Knowledge (XXG)

Osman v United Kingdom

Source 📝

315: 321: 380: 59:
resident in London. The first applicant, Mulkiye Osman, was the widow of Ali Osman, who was shot dead by Paul Paget-Lewis on 7 March 1988. The second applicant, Ahmet Osman, was her son, born in 1972. He was a former pupil of Paget-Lewis at Homerton House School, and was wounded in the shooting which
67:
that Paget-Lewis represented a serious threat to the physical safety of Ahmet Osman and his family. The applicants argued that the police had been given information which should have made it clear that the individual posed a danger.
455: 299: 263: 215: 202: 450: 445: 440: 180: 465: 82: 421: 90:. On appeal to Strasbourg, the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights was that such blanket immunity would be a breach of article 6 of the 364: 63:
The applicants' complaints were directed at the failure of the authorities to appreciate and act on what they claim was a series of clear
91: 470: 130: 94:, but that there was no breach of articles 2 and 8. For the first time, the court applied a doctrinal principle today know as the 460: 169: 36: 102:
under the Convention in such a way that they do "not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities".
414: 230:"Fundamental Rights and Limited Possibilities: The Proviso of the Possible in European Fundamental Rights Doctrine" 357: 330: 282: 475: 407: 350: 99: 234: 286: 391: 334: 314: 243: 87: 175: 56: 134: 44: 155: 434: 86:
where it was ruled that the police owed no duty of care to one of the victims of the
111: 77: 64: 40: 379: 278: 17: 387: 248: 229: 456:
European Court of Human Rights cases involving the United Kingdom
395: 338: 76:
The English courts all agreed that the police owed no
451:
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
446:
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
441:
Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights
168: 415: 358: 8: 170:"Police 'failed to act on killer's warning'" 98:. The aim of this test is to interpret the 422: 408: 365: 351: 333:, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a 247: 80:to the applicants, confirming the law in 47:. Judgment was given on 28 October 1998. 83:Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire 122: 27:European Court of Human Rights decision 7: 376: 374: 310: 308: 264:CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 216:CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 203:CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 92:European Convention on Human Rights 394:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 337:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 25: 133:. CK Legal Centre. Archived from 378: 319: 313: 262:European Court of Human Rights, 214:European Court of Human Rights, 201:European Court of Human Rights, 183:from the original on 24 May 2022 60:led to the death of his father. 466:1998 in United Kingdom case law 167:Kirby, Terry (7 October 1992). 37:European Court of Human Rights 1: 131:"ViewCaseStudy.asp?CaseID=42" 266:, 28 October 1998, para 116 492: 373: 307: 205:, 28 October 1998, para 10 331:law in the United Kingdom 329:This article relating to 471:United Kingdom law stubs 228:Munaretto, Lino (2024). 35:was a case heard by the 32:Osman v United Kingdom 461:English tort case law 249:10.1017/glj.2023.114 100:positive obligations 55:The applicants were 235:German Law Journal 403: 402: 346: 345: 287:Modern Law Review 283:Unravelling Osman 218:, 28 October 1998 137:on 10 August 2019 16:(Redirected from 483: 424: 417: 410: 382: 375: 367: 360: 353: 325: 324: 323: 322: 317: 309: 267: 260: 254: 253: 251: 225: 219: 212: 206: 199: 193: 192: 190: 188: 172: 164: 158: 153: 147: 146: 144: 142: 127: 88:Yorkshire Ripper 57:British citizens 21: 491: 490: 486: 485: 484: 482: 481: 480: 431: 430: 429: 428: 372: 371: 320: 318: 312: 305: 296: 285:' (2001) 64(2) 275: 270: 261: 257: 227: 226: 222: 213: 209: 200: 196: 186: 184: 176:The Independent 166: 165: 161: 154: 150: 140: 138: 129: 128: 124: 120: 108: 74: 53: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 489: 487: 479: 478: 476:Case law stubs 473: 468: 463: 458: 453: 448: 443: 433: 432: 427: 426: 419: 412: 404: 401: 400: 383: 370: 369: 362: 355: 347: 344: 343: 326: 303: 302: 295: 294:External links 292: 291: 290: 274: 271: 269: 268: 255: 242:(2): 185–209. 220: 207: 194: 159: 148: 121: 119: 116: 115: 114: 107: 104: 73: 70: 52: 49: 45:United Kingdom 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 488: 477: 474: 472: 469: 467: 464: 462: 459: 457: 454: 452: 449: 447: 444: 442: 439: 438: 436: 425: 420: 418: 413: 411: 406: 405: 399: 397: 393: 390:article is a 389: 384: 381: 377: 368: 363: 361: 356: 354: 349: 348: 342: 340: 336: 332: 327: 316: 311: 306: 301: 300:ECHR judgment 298: 297: 293: 288: 284: 280: 277: 276: 272: 265: 259: 256: 250: 245: 241: 237: 236: 231: 224: 221: 217: 211: 208: 204: 198: 195: 182: 178: 177: 171: 163: 160: 157: 152: 149: 136: 132: 126: 123: 117: 113: 110: 109: 105: 103: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 79: 71: 69: 66: 65:warning signs 61: 58: 50: 48: 46: 42: 38: 34: 33: 19: 396:expanding it 385: 339:expanding it 328: 304: 258: 239: 233: 223: 210: 197: 185:. Retrieved 174: 162: 151: 139:. Retrieved 135:the original 125: 112:Death threat 95: 81: 78:duty of care 75: 62: 54: 41:human rights 31: 30: 29: 43:law in the 435:Categories 273:References 187:5 February 179:. London. 96:Osman test 18:Osman v UK 279:CA Gearty 141:10 August 388:case law 181:Archived 156:ECRR 101 106:See also 72:Judgment 386:This 118:Notes 51:Facts 392:stub 335:stub 189:2020 143:2019 289:159 281:, ' 244:doi 39:on 437:: 240:25 238:. 232:. 173:. 423:e 416:t 409:v 398:. 366:e 359:t 352:v 341:. 252:. 246:: 191:. 145:. 20:)

Index

Osman v UK
European Court of Human Rights
human rights
United Kingdom
British citizens
warning signs
duty of care
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Yorkshire Ripper
European Convention on Human Rights
positive obligations
Death threat
"ViewCaseStudy.asp?CaseID=42"
the original
ECRR 101
"Police 'failed to act on killer's warning'"
The Independent
Archived
CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
"Fundamental Rights and Limited Possibilities: The Proviso of the Possible in European Fundamental Rights Doctrine"
German Law Journal
doi
10.1017/glj.2023.114
CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CA Gearty
Unravelling Osman
Modern Law Review
ECHR judgment
Flag of United Kingdom

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.