Knowledge (XXG)

Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union

Source 📝

28: 96:
The High Court held that under EE(A)R 2006 r 3, the employer would have a defence to age discrimination because the collective agreement pursued a legitimate business aim, and in any case points for long service conferred a benefit on employees within regulation 32. Rolls-Royce argued that the judge
105:
Arden LJ, Wall LJ and Aikens LJ dismissed the appeal in the Court of Appeal. Although the length of service criterion could be indirect discrimination, it pursued a legitimate aim, especially where part of a collective agreement. Although the judge did not explicitly deal with proportionality,
89:, each year of service gave employees an extra point against selection for redundancy. Rolls-Royce, challenging the collective agreement that it had itself agreed to, asked the court whether this was compatible with the 168: 339: 398: 257: 148: 90: 403: 245: 388: 106:
objectively his decision was correct, and it was unnecessary to reach a view on regulation 32. But if pushed, they would have said he was right.
27: 38: 271: 189: 327: 178: 353: 141: 295: 283: 212: 134: 74: 97:
had failed to consider whether the provision was proportionate, and there was no ‘benefit’ under regulation 32.
223: 201: 234: 393: 369: 86: 382: 365: 70: 316: 164: 126: 130: 85:
In the collective agreements between Rolls-Royce and
52: 44: 34: 20: 341:Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding 142: 8: 259:Richmond Precision Engineering Ltd v Pearce 149: 135: 127: 91:Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 26: 17: 114: 7: 39:Court of Appeal of England and Wales 399:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 246:Hollister v National Farmers’ Union 328:Thomas Wragg & Sons Ltd v Wood 14: 307:Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union 272:Catamaran Cruisers Ltd v Williams 190:North Riding Garages v Butterwick 66:Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union 21:Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union 179:Lesney Products & Co v Nolan 404:2009 in United Kingdom case law 389:United Kingdom labour case law 354:Optical Express Ltd v Williams 1: 296:British Aerospace plc v Green 284:Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd 213:Safeway Stores plc v Burrell 420: 362: 350: 336: 324: 314: 303: 292: 280: 268: 254: 242: 231: 220: 209: 198: 186: 175: 162: 57: 25: 224:Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd 235:High Table Ltd v Horst 202:Murphy v Epsom College 69:EWCA Civ 387 is a 376: 375: 73:case, concerning 62: 61: 411: 370:unfair dismissal 342: 260: 157:Redundancy cases 151: 144: 137: 128: 122: 119: 30: 18: 419: 418: 414: 413: 412: 410: 409: 408: 379: 378: 377: 372: 358: 346: 340: 332: 320: 310: 299: 288: 276: 264: 258: 250: 238: 227: 216: 205: 194: 182: 171: 158: 155: 125: 120: 116: 112: 103: 83: 12: 11: 5: 417: 415: 407: 406: 401: 396: 391: 381: 380: 374: 373: 363: 360: 359: 351: 348: 347: 337: 334: 333: 325: 322: 321: 315: 312: 311: 304: 301: 300: 293: 290: 289: 281: 278: 277: 269: 266: 265: 255: 252: 251: 243: 240: 239: 232: 229: 228: 221: 218: 217: 210: 207: 206: 199: 196: 195: 187: 184: 183: 176: 173: 172: 163: 160: 159: 156: 154: 153: 146: 139: 131: 124: 123: 121:EWHC 2420 (QB) 113: 111: 108: 102: 99: 82: 79: 60: 59: 55: 54: 50: 49: 46: 42: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 416: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 386: 384: 371: 367: 366:UK labour law 361: 356: 355: 349: 344: 343: 335: 330: 329: 323: 318: 313: 309: 308: 302: 298: 297: 291: 286: 285: 279: 274: 273: 267: 262: 261: 253: 248: 247: 241: 237: 236: 230: 226: 225: 219: 215: 214: 208: 204: 203: 197: 192: 191: 185: 181: 180: 174: 170: 166: 161: 152: 147: 145: 140: 138: 133: 132: 129: 118: 115: 109: 107: 100: 98: 94: 92: 88: 80: 78: 76: 72: 71:UK labour law 68: 67: 56: 51: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 352: 338: 326: 306: 305: 294: 282: 270: 256: 244: 233: 222: 211: 200: 188: 177: 117: 104: 95: 84: 65: 64: 63: 48:EWCA Civ 387 15: 394:Rolls-Royce 169:TULRCA 1992 383:Categories 75:redundancy 58:Redundancy 357:IRLR 936 345:IRLR 255 317:ERA 1996 275:IRLR 384 263:IRLR 179 167:ss and 165:ERA 1996 101:Judgment 53:Keywords 45:Citation 331:ICR 313 287:ICR 156 249:ICR 542 193:2 QB 56 319:s 141 110:Notes 87:Unite 81:Facts 35:Court 368:and 364:see 385:: 93:. 77:. 150:e 143:t 136:v

Index


Court of Appeal of England and Wales
UK labour law
redundancy
Unite
Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006
v
t
e
ERA 1996
TULRCA 1992
Lesney Products & Co v Nolan
North Riding Garages v Butterwick
Murphy v Epsom College
Safeway Stores plc v Burrell
Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
High Table Ltd v Horst
Hollister v National Farmers’ Union
Richmond Precision Engineering Ltd v Pearce
Catamaran Cruisers Ltd v Williams
Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd
British Aerospace plc v Green
Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union
ERA 1996
Thomas Wragg & Sons Ltd v Wood
Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding
Optical Express Ltd v Williams
UK labour law
unfair dismissal
Categories

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.