Knowledge (XXG)

Battle of Camp Hill

Source 📝

1115: 1094:, near where "The Mermaid" public house stood, by the road to Warwick). Here the further approach to Birmingham was barred by some of the slight earthworks which had been thrown up. The men of Birmingham possessed a very inadequate force to defend these works. In the town a small company of foot soldiers under Captain Richard Greaves was stationed. The Lichfield garrison had sent in a troop of horse, but their united strength barely exceeded 200 men. Rupert did not believe that his large body would be opposed by so inferior a force. He therefore sent his Quarter-Master forward to take up his lodgings, and to 1123:
civilians—the ministers of Birmingham, and the leading men of the town; but the "middle and inferior sort" of people, especially those that bore arms, insisted on resisting, so at last they all resolved to fight. Finding such was their case, Rupert gave the order to attack their defences at once. The defences were only a bank of earth, behind which the handful of musketeers was placed. As the Royalists advanced they received so heavy a fire that on reaching the works they could not stand up against it and had to retire. A second attempt met with a similar repulse.
222: 1127:
works, and from there charge the defenders. This was tried and proved successful. The defenders of the works could not stand being attacked front and rear, so abandoned the works and fled into the town. Rupert's troopers followed them. From the houses a desultory fire was kept up on the Royalist troopers as they advanced up the street. On this the troopers set fire to the houses from which they had been fired on, and the town was soon ablaze in several places. Pushing on the resistance became less; those who had fought fled and scattered.
1325:, whose mill was burnt by the Royalists for his refusal to sell swords to the King. He is said to have known not only how to make, but also how to use, a sword when made, and that he used his own sword with some effect on that 3 April, being one of those troopers of Captain Greaves who took part in that charge against the Royalists towards the close of the fight near Smethwick, in which the Earl of Denbigh was killed. The other account is signed " R. G.", possibly Richard Greaves himself. 959:
coming from. After the battle the Royalists spent the remainder of the day pillaging the town. The next morning before the main body of the Royalist force left town, many more houses were put to the torch. While pillaging and firing on an unfortified town in retaliation for resistance was common at that time in Continental Europe it was unusual in England and the Royalists’ conduct in Camp Hill provided the Parliamentarians a propaganda weapon which they used to disparage the Royalists.
1195: 1220:
or improper in it. If the owners of a house allowed firing from that house on the soldiers of the other side, the soldiers fired on were justified in destroying that house. Burning has always been one of the recognised means of destruction. Bund says that if Birmingham had been a Continental town nothing would ever have been heard of it; but because the Continental laws of war were applied to an English town the outcry was terrible.
1259:
memorials of his own scurrilous behaviour, in such loose expressions as modest ears cannot endure. The man was the principal governor and incendiary of the rude people of that place against their Sovereign. So full a qualification was a heightened measure of malice and disloyalty for the service that it weighed down the infamy of any other vicious behaviour.
229: 2227: 1004:, who had invented a means of smelting iron by the use of coal, and who claimed he could turn out "all sorts of bar iron fit for making of muskets, carbines, and iron for great bolts", both more cheaply, more speedily and more excellent than could be done in any other way. His method was now employed on the King's behalf. 1344:". The pamphlet claims that one or two houses were set on fire during the assault and once completed Rupert ordered the fires extinguished and that any other fires were started by troopers unknown, (against his explicit orders not to do so) after the main body of Cavaliers with Rupert in command left the town. 1219:
Bund also states that nothing that had taken place in the war produced more controversy than the way in which Rupert treated Birmingham, and that it was certainly harsh, but by the laws of war as understood on the Continent, in the school in which Rupert had been brought up, there was nothing illegal
1211:
John Willis-Bund states that the battle of Camp Hill was remarkable from the fact that an armed mob—they were nothing more—twice repulsed assaults of the best troops in the Royalist army, who attacked them in overwhelming numbers. That less than 300 men should keep some 1,800 at bay, even for a short
1098:
assure the townsmen if they behaved themselves peaceably they should not suffer for what was past. But they had not consciences good enough to believe him, and absolutely refused to let him quarter in the town, and from their little works, with mettle equal to their malice, discharged their shot upon
1307:
To which place on Monday Apr. 3, 1643, he marcht with 2000 horse and foot, 4 Drakes, and 2 Sakers; where after two houres fight (being twice beaten off by the Townsmen, in all but 140 Musqueteers) he entered, put divers to the Sword, and burnt about 80 Houses to ashes, suffering no man to carry away
1075:
was never made a garrison by direction of Parliament, being built in such a form as was hardly capable of being fortified, yet they had so great a desire to distinguish themselves from the King's good subjects, that they cast up little slight works at both ends of the town, and barricadoed the rest,
1032:
Historian John Willis-Bund, said that one characteristic of Charles were the small acts of vengeance in which he indulged and so among the orders given to Prince Rupert for the Lichfield expedition was that he should teach Birmingham a lesson for their disloyalty, especially for the insults they had
1494:
John Bund stated that the titles of these tracts show clearly what the grievances of the Parliament were against Rupert. His defeat of the men of Birmingham was resented, but still more so was his application of the rules of war to unfortified towns. For long after the Parliamentarians never ceased
1146:
Irritated by the resistance, and especially by Greaves' charge, Rupert's men were not inclined to be merciful. They rode round the town, leaping hedges and ditches to catch the townsmen; those they caught they slew. If the lists given are to be trusted, tradesmen, labourers, women were all cut down
1126:
Things were getting serious; it would never do for Rupert to be defeated by the inhabitants of Birmingham. Yet there was little chance of carrying the works by a direct attack. Some of Rupert's men saw that it might be possible, by going across the fields, to ride round and get into the rear of the
958:
The Parliamentarians put up a surprisingly stout resistance and, according to the Royalists, shot at them from houses as the small Parliamentary force was driven out of town and back towards Lichfield. To suppress the musket fire, the Royalists torched the houses where they thought the shooting was
1223:
Trevor Royal writing in 2004 draws the same conclusions as Bund, and says "By laying waste to the town and setting fire to many of its houses, Rupert's force provided parliament with a propaganda coup ... Charles rebuked Rupert for his men's behaviour — the prince had in fact done his best to curb
1212:
time, was an act that deserved to be recorded; that they, an untrained mob, should have checked the dreaded Royalist cavalry, was a still greater achievement. The Parliamentarians were delighted, and they had reason to be. Captain Greaves, probably a local man, a member of the family that lived at
1202:
Urban development has claimed the site of the battlefield and no physical trace of the battle remains to this day. The site of the Birmingham earthworks is now a roadway. Prince Rupert's headquarters on the afternoon of the battle, the "Old Ship" public-house according to local tradition, survived
1161:
A minister was slain in the street. Parliamentary supporters said he was mistaken for the minister of Birmingham, a vocal supporter of the Parliamentary cause, and was therefore murdered. The Royalists said that he told the troopers that "the King was a perjured, Papistical King, and that he would
1122:
It was about three in the afternoon that Rupert, to his surprise, found that "the sturdy sons of freedom", as the local historians Hutton and Guest called them, were determined to fight. This determination was opposed to the opinion of the Parliamentarians—not only of the military, but also of the
1173:
The historian John Willis-Bund states that nothing could show better the feelings of both parties, and it may or may not have been in accordance with the laws of war to have cut down a preacher making disloyal speeches, but to kill in cold blood a man who had in his pocket a journal with doubtful
988:
cannon. The numerous small forges which then existed on every brook in the north of the County turned out successive supplies of sword blades and pike heads. It is said that among the many causes of anger Charles had against Birmingham was that one of the best sword makers of the day, a man named
1291:
The organs of the Parliament extolled the Birmingham bravery and the Royalist cruelty—their wanton cruelty—in burning houses. The Royalist organs rejoiced at the just judgment which had befallen the disloyal town, and the punishment it had pleased the Lord to inflict on the inhabitants for their
1169:
and other prisons, some said for sixteen and others twenty-two years, and had only recently been released. On him were found a number of "idle and foolish papers", which the Parliament said proved him mad, the Royalists said proved him immoral. Like some other foolish people he kept a diary, and
1471:
Together with the Number of Prince Rupert's Forces, his considerable Persons slaine, or mortally wounded; their many abominable Carriages in and after the taking of the Town. The small Strength which Birmingham had to maintaine their defence, the Names of their men slaine; the number of houses
1258:
He was killed at the entering of the town, after he had not only refused quarter, but provoked the soldier by the most odious revilings and reproaches of the person and honour of the King that can be imagined, and renouncing all allegiance to him; in whose pockets were found several papers of
1142:
Greaves, having carried out his object, which was by his charge to give time for his foot to get away, and to prevent them being pursued, did not press his success further. He had himself in his charge received no less than five wounds. Reforming his men he faced about, and drew off towards
1273:
of the dismal inequality of the contention in which always some earl or person of great honour or fortune fell when, after a most signal victory over the other side, there was seldom lost a man of any known family, or of other reputation than of passion for the cause in which he
52: 1130:
However the fight was not over. Captain Richard Greaves rallied his troop of horse, and drawing them up at the further (the Lichfield) end of the town, wheeled them round, and charged the scattered Royalists. Little expecting any resistance, the Royalists gave way.
1114: 1878: 1019:, a parliamentary stronghold. During the first year of the war the inhabitants of Birmingham apprehended all messengers and suspected persons; frequently attacked and reduced small parties of the Royalists, whom they sent prisoners to the fortified city of 1332: 1339:
It defends Rupert from the load of abuse showered on him for the excesses his men showed during and after the battle. It lays out the charges mentioned by Clarendon, and justifies the killing of the Priest as either bad, or mad and possibly
1300: 1352: 1875: 1320:
This pamphlet sets out the grievances of the Parliament against Rupert's action. The pamphlet contains two reports, one signed "R. P.", who, it is usually said, was Robert Porter, the sword-cutler mentioned in the
971:
in North-West Worcestershire and Birmingham was one of the few places in England that could produce the various military stores of which King Charles I was in dire need. As he had failed to secure the arsenals of
1170:
entered in it a number of matters that might well have been left out. "28th March. A comfortable kiss from Mrs. E., with some moistness. A cynamon kiss from a noted woman. A kiss from a girl of 14 years old".
1051:
Rupert's mission was, therefore, threefold. Punish Birmingham, garrison Lichfield, and clear the country as far as possible. To do this he was given a force of 1200 horse and dragoons and 600 or 700 foot.
1244:
took not that vengeance upon them they deserved, but made them expiate their transgressions by paying a less mulct than might have been expected from their wealth if their wickedness had been less.
280: 1135:, who was leading them, was severely wounded, knocked off his horse, and left for dead; he died five days later from his wounds, and his men fled back helter-skelter till they came near their own 1295:
Three accounts of the fight were published. The first of the three was published on 3 April 1643. It is a Parliamentary account, gives their idea of the affair. Its title and introduction is:
1311:
And of the Cavaliers were slaine divers chiefe Commanders, and men of great quality, amongst whom was the Earle of Denbigh, the Lord John Stewart: and as themselves report, the Lord Digby.
2289: 1522:
So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.
1569: 1269:
Clarendon adds that if it had not been for the death of the Earl of Denbigh he should not "have mentioned an action of so little moment as this of Birmingham". He deplores it, because
1475:
Published at the request of the Committee at Coventry, that the Kingdom may timely take notice what is generally to be expected if the Cavaliers insolencies be not speedily crushed.
1015:
on 17 October 1642, Charles passed through Birmingham. The townsfolk seized some of his carriages, containing the royal plate and furniture, which they conveyed for security to
2284: 273: 1459: 1418: 1393: 1854:–60 cites "A Letter written from Walshall by a worthy Gentleman to his Friend in Oxford, concerning Burmingham. Printed in the year 1643. A MS. note adds April 14th". 1090:
the road entered Worcestershire, then proceeding northwards along one of the great main roads leading into Birmingham, now called the Stratford Road (it is joined at
2279: 242: 221: 1288:) was a strong Parliamentarian, and the death of the Earl meant the transfer of the family influence, which was considerable, from the King to the Parliament 1308:
his goods, or quench the fire, and making no difference between friend or foe; yet by God's providence the greatest losse fell on the malignants of the Town.
266: 1561:
The report confuses Lord Digby and the Earl of Denbigh. It was Denbigh that the Cavaliers acknowledged as killed. Lord John Stuart(1621–1644), was a son of
1511:
This was a term used by Independents to describe Charles I who they blamed for the bloodshed of the Civil War. It was taken from the Book of Numbers 35:33 (
1544:
For the Battle of Camp Hill, Willis-Bund cites Clarendon II pp. 180–181, However different publications use different pagination. II refers to Volume II.
2269: 2100: 2092: 2084: 2194:
An Historical and Descriptive Sketch of Birmingham: With Some Account of Its Environs, and Forty-four View of the Principal Public Buildings, &c
90: 24: 1548:
has the account on pages 233–234 in Book VII. The Clarendon publication in the references section of this article has an account on the pages
2210: 2174: 2147: 1566: 1341: 1132: 160: 1071:. Here he spent Easter Sunday, and on Easter Monday, 3 April, set out for Birmingham to execute the first part of his task. Clarendon says: 1744: 1562: 1285: 1182:
Rupert did not stay long in Birmingham. On Easter Tuesday, 4 April he marched from Birmingham to Walsall; on the Wednesday he reached
1034: 1937: 1674: 994: 756: 2060: 1355:; or, a more Exact and true Naration of Birmingham's Calamities, under the barbarous and inhumane Cruelties of P. Rupert's forces. 1224:
his men ... but the damage was done: Birmingham had paid the price for supporting parliament and being seen to profit from it".
682: 1136: 980:, he did not possess any supply of swords, pikes, guns, shot; all these Worcestershire could and did provide. Shot came from 493: 993:, who lived and made his blades in Worcestershire but sold them in Birmingham, refused at any price to supply swords for " 867: 733: 584: 400: 302: 1284:
The death of the Earl of Denbigh had a greater significance than many other earls because the Earl's son and successor (
990: 943:
garrison with the support of some of the local townsmen, approximately 300 men, attempted to stop a detachment of 1,400
1143:
Lichfield. He had saved his soldiers, but he left the unfortunate townsmen to the tender mercies of Rupert's troopers.
836: 741: 707: 617: 578: 314: 2294: 2274: 1162:
rather die than live under such a King", and on hearing this the enraged troopers obliged him by cutting him down.
948: 885: 856: 418: 364: 354: 2131:
The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England: Together with an Historical View of the Affairs of Ireland
895: 746: 702: 672: 528: 478: 473: 1479:
A righteous man regardeth the life of hit Beast, but the lender mereies of l/w wicked are cruell.—Prov. xii. 10.
1158:
Some of the troopers riding up to an inn, the ostler came out to take their horses, he was cut down and killed.
2264: 2236: 727: 722: 568: 80: 932: 928: 851: 816: 558: 533: 503: 483: 458: 428: 408: 359: 334: 290: 43: 20: 1166: 1165:
Parliamentary supporters alleged he had long been a lunatic, held "Jewish opinions", and had been held in
1087: 831: 677: 662: 543: 513: 453: 443: 423: 384: 379: 369: 339: 329: 247: 1237: 875: 841: 821: 796: 692: 657: 612: 602: 553: 548: 1194: 1186:. There he halted until Saturday, 8 April when he marched on to Lichfield and laid siege to the town. 1033:
put on the King in October, 1642, before the Battle of Edgehill, when they plundered the Royal Coach.
1347:
The third, dated 1 May 1643, is a strong Parliamentary production, possibly the most savage of all:-
900: 880: 846: 697: 523: 468: 309: 1472:
burned, and persons thereby destitute of habitation ; with divers other considerable passages.
1333:
A Letter written from Walshall by a worthy Gentleman to his Friend in Oxford, concerning Burmingham
1041:
A town of as great fame for hearty, wilful affected disloyalty to the King as any place in England.
632: 518: 508: 498: 394: 374: 349: 319: 1012: 977: 905: 801: 766: 751: 687: 667: 622: 597: 592: 488: 463: 438: 389: 344: 1440: 1399: 1374: 2206: 2170: 2143: 2068: 2044: 2019: 1748: 1516: 1064: 1060: 811: 806: 771: 761: 717: 538: 324: 2036: 2003: 1851: 1719: 1595: 1549: 1527: 1213: 1025: 826: 791: 786: 712: 642: 607: 573: 448: 164: 1882: 1573: 1086:
So Rupert found it when, on 3 April, he marched there from Henley-in-Arden. After passing
1068: 1056: 890: 861: 776: 652: 647: 627: 563: 413: 51: 2240: 1545: 1076:
and voluntarily engaged themselves not to admit any intercourse with the King's forces.
1016: 2258: 2231: 1216:, who commanded the Parliament troops, might well be proud of his men's achievement. 968: 637: 156: 58:
A True Relation of Prince Ruperts Barbarous Cruelty against the Towne of Brumingham
1301:
True Relation of Prince Rvpert's Barbarous Cruelty against the Towne of Brumingham
1240:, show that there were strong feeling on the affair. Clarendon says that Rupert 981: 1008: 1001: 973: 952: 84: 56:
Prince Rupert shown attacking "Brimidgham", from the Parliamentarian pamphlet
105: 92: 1091: 940: 936: 781: 144: 2242:
The Civil War In Worcestershire, 1642-1646: And the Scotch Invasion Of 1651
1353:
Prince Rupert's Burning love of England, discovered in Birmingham's Flames
258: 1020: 944: 139: 1203:
into the nineteenth century and has been preserved only by photographs.
1183: 967:
At the start of the Civil War the area that would become known as the
985: 1838:, p. 86 citing: "A Letter from Walshall concerning Birmingham". 1565:, as he died a year later this report of his death was premature. ( 1193: 1113: 2230:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
1530: 1315:
London: Printed for John Wright in the Old-baily, April 12, 1643.
1236:, written during and after the Civil War and published after the 1118:
A weather vane reportedly shot by Prince Rupert during the battle
262: 2133:, vol. 3, foreword by William Warburton, University Press 1495:
to speak in the strongest terms of the Birmingham Butcheries.
1359:
Wherein is related how that famous and well affected Town of
246:
Camp Hill now located close to Birmingham City centre in the
1893: 1891: 951:
from passing through the unfortified parliamentary town of
927:, took place on Easter Monday, 3 April 1643, in and around 1055:
On Wednesday, 29 March 1643, Rupert left Oxford, reaching
1007:
During the first campaign of the war, while marching from
2185:
The history, topography and directory of Warwickshire:...
1610:, pp. 43, 46 from contemporary parliamentary sources 1335:. (Printed in the year 1643. A MS. note adds April 14th.) 1328:
The second, date 14 April 1643, is a Royalist pamphlet:
1198:
The Ship Inn in the mid-1860s. It was demolished in 1867.
1000:
However, the Royalists had among their adherents Colonel
1139:, and they formed up in the rear of the Royalist lines. 2158:
The History of Birmingham: With Considerable Additions
1155:
Two cases were commented on shortly after the battle:
2129:
Edward Hyde Clarendon, 1st Earl of Clarendon (1849),
1634:, p. 58, from contemporary parliamentary sources 1622:, p. 56, from contemporary parliamentary sources 1443: 1402: 1377: 1254:
Clarendon then justifies the death of the clergyman:
1962: 1960: 1958: 2167:
Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638-1660
1465:And most cruelly fired in cold blood the next day. 1453: 1412: 1387: 1983: 1981: 1979: 1977: 1975: 1819: 1817: 1815: 1813: 1811: 1809: 1807: 1770: 1768: 1766: 1642: 1640: 1446: 1405: 1380: 1174:entries was a disgrace even to those wild times. 1687: 1685: 1683: 2290:Massacres during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1520: 1330: 1297: 1271: 1256: 1242: 1096: 1073: 1039: 36: 2245:, Birmingham: The Midland Educational Company 1933: 274: 8: 1067:, and on Saturday, 1 April (Easter Eve), at 2112: 2080: 2056: 2032: 1999: 1987: 1966: 1949: 1909: 1897: 1863: 1847: 1835: 1823: 1798: 1786: 1774: 1731: 1703: 1691: 1670: 1658: 1646: 1631: 1619: 1607: 1591: 1706:, p. 84 citing: Clarendon, II, p. 180 1598:, from a contemporary parliamentary source 1023:(the origin of the proverbial expression, 281: 267: 259: 33: 2285:17th century in Birmingham, West Midlands 1715: 1445: 1444: 1442: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1379: 1378: 1376: 2201:Zuckerman, Joan; Eley, Geoffrey (1979), 2140:Henry Ireton and the English Revolution' 2031:The text of the letters is available in 1969:, p. 87 citing: Clarendon II., 181. 1952:, p. 86 citing: Clarendon II., 181. 1011:to engage parliamentarian forces at the 1584: 1504: 1063:, on Friday, 31 March (Good Friday) at 2156:Hutton, William; Guest, James (1836), 1866:, pp. 90–91 citing Webb, 1., 305. 1789:, p. 85 citing:Clarendon, II, 181 165: 25:Battle of Camp Hill (Harry Turtledove) 2088: 1921: 16:Battle in the first English Civil War 7: 2280:History of Birmingham, West Midlands 2096: 2064: 2040: 2015: 1552:noting that it is in Book VII 31–33. 1512: 1059:that evening. On Thursday he was at 1801:, p. 85 citing: Hutton, p. 48. 14: 2270:Battles of the English Civil Wars 1435:Notoriously robbed and plundered, 228: 2225: 1563:Esmé Stewart, 3rd Duke of Lennox 935:. In the skirmish, a company of 227: 220: 50: 1037:adds that Birmingham was then: 1: 1567:Lords John and Bernard Stuart 199: 23:battle of the same name, see 1322: 997:", or any of his adherents. 2196:, Beilby, Knott, and Beilby 1876:The Old Ship Inn, Camp Hill 1232:Clarendon's account in his 2311: 1745:"Mermaid Inn Warwick Road" 1342:One of the new Enthusiasts 18: 2237:Willis-Bund, John William 2160:(6th ed.), G. Berger 1934:Zuckerman & Eley 1979 1454:{\displaystyle {\Big \}}} 1437: 1421: 1413:{\displaystyle {\Big \}}} 1396: 1388:{\displaystyle {\Big \}}} 1371: 300: 215: 193: 176: 150: 133: 63: 49: 41: 2205:, Taylor & Francis, 1234:History of the Civil War 1151:Killing of two civilians 2203:The Birmingham heritage 2165:Royal, Trevor (2006) , 2081:Hutton & Guest 1836 2057:Hutton & Guest 1836 2033:Hutton & Guest 1836 2000:Hutton & Guest 1836 1848:Hutton & Guest 1836 1671:Hutton & Guest 1836 1632:Hutton & Guest 1836 1620:Hutton & Guest 1836 1608:Hutton & Guest 1836 1592:Hutton & Guest 1836 933:First English Civil War 929:Camp Hill, Warwickshire 292:First English Civil War 172:Captain Richard Greaves 44:First English Civil War 21:Southern Victory Series 2192:Yates, George (1830), 2183:West, William (1830), 1881:5 October 2011 at the 1535: 1492: 1455: 1414: 1389: 1337: 1318: 1282: 1267: 1252: 1199: 1119: 1107: 1084: 1049: 211:More than 340 homeless 151:Commanders and leaders 1456: 1415: 1390: 1349: 1197: 1117: 947:under the command of 683:Gunnislake New Bridge 194:Casualties and losses 2138:Farr, David (2006), 1441: 1400: 1375: 1228:Contemporary reports 1026:send him to Coventry 925:Battle of Birmingham 923:, also known as the 243:class=notpageimage| 1430:Insolently invaded 1369:Unworthily opposed, 921:Battle of Camp Hill 102: /  37:Battle of Camp Hill 1572:7 May 2009 at the 1451: 1410: 1385: 1292:rebellious views. 1200: 1147:indiscriminately. 1120: 1013:Battle of Edgehill 757:Scarborough Castle 559:2nd Wardour Castle 459:1st Wardour Castle 19:For the fictional 2295:Massacres in 1643 2275:Conflicts in 1643 2212:978-0-85664-875-5 2176:978-0-349-11564-1 2149:978-1-84383-235-5 2142:, Boydell Press, 1912:, pp. 87–88. 1885:, 14 January 2009 1751:on 16 August 2011 1576:National Gallery) 1469: 1468: 1425:Rupert's Forces. 1190:Battlefield today 1065:Stratford-on-Avon 1061:Shipston-on-Stour 995:that man of blood 914: 913: 837:Sherburn in Elmet 708:Montgomery Castle 618:Stourbridge Heath 257: 256: 129: 128: 2302: 2246: 2229: 2228: 2215: 2197: 2188: 2179: 2161: 2152: 2134: 2116: 2113:Willis-Bund 1905 2110: 2104: 2078: 2072: 2054: 2048: 2029: 2023: 2013: 2007: 1997: 1991: 1988:Willis-Bund 1905 1985: 1970: 1967:Willis-Bund 1905 1964: 1953: 1950:Willis-Bund 1905 1947: 1941: 1931: 1925: 1919: 1913: 1910:Willis-Bund 1905 1907: 1901: 1898:Willis-Bund 1905 1895: 1886: 1873: 1867: 1864:Willis-Bund 1905 1861: 1855: 1845: 1839: 1836:Willis-Bund 1905 1833: 1827: 1824:Willis-Bund 1905 1821: 1802: 1799:Willis-Bund 1905 1796: 1790: 1787:Willis-Bund 1905 1784: 1778: 1775:Willis-Bund 1905 1772: 1761: 1760: 1758: 1756: 1747:. Archived from 1741: 1735: 1734:, pp. 84–85 1732:Willis-Bund 1905 1729: 1723: 1713: 1707: 1704:Willis-Bund 1905 1701: 1695: 1692:Willis-Bund 1905 1689: 1678: 1668: 1662: 1659:Willis-Bund 1905 1656: 1650: 1647:Willis-Bund 1905 1644: 1635: 1629: 1623: 1617: 1611: 1605: 1599: 1589: 1577: 1559: 1553: 1546:This publication 1542: 1536: 1533: 1528:King James Bible 1509: 1488:Thomas Vnderhill 1460: 1458: 1457: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1419: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1409: 1408: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1366: 1365: 1280: 1265: 1250: 1105: 1082: 1047: 937:Parliamentarians 886:Stow-on-the-Wold 842:3rd Basing House 797:2nd Lathom House 747:High Ercall Hall 658:2nd Basing House 603:1st Lathom House 549:1st Basing House 295: 293: 283: 276: 269: 260: 231: 230: 224: 201: 167: 145:Parliamentarians 125:Royalist victory 117: 116: 114: 113: 112: 107: 106:52.471°N 1.879°W 103: 100: 99: 98: 95: 65: 64: 54: 34: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2265:1643 in England 2255: 2254: 2253: 2235: 2226: 2213: 2200: 2191: 2182: 2177: 2164: 2155: 2150: 2137: 2128: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2111: 2107: 2079: 2075: 2055: 2051: 2030: 2026: 2014: 2010: 1998: 1994: 1986: 1973: 1965: 1956: 1948: 1944: 1932: 1928: 1920: 1916: 1908: 1904: 1896: 1889: 1883:Wayback Machine 1874: 1870: 1862: 1858: 1846: 1842: 1834: 1830: 1822: 1805: 1797: 1793: 1785: 1781: 1773: 1764: 1754: 1752: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1730: 1726: 1714: 1710: 1702: 1698: 1690: 1681: 1669: 1665: 1657: 1653: 1645: 1638: 1630: 1626: 1618: 1614: 1606: 1602: 1590: 1586: 1581: 1580: 1574:Wayback Machine 1560: 1556: 1543: 1539: 1534: 1526: 1510: 1506: 1501: 1439: 1438: 1398: 1397: 1373: 1372: 1281: 1278: 1266: 1263: 1251: 1248: 1230: 1209: 1192: 1180: 1153: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1083: 1080: 1069:Henley-in-Arden 1057:Chipping Norton 1048: 1045: 965: 917: 916: 915: 910: 673:Cropredy Bridge 529:Aldbourne Chase 479:Chalgrove Field 296: 291: 289: 287: 253: 252: 251: 250: 245: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 210: 208: 206: 188: 183: 159: 110: 108: 104: 101: 96: 93: 91: 89: 88: 87: 55: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2308: 2306: 2298: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2257: 2256: 2252: 2251:External links 2249: 2248: 2247: 2217: 2216: 2211: 2198: 2189: 2187:, R. Wrightson 2180: 2175: 2162: 2153: 2148: 2135: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2105: 2073: 2049: 2024: 2008: 1992: 1971: 1954: 1942: 1926: 1924:, p. 226. 1914: 1902: 1887: 1868: 1856: 1840: 1828: 1803: 1791: 1779: 1762: 1736: 1724: 1716:Clarendon 1849 1708: 1696: 1679: 1663: 1651: 1649:, pp. 4–5 1636: 1624: 1612: 1600: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1554: 1537: 1524: 1503: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1486:: Printed for 1467: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1448: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1420: 1407: 1395: 1382: 1370: 1286:Basil Fielding 1276: 1261: 1246: 1229: 1226: 1208: 1205: 1191: 1188: 1179: 1176: 1152: 1149: 1111: 1108: 1101: 1078: 1043: 1017:Warwick Castle 964: 961: 912: 911: 909: 908: 903: 898: 893: 888: 883: 878: 865: 864: 859: 857:Shelford House 854: 849: 844: 839: 834: 829: 824: 819: 814: 809: 804: 799: 794: 789: 784: 779: 774: 769: 764: 759: 754: 749: 744: 731: 730: 725: 720: 715: 710: 705: 700: 695: 690: 685: 680: 675: 670: 665: 660: 655: 650: 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 620: 615: 610: 605: 600: 595: 582: 581: 579:2nd Middlewich 576: 571: 569:Bramber Bridge 566: 561: 556: 551: 546: 541: 536: 531: 526: 521: 516: 511: 506: 501: 496: 491: 486: 481: 476: 471: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 441: 436: 431: 426: 421: 419:1st Middlewich 416: 411: 398: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 365:Farnham Castle 362: 357: 352: 347: 342: 337: 332: 327: 322: 317: 315:Marshall's Elm 312: 301: 298: 297: 288: 286: 285: 278: 271: 263: 255: 254: 241: 240: 234: 233: 226: 225: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 212: 203: 196: 195: 191: 190: 185: 179: 178: 174: 173: 170: 153: 152: 148: 147: 142: 136: 135: 131: 130: 127: 126: 123: 119: 118: 111:52.471; -1.879 79: 77: 73: 72: 69: 61: 60: 47: 46: 39: 38: 32: 31: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2307: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2260: 2250: 2244: 2243: 2238: 2233: 2232:public domain 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2214: 2208: 2204: 2199: 2195: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2178: 2172: 2168: 2163: 2159: 2154: 2151: 2145: 2141: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2115:, p. 89. 2114: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2077: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2028: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2012: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1996: 1993: 1990:, p. 88. 1989: 1984: 1982: 1980: 1978: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1927: 1923: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1906: 1903: 1900:, p. 87. 1899: 1894: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1877: 1872: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1841: 1837: 1832: 1829: 1826:, p. 86. 1825: 1820: 1818: 1816: 1814: 1812: 1810: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1783: 1780: 1777:, p. 85. 1776: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1763: 1750: 1746: 1740: 1737: 1733: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1712: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1686: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1667: 1664: 1661:, p. 59. 1660: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1643: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1616: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1585: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1564: 1558: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1541: 1538: 1532: 1531:Numbers 35:33 1529: 1523: 1518: 1514: 1508: 1505: 1498: 1496: 1491: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1473: 1464: 1463: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1357: 1356: 1354: 1348: 1345: 1343: 1336: 1334: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1302: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1287: 1275: 1270: 1260: 1255: 1245: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1227: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1215: 1214:King's Norton 1206: 1204: 1196: 1189: 1187: 1185: 1177: 1175: 1171: 1168: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1150: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1138: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1116: 1109: 1100: 1095: 1093: 1089: 1077: 1072: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1053: 1042: 1038: 1036: 1030: 1028: 1027: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1003: 998: 996: 992: 991:Robert Porter 987: 983: 979: 975: 970: 969:Black Country 962: 960: 956: 954: 950: 949:Prince Rupert 946: 942: 938: 934: 931:, during the 930: 926: 922: 907: 906:2nd Worcester 904: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 889: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 852:Denbigh Green 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 813: 810: 808: 805: 803: 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 773: 770: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 709: 706: 704: 701: 699: 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 599: 596: 594: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 580: 577: 575: 572: 570: 567: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 510: 507: 505: 504:Roundway Down 502: 500: 497: 495: 494:Burton Bridge 492: 490: 487: 485: 484:Adwalton Moor 482: 480: 477: 475: 474:1st Worcester 472: 470: 467: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 435: 432: 430: 429:Seacroft Moor 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 409:Braddock Down 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 360:Turnham Green 358: 356: 353: 351: 348: 346: 343: 341: 338: 336: 335:Powick Bridge 333: 331: 328: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 307: 306: 305: 299: 294: 284: 279: 277: 272: 270: 265: 264: 261: 249: 248:West Midlands 244: 223: 214: 204: 198: 197: 192: 186: 181: 180: 175: 171: 168: 162: 158: 157:Prince Rupert 155: 154: 149: 146: 143: 141: 138: 137: 132: 124: 121: 120: 115: 86: 82: 78: 75: 74: 70: 67: 66: 62: 59: 53: 48: 45: 40: 35: 30: 26: 22: 2241: 2220:Attribution: 2219: 2218: 2202: 2193: 2184: 2166: 2157: 2139: 2130: 2108: 2076: 2052: 2027: 2011: 1995: 1945: 1929: 1917: 1905: 1871: 1859: 1843: 1831: 1794: 1782: 1753:. Retrieved 1749:the original 1739: 1727: 1711: 1699: 1694:, p. 84 1666: 1654: 1627: 1615: 1603: 1587: 1557: 1540: 1521: 1507: 1493: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1470: 1422: 1360: 1358: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1338: 1331: 1327: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1306: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1283: 1272: 1268: 1257: 1253: 1243: 1233: 1231: 1222: 1218: 1210: 1201: 1181: 1172: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1145: 1141: 1133:Lord Denbigh 1129: 1125: 1121: 1097: 1085: 1074: 1054: 1050: 1040: 1031: 1024: 1006: 999: 966: 957: 924: 920: 918: 896:2nd Aberdeen 868: 866: 832:Rowton Heath 734: 732: 703:1st Aberdeen 678:Marston Moor 663:Tipton Green 585: 583: 544:Olney Bridge 514:Gainsborough 489:2nd Bradford 454:Sourton Down 444:Ripple Field 433: 424:Hopton Heath 401: 399: 390:1st Bradford 385:Muster Green 370:Piercebridge 340:Kings Norton 330:Babylon Hill 303: 209:40 prisoners 161:Lord Denbigh 134:Belligerents 71:3 April 1643 57: 42:Part of the 29: 2067:, pp.  2043:, pp.  2035:, pp.  1936:, pp.  1850:, pp.  1238:Restoration 982:Stourbridge 876:Bovey Heath 827:2nd Chester 822:Philiphaugh 817:2nd Bristol 772:3rd Taunton 762:2nd Taunton 728:2nd Newbury 718:1st Taunton 713:1st Chester 693:Lostwithiel 613:Boldon Hill 554:Heptonstall 534:1st Newbury 509:1st Bristol 184:1,200 horse 109: / 2259:Categories 2169:, Abacus, 2123:References 2099:, p.  2091:, p.  2089:Yates 1830 2083:, p.  2059:, p.  2045:p. 154–158 2018:, p.  2002:, p.  1922:Royal 2006 1718:, p.  1673:, p.  1594:, p.  1515:, p.  1361:Birmingham 1279:Clarendon. 1264:Clarendon. 1249:Clarendon. 1207:Commentary 1104:Clarendon. 1081:Clarendon. 1046:Clarendon. 1009:Shrewsbury 1002:Dud Dudley 974:Portsmouth 953:Birmingham 901:Lagganmore 891:3rd Oxford 881:Torrington 847:Annan Moor 777:2nd Oxford 742:Inverlochy 698:Tippermuir 648:1st Oxford 633:Lyme Regis 519:Gloucester 395:Chichester 380:1st Exeter 320:Portsmouth 94:52°28′16″N 85:Birmingham 2097:West 1830 2065:West 1830 2041:West 1830 2016:West 1830 1513:Farr 2006 1423:By Prince 1178:Aftermath 1092:Sparkhill 1035:Clarendon 984:and from 945:Royalists 941:Lichfield 939:from the 782:Leicester 598:Newcastle 499:Lansdowne 469:Wakefield 439:Lichfield 434:Camp Hill 375:Tadcaster 355:Brentford 350:Aylesbury 235:Camp Hill 207:1-2 women 140:Royalists 97:1°52′44″W 81:Camp Hill 2239:(1905), 1879:Archived 1570:Archived 1525:—  1490:, 1643. 1277:—  1262:—  1247:—  1102:—  1079:—  1044:—  1021:Coventry 807:Hereford 802:Langport 767:Auldearn 752:Weymouth 723:Carlisle 688:Ormskirk 668:Oswestry 623:Cheriton 593:Nantwich 524:2nd Hull 464:Stratton 345:Edgehill 325:Plymouth 310:1st Hull 187:300 foot 182:200 foot 177:Strength 76:Location 2069:158–160 1323:Prelude 1184:Cannock 1137:colours 1088:Shirley 963:Prelude 812:Kilsyth 643:Lincoln 574:Arundel 539:Winceby 449:Reading 189:Militia 163: ( 2234:: 2209:  2173:  2146:  1755:19 May 1484:London 1167:Bedlam 1110:Battle 986:Dudley 862:Newark 792:Alford 787:Naseby 653:Bolton 608:Newark 205:15 men 122:Result 2039:-47; 1550:23–26 1499:Notes 1274:fell. 628:Selby 564:Alton 414:Leeds 2207:ISBN 2171:ISBN 2144:ISBN 1940:–36. 1757:2009 1363:was 1099:him. 978:Hull 976:and 919:The 869:1646 735:1645 638:York 586:1644 402:1643 304:1642 68:Date 2101:161 2020:154 1517:125 1029:). 166:DOW 2261:: 2095:; 2093:37 2087:; 2085:52 2063:; 2061:48 2037:42 2004:42 1974:^ 1957:^ 1938:34 1890:^ 1852:48 1806:^ 1765:^ 1720:24 1682:^ 1675:37 1639:^ 1596:47 1519:) 955:. 202:30 200:c. 83:, 2103:. 2071:. 2047:. 2022:. 2006:. 1759:. 1722:. 1677:. 1447:} 1406:} 1381:} 1340:" 1303:, 282:e 275:t 268:v 169:) 27:.

Index

Southern Victory Series
Battle of Camp Hill (Harry Turtledove)
First English Civil War

Camp Hill
Birmingham
52°28′16″N 1°52′44″W / 52.471°N 1.879°W / 52.471; -1.879
Royalists
Parliamentarians
Prince Rupert
Lord Denbigh
DOW
Camp Hill is located in West Midlands county
class=notpageimage|
West Midlands
v
t
e
First English Civil War
1642
1st Hull
Marshall's Elm
Portsmouth
Plymouth
Babylon Hill
Powick Bridge
Kings Norton
Edgehill
Aylesbury
Brentford

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.