Knowledge (XXG)

Boundary spanning

Source đź“ť

77:
promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the workplace, it has been argued that boundary spanners performing extra tasks because of their various identities (such as serving on a disproportionate number of committees, more mentoring duties, and other DEI-related work) should be recognized and compensated more for this additional effort. Extra work without recognition only serves to reinforce existing imbalances of power and underrepresentation of minority identities that boundary spanners can help improve.
89:. In spheres such as science communication and political outreach, boundary spanning individuals can engender trust in communities generally underserved and overlooked by those in power. They can be particularly effective communicators because of their competence in a certain area in addition to shared values, language, and priorities with the community they are serving, in a way that outgroup academic researchers and political elites cannot. 60:, all systems have a transference across their boundaries and this process is facilitated by the boundary spanner. As models of innovation developed, the role of the boundary spanner remained key in seeking out and bringing new ideas into the system or sub-system. Research has also found that boundary spanners tend to be 41:
The post-WWII years saw the burgeoning of the American corporation and a subsequent increased interest in improving the efficiency of these workplaces to maximize productivity. However, workers tend to become siloed in their various specialties, making cross-boundary communication and collaboration a
76:
is that the collection and codification of explicit knowledge into tacit knowledge is frequently held in silos within the organization. Boundary spanners are needed to move that knowledge around the organization in a process sometimes referred to as socialization. Also, with increased interest in
28:
of linking the organization's internal networks with external sources of information. While the term was coined by Tushman, the concept was being developed by social scientists from the late 1950s onwards. Most of the early work was conducted in large American corporations with well-established
46:
noted that "”one critical aspect of the innovation process is the ability of the innovating unit to gather information from and transmit information to several external domains” but that “communication across organizational boundaries is both inefficient and prone to bias and distortion”."
47:
Identifying and utilizing boundary spanning individuals in organizations ranging from corporations to academia to healthcare has become a point of focus for communications researchers as well as industrial-organizational (I/O) psychologists.
55:
The concept of a boundary spanning role has been popular throughout academic research into innovation systems with over 48,000 peer-reviewed articles referencing the term since 1958. With the exception of
113:
is now widely used to describe any situation where an individual crosses the boundaries of a social group to enable knowledge exchange, translate language, and share values among various groups.
423: 371:
Matous, P.; Wang, P. (2019). "External exposure, boundary-spanning, and opinion leadership in remote communities: A network experiment".
553: 280:
Christopherson, E.G.; Howell, E.L.; Scheufele, D.A.; Viswanath, K.; West, N.P. (2021). "How science philanthropy can build equity".
57: 85:
In business administration, boundary spanning is a key element in the acquisition capacity of a firm in Cohen's theory of
522: 30: 98: 73: 439:
Cohen, W; Levinthal, D (1990). "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation".
86: 464: 388: 228: 163: 135: 61: 43: 503: 456: 419: 415: 408: 338: 155: 21: 246:
Bergenholtz, C (2011). "Knowledge brokering: spanning technological and network boundaries".
495: 448: 380: 328: 320: 289: 255: 220: 147: 33:
laboratories. The term has since been used in relation to more general innovation networks.
410:
The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation
333: 308: 97:
At the individual level, this may be equated to the Resource Investigator role within
64:. The role of the boundary spanner is defined largely by where the boundary is drawn. 547: 483: 392: 523:"For years, I've been watching anti-elite fury build in Wisconsin. Then came Trump" 324: 384: 357: 259: 507: 499: 460: 159: 342: 468: 293: 232: 167: 452: 275: 273: 271: 269: 224: 151: 484:"Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension" 309:"Boundary spanning and health: invitation to a learning community" 211:
Allen, T J; Cohen, S (1969). "Information flow in R&D Labs".
25: 138:(1977). "Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process". 16:
In social science research and organizational psychology,
407: 414:. New York: Oxford University Press. p.  8: 406:Nonaka, Ikujiro; Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995). 20:is a term to describe individuals within an 332: 248:European Journal of Innovation Management 130: 128: 126: 122: 7: 42:challenge. Organizational theorist 307:Aungst, H.A.; et al. (2012). 72:One challenge within the field of 14: 282:Stanford Social Innovation Review 441:Administrative Science Quarterly 213:Administrative Science Quarterly 140:Administrative Science Quarterly 521:Cramer, K (16 November 2016). 356:Bhasin, Hitesh (9 July 2021). 325:10.1080/17571472.2012.11493346 1: 313:London J Prim Care (Abingdon) 488:Academy of Management Review 482:Zahra, S; George, G (2002). 385:10.1016/j.socnet.2018.08.002 93:Individual boundary spanners 181:March, J; Simon, H (1958). 570: 81:External boundary spanners 68:Internal boundary spanners 260:10.1108/14601061111104706 554:Research and development 500:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 200:. New York: McGraw-Hill. 24:who have, or adopt, the 198:Organizations in Action 99:Belbin's Team Inventory 196:Thompson, J D (1967). 74:knowledge management 358:"Boundary spanning" 87:absorptive capacity 294:10.48558/P4G8-QM77 185:. New York: Wiley. 136:Tushman, Michael L 425:978-0-19-509269-1 111:boundary spanning 51:Academic adoption 22:innovation system 18:boundary spanning 561: 538: 537: 535: 533: 518: 512: 511: 479: 473: 472: 436: 430: 429: 413: 403: 397: 396: 368: 362: 361: 353: 347: 346: 336: 304: 298: 297: 277: 264: 263: 243: 237: 236: 208: 202: 201: 193: 187: 186: 178: 172: 171: 132: 105:Broader adoption 569: 568: 564: 563: 562: 560: 559: 558: 544: 543: 542: 541: 531: 529: 520: 519: 515: 481: 480: 476: 453:10.2307/2393553 438: 437: 433: 426: 405: 404: 400: 373:Social Networks 370: 369: 365: 355: 354: 350: 306: 305: 301: 279: 278: 267: 245: 244: 240: 225:10.2307/2391357 210: 209: 205: 195: 194: 190: 180: 179: 175: 152:10.2307/2392402 134: 133: 124: 119: 107: 95: 83: 70: 62:opinion leaders 53: 39: 12: 11: 5: 567: 565: 557: 556: 546: 545: 540: 539: 513: 494:(2): 185–203. 474: 447:(1): 128–152. 431: 424: 398: 363: 348: 319:(2): 109–115. 299: 265: 238: 203: 188: 173: 146:(4): 587–605. 121: 120: 118: 115: 106: 103: 94: 91: 82: 79: 69: 66: 58:closed systems 52: 49: 38: 35: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 566: 555: 552: 551: 549: 528: 524: 517: 514: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 478: 475: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 435: 432: 427: 421: 417: 412: 411: 402: 399: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 367: 364: 359: 352: 349: 344: 340: 335: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 303: 300: 295: 291: 287: 283: 276: 274: 272: 270: 266: 261: 257: 253: 249: 242: 239: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 207: 204: 199: 192: 189: 184: 183:Organizations 177: 174: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 131: 129: 127: 123: 116: 114: 112: 104: 102: 100: 92: 90: 88: 80: 78: 75: 67: 65: 63: 59: 50: 48: 45: 36: 34: 32: 27: 23: 19: 530:. Retrieved 526: 516: 491: 487: 477: 444: 440: 434: 409: 401: 376: 372: 366: 351: 316: 312: 302: 288:(4): 48–55. 285: 281: 254:(1): 74–92. 251: 247: 241: 216: 212: 206: 197: 191: 182: 176: 143: 139: 110: 108: 96: 84: 71: 54: 40: 17: 15: 117:References 37:Background 508:0363-7425 461:0001-8392 379:: 10–22. 219:: 12–19. 160:0001-8392 109:The term 548:Category 393:53947635 343:26265946 532:3 April 469:2393553 334:4461106 233:2391357 168:2392402 44:Tushman 31:R&D 506:  467:  459:  422:  391:  341:  331:  231:  166:  158:  465:JSTOR 389:S2CID 229:JSTOR 164:JSTOR 534:2022 504:ISSN 457:ISSN 420:ISBN 339:PMID 156:ISSN 26:role 527:Vox 496:doi 449:doi 416:284 381:doi 329:PMC 321:doi 290:doi 256:doi 221:doi 148:doi 550:: 525:. 502:. 492:27 490:. 486:. 463:. 455:. 445:35 443:. 418:. 387:. 377:56 375:. 337:. 327:. 315:. 311:. 286:19 284:. 268:^ 252:14 250:. 227:. 217:14 215:. 162:. 154:. 144:22 142:. 125:^ 101:. 536:. 510:. 498:: 471:. 451:: 428:. 395:. 383:: 360:. 345:. 323:: 317:4 296:. 292:: 262:. 258:: 235:. 223:: 170:. 150::

Index

innovation system
role
R&D
Tushman
closed systems
opinion leaders
knowledge management
absorptive capacity
Belbin's Team Inventory



Tushman, Michael L
doi
10.2307/2392402
ISSN
0001-8392
JSTOR
2392402
doi
10.2307/2391357
JSTOR
2391357
doi
10.1108/14601061111104706




doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑