99:
158:
130:
222:
144:
398:. We don't decide as Knowledge editors what number of followers is impressive. We don't use the numbers reported by the social media sites. If a secondary source takes note of the numbers and reports on them (in a credible way), that's the situation where the numbers might be considered noteworthy enough to be used in an article.
39:
24:
294:
One must read these articles to improve their vocabulary and develop some knowledge which is out of the social world. I put forward my prospective to support
Knowledge as much as possible
235:
464:
202:
474:
74:
412:
212:
165:
80:
422:
338:
469:
447:
406:
388:
380:
303:
281:
174:
439:
20:
143:
69:
135:
110:
395:
60:
299:
178:
295:
350:
231:
443:
384:
277:
116:
376:
370:
269:
50:
65:
46:
273:
170:
173:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
263:
458:
328:
322:
416:
313:
This essay is fine and I agree with what it says, but at the moment I look for the
259:
357:
One of those
Twitter aggregators blurred most info on their site, but an ordinary
400:
344:
221:
157:
129:
364:(Ctrl-U) sufficed to get an estimated value of about USD 15,000 per post;
428:
332:
318:
379:
section to possible answers or guidelines, not the answer itself. –
321:
followers are impressive enough to be mentioned in an existing
169:, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of
92:
15:
347:
BLP does not mention more than 1.2M Twitter followers in an
309:
What is a relevant number of social media followers in BLPs?
220:
431:I'm interested in got an infobox as musician on
25:Knowledge doesn't care how many friends you have
465:Low-impact WikiProject Knowledge essays pages
8:
238:on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.
267:
124:
369:. Are those followers relevant for, say,
109:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
126:
7:
375:N.B.: What's missing here is only a
290:Knowledge is the best e-encyclopedia
98:
96:
373:, or too horrible to talk about it?
115:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
475:WikiProject Knowledge essays pages
193:WikiProject Knowledge essays pages
177:. For a listing of essays see the
14:
163:This page is within the scope of
156:
142:
128:
97:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
1:
448:00:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
407:08:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
335:followers right in the silly
37:Put new text under old text.
411:Okay, also discussed in the
389:08:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
331:BLP mentions more than 1.4M
207:This page has been rated as
187:Knowledge:WikiProject Essays
166:WikiProject Knowledge essays
423:Infobox YouTube personality
339:infobox YouTube personality
258:is only relevant if you're
190:Template:WikiProject Essays
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
491:
367:allegedly</colbert: -->
470:NA-Class Knowledge essays
355:or elsewhere on the page.
304:11:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
228:
206:
151:
123:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
427:, and the one notable
377:WP:NUMFRIENDS#See also
232:automatically assessed
225:
213:project's impact scale
70:avoid personal attacks
296:Swapnil Kr. Chaudhuri
230:The above rating was
224:
371:Influencer marketing
327:For comparison, the
284:) 2012-10-15 (UTC)
226:
111:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
419:rules outside of
396:original research
285:
272:comment added by
254:Stuff you made up
251:
250:
247:
246:
243:
242:
239:
91:
90:
61:Assume good faith
38:
482:
426:
403:
366:<colbert: -->
354:
342:
229:
195:
194:
191:
188:
185:
171:Knowledge essays
160:
153:
152:
147:
146:
145:
140:
132:
125:
102:
101:
100:
93:
16:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
455:
454:
437:
434:
420:
401:
368:
363:
348:
336:
317:info: How many
311:
292:
256:
192:
189:
186:
183:
182:
179:essay directory
141:
138:
87:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
478:
477:
472:
467:
457:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
435:
432:
374:
365:
358:
356:
351:infobox person
326:
310:
307:
291:
288:
264:Rupert Murdoch
255:
252:
249:
248:
245:
244:
241:
240:
227:
217:
216:
205:
199:
198:
196:
161:
149:
148:
133:
121:
120:
114:
103:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
462:
460:
449:
445:
441:
430:
424:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
405:
404:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
372:
362:
352:
346:
340:
334:
330:
329:Emma Blackery
324:
320:
316:
308:
306:
305:
301:
297:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
265:
261:
253:
237:
233:
223:
219:
218:
214:
210:
204:
201:
200:
197:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
162:
159:
155:
154:
150:
137:
134:
131:
127:
122:
118:
112:
108:
104:
95:
94:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
399:
360:
359:view-source:
343:, while the
314:
312:
293:
268:— Preceding
260:Barack Obama
257:
208:
164:
117:WikiProjects
107:project page
106:
19:This is the
413:WP:TEAHOUSE
381:84.46.53.62
274:Groupuscule
459:Categories
440:84.46.53.3
345:Sasha Grey
209:Low-impact
175:discussion
139:Low‑impact
438:say so. –
415:, normal
394:Don't do
266:, etc...
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
429:YouTuber
402:— jmcgnh
315:opposite
282:contribs
270:unsigned
51:get help
333:YouTube
319:Twitter
211:on the
234:using
184:Essays
136:Essays
113:scale.
417:WP:42
105:This
79:Seek
27:page.
444:talk
385:talk
300:talk
278:talk
236:data
68:and
433:her
361:URL
323:BLP
203:Low
461::
446:)
436:my
425:}}
421:{{
387:)
353:}}
349:{{
341:}}
337:{{
302:)
286:
280:•
262:,
49:;
442:(
383:(
325:?
298:(
276:(
215:.
181:.
119::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
