Knowledge (XXG)

CLidar

Source 📝

276:
receiving and outputting optics for the CLidar technique are bistatic (non-zero perpendicular distance between receiving and outputting optics). The signal strength is also much more constant than a lidar signal which can change by many orders of magnitude. It has very high altitude resolution in the lower atmosphere. The instrument components are typically simpler than those in the lidar also.
136: 22: 244:) camera. The camera is positioned hundreds of meters away from the (usually vertically-pointed) laser beam. The geometry of the CLidar is shown in the figure. It is important in the analysis that the optics, the wide-angle lens in this case, accurately maps equal angles onto an equal number of pixels throughout the 100 degree field-of-view. 275:
The CLidar technique has the advantage over the lidar technique of being able to measure all the way to the ground. This difference derives from their distinct geometric configurations, where in the lidar technique the receiving telescope and sourcing optics are monostatic (axially aligned) while the
259:
In the second figure, an image from the CCD camera is shown which is analyzed by adding up the individual pixels at each altitude. The camera was 122 meters from the vertically pointed, circularly-polarized laser beam. The beam is brighter near the ground due to near-ground aerosols. A bright spot
260:
due to a cloud can be seen near the top of the beam. The beam was positioned diagonally on the CCD array to use the space more effectively. A lighthouse and power pole can also be seen in the image.
169: 317: 279:
Disadvantages include poor altitude resolution in the upper atmosphere, difficulty designing optics that gathers substantial amounts of light, and a loss in noise rejection (
297:
Barnes, J. E., S. Bronner, R. Beck, and N. C. Parikh, Boundary layer scattering measurements with a CCD camera lidar, Applied Optics, 42, 2647-2652, 2003.
265: 46:
of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be
249: 155: 187: 117: 43: 39: 55: 165: 98: 70: 151: 146: 77: 32: 280: 241: 84: 51: 47: 229: 66: 300:
Barnes, John E., N. C. Parikh Sharma and Trevor B. Kaplan, Atmospheric aerosol profiling with a
240:
In this technique a very wide-angle lens images light scattered from a laser beam onto a CCD (
301: 322: 264: 225: 311: 91: 248: 213: 135: 205: 221: 217: 209: 38:
Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing
129: 15: 204:
is a scientific instrument used for measuring particulates (
304:
lidar system, Applied Optics, 46, 2922-2929, May, 2007.
161: 208:) in the lower atmosphere. CLidar stands for camera 150:, potentially preventing the article from being 8: 318:Meteorological instrumentation and equipment 170:reliable, independent, third-party sources 188:Learn how and when to remove this message 118:Learn how and when to remove this message 164:by replacing them with more appropriate 147:too closely associated with the subject 7: 271:Differences between Lidar and CLidar 14: 263: 247: 145:may rely excessively on sources 134: 20: 31:may not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 1: 33:general notability guideline 339: 40:reliable secondary sources 29:The topic of this article 281:signal-to-noise ratio 242:Charge-coupled device 212:, which in turn is a 230:atmospheric physics 224:". It is a form of 35: 198: 197: 190: 128: 127: 120: 102: 30: 330: 302:bistatic imaging 267: 251: 193: 186: 182: 179: 173: 138: 130: 123: 116: 112: 109: 103: 101: 60: 24: 23: 16: 338: 337: 333: 332: 331: 329: 328: 327: 308: 307: 294: 289: 273: 257: 238: 194: 183: 177: 174: 159: 139: 124: 113: 107: 104: 61: 59: 37: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 336: 334: 326: 325: 320: 310: 309: 306: 305: 298: 293: 290: 288: 285: 272: 269: 256: 253: 237: 234: 226:remote sensing 196: 195: 142: 140: 133: 126: 125: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 335: 324: 321: 319: 316: 315: 313: 303: 299: 296: 295: 291: 286: 284: 282: 277: 270: 268: 266: 261: 254: 252: 250: 245: 243: 235: 233: 231: 228:and used for 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 192: 189: 181: 171: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 148: 143:This article 141: 137: 132: 131: 122: 119: 111: 100: 97: 93: 90: 86: 83: 79: 76: 72: 69: –  68: 64: 63:Find sources: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 34: 27: 18: 17: 278: 274: 262: 258: 246: 239: 201: 199: 184: 175: 160:Please help 144: 114: 105: 95: 88: 81: 74: 62: 236:Description 214:portmanteau 44:independent 312:Categories 287:References 162:improve it 152:verifiable 78:newspapers 52:redirected 178:July 2016 166:citations 108:July 2016 42:that are 206:aerosols 67:"CLidar" 292:Sources 255:Example 220:" and " 156:neutral 92:scholar 56:deleted 202:CLidar 94:  87:  80:  73:  65:  48:merged 323:Lidar 222:radar 218:light 210:lidar 99:JSTOR 85:books 54:, or 232:. 216:of " 200:The 154:and 71:news 283:). 168:to 314:: 50:, 191:) 185:( 180:) 176:( 172:. 158:. 121:) 115:( 110:) 106:( 96:· 89:· 82:· 75:· 58:. 36:.

Index

general notability guideline
reliable secondary sources
independent
merged
redirected
deleted
"CLidar"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

too closely associated with the subject
verifiable
neutral
improve it
citations
reliable, independent, third-party sources
Learn how and when to remove this message
aerosols
lidar
portmanteau
light
radar
remote sensing
atmospheric physics
Charge-coupled device

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.