Knowledge (XXG)

Dose–response relationship

Source 📝

142: 1331: 36: 515: 243:
levels of exposure. Dose response relationships modelled by dose response curves are used extensively in pharmacology and drug development. In particular, the shape of a drug's dose–response curve (quantified by EC50, nH and ymax parameters) reflects the biological activity and strength of the drug.
1692:
Neubig, Richard R.; Spedding, Michael; Kenakin, Terry; Christopoulos, Arthur; International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug, Classification. (December 2003). "International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII.
965:
The first point along the graph where a response above zero (or above the control response) is reached is usually referred to as a threshold dose. For most beneficial or recreational drugs, the desired effects are found at doses slightly greater than the threshold dose. At higher doses, undesired
259:
for mechanical pressure. However, stimuli (such as temperatures or radiation) may also affect physiological processes beyond sensation (and even give the measurable response of death). Responses can be recorded as continuous data (e.g. force of muscle contraction) or discrete data (e.g. number of
970:
appear and grow stronger as the dose increases. The more potent a particular substance is, the steeper this curve will be. In quantitative situations, the Y-axis often is designated by percentages, which refer to the percentage of exposed individuals registering a standard response (which may be
242:
reflects how a small amount of a toxin has no significant effect, while a large amount may be fatal. This reflects how dose–response relationships can be used in individuals. In populations, dose–response relationships can describe the way groups of people or organisms are affected at different
932: 1317:
Dose–response relationships generally depend on the exposure time and exposure route (e.g., inhalation, dietary intake); quantifying the response after a different exposure time or for a different route leads to a different relationship and possibly different conclusions on the effects of the
499:
of the hypothetical response to agonist, log concentration on the x-axis, in combination with different antagonist concentrations. The parameters of the curves, and how the antagonist changes them, gives useful information about the agonist's pharmacological profile. This curve is similar but
493: 1272: 992:, or grams per kilogram of body-weight for oral exposures or milligrams per cubic meter of ambient air for inhalation exposures. Other dose units include moles per body-weight, moles per animal, and for dermal exposure, moles per square centimeter. 1135: 219:
Studying dose response, and developing dose–response models, is central to determining "safe", "hazardous" and (where relevant) beneficial levels and dosages for drugs, pollutants, foods, and other substances to which humans or other
1309:
may be more appropriate, depending on the circumstances. A recent critique of these models as they apply to endocrine disruptors argues for a substantial revision of testing and toxicological models at low doses because of observed
1837:
Vandenberg, Laura N.; Colborn, Theo; Hayes, Tyrone B.; Heindel, Jerrold J.; Jacobs, David R.; Lee, Duk-Hee; Shioda, Toshi; Soto, Ana M.; vom Saal, Frederick S.; Welshons, Wade V.; Zoeller, R. Thomas; Myers, John Peterson (2012).
1318:
stressor under consideration. This limitation is caused by the complexity of biological systems and the often unknown biological processes operating between the external exposure and the adverse cellular or tissue response.
769: 592:, or other methods such as the Spearman–Kärber method. Empirical models based on nonlinear regression are usually preferred over the use of some transformation of the data that linearizes the dose-response relationship. 978:). Such a curve is referred to as a quantal dose–response curve, distinguishing it from a graded dose–response curve, where response is continuous (either measured, or by judgment). 1146: 736: 1014: 703: 53: 1633:
Di Veroli, Giovanni Y.; Fornari, Chiara; Goldlust, Ian; Mills, Graham; Koh, Siang Boon; Bramhall, Jo L.; Richards, Frances M.; Jodrell, Duncan I. (1 October 2015).
1820:
Roeland van Wijk et al., Non-monotonic dynamics and crosstalk in signaling pathways and their implications for pharmacology. Scientific Reports 5:11376 (2015)
1474: 757: 673: 577:, with the steepest portion in the middle. Biologically based models using dose are preferred over the use of log(dose) because the latter can visually imply a 225: 1008:
model is a generalization of the Hill equation where an effect can be set for zero dose. Using the same notation as above, we can express the model as:
927:{\displaystyle {\frac {E}{E_{\mathrm {max} }}}={\frac {^{n}}{{\text{EC}}_{50}^{n}+^{n}}}={\frac {1}{1+\left({\frac {\mathrm {EC} _{50}}{}}\right)^{n}}}} 149:. Low doses are insufficient to generate a response, while high doses generate a maximal response. The steepest point of the curve corresponds with an 1567:
Hamilton, MA; Russo, RC; Thurston, RV (1977). "Trimmed Spearman–Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays".
100: 1941: 72: 1805: 1569: 2033: 1998: 1289:
The shape of dose-response curve typically depends on the topology of the targeted reaction network. While the shape of the curve is often
569:) can be studied. The applied dose is generally plotted on the X axis and the response is plotted on the Y axis. In some cases, it is the 537: 79: 251:
Some example measures for dose–response relationships are shown in the tables below. Each sensory stimulus corresponds with a particular
2727: 1488: 1301:
The concept of linear dose–response relationship, thresholds, and all-or-nothing responses may not apply to non-linear situations. A
1617: 1522: 229: 119: 86: 2717: 2657: 2150: 68: 2712: 2408: 2319: 57: 2637: 2262: 1379: 2190: 1496: 959: 652: 637: 627: 566: 172: 2380: 562: 981:
The Hill equation can be used to describe dose–response relationships, for example ion channel-open-probability vs.
2115: 1934: 309: 46: 2757: 2627: 2375: 2369: 1306: 967: 238: 228:
has developed extensive guidance and reports on dose–response modeling and assessment, as well as software. The
93: 2692: 2394: 1267:{\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {hill} }={\frac {{}^{n}\times {E_{\mathrm {max} }}}{{}^{n}+\mathrm {EC} _{50}^{n}}}} 614:
Specific to response to doses of radiation the Health Physics Society (in the United States) has published a
2443: 2205: 2200: 2110: 2028: 565:
relating the magnitude of a dose (stimulus) to the response of a biological system. A number of effects (or
299: 618:
on the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model though the society has not adopted a policy on LNT."
2579: 2340: 2315: 2250: 2139: 2023: 938: 445: 180: 1404: 1374: 941:(such as EC50, IC50, ED50, etc.) and measures of efficacy (such as tissue, cell or population response). 2687: 2479: 2281: 1958: 1927: 1384: 709: 188: 1465: 604: 2722: 2584: 2494: 2335: 2215: 1983: 1646: 1609: 1578: 1399: 1281:
model is the single most common model for describing dose-response relationship in drug development.
600: 351: 333: 2762: 2632: 2520: 2489: 2135: 2095: 2018: 316: 184: 157: 141: 1431: 1130:{\displaystyle E=E_{0}+{\frac {{}^{n}\times {E_{\mathrm {max} }}}{{}^{n}+\mathrm {EC} _{50}^{n}}}} 500:
distinct from that, which is generated with the ligand-bound receptor concentration on the y-axis.
2602: 2552: 2453: 2266: 2245: 2145: 2066: 1978: 1718: 1409: 1311: 1290: 972: 383: 1635:"An automated fitting procedure and software for dose-response curves with multiphasic features" 584:
Statistical analysis of dose–response curves may be performed by regression methods such as the
135: 1840:"Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses" 615: 2597: 2458: 2448: 2276: 2270: 2105: 1869: 1801: 1767: 1710: 1674: 1613: 1549: 1443: 641: 211:
is defined more broadly as the response from any type of stimulus, not limited to chemicals.
678: 2642: 2530: 2525: 2325: 2295: 2081: 2061: 2043: 1859: 1851: 1821: 1793: 1757: 1749: 1702: 1664: 1654: 1586: 1539: 1531: 1489:"Exposure-Response Relationships — Study Design, Data Analysis, and Regulatory Applications" 1394: 760: 633: 574: 527: 457: 252: 233: 2682: 2557: 2385: 2345: 2330: 2038: 1988: 1461: 1361: 1302: 492: 453: 256: 1914: 1650: 1582: 1432:"Fundamental Carcinogenic Processes and Their Implications for Low Dose Risk Assessment" 536:
Please expand the section to include this information. Further details may exist on the
2672: 2652: 2571: 2413: 2155: 2100: 1864: 1839: 1762: 1737: 1669: 1634: 1544: 1517: 742: 658: 608: 578: 467: 338: 1330: 236:. Dose response relationships may be used in individuals or in populations. The adage 2751: 2677: 2164: 2071: 1908: 496: 2647: 2607: 2508: 2432: 2310: 1993: 1950: 1722: 585: 475: 471: 444:
Severity of lesion, blood pressure, heart rate, extent of movement, attentiveness,
423: 293: 145:
A dose response curve showing the normalised tissue response to stimulation by an
199:) after a certain exposure time. Dose–response relationships can be described by 2732: 2219: 2195: 989: 645: 589: 346: 325: 35: 1895: 462:
ATP production, proliferation, muscle contraction, bile production, cell death
2612: 2544: 2436: 2211: 596: 438: 419: 531: 17: 2390: 1797: 570: 394: 1873: 1771: 1714: 1678: 514: 1788:
Macdougall, James (2006). "Analysis of Dose–Response Studies—Emax Model".
1753: 1553: 595:
Typical experimental design for measuring dose-response relationships are
224:
are exposed. These conclusions are often the basis for public policy. The
2512: 2484: 2471: 2240: 2160: 1855: 1447: 1389: 434: 321: 289: 255:, for instance the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor for nicotine, or the 221: 196: 192: 176: 1590: 1430:
Crump, K. S.; Hoel, D. G.; Langley, C. H.; Peto, R. (1 September 1976).
1973: 1535: 284: 146: 1825: 1706: 1659: 982: 648:. A generalized model for multiphasic cases has also been suggested. 304: 1467:
Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS) Version 2.1 User's Manual Version 2.0
705:
is the drug concentration (or equivalently, stimulus intensity) and
739:
is the drug concentration that produces a 50% maximal response and
573:
of the dose that is plotted on the X axis. The curve is typically
491: 278: 232:
also has guidance to elucidate dose–response relationships during
2365: 2258: 2254: 2056: 1293:, in some cases non-monotonic dose response curves can be seen. 945: 706: 526:
about All the other models in drug development like "Emax"; try
274: 150: 1923: 1919: 1904: 1325: 937:
The parameters of the dose response curve reflect measures of
644:
with respect to the logarithm of the dose and is similar to a
508: 134:"Dose-response" redirects here. For the academic journal, see 29: 951:
curve, the half maximal effective concentration, where the EC
1890: 1693:
Update on Terms and Symbols in Quantitative Pharmacology".
1915:
CDD Vault, Example of Dose-Response Curve fitting software
203:. This is explained further in the following sections. A 1792:. Statistics for Biology and Health. pp. 127–145. 1342: 955:
point is defined as the inflection point of the curve.
405: 1911:, with emphasis on toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic models 1149: 1017: 772: 745: 712: 681: 661: 481:
ATP production, calcium signals, morphology, mitosis
1364:
may also provide insights into the effect of drugs.
2705: 2665: 2621: 2570: 2543: 2507: 2470: 2431: 2422: 2358: 2303: 2294: 2233: 2178: 2127: 2089: 2080: 2011: 1966: 1957: 215:
Motivation for studying dose–response relationships
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 1606:Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications 1266: 1129: 926: 751: 730: 697: 667: 1738:"Single Channel Properties of P2X2 Purinoceptors" 958:Dose response curves are typically fitted to the 1748:(5). The Rockefeller University Press: 695–720. 632:Logarithmic dose–response curves are generally 1935: 1475:United States Environmental Protection Agency 488:Analysis and creation of dose–response curves 8: 1604:Bates, Douglas M.; Watts, Donald G. (1988). 636:and monotonic and can be fit to a classical 944:A commonly used dose–response curve is the 2702: 2662: 2567: 2540: 2504: 2467: 2428: 2355: 2300: 2230: 2175: 2124: 2086: 2008: 1963: 1942: 1928: 1920: 262: 1863: 1761: 1668: 1658: 1543: 1518:"Modeling of dose-response relationships" 1255: 1250: 1242: 1232: 1221: 1204: 1203: 1198: 1189: 1178: 1174: 1155: 1154: 1148: 1118: 1113: 1105: 1095: 1084: 1067: 1066: 1061: 1052: 1041: 1037: 1028: 1016: 915: 892: 884: 881: 864: 852: 833: 828: 823: 814: 801: 783: 782: 773: 771: 744: 722: 714: 711: 683: 682: 680: 660: 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 140: 27:Measure of organism response to stimulus 1783: 1781: 1422: 1570:Environmental Science & Technology 1477:, Office of Environmental Information. 1314:, i.e. U-shaped dose/response curves. 1140:Compare with a rearrangement of Hill: 7: 1907:A website on mathematical models in 1511: 1509: 1507: 505:Construction of dose–response curves 226:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 58:adding citations to reliable sources 2728:Minimum bactericidal concentration 1473:(Draft ed.). Washington, DC: 1246: 1243: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1109: 1106: 1074: 1071: 1068: 888: 885: 790: 787: 784: 731:{\displaystyle \mathrm {EC} _{50}} 718: 715: 675:is the magnitude of the response, 25: 1523:Environmental Health Perspectives 230:U.S. Food and Drug Administration 171:, describes the magnitude of the 2718:Minimum inhibitory concentration 1790:Dose Finding in Drug Development 1329: 655:is the following formula, where 513: 34: 2658:WHO list of essential medicines 2151:Non-specific effect of vaccines 988:Dose is usually in milligrams, 45:needs additional citations for 2713:Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics 1891:Online Tool for ELISA Analysis 1228: 1222: 1185: 1179: 1091: 1085: 1048: 1042: 905: 899: 849: 842: 811: 804: 690: 684: 169:exposure–response relationship 1: 2638:Functional analog (chemistry) 1380:Ceiling effect (pharmacology) 429:Death, loss of consciousness 366:Illumination/Light intensity 247:Example stimuli and responses 2191:Hill equation (biochemistry) 1497:Food and Drug Administration 1285:Shape of dose-response curve 628:Hill equation (biochemistry) 581:when in fact there is none. 69:"Dose–response relationship" 2779: 2706:Antimicrobial pharmacology 2186:Dose–response relationship 2116:Desensitization (medicine) 1736:Ding, S; Sachs, F (1999). 625: 205:stimulus response function 165:dose–response relationship 133: 2628:Coinduction (anesthetics) 1307:linear no-threshold model 640:. The Hill equation is a 393: 381: 373: 365: 357: 345: 298: 273: 265: 239:The dose makes the poison 2693:Multiple drug resistance 2666:Tolerance and resistance 2034:Physiological antagonist 698:{\displaystyle {\ce {}}} 532:10.1007/0-387-33706-7_10 2444:Neuropsychopharmacology 2206:Cheng-Prussoff Equation 2201:Del Castillo Katz model 2128:Other effects of ligand 2111:Receptor (biochemistry) 2029:Irreversible antagonist 1798:10.1007/0-387-33706-7_9 1695:Pharmacological Reviews 1442:(9 Part 1): 2973–2979. 209:stimulus response curve 2580:Classical pharmacology 2341:Plasma protein binding 2316:Volume of distribution 2024:Competitive antagonist 1268: 1131: 928: 753: 732: 699: 669: 524:is missing information 501: 160: 2688:Antibiotic resistance 2480:Clinical pharmacology 1999:Physiological agonist 1959:Ligand (biochemistry) 1754:10.1085/jgp.113.5.695 1516:Altshuler, B (1981). 1385:Certain safety factor 1269: 1132: 929: 754: 733: 700: 670: 601:ligand binding assays 495: 352:Temperature receptors 300:Biochemical receptors 144: 2585:Reverse pharmacology 2495:Pharmacoepidemiology 2336:Biological half-life 2216:Ligand binding assay 2090:Activity at receptor 1984:Irreversible agonist 1856:10.1210/er.2011-1050 1400:Spatial epidemiology 1147: 1015: 770: 743: 710: 679: 659: 609:clinical drug trials 382:Pathogen dose (e.g. 374:Mechanical pressure 334:Allosteric modulator 201:dose–response curves 54:improve this article 2633:Combination therapy 2521:Pharmacoinformatics 2490:Medicinal chemistry 2096:Mechanism of action 1651:2015NatSR...514701V 1591:10.1021/es60130a004 1583:1977EnST...11..714H 1260: 1123: 838: 559:dose–response curve 407: 2603:Immunopharmacology 2553:Pharmacotoxicology 2454:Psychopharmacology 2246:Intrinsic activity 2146:Pleiotropy (drugs) 2067:Agonist-antagonist 1979:Endogenous agonist 1639:Scientific Reports 1536:10.1289/ehp.814223 1410:Dose fractionation 1341:. You can help by 1264: 1241: 1127: 1104: 924: 822: 749: 728: 695: 665: 616:documentary series 502: 406: 161: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2701: 2700: 2598:Photopharmacology 2593: 2592: 2566: 2565: 2539: 2538: 2503: 2502: 2466: 2465: 2459:Electrophysiology 2449:Neuropharmacology 2404: 2403: 2354: 2353: 2290: 2289: 2277:Therapeutic index 2229: 2228: 2174: 2173: 2123: 2122: 2052: 2051: 2007: 2006: 1844:Endocrine Reviews 1826:10.1038/srep11376 1807:978-0-387-29074-4 1707:10.1124/pr.55.4.4 1660:10.1038/srep14701 1405:Weber–Fechner law 1375:Arndt–Schulz rule 1359: 1358: 1262: 1125: 922: 909: 859: 826: 796: 752:{\displaystyle n} 689: 668:{\displaystyle E} 642:logistic function 605:functional assays 555: 554: 485: 484: 414:Example Response 404: 403: 377:Mechanoreceptors 266:Example Stimulus 130: 129: 122: 104: 16:(Redirected from 2770: 2758:Pharmacodynamics 2703: 2663: 2643:Polypharmacology 2568: 2541: 2531:Pharmacogenomics 2526:Pharmacogenetics 2505: 2468: 2429: 2356: 2326:Rate of infusion 2301: 2296:Pharmacokinetics 2231: 2176: 2125: 2087: 2082:Pharmacodynamics 2062:Neurotransmitter 2044:Enzyme inhibitor 2009: 1964: 1944: 1937: 1930: 1921: 1878: 1877: 1867: 1834: 1828: 1818: 1812: 1811: 1785: 1776: 1775: 1765: 1733: 1727: 1726: 1689: 1683: 1682: 1672: 1662: 1630: 1624: 1623: 1601: 1595: 1594: 1564: 1558: 1557: 1547: 1513: 1502: 1501: 1500:. 26 March 2019. 1493: 1485: 1479: 1478: 1472: 1458: 1452: 1451: 1427: 1395:Pharmacodynamics 1354: 1351: 1333: 1326: 1273: 1271: 1270: 1265: 1263: 1261: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1237: 1236: 1231: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1136: 1134: 1133: 1128: 1126: 1124: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1100: 1099: 1094: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1038: 1033: 1032: 933: 931: 930: 925: 923: 921: 920: 919: 914: 910: 908: 897: 896: 891: 882: 865: 860: 858: 857: 856: 837: 832: 827: 824: 820: 819: 818: 802: 797: 795: 794: 793: 774: 761:Hill coefficient 758: 756: 755: 750: 737: 735: 734: 729: 727: 726: 721: 704: 702: 701: 696: 694: 693: 687: 674: 672: 671: 666: 563:coordinate graph 550: 547: 541: 517: 509: 408: 263: 253:sensory receptor 234:drug development 183:of exposure (or 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 103: 62: 38: 30: 21: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2737: 2697: 2683:Drug resistance 2661: 2617: 2589: 2562: 2558:Neurotoxicology 2535: 2499: 2462: 2424: 2418: 2400: 2350: 2346:Bioavailability 2331:Onset of action 2286: 2225: 2170: 2119: 2076: 2048: 2039:Inverse agonist 2003: 1989:Partial agonist 1953: 1948: 1899: 1887: 1882: 1881: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1819: 1815: 1808: 1787: 1786: 1779: 1742:J. Gen. Physiol 1735: 1734: 1730: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1620: 1612:. p. 365. 1603: 1602: 1598: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1515: 1514: 1505: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1470: 1462:Lockheed Martin 1460: 1459: 1455: 1436:Cancer Research 1429: 1428: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1370: 1362:Schild analysis 1355: 1349: 1346: 1339:needs expansion 1324: 1322:Schild analysis 1303:threshold model 1299: 1287: 1280: 1220: 1219: 1199: 1177: 1176: 1150: 1145: 1144: 1083: 1082: 1062: 1040: 1039: 1024: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1002: 999: 985:concentration. 976: 954: 949: 898: 883: 877: 876: 869: 848: 821: 810: 803: 778: 768: 767: 741: 740: 713: 708: 707: 677: 676: 657: 656: 634:sigmoidal-shape 630: 624: 551: 545: 542: 535: 518: 507: 490: 437:/Whole animal ( 369:Photoreceptors 336: 319: 308: 303: 287: 257:mechanoreceptor 249: 217: 154: 139: 126: 115: 109: 106: 63: 61: 51: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2776: 2774: 2766: 2765: 2760: 2750: 2749: 2743: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2736: 2735: 2730: 2725: 2723:Bacteriostatic 2720: 2715: 2709: 2707: 2699: 2698: 2696: 2695: 2690: 2685: 2680: 2675: 2673:Drug tolerance 2669: 2667: 2660: 2655: 2653:Lists of drugs 2650: 2645: 2640: 2635: 2630: 2625: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2616: 2615: 2610: 2605: 2600: 2594: 2591: 2590: 2588: 2587: 2582: 2576: 2574: 2572:Drug discovery 2564: 2563: 2561: 2560: 2555: 2549: 2547: 2537: 2536: 2534: 2533: 2528: 2523: 2517: 2515: 2501: 2500: 2498: 2497: 2492: 2487: 2482: 2476: 2474: 2464: 2463: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2439: 2426: 2420: 2419: 2417: 2416: 2414:Bioequivalence 2411: 2405: 2402: 2401: 2399: 2398: 2388: 2383: 2378: 2373: 2362: 2360: 2352: 2351: 2349: 2348: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2328: 2323: 2313: 2307: 2305: 2298: 2292: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2285: 2284: 2279: 2274: 2248: 2243: 2237: 2235: 2227: 2226: 2224: 2223: 2208: 2203: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2182: 2180: 2172: 2171: 2169: 2168: 2158: 2156:Adverse effect 2153: 2148: 2143: 2131: 2129: 2121: 2120: 2118: 2113: 2108: 2103: 2101:Mode of action 2098: 2093: 2091: 2084: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2074: 2069: 2064: 2059: 2053: 2050: 2049: 2047: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2015: 2013: 2005: 2004: 2002: 2001: 1996: 1991: 1986: 1981: 1976: 1970: 1968: 1961: 1955: 1954: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1939: 1932: 1924: 1918: 1917: 1912: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1886: 1885:External links 1883: 1880: 1879: 1850:(3): 378–455. 1829: 1813: 1806: 1777: 1728: 1701:(4): 597–606. 1684: 1625: 1618: 1596: 1559: 1503: 1480: 1453: 1421: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1357: 1356: 1336: 1334: 1323: 1320: 1298: 1295: 1286: 1283: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1258: 1253: 1248: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1173: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1153: 1138: 1137: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1044: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1005: 1001: 997: 994: 974: 952: 947: 935: 934: 918: 913: 907: 904: 901: 895: 890: 887: 880: 875: 872: 868: 863: 855: 851: 847: 844: 841: 836: 831: 817: 813: 809: 806: 800: 792: 789: 786: 781: 777: 748: 725: 720: 717: 692: 686: 664: 626:Main article: 623: 620: 599:preparations, 579:threshold dose 553: 552: 521: 519: 512: 506: 503: 497:Semi-log plots 489: 486: 483: 482: 479: 464: 463: 460: 450: 449: 442: 431: 430: 427: 416: 415: 412: 402: 401: 398: 391: 390: 387: 379: 378: 375: 371: 370: 367: 363: 362: 359: 355: 354: 349: 343: 342: 339:Benzodiazepine 330: 329: 313: 312: 297: 282: 271: 270: 267: 248: 245: 216: 213: 152: 128: 127: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2775: 2764: 2761: 2759: 2756: 2755: 2753: 2734: 2731: 2729: 2726: 2724: 2721: 2719: 2716: 2714: 2711: 2710: 2708: 2704: 2694: 2691: 2689: 2686: 2684: 2681: 2679: 2678:Tachyphylaxis 2676: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2668: 2664: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2651: 2649: 2646: 2644: 2641: 2639: 2636: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2586: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2577: 2575: 2573: 2569: 2559: 2556: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2548: 2546: 2542: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2516: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2477: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2427: 2421: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2407: 2406: 2396: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2361: 2357: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2324: 2321: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2293: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2249: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2236: 2232: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2192: 2189: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2166: 2165:Neurotoxicity 2162: 2159: 2157: 2154: 2152: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2134:Selectivity ( 2133: 2132: 2130: 2126: 2117: 2114: 2112: 2109: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2094: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2083: 2079: 2073: 2072:Pharmacophore 2070: 2068: 2065: 2063: 2060: 2058: 2055: 2054: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1987: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1969: 1965: 1962: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1945: 1940: 1938: 1933: 1931: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1916: 1913: 1910: 1909:ecotoxicology 1906: 1903: 1901: 1894: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1875: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1817: 1814: 1809: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1784: 1782: 1778: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1732: 1729: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1688: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1629: 1626: 1621: 1619:9780471816430 1615: 1611: 1607: 1600: 1597: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1563: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1519: 1512: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1490: 1484: 1481: 1476: 1469: 1468: 1463: 1457: 1454: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1426: 1423: 1416: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1367: 1365: 1363: 1353: 1344: 1340: 1337:This section 1335: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1321: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1308: 1304: 1296: 1294: 1292: 1284: 1282: 1256: 1251: 1238: 1233: 1225: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1182: 1171: 1151: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1119: 1114: 1101: 1096: 1088: 1063: 1058: 1053: 1045: 1034: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1011: 1010: 1009: 995: 993: 991: 986: 984: 979: 977: 971:death, as in 969: 963: 961: 960:Hill equation 956: 950: 942: 940: 916: 911: 902: 893: 878: 873: 870: 866: 861: 853: 845: 839: 834: 829: 815: 807: 798: 779: 775: 766: 765: 764: 762: 746: 738: 723: 662: 654: 653:Hill equation 649: 647: 643: 639: 638:Hill equation 635: 629: 622:Hill equation 621: 619: 617: 612: 610: 606: 602: 598: 593: 591: 587: 582: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 549: 539: 533: 529: 525: 522:This section 520: 516: 511: 510: 504: 498: 494: 487: 480: 477: 473: 469: 466: 465: 461: 459: 455: 452: 451: 447: 443: 440: 436: 433: 432: 428: 425: 421: 418: 417: 413: 411:System Level 410: 409: 399: 396: 392: 388: 385: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 358:Sound levels 356: 353: 350: 348: 344: 340: 335: 332: 331: 327: 323: 318: 315: 314: 311: 306: 301: 295: 291: 286: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 261: 258: 254: 246: 244: 241: 240: 235: 231: 227: 223: 214: 212: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 159: 155: 148: 143: 137: 136:Dose–Response 132: 124: 121: 113: 102: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: –  70: 66: 65:Find sources: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 37: 32: 31: 19: 18:Dose-response 2648:Chemotherapy 2608:Cell biology 2509:Biochemistry 2433:Neuroscience 2381:Distribution 2311:Loading dose 2185: 1994:Superagonist 1951:Pharmacology 1905:Ecotoxmodels 1847: 1843: 1832: 1816: 1789: 1745: 1741: 1731: 1698: 1694: 1687: 1645:(1): 14701. 1642: 1638: 1628: 1605: 1599: 1577:(7): 714–9. 1574: 1568: 1562: 1527: 1521: 1495: 1483: 1466: 1456: 1439: 1435: 1425: 1360: 1347: 1343:adding to it 1338: 1316: 1312:monotonicity 1300: 1288: 1276: 1139: 1003: 987: 980: 968:side effects 964: 957: 943: 936: 650: 631: 613: 594: 586:probit model 583: 558: 556: 543: 523: 476:Biochemistry 472:Cell biology 424:Epidemiology 310:Transporters 294:isoprenaline 250: 237: 218: 208: 204: 200: 168: 164: 162: 131: 116: 107: 97: 90: 83: 76: 64: 52:Please help 47:verification 44: 2733:Bactericide 2409:Compartment 2220:Patch clamp 2196:Schild plot 1297:Limitations 646:logit model 590:logit model 361:Hair cells 347:Temperature 326:propranolol 195:(usually a 110:August 2018 2763:Toxicology 2752:Categories 2613:Physiology 2545:Toxicology 2437:psychology 2386:Metabolism 2376:Absorption 2370:Liberation 2212:Organ bath 2140:Functional 2019:Antagonist 2012:Inhibitory 1967:Excitatory 1900:Calculator 1417:References 1350:April 2019 990:micrograms 597:organ bath 546:April 2023 439:Physiology 420:Population 397:intensity 317:Antagonist 260:deaths). 80:newspapers 2395:Clearance 2391:Excretion 2210:Methods ( 1896:Online IC 1291:monotonic 1196:× 1059:× 575:sigmoidal 571:logarithm 567:endpoints 538:talk page 395:Radiation 222:organisms 2513:genetics 2485:Pharmacy 2472:Medicine 2282:Affinity 2241:Efficacy 2179:Analysis 2161:Toxicity 1874:22419778 1772:10228183 1715:14657418 1679:26424192 1530:: 23–7. 1464:(2009). 1390:Hormesis 1368:See also 435:Organism 322:ketamine 290:nicotine 197:chemical 193:stressor 189:stimulus 181:function 177:organism 173:response 2423:Related 2366:(L)ADME 2320:Initial 2304:Metrics 2251:Potency 2234:Metrics 2136:Binding 2106:Binding 1974:Agonist 1865:3365860 1763:2222910 1723:1729572 1670:4589737 1647:Bibcode 1579:Bibcode 1554:7333256 1545:1568781 939:potency 759:is the 534:§ 10.2. 305:Enzymes 285:Agonist 269:Target 187:) to a 179:, as a 156:of 0.7 147:agonist 94:scholar 2425:fields 1872:  1862:  1804:  1770:  1760:  1721:  1713:  1677:  1667:  1616:  1552:  1542:  1448:975067 1446:  983:ligand 607:, and 458:Tissue 337:(e.g. 320:(e.g. 288:(e.g. 175:of an 96:  89:  82:  75:  67:  2622:Other 2359:LADME 1719:S2CID 1610:Wiley 1492:(PDF) 1471:(PDF) 1277:The E 1004:The E 1000:model 561:is a 454:Organ 448:data 279:Toxin 185:doses 167:, or 158:molar 101:JSTOR 87:books 2511:and 2435:and 2271:TD50 2267:LD50 2263:ED50 2259:IC50 2255:EC50 2057:Drug 1870:PMID 1802:ISBN 1768:PMID 1711:PMID 1675:PMID 1614:ISBN 1550:PMID 1444:PMID 1310:non- 651:The 468:Cell 400:n/a 389:n/a 281:dose 275:Drug 163:The 73:news 2368:: ( 1860:PMC 1852:doi 1822:doi 1794:doi 1758:PMC 1750:doi 1746:113 1703:doi 1665:PMC 1655:doi 1587:doi 1540:PMC 1532:doi 1345:. 1305:or 1279:max 1006:max 998:max 588:or 528:doi 446:EEG 384:LPS 207:or 191:or 56:by 2754:: 2269:, 2265:, 2261:, 2257:, 2218:, 2214:, 2138:, 1898:50 1868:. 1858:. 1848:33 1846:. 1842:. 1800:. 1780:^ 1766:. 1756:. 1744:. 1740:. 1717:. 1709:. 1699:55 1697:. 1673:. 1663:. 1653:. 1641:. 1637:. 1608:. 1585:. 1575:11 1573:. 1548:. 1538:. 1528:42 1526:. 1520:. 1506:^ 1494:. 1440:36 1438:. 1434:. 1252:50 1115:50 975:50 973:LD 962:. 953:50 948:50 946:EC 894:50 830:50 825:EC 763:. 724:50 611:. 603:, 557:A 478:) 474:, 441:) 426:) 386:) 341:) 328:) 324:, 296:) 292:, 153:50 151:EC 2397:) 2393:( 2372:) 2322:) 2318:( 2273:) 2253:( 2222:) 2167:) 2163:( 2142:) 1943:e 1936:t 1929:v 1876:. 1854:: 1824:: 1810:. 1796:: 1774:. 1752:: 1725:. 1705:: 1681:. 1657:: 1649:: 1643:5 1622:. 1593:. 1589:: 1581:: 1556:. 1534:: 1450:. 1352:) 1348:( 1257:n 1247:C 1244:E 1239:+ 1234:n 1229:] 1226:A 1223:[ 1212:x 1209:a 1206:m 1201:E 1191:n 1186:] 1183:A 1180:[ 1172:= 1166:l 1163:l 1160:i 1157:h 1152:E 1120:n 1110:C 1107:E 1102:+ 1097:n 1092:] 1089:A 1086:[ 1075:x 1072:a 1069:m 1064:E 1054:n 1049:] 1046:A 1043:[ 1035:+ 1030:0 1026:E 1022:= 1019:E 996:E 917:n 912:) 906:] 903:A 900:[ 889:C 886:E 879:( 874:+ 871:1 867:1 862:= 854:n 850:] 846:A 843:[ 840:+ 835:n 816:n 812:] 808:A 805:[ 799:= 791:x 788:a 785:m 780:E 776:E 747:n 719:C 716:E 691:] 688:A 685:[ 663:E 548:) 544:( 540:. 530:: 470:( 456:/ 422:( 307:, 302:, 277:/ 138:. 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 98:· 91:· 84:· 77:· 50:. 20:)

Index

Dose-response

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Dose–response relationship"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Dose–Response

agonist
EC50
molar
response
organism
function
doses
stimulus
stressor
chemical
organisms
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
drug development
The dose makes the poison
sensory receptor

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.