Knowledge (XXG)

Wolf v. Vidal

Source đź“ť

227:
Court's injunction on DAPA and the DACA expansion, Vidal was told by the government that his approval had to be reduced to a two-year work permit, despite the injunction only affirmed to cover the Fifth Circuit states (Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi). The injunction also affected the ability for his parents to receive deferred action for work permits under DAPA. Vidal gained the help from Make the Road New York, the
163:. On February 13, 2018, Judge Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York addressed the question of whether the government offered a legally adequate reason for ending the DACA program. The court found that Defendants did not provide a legally adequate reason for ending the DACA program and that the decision to end DACA was arbitrary and capricious. Defendants have appealed the decision to the 438:, 284 F. Supp. 3d 758 (D. Md. 2018): The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland decided not to enjoin the termination of DACA. However, the court entered an injunction prohibiting the federal government from sharing DACA applications information with immigrant enforcement. The decision has been appealed and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to issue a decision soon. 29: 275:, who after the case was amended to include the new claims related to the Trump's administration's decision to rescind DACA, became a noted figure in the DACA debate as he had been found to be harshly critical of the responses the government had made in why they opted to terminate the DACA during questioning. 352:
The Supreme Court issued its decision on June 18, 2020. In the 5-4 majority, the court found that the government's reasons to rescind the DACA program to arbitrary and capricious against the APA, and reversed the order, leaving the DACA program active. The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice
226:
MartĂ­n Batalla Vidal was the son of undocumented immigrants who had lived in New York City who only learned of his "dreamer" status in 2008. After the original DACA program was offered, Vidal applied in 2014 and had been approved in early 2015 for a three-year work permit. With the Texas District
453:, 298 F. Supp. 3d 209 (D.D.C. 2018), adhered to on denial of reconsideration, 315 F. Supp. 3d 457 (D.D.C. 2018): On August 17, 2018, the court partially stayed its order in ordering USCIS to accept to initial applications and advance parole. Now, USCIS only needs to accept renewal applications. 250:
While Vidal's case was being prosecuted, the Trump administration announced its plan to rescind the DACA entirely in September 2017. Vidal amended his case to assert that this action violated federal law. The amended complaint stated that the government failed to provide an explanation for the
278:
On February 13, 2018, Garaufis granted Vidal's motion for a preliminary injunction, preventing the government from rescinding the DACA. Garaufis did assert that the government had the authority to end the DACA program. However, he stated that the reasoning provided failed the
421: 413:, 279 F. Supp. 3d 1011 (N.D. Cal. 2018), aff'd sub nom. Regents of the Univ. of California v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2018): On November 8, 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Northern District Court's 40:
MartĂ­n Jonathan Batalla Vidal et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. State of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald Trump, President of the United States, et al., Defendants.
2145: 291:. Further, Garaufis asserted that there was an internal inconsistency with the Customs office's handling of the DACA, as it was continuing to adjudicate DACA renewal applications at the same time it claimed it was winding down the program. 2115: 188:
program. DACA provides young immigrants who meet specific criteria with protection from deportation and eligibility for work authorization for two years. Since 2012, about 800,000 people have been granted DACA. On September 5, 2017,
2130: 1919: 347: 301: 95: 357:, stated that they made no evaluation on the legality of the DACA program itself and that the government was free to submit a new regulation to rescind the DACA with better reasoning to fit the APA. Among dissents, Judge 1615: 511:
to explain that because the decision to grant deferred action and work authorization is discretionary, plaintiffs are not entitled to any additional interests that are contingent on that discretionary decision.
381:, 291 F. Supp. 3d 260 (E.D.N.Y. 2018): On February 13, 2018, the District Court granted a motion for a preliminary injunction ordering USCIS to accept DACA applications from people who have had DACA previously. 219:'s 2015 injunction preventing the government from enforcing the DAPA and extension of the DACA program. The federal government had challenged this to the Supreme Court, but due to the recent death of Justice 244: 331:. However, by November 2018, the government opted to bypass the Circuit Courts and petitioned the Supreme Court on all three cases. The Supreme Court accepted the petition on June 28, 2019, consolidating 538:, the organizational plaintiffs do not have a cause of action under the APA or under the Constitution because organizational plaintiffs' interests are "so marginally related" to the purposes of the INA. 216: 2474: 1855: 1610: 507:, the Eastern District of New York found that plaintiffs do "not possess a liberty or property interest in a particular decision under DACA nor an employment authorization card." The court cited 484:
where the district court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's substantive APA claim that alleged that Defendants arbitrary and capriciously changed DHSs's information-use policy. In
523:
to support their finding that plaintiffs have plausible alleged that a discriminatory purpose was a motivating factor behind the decision to terminate TPS for Haiti. The court cited language in
488:, the court found that Plaintiffs' had relied on a document that contradicted "their otherwise-unsupported allegation of a change to DHS's information-use policy." The Ninth Circuit found that 2405: 1986: 1320: 2033: 926: 313: 1681: 500:, the most recent FAQs were not attached to or referenced in any of the complaints. . . "therefore. . . materials outside the complaint cannot be considered on a motion to dismiss." 1625: 1417: 1620: 328: 164: 141: 2350: 1081: 212: 527:, where Judge Garaufis noted that "liability for discrimination will lie when a biased individual manipulates a non-biased decision-maker into taking discriminatory action." 193:
ordered an end to the DACA program and established a phasing out plan for DACA. The termination of the DACA program resulted in various lawsuits challenging the termination.
1825: 240: 575:
Ramos, Julio C.; Lieberman-Cribbin, Wil; Gillezeau, Christina; Alpert, Naomi; van Gerwen, Maaike; Tuminello, Stephanie; Flores, Raja; Taioli, Emanuela (6 February 2019).
255:, and that the Trump Administration's reversal is "unconstitutionally motivated by anti-Mexican and anti-Latino animus, in violation of equal protection component of the 2058: 1768: 260: 160: 1203: 2094: 1641: 899: 534:"does not stand for the sweeping proposition that any organization with immigrant clients has standing to sue for violations of the INA." The court found that in 2355: 1971: 1583: 1578: 1313: 1800: 1780: 1564: 236: 181: 875: 2135: 2125: 753: 280: 252: 156: 2330: 1991: 2365: 2120: 2023: 1763: 1595: 1306: 2345: 2063: 1805: 1357: 202: 1835: 1573: 1569: 2038: 468:, (S.D.Tex. 2018): The court denied plaintiff states' motion for a preliminary injunction because of the harm it would cause to DACA recipients. 854: 2006: 1830: 1666: 152: 2213: 709: 557: 299:
Garaufis' injunction came about a month following a similar injunction preventing the government from rescinding the DACA from California in
2043: 2208: 1543: 1028: 1879: 1706: 1646: 205:(DAPA) and a work-permit extension of DACA made alongside it, had been challenged by a coalition of 26 states led by Texas in the case 1820: 287:, based on a "plainly incorrect factual premise" that the DACA program was illegal simply because the DAPA had been found illegal via 1981: 1147: 2178: 2068: 1701: 1478: 1329: 2089: 2084: 2188: 1949: 1887: 1731: 1407: 228: 324:). As such, these injunctions were considered to have nationwide basis preventing the government from rescinding the program. 2340: 1903: 1845: 58:
National Immigration Law Center, Make the Road New York, Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization (LSO) of Yale Law School
809:"Preparing for the Future: Understanding the Rights and Options of DACA Recipients | Immigrant Legal Resource Center | ILRC" 2390: 2274: 2140: 1996: 1863: 644: 207: 808: 1840: 1773: 1651: 1053: 978: 1721: 833: 361:
was critical of the majority for not taking the opportunity for reviewing the constitutionality of the DACA as well.
2410: 2400: 2385: 2279: 2264: 2160: 1716: 1473: 1422: 1402: 1386: 1382: 1378: 82: 577:"The Impact of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Medical Students—A Scarce Resource to US Health Care" 2150: 1743: 1518: 1513: 2452: 2380: 2203: 1753: 1726: 1661: 1412: 284: 1175: 1118: 645:"The Role of the Executive in Rulemaking: An Exploration of Executive Action in United States Immigration Law" 2198: 1605: 1600: 1523: 1508: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1468: 1447: 1432: 681: 2446: 1871: 155:. Plaintiffs in the case are DACA recipients who argue that the rescission decision is unlawful under the 1933: 1676: 1671: 1437: 997: 631: 414: 327:
The government had begun the appeals process for each of these cases, with Vidal's case appealed to the
145: 1298: 2325: 2295: 2269: 2259: 2254: 2244: 2001: 1976: 121: 1548: 665:"Mobilizing a Community: The Effect of President Trump's Executive Orders on the Country's Interior" 90: 66: 2234: 1941: 1711: 1498: 1362: 904: 664: 223:, the Court was deadlocked, and left the injunction in place based on the Fifth Circuit's ruling. 2239: 2028: 1810: 715: 417:
and ordered the Department of Homeland Security to continue accepting DACA renewal applications.
256: 2395: 2370: 2249: 2229: 2053: 1896: 1758: 783: 723: 705: 606: 563: 553: 272: 1230: 151: (2020), was a case that was filed to challenge the Trump Administration's rescission of 2360: 2335: 2011: 1442: 1427: 596: 588: 201:
Prior to the Trump administration's rescission of DACA, the legality of a similar program,
2375: 2300: 1528: 358: 348:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California § Decision
232: 422:
Regents of the University of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security
2425: 2415: 2183: 1911: 1538: 1204:"Supreme Court rules against Trump's bid to end program shielding 'Dreamer' immigrants" 601: 576: 220: 148: 2468: 2305: 1152: 1082:"Federal Judge Upholds DACA, Calling White House Decision To Rescind It 'Capricious'" 309: 953: 2430: 2193: 1533: 354: 190: 635: 2146:
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
1656: 1590: 550:
Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook: A Comprehensive Outline and Reference Tool
465:
State of Texas, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kirstjen M. Nielsen, et al., Defendants.
2420: 727: 567: 28: 876:"Brooklyn Lawsuit Could Affect the Fate of Millions of Immigrants Nationwide" 619: 592: 247:
to challenge the agency's nationwide policy based on the circuit injunction.
2155: 2110: 1503: 1452: 1292:, No. 17-cv-9604 (PKC), 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25249 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2019) 736: 682:"Lessons About the Future of Immigration Law from the Rise and Fall of DACA" 1616:
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) (1996)
719: 610: 302:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
96:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
2048: 2016: 1748: 1738: 410:
Regents of Univ. of California v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.
2406:
National Korean American Service & Education Consortium (NAKASEC)
1814: 1626:
American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) (1998)
1621:
Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) (1997)
900:"DACA changed my life. I'm suing the Trump administration to save it" 1254:
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.
478:
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.
316:
also issued a similar injunction against the rescinding in the case
979:"As DACA Negotiations Drag On, a Judge in Brooklyn Could Intervene" 1611:
Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act (INTCA) 1994
954:"Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse" 1052:
de Vogue, Ariane; Berman, Dan; Park, Madison (January 10, 2018).
245:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
1208: 185: 1682:
Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States (2021)
1302: 832:
Shear, Michael D.; Davis, Julie Hirschfeld (5 September 2017).
217:
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
1642:
American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21) (2000)
1180: 1086: 1058: 1002: 1029:"Amended Memorandum & Order & Preliminary Injunction" 231:, and the Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic at the 1148:"A federal appeals court just ruled against Trump on DACA" 1054:"Judge blocks Trump administration plan to roll back DACA" 450:
Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Trump
314:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
271:
Vidal's case at the District Court was heard under Judge
1174:
Totenberg, Nina; Montanaro, Domenico (June 28, 2019).
834:"Trump Moves to End DACA and Calls on Congress to Act" 737:"Immigration Enforcement and the Future of Discretion" 2475:
United States immigration and naturalization case law
1647:
Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (LIFE Act) (2000)
1117:
National Immigration Law Center (February 13, 2019).
702:
Dreams Derailed: Undocumented Youths in the Trump Era
663:
Trucios-Haynes, Enid; Michael, Marianna (June 2018).
530:
In 2019, the Southern District of New York held that
329:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
2351:
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles
213:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
2439: 2314: 2288: 2222: 2169: 2103: 2077: 1960: 1854: 1789: 1694: 1634: 1557: 1461: 1395: 1371: 1350: 1337: 1290:
De Dandrade v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.
948: 946: 893: 891: 889: 536:
De Dandrade v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.
117: 112: 102: 78: 73: 62: 54: 46: 35: 21: 243:which handled the DACA system, around 2016 in the 241:United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 235:to obtain legal council and file suit against the 2095:United States Border Patrol interior checkpoints 860:(Press release). PennState Law. 23 January 2019. 784:"Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)" 435:Casa De Maryland v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. 2356:Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform 2034:List of people deported from the United States 1280:, 345 F. Supp. 3d 287 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2018) 1266:Gondal v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec. 998:"Second federal judge blocks move to end DACA" 869: 867: 505:Gondal v, United States Dep't of Homeland Sec. 1781:Trump administration family separation policy 1314: 1268:, 343 F. Supp. 3d 83 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2018) 855:"Litigation on DACA Rescission: What We Know" 237:United States Department of Homeland Security 186:Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) 153:Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) 8: 1831:Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) 927:"Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen - Yale Law School" 552:. American Immigration Lawyers Association. 2331:California Coalition for Immigration Reform 1027:Garaufis, Nicholas G. (February 13, 2018). 898:Vidal, MartĂ­n Batalla (September 6, 2017). 343:. Oral hearings were on November 12, 2019. 2366:Federation for American Immigration Reform 1347: 1321: 1307: 1299: 624:Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 18: 2141:Uniting American Families Act (2000–2013) 2136:Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act 2007 2126:Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act 2006 2069:Unaccompanied minors from Central America 1826:U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 1596:Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986) 600: 519:, the Eastern District of New York cited 394:has been consolidated with the appeal in 108:Motion for Preliminary Injunction Granted 2346:Center for Migration Studies of New York 1489:Immigration Act 1917 (Asian Barred Zone) 1358:Nationality law in the American Colonies 1119:"Litigation Related to the DACA Program" 203:Deferred Action for Parents of Americans 2280:"Faithful Patriot" (2018–present) 1836:Executive Office for Immigration Review 775: 2296:California DREAM Act (2006–2010) 1256:, 908 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. Nov. 8, 2018) 996:de Vogue, Ariana (February 13, 2018). 251:reversal of DACA, in violation of the 176:Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals 1544:Alien FiancĂ©es and FiancĂ©s Act (1946) 1112: 1110: 1108: 1106: 1104: 1022: 1020: 7: 2265:"Return to Sender" (2006–2007) 1570:Immigration and Nationality Act 1952 1176:"Supreme Court Takes Up DACA Appeal" 849: 847: 741:Roger Williams University Law Review 1951:Department of State v. Muñoz (2024) 1921:DHS v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. 1806:Immigration and Customs Enforcement 1408:Act to Encourage Immigration (1864) 680:Johnson, Kevin R. (November 2018). 643:Oliverio, Melina T. (Summer 2018). 2039:Mexico–United States border crisis 1821:U.S. Customs and Border Protection 480:, the Ninth Circuit distinguished 14: 2260:"Streamline" (2005–present) 1982:Central American migrant caravans 1529:Bracero Program (1942–1964) 1202:Higgens, Tucker (June 18, 2020). 620:"The Executive Power of Reversal" 581:American Journal of Public Health 2044:Mexico–United States border wall 1519:Filipino Repatriation Act (1935) 1330:Immigration to the United States 1080:Neuman, Scott (April 25, 2018). 752:Zoltan, Paul S. (January 2019). 735:Wadhia, Shoba (1 January 2018). 704:. University of Arkansas Press. 27: 1801:Department of Homeland Security 1235:National Immigration Law Center 1146:Lind, Dara (November 8, 2018). 977:Feuer, Alan (12 October 2017). 874:Feuer, Alan (10 October 2016). 788:Department of Homeland Security 229:National Immigration Law Center 182:Department of Homeland Security 165:Second Circuit Court of Appeals 2341:Center for Immigration Studies 2270:"Jump Start" (2006–2008) 2255:"Front Line" (2004–2005) 1905:Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting 1846:Office of Refugee Resettlement 1601:American Homecoming Act (1989) 472:Subsequent Treatment by Courts 1: 2391:Minuteman Civil Defense Corps 2235:"Peter Pan" (1960–1962) 1997:Eugenics in the United States 2059:Illegal immigrant population 1841:Board of Immigration Appeals 1677:Executive Order 13780 (2017) 1672:Executive Order 13769 (2017) 1565:UN Refugee Convention (1951) 1479:Gentlemen's Agreement (1907) 669:Lewis & Clark Law Review 490:Regents of the Univ. of Cal. 281:Administrative Procedure Act 253:Administrative Procedure Act 239:, the agency overseeing the 157:Administrative Procedure Act 2275:"Phalanx" (2010–2016) 2250:"Endgame" (2003–2012) 2121:McCain–Kennedy (2005) 2111:DREAM Act (2001–2010) 2090:Canada–United States border 2085:Mexico–United States border 1652:H-1B Visa Reform Act (2004) 1514:Tydings–McDuffie Act (1934) 618:Yoo, John C (Winter 2019). 211:, 579 U.S. ___ (2016). The 2491: 2411:Negative Population Growth 2401:National Immigration Forum 2386:Migration Policy Institute 2161:US Citizenship Act of 2021 1717:Temporary protected status 1499:Emergency Quota Act (1921) 1231:"DACA Litigation Timeline" 700:Schwab, William A (2019). 345: 134:(known at lower courts as 83:Certiorari before judgment 16:2020 US federal court case 1744:Security Advisory Opinion 652:Administrative Law Review 107: 69: (E.D.N.Y. 2018). 67:291 F.Supp.3d 260 26: 2453:Missing in Brooks County 2381:Mexicans Without Borders 1881:US v. Bhagat Singh Thind 1754:National Origins Formula 1438:Chinese Exclusion (1882) 1413:Civil Rights Act of 1866 593:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304910 548:Kurzban, Ira J. (2018). 396:Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen 378:Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen 308:. In April 2018, Judge 285:arbitrary and capricious 137:Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen 22:Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen 1732:Central American Minors 1662:Secure Fence Act (2006) 1524:Nationality Act of 1940 1474:Naturalization Act 1906 1448:Immigration Act of 1891 1433:Immigration Act of 1882 1423:Naturalization Act 1870 1403:Naturalization Law 1802 1379:Naturalization Act 1790 2447:Borderland (TV series) 2301:Arizona SB 1070 (2010) 1774:Unaccompanied children 1549:Luce–Celler Act (1946) 1339:Relevant colonial era, 289:United States v. Texas 208:United States v. Texas 180:On June 15, 2012, the 2024:Immigration reduction 1935:Niz-Chavez v. Garland 1539:War Brides Act (1945) 1418:14th Amendment (1868) 958:www.clearinghouse.net 689:U.C. Davis Law Review 415:nationwide injunction 93:, consolidated under 55:Counsel for plaintiff 2326:Arizona Border Recon 2306:Alabama HB 56 (2011) 2170:Immigration stations 2104:Proposed legislation 2002:Guest worker program 1977:Brooks County, Texas 1889:US v. Brignoni-Ponce 1606:Immigration Act 1990 1509:Immigration Act 1924 1494:Immigration Act 1918 1484:Immigration Act 1907 1469:Immigration Act 1903 443:District of Columbia 122:Nicholas G. Garaufis 2245:"Gatekeeper" (1994) 2172:and points of entry 2064:Reverse immigration 1943:Sanchez v. Mayorkas 1856:Supreme Court cases 1712:Visa Waiver Program 1707:Permanent residence 1534:Magnuson Act (1943) 1363:Plantation Act 1740 905:The Washington Post 386:NY v. Trump, et al. 91:588 U.S. ___ (2019) 2029:Immigration reform 1865:US v. Wong Kim Ark 1811:U.S. Border Patrol 1727:Green Card Lottery 1695:Visas and policies 1657:Real ID Act (2005) 1591:Refugee Act (1980) 1343:international laws 1332:and related topics 983:The New York Times 880:The New York Times 838:The New York Times 492:is different from 257:Due Process Clause 87:McAleenan v. Vidal 79:Subsequent actions 2462: 2461: 2396:Minuteman Project 2371:Improve The Dream 2289:State legislation 2240:"Babylift" (1975) 2214:Washington Avenue 2209:Sullivan's Island 2131:STRIVE Act (2007) 2054:March for America 2007:Human trafficking 1897:Zadvydas v. Davis 1759:Expedited removal 1690: 1689: 1341:United States and 758:Texas Bar Journal 754:"Immigration Law" 711:978-1-68226-083-8 559:978-1-57370-425-0 392:New York v. Trump 273:Nicholas Garaufis 127: 126: 50:February 13, 2018 2482: 2361:Community Change 2336:CASA of Maryland 2316:Non-governmental 2230:"Wetback" (1954) 2156:RAISE Act (2017) 2116:H.R. 4437 (2005) 1504:Cable Act (1922) 1453:Geary Act (1892) 1443:Scott Act (1888) 1348: 1323: 1316: 1309: 1300: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1269: 1263: 1257: 1251: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1227: 1221: 1220: 1218: 1216: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1190: 1188: 1171: 1165: 1164: 1162: 1160: 1143: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1123: 1114: 1099: 1098: 1096: 1094: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1066: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1040: 1038: 1033: 1024: 1015: 1014: 1012: 1010: 993: 987: 986: 974: 968: 967: 965: 964: 950: 941: 940: 938: 937: 923: 917: 916: 914: 912: 895: 884: 883: 871: 862: 861: 859: 851: 842: 841: 829: 823: 822: 820: 819: 805: 799: 798: 796: 795: 780: 765: 748: 731: 696: 686: 676: 659: 649: 639: 614: 604: 571: 365:Concurrent cases 283:(APA) as it was 184:established the 113:Court membership 31: 19: 2490: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2458: 2435: 2376:Mexica Movement 2319: 2317: 2310: 2284: 2218: 2171: 2165: 2151:SAFE Act (2015) 2099: 2073: 2012:Human smuggling 1987:Economic impact 1965: 1963: 1956: 1850: 1794: 1792: 1785: 1686: 1630: 1558:1950–1999 1553: 1462:1900–1949 1457: 1428:Page Act (1875) 1391: 1367: 1344: 1342: 1340: 1333: 1327: 1297: 1296: 1288: 1284: 1276: 1272: 1264: 1260: 1252: 1248: 1239: 1237: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1214: 1212: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1186: 1184: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1158: 1156: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1130: 1128: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1102: 1092: 1090: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1064: 1062: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1026: 1025: 1018: 1008: 1006: 995: 994: 990: 976: 975: 971: 962: 960: 952: 951: 944: 935: 933: 925: 924: 920: 910: 908: 897: 896: 887: 873: 872: 865: 857: 853: 852: 845: 831: 830: 826: 817: 815: 807: 806: 802: 793: 791: 782: 781: 777: 772: 751: 734: 712: 699: 684: 679: 662: 647: 642: 617: 574: 560: 547: 544: 542:Further reading 474: 461: 446: 431: 406: 374: 367: 359:Clarence Thomas 350: 297: 269: 261:Fifth Amendment 233:Yale Law School 215:had upheld the 199: 197:Case background 191:President Trump 178: 173: 161:Fifth Amendment 17: 12: 11: 5: 2488: 2486: 2478: 2477: 2467: 2466: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2456: 2449: 2443: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2434: 2433: 2428: 2426:Save Our State 2423: 2418: 2416:No More Deaths 2413: 2408: 2403: 2398: 2393: 2388: 2383: 2378: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2358: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2328: 2322: 2320: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2309: 2308: 2303: 2298: 2292: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2283: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2262: 2257: 2252: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2232: 2226: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2217: 2216: 2211: 2206: 2201: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2181: 2175: 2173: 2167: 2166: 2164: 2163: 2158: 2153: 2148: 2143: 2138: 2133: 2128: 2123: 2118: 2113: 2107: 2105: 2101: 2100: 2098: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2061: 2056: 2051: 2049:Labor shortage 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2009: 2004: 1999: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1979: 1974: 1968: 1966: 1962:Related issues 1961: 1958: 1957: 1955: 1954: 1947: 1939: 1931: 1917: 1913:Barton v. Barr 1909: 1901: 1893: 1885: 1877: 1869: 1860: 1858: 1852: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1843: 1838: 1833: 1828: 1823: 1818: 1808: 1803: 1797: 1795: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1784: 1783: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1771: 1761: 1756: 1751: 1746: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1729: 1724: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1687: 1685: 1684: 1679: 1674: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1628: 1623: 1618: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1584:Section 287(g) 1581: 1579:Section 212(f) 1567: 1561: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1552: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1536: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1465: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1399: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1390: 1389: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1366: 1365: 1360: 1354: 1352: 1345: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1318: 1311: 1303: 1295: 1294: 1282: 1278:Saget v. Trump 1270: 1258: 1246: 1222: 1194: 1166: 1138: 1100: 1072: 1044: 1016: 988: 969: 942: 918: 885: 863: 843: 824: 800: 774: 773: 771: 768: 767: 766: 749: 732: 710: 697: 677: 660: 640: 615: 587:(3): 429–431. 572: 558: 543: 540: 517:Saget v. Trump 473: 470: 460: 455: 445: 440: 430: 425: 405: 400: 373: 368: 366: 363: 346:Main article: 318:Trump v. NAACP 296: 293: 268: 267:District court 265: 221:Antonin Scalia 198: 195: 177: 174: 172: 169: 125: 124: 119: 115: 114: 110: 109: 105: 104: 100: 99: 80: 76: 75: 71: 70: 64: 60: 59: 56: 52: 51: 48: 44: 43: 37: 36:Full case name 33: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2487: 2476: 2473: 2472: 2470: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2442: 2440:Documentaries 2438: 2432: 2429: 2427: 2424: 2422: 2419: 2417: 2414: 2412: 2409: 2407: 2404: 2402: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2374: 2372: 2369: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2349: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2321: 2318:organizations 2313: 2307: 2304: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2294: 2293: 2291: 2287: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2263: 2261: 2258: 2256: 2253: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2243: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2227: 2225: 2221: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2184:Castle Garden 2182: 2180: 2177: 2176: 2174: 2168: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2154: 2152: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2122: 2119: 2117: 2114: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2080: 2076: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2010: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1990: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1972:2006 protests 1970: 1969: 1967: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1938: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1928: 1927:Wolf v. Vidal 1923: 1922: 1918: 1916: 1914: 1910: 1908: 1906: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1892: 1890: 1886: 1884: 1882: 1878: 1876: 1874: 1870: 1868: 1866: 1862: 1861: 1859: 1857: 1853: 1847: 1844: 1842: 1839: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1829: 1827: 1824: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1804: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1796: 1793:organizations 1788: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1757: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1747: 1745: 1742: 1740: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1723: 1720: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1693: 1683: 1680: 1678: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1637: 1633: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1556: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1537: 1535: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1400: 1398: 1394: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1374: 1370: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1336: 1331: 1324: 1319: 1317: 1312: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1301: 1291: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1247: 1236: 1232: 1226: 1223: 1211: 1210: 1205: 1198: 1195: 1183: 1182: 1177: 1170: 1167: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1142: 1139: 1127: 1120: 1113: 1111: 1109: 1107: 1105: 1101: 1089: 1088: 1083: 1076: 1073: 1061: 1060: 1055: 1048: 1045: 1030: 1023: 1021: 1017: 1005: 1004: 999: 992: 989: 984: 980: 973: 970: 959: 955: 949: 947: 943: 932: 928: 922: 919: 907: 906: 901: 894: 892: 890: 886: 881: 877: 870: 868: 864: 856: 850: 848: 844: 839: 835: 828: 825: 814: 810: 804: 801: 789: 785: 779: 776: 769: 763: 759: 755: 750: 747:(2): 353–368. 746: 742: 738: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 707: 703: 698: 695:(1): 343–389. 694: 690: 683: 678: 675:(2): 577–622. 674: 670: 666: 661: 658:(3): 715–743. 657: 653: 646: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 616: 612: 608: 603: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 573: 569: 565: 561: 555: 551: 546: 545: 541: 539: 537: 533: 532:Batalla Vidal 528: 526: 525:Batalla Vidal 522: 521:Batalla Vidal 518: 513: 510: 509:Batalla Vidal 506: 501: 499: 495: 494:Batalla Vidal 491: 487: 486:Batalla Vidal 483: 482:Batalla Vidal 479: 471: 469: 467: 466: 459: 456: 454: 452: 451: 444: 441: 439: 437: 436: 429: 426: 424: 423: 418: 416: 412: 411: 404: 401: 399: 397: 393: 389: 387: 382: 380: 379: 372: 369: 364: 362: 360: 356: 349: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 325: 323: 319: 315: 311: 310:John D. Bates 307: 304: 303: 295:Supreme Court 294: 292: 290: 286: 282: 276: 274: 266: 264: 262: 258: 254: 248: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 224: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 204: 196: 194: 192: 187: 183: 175: 170: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 143: 139: 138: 133: 132: 131:Wolf v. Vidal 123: 120: 118:Judge sitting 116: 111: 106: 101: 98: 97: 92: 88: 84: 81: 77: 72: 68: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 42: 38: 34: 30: 25: 20: 2451: 2431:Utah Compact 2194:Ellis Island 2179:Angel Island 1950: 1942: 1934: 1926: 1925: 1924: / 1920: 1912: 1904: 1895: 1888: 1880: 1872: 1864: 1635:21st century 1572: / 1396:19th century 1385: / 1381: / 1372:18th century 1351:Colonial era 1289: 1285: 1277: 1273: 1265: 1261: 1253: 1249: 1238:. Retrieved 1234: 1225: 1213:. Retrieved 1207: 1197: 1185:. Retrieved 1179: 1169: 1157:. Retrieved 1151: 1141: 1129:. Retrieved 1126:www.NILC.org 1125: 1091:. Retrieved 1085: 1075: 1063:. Retrieved 1057: 1047: 1035:. Retrieved 1007:. Retrieved 1001: 991: 982: 972: 961:. Retrieved 957: 934:. Retrieved 931:law.yale.edu 930: 921: 909:. Retrieved 903: 879: 837: 827: 816:. Retrieved 813:www.ilrc.org 812: 803: 792:. Retrieved 790:. 2012-07-11 787: 778: 761: 757: 744: 740: 701: 692: 688: 672: 668: 655: 651: 630:(1): 59–67. 627: 623: 584: 580: 549: 535: 531: 529: 524: 520: 516: 514: 508: 504: 502: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 475: 464: 463: 462: 457: 449: 448: 447: 442: 434: 433: 432: 427: 419: 409: 408: 407: 402: 395: 391: 385: 384: 383: 377: 376: 375: 370: 355:John Roberts 351: 340: 336: 332: 326: 321: 317: 305: 300: 298: 288: 277: 270: 249: 225: 206: 200: 179: 136: 135: 130: 129: 128: 94: 86: 74:Case history 39: 2189:East Boston 1873:Ozawa v. US 1702:Visa policy 1667:DACA (2012) 764:(1): 37–38. 720:j.ctv550cvv 496:because in 2421:NumbersUSA 2223:Operations 2204:San Ysidro 1964:and events 1791:Government 1240:2019-03-10 963:2019-03-10 936:2019-03-10 818:2019-02-27 794:2019-02-27 770:References 728:1050321330 636:2215489425 568:1040999709 403:California 390:Appeal in 171:Background 2199:Otay Mesa 2078:Geography 1764:Detention 85:granted, 2469:Category 2017:Coyotaje 1749:E-Verify 1739:US-VISIT 1215:June 18, 1187:June 20, 1159:June 20, 1131:March 9, 1093:June 20, 1065:June 20, 1037:March 9, 1009:June 20, 911:June 20, 632:ProQuest 611:30726129 428:Maryland 371:New York 159:and the 63:Citation 1992:Effects 602:6366484 498:Regents 312:of the 259:of the 103:Holding 47:Decided 1945:(2021) 1937:(2021) 1930:(2020) 1915:(2020) 1907:(2011) 1900:(2001) 1891:(1975) 1883:(1923) 1875:(1922) 1867:(1898) 1815:BORTAC 1769:Family 1722:Asylum 726:  718:  708:  634:  609:  599:  566:  556:  339:under 1122:(PDF) 1032:(PDF) 858:(PDF) 716:JSTOR 685:(PDF) 648:(PDF) 458:Texas 420:See: 337:NAACP 333:Vidal 322:NAACP 306:(DHS) 144: 1574:1965 1387:1798 1383:1795 1217:2020 1209:CNBC 1189:2020 1161:2020 1133:2019 1095:2020 1067:2020 1039:2019 1011:2020 913:2020 724:OCLC 706:ISBN 607:PMID 564:OCLC 554:ISBN 335:and 146:U.S. 1181:NPR 1153:Vox 1087:NPR 1059:CNN 1003:CNN 597:PMC 589:doi 585:109 515:In 503:In 476:In 341:DHS 263:." 149:___ 142:591 140:), 2471:: 1233:. 1206:. 1178:. 1150:. 1124:. 1103:^ 1084:. 1056:. 1019:^ 1000:. 981:. 956:. 945:^ 929:. 902:. 888:^ 878:. 866:^ 846:^ 836:. 811:. 786:. 762:82 760:. 756:. 745:23 743:. 739:. 722:. 714:. 693:52 691:. 687:. 673:22 671:. 667:. 656:70 654:. 650:. 628:42 626:. 622:. 605:. 595:. 583:. 579:. 562:. 398:. 167:. 89:, 1817:) 1813:( 1322:e 1315:t 1308:v 1243:. 1219:. 1191:. 1163:. 1135:. 1097:. 1069:. 1041:. 1013:. 985:. 966:. 939:. 915:. 882:. 840:. 821:. 797:. 730:. 638:. 613:. 591:: 570:. 388:: 320:(

Index


291 F.Supp.3d 260
Certiorari before judgment
588 U.S. ___ (2019)
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
Nicholas G. Garaufis
591
U.S.
___
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
Administrative Procedure Act
Fifth Amendment
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Department of Homeland Security
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
President Trump
Deferred Action for Parents of Americans
United States v. Texas
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Antonin Scalia
National Immigration Law Center
Yale Law School
United States Department of Homeland Security
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Administrative Procedure Act
Due Process Clause
Fifth Amendment
Nicholas Garaufis

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑