Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 28

931:

one, it means "Brain Age" is being used five times more than "Brain Training", and common sense indicates we should use it. I already countered the IGN argument, but I do it again: we have a few extremely big American sites like IGN, GameSpot and 1Up, and then a few extremely big European sites like CVG, Eurogamer and Kikizo. Any doubt which group covers most of the market share? It is a pity that we have American focused names, yes, but common sense indicates we should go with the most known name. If Bob googles for a game, he is most likely to hit IGN or GameSpot before Eurogamer for most queries. You know what a high Alexa ranking means? That most John Generic Bobs that use Internet Explorer and an Alexa ware use them than others. That is the kind of people who need help finding articles.

4154:

I have to run that before I can run the downloaded game, so if PS3 downloadable titles are "Direct Downloads", then the term cannot refer to the lack of installer. What I bet is the case is that "direct" of direct download means no requirement of external storage medium, but marketing probably likes it too because customers get the connotation that the data travels faster due to lack of some vague "middle man" to slow it down. Of course, I'm sure Andre only meant the question to be rhetorical, but I couldn't help but wrap my head around it. Best to just stick to "Download" for media, no ambiguity there.

1151:

readers on the English Knowledge (XXG) would expect to see the game listed in the VG by year cat around 1990 or 1991, as that's when it came out in North America and Europe. There is real potential for confusion here. Categorizing the game for 1990 only or 1991 only is no good either, because that's clearly POV in favor of North America (if 1990 is chosen) or Europe (if 1991 is chosen). And of course, there are hundreds of other games with similar issues. Multiple year categories solve all these sticky problems without creating any additional problems. --

4000:(PlayStation Network, Downloadable Game). Is "Direct Download" good enough? Should it be Xbox Live Arcade or PlayStation Network (not Store, wouldn't want to encourage section linking) depending on which the game is available through (this would assume that each service is the medium through which the game gets to users, seems valid to me)? I'm just looking for some consensus. If someone knows how to turn this into a poll or this has already been decided on, please do so or point me in the right direction respectively. Thanks. 999:. popularity is impossible to accurately and objectively state. The only grey area i see is when an english translation gets different names in two different countries and is released at the same time. i suppose it should then just go onto a first-come first-served basis. popularity and sales can vary over time, are we to move the article whenever that happens? as for release dates, i like chrono better b/c then we don't need extra code in infoboxes to distinguish countries (i.e. 114:. The issue with MobyGames is that about 5500 links of the 6500 links to this website seem to have been added by the sites founders and various sock accounts. Everyone is happy to accept your view that appropriate links to the site need to be kept but can we give some thought to the acceptability of this kind of large scale link insertion, substantial to currently empty pages, by people declared to have a conflict of interest? What should be done with all these spammed links? -- 4558:, which they do aknowledge to be unofficial. Officially, there is no Soul Blazer series. In the press, there's one magazine, Hardcore Gaming 101, which happens to have written an article about what they think can be called the "Soul Blazer series". It's just an opinion. So, since it's unofficial, I moved the sentences about the "series" from the introduction of the articles to a Reception section further down in the article. That's where it belongs. 31: 3328:. The game features a lot of characters, but I don't see a need for listing every voice actor. Look at movie articles in comparision: for animated films, there isn't massive lists of everyone that did a voice. I've removed the massive list from the example I listed a few times over the course of months. But it usually gets re-added, and my suggestion of just listing the main voice actors is just ignored. 3805:

etc. I mean that peaple are always erasing things like, "If the creature is under pain, an insect emerges from it's hide". To me thats a physical characteristic. While I'm on the subject, why not make another Wiki site that is for guides, cheats, etc. Not one thats specific like an RE4 Wiki though. Also some parts of that article do need cleaning.--

1188:. The important factor is when it was created, not when it was sold in country Y. The differences between release years can be covered in the article. So I propose that this is the consensus we push for - That VG year categories are the year that the game was originally created (with obvious allowances for major re-writes/re-releases) - 1575:. Of course, many were uploaded before this was a necessity and the boilerplate was considered sufficient, and most actually are FU. Deletions theoretically restart on July 1, and there are still plenty sitting there. It'll take a lot of work to sort through 'em, but it'll be much easier if a bunch of people each do a little. 3043:, you shouldn't have an issue finding significant out-of-universe information to establish notability of groupings of characters (I.E. recurring characters, and then casts of characters for each game). Remember: not every detail has to be listed, and every character shouldn't be given a picture (we don't substitute the game). — 1579:

public domain, there's generally no alternative that's also accurate, and unlike a work of art where that's all there is to it, box images are a trivial part of a game/book/movie as a whole. So, while annoying, it shouldn't be that hard to go around and make certain that box cover images have rationales on them (perhaps using

4310:

Why? I don't see a huge need for that template. E3 is a big event, but I don't think tagging articles with a template for a brief time does much. At least with future game tag, it's on the article for months to years (as games are announced a while before they actually come out). With this tag: it's

4153:

Heh, I guess an "indirect" download would be like downloading through a proxy, though I doubt anyone's ever put this much thought into it. Melodia, your guess about an install would be good, but PS3 d/l games wouldn't pass that. Every one I've downloaded puts an install module into my games category,

3804:

Good point. What I'm trying to say is not that people should list where secrets are and how to diffeat bosses and such, but rather facts, like how something's back is vulnerable to gunfire in my opinion is a physical characteristic. I agree that people shouldn't put things like a boss is defeated buy

2935:

Most of these articles about a single character would wind up heading off to "Articles for Deletion" if I had my way. Such characters usually aren't notable outside the game(s) and themselves have no third party information sources. I would much rather see them in a "List of..." article, if there's

2874:

Howdy folks. If any of you have ever perused any of the Suikoden articles, you will see that there is a vast amount of information, but also a vast amount of disarray. Some of the information isn't entirely encyclopedic, and needs serious cleanup. That's why I'm interested in creating a Suikoden Task

2254:

No one has voted since June 14! I think that it's a good part of the project and a great way to expand and improve articles on gaming, but we need the participation of many people involved in the Video Games project in order for this to work as intended. I would like to see a new Gaming Collaboration

1578:

Anyway, I bring this up because things like game covers, book covers, movie packages, album covers, etc. are all really easy to add FU rationales for and in fact were used by Jimbo Wales as an example of where fair use for simply identifying the product obviously applies. Unless the cover is already

1140:

This is a rather nitpicky issue, but if we're only going to categorize by the original release year, we should do the same for the system cats. It makes no sense whatsoever to be "redundant" across system cats but not year cats. Can anyone list a reason justifying multiple system cats that wouldn't

930:

I disagree with a couple of points mentioned here because they just forget about "common sense". We should always use the article name that is most likely to be queried. English Google hits determine which name is most likely to be accessed. If "Brain Age" gets five millions hits and "Brain Training"

851:

comment, since I don't know much about it. From what I can gather from the article, the game was made in Canada, correct? And the canadian title will just be Mario Strikers, right? (Meaning, the country of origin is english-speaking. And the english version of the game will officially be named "Mario

815:

And may I ask, what do you think of Mario Strikers Charged? There is certainly no case to be made that the NA version or the JP version is the primary, official, or original version - the EU version is. Really, the fact that it has been released in EU for months before the NA version will be shows no

535:

Success and popularity CAN be brought up as a factor. They may not be winning arguments, but they're most definitely factors. If one name is attributed to a version praised for its success and another name is attributed to a version that is scorned as being not successful enough, that should be taken

528:

Clarify that "we should stick with the original title" is a TIE BREAKER argument. It cannot be the definitive argument that one side can use to stop the debate, it must be used solely for the purpose of deciding what to do when there is no reason to use either or their is an equal amount of reason to

4577:

there was this game for the NES. I can't remember what it was called, but I know that you were in charge of a space colony (or something like that), and you had to build ore refineries, defense systems, space ships, oxygen generators, and stuff like that. I was horrible at it, so I'd like to give it

4464:

I was going to edit the pages myself, however my knowledge of wikipedia's inner workings is pretty minute. But I really don't want to see disinformation being left on these articles, as being many people will read the information I mentioned as "Fact" since it is on Knowledge (XXG) as well as go to

3535:

She has appeared in only a few games (from what I can tell), that's certainly not much to go on when making an article. A merge into a list/lists should happen. If she somehow becomes a more notable character, then the article for her should be fine. Until then: it should be redirected to a list, in

3098:

Myself, I've rewritten & merged the articles associated with Suikoden 3 and 5, and did some work on 4, but someone more familiar with Suikoden I & II needs to work on those articles (and merging the associated character articles). This proposal has come up before; I set out the tasks that I

2277:

As mentioned the project is dead and already we did have a survey and more than a few editors agreed that we should let the GCOTW die as there is just not enough participation. Now I will see if I can maybe encourage a few new editors into trying out the GCOTW but I say at this point just let it die

2150:

It's vandalism. Announce it in some forum, but Knowledge (XXG) is not meant for someone's side projects. Even if it was an existant product, it would not pass the notability rules. I'm not going to the talk page since PresN took care of that, but I want people to know that people are looking out for

1708:

of you are actually discussing it. Protection isn't intended to stop edit-warring between only two parties. And semi-protecting would favour one side over the other. In any event, just start a discussion on the talk page; if nobody engages in proper discussion after a reasonable period of time, then

1072:

I tried to find the old discussion in the archive: but couldn't. Anyway: I recall the consensus was only the original release year to be used for a category. The infobox lists them all fine already. I got a message on my talk page from an editor that disagrees. So I've had to revert his edits of the

4486:

You don't have to be a master of Knowledge (XXG) to edit. You should feel at liberty to edit things yourself — even if you're new to Knowledge (XXG). It seems quite an obscure subject, so I doubt many editors here will be able to distinguish between what is right or not as not many will have played

3657:

I'm sick of people erasing things like, "you must shoot it in the face," because they say it is game guide advice. It's not. If someone lists a whole long battle sequence detailing every little thing, than by all means erase it. Small facts about a creatures appearance of weaknesses however are the

3385:

are the closest I can find. Neither mention credits specifically, though there must be something in it otherwise we'd have endless movie articles listing makeup artists and whoever made the tea on set. Did you suggest on the article's talk page that it should be trimmed to just the most significant

3217:

It seems that the CVG template can automatically tell when it is placed in a non-article (or at least a category or template), as it does not list the article as unassessed, but it does not automatically change "article" to "non-article". Can that be changed? It would be convenient and reliable, as

2596:

based on NoE's page (which doesn't actually say anything that would back up his given date). He seems to use multiple accounts, and seems to be stalking me with the intention of reverting pro-EU edits. Could an administrator look at the following contributions and consider blocking these accounts?:

2259:

The collaboration of the week is pretty much dead. Maybe we should properly phase it out. The group of editors concerned over the CVG space have very different interests and objectives, this project itself is no longer as focused on article writing and editing per se, but on matters of policy and

1228:

I disagree with labelling the categories "Games created in year x" though. Created is too vague. Take Final Fantasy XII, was it really "created in 2006"? No, its creation spans a long period which goes from 2001 all the way to 2006. Perhaps the categories should be "Games first published in year x"

934:

Personally, I would prefer going with the easier names (that are the names that appear in search engines most of the times). Japanese games should stay with their Japanese name, creating as many redirects for every name used in the gaming media, until an official name is released. If the EU name is

578:

I'm not sure if you can really make guidelines for what people use for arguments, but I definitely agree that English titles need to be given primacy over Japanese ones, there should be no abbreviations, and release dates should be listed in order of release. This is the English Knowledge (XXG) and

1425:

The reference says, "The game is FREEWARE as we checked with the former distributors BRODERBUND and MINDSCAPE, who do not have any copies of the game left. Thus you may download three different versions of the game from our site." That isn't a description of freeware. Abandonware, perhaps, but not

1355:

Multiple categories shouldn't be used if it's just to signify a long pause between diferent release dates. Multiple years shouldn't be used for standard things that happen during conversion from one format to another eg language translation or conversion to using the DS touch pad, these are normal

1150:

Additionally, there are also some practical problems with the "only one year category" policy which are rather unique to video games, so a "films don't do it" defense isn't really justified. Take Super Mario Bros. 3. It was originally released in 1988, but that was in Japan; the vast majority of

859:

To be honest, I think that's a reasonable argument for keeping it as-is. We're not talking about a japanese game that also has english titles. We're talking about a Canadian game that also has alternate english and japanese titles. (Unless, of course, I'm missing something. In which case, I'm more

618:

My thoughts: since this is the English-language Knowledge (XXG), the English title should be used (assuming there is one). In cases where there are multiple English titles across regions, we should try to use the title the game is more popularly known by, with proper redirects established from all

4031:

I like Download too. How about the listing be "Download(size)". One problem, though, is that filesizes may vary based on the platform. flOw is likely larger in its PS3 version than the flash PC version. Maybe "Download-size(platform to which this size applies)" the () for platform is the standard

3497:

is an entirely nonnotable character in my opinion, with appearances in just two video games. However, this makes it difficult to merge – is she a DK character or a Mario character? Should it just be merged into the game of her first appearance? Should hse show up in both DK and Mario character

2989:

has enough to have one because he was the central character of the first game - thus there is plenty of information. Thus, I'm looking for a hand with this Task Force. I don't know how to make one - so I need help setting it up - and I also need extra hands for this sort of business - merging and

1437:

licensing of the game. That is, I believe wikipedia can only make unfettered use of images in a free context if the image is public domain, or GNU license compatible. That is, it isn't enough to say that people can spread the image; they also need to give permission for derivative works. (Or am I

1346:

As I said above if the remake warrants separate articles on WP then only one year should apply to each article(like the FF examples). If the game has had large improvements made to it - but not enough to warrant a separate article - then as long as the article explains those improvements there is

4472:

Anyway to wrap up, please look into removing or noting the factual information related to these articles (and even on the main page which is missing information about games they developed, which is found on their official home page, but not on the Wiki article and as main reference) Same for the

3901:

I'll admit the shoot it in the face example wasn't the best, but did you not reader my updated statment tha more clearly explains my thought. Saying something like a creature emerges from its hide after experiencing pain dons'nt tell you to do anything. It simple states a fact about the beast in

802:

THere is most definitely bias on Knowledge (XXG). Maybe some of the people aren't biased perse, but I've seen so much ignorance of EU versions and indifference (implying that the EU box art for Mario Strikers Charged is a "fake" box art almost, for one) that it continuously bothers me. I've seen

670:

Success is not a factor. Never has been, never could be. And let's explore why. Let's pick a random crappy movie: Striptease. (I know; I seem to only be able to think of stripper movies for these examples) It's a pretty well-known movie. It also didn't do so great. Let's say it's re-released for

350:

If there is also a non gaming series of x object, then obviously you should go with the third option. For example, for Pokemon you would go with Pokemon (video game series) and Pokemon (anime series) and so on.... (this has probably already been done and proved me wrong, but it's an example) --

1491:

If anyone cares to wander on down to the bottom of the main VG project page, there are a few FACs up currently that could really use people's comments/!votes, as no one is really voting. Please do read the articles first though, and vote as you see fit, as pile-on supports do no one any good.

1592:

More vexingly, many people didn't actually specify a source when they uploaded some of these covers. I've currently handwaved it some rationales I've added by noting that these images are a dime a dozen and easily replaced if someone wants to raise the issue, but as a long-term thing, perhaps

746:

This is one of those squishy matters. In general, english titles should trump japanese titles. However, there will always be cases where the english version is just trivial. (I don't have a games reference, but an anime reference is the fact that we have a Tekkaman Blade article, rather than a

4468:

And since there is only one fan site (in Japanese, which is linked from the main Quintet article) all subsequent information has been derived from that and is not a definitive, factual source to go by only what a fan surmised from their limited research (similar to the HG101 Quintet article)

4460:

The games in question (Soul Blazer, Illusion of Gaia, and Terranigma) have similar thematic elements and have been subsequently labeled a "trilogy" by fans, but as it stands other than the aforementioned shared elements and developer these games have nothing else in common to be considered a

3429:

Yes, I think these can be limited to voice actors for the primary characters only, similar to film articles. A link to the imdb would provide a full list for anybody interested. The exception would be if a minor role is played by a notable actor (for example, Patrick Stewart's small part in

1930:

I'd say it was a violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s fair use guidelines. There really wasn't anything in the text that the images were supporting, and you can't use fair use images to stand alone. Archiving all the covers is definitely a useful thing and would make a suitable subarticle on Next

1682:

Protection of the Picross article may be premature since neither of you have discussed it on the article's talk page yet (and there are only two editors involved-don't forget to watch out for 3rr, btw). However, protection of the brain age article may be warranted if it's removed again.

4106:

I assume 'drect download' probably refers to the fact you DL it right to the console without having to go through an install or anything (just a guess, I've never DLed a game to a console outside of bonus stuff on PSP). Personally, I'd call the medium "Digital", but that's just me...

2776:. Many of the links that were added by a couple of accounts are not useful (don't provide additional or corroborative information to the articles) and so should be removed. The rest, including those in 24 featured articles, should remain. There is no current consensus on what to do. 2317:

That was mentioned in the previous discussion about GCOW. Those that are willing should get to choose. Perhaps something along the lines of one per month with all of the research being pooled and then added to the article in one big quality edit with proper citations and notes. -

4456:

There is nothing of note on the main Quintet page, however as I mentioned on the article for The Granstream Saga there is mention of the "Soul Blazer Trilogy", which in fact is a fan originated term and was never something the original developers intended for it to be called.

2913:

And more stuff as I can come up with it. The only thing I don't know is how to set this up, either in a bureaucratic sense or in the sense of setting a page up and making it look nice. I'm looking for co-conspirators on this, so please let me know if you would like to help!

395:("When an article is put into a subcategory based on an attribute that is not the first thing most people would think of to categorise it, it should be left in the parent category as well"), I have begun including all games in these sub-categories in their parent categories 1314:

category and that year should be the original year of release on the original system in the original country of release. And that game articles should include every system category that the game was released for regardless of year. Has anyone got anything else to add? -

1259:

System categories should include every game released for that system. Year cats shouldn't include every re-release issued in that year. The different years, different regions issue isn't unique to games, in one of the linked discussions above, I've cited films such as

3686:

In my view, that is indeed game guide content. Even if it's minor advice: it's still not suitable for here. Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't be a game guide in any form at all. Tips, cheats, codes, weakness and so on: all game guide content not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).

4311:

just a temporary thing, that will just be removed after a little bit. I think it's just better to list updates as they come, and mention the update was from E3. I'm considering putting that template up for deletion, as it just serves a one-time a year/short purpose.

4452:

My comment isn't that the link mentioned references the voice acting, rather that it leads to the article on HG101 that contains erroneous and misleading information and to my knowledge a lot of this information has filtered its way onto the wikipedia articles.

1997:. I think the images are jarring in text, and the general audience will not know what it means. Regardless of the copyright status, I don't like seeing the image in articles. And a lesser point, currency symbols should be placed before the amount, ie £10. - 691:

You are assuming that I am saying "use success as a primary argument". I have never done so. Brain Age vs. Brain Training is an argument of two versions released close to eachother, Striptease vs. Nekkid is a case of a much later release in a different

2353:

series because it's a fairly popular horror survival game series and there's a lot of information out there on it, plus the framework for the series is already on Knowledge (XXG), including a template, but the articles just need to be cleaned up and

2328:

I would say that we have one more collaboration to finish off the project. I don't think though that the video game article would be a good choice. Maybe we can come up with a really bad game article or system article or video game company article.

3086:

Figures, since I've been out/busy lately. For what it's worth... it's great if you want to help, as there's a lot that needs to be done. That said, I can't see this matter as needing a Wikiproject, simply because there aren't enough people

3413:

I just listed it on the talk page. But overall, the talk page for the article isn't very active right now. I will try to go through the list and condense it, but I somehow think the same people will revert it back to the massive list though.

1593:

replacing those images of unclear source with known-source and non-watermarked images might be good. Other problems are easier to fix- I've noticed some orphaned and duplicated images, and those can just be sent to normal speedy deletion.

735:

The problem with Google hits is that they are regularly leaning towards NA. For instance, football is known throughout the world (outside of the US) as the Associated football, but Google hits states American football as being the primary

3143:

Is there a sister project it could go to? I actually think the main problem is that it's not referenced (or all that referenceable in the first place). Granted, I alas contributed to some of it...but I wouldn't be too sad to see it go.

2216:, then I would, but it would certainly be better left to someone who knows what they're doing! I'd suggest whining on here until someone does it; it worked for me. ;) Thanks for the review, I'll implement what you've suggested. Cheers, 548:

Article titles should be English-based if at all possible. Even if they are particularly less popular in the English regions versus the Japanese region, they should be used in place of the Japanese title. Transliterations should not be

3790:

The whole article needs cleanup of guide content in my opinion. Isn't there a Resident Evil Wiki out there? They could be fine with listing game guide information. Knowledge (XXG) simply isn't a place to list that fancruft content.

491:

Didn't spot that. But those -only categories are really poor, such an obvious hack. If only Knowledge (XXG) incorporated meta data or something to that effect which would make it easier to apply different rules to browse data. -

4010:

We don't need a poll, discussion should do fine. Download, and maybe the filesize if it's available, seems fine to me. I don't know what a Direct Download is, as compared to a regular download; what would an Indirect Download be?

1175:

category to a person every time they visited a new country for the first time? Obviously not, we are born and we are categorised by the year of our birth, and that's how I think games should be categorised, the category should be

3917:

There's currently a dispute between me and another editor over the naming of the Domark game F1/Formula One. I think the only way to resolve it is for someone independent to review the arguments and evidence presented on the

1474:, but there could easily be many more that are acceptable. In general, a screenshot of a game is going to end up under the same license as the game, unless the creator specifically makes an exception (e.g. as Ubisoft did). 1402:

in the game and add it to that car's article for pictoral reference. Stunts is freeware, but I'm not sure if that means I can make more screenshots of the game, nor use those screenshots elsewhere than the game article.

2767:

The other perspective is that there was a Conflict of Interest behind some of the links, but the people at fault didn't know (hadn't been notified/warned). The site is notable, as established by the references added at

3922:

of the article and confirm either way (or at least help decide on which we go on). I figured this Wikiproject was the best place to ask, so if anyone can spare a few moments to have look I'd be grateful. Many thanks

662:

I'm entirely fine with using the same writing style as the region's title. (That is, if Brain Age were successfully moved to Brain Training, I'd be fine with using commonwealth spellings) I don't think it should be

282: 1356:

processes that happen to most games and are, on the whole not noteworthy occurrences. Allowances are going to have to be made for some articles but 99% will be covered by a single year, it's mainly to avoid having

390:

Due to the lack of concensus in the discussion on the merging of the "system-only games" subcats with their parents here: , and several users feeling that all-inclusion would be preferable, and indeed in line with

1170:

in the Romance, Crime and Thriller sections, it wouldn't happen the book is filed by it's main characteristic. Forget video games for a second, imagine we're talking about people's biographies. Would we add a new

3065:, in terms of the layout I would suggest you look at the other task forces that already exist and emulate them. If there are no major objections it will be accepted. There are no real bureaucratic procedures, so 2123:! It doesn't matter if you're a guy or girl, making up nonsense and putting it in an article is vandalism! Have a nice day! (I'm putting a warning on the user's page, just as soon as I find the right template.) 671:

another market (It's already been released in the US and UK, so let's say Australia). For the re-release, it's also renamed to, "Nekkid". Imagine that it somehow did really well in Australia. Proportionately,

1438:

misinterpreting the rules?) That said, if the 'freeware' game in question were to explicitly allow total distribution and derivative works, then it seems like you could use as many screenshots as you wished.

900:

an entirely different situation. In the first, neither of the english titles are from the country of origin. In the second, the north american title is also the official title in the country of origin. That

1843:

Should it be having a long charater list within the article like that? I believe that there should be a separate character article, although that would leave the main article pretty bare. I am referring to

2014:

I hope you don't mind, but I cited you and some of the others I'd found who had tried discussing the image with JAF1970 in the discussion there. There has been some additional discussion of the image at

552:

Length should not be a factor - we don't shorten article titles just for convenience. We may use a shorter official version, but not an abbreviation (ie, using Brain Age instead of its full title is an

1096:

I don't know what consensus was, but did it address multiple release dates? As in re-released years later or released in different places in different years? I don't really care, but I see the logic.--

2705:, a look at the source and a reference to its place in an article, a good cite can be developed easily. It'll only take 30 seconds, and makes the article much more professional very easily. Thanks 743:

The japanese title should only be considered for very special cases. In general, unless mentioning the japanese title makes the articles themselves easier to understand, they don't matter at all.

542:

Google hits are not a reliable argument, as they are by default in favor of NA by the fact that video game web sites are mostly NA-dominated (with IGN, GameSpot, and 1UP having high Alexa ranks).

2821: 1571:

This is more a Knowledge (XXG)-wide thing, but figured I'd drop off a reminder here... as many probably know, there is still a huge gigantic backlog of images uploaded without FU rationales at

607:

Strongly agree on the "we should stick with the original title" needing a rewrite. First come first served is an awful approach. Agree on all the other proposals you've put down there too. --

545:

Sharing the original Japanese title is only an accompany argument. It cannot be the sole argument - it's merely an extra. If you don't have any primary arguments, then this should not be used.

2367:

Maybe we should just do Basic Game Mechanics as it was the winning candidate. If everyone agrees I will go ahead and start the nomination and will let it continue till Thursday of next week.

645:. Since it's an official guideline, and is intended to be followed in most instances, it seems like the most logical choice if you want to create a general 'rule of thumb' for article titles. 589:. I don't agree about Google hits -- although the Google test is not necessarily the end-all be-all of naming conventions, it's definitely useful to judge the pervasiveness of a given name. 2305:

Hey, Basic game mechanics should be. Why don't we just set up a group of people who go around to articles of THEIR choice (and with input from others)? It wouldn't be official of course. -

458:

states this is the correct way, so I didn't really see there being any point of a further CFD. There are also literally hundreds of precedents in categories all over Knowledge (XXG), e.g.

4449:

I was looking over the Quintet games article and subsequently went to the article on The Granstream Saga which referenced a link to Hardcore Gaming 101's article on Quintet themselves.

2890:. I'd like to make these pages the norm of Suikoden characters, and only have full articles about extremely significant characters - if you're a series vet, I'm talking about folks like 1333:

version of the game was released? The fact that this remake has its own article may or may not be relevant, since many remakes precisely don't have their own articles. See for instance

167:

Struck, I simply don't have time anytime soon, plus the non-alphabetical nature of the whatlinkshere list makes it a lot harder. Whatever happens will be up to the TfD's closing admin (

4465:

the article at HG101 and believe that to be true as well since it is a respectable site and one that is known for well researched and truthful articles, except in this specific case.

935:

released first, then the article should be moved to it. However, if the American name differs, and Google determines it is more common than the European name, it should be moved again.

1921:

which deals with a lot of fair use image questions. Bottom line is that if a fair use image is there with no critical commentary, it's a no-no. Galleries are frowned upon as well. --

3881: 3288:

is confusing to bots and it generate double interwiki entries in categories. I think this current template isn't usefull at all and could be a good thing to subst and remove it. --

1604: 320: 4406: 1630: 399:, and also adding any relevant titles I notice along the way to the "only" sub-cats also. If anyone has any reason for objecting, please note here or on my talk page. Thanks, 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4476:

Sorry for the longwinded explanation I just wanted to make myself clear on the issues that need to be cleared up to make wikipedia as accurate as it should be. Thanks Again.

789:

editors here might be acting in good faith? Or that the rules shouldn't be ignored whenever you personally disagree with them? Or that you should try to make article changes

2791: 2787: 1114: 884:

A japanese game, with a japanese title, is given two different (regional) english titles for release. The question is which of two english titles to use, when, technically,

781:

And, more importantly, you're very obviously (and I'd say, admittedly) trying to address what you perceive to be a problem with bias. But the biggest problem is that you're

168: 4473:

articles on Soul Blazer, the Soul Blazer series (which specifically mentions the erronious HG101 article as Fact), Illusion of Gaia, Terranigma, and The Granstream Saga.

3558: 1329:

be considered released in 2007 because that's when the remake/port/whatever-you-call-it was released, or should it be considered released in 1997 because that's when the

2702:

Can everyone just check that when adding citations, particularly web ones, that they complete it as best they can. Its not hard to create a good one, with a quick copy

1983:

as an alternative to "Microsoft Points" in article text for various articles. Few editors have commented so far, and I'd appreciate some other opinions on the matter.

4519:

You might also consider emailing HG101 with this information. If they're a respectable site then I'm sure they'll want to remove the inaccuracies from their article.

955:

While "common sense" might indicate we go with the entry most likely to be entered, that hardly means we should necessarily go with it. Should we move the article to

619:

other title(s). Popularity can be established by sales. Really, as long as the readers can find the article, what it's called should be the least of our concerns. --

832:, we don't move articles unless there's a very clearcut reason for it. What's more, when it comes to stylistic versions of titles, we don't move them unless there's 3953: 3674: 1471: 2754:

I was under the impression that all the Moby links were supposed to be removed, as it's a non-notable site , and the links were placed in a giant spamming effort

1760: 2037: 1903:

and removed them. I was wanting to know the VG project's opinion on the matter rather than one editor's interepretation of policy. You can find the disscussion

3965:

That site seems to be mainly for game info, not guide content. It is also difficult to find any info since most of the pages are full of placeholder text. --

3062: 2390:

Well someone should do it. I don't think Jacoplane can update it regularly. We are standing over a dying man with a defibrillator and no one can do anything.--

2247: 181: 111: 2879:

Create a single, coherent list of stars (characters) that shows recurrences, overlaps, and relationships between them - currently, there are several of these.

556:

Release dates should always be in order of release - do not put them in order of region (for instance, if someone decided to make a Madden article go JP : -->

4246:

What useful information does this give that you wouldn't already have from the "platform" category though?(Really not against this, would just like a reason)

3193:

Yuck, nominate as indiscriminate list! Gotta agree with X201 as well, fancy missing out one of the greatest uses of Ride of the Valkyries in gaming history!

2882:

Create list pages for all of the stars - currently, some characters have their own pages when, in reality, they are barely noteable enough to have them (see

2418:

Or, because of the lack of participation, maybe we could have a collaboration project on a particular game until it makes it out of stub/poor grade status?

1389:

I wanted to know if freeware is restricted by the generally-accepted "one in-game screenshot" rule? Indeed, if it is freeware, does that restrict anything?

675:

than it did in north america (wouldn't be hard to accomplish). Would that then mean that the Striptease article should be renamed? It certainly wouldn't be

3519:

I think the reason why she hasn't been merged thus far is because of the ambiguity, and her sheer age as a charcter. I'm not sure if a merge is necessary.

3508:

She leans towards being a Mario character more it seems, but has ties with Donkey Kong as well. Putting her in both lists should be the best way to do it.

2058:

article. Just thought that since, you know, a sizeable number of CVG articles link to it, it would be wise to notify the group here. Thanks for your time!

1809:

Overall (from what I've seen), alot of them need cleanup. Lots of them include game guide content in some form at least. In a recent example: I cleaned up

1517:

I placed it there earlier, as it's been inactive for months. Perhaps it could be made into a taskforce (if there is enough interest). The link to the MFD:

1326: 1756: 4487:

it. To wrap things up, if you can write this post on Knowledge (XXG), then you should be able to edit out fallacies if you have taken such an interest.

2902:, and whatnot. It will require some hashing out and discussing who should still have their own pages, but I'd be willing to defer to consensus on that. 891:

An english language game is made with an english language title ("Mario Strikers Charged"). It also has an alternate english title for another region.

683:

of games, movies, and probably even books that everybody's heard of, but few people have purchased. This isn't a measure of how recognizable they are.

4609: 1813:

a little earlier, but it needs work still. Also, does anyone know if Rune Factory is for DS only, or for the Wii as well? I noticed it listed on the

47: 17: 2040:

and check out the discussion page. The section titled "Think about this" is where the dispute is at... outside opinions would be helpful. Thanks!

3980:

I haven't seen it anywhere and a quick look reveals no standard agreement on a media listing for downloadable titles. A few I've looked at include

1310:

There have been no complaints or additions to this discussion so can it be taken as read that everyone accepts that each game should have only one

896:

Even if you want to argue that being released first is a valid enough reason to move the article, I should hope you'll still acknowledge that it's

3727:

Why include information like that anyway? If it's not game-guide, then it's just minutiae — Knowledge (XXG) isn't for fans of a given article.

3468: 3463: 1372:

Are there any objections or questions? Am I ok to change the wording of the category to specify the first published year as mentioned above? -

938:

In the end, though, with redirects being cheap, I would not mind the result of the discussion, as long as consensus is reached (you can create

1900: 1787: 3472: 521:

We need a reform. There is far too much opposition to any title that doesn't adhere to NA naming conventions or Japanese naming conventions.

2516:

Such a thing is not appropriate for Knowledge (XXG). You should look for a site related to console modding and start your discussion there.

1692:

The IP certainly knows of me, since he references my "ideals and convictions". If he reverts again, I think semi-protection is warranted. -

758:

and recognizable title is ideal. (And there are occasions where 'common names' trump 'official names' in MoS. Though I don't know if that's

3763: 1845: 1810: 1238:

Yep, a definite, clear cut statement like "Games first published in year x" is what it needs. "Created" could be open to interpretation. -

1518: 1166:

Multiple year categories ruins the whole point of having categories in the first place, it's like going to the local library and finding

3949: 3670: 3455: 3091:. I think it's been well-known what needs to be done for some time, but there aren't enough editors into it. The parlous state of the 2841:

That "discussion" has turned in to an argument and will remain so unless someone else intervenes and offers an alternative perspective.

2376:

I think it doesn't need to have another week. It's already been there for two weeks and should have been the GCOTW in the first week. -

2213: 2200: 2099:

Hello everybody, I'm A legend. And I'm announcing the Ultradog! It doesn't matter if you're a guy or girl, you can help extend my stub!

2072:

There's a discussion going on about whether the current (north american) or european title for the game should be used for the article.

278: 3247: 3006:

expanded - currently, there are only ~19 characters on that list. I'd say that almost all but 10 should be on that list. My two cents.

201:

Apparently, the person with the above name shares it with a record producer and several others and we are getting emails about this at

1351:

categories, it could be confusing if there were two years with a massive gap between them and no explanation as to why in the article.

1058: 1049: 2644: 1918: 2545: 1583: 803:

very, very few examples of an article being EU-based when appropriate, and any attempt to fix this is met with severe opposition. -

206: 1764: 1467: 3703:

Those pages aren't allowed to have game guide content either. Describe the creatures, but don't give tips on how to defeat them.

939: 700:

Which version is released first isn't really a valid criteria. And that's probably why it isn't listed in MoS as a valid criteria.

3835: 2340:

Silk purse from a sows ear? Yeah I'm game. Find the worst CVG article (obviously one that we can find info on) and go to work. -

1287:

for instance, you get 1997 for Japan and 1999 for the US. I'm sure many movies in both directions have differing years as well.

1110: 959:(no accent)? i personally often rely on an article's title for the correct spelling, form, and version of a subject. This means 464:"Cat:FA Premier League", and "Cat:English Football Clubs". These game-related categories have simply not been handled properly. 4235: 1729: 281:

with the goal of eventually getting it up to FA status. Since I've run out of ideas to improve the article, I submitted it for

3600:

I'm not convinced that this article is valid. I'm not going to vote yet, but I can't really see why this article should stay.

3113: 3945: 3903: 3871: 3870:

Cool, thanks. Neat site. Not much on it though. It still dosen't addres my physical characteristic idea though. But thanks.--

3806: 3754: 3715: 3666: 3156:

Indiscriminate list. They also missed Ride of the Valkyries from Full Throttle. A deletable offence if ever there were one.-

2507: 2460: 1669:

An IP is refusing to allow for European box arts to be used in these two articles. Could an administrator semi-protect it? -

581: 3714:

Read the Del Lago paragraph on the RE4 page (link above) and tell me if there's anything wrong with it (game advice wise).--

836:

reason to do so. This goes both ways. You won't see the article listed as simply "Soccer" without someone coming up with an

4365:

is probably enough, or maybe we can have a template for all big industry events? I can see its use however, articles like

2469:

Asking one of the project leaders is a good way to do it, because they'll decide whether your task force is needed or not.

1572: 716:

Google hits are not the be-all and end-all. I'll concede that much. Generally speaking, Google should only be used to show

4506: 3781: 3742: 2856: 1904: 1863: 773:

style used across articles (eg. alphabetical: European Union, Japan, North America), but chronological seems fine as well.

4588:

Unfortunately, this is outside the scope of discussions here. Might I suggest one of the retrogaming site forums? Try

3018: 3003: 2991: 2937: 2926: 2887: 4170:

I'm in favour of "Download" but not keen on having the size, I don't think it's needed and is heading towards WP:NOT -

3697: 840:

good reason. When it comes to stylistic choices, we're supposed to handle them on a case by case basis, and moves will

642: 638: 3884:, which specifically sets forth guidelines forbidding the inclusion of content like, "you must shoot it in the face." 2999: 2906: 2081: 2075: 1931:

Generation, but outside of what Knowledge (XXG) allows. Incidentally, you can find all the Next Generation covers at

785:. You're assuming there's a problem, and expect people to try to 'fix' that problem. Has it ever occurred to you that 319:

Dunno, but see also this dead discussion which proposed that actual franchises be named franchises instead of series:

2995: 1360:

appear in 1985,1986, 1992 and 2007 when all four are the same game, and just the format or system are different. -

679:

known as "Nekkid", in the sense that it was more recognizable by that title. And, if you think about it, there are a

215: 2949:

The problem is usually more the opposite in my experience, with the character articles growing extremely bloated. --

2562:

I think it could, yeah. Looks like it just needs a reference section and an expanded lead. I went ahead and added

2479:

Well, I wan't a task force that mods the Nintendo GameCube! --The source of the cosmos... 01:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

869:

It was released in Australia and Europe before any other region, so we're giving the title to an unreleased game. -

2723:

needs its MobyGames link fixed, but I don't know how to do this. It currently says *{{moby game|id=/auto assault}}

2657: 1036:

English speaking country of origin (First official english title i.e. if a US company releases a game in UK first,

38: 4554:

It's not that "Hardcore Gaming 101" is lying or saying something inaccurate, it's just that they're stating their

2673: 2634: 2380: 2309: 1831: 1696: 1673: 873: 820: 807: 569: 3366: 3325: 3284: 3262: 3254: 2592:

There's been a vandal going around removing/altering non-NA information, such as changing the European dates for

1956:, only 1 cover image is needed in the article. Remember that fair use pics are supposed to be kept to a minimum. 155:, over the next few days. I'll check off the letters that I've been through below, please feel free to help me :) 2482:

Wait, do you want a task force that writes articles fr existing mods, or do you want a task force to make mods?

1732:? The plot summary section doesn't sound like a normal plot summary. Should it be there? It doesn't comply with 1087:

One year is enough. Films and music albums use only one year, I don't see why video games would be different. --

4616: 4603: 4582: 4562: 4541: 4510: 4480: 4436: 4413: 4390: 4381: 4350: 4341: 4328: 4315: 4304: 4276: 4260: 4240: 4209: 4192: 4174: 4162: 4140: 4131: 4111: 4099: 4075: 4036: 4022: 4004: 3985: 3969: 3957: 3927: 3906: 3895: 3874: 3861: 3841: 3809: 3795: 3785: 3757: 3746: 3718: 3707: 3691: 3678: 3642: 3611: 3591: 3571: 3540: 3530: 3512: 3502: 3438: 3418: 3408: 3373: 3360: 3332: 3313: 3292: 3273: 3226: 3207: 3197: 3188: 3160: 3148: 3138: 3123: 3107: 3052: 3034: 3021: 2976: 2958: 2944: 2929: 2860: 2835: 2807: 2798: 2758: 2748: 2734: 2709: 2692: 2676: 2664: 2651: 2637: 2581: 2556: 2536: 2520: 2486: 2473: 2422: 2399: 2383: 2371: 2358: 2344: 2333: 2322: 2312: 2300: 2282: 2272: 2238: 2207: 2193: 2155: 2142: 2132: 2109: 2089: 2062: 2044: 2023: 2009: 1987: 1960: 1947: 1925: 1911: 1896: 1880: 1867: 1834: 1821: 1799: 1771: 1749: 1713: 1699: 1687: 1676: 1658: 1648: 1641: 1597: 1560: 1550: 1525: 1506: 1496: 1478: 1455: 1442: 1410: 1376: 1364: 1341: 1319: 1300: 1291: 1278: 1242: 1233: 1211: 1192: 1155: 1145: 1131: 1105: 1091: 1081: 1062: 946: 913: 876: 864: 823: 810: 797: 623: 611: 600: 572: 506: 486: 445: 421: 373: 345: 336: 327: 313: 299: 289: 260: 249: 242: 236: 225: 188: 175: 161: 121: 1872:

If any of that game guide info is salvageable, can you tell me which pages and I can perhaps move the info to

3240: 2670: 2631: 2377: 2306: 1980: 1828: 1693: 1670: 870: 817: 804: 566: 3577:

It's not going very well, but I think it's a valid article that just needs expanding (as any stubs do). The

3459: 135: 3941: 3662: 2495: 2448: 532:

If an article uses an English title, it should adhere to the appropriate writing style based on the region.

4359: 2395: 2296: 2164: 1101: 3378: 1451:

It appears to have fallen into freeware status, but is not yet liberated ( example: LiberatedGames.com )

1422:

If I'm reading the cited reference for the 'freeware' claim correctly, then the game isn't even freeware.

1077:. Unless I missed something: I don't think the editor is correct on this. What does everyone else think? 369: 4599: 3937:

Yeah, it's a nice site but there's not much on it. It needs your contributing help. Contributers! Away!

3092: 2593: 2152: 2016: 1976: 2688:

that changed all instances of Mega-CD to Sega CD & Mega Drive to Genesis, wonder if it's linked? -

1817:

article, but the reference seems to indicate it's for DS (as does the Rune article). So I wasn't sure.

979:

would be accurate). the "compelling reason" is accuracy plain and simple. my first reaction to loading

285:

last weekend, and have yet to receive any response. Please take a look and give some feedback. Thanks.

141:, checking that they were useful, and cleaning up or removing if needed. (~95% of them were just fine) 4287:

Just a reminder, when editing new/forthcoming game articles this week please be sure to tag them with

4301: 3831: 3554: 2059: 1167: 1152: 1142: 1040:

the name of the article, likewise a UK company first releases the game in the US we use the US title)

4488: 4333:

Ditto that support. Seems odd (and a bit US biased even) that we have a template for E3 but not for

2525: 2470: 1296:

Not to mention you can get dozens of different years when counting European countries individually.

708:

It is still a factor, simply because it adds weight to the argument of "this is the original title".

221:

I thought we weren't supposed to link to disambiguation pages. Don't we just de-link in this case?

4231: 4219: 4116:

No, digital describes all video game media. What would an analog video game be? Or an analog video

3134: 3076: 3048: 2972: 2419: 1795: 1747: 1636: 1614: 1394: 4477: 1417:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Images_from_freeware_computer_software

991:, why the heck are they titling it after a colloquialism?" we should be using this opportunity to 455: 392: 4272: 4205: 4127: 4095: 4018: 3891: 3857: 3607: 3526: 3451: 3223: 2831: 2741: 2571: 2503: 2456: 596: 149: 4592:

and look for the Consoles and Classics section - one of those forums may be able to help you. —

4136:

Well music downloads are usually refered to it that way, which is why I thought of it. *shrug*.

1952:

Magazine covers are copyrighted, so they are not free pic. Having multiple covers would violate

1755:

This is the Video games project, we don't deal with pen-and-paper role-playing games. Go ask at

1733: 3582: 3562: 2985:

should have his own page, because there really isn't enough information about him to merit it.

2601: 180:

The TfD was closed as "no consensus". I've left a proposed solution at the end of this thread:

4499: 4325: 4050: 3993: 3774: 3735: 3289: 2849: 2755: 2731: 2483: 2391: 2368: 2330: 2292: 2279: 2120: 1994: 1856: 1814: 1452: 1407: 1284: 1208: 1115:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/archive26#Games_that_have_multiple_years_for_categories

1097: 1054: 1045: 459: 4433: 3639: 3066: 2783: 2773: 1783: 1426:

freeware. The article itself should probably be amended if a better reference can't be found.

1000: 357: 4594: 4579: 4387: 4347: 4334: 4254: 4160: 3919: 3194: 3015: 2954: 2923: 2803:(I'm unwatching this page. Please let me know if/when this issue gets reraised. Thanks :) -- 2625: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2041: 1557: 1547: 1416: 608: 462:

is listed (in ascending order) in the related categories: "Cat:Manchester United F.C." : -->

4032:

I've seen so far, but how should Download and the size be there in relation to one another?

3382: 2621: 428: 4419: 4373: 4298: 4184: 4053:" should certainly not be used because that isn't the media, it's where you buy the game. 3819: 3625: 3499: 3435: 3305: 3204: 3120: 2891: 2660:

who was particularly interested in release dates and who used a lot of socks and attacks.

2563: 2438: 2264: 2086: 2001: 1939: 1922: 1710: 1684: 1655: 1503: 1439: 910: 861: 794: 620: 222: 205:. So, I was wondering if you can change the links, mostly in Crash Bandicoot articles, to 118: 4386:

Lots of articles that have nothing to do with E3 also get quite a lot of not good edits.

3061:

If you want to start a new task force the best thing to do is to create your proposal at

2287:

I mentioned this to Jacoplane, but should we have one more collaboration? I was thinking

1953: 1207:

I agree with X201, it just doesnt make sense to have multiple release years. It's silly.

754:

long). eg. "Brain Training" is not long enough for its length to be an issue. However, a

1519:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany_for_deletion#Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Kirby.27s_Dream_Land

321:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Final Fantasy/archive/22#Final Fantasy (series) article

4223: 3902:

question. If you can show me where it says theres something wrong with that, please do.

3131: 3071: 3045: 2969: 2706: 1908: 1792: 1737: 1609: 1543: 1334: 1261: 980: 960: 342: 310: 255: 231: 210: 1556:

As a matter of fact, 4th and 5th and more opinions would be appreciated here as well.

4522: 4410: 4378: 4370: 4312: 4267: 4200: 4189: 4181: 4122: 4090: 4056: 4013: 3989: 3981: 3886: 3852: 3792: 3704: 3688: 3602: 3537: 3521: 3509: 3415: 3389: 3370: 3341: 3329: 3310: 3302: 3265:

today and noticed that a couple games have been added since it became featured. (see

3169: 3104: 3100: 2826: 2804: 2795: 2499: 2452: 2355: 2269: 2261: 2219: 2174: 2139: 2106: 2006: 1998: 1957: 1944: 1936: 1818: 1594: 1522: 1275: 1265: 1128: 1118: 1078: 943: 591: 503: 493: 467: 442: 432: 402: 296: 185: 172: 158: 3338:

I'm sure there's some kind of rule about not listing extensive credits isn't there?

4559: 4492: 4137: 4108: 3767: 3728: 3270: 3145: 3031: 2941: 2842: 2720: 2685: 2661: 2648: 2553: 2531: 2020: 1984: 1849: 1399: 1338: 1297: 1288: 1230: 324: 4355:

Given the downsizing of E3, I can understand your views. I think just having the

3489: 2019:, but arguments are basically the same. I'm considering listing the image at AfD. 4291: 4248: 4155: 4033: 4001: 3578: 3301:

That's a pretty bad template. We should only interwiki to pages which exist. -

3008: 2950: 2916: 2745: 2517: 2350: 2204: 1768: 1475: 1088: 1013:

Non english-speaking country of origin (First english-speaking country's title -

286: 246: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2444:

The title says it all.. --The source of the cosmos... 15:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

1665:

Semi-protection of Picross DS and Brain Age: Train Your Brain in Minutes a Day!

4427: 4366: 3924: 3633: 2986: 2899: 2792:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_June_9#Template:Moby_developer

2288: 2129: 2116: 1895:

Me and another editor a while back added list of cover images a while back to

1493: 1466:

It just depends on whether the images end up licensed under a license that is

362: 352: 169:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 9#Template:Moby developer

115: 2577:(GBA), along with Eagle and Yun's appearance from Alpha 3 Upper to the list. 2552:

With sources, do you think this list could become a Featured List candidate?

2080:

I've also tried to present a more organized 'reboot' of the discussion here:

4613: 4338: 4215: 4171: 3966: 3269:) Could someone re-check them and eventually adjust the number in the lead? 3157: 2769: 2689: 2578: 2341: 2319: 2055: 1877: 1539: 1531: 1373: 1361: 1316: 1239: 1189: 659:

at another title is a very weak reason, and guaranteed to lead to edit wars.

332:

I believe most just use (series). I haven't seen the other two used at all.

2203:'s review either. I'll review yours in the hope you're return the favor ;) 2068:

Proposed move: "Mario Strikers Charged" → "Mario Strikers Charged Football"

1932: 579:

we should use the English title, not just the original one -- this is why

3119:

Is this an indiscriminate list, or do you think it is very encyclopedic?

2982: 2883: 2867: 2730:. Any help would be appreciated as pqart of the Wikification project. -- 2085:

As much input as possible (for or against) would be greatly appreciated.

996: 968: 881:

If nothing else, don't you think that's a significantly different issue?

333: 305:"Example series" vs. "Example (series)" vs. "Example (video game series)" 4198:

Download it is then, and forget about the filesize, it's not necessary.

2909:

less like "in-universe" language and more like encyclopedic information.

2824:, as there seems to be an active discussion about game guides and such. 2528:, I don't believe that this project has leaders - most projects do not. 3996:(PlayStation Store, a section of the PlayStation Network article), and 956: 828:

What I think you fail to realize is that, not only for videogames, but

4088:

Maybe the size isn't really necessary, if it's going to be confusing.

2963:

Feel free to move all the excessive fictional database information to

2936:

sufficient content. Otherwise, we wind up with lots of articles like

769:, but I don't see the point. Personally, I'd prefer to see a somewhat 309:

Witch name should be used for an article about a video game series? --

3166:

I just added a few to it too, but would shed no tears were it to go.

2895: 112:

Knowledge (XXG):Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#MobyGames.2F_Flipkin

3847: 2788:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Spam/2007 Archive Jun#mobygames.com

2703: 295:

I still have the SNES. But it isn't plugged in... Anyways, Hello! --

4407:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_July_11#Template:E3

1873: 3658:

whole point of this page. In other words, please don't erase it.

2886:). Some are listed on "List of.." pages that are quite good (see 3997: 2119:. And I'm announcing that I just put a speedy deletiong tag on 2102:

Have a nice day! (I'm not logging out, it was just to be nice.)

1283:

It's not unique to video games at all. Taking a Japanese movie,

1268: 1121: 496: 435: 202: 3762:

It isn't except any way that you may have formed it to be. See

2822:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines

1546:

if anyone cares to have a look and comment. Thanks in advance.

1264:

which were released in different regions in different years. -

2727: 2656:

Also, does s/he appear... agressive or hotheaded? There was a

1827:

I see nothing to indicate that it's coming to Wii. Only DS. -

1704:

Well, the problem with protecting the picross article is that

1631:

Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Attribution-Ubisoft

25: 3561:. Thanks. I think it's worthy of a Knowledge (XXG) article. ∞ 2278:

and see if there is enough response to consider reviving it.

750:

Length itself shouldn't be a significant factor (unless it's

539:

Which version is released first should be taken into account.

4589: 778:

But you really have to realize that you need to address MoS.

3815: 1709:

you'll have a very strong case for favouring your version.

1429:

However, for the sake of covering possible future cases, I

1337:, released in 1992 and remade in 2005. That's complicated. 1325:

I think there might still be problems with remakes. Should

245:

or something similar, rather than the disambiguation page.

182:

Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#3 comments

3882:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines

1788:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Notability (fiction)#Rewrite proposed

1629:

Hi, just to let you know there's an ongoing discussion at

4578:

another shot. Anyone know what game I'm talking about? --

4346:

I'd support that deletion as well. Talk about pointless!

3976:

Standardization of media listing for downloadable titles?

2964: 1605:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games/Video Game Images

1073:

categories. Once such edit summary of this editor said:

454:

Well, it's pretty much as a result of the last CFD, but

341:

Okey, I'll go for the "Example (series)" format then. --

4608:

or try the entertainment section of the reference desk

4265:

Yeah. It's more like calling a DVD, "PlayStation DVD."

4222:

Download. We don't call CD, DVD, BD or HD-DVD "Disc". —

3581:

vultures swooped in for the attack, unfortunately. :/ ∞

3557:

has been nominated for deletion. Please comment on its

3485: 3481: 3477: 3266: 2981:

I agree with you on this, Slordak - I don't think that

2171:

No one's responded to this yet... Anyone out there? :)

1075:

Year cats aren't redundant as per CVG project agreement

791:

for the sake of the articles, rather than the principle

145:

I would appreciate assistance doing the same thing for

4369:

are getting quite a lot of edits, not all are good. -

1633:, about using Ubisoft screenshots & its license -- 1111:

Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Multiple_year_categories

3218:

opposed to relying on people knowing to manually add

3026:

Slordak, "Articles for Deletion" is for articles for

655:

reason to do so. The fact that you think it would be

3624:I voted keep. I don't see how it isn't important. 2779:

That's the very short version, from my perspective.

2728:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Auto_Assault#External_links

4324:I'd support that deletion. It seems pretty silly. 2744:, I reverted the changes so it should work now. -- 1917:I suggest that you also pose the question over at 1538:Hi, I'd like to petition for a 3rd opinion on the 1472:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags/Free licenses 254:Whatever works best for yall, go ahead and do it. 1899:. Yet another editor thinks that it has violated 3069:. If people object you'll find out soon enough. 3063:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games/Suikoden 2786:, with recent background discussion archived at 2772:; but not perfectly reliable, as established at 816:reason for the article to be at the NA title. - 651:Articles should only be renamed when there is a 765:I don't see the point of the last one. I don't 241:I usually redlink such cases to, in this case, 230:Yeah, until an article is made about this guy. 2082:Talk:Mario_Strikers_Charged#Reboot_on_the_Move 1502:I commented on one of the Agatha Criste FACs. 631:My first comment? That videogame articles are 4214:I don't think "Download" is ok. It should be 3236:I have proposed this template for deletion - 2038:List of Virtual Console games (North America) 2017:Talk:Xbox Live Arcade#Microsoft Points symbol 1993:As you've already noticed, I've commented at 975:isn't even an official translation (at least 847:As for Mario Strikers specifically, I really 386:"system-only games" subcats and their parents 8: 4610:Knowledge (XXG):Reference_desk/Entertainment 3039:Since the characters are the focal point of 2764:That is one perspective that was given... ;) 940:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (videogames) 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Video games 4445:Quintet Games Articles and associated links 1392:What I want to do is make screenshots from 1327:Final Fantasy Tactics: The War of the Lions 1141:equally well justify multiple year cats? -- 3279:Problem with {cvg year interwiki} template 1995:User_talk:JAF1970#Image:Microsoftpoint.gif 131:I have now been through every instance of 4337:or any of the other conferences/shows. - 3203:Prod. Will take it to AFD if Ihave to. 2054:Please to be noting that I've PRODed the 1901:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content criteria 3114:List of video games with classical music 1933:http://www.magweasel.com/Next_Generation 1654:Looks like it's bordering twoards keep. 3818:, which allows this sort of content -- 2715:Auto Assault needs MobyGames link fixed 456:WP:SUBCAT#Secondary categorization rule 4049:"Download" seems best. Anything like " 3367:Marvel:_Ultimate_Alliance#Voice_Actors 3326:Marvel:_Ultimate_Alliance#Voice_Actors 3250:. Thought people might be interested. 3246:My reasons are on the discussion page 1382:Freeware and the "one screenshot" rule 1347:nothing wrong with having two or more 995:, not promote the ignorant usage of a 983:was, "so if the picture is calling it 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3846:The usual Wiki we refer people to is 3696:By the way I meant extra pages like, 3095:article is a good testament to that. 2645:Knowledge (XXG):Request for checkuser 1977:Talk:Microsoft Points#Currency symbol 1919:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content 1573:Category:All disputed non-free images 1567:Image Fair Use rationales and covers. 7: 1846:Rune Factory: A Fantasy Harvest Moon 1811:Rune Factory: A Fantasy Harvest Moon 1269: 1122: 1068:Multiple year categories in articles 1033:- Most accurate literal translation) 667:, but it certainly seems acceptable. 497: 436: 3320:Voice actors lists in game articles 2875:Force. I want to do the following: 2568:Street Fighter Alpha 3 Double Upper 2431:How do you create a task force here 2201:Super Nintendo Entertainment System 2199:I haven't gotten any responses for 1415:This topic can also be found here: 637:. As such, it's best to follow the 463:"Cat:FA Premier League Clubs" : --> 279:Super Nintendo Entertainment System 4405:I've put it up for deletion here: 3814:You may be interested in visiting 3365:I would think so, but the list on 3103:, and they still need to be done. 2138:It's my console in development. -- 1761:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons 585:is listed at that name and not at 24: 3698:List of Resident Evil 4 creatures 3296:(sorry, my english isn't so good) 3232:Game controller template deletion 3002:, etc. Also, I would like to see 2546:List of Street Fighter characters 2074:The original discussion is here: 726:potential titles are recognizable 3099:at least think require doing at 3000:Minor characters in Suikoden III 2907:Geography in the Suikoden series 2248:Gaming Collaboration of the Week 2076:Talk:Mario_Strikers_Charged#Move 1513:Kirby project is up for deletion 207:Brendan O'Brien (disambiguation) 29: 3324:When are they needed? Example: 3089:actively improving the articles 2996:Minor characters in Suikoden II 1975:There is currently a debate at 1730:Expedition to the Demonweb Pits 1724:Expedition to the Demonweb Pits 587:Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo 4409:, feel free to comment there. 2698:Good Citations for VG articles 1757:WikiProject Role-playing games 634:still Knowledge (XXG) articles 582:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly 1: 2938:Jade (Beyond Good & Evil) 2491:A task force that makes mods. 2212:If I could help by reviewing 1907:. Thanks for your opinions. — 1728:Could someone take a look at 1468:acceptable to Knowledge (XXG) 942:and request for support). -- 110:Please see the discussion at 3700:, The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3222:when they add the template. 3004:Minor characters in Suikoden 2992:Minor characters in Suikoden 2888:Minor characters in Suikoden 2784:WP:COIN#MobyGames.2F Flipkin 2774:WP:COIN#Cutting to the chase 2575:Street Fighter Alpha 3 Upper 971:. According to the article, 860:than happy to be corrected) 762:significant in this context) 431:would be a better option. - 3764:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 3553:A relevant gaming article, 3369:always seems to come back. 2255:of the Week every week! :) 1053:01:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC) - 989:Space Knight Tekkaman Blade 977:Space Knight Tekkaman Blade 127:Checking assistance request 4635: 3101:Talk:Suikoden#WikiProject? 2726:The problem is located at 2151:this type of foolishness. 562:That's just for starters. 524:What needs to be done is: 517:Naming conventions reform. 103:MobyGames and COI spammers 4617:21:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 4604:18:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 4590:http://forums.gamespy.com 4583:13:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 4563:09:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 4542:17:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4511:15:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4481:13:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4437:22:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4414:22:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4391:13:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4382:13:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4351:08:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4342:08:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4329:06:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4316:06:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4305:06:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4277:20:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 4261:17:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 4241:16:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 4210:20:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4193:13:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4180:Download is just fine. - 4175:10:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4163:03:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4141:01:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4132:01:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4112:01:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4100:01:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4076:00:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4037:00:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 4023:22:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 4005:22:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3970:02:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 3958:16:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3946:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3928:19:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3907:23:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3904:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3896:22:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3875:20:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3872:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3862:22:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3842:20:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3810:20:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3807:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3796:20:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3786:19:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3758:19:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3755:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3747:18:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3719:18:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3716:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3708:17:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3692:17:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3679:16:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3667:The Infamous Dr. Salvador 3263:List of Nintendo 64 games 3261:I looked at the Featured 3255:List of Nintendo 64 games 2965:The Knowledge (XXG) Annex 2808:18:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 2759:23:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2749:08:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2735:07:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2710:17:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2693:08:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2684:An anon IP made edits to 2677:17:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2665:17:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2652:17:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2638:16:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2582:00:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2557:16:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2487:01:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2474:20:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2423:20:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 2384:01:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2372:00:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2359:13:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2345:08:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2334:00:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2323:08:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2313:00:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2301:00:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2283:00:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2273:22:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2239:15:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2208:23:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2194:21:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2156:00:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2143:21:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2133:21:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2110:21:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2090:18:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2063:03:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2045:03:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2024:04:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 2010:00:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1988:00:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1961:21:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1948:17:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1926:16:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1912:16:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1881:00:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1868:15:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1835:05:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1822:05:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1800:22:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 1772:17:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1750:19:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 1714:22:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1700:22:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1688:22:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1677:22:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1659:17:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1649:16:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1598:21:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1561:13:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1551:13:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1526:00:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1507:18:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1497:12:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1479:12:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1456:05:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1443:04:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1411:04:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1365:10:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1342:09:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1320:08:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1301:10:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1292:22:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1279:21:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1243:10:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1234:09:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1212:09:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1193:09:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1186:games published in year x 1156:21:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1146:21:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1132:21:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1106:20:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1092:20:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1082:18:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1063:01:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1017:- First official english 947:02:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 914:20:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 877:20:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 865:20:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 824:20:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 811:20:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 798:20:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 624:20:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 612:20:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 601:19:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 573:19:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 507:18:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 487:16:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 446:16:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 422:20:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 374:23:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 346:21:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 337:20:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 328:20:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 314:19:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 300:21:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 290:20:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 261:07:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 250:05:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 237:05:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 226:01:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 216:22:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 189:17:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 176:18:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 162:22:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 122:11:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 3986:Prince of Persia Classic 3643:03:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 3612:02:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 3592:02:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 3572:19:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 3541:04:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 3531:22:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 3513:22:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 3503:22:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 3439:18:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3419:18:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3409:07:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3374:07:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3361:07:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3333:06:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3314:23:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 3293:22:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3274:21:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3227:01:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3208:16:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3198:15:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3189:15:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3161:08:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3149:03:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3139:02:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3124:00:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3108:04:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 3053:20:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 3035:19:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 3022:20:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2977:19:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2959:19:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2945:18:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2930:18:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2861:06:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 2836:19:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2799:01:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2537:17:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 2521:17:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 2400:02:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2036:Please head over to the 1981:Image:Microsoftpoint.gif 1971:Image:Microsoftpoint.gif 1897:Next Generation Magazine 1584:Non-free media rationale 1470:; several are listed at 1377:08:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 854:in the country of origin 3129:Indiscriminate list. — 2990:creating articles like 2905:Make articles like the 2669:Slightly, I suppose. - 1625:Image template Deletion 1534:Request for 3rd opinion 1521:. Comment if you want. 1433:it would depend on the 1021:article is located at - 987:and the translation is 243:Brendan O'Brien (actor) 3653:Erasing Contributions. 3030:, not merge/redirect. 2782:The main thread is at 2165:Ultimate Play The Game 2095:Announce the Ultradog! 648:Generally speaking... 4299:Dread Lord CyberSkull 3093:Suikoden (video game) 2820:Everyone, please see 2594:Worms: Open Warfare 2 2260:general guideline. - 1805:Harvest Moon articles 1786:is being proposed at 1542:article. It's on the 1349:Year x in video games 1312:Year x in Video Games 1173:People born in year x 1031:takes precedence over 1023:takes precedence over 1015:takes precedence over 722:or to establish that 277:I've been working on 42:of past discussions. 4461:"trilogy" as such. 4138:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 4109:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 3992:(no media listing), 3285:{cvg year interwiki} 3146:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 2816:Scope of information 2115:Hello everyone, I'm 2032:Help Solving Dispute 1765:WikiProject Greyhawk 1406:Please let me know. 1289:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1168:Crime and Punishment 4220:PlayStation Network 3984:(Direct Download), 3549:Action (gaming) AfD 2967:upon completion. — 1025:- Official english 909:, if nothing else. 888:is the "real" name. 196: 4573:back in the day... 3452:Pauline (Nintendo) 2740:Someone broke the 2671:A Link to the Past 2632:A Link to the Past 2378:A Link to the Past 2307:A Link to the Past 2250:Needs More People! 1829:A Link to the Past 1694:A Link to the Past 1671:A Link to the Past 1619:• 2007-06-24 20:17 871:A Link to the Past 852:Strikers Charged" 818:A Link to the Past 805:A Link to the Past 783:poisoning the well 567:A Link to the Past 4418:I agree, delete. 4051:PlayStation Store 3994:Calling All Cars! 3961: 3944:comment added by 3913:Game name dispute 3840: 3839: 3826: 3682: 3665:comment added by 3297: 3082: 3081:• 2007-07-6 15:50 2957: 2643:You shoud make a 2512: 2498:comment added by 2465: 2451:comment added by 1815:List of Wii games 1620: 1285:Princess Mononoke 747:Teknoman article) 460:Manchester United 259: 235: 214: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4626: 4537: 4534: 4531: 4528: 4525: 4497: 4430: 4424: 4376: 4364: 4358: 4296: 4290: 4259: 4257: 4251: 4239: 4187: 4158: 4071: 4068: 4065: 4062: 4059: 3960: 3938: 3832:Talk to the Hand 3829: 3828: 3825: 3820: 3772: 3733: 3681: 3659: 3636: 3630: 3493: 3475: 3404: 3401: 3398: 3395: 3392: 3383:WP:NOT#DIRECTORY 3356: 3353: 3350: 3347: 3344: 3308: 3295: 3245: 3239: 3213:cvgproj template 3184: 3181: 3178: 3175: 3172: 3079: 3074: 3070: 3020: 3013: 2953: 2928: 2921: 2847: 2535: 2511: 2492: 2464: 2445: 2443: 2437: 2349:I nominated the 2267: 2234: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2222: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2180: 2177: 2153:guitarhero777777 2004: 1979:over the use of 1942: 1854: 1744: 1741: 1644: 1639: 1617: 1612: 1608: 1588: 1582: 1273: 1272: 1126: 1125: 1032: 1024: 1016: 501: 500: 482: 479: 476: 473: 470: 440: 439: 417: 414: 411: 408: 405: 365: 360: 355: 273:SNES peer review 258: 234: 213: 209:please. Thanks. 154: 148: 140: 134: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4634: 4633: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4575: 4535: 4532: 4529: 4526: 4523: 4503: 4493: 4447: 4432: 4428: 4420: 4374: 4362: 4356: 4294: 4288: 4285: 4255: 4249: 4247: 4229: 4185: 4156: 4069: 4066: 4063: 4060: 4057: 3978: 3939: 3935: 3915: 3880:Take a look at 3821: 3778: 3768: 3753:That page is.-- 3739: 3729: 3660: 3655: 3638: 3634: 3626: 3587: 3567: 3555:Action (gaming) 3551: 3466: 3450: 3447: 3445:Character merge 3402: 3399: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3354: 3351: 3348: 3345: 3342: 3322: 3306: 3281: 3259: 3243: 3237: 3234: 3215: 3182: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3170: 3117: 3077: 3072: 3009: 3007: 2917: 2915: 2872: 2853: 2843: 2818: 2717: 2700: 2590: 2550: 2529: 2493: 2446: 2441: 2435: 2433: 2265: 2252: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2178: 2175: 2169: 2097: 2070: 2052: 2034: 2002: 1973: 1940: 1893: 1891:Magazine Covers 1860: 1850: 1807: 1780: 1778:WP:FICT rewrite 1742: 1739: 1726: 1667: 1642: 1637: 1627: 1615: 1610: 1586: 1580: 1569: 1536: 1515: 1489: 1384: 1270: 1123: 1070: 1061: 1052: 1030: 1022: 1014: 653:very compelling 519: 498: 480: 477: 474: 471: 468: 437: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 388: 372: 363: 358: 353: 307: 275: 199: 197:Brendan O'Brien 152: 146: 138: 132: 129: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4632: 4630: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4574: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4514: 4513: 4501: 4446: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4426: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4319: 4318: 4284: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4263: 4196: 4195: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4026: 4025: 3977: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3934: 3931: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3878: 3877: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3776: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3737: 3722: 3721: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3694: 3654: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3632: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3595: 3594: 3585: 3565: 3550: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3516: 3515: 3495: 3494: 3446: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3321: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3280: 3277: 3258: 3257:needing review 3252: 3241:Gamepad styles 3233: 3230: 3214: 3211: 3201: 3200: 3191: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3116: 3111: 3084: 3083: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3037: 2979: 2961: 2911: 2910: 2903: 2880: 2871: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2851: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2780: 2777: 2765: 2752: 2751: 2716: 2713: 2699: 2696: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2654: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2549: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2477: 2476: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2326: 2325: 2251: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2168: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2136: 2135: 2125: 2124: 2096: 2093: 2084: 2079: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2051: 2050:Overworld PROD 2048: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1858: 1838: 1837: 1806: 1803: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1638:Andersmusician 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1535: 1529: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1446: 1445: 1427: 1423: 1383: 1380: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1353: 1352: 1335:Romancing SaGa 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1281: 1262:Shaolin Soccer 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1229:or something. 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1159: 1158: 1148: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1069: 1066: 1057: 1048: 1042: 1041: 1034: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 973:Tekkaman Blade 961:Tekkaman Blade 950: 949: 936: 932: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 894: 893: 892: 889: 857: 845: 813: 779: 776: 775: 774: 763: 748: 744: 740: 739: 738: 737: 730: 729: 713: 712: 711: 710: 702: 701: 697: 696: 695: 694: 685: 684: 668: 660: 646: 629: 615: 614: 604: 603: 560: 559: 554: 553:abbreviation). 550: 546: 543: 540: 537: 533: 530: 518: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 449: 448: 387: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 368: 306: 303: 294: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 256:User:Zscout370 232:User:Zscout370 211:User:Zscout370 198: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 136:Moby developer 128: 125: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4631: 4618: 4615: 4611: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4601: 4597: 4596: 4591: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4581: 4572: 4564: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4543: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4512: 4509: 4508: 4505: 4504: 4498: 4496: 4490: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4479: 4474: 4470: 4466: 4462: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4444: 4438: 4435: 4431: 4425: 4423: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4412: 4408: 4404: 4392: 4389: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4380: 4377: 4372: 4368: 4361: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4349: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4327: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4317: 4314: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4303: 4300: 4293: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4269: 4264: 4262: 4258: 4252: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4237: 4233: 4228: 4227: 4221: 4217: 4212: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4202: 4194: 4191: 4188: 4183: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4173: 4164: 4161: 4159: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4142: 4139: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4124: 4119: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4110: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4092: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4077: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4052: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4038: 4035: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4015: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3990:Geometry Wars 3987: 3983: 3982:Lumines Live! 3975: 3971: 3968: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3932: 3930: 3929: 3926: 3921: 3912: 3908: 3905: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3888: 3883: 3876: 3873: 3869: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3854: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3837: 3833: 3827: 3824: 3817: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3808: 3803: 3797: 3794: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3784: 3783: 3780: 3779: 3773: 3771: 3765: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3745: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3734: 3732: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3702: 3701: 3699: 3695: 3693: 3690: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3652: 3644: 3641: 3637: 3631: 3629: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3604: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3593: 3590: 3589: 3580: 3579:m:deletionist 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3570: 3569: 3560: 3556: 3548: 3542: 3539: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3518: 3517: 3514: 3511: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3501: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3474: 3470: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3437: 3433: 3428: 3420: 3417: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3384: 3380: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3331: 3327: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3304: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3291: 3287: 3286: 3278: 3276: 3275: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3256: 3253: 3251: 3249: 3242: 3231: 3229: 3228: 3225: 3224:JohnnyMrNinja 3221: 3212: 3210: 3209: 3206: 3199: 3196: 3192: 3190: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3159: 3150: 3147: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3122: 3115: 3112: 3110: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3096: 3094: 3090: 3080: 3075: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3054: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3042: 3038: 3036: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3019: 3016: 3014: 3012: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2971: 2966: 2962: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2924: 2922: 2920: 2908: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2855: 2854: 2848: 2846: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2828: 2823: 2815: 2809: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2743: 2742:template page 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2722: 2714: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2697: 2695: 2694: 2691: 2687: 2678: 2675: 2672: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2653: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2626: 2624: 2622: 2620: 2618: 2616: 2614: 2612: 2610: 2608: 2606: 2604: 2602: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2587: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2555: 2548:Featured List 2547: 2544: 2538: 2534: 2533: 2527: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2519: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2480: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2440: 2430: 2424: 2421: 2417: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2382: 2379: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2370: 2366: 2360: 2357: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2327: 2324: 2321: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2281: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2271: 2268: 2263: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2249: 2246: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2166: 2163: 2157: 2154: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2108: 2103: 2100: 2094: 2092: 2091: 2088: 2083: 2077: 2067: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2057: 2049: 2047: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2031: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1970: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1890: 1882: 1879: 1875: 1874:StrategyWiki: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1855: 1853: 1847: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1789: 1785: 1782:A rewrite of 1777: 1773: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1745: 1735: 1731: 1723: 1715: 1712: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1686: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1675: 1672: 1664: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1640: 1632: 1624: 1618: 1613: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1590: 1585: 1576: 1574: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1512: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1486: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1390: 1387: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1313: 1302: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1274: 1267: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1181: 1174: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1149: 1147: 1144: 1139: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1039: 1035: 1028: 1020: 1012: 1011: 1006:in summation: 1005: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 953: 952: 951: 948: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 915: 912: 908: 907:a unique case 904: 899: 895: 890: 887: 883: 882: 880: 879: 878: 875: 872: 868: 867: 866: 863: 858: 855: 850: 846: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 826: 825: 822: 819: 814: 812: 809: 806: 801: 800: 799: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 777: 772: 768: 764: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 742: 741: 734: 733: 732: 731: 727: 725: 720:differences, 719: 715: 714: 709: 706: 705: 704: 703: 699: 698: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 669: 666: 661: 658: 654: 650: 649: 647: 644: 640: 636: 635: 630: 627: 626: 625: 622: 617: 616: 613: 610: 606: 605: 602: 598: 594: 593: 588: 584: 583: 577: 576: 575: 574: 571: 568: 563: 555: 551: 547: 544: 541: 538: 536:into account. 534: 531: 527: 526: 525: 522: 516: 508: 505: 502: 495: 490: 489: 488: 485: 484: 483: 461: 457: 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 444: 441: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 423: 420: 419: 418: 398: 394: 385: 375: 371: 366: 361: 356: 349: 348: 347: 344: 340: 339: 338: 335: 331: 330: 329: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 312: 304: 302: 301: 298: 292: 291: 288: 284: 280: 272: 262: 257: 253: 252: 251: 248: 244: 240: 239: 238: 233: 229: 228: 227: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 212: 208: 204: 190: 187: 183: 179: 178: 177: 174: 170: 166: 165: 164: 163: 160: 156: 151: 142: 137: 126: 124: 123: 120: 117: 113: 108: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4593: 4576: 4555: 4521: 4520: 4507: 4500: 4494: 4475: 4471: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4451: 4448: 4421: 4326:DurinsBane87 4286: 4266: 4225: 4218:Download or 4213: 4199: 4197: 4169: 4121: 4117: 4089: 4055: 4054: 4012: 3988:(Download), 3979: 3940:— Preceding 3936: 3916: 3885: 3879: 3851: 3848:StrategyWiki 3822: 3782: 3775: 3769: 3743: 3736: 3730: 3661:— Preceding 3656: 3627: 3601: 3583: 3563: 3552: 3536:my opinion. 3520: 3496: 3431: 3388: 3387: 3379:WP:LISTCRUFT 3340: 3339: 3323: 3290:Martin Rizzo 3283: 3282: 3260: 3235: 3219: 3216: 3202: 3168: 3167: 3155: 3130: 3118: 3097: 3088: 3085: 3044: 3040: 3027: 3010: 2968: 2918: 2912: 2873: 2857: 2850: 2844: 2825: 2819: 2756:DurinsBane87 2753: 2732:Guroadrunner 2725: 2721:Auto Assault 2718: 2701: 2686:Sega Mega-CD 2683: 2629: 2591: 2574: 2567: 2551: 2530: 2494:— Preceding 2490: 2484:DurinsBane87 2481: 2478: 2447:— Preceding 2434: 2369:Xtreme racer 2331:Xtreme racer 2280:Xtreme racer 2253: 2218: 2217: 2173: 2172: 2170: 2137: 2104: 2101: 2098: 2071: 2053: 2035: 1974: 1894: 1864: 1857: 1851: 1848:by the way. 1808: 1791: 1781: 1738: 1727: 1705: 1668: 1635: 1634: 1628: 1591: 1577: 1570: 1537: 1516: 1490: 1453:Guroadrunner 1434: 1430: 1414: 1408:Guroadrunner 1405: 1400:Jaguar XJR-9 1393: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1371: 1357: 1348: 1330: 1311: 1309: 1209:DurinsBane87 1185: 1179: 1177: 1172: 1074: 1071: 1055:ΖαππερΝαππερ 1046:ΖαππερΝαππερ 1043: 1037: 1026: 1018: 992: 988: 984: 981:that article 976: 972: 964: 906: 902: 897: 885: 853: 848: 841: 837: 833: 829: 790: 786: 782: 770: 766: 759: 755: 751: 723: 721: 717: 707: 690: 680: 676: 672: 664: 656: 652: 633: 632: 590: 586: 580: 565:Comments? - 564: 561: 523: 520: 466: 465: 401: 400: 396: 389: 308: 293: 276: 200: 184:. Thanks. -- 144: 143: 130: 109: 106: 75: 43: 37: 4595:KieferSkunk 4580:MKnight9989 4388:DarkSaber2k 4360:future game 4348:DarkSaber2k 3267:a full diff 3195:DarkSaber2k 2354:expanded!-- 2351:Fatal Frame 2167:peer review 2042:Miles Blues 1736:#2 either. 1558:DarkSaber2k 1548:DarkSaber2k 1027:translation 834:substantial 609:Oscarthecat 529:use either. 283:peer review 36:This is an 4367:Killzone 2 3823:MisterHand 3500:hbdragon88 3436:MisterHand 3205:hbdragon88 3121:hbdragon88 2987:Tir McDohl 2900:Tir McDohl 2870:Task Force 2630:Thanks. - 2289:video game 2087:Bladestorm 2060:Geuiwogbil 1923:MisterHand 1711:Bladestorm 1685:Bladestorm 1656:hbdragon88 1603:See also: 1504:hbdragon88 1440:Bladestorm 1153:Ecksemmess 1143:Ecksemmess 1059:Alexandria 1050:Alexandria 911:Bladestorm 898:definitely 862:Bladestorm 844:be common. 830:in general 795:Bladestorm 771:consistent 621:MisterHand 223:hbdragon88 95:Archive 35 87:Archive 30 82:Archive 29 76:Archive 28 70:Archive 27 65:Archive 26 60:Archive 25 4216:Xbox Live 3933:GamerWiki 3920:talk page 3816:GamerWiki 2770:MobyGames 2719:The game 2707:RC Master 2526:GrooveDog 2471:GrooveDog 2056:Overworld 1909:Mitaphane 1544:talk page 1540:Manhunt 2 1532:Manhunt 2 1182:in year x 665:necessary 393:WP:SUBCAT 343:MrStalker 311:MrStalker 150:Moby game 4411:RobJ1981 4313:RobJ1981 4236:contribs 4118:anything 3967:Prod-You 3954:contribs 3942:unsigned 3836:Contribs 3793:RobJ1981 3705:RobJ1981 3689:RobJ1981 3675:contribs 3663:unsigned 3538:RobJ1981 3510:RobJ1981 3432:Oblivion 3416:RobJ1981 3386:actors? 3371:RobJ1981 3330:RobJ1981 3220:class=NA 3105:SnowFire 3041:Suikoden 3028:deletion 2983:Miklotov 2884:Miklotov 2868:Suikoden 2805:Quiddity 2796:Quiddity 2588:A vandal 2508:contribs 2500:A legend 2496:unsigned 2461:contribs 2453:A legend 2449:unsigned 2420:Scytheml 2356:AutoGyro 2140:A legend 2121:Ultradog 2107:A legend 1958:TJ Spyke 1878:Prod-You 1819:RobJ1981 1734:WP:IINFO 1595:SnowFire 1523:RobJ1981 1435:specific 1331:original 1184:and not 1079:RobJ1981 997:misnomer 985:Teknoman 969:Teknoman 944:ReyBrujo 905:make it 838:insanely 752:insanely 557:NA : --> 427:I think 370:Contribs 297:A legend 186:Quiddity 173:Quiddity 159:Quiddity 4560:Kariteh 4556:opinion 4495:Ashnard 4489:Be bold 4478:BLang30 4335:Leipzig 4157:-Camann 3770:Ashnard 3731:Ashnard 3498:lists? 3469:protect 3464:history 3271:Circeus 3132:Deckill 3067:WP:BOLD 3046:Deckill 3032:Kariteh 2994:- i.e. 2970:Deckill 2942:Slordak 2845:Ashnard 2662:Kariteh 2649:Kariteh 2570:(PSP), 2554:Kariteh 2532:Greeves 2021:Dancter 1985:Dancter 1852:Ashnard 1793:Deckill 1784:WP:FICT 1706:neither 1431:believe 1398:of the 1339:Kariteh 1298:Kariteh 1231:Kariteh 1180:created 993:educate 963:really 957:Pokemon 886:neither 756:logical 718:massive 692:region. 397:as well 325:Kariteh 39:archive 4371:hahnch 4250:Camann 4226:Justin 4182:hahnch 4034:Camann 4002:Camann 3473:delete 3434:). -- 3303:hahnch 3011:bwowen 2951:tjstrf 2919:bwowen 2896:Viktor 2746:Mika1h 2674:(talk) 2635:(talk) 2564:Ingrid 2518:Anomie 2439:helpme 2381:(talk) 2310:(talk) 2262:hahnch 2205:Anomie 1999:hahnch 1937:hahnch 1832:(talk) 1769:Mika1h 1697:(talk) 1674:(talk) 1476:Anomie 1395:Stunts 1358:Game X 1266:hahnch 1178:Games 1119:hahnch 1089:Mika1h 1038:that's 967:be at 965:should 874:(talk) 821:(talk) 808:(talk) 767:object 736:usage. 677:better 673:better 657:better 639:Manual 570:(talk) 494:hahnch 433:hahnch 429:WP:CFD 287:Anomie 247:Nifboy 107:Guys, 4422:Giggy 4268:Andre 4201:Andre 4123:Andre 4120:? ;P 4091:Andre 4014:Andre 3925:AlexJ 3887:Andre 3853:Andre 3628:Giggy 3603:Andre 3522:Andre 3490:views 3482:watch 3478:links 3078:PLANE 2827:Andre 2566:from 2392:Clyde 2293:Clyde 2130:PresN 2117:PresN 1954:WP:FU 1876:? -- 1616:PLANE 1494:PresN 1098:Clyde 1019:title 849:can't 643:Style 592:Andre 549:used. 116:BozMo 16:< 4614:X201 4602:) — 4600:talk 4502:Talk 4339:X201 4273:talk 4256:TALK 4232:talk 4206:talk 4172:X201 4128:talk 4096:talk 4019:talk 3998:flOw 3950:talk 3892:talk 3858:talk 3777:Talk 3738:Talk 3671:talk 3608:talk 3527:talk 3486:logs 3460:talk 3456:edit 3381:and 3248:here 3158:X201 3073:JACO 2955:talk 2940:. -- 2892:Flik 2852:Talk 2832:talk 2794:. -- 2790:and 2690:X201 2658:user 2579:Nall 2572:Maki 2504:talk 2457:talk 2396:talk 2342:X201 2320:X201 2297:talk 2214:SNES 1905:here 1859:Talk 1790:. — 1767:. -- 1743:Blue 1740:Cool 1611:JACO 1487:FACs 1386:Hi, 1374:X201 1362:X201 1317:X201 1240:X201 1190:X201 1117:. - 1113:and 1102:talk 1001:KISS 903:must 724:both 628:(ec) 597:talk 558:EU). 203:OTRS 171:) -- 119:talk 4224:cms 3559:AfD 2291:.-- 1763:or 1589:). 842:not 787:all 760:too 681:lot 641:of 364:ggy 334:TTN 4612:- 4530:ma 4527:re 4524:Mi 4491:. 4363:}} 4357:{{ 4302:✎☠ 4297:! 4295:}} 4292:e3 4289:{{ 4283:e³ 4275:) 4208:) 4130:) 4098:) 4064:ma 4061:re 4058:Mi 4021:) 3956:) 3952:• 3894:) 3860:) 3850:. 3766:. 3677:) 3673:• 3610:) 3584:Σɛ 3564:Σɛ 3529:) 3488:| 3484:| 3480:| 3476:| 3471:| 3467:| 3462:| 3458:| 3397:ma 3394:re 3391:Mi 3349:ma 3346:re 3343:Mi 3244:}} 3238:{{ 3177:ma 3174:re 3171:Mi 3135:er 3049:er 2998:, 2973:er 2898:, 2894:, 2834:) 2647:. 2510:) 2506:• 2463:) 2459:• 2442:}} 2436:{{ 2398:) 2299:) 2227:ma 2224:re 2221:Mi 2182:ma 2179:re 2176:Mi 2128:-- 2105:-- 2078:. 1935:- 1796:er 1759:, 1643:$ 1607:. 1587:}} 1581:{{ 1492:-- 1104:) 1003:). 856:?) 793:? 599:) 475:ma 472:re 469:Mi 410:ma 407:re 404:Mi 323:. 157:-- 153:}} 147:{{ 139:}} 133:{{ 91:→ 4598:( 4536:e 4533:r 4434:P 4429:U 4379:n 4375:e 4271:( 4253:• 4238:) 4234:| 4230:( 4204:( 4190:n 4186:e 4126:( 4094:( 4070:e 4067:r 4017:( 3948:( 3890:( 3856:( 3838:) 3834:| 3830:( 3669:( 3640:P 3635:U 3606:( 3588:² 3586:Þ 3568:² 3566:Þ 3525:( 3492:) 3454:( 3403:e 3400:r 3355:e 3352:r 3311:n 3307:e 3183:e 3180:r 3017:. 2925:. 2830:( 2502:( 2455:( 2394:( 2295:( 2270:n 2266:e 2233:e 2230:r 2188:e 2185:r 2007:n 2003:e 1945:n 1941:e 1276:n 1271:e 1129:n 1124:e 1100:( 1044:- 1029:- 728:. 595:( 504:n 499:e 481:e 478:r 443:n 438:e 416:e 413:r 367:/ 359:1 354:G 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 28 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index