89:
Foyle Meats Ltd's slaughtering business was declining. The company eliminated one production line in the slaughter hall, and 35 meat plant operatives were made redundant from the slaughter hall. The employees all had flexibility clauses, and they sometimes rotated departments to the boning or loading
104:
which had wrongly propagated the "contract test" view, which was wrong. A simple causation test was applied, based on the word "attributable" in the statute. Did diminishing demand for labor cause the dismissal?
109:
The argument before the
Employment Appeal Tribunal turned on whether the ‘contract test’ ought to be applied (i.e. did the company require fewer employees of the kind specified in Mr Pink’s contract)…
172:
90:
hall, etc. The dismissed employees claimed they were not redundant because the employer still needed workers under the same terms, just in different departments.
343:
261:
152:
402:
249:
392:
98:
Lord Irvine LC held that the operatives were redundant and that "the language of the is in my view simplicity itself". He referred to
310:
275:
193:
331:
182:
357:
145:
397:
299:
287:
216:
78:
138:
74:
205:
238:
100:
373:
386:
369:
70:
66:
42:
320:
168:
130:
134:
49:
38:
30:
25:
107:
345:Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding
146:
8:
263:Richmond Precision Engineering Ltd v Pearce
125:ICR 649, Megaw LJ, Roskill LJ and Browne LJ
153:
139:
131:
22:
18:United Kingdom court case about labour law
77:, specifically the interpretation of the
118:
7:
250:Hollister v National Farmers’ Union
332:Thomas Wragg & Sons Ltd v Wood
14:
311:Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union
276:Catamaran Cruisers Ltd v Williams
194:North Riding Garages v Butterwick
183:Lesney Products & Co v Nolan
403:1999 in United Kingdom case law
393:United Kingdom labour case law
358:Optical Express Ltd v Williams
1:
300:British Aerospace plc v Green
288:Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd
217:Safeway Stores plc v Burrell
419:
79:Employment Rights Act 1996
366:
354:
340:
328:
318:
307:
296:
284:
272:
258:
246:
235:
224:
213:
202:
190:
179:
166:
54:
228:Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
63:Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
26:Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
239:High Table Ltd v Horst
206:Murphy v Epsom College
111:
398:House of Lords cases
380:
379:
73:case, concerning
59:
58:
410:
374:unfair dismissal
346:
264:
161:Redundancy cases
155:
148:
141:
132:
126:
123:
23:
418:
417:
413:
412:
411:
409:
408:
407:
383:
382:
381:
376:
362:
350:
344:
336:
324:
314:
303:
292:
280:
268:
262:
254:
242:
231:
220:
209:
198:
186:
175:
162:
159:
129:
124:
120:
116:
96:
87:
19:
12:
11:
5:
416:
414:
406:
405:
400:
395:
385:
384:
378:
377:
367:
364:
363:
355:
352:
351:
341:
338:
337:
329:
326:
325:
319:
316:
315:
308:
305:
304:
297:
294:
293:
285:
282:
281:
273:
270:
269:
259:
256:
255:
247:
244:
243:
236:
233:
232:
225:
222:
221:
214:
211:
210:
203:
200:
199:
191:
188:
187:
180:
177:
176:
167:
164:
163:
160:
158:
157:
150:
143:
135:
128:
127:
117:
115:
112:
95:
92:
86:
83:
57:
56:
52:
51:
47:
46:
40:
36:
35:
34:House of Lords
32:
28:
27:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
415:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
388:
375:
371:
370:UK labour law
365:
360:
359:
353:
348:
347:
339:
334:
333:
327:
322:
317:
313:
312:
306:
302:
301:
295:
290:
289:
283:
278:
277:
271:
266:
265:
257:
252:
251:
245:
241:
240:
234:
230:
229:
223:
219:
218:
212:
208:
207:
201:
196:
195:
189:
185:
184:
178:
174:
170:
165:
156:
151:
149:
144:
142:
137:
136:
133:
122:
119:
113:
110:
106:
103:
102:
93:
91:
84:
82:
80:
76:
72:
71:UK labour law
68:
65:
64:
53:
48:
44:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
21:
16:
356:
342:
330:
309:
298:
286:
274:
260:
248:
237:
227:
226:
215:
204:
192:
181:
121:
108:
101:Nelson v BBC
99:
97:
88:
62:
61:
60:
20:
15:
173:TULRCA 1992
387:Categories
75:redundancy
55:Redundancy
45:, ICR 827
39:Citations
361:IRLR 936
349:IRLR 255
321:ERA 1996
279:IRLR 384
267:IRLR 179
171:ss and
169:ERA 1996
94:Judgment
50:Keywords
335:ICR 313
291:ICR 156
253:ICR 542
197:2 QB 56
67:UKHL 30
43:UKHL 30
323:s 141
114:Notes
85:Facts
69:is a
31:Court
372:and
368:see
389::
81:.
154:e
147:t
140:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.