125:
110:
132:
In the example to the left, the objector can't find anything contentious in the stated premises of the argument supporting the conclusion that "There is no danger in NASA's
Stardust Mission bringing material from the Wild 2 comet back to Earth", but still disagrees with the conclusion. The objection
133:
is therefore placed beside the main premise and exactly corresponds to an unstated or 'hidden' co-premise. This is demonstrated by the argument map to the right in which the full pattern of reasoning relating to the contention is set out.
92:
and main contention. For a given simple argument, if the assumption is made that its premises are correct, fault may be found in the progression from these to the conclusion of the argument. This can often take the form of an unstated
101:. In other words, it may be necessary to make an assumption in order to conclude anything from a set of true statements. This assumption must also be true in order that the conclusion follow logically from the initial statements.
68:
An objection can't be issued against an argument retroactively from the point of reference of that argument. This form of objection – invented by the pre socratic philosopher
228:"La cosmologie parménidienne de Parménide," in R. Brague and J.-F. Courtine (eds.), Herméneutique et ontologie: Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Aubenque
124:
210:
183:
88:
is not an objection to an argument based not on any of its stated premises, but rather on the relationship between a
109:
152:
241:
98:
31:
274:
269:
206:
179:
51:
200:
173:
118:
62:
55:
263:
27:
Reason arguing against a premise, argument, or conclusion; expression of disagreement
142:
54:. Definitions of objection vary in whether an objection is always an argument (or
94:
69:
17:
147:
47:
39:
89:
43:
153:
Paul Graham (programmer) § Graham's hierarchy of disagreement
128:
The same argument with the originally unstated co-premise included
123:
108:
114:
230:. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. pp. 17–53.
61:
An objection to an objection is sometimes known as a
58:) or may include other moves such as questioning.
113:An example of an inference objection based on
202:Strategic Thinking in Complex Problem Solving
8:
178:. Cambridge University Press. p. 59.
205:. Oxford University Press. p. 93.
164:
7:
25:
244:. New Scientist. 24 January 2004
72:– is commonly referred to as a
1:
291:
199:Arnaud Chevallier (2016).
175:Methods of Argumentation
172:Douglas Walton (2013).
129:
121:
74:retroactive refutation
127:
112:
226:Bollack, J. (1990).
99:begging the question
86:inference objection
80:Inference objection
242:"Doom in the sky?"
130:
122:
16:(Redirected from
282:
254:
253:
251:
249:
238:
232:
231:
223:
217:
216:
196:
190:
189:
169:
119:Stardust Mission
21:
290:
289:
285:
284:
283:
281:
280:
279:
260:
259:
258:
257:
247:
245:
240:
239:
235:
225:
224:
220:
213:
198:
197:
193:
186:
171:
170:
166:
161:
139:
107:
82:
56:counterargument
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
288:
286:
278:
277:
272:
262:
261:
256:
255:
233:
218:
212:978-0190463915
211:
191:
185:978-1107435193
184:
163:
162:
160:
157:
156:
155:
150:
145:
138:
135:
106:
103:
81:
78:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
287:
276:
273:
271:
268:
267:
265:
243:
237:
234:
229:
222:
219:
214:
208:
204:
203:
195:
192:
187:
181:
177:
176:
168:
165:
158:
154:
151:
149:
146:
144:
141:
140:
136:
134:
126:
120:
116:
111:
104:
102:
100:
96:
91:
87:
79:
77:
75:
71:
66:
64:
59:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
32:argumentation
19:
246:. Retrieved
236:
227:
221:
201:
194:
174:
167:
143:Argument map
131:
85:
83:
73:
67:
60:
38:is a reason
35:
29:
275:Statements
264:Categories
159:References
95:co-premise
70:Parmenides
52:conclusion
42:against a
18:Refutation
270:Arguments
36:objection
148:Defeater
137:See also
97:, as in
63:rebuttal
48:argument
248:Jul 24,
105:Example
90:premise
44:premise
40:arguing
209:
182:
50:, or
34:, an
30:In a
250:2020
207:ISBN
180:ISBN
115:NASA
117:'s
84:An
266::
76:.
65:.
46:,
252:.
215:.
188:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
