Knowledge (XXG)

Beaver v R

Source 📝

29: 266: 235:
The Court held that Beaver did not know the character of the substance, and he was acquitted of possession. However, he did represent the substance as a narcotic and therefore was convicted on the charge of selling a narcotic.
227:
of an element of an offence must be proven to secure a conviction. It has been established that provisions in the Drug Act are criminal law, and that any offence that allows a punishment of prison requires proof of
202:
Louis Beaver and his brother Max Beaver were arrested selling heroin to an undercover RCMP officer and charged with possession and sale of an illegal narcotic under the
223:
The Court held that knowledge was required. Cartwright J., writing for the majority stated that it is a fundamental principle of criminal law that the
190:
requirement in criminal law to prove "possession". The Court held that an offence based on possession, such as possession of a narcotic, requires the
281: 212:
At trial, the judge instructed the jury by telling them that if they find that they were in possession their actual knowledge was irrelevant.
291: 286: 209:
In defence, Louis claimed that he thought the package was milk sugar and that they were only trying to defraud the RCMP officer.
206:. Max was the one in actual physical possession of the drug but Louis was charged by association as he knew Max had the heroin. 215:
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether a conviction based on possession requires knowledge of the nature of the object.
74: 203: 171:
Kerwin C.J., and Taschereau, Kellock, and Nolan JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
246: 183: 34: 254: 131: 127: 28: 95:
A person must know that the substance they possess is a drug to be guilty of possession of that drug.
250: 143: 194:
to prove that the accused had subjective knowledge of the nature of the object in possession.
115: 139: 135: 108: 275: 60: 123: 267:
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Richards Court through Fauteux Court)
191: 119: 224: 187: 162: 154: 149: 99: 89: 81: 69: 59: 49: 42: 21: 8: 158:Cartwright J., joined by Rand and Locke J. 18: 54:Louis Beaver v. Her Majesty the Queen 7: 14: 27: 166:Fauteux J., joined by Abbott J. 73:Judgment for the Crown in the 1: 282:Supreme Court of Canada cases 182:is a leading decision of the 16:Supreme Court of Canada case 204:Opium and Narcotic Drug Act 75:Court of Appeal for Ontario 308: 292:Canadian criminal case law 287:1957 in Canadian case law 170: 104: 94: 26: 247:Supreme Court of Canada 184:Supreme Court of Canada 85:Appeal allowed in part. 45:Judgment: June 26, 1957 35:Supreme Court of Canada 132:John Robert Cartwright 43:Hearing: May 30, 1957 128:Charles Holland Locke 219:Opinion of the Court 144:Henry Grattan Nolan 179:Beaver v The Queen 22:Beaver v The Queen 175: 174: 116:Robert Taschereau 299: 113:Puisne Justices: 100:Court membership 31: 19: 307: 306: 302: 301: 300: 298: 297: 296: 272: 271: 263: 242: 221: 200: 111: 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 305: 303: 295: 294: 289: 284: 274: 273: 270: 269: 262: 259: 258: 257: 241: 240:External links 238: 220: 217: 199: 196: 173: 172: 168: 167: 164: 160: 159: 156: 152: 151: 147: 146: 140:Douglas Abbott 136:Gerald Fauteux 109:Patrick Kerwin 106:Chief Justice: 102: 101: 97: 96: 92: 91: 87: 86: 83: 79: 78: 71: 67: 66: 63: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 304: 293: 290: 288: 285: 283: 280: 279: 277: 268: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245:Full text of 244: 243: 239: 237: 233: 231: 226: 218: 216: 213: 210: 207: 205: 197: 195: 193: 189: 185: 181: 180: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150:Reasons given 148: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 114: 110: 107: 103: 98: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 70:Prior history 68: 64: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 249:decision at 234: 229: 222: 214: 211: 208: 201: 178: 177: 176: 112: 105: 53: 33: 124:Roy Kellock 276:Categories 253: and 198:Background 65:S.C.R. 531 120:Ivan Rand 61:Citations 261:See also 230:mens rea 225:Mens rea 188:mens rea 155:Majority 186:on the 163:Dissent 90:Holding 255:CanLII 82:Ruling 251:LexUM 192:Crown 232:. 278:: 142:, 138:, 134:, 130:, 126:, 122:, 118:, 77:.

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Patrick Kerwin
Robert Taschereau
Ivan Rand
Roy Kellock
Charles Holland Locke
John Robert Cartwright
Gerald Fauteux
Douglas Abbott
Henry Grattan Nolan
Supreme Court of Canada
mens rea
Crown
Opium and Narcotic Drug Act
Mens rea
Supreme Court of Canada
LexUM
CanLII
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Richards Court through Fauteux Court)
Categories
Supreme Court of Canada cases
1957 in Canadian case law
Canadian criminal case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.