1201:(NY: Plume/Penguin 1991), Chapter 13, pp. 171-176, especially its notorious riff on how a lawyer might edit -- and torture -- the phrase "The sky is blue" (pp. 172-174). Similarly, see Professor Fred Rodell's "Goodbye to Law Reviews," whose opening lines contain the classic statement of the problem: "There are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content." (This and other articles are collected in
386:
importance of some legal documents and the seriousness of the circumstances in which some legal documents are used. Yet not all formality in legal writing is justified. To the extent that formality produces transparency and precision, it is desirable. To the extent that formality hinders reader comprehension, it is less desirable. In particular, when legal content must be conveyed to nonlawyers, formality should give way to clear communication.
484:, legal opinions and other documents without attribution. Lawyers use forms documents when drafting documents such as contracts, wills, and judgments. The key difference between using phrases or paragraphs from other legal documents, and copying in other contexts or copying the entire document, arises from the fact that lawyers are effectively drawing upon a common pool of clauses that they adjust and modify for their own purposes.
122:
25:
515:
394:
A commercial lease for a small company using a small office space will likely be much shorter and will require less complexity, but may still be somewhat formal. But a proxy statement allowing the members of a neighborhood association to designate their voting preferences for the next board meeting ought to be as plain as can be. If informality aids that goal, it is justified.
584:, as a term, has been adopted in other languages. Legalese is characterized by long sentences, many modifying clauses, complex vocabulary, high abstraction, and insensitivity to the layman's need to understand the document's gist. Legalese arises most commonly in legal drafting, yet appears in both types of legal analysis.
397:
Many U.S. law schools teach legal writing in a way that acknowledges the technical complexity inherent in law and the justified formality that complexity often requires, but with an emphasis on clarity, simplicity, and directness. Yet many practicing lawyers, busy as they are with deadlines and heavy
591:
Public comprehensibility: Legalese suffers from being less comprehensible to the general public than plain
English, which can be important in both private (e.g., contracts) and public matters (e.g., laws, especially in democracies where the populace is seen as both responsible for and subject to the
440:
The persuasive document, a motion or a brief, attempts to persuade a deciding authority to favorably decide the dispute for the author's client. Motions and briefs are usually submitted to judges, but also to mediators, arbitrators, and others. In addition a persuasive letter may attempt to persuade
431:
The legal memorandum is the most common type of predictive legal analysis; it may include the client letter or legal opinion. The legal memorandum predicts the outcome of a legal question by analyzing the authorities governing the question and the relevant facts that gave rise to the legal question.
401:
Recently a variety of tools have been produced to allow writers to automate core parts of legal writing. For example, automated tools may be used by transactional lawyers to check certain formalities while writing, and tools exist to help litigators verify citations and quotations to legal authority
393:
Transaction documents—legal drafting—fall on a similar continuum. A 150-page merger agreement between two large corporations, in which both sides are represented by counsel, will be highly formal—and should also be accurate, precise, and airtight (features not always compatible with high formality).
447:
is the most rhetorically stylized. So although a brief states the legal issues, describes authorities, and applies authorities to the question—as does a memorandum—the brief's application portion is framed as an argument. The author argues for one approach to resolving the legal matter and does not
389:
What is crucial in setting the level of formality in any legal document is assessing the needs and expectations of the audience. For example, an appellate brief to the highest court in a jurisdiction calls for a formal style—this shows proper respect for the court and for the legal matter at issue.
456:
Legal drafting creates binding legal text. It includes enacted law like statutes, rule and regulations; contracts (private and public); personal legal documents like wills and trusts; and public legal documents like notices and instructions. Legal drafting requires no legal authority citation and
432:
It explains and applies the authorities in predicting an outcome, and ends with advice and recommendations. The legal memorandum also serves as record of the research done for a given legal question. Traditionally, and to meet the legal reader's expectations, it is formally organized and written.
385:
These features tend to make legal writing formal. This formality can take the form of long sentences, complex constructions, archaic and hyper-formal vocabulary, and a focus on content to the exclusion of reader needs. Some of this formality in legal writing is necessary and desirable, given the
469:
rules applicable to most other writers, with additional ethical implications for presenting copied materials as original. Legal memoranda and briefs must properly attribute quotations and source authorities; yet, within a law office, a lawyer might borrow from other lawyers' texts without
390:
An interoffice legal memorandum to a supervisor can probably be less formal—though not colloquial—because it is an in-house decision-making tool, not a court document. And an email message to a friend and client, updating the status of a legal matter, is appropriately informal.
609:
Coverage of contingencies: Legal writing faces a trade off in attempting to cover all possible contingencies while remaining reasonably brief. Legalese is characterized by a shift in priority towards the former of these concerns. For example, legalese commonly uses
618:
Plain-English advocates suggest that no document can possibly cover every contingency, and that lawyers should not attempt to encompass every contingency they can foresee. Rather, lawyers should only draft for the known, possible, reasonably expected contingencies.
398:
workloads, often resort to a template-based, outdated, hyperformal writing style in both analytical and transactional documents. This is understandable, but it sometimes unfortunately perpetuates an unnecessarily formal legal writing style.
418:
students must learn legal writing; the courses focus on: (1) predictive analysis, i.e., an outcome-predicting memorandum (positive or negative) of a given action for the attorney's client; and (2) persuasive analysis, e.g., motions and
143:. One form of legal writing involves drafting a balanced analysis of a legal problem or issue. Another form of legal writing is persuasive, and advocates in favor of a legal position. Another form legal writing involves drafting
172:
of authority. This is accomplished by a unique and complicated citation system, unlike that used in any other genre of writing. The standard methods for
American legal citation are defined by two competing rule books: the
496:
in legal writing involves an effort to avoid complex language and terminology in legal documents, to make legal writing more understandable and accessible. One of the goals of the movement is to reduce reliance on
600:
Its long history of use provides a similarly extensive background of precedent tied to the language. This precedent, as discussed above, will be a strong determinant of how documents written in legalese will be
271:
Archaic vocabulary: legal writing employs many old words and phrases that were formerly quotidian language, but today exist mostly or only in law, dating from the 16th century; English examples are
204:
to dismiss a lawsuit may use the same or a very similar form of motion again in another case, and so on. Many lawyers use and re-use written documents in this way and call these re-usable documents
1044:
614:(e.g., "null and void" and "dispute, controversy, or claim") which may appear redundant or unnecessary to laymen, but to a lawyer might reflect an important reference to distinct legal concepts.
423:. Although not as widely taught in law schools, legal drafting courses exist; other types of legal writing concentrate upon writing appeals or on interdisciplinary aspects of persuasion.
669:
480:
The drafting of legal documents such as contracts is different as, unlike in most other legal writing categories, it is common to use language and clauses that are derived from
410:
Legal writing is of two, broad categories: (i) legal analysis and (ii) legal drafting. Legal analysis is two-fold: (1) predictive analysis, and (2) persuasive analysis. In the
200:
and who has prepared a similar contract before will often re-use, with limited changes, the old contract for the new occasion. Or a lawyer who has filed a successful
604:
The legalese language itself may be more precise when compared to plain
English, having arisen from a need for such precision, among other things.
576:
is an
English term first used in 1914 for legal writing that is very difficult for laymen to read and understand, the implication being that this
853:
746:
716:
1103:
677:
1164:
781:
595:
Resistance to ambiguity: Legalese may be particularly resistant to misinterpretation, be it incidental or deliberate, for two reasons:
558:
108:
525:
168:
Legal writing places heavy reliance on authority. In most legal writing, the writer must back up assertions and statements with
1145:
501:, words that have a specific meaning within the context of the law, but that may carry a different meaning in other contexts.
1253:
46:
42:
1127:, written by Amy Krois-Lindner and TransLegal, is a coursebook for Cambridge ESOL’s International Legal English Certificate.
89:
587:
Some important points in the debate of "legalese" v. "plain language" as the continued standard for legal writing include:
61:
1134:(Oxford University Press) is regarded as an authoritative guide to legal language, and is aimed at the practising lawyer.
465:
In writing an objective analysis or a persuasive document, including a memorandum or brief, lawyers write under the same
1243:
1173:
written by Maria
Fraddosio (Naples, Edizioni Giuridiche Simone, 2008) is a course book for Italian University Students.
1183:
540:
68:
966:
536:
35:
1248:
1233:
939:
75:
1188:
1150:
648:
493:
376:) and are not italicized as English legal language, as would be foreign words in mainstream English writing.
1228:
854:"The Dark Side of Unattributed Copying and the Ethical Implications of Plagiarism in the Legal Profession"
57:
220:
884:
196:
Legal writing values precedent, as distinct from authority. For example, a lawyer who must prepare a
175:
911:
477:
articles, seminar papers, and similar writings intended to reflect the author's original thoughts.
754:
724:
444:
300:
152:
802:
1160:
1099:
1017:
144:
82:
1238:
326:
315:
314:
Loan words and phrases from other languages: In
English, this includes terms derived from
643:
633:
201:
169:
121:
1222:
638:
611:
572:
411:
348:
254:
470:
attribution, in using a well-phrased, successful argument made in a previous brief.
136:
1214:
Exercises for Legal
Writers I: Active and Passive Sentences and Writing with Verbs
828:
692:
420:
354:
264:
140:
126:
24:
188:. Different methods may be used within the United States and in other nations.
474:
466:
415:
372:
360:
342:
235:
1123:
1045:"estimación para el posterior deslinde en trámite de ejecución de sentencia"
628:
580:
is deliberate for excluding the legally untrained and to justify high fees.
577:
481:
332:
991:
782:"Legal Writing | Free Self Help Legal Information for Missouri Residents"
366:
320:
241:
197:
183:
148:
1070:
1096:
Hereof, Thereof, and
Everywhereof: A Contrarian Guide to Legal Drafting
139:
and presentation of arguments in documents such as legal memoranda and
498:
543:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
1213:
1208:
1205:, edited by Daniel R. White (NY: Plume/Penguin 1991), p. 241.)
1194:
For a humorous perspective on legal writing, see Daniel R. White's
473:
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited in academic work, especially in
337:
120:
229:
508:
18:
1203:
Trials and
Tribulations—An Anthology of Appealing Legal Humor
1179:, created by Scribes: The American Society of Legal Writers.
1098:(2 ed.). Chicago, Illinois: American Bar Association.
532:
248:
Ordinary words having different meanings in law, e.g.,
1158:
Legal
Language, Legal Writing & General English
1141:
is a reference book aimed at the practising lawyer.
227:Specialized words and phrases unique to law, e.g.,
49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
803:"Citations and References: Let the computer do it"
670:"Legal Research and Writing | Harvard Law School"
717:"Legal Citation Guides/Authorities (U.S. Based)"
946:. Plain Language Action and Information Network
457:generally is written without a stylized voice.
8:
967:"What is plain language law and why use it?"
747:"Citation Guides from Foreign Jurisdictions"
1184:The Oxford Handbook of Legal Correspondence
1209:Exercises for Legal Writers II: Wordiness
1191:and published by Oxford University Press.
559:Learn how and when to remove this message
109:Learn how and when to remove this message
809:. Southern Connecticut State University
660:
852:Strickland, Cooper J. (1 March 2012).
223:that can be categorized in four ways:
7:
1177:The Scribes Journal of Legal Writing
912:"Copyright and the Contract Drafter"
910:Adams, Kenneth A. (23 August 2006).
883:Dunnewold, Mary (1 September 2011).
776:
774:
772:
47:adding citations to reliable sources
178:: A Professional System of Citation
885:"Plagiarism: Proceed with Caution"
16:Pleading in civil and criminal law
14:
1171:New ELS: English for Law Students
965:Butt, Peter (12 September 2002).
833:LII / Legal Information Institute
697:LII / Legal Information Institute
1137:Peter Butt and Richard Castle’s
1132:Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage
753:. 24 August 2017. Archived from
723:. 24 August 2017. Archived from
513:
23:
940:"Bryan Garner on Plain English"
219:Legal writing extensively uses
34:needs additional citations for
1199:The Official Lawyer's Handbook
996:Online Etymological Dictionary
612:doublets and triplets of words
441:the dispute's opposing party.
186:: A Uniform System of Citation
1:
1094:Darmstadter, Howard (2008).
1069:Lundin, Leigh (2009-12-31).
448:present a neutral analysis.
125:Books on legal writing at a
1153:and published by Routledge.
1124:International Legal English
539:the claims made and adding
268:(a principal in a lawsuit).
1270:
971:Law and Justice Foundation
891:. American Bar Association
751:Harvard Law School Library
721:Harvard Law School Library
1071:"Buzzwords—Bang * Splat!"
858:North Carolina Law Review
436:Persuasive legal analysis
427:Predictive legal analysis
262:(to sign to effect), and
258:(support for a promise),
135:involves the analysis of
691:LII Staff (2007-08-06).
402:for motions and briefs.
807:Hilton C. Buley Library
649:Legal Writing Institute
494:Plain Language Movement
488:Plain language movement
159:Distinguishing features
1024:. Babylon Software Ltd
129:
1254:Writing-related lists
1139:Modern Legal Drafting
668:School, Harvard Law.
221:technical terminology
124:
919:New York Law Journal
889:ABA For Law Students
176:ALWD Citation Manual
43:improve this article
1244:Legal communication
208:or, less commonly,
674:Harvard Law School
524:possibly contains
445:Persuasive writing
301:pronominal adverbs
130:
944:plainlanguage.gov
569:
568:
561:
526:original research
145:legal instruments
119:
118:
111:
93:
1261:
1249:Legal literature
1234:English language
1110:
1109:
1105:978-1-59031-9772
1091:
1085:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1066:
1060:
1059:
1057:
1055:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1029:
1022:Babylon (French)
1014:
1008:
1007:
1005:
1003:
998:. Douglas Harper
988:
982:
981:
979:
977:
962:
956:
955:
953:
951:
936:
930:
929:
927:
925:
916:
907:
901:
900:
898:
896:
880:
874:
873:
871:
869:
849:
843:
842:
840:
839:
825:
819:
818:
816:
814:
799:
793:
792:
790:
789:
778:
767:
766:
764:
762:
743:
737:
736:
734:
732:
713:
707:
706:
704:
703:
688:
682:
681:
676:. Archived from
665:
564:
557:
553:
550:
544:
541:inline citations
517:
516:
509:
311:(as adjectives).
114:
107:
103:
100:
94:
92:
51:
27:
19:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1219:
1218:
1130:Bryan Garner’s
1119:
1114:
1113:
1106:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1079:
1077:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1053:
1051:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1027:
1025:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1001:
999:
990:
989:
985:
975:
973:
964:
963:
959:
949:
947:
938:
937:
933:
923:
921:
914:
909:
908:
904:
894:
892:
882:
881:
877:
867:
865:
851:
850:
846:
837:
835:
829:"legal writing"
827:
826:
822:
812:
810:
801:
800:
796:
787:
785:
780:
779:
770:
760:
758:
745:
744:
740:
730:
728:
715:
714:
710:
701:
699:
693:"Legal writing"
690:
689:
685:
667:
666:
662:
657:
625:
565:
554:
548:
545:
530:
518:
514:
507:
490:
463:
454:
438:
429:
408:
383:
217:
194:
166:
161:
115:
104:
98:
95:
58:"Legal writing"
52:
50:
40:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1267:
1265:
1257:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1192:
1180:
1174:
1168:
1165:978-9351451228
1154:
1142:
1135:
1128:
1118:
1117:External links
1115:
1112:
1111:
1104:
1086:
1075:Criminal Brief
1061:
1035:
1009:
983:
957:
931:
902:
875:
844:
820:
794:
768:
738:
708:
683:
680:on 2018-10-31.
659:
658:
656:
653:
652:
651:
646:
644:Plain language
641:
636:
634:Business speak
631:
624:
621:
616:
615:
606:
605:
602:
597:
596:
593:
567:
566:
521:
519:
512:
506:
503:
489:
486:
462:
459:
453:
452:Legal drafting
450:
437:
434:
428:
425:
407:
404:
382:
379:
378:
377:
312:
269:
246:
216:
213:
193:
190:
165:
162:
160:
157:
117:
116:
99:September 2011
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1266:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1229:Legal writing
1227:
1226:
1224:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1200:
1198:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1156:B.M.Gandhi's
1155:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:Legal English
1143:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1107:
1101:
1097:
1090:
1087:
1076:
1072:
1065:
1062:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1036:
1023:
1019:
1013:
1010:
997:
993:
987:
984:
972:
968:
961:
958:
945:
941:
935:
932:
920:
913:
906:
903:
890:
886:
879:
876:
863:
859:
855:
848:
845:
834:
830:
824:
821:
808:
804:
798:
795:
783:
777:
775:
773:
769:
757:on 2018-02-26
756:
752:
748:
742:
739:
727:on 2018-02-26
726:
722:
718:
712:
709:
698:
694:
687:
684:
679:
675:
671:
664:
661:
654:
650:
647:
645:
642:
640:
639:Plain English
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
626:
622:
620:
613:
608:
607:
603:
599:
598:
594:
590:
589:
588:
585:
583:
579:
575:
574:
563:
560:
552:
542:
538:
534:
528:
527:
522:This section
520:
511:
510:
504:
502:
500:
495:
487:
485:
483:
478:
476:
471:
468:
460:
458:
451:
449:
446:
442:
435:
433:
426:
424:
422:
417:
413:
412:United States
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
380:
375:
374:
369:
368:
363:
362:
357:
356:
351:
350:
349:habeas corpus
345:
344:
339:
335:
334:
329:
328:
323:
322:
317:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
261:
257:
256:
255:consideration
251:
247:
244:
243:
238:
237:
232:
231:
226:
225:
224:
222:
214:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
191:
189:
187:
185:
179:
177:
171:
163:
158:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:fact patterns
134:
133:Legal writing
128:
123:
113:
110:
102:
91:
88:
84:
81:
77:
74:
70:
67:
63:
60: –
59:
55:
54:Find sources:
48:
44:
38:
37:
32:This article
30:
26:
21:
20:
1202:
1196:
1195:
1189:Rupert Haigh
1182:
1176:
1170:
1157:
1151:Rupert Haigh
1144:
1138:
1131:
1122:
1095:
1089:
1078:. Retrieved
1074:
1064:
1052:. Retrieved
1048:
1038:
1026:. Retrieved
1021:
1012:
1000:. Retrieved
995:
986:
974:. Retrieved
970:
960:
948:. Retrieved
943:
934:
922:. Retrieved
918:
905:
893:. Retrieved
888:
878:
866:. Retrieved
861:
857:
847:
836:. Retrieved
832:
823:
811:. Retrieved
806:
797:
786:. Retrieved
784:. 2016-03-04
759:. Retrieved
755:the original
750:
741:
729:. Retrieved
725:the original
720:
711:
700:. Retrieved
696:
686:
678:the original
673:
663:
617:
601:interpreted.
586:
581:
578:abstruseness
571:
570:
555:
546:
523:
499:terms of art
491:
479:
472:
464:
455:
443:
439:
430:
409:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
371:
365:
359:
353:
347:
341:
331:
325:
319:
308:
304:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
263:
259:
253:
249:
240:
234:
228:
218:
209:
205:
195:
181:
174:
167:
132:
131:
105:
96:
86:
79:
72:
65:
53:
41:Please help
36:verification
33:
1054:25 February
1042:See, e.g.,
1028:25 February
1002:25 February
976:25 February
950:25 February
813:25 February
761:25 February
731:25 February
549:August 2013
416:law schools
355:prima facie
252:(lawsuit),
127:law library
1223:Categories
1187:(2006) by
1149:(2004) by
1080:2010-02-19
1018:"Legalese"
992:"legalese"
838:2024-07-23
788:2024-06-21
702:2018-10-31
655:References
533:improve it
482:form books
475:law review
467:plagiarism
461:Plagiarism
414:, in most
406:Categories
373:sub judice
361:inter alia
343:certiorari
285:heretofore
236:fee simple
215:Vocabulary
147:, such as
69:newspapers
629:Academese
537:verifying
381:Formality
333:voir dire
297:wherefore
206:templates
192:Precedent
170:citations
164:Authority
149:contracts
1049:ProZ.com
864:(3): 920
623:See also
582:Legalese
573:Legalese
505:Legalese
367:mens rea
321:estoppel
289:herewith
242:novation
198:contract
184:Bluebook
924:9 April
895:9 April
868:9 April
531:Please
293:whereby
260:execute
83:scholar
1239:Jargon
1163:
1102:
592:laws).
421:briefs
336:) and
330:, and
327:laches
316:French
295:, and
281:hereby
277:hereto
273:herein
250:action
239:, and
210:forms.
202:motion
141:briefs
85:
78:
71:
64:
56:
1197:Still
915:(PDF)
338:Latin
265:party
153:wills
90:JSTOR
76:books
1161:ISBN
1100:ISBN
1056:2018
1030:2018
1004:2018
978:2018
952:2018
926:2018
897:2018
870:2018
815:2018
763:2018
733:2018
492:The
309:such
307:and
305:said
230:tort
182:The
180:and
151:and
62:news
535:by
303:);
45:by
1225::
1073:.
1047:.
1020:.
994:.
969:.
942:.
917:.
887:.
862:90
860:.
856:.
831:.
805:.
771:^
749:.
719:.
695:.
672:.
370:,
364:,
358:,
352:,
346:,
324:,
291:,
287:,
283:,
279:,
275:,
233:,
155:.
1167:.
1108:.
1083:.
1058:.
1032:.
1006:.
980:.
954:.
928:.
899:.
872:.
841:.
817:.
791:.
765:.
735:.
705:.
562:)
556:(
551:)
547:(
529:.
340:(
318:(
299:(
245:.
112:)
106:(
101:)
97:(
87:·
80:·
73:·
66:·
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
