112:
80:
150:
91:
265:
49:
184:
98:
226:
90:
97:
783:
For that reason alone, the example would deserve rewording, but it has an even bigger problem: science itself is philosophically doctrinal. Its principle dogma is that by the skeptically rigorous analysis of empirical evidence collected under controlled conditions, truth―or at least an increasingly
585:
The RFC involved multiple pages being merged into one new one. That requires a centralized discussion on one page. The most straightforward decision was made to have that discussion on the Talk page of the proposed page. The discussion preceding the RFC was extensive. The discussion of the broader
605:
It does not need a central discussion. Each merge can be looked at on its merits. Further the RfC has not been open for anything like a month, so it is not at all clear there is a consensus for the merge. Also when I tried to put in the wording that is currently on this page in replace of a new
586:
effort to consolidate and make sense of the Manual of Style was also extensive and widely participated in. The RFC was widely advertised, including on this Talk page. The result was clear. Disagree with it you may, but you are way out of line to try to reverse it by reverting. Please go to
784:
accurate approximation thereof―may be induced. That is an epistemology. The theory of evolution is a truth induced through the application of the scientific method, and when scientists regard evolution as fact, they do so because they believe in the epistemological doctrine of science.
540:
You bold edit nothing wrong with that I reverted it, you should discuss changes to guideline on the talk page of the guideline, if the change is disputed and not make the change again before there is consensus for the change on the talk page of the guideline. --
779:
does often have connotations of faith-based religious or philosophical belief, but its basic sense just means "a body of teachings". The theory of evolution, and, indeed, any scientific theory, falls within this broader definition of the term.
628:
A merge doesn't mean material will be transferred word for word. The main aim was to make the writing tighter, so obviously not everything can be moved over; there would have been little point in the merge otherwise.
410:
The feedback that I got was that, particularly for WP:BLPs, that attribution should be within the text of the article. If that is the case, would it be possible to reword the guideline to be more specific?
775:
imprecisely. The theory of evolution is rigorously proven beyond all reasonable scientific doubt, but in the sense that it forms part of the body of scientific teaching, it is scientific doctrine.
567:. This is a section that has been debated long and hard for a long time. Yet instead of copying the wording over to here, and agreeing a merge it has been changed, without any consultation on the
395:
if the phrasing "The use of one of these words in an article should be qualified by attributing it to the party that uses it." meant textual attribution within the article (example
203:
795:
Creationists like to describe evolution in ways that make it out to be just as much a matter of faith as any religion. That is the sense of "doctrine" meant here. --
642:
I would agree with you for article space. But when merging two guidelines why should it not be done that way as it will certainly cut down on misunderstandings --
392:
308:
303:
298:
293:
288:
283:
85:
412:
111:
79:
250:
197:
192:
804:
706:
702:
663:
587:
483:
454:
432:
771:
suffix, but it's semantically problematic to characterize this as "treating fact as doctrine" because that uses the word
174:
159:
60:
341:
791:
makes in the first place. What would the suggestion that the theory of evolution is a matter of doctrine even mean?
163:
124:
119:
320:
556:
487:
450:
416:
238:
167:
705:
about the future of this and others MoS naming style. Please consider the issues raised in the discussion and
48:
207:
of
Knowledge's policy and guideline documents is available, offering valuable insights and recommendations.
364:
486:
has been accepted. Within a few hours, this page will be redirected to the new Manual of Style guideline
360:
127:(MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.
66:
714:
564:
253:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
800:
555:
In this case I am totally opposed to the changes that have taken place in the wording that is on
372:
326:
17:
123:, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the
162:
procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the
English Knowledge
595:
495:
472:
322:
264:
149:
681:
For the merge yes but changes to the wording of this article should be discussed here. --
668:
630:
571:
talk page. I am willing to bet that many other sections have suffered in the same way. --
462:
437:
710:
537:" and even if there was the RFC should be run for a month before a decision is made.
796:
686:
647:
615:
576:
568:
560:
546:
524:
510:
385:
368:
808:
718:
690:
675:
651:
637:
619:
599:
580:
550:
528:
514:
499:
476:
444:
420:
376:
324:
591:
491:
468:
204:
guidance on how to contribute to the development and revision of
Knowledge policies
403:) or merely applying a footnote to a reliable source that uses the term (example:
505:
No it is not accepted changes to this page should be discussed on this page. --
359:
I am just wondering why the word terrorist is OK for Al-Qaeda, but not for IRA
183:
682:
643:
611:
572:
542:
520:
506:
535:
here is a clear consensus about this page--discuss, but do not edit war)
533:
I moved this section to the bottom From the history of the guideline: "
191:
For information on
Knowledge's approach to the establishment of new
590:
and do something productive: suggest how the page can be improved.
519:
And BTW changes are sought through consensus not through votes. --
610:. So please explain how it is a merge if the text is changing? --
787:
The more I think about it, the less sense this usage of the word
367:. I find the enforcement of this policy very biased on Knowledge
327:
258:
220:
42:
393:
Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#.22Attribution.22
754:
factual statements are actually a matter of doctrine (as in
182:
148:
607:
534:
246:
242:
233:
32:
25:
767:is an excellent example of the loaded use of the
738:
397:"..use of public funds was called scandalous
335:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
177:carefully and exercise caution when editing.
117:This redirect falls within the scope of the
224:
74:
59:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
724:But the theory of evolution IS doctrine!
231:Text and/or other creative content from
76:
405:"..use of public funds was scandalous"
386:Knowledge:WTA#Controversy_and_scandal
173:Contributors are urged to review the
133:Knowledge:WikiProject Manual of Style
46:
7:
170:. Both areas are subjects of debate.
136:Template:WikiProject Manual of Style
661:Please continue this discussion at
430:Please continue this discussion at
65:It is of interest to the following
14:
559:compared to what is currently on
455:Knowledge talk:Words to watch#RFC
339:may be automatically archived by
263:
110:
96:
89:
78:
47:
701:There is currently an ongoing
563:, particularly the section on
158:This redirect falls under the
1:
664:Knowledge talk:Words to watch
588:Knowledge Talk:Words to watch
433:Knowledge talk:Words to watch
461:can determine the future of
825:
809:14:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
752:to a word may suggest ...
719:21:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
691:23:39, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
676:08:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
652:23:39, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
638:08:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
620:06:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
600:04:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
581:04:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
551:04:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
529:04:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
515:03:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
500:17:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
477:08:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
445:08:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
421:02:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
15:
284:April 2002 – October 2005
237:was copied or moved into
190:
156:
120:Knowledge:Manual of Style
105:
73:
557:Knowledge:Words to watch
488:Knowledge:Words to watch
377:08:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
299:January 2008 – June 2008
294:May 2006 – December 2007
289:November 2005 – May 2006
239:Knowledge:Words to watch
234:Knowledge:Words to avoid
139:Manual of Style articles
193:policies and guidelines
761:
667:so it's in one place.
436:so it's in one place.
342:Lowercase sigmabot III
187:
153:
740:For instance, adding
361:Irish Republican Army
186:
168:article titles policy
152:
304:July 2008 – May 2009
245:. The former page's
453:, then weigh in at
251:provide attribution
188:
175:awareness criteria
160:contentious topics
154:
61:content assessment
674:
636:
451:WP:Words to watch
443:
349:
348:
257:
256:
219:
218:
215:
214:
211:
210:
816:
751:
745:
697:MoS naming style
673:
671:
635:
633:
442:
440:
344:
328:
267:
259:
236:
228:
227:
221:
201:. Additionally,
141:
140:
137:
134:
131:
114:
107:
106:
101:
100:
99:
94:
93:
92:
82:
75:
52:
51:
43:
35:
28:
824:
823:
819:
818:
817:
815:
814:
813:
747:
741:
726:
699:
669:
631:
608:you reverted it
438:
428:
426:Rock the !Vote!
389:
357:
340:
329:
323:
272:
232:
225:
164:Manual of Style
138:
135:
132:
130:Manual of Style
129:
128:
125:Manual of Style
95:
88:
86:Manual of Style
39:
38:
31:
24:
20:
12:
11:
5:
822:
820:
812:
811:
725:
722:
698:
695:
694:
693:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
623:
622:
503:
502:
427:
424:
413:207.69.139.147
388:
383:
381:
356:
353:
351:
347:
346:
334:
331:
330:
325:
321:
319:
316:
315:
314:
313:
311:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
278:
277:
274:
273:
268:
262:
255:
254:
249:now serves to
229:
217:
216:
213:
212:
209:
208:
189:
179:
178:
172:
155:
145:
144:
142:
115:
103:
102:
83:
71:
70:
64:
53:
37:
36:
29:
21:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
821:
810:
806:
805:contributions
802:
798:
797:User:Khajidha
794:
793:
792:
790:
785:
781:
778:
774:
770:
766:
760:
759:
757:
750:
744:
737:
735:
731:
723:
721:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
679:
678:
677:
672:
666:
665:
653:
649:
645:
641:
640:
639:
634:
627:
626:
625:
624:
621:
617:
613:
609:
604:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
589:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
553:
552:
548:
544:
538:
536:
531:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
512:
508:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
441:
435:
434:
425:
423:
422:
418:
414:
408:
406:
402:
400:
394:
387:
384:
382:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
354:
352:
343:
338:
333:
332:
318:
317:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
275:
271:
266:
261:
260:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
230:
223:
222:
206:
205:
200:
199:
194:
185:
181:
180:
176:
171:
169:
165:
161:
151:
147:
146:
143:
126:
122:
121:
116:
113:
109:
108:
104:
87:
84:
81:
77:
72:
68:
62:
58:
54:
50:
45:
44:
41:
34:
30:
27:
23:
22:
19:
788:
786:
782:
776:
772:
768:
765:evolutionism
764:
762:
756:evolutionism
755:
753:
748:
742:
739:
733:
729:
728:The part on
727:
709:if you wish
700:
662:
660:
584:
565:WP:TERRORIST
554:
539:
532:
518:
504:
463:
458:
449:Please read
448:
431:
429:
409:
404:
399:by Senator X
398:
396:
390:
380:
358:
350:
336:
269:
202:
196:
157:
118:
67:WikiProjects
56:
40:
198:WP:PROPOSAL
195:, refer to
736:has this:
703:discussion
670:SlimVirgin
632:SlimVirgin
606:synthesis
439:SlimVirgin
309:May 2009 –
166:, and the
763:The term
711:GnevinAWB
464:this page
355:Terrorism
243:this edit
18:Shortcuts
789:doctrine
777:Doctrine
773:doctrine
484:proposal
391:I asked
369:Karljoos
270:Archives
57:redirect
26:WT:WORDS
592:DocKino
492:DCGeist
469:DCGeist
337:28 days
247:history
569:WP:WTA
561:WP:WTA
63:scale.
33:WT:WTA
241:with
55:This
801:talk
769:-ism
749:-ist
743:-ism
734:-ism
732:and
730:-ist
715:talk
707:vote
687:talk
648:talk
616:talk
596:talk
577:talk
547:talk
525:talk
511:talk
496:talk
482:The
473:talk
417:talk
407:).
373:talk
803:) (
746:or
683:PBS
644:PBS
612:PBS
573:PBS
543:PBS
521:PBS
507:PBS
459:You
365:ETA
363:or
807:)
758:).
717:)
689:)
650:)
618:)
598:)
579:)
549:)
527:)
513:)
498:)
490:.—
475:)
467:.—
457:.
419:)
411:MM
401:"
375:)
799:(
713:(
685:(
646:(
614:(
594:(
575:(
545:(
523:(
509:(
494:(
471:(
415:(
371:(
345:.
69::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
