211:
24:
194:
The
Tribunal held she was not too late because there was a common law trial period that could be longer than four weeks. The employers had breached the term of mutual trust and confidence by imposing on her the new contract which was unsuitable. Because her rejection was within a reasonable time, she
190:
section 138 with reservations and asked for confirmation, when she began the trial in the new post, that she could still get redundancy should the new post not work out. But the employers said nothing at the time.
186:
Ms
Williams claimed redundancy six weeks into a trial period as manager of an optical store, after the dental clinic which she had previously managed closed. She had agreed to a four-week trial under
287:
45:
458:
376:
267:
512:
517:
364:
507:
96:
68:
75:
425:
390:
308:
115:
446:
82:
297:
260:
49:
64:
414:
402:
331:
34:
139:
53:
38:
253:
175:
342:
320:
89:
353:
203:
Burton J held that the
Tribunal was wrong and the statutory trial period could not be ignored.
488:
195:
should be considered constructively dismissed under s 136(1)(c) and entitled to redundancy.
210:
501:
484:
171:
23:
435:
283:
187:
245:
249:
205:
17:
222:
153:
145:
135:
130:
460:Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding
261:
8:
378:Richmond Precision Engineering Ltd v Pearce
52:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
268:
254:
246:
127:
116:Learn how and when to remove this message
7:
50:adding citations to reliable sources
365:Hollister v National Farmers’ Union
447:Thomas Wragg & Sons Ltd v Wood
14:
426:Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union
391:Catamaran Cruisers Ltd v Williams
309:North Riding Garages v Butterwick
513:Employment Appeal Tribunal cases
298:Lesney Products & Co v Nolan
209:
65:"Optical Express Ltd v Williams"
22:
518:2007 in United Kingdom case law
508:United Kingdom labour case law
473:Optical Express Ltd v Williams
167:Optical Express Ltd v Williams
131:Optical Express Ltd v Williams
1:
415:British Aerospace plc v Green
403:Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd
332:Safeway Stores plc v Burrell
534:
140:Employment Appeal Tribunal
481:
469:
455:
443:
433:
422:
411:
399:
387:
373:
361:
350:
339:
328:
317:
305:
294:
281:
158:
343:Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
354:High Table Ltd v Horst
321:Murphy v Epsom College
46:improve this article
221:. You can help by
495:
494:
239:
238:
174:case, concerning
163:
162:
126:
125:
118:
100:
525:
489:unfair dismissal
461:
379:
276:Redundancy cases
270:
263:
256:
247:
234:
231:
213:
206:
128:
121:
114:
110:
107:
101:
99:
58:
26:
18:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
524:
523:
522:
498:
497:
496:
491:
477:
465:
459:
451:
439:
429:
418:
407:
395:
383:
377:
369:
357:
346:
335:
324:
313:
301:
290:
277:
274:
244:
235:
229:
226:
219:needs expansion
201:
184:
122:
111:
105:
102:
59:
57:
43:
27:
12:
11:
5:
531:
529:
521:
520:
515:
510:
500:
499:
493:
492:
482:
479:
478:
470:
467:
466:
456:
453:
452:
444:
441:
440:
434:
431:
430:
423:
420:
419:
412:
409:
408:
400:
397:
396:
388:
385:
384:
374:
371:
370:
362:
359:
358:
351:
348:
347:
340:
337:
336:
329:
326:
325:
318:
315:
314:
306:
303:
302:
295:
292:
291:
282:
279:
278:
275:
273:
272:
265:
258:
250:
243:
240:
237:
236:
216:
214:
200:
197:
183:
180:
170:IRLR 936 is a
161:
160:
156:
155:
151:
150:
147:
143:
142:
137:
133:
132:
124:
123:
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
530:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
505:
503:
490:
486:
485:UK labour law
480:
475:
474:
468:
463:
462:
454:
449:
448:
442:
437:
432:
428:
427:
421:
417:
416:
410:
405:
404:
398:
393:
392:
386:
381:
380:
372:
367:
366:
360:
356:
355:
349:
345:
344:
338:
334:
333:
327:
323:
322:
316:
311:
310:
304:
300:
299:
293:
289:
285:
280:
271:
266:
264:
259:
257:
252:
251:
248:
241:
233:
230:February 2015
224:
220:
217:This section
215:
212:
208:
207:
204:
198:
196:
192:
189:
181:
179:
177:
173:
172:UK labour law
169:
168:
157:
152:
148:
144:
141:
138:
134:
129:
120:
117:
109:
106:February 2015
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
81:
77:
74:
70:
67: –
66:
62:
61:Find sources:
55:
51:
47:
41:
40:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
472:
471:
457:
445:
424:
413:
401:
389:
375:
363:
352:
341:
330:
319:
307:
296:
227:
223:adding to it
218:
202:
193:
185:
166:
165:
164:
112:
103:
93:
86:
79:
72:
60:
44:Please help
32:
15:
288:TULRCA 1992
502:Categories
176:redundancy
159:Redundancy
76:newspapers
33:does not
476:IRLR 936
464:IRLR 255
436:ERA 1996
394:IRLR 384
382:IRLR 179
286:ss and
284:ERA 1996
199:Judgment
188:ERA 1996
154:Keywords
149:IRLR 936
146:Citation
450:ICR 313
406:ICR 156
368:ICR 542
312:2 QB 56
90:scholar
54:removed
39:sources
92:
85:
78:
71:
63:
438:s 141
242:Notes
182:Facts
136:Court
97:JSTOR
83:books
487:and
483:see
69:news
37:any
35:cite
225:.
48:by
504::
178:.
269:e
262:t
255:v
232:)
228:(
119:)
113:(
108:)
104:(
94:·
87:·
80:·
73:·
56:.
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
