160:
Lord
Justice Thesiger said it was obvious that a salaried clerk was not a "servant" any more than were "the manager of a bank, a foreman with high wages, persons in the position almost of gentlemen."
115:
said it was obvious that a salaried clerk was not a "servant" any more than were "the manager of a bank, a foreman with high wages, persons in the position almost of gentlemen."
573:
317:
553:
157:
Lord
Justice Bramwell gave judgment said, "a servant is a person who is subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work."
303:
548:
277:
146:
There was a statutory exemption for duty on inhabited houses where premises were occupied by 'a servant or other person.... for the protection
425:
383:
343:
206:
101:
331:
189:
439:
221:
411:
355:
558:
467:
397:
568:
291:
138:(1880) 6 QBD 530, was an English tax law case which addressed the question of the division between master and servant.
104:: "a servant is a person who is subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work."
235:
563:
249:
154:
The Court of Appeal held that a clerk who earned £150 a year did not fall within the definition of servant.
492:
182:
72:
453:
226:
239:
263:
175:
523:
63:
decision: that a clerk who earned £150 a year did not fall within the definition of servant.
112:
60:
29:
401:
443:
429:
471:
457:
387:
373:
369:
211:
542:
497:
481:
415:
281:
267:
253:
359:
167:
503:
125:
171:
119:
108:
97:
92:
84:
79:
67:
56:
51:
43:
35:
25:
20:
319:Market Invest Ltd v Minister for Social Security
88:Lord Justice Bramwell and Lord Justice Thesiger
183:
8:
305:Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v SS for Pensions
190:
176:
168:
17:
574:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
278:Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof
7:
554:English vicarious liability case law
426:Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd
384:Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd
344:Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner
207:Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttenberg
14:
440:Muscat v Cable & Wireless Plc
222:Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
526:. Fujairah, UAE: LawTeacher.net
412:Carmichael v National Power plc
356:Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung
549:United Kingdom labour case law
522:Teacher, Law (November 2013).
332:O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
1:
468:Muschett v H M Prison Service
398:McMeechan v SS for Employment
292:Cassidy v Minister of Health
590:
236:Employment Rights Act 1996
198:Workplace protection cases
478:
464:
450:
436:
422:
408:
394:
380:
366:
352:
340:
328:
314:
300:
288:
274:
260:
246:
233:
218:
203:
124:
524:"Yewen v Noakes - 1880"
250:Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
493:Contract of employment
73:Contract of Employment
454:James v Greenwich LBC
559:Baron Bramwell cases
569:1880 in British law
488:
487:
264:Jivraj v Hashwani
131:
130:
581:
564:1880 in case law
535:
533:
531:
320:
306:
192:
185:
178:
169:
80:Court membership
21:Yewens V. Noakes
18:
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
580:
579:
578:
539:
538:
529:
527:
521:
518:
513:
489:
484:
474:
460:
446:
432:
418:
404:
390:
376:
362:
348:
336:
324:
318:
310:
304:
296:
284:
270:
256:
242:
229:
214:
199:
196:
166:
152:
144:
135:Yewens v Noakes
61:Court of Appeal
30:Exchequer Court
12:
11:
5:
587:
585:
577:
576:
571:
566:
561:
556:
551:
541:
540:
537:
536:
517:
514:
512:
509:
508:
507:
500:
495:
486:
485:
479:
476:
475:
465:
462:
461:
451:
448:
447:
437:
434:
433:
423:
420:
419:
409:
406:
405:
395:
392:
391:
381:
378:
377:
370:Hall v Lorimer
367:
364:
363:
353:
350:
349:
341:
338:
337:
329:
326:
325:
315:
312:
311:
301:
298:
297:
289:
286:
285:
275:
272:
271:
261:
258:
257:
247:
244:
243:
234:
231:
230:
219:
216:
215:
204:
201:
200:
197:
195:
194:
187:
180:
172:
165:
162:
151:
148:
143:
140:
129:
128:
122:
121:
117:
116:
110:
106:
105:
99:
95:
94:
90:
89:
86:
85:Judges sitting
82:
81:
77:
76:
69:
68:Related action
65:
64:
58:
54:
53:
49:
48:
45:
41:
40:
37:
33:
32:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
586:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
546:
544:
525:
520:
519:
515:
510:
506:
505:
501:
499:
498:UK labour law
496:
494:
491:
490:
483:
482:UK labour law
477:
473:
470:
469:
463:
459:
456:
455:
449:
445:
442:
441:
435:
431:
428:
427:
421:
417:
414:
413:
407:
403:
402:EWCA Civ 1166
400:
399:
393:
389:
386:
385:
379:
375:
372:
371:
365:
361:
358:
357:
351:
346:
345:
339:
334:
333:
327:
322:
321:
313:
308:
307:
299:
294:
293:
287:
283:
280:
279:
273:
269:
266:
265:
259:
255:
252:
251:
245:
241:
237:
232:
228:
224:
223:
217:
213:
209:
208:
202:
193:
188:
186:
181:
179:
174:
173:
170:
163:
161:
158:
155:
149:
147:
141:
139:
137:
136:
127:
123:
118:
114:
111:
107:
103:
100:
96:
93:Case opinions
91:
87:
83:
78:
75:
74:
70:
66:
62:
59:
57:Appealed from
55:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
528:. Retrieved
502:
466:
452:
444:EWCA Civ 220
438:
430:EWCA Civ 217
424:
410:
396:
382:
368:
354:
342:
330:
316:
302:
290:
276:
262:
248:
220:
205:
159:
156:
153:
145:
134:
133:
132:
71:
52:Case history
15:
472:EWCA Civ 25
458:EWCA Civ 35
388:EWCA Civ 37
374:EWCA Civ 25
109:Concurrence
98:Decision by
543:Categories
516:References
504:R v Negus
47:6 QBD 530
323:2 QB 173
309:2 QB 497
295:2 KB 343
227:C-397/01
164:See also
150:Judgment
120:Keywords
113:Thesiger
102:Bramwell
44:Citation
530:13 July
416:UKHL 47
347:ICR 612
335:ICR 730
282:UKSC 32
268:UKSC 40
254:UKSC 41
225:(2005)
212:C-66/85
210:(1986)
126:Tax law
36:Decided
360:UKPC 1
511:Notes
142:Facts
26:Court
532:2024
480:see
39:1880
240:230
545::
238:s
534:.
191:e
184:t
177:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.