22:
73:
I agree, I've changed some of the section headers to be less PR-speak, but the article as a whole does read like an advertisement to me. It's largely written by a single editor, who engaged in large-scale copying from the Met website, and who has edited
57:
The article reads as if it is promoting the use of
Project Servator, like it is lifted straight from press releases from the City of London Police and others. I don't think it presents a neutral view of the topic as of
29:
102:
43:
83:
63:
39:
79:
59:
96:
87:
67:
47:
15:
28:
This article has not yet been rated on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
75:
8:
76:remarkably little to do with anything else
21:
19:
7:
38:Project Servator draft article talk
14:
20:
1:
48:01:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
119:
88:13:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
68:14:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
53:NPOV dispute: May 2019
103:Unassessed articles
30:content assessment
36:
35:
110:
25:
24:
23:
16:
118:
117:
113:
112:
111:
109:
108:
107:
93:
92:
55:
12:
11:
5:
116:
114:
106:
105:
95:
94:
91:
90:
54:
51:
34:
33:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
115:
104:
101:
100:
98:
89:
85:
81:
77:
72:
71:
70:
69:
65:
61:
52:
50:
49:
45:
41:
31:
27:
18:
17:
56:
40:Steve virgin
37:
80:DuncanHill
60:Eilidhmax
97:Category
32:scale.
84:talk
64:talk
58:yet.
44:talk
78:.
99::
86:)
66:)
46:)
82:(
62:(
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.