67:
49:
77:
22:
147:
I don't know the first thing about this bill, but reading this Wiki page makes me think it is a clearly evil infringement on civil liberties. I suspect there's another side to the story. The article should present the objective facts. If I (or whomever) then decided that it truly is an infringement
176:
119:
125:
181:
171:
29:
157:
90:
54:
35:
94:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
148:
on civil liberties, that's fine. But, this article is essentially making the decision for the reader.
153:
165:
149:
66:
48:
76:
82:
72:
95:
15:
28:
This article has not yet been rated on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
124:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
43:
21:
19:
45:
7:
88:This article is within the scope of
98:and the subjects encompassed by it.
34:It is of interest to the following
14:
75:
65:
47:
20:
177:Unknown-importance law articles
104:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
1:
198:
158:16:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
126:project's importance scale
123:
60:
42:
182:WikiProject Law articles
107:Template:WikiProject Law
172:Unassessed law articles
30:content assessment
140:
139:
136:
135:
132:
131:
189:
112:
111:
108:
105:
102:
85:
80:
79:
69:
62:
61:
51:
44:
25:
24:
23:
16:
197:
196:
192:
191:
190:
188:
187:
186:
162:
161:
145:
109:
106:
103:
100:
99:
91:WikiProject Law
81:
74:
12:
11:
5:
195:
193:
185:
184:
179:
174:
164:
163:
144:
141:
138:
137:
134:
133:
130:
129:
122:
116:
115:
113:
87:
86:
70:
58:
57:
52:
40:
39:
33:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
194:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
169:
167:
160:
159:
155:
151:
142:
127:
121:
118:
117:
114:
97:
93:
92:
84:
78:
73:
71:
68:
64:
63:
59:
56:
53:
50:
46:
41:
37:
31:
27:
18:
17:
146:
110:law articles
89:
36:WikiProjects
96:legal field
166:Categories
83:Law portal
150:JoelWhy
32:scale.
154:talk
143:NPOV
120:???
101:Law
55:Law
168::
156:)
152:(
128:.
38::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
