Knowledge (XXG)

Presumption

Source 📝

408: 121: 542:
time of the operation of the vehicle as at the time of the offence. If the test is conducted outside the two hours, and the blood alcohol concentration is greater than 20 mg of alcohol/100 mL of blood, there is now a conclusive presumption that the blood alcohol concentration can be increased by 5 mg of alcohol/100 mL of blood for each 30 minutes.
570:, if it is found that the defendant intentionally deceived the complainant as to the "nature or the purpose of the act", or if "the defendant intentionally induced the complainant to consent by impersonation of a "person known personally to the complainant"" it can be conclusively presumed the defendant is guilty of rape and must be convicted. 952: 392:
constitutional requirements. The party challenging the constitutionality of a statute bears the burden of proof, and any doubts are resolved against that party. If there are two reasonable interpretations of a statute, one of which is constitutional and the other not, the courts choose the path that
541:
Recent amendments to Impaired Driving law allows the Crown to rely on a conclusive presumption. Normally, where the police conduct a breathalyzer test within 2 hours of the operation of a conveyance (or care and control), the court can accept the blood alcohol concentration as being the same at the
71:
can reject a rebuttable presumption based on other evidence. Conversely, a conclusive/irrebuttable presumption cannot be challenged by contradictory facts or evidence. Sometimes, a presumption must be triggered by a predicate fact—that is, the fact must be found before the presumption applies.
532:
In Australian law, it is a conclusive presumption that no child under the age of 10 can be held responsible for criminal action. This presumption exists to protect children by acknowledging that they do not have sufficient development to understand the gravity and consequences of committing a
349:) decision made on 27 February 1970 thought there was "every reason to presume that reasonable parties will wish to have the relationships created by their contract and the claims arising therefrom ... decided by the same tribunal and not by two different tribunals", and the 336:
In commercial contracts, there is a presumption that parties to a contract intend all disputes between them to be determined within the same forum. This presumption is also known as "one-stop adjudication" and reflects the belief that contracts are entered into by
229:. A person who has been absent for seven years without explanation and "gone to parts unknown" is presumed dead at common law. The time period it takes for the presumption to arise has often been modified by statute. 996:
John Davison Lawson. The Law of Presumptive Evidence: Including Presumptions both of Law and of Fact, and the Burden of Proof both in Civil and Criminal Cases, Reduced to Rules. Bancroft-Whitney Company. 1886.
979:
John Hubbersty Mathews and Benjamin Rand. A Treatise on the Doctrine of Presumption and Presumptive Evidence: As Affecting the Title to Real and Personal Property. Gould, Banks and Company. New York. 1830.
236:. A person who faces criminal trial is presumed sane until the opposite is proved. Similarly, a person is presumed to have testamentary capacity until there is evidence to undermine that presumption. 95:, where, for example, if there was doubt as to whether a child was really the issue of someone who had been left money in a will, the presumption was in favour of the child. Medieval Roman and 558:. The age has continually been under debate with adjustments being made in line with rulings, the results of psychological research and to some extent public pressure. The age was seven at 357:(2006) referred to a "sensible commercial presumption that the parties did not intend the inconvenience of having possible disputes from their transaction being heard in two places". The 322:
is another way of expressing a burden of proof: the official acts of courts are presumed valid, and those who would challenge them must overcome this presumption. This is also termed the
281:
intend for the survivors to have the assets put into the fund upon the death of one of the joint account holders has also been called the "presumption of survivorship".
266:. Some jurisdictions also hold that a presumption of paternity arises when a father accepts a child into his home, or publicly represents that he is the child's father. 243:, which holds that the prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal case with the result that the accused may be acquitted without putting forward any evidence. 986:
William Mawdesley Best. A Treatise on Presumptions of Law and Fact, with the Theory and Rules of Presumptive or Circumstantial Proof in Criminal Cases. London. 1844.
698: 273:
has referred to a number of different presumptions. The term is sometimes used to refer to presumptions that one or another of two persons lived the longer when
55:". There are two types of presumptions: rebuttable presumptions and irrebuttable (or conclusive) presumptions. A rebuttable presumption will either shift the 877: 99:
graded presumptions according to strength: light, medium or probable, and violent. These gradings and many individual presumptions were taken over into
358: 1029: 895:
Premium Nafta Products Limited (20th Defendant) and others (Respondents) v. Fili Shipping Company Limited (14th Claimant) and others (Appellants)
850:
Cooper, Simon & Murphy, Peter & Beaumont, John. Cases & Materials on Evidence. Fourth Edition. Oxford University Press. 1994. p. 86
88:), propositions taken to be true unless there was reason to believe otherwise, such as "One does not ordinarily pay a debt before term." 563: 370: 389: 788: 491: 385: 204: 429: 422: 142: 135: 381: 31: 551: 521: 472: 185: 860: 444: 157: 631: 96: 657: 451: 350: 330: 164: 418: 131: 780: 615: 566:
to eight (section 50) and by the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 to ten, at which it remains. In the case of
323: 270: 247: 377: 346: 251: 240: 458: 258:
of a child born to his wife during the marriage, or within nine months after the marriage is ended by death,
171: 366: 319: 304: 285: 1024: 579: 440: 233: 153: 64: 919: 520:
and must be taken to be the case whatever the evidence to the contrary. For example, a child below the
606: 226: 56: 365:(2007) noted that "this approach to the issue of construction is now firmly embedded as part of the 1008: 679: 554:
cannot be held legally responsible for their actions, and so cannot be convicted of committing a
373:
made on this basis, stating that this presumption "must now be accepted as part of our law too".
274: 784: 312: 255: 931: 991: 987: 981: 669: 555: 259: 300: 465: 178: 363:
Premium Nafta Products Ltd (20th Defendant) and Ors v. Fili Shipping Company Ltd and Ors
517: 289: 60: 1018: 683: 278: 68: 894: 308: 658:"Fighting the Establishment: The Need for Procedural Reform of Our Paternity Laws" 504:
A conclusive presumption, also known as an irrebuttable presumption, is a type of
67:(requiring the disadvantaged party to show the presumption is wrong); in short, a 998: 674: 584: 509: 407: 120: 104: 100: 953:"Rape and Sexual Offences - Chapter 6: Consent | The Crown Prosecution Service" 559: 218: 333:
in relation to transfers from husbands to wives and from fathers to children.
288:
presumes that a properly addressed letter delivered to the post office or a
92: 48: 610: 513: 338: 17: 263: 81: 1004: 920:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cpa1987261/s5.html
878:
One-stop adjudication – the rational approach to dispute resolution
512:, a conclusive presumption is a presumption of law that cannot be 296: 930:
Thomas Crofts, Doli Incapax: Why Children Deserve its Protection
729:
The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal
567: 52: 897:, UKHL 40, delivered 17 October 2007, accessed 18 January 2024 401: 114: 40: 815:
U-Haul Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Dept. of State Revenue
932:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurUEJL/2003/26.html
384:
presumes that all statutes are drafted in accordance with
277:. The presumption that two or more people who establish a 355:
Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd.
315:
applies the other person's assets to their own benefit.
221:
jurisdictions. Examples of these presumptions include:
829:, 919 N.E.2d 1181, (Ind.Ct.App. 2010), trans. denied 524:
is presumed to be incapable of committing a felony.
292:
was in fact delivered and received by the addressee.
867:, published 19 March 2015, accessed 18 January 2024 59:(requiring the disadvantaged party to produce some 884:, published 10 June 2015, accessed 18 January 2024 722: 720: 718: 716: 1005:"Irrebuttable Presumptions: An Illusory Analysis" 839:Monon Corp. v. Townsend, Yosha, Cline & Price 601: 599: 8: 918:Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 s5 731:. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 217:A number of presumptions are found in most 841:, 678 N.E.2d 807, 809 (Ind.Ct.App. 1997). 791:), p. 1068, "Presumption of survivorship" 673: 492:Learn how and when to remove this message 205:Learn how and when to remove this message 27:In law, an inference of a particular fact 861:Fiona Trust v Privalov in the High Court 84:, included reasoning from presumptions ( 30:For the term in Catholic canon law, see 744:, 197 Ind. 50, 149 N.E. 718 (Ind. 1925) 651: 649: 595: 303:arises where a person in a position of 275:they died together in the same accident 254:, which presumes that a husband is the 783:(5th. ed., 1979; West Publishing Co., 428:Please improve this section by adding 141:Please improve this section by adding 91:The same concept was found in ancient 398:Conclusive (irrebuttable) presumption 7: 662:Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 742:Prudential Insurance Comp. v. Moore 564:Children and Young Persons Act 1933 508:used in several legal systems. In 25: 80:The ancient Jewish law code, the 817:, 896 N.E.2d 1253 (Ind.Tax 2008) 406: 382:presumption of constitutionality 119: 32:Presumption (Catholic canon law) 882:Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP 1030:Legal doctrines and principles 552:age of criminal responsibility 522:age of criminal responsibility 393:permits upholding the statute. 103:in the seventeenth century by 1: 430:secondary or tertiary sources 367:law of international commerce 143:secondary or tertiary sources 804:, 622 N.E.2d 476 (Ind. 1993) 369:" and endorsed a ruling the 909:, 675 N.E.2d 318 (Ind.1996) 771:E.g. Ind. Code § 31-14-7-2. 762:E.g. Ind. Code § 31-14-7-1. 675:10.36641/mjgl.21.1.fighting 341:business parties. A German 271:presumption of survivorship 1046: 753:E.g. Ind. Code § 29-2-5-1. 699:"Evidentiary Presumptions" 351:Federal Court of Australia 331:presumption of advancement 29: 907:Boehm v. Town of St. John 802:Matter of Estate of Banko 636:The Cornell Law Quarterly 324:presumption of regularity 248:presumption of legitimacy 656:Rogus, Caroline (2014). 378:law of the United States 347:Federal Court of Justice 307:over another, such as a 252:presumption of paternity 241:presumption of innocence 63:to the contrary) or the 942:Criminal Code 320.31(4) 865:Herbert Smith Freehills 827:In re Estate of Compton 697:Hall, Keith B. (1998). 320:presumption of validity 990:. Philadelphia. 1845. 781:Black's Law Dictionary 630:Fisk, Otis H. (1925). 616:Black's Law Dictionary 417:relies excessively on 286:presumption of mailing 130:relies excessively on 727:Franklin, J. (2001). 607:Black, Henry Campbell 580:Legal burden of proof 234:presumption of sanity 111:Specific presumptions 591:Notes and references 562:, and raised by the 227:presumption of death 57:burden of production 1009:Stanford Law Review 1003:Phillips, John M., 311:or the holder of a 295:The presumption of 550:A child below the 703:Tulane Law Review 546:England and Wales 502: 501: 494: 476: 343:Bundesgerichtshof 313:power of attorney 256:biological father 215: 214: 207: 189: 16:(Redirected from 1037: 968: 967: 965: 963: 949: 943: 940: 934: 928: 922: 916: 910: 904: 898: 893:House of Lords, 891: 885: 874: 868: 857: 851: 848: 842: 836: 830: 824: 818: 811: 805: 798: 792: 778: 772: 769: 763: 760: 754: 751: 745: 739: 733: 732: 724: 711: 710: 694: 688: 687: 677: 653: 644: 643: 627: 621: 620: 603: 556:criminal offence 497: 490: 486: 483: 477: 475: 434: 410: 402: 260:legal separation 210: 203: 199: 196: 190: 188: 147: 123: 115: 51:of a particular 21: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1015: 1014: 976: 974:Further reading 971: 961: 959: 951: 950: 946: 941: 937: 929: 925: 917: 913: 905: 901: 892: 888: 875: 871: 858: 854: 849: 845: 837: 833: 825: 821: 812: 808: 799: 795: 779: 775: 770: 766: 761: 757: 752: 748: 740: 736: 726: 725: 714: 696: 695: 691: 655: 654: 647: 629: 628: 624: 605: 604: 597: 593: 576: 548: 539: 530: 498: 487: 481: 478: 435: 433: 427: 423:primary sources 411: 400: 371:Court of Appeal 301:undue influence 211: 200: 194: 191: 148: 146: 140: 136:primary sources 124: 113: 78: 65:burden of proof 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1043: 1041: 1033: 1032: 1027: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1001: 994: 984: 975: 972: 970: 969: 944: 935: 923: 911: 899: 886: 869: 852: 843: 831: 819: 806: 793: 773: 764: 755: 746: 734: 712: 689: 645: 632:"Presumptions" 622: 594: 592: 589: 588: 587: 582: 575: 572: 547: 544: 538: 535: 533:criminal act. 529: 526: 500: 499: 414: 412: 405: 399: 396: 395: 394: 374: 359:House of Lords 334: 327: 316: 293: 290:common carrier 282: 267: 244: 237: 230: 213: 212: 127: 125: 118: 112: 109: 77: 74: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1042: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1000: 995: 993: 989: 985: 983: 978: 977: 973: 958: 954: 948: 945: 939: 936: 933: 927: 924: 921: 915: 912: 908: 903: 900: 896: 890: 887: 883: 879: 873: 870: 866: 862: 856: 853: 847: 844: 840: 835: 832: 828: 823: 820: 816: 810: 807: 803: 797: 794: 790: 789:0-8299-2041-2 786: 782: 777: 774: 768: 765: 759: 756: 750: 747: 743: 738: 735: 730: 723: 721: 719: 717: 713: 708: 704: 700: 693: 690: 685: 681: 676: 671: 668:(1): 67–122. 667: 663: 659: 652: 650: 646: 641: 637: 633: 626: 623: 618: 617: 612: 611:"Presumption" 608: 602: 600: 596: 590: 586: 583: 581: 578: 577: 573: 571: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 545: 543: 536: 534: 527: 525: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 496: 493: 485: 474: 471: 467: 464: 460: 457: 453: 450: 446: 443: –  442: 441:"Presumption" 438: 437:Find sources: 431: 425: 424: 420: 415:This section 413: 409: 404: 403: 397: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 332: 328: 325: 321: 317: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 291: 287: 283: 280: 279:joint account 276: 272: 268: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 238: 235: 231: 228: 224: 223: 222: 220: 209: 206: 198: 187: 184: 180: 177: 173: 170: 166: 163: 159: 156: –  155: 154:"Presumption" 151: 150:Find sources: 144: 138: 137: 133: 128:This section 126: 122: 117: 116: 110: 108: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 87: 83: 75: 73: 70: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 37: 33: 19: 1025:Evidence law 1007:, (1975) 27 999:Google Books 992:Google Books 988:Google Books 982:Google Books 960:. Retrieved 956: 947: 938: 926: 914: 906: 902: 889: 881: 872: 864: 859:Peacock, N, 855: 846: 838: 834: 826: 822: 814: 809: 801: 796: 776: 767: 758: 749: 741: 737: 728: 706: 702: 692: 665: 661: 639: 635: 625: 614: 549: 540: 531: 505: 503: 488: 479: 469: 462: 455: 448: 436: 416: 362: 354: 342: 216: 201: 192: 182: 175: 168: 161: 149: 129: 90: 85: 79: 44: 38: 36: 585:Prima facie 510:English law 506:presumption 105:Edward Coke 101:English law 69:fact finder 45:presumption 1019:Categories 957:cps.gov.uk 876:Hart, S., 709:: 1321–28. 560:common law 452:newspapers 419:references 219:common law 165:newspapers 132:references 684:152740413 528:Australia 97:canon law 93:Roman law 49:inference 642:: 20–40. 609:(1990). 574:See also 518:evidence 514:rebutted 482:May 2023 339:rational 309:guardian 195:May 2023 61:evidence 18:Presumed 466:scholar 386:Federal 376:In the 264:divorce 179:scholar 86:hazakah 76:History 47:is an " 962:6 July 787:  682:  537:Canada 468:  461:  454:  447:  439:  380:, the 181:  174:  167:  160:  152:  82:Talmud 813:E.g. 800:E.g. 680:S2CID 473:JSTOR 459:books 390:state 305:trust 297:fraud 262:, or 186:JSTOR 172:books 964:2021 785:ISBN 568:rape 445:news 388:and 329:The 318:The 284:The 246:The 239:The 232:The 225:The 158:news 53:fact 43:, a 1011:449 670:doi 516:by 421:to 361:in 353:in 299:or 250:or 134:to 41:law 39:In 1021:: 955:. 880:, 863:, 715:^ 707:72 705:. 701:. 678:. 666:21 664:. 660:. 648:^ 640:11 638:. 634:. 613:. 598:^ 432:. 269:A 145:. 107:. 966:. 686:. 672:: 619:. 495:) 489:( 484:) 480:( 470:· 463:· 456:· 449:· 426:. 345:( 326:. 208:) 202:( 197:) 193:( 183:· 176:· 169:· 162:· 139:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Presumed
Presumption (Catholic canon law)
law
inference
fact
burden of production
evidence
burden of proof
fact finder
Talmud
Roman law
canon law
English law
Edward Coke

references
primary sources
secondary or tertiary sources
"Presumption"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
common law
presumption of death
presumption of sanity
presumption of innocence
presumption of legitimacy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.