76:
Since
Directive 2000/78/EC, there has been an amendment to the Disability Discrimination Act so that a distinction between direct and indirect discrimination was introduced, and the language of the Act clarified. The entire Act has subsequently been replaced by the
67:
defence is always available. The comparator was someone who was not disabled and could do the work. There certainly was discrimination, but on the question of justification, no attention had been paid to the Code of
Practice.
221:
216:
226:
91:
211:
95:
169:
37:
107:
86:
196:
64:
52:). He was then dismissed when an orthopaedic doctor said he did not know when he would be able to start again.
117:
49:
175:
165:
78:
63:
said that the DDA drew no distinction between direct and indirect discrimination, and a
140:
205:
112:
33:
17:
60:
155:
179:
159:
161:
Disability and equality law in
Britain: the role of reasonable adjustment
48:
Mr Clark was injured at work (a frozen food warehouse in
164:. Oxford: Hart Publishing. pp. 131–136.
8:
222:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
94:expressly disapproved the decision (with
150:
148:
129:
7:
38:Disability Discrimination Act 1995
29:Clark v TDG Ltd (t/a Novacold Ltd)
25:
217:United Kingdom equality case law
108:UK employment discrimination law
227:1999 in United Kingdom case law
87:Lewisham LBC v Malcolm and EHRC
212:United Kingdom labour case law
1:
243:
141:[1999] EWCA 1091
197:TDG Novacold's address
118:Human Rights Act 1998
36:case concerning the
18:Clark v Novocold Ltd
171:978-1-84113-828-2
79:Equality Act 2010
16:(Redirected from
234:
184:
183:
152:
143:
134:
21:
242:
241:
237:
236:
235:
233:
232:
231:
202:
201:
193:
188:
187:
172:
154:
153:
146:
137:Clark v TDG Ltd
135:
131:
126:
104:
74:
58:
46:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
240:
238:
230:
229:
224:
219:
214:
204:
203:
200:
199:
192:
191:External links
189:
186:
185:
170:
144:
128:
127:
125:
122:
121:
120:
115:
110:
103:
100:
92:House of Lords
73:
70:
57:
54:
45:
42:
32:IRLR 318 is a
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
239:
228:
225:
223:
220:
218:
215:
213:
210:
209:
207:
198:
195:
194:
190:
181:
177:
173:
167:
163:
162:
157:
151:
149:
145:
142:
138:
133:
130:
123:
119:
116:
114:
113:UK labour law
111:
109:
106:
105:
101:
99:
98:dissenting).
97:
96:Baroness Hale
93:
89:
88:
82:
80:
71:
69:
66:
65:justification
62:
55:
53:
51:
43:
41:
39:
35:
34:UK labour law
31:
30:
19:
160:
156:Lawson, Anna
136:
132:
85:
83:
75:
72:Significance
59:
47:
28:
27:
26:
206:Categories
61:Mummery LJ
180:216663271
158:(2008).
102:See also
56:Judgment
178:
168:
90:, the
139:
124:Notes
44:Facts
176:OCLC
166:ISBN
50:Hull
84:In
208::
174:.
147:^
81:.
40:.
182:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.