:* 1696:* 1674:* 1671:* 1649:* 1646:* 1624:* 1621:* 1599:* 1596:* 1535:( 1515:. 1469:( 1428:. 1422:V 1402:( 1392:V 1388:N 1375:( 1319:( 1259:( 1216:( 1194:. 1152:( 1047:( 1025:( 910:. 880:( 817:( 788:( 769:( 408:( 361:( 333:. 277:. 155:. 121:. 59:: 26:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Trains
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Trains/Manual of style
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Essays
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays
Knowledge (XXG) essays
discussion
essay directory
Low
project's impact scale
Note icon
automatically assessed
data
WikiProject icon
Trains
Article maintenance
WikiProject icon

Trains Portal
WikiProject Trains
rail transport
project page
discussion
WikiProject Trains to do list
Trains Portal
Taskforce icon
the Article maintenance task force

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑