Knowledge (XXG)

Collymore v Attorney General

Source 📝

320:
examination in the courts below as to whether there is in law any "right" to strike. The question does not really arise if the respondent's contention as above summarised is right: for if "freedom of association" does not of itself import freedom to bargain collectively and to do so effectively by means of a strike, it is immaterial whether strike action is or is not the exercise of a "right" or a "freedom" or the enjoyment of "an immunity." Since, however, the matter was exhaustively canvassed in the courts below, their Lordships may say that they are in substantial agreement with the analysis of the situation which emerged. It was agreed before their Lordships that trade union law in Trinidad and Tobago was the same as trade union law in Great Britain as at the date when the Trade Disputes Act, 1906, took effect. Neither before that date nor since has there been in Great Britain any express enactment by statute of any right to strike, although in certain quarters such an enactment is still advocated. At common law before the enactment of the
697: 66: 25: 168: 319:
The question thus posed is therefore simply a question of construction. But the arguments presented for the appellants, based on the assertion that the right to free collective bargaining and the right to strike are essential elements in freedom of association in trade unions, led to a prolonged
332:, combinations of workmen to improve their wages and conditions were certainly in peril if in combination they withheld their labour or threatened to do so: but (subject to certain esoteric questions arising out of the decision in 348:
AC 435 employees may lawfully withhold their labour in combination free from the restrictions and penalties which the common law formerly imposed. In this sense there is "freedom to strike."
575: 528: 480: 394: 429: 344: 325: 83: 38: 757: 738: 378: 130: 102: 598: 637: 307:
was ultra vires the constitution, which guaranteed freedom of association. The Act required no strikes pending binding arbitration.
221: 149: 109: 52: 44: 467: 551: 515: 443: 116: 455: 87: 98: 731: 503: 417: 565: 610: 371: 303:
Collymore and other trade union members for oil companies claimed that a new Industrial Stabilisation Act 1965 in
76: 762: 648: 767: 339: 329: 724: 123: 315:
The Privy Council advised that the Act did not breach the Constitution. Lord Donovan said the following:
364: 321: 304: 197: 342:) it is now well recognised that by reason of the statutes cited, as well as by decisions such as 178: 539: 708: 334: 247: 292: 682: 280: 257: 751: 633: 288: 284: 405: 696: 683:
Bailii.org British and Irish Legal Information Institute, accessed 17 March 2018
586: 491: 65: 356: 187: 167: 704: 622: 328:, and the amendment to section 3 thereof effected by section 1 of the 360: 161: 59: 18: 712: 192: 182: 263: 253: 243: 238: 90:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 431:Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co Ltd v Veitch 345:Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co Ltd v Veitch 317: 326:Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875 732: 469:Merkur Island Shipping Corporation v Laughton 372: 8: 553:British Airways Plc v Unite the Union (No 2) 53:Learn how and when to remove these messages 739: 725: 379: 365: 357: 235: 517:Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v ITWF 222:Learn how and when to remove this message 150:Learn how and when to remove this message 7: 693: 691: 338:AC 1129 and still unresolved by the 88:adding citations to reliable sources 599:Laval Un Partneri Ltd v Svenska BAF 758:United Kingdom enterprise case law 711:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 34:This article has multiple issues. 695: 504:UCL Hospitals NHS Trust v Unison 444:JT Stratford & Son v Lindley 166: 64: 23: 75:needs additional citations for 42:or discuss these issues on the 667:Supremacy of the constitution 566:Metrobus Ltd v Unite the Union 456:Torquay Hotel Co Ltd v Cousins 99:"Collymore v Attorney General" 1: 277:Collymore v Attorney General 239:Collymore v Attorney General 418:Taff Vale Railway Co v ASRS 784: 690: 611:Demir and Baykara v Turkey 649:United Kingdom labour law 630: 619: 607: 595: 583: 578:ss 20-22, 220-221 and 241 573: 562: 548: 536: 526: 512: 500: 488: 478: 464: 452: 440: 426: 414: 402: 392: 387:Collective action sources 268: 340:Trade Disputes Act 1965 330:Trade Disputes Act 1906 181:, as no other articles 16:1969 UK labour law case 350: 673:Separation of Powers 664:Ultra vires doctrin 409:(1853) 2 E&B 216 322:Trade Union Act 1871 84:improve this article 305:Trinidad and Tobago 200:for suggestions. 190:to this page from 720: 719: 644: 643: 291:, concerning the 283:is a case of the 273: 272: 232: 231: 224: 214: 213: 160: 159: 152: 134: 57: 775: 763:1969 in case law 741: 734: 727: 699: 692: 554: 518: 470: 432: 381: 374: 367: 358: 335:Rookes v Barnard 248:UK Privy Council 236: 227: 220: 209: 206: 195: 193:related articles 170: 162: 155: 148: 144: 141: 135: 133: 92: 68: 60: 49: 27: 26: 19: 783: 782: 778: 777: 776: 774: 773: 772: 748: 747: 746: 745: 688: 679: 662: 657: 645: 640: 626: 615: 603: 602:(2008) C-319/05 591: 590:(2008) C-438/05 579: 569: 558: 552: 544: 532: 522: 516: 508: 496: 484: 474: 468: 460: 448: 436: 430: 422: 410: 398: 388: 385: 355: 313: 301: 293:right to strike 228: 217: 216: 215: 210: 204: 201: 191: 188:introduce links 171: 156: 145: 139: 136: 93: 91: 81: 69: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 781: 779: 771: 770: 768:Case law stubs 765: 760: 750: 749: 744: 743: 736: 729: 721: 718: 717: 700: 686: 685: 678: 677:External links 675: 661: 658: 656: 653: 652: 651: 642: 641: 631: 628: 627: 620: 617: 616: 608: 605: 604: 596: 593: 592: 584: 581: 580: 574: 571: 570: 563: 560: 559: 549: 546: 545: 537: 534: 533: 527: 524: 523: 513: 510: 509: 501: 498: 497: 489: 486: 485: 479: 476: 475: 465: 462: 461: 453: 450: 449: 441: 438: 437: 427: 424: 423: 415: 412: 411: 403: 400: 399: 393: 390: 389: 386: 384: 383: 376: 369: 361: 354: 351: 312: 309: 300: 297: 271: 270: 266: 265: 261: 260: 255: 251: 250: 245: 241: 240: 230: 229: 212: 211: 198:Find link tool 174: 172: 165: 158: 157: 72: 70: 63: 58: 32: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 780: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 755: 753: 742: 737: 735: 730: 728: 723: 722: 716: 714: 710: 707:article is a 706: 701: 698: 694: 689: 684: 681: 680: 676: 674: 671: 668: 665: 659: 654: 650: 647: 646: 639: 635: 629: 625: 624: 618: 613: 612: 606: 601: 600: 594: 589: 588: 582: 577: 572: 568: 567: 561: 556: 555: 547: 542: 541: 535: 530: 525: 520: 519: 511: 506: 505: 499: 494: 493: 487: 482: 477: 472: 471: 463: 458: 457: 451: 446: 445: 439: 434: 433: 425: 420: 419: 413: 408: 407: 401: 396: 391: 382: 377: 375: 370: 368: 363: 362: 359: 352: 349: 347: 346: 341: 337: 336: 331: 327: 323: 316: 310: 308: 306: 298: 296: 294: 290: 289:UK labour law 287:relevant for 286: 285:Privy Council 282: 279: 278: 267: 262: 259: 256: 252: 249: 246: 242: 237: 234: 226: 223: 208: 199: 194: 189: 185: 184: 180: 175:This article 173: 169: 164: 163: 154: 151: 143: 132: 129: 125: 122: 118: 115: 111: 108: 104: 101: –  100: 96: 95:Find sources: 89: 85: 79: 78: 73:This article 71: 67: 62: 61: 56: 54: 47: 46: 41: 40: 35: 30: 21: 20: 713:expanding it 702: 687: 672: 670:Rule of Law 669: 666: 663: 621: 609: 597: 585: 564: 557:EWCA Civ 669 550: 538: 514: 502: 490: 466: 454: 442: 428: 416: 406:Lumley v Gye 404: 343: 333: 318: 314: 302: 276: 275: 274: 233: 218: 202: 176: 146: 137: 127: 120: 113: 106: 94: 82:Please help 77:verification 74: 50: 43: 37: 36:Please help 33: 587:The Rosella 576:TULRCA 1992 529:TULRCA 1992 492:BBC v Hearn 481:TULRCA 1992 395:TULRCA 1992 752:Categories 660:References 540:P v NASUWT 531:ss 226-234 196:; try the 183:link to it 140:April 2019 110:newspapers 39:improve it 634:UK labour 614:ECHR 1345 205:June 2018 186:. Please 45:talk page 705:case law 623:RMT v UK 543:2 AC 663 521:1 AC 366 473:2 AC 570 459:2 Ch 106 353:See also 311:Judgment 264:Keywords 254:Citation 507:ICR 204 495:ICR 686 281:UKPC 11 258:UKPC 11 124:scholar 638:unions 447:AC 269 435:AC 435 421:AC 426 324:, the 269:Health 179:orphan 177:is an 126:  119:  112:  105:  97:  703:This 655:Notes 483:s 244 397:s 219 299:Facts 244:Court 131:JSTOR 117:books 709:stub 636:and 632:see 103:news 86:by 754:: 295:. 48:. 740:e 733:t 726:v 715:. 380:e 373:t 366:v 225:) 219:( 207:) 203:( 153:) 147:( 142:) 138:( 128:· 121:· 114:· 107:· 80:. 55:) 51:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Collymore v Attorney General"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

orphan
link to it
introduce links
related articles
Find link tool
Learn how and when to remove this message
UK Privy Council
UKPC 11
UKPC 11
Privy Council
UK labour law
right to strike
Trinidad and Tobago
Trade Union Act 1871
Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.