Knowledge (XXG)

Principle of explosion

Source 📝

54: 1615: 624:
standing for "Unicorns exist". We start out by assuming that (1) all lemons are yellow and that (2) not all lemons are yellow. From the proposition that all lemons are yellow, we infer that (3) either all lemons are yellow or unicorns exist. But then from this and the fact that not all lemons are
265:
However, since we also know that "Not all lemons are yellow" (as this has been assumed), the first part is false, and hence the second part must be true to ensure the two-part statement to be true, i.e., unicorns exist (this inference is known as the
1046: 979: 205:
is disastrous; since any statement can be proven, it trivializes the concepts of truth and falsity. Around the turn of the 20th century, the discovery of contradictions such as
925: 850: 795: 756: 346: 430: 701: 681: 532: 494: 890: 870: 815: 721: 655: 622: 602: 564: 459: 981:
and devise semantical systems in which there are such models. Alternatively, they reject the idea that propositions can be classified as true or false.
1511: 2000: 1711: 240:
are yellow" and "Not all lemons are yellow"—and suppose that both are true. If that is the case, anything can be proven, e.g., the assertion that "
71: 1427: 1321: 258:
unicorns exist" must also be true, since the first part of the statement ("All lemons are yellow") has already been assumed, and the use of "
289:
In a different solution to the problems posed by the principle of explosion, some mathematicians have devised alternative theories of
118: 1477: 1452: 137: 1918: 90: 230: 97: 1979: 1584: 1539: 985:
paraconsistent logics usually deny the validity of one of the steps necessary for deriving an explosion, typically including
167: 75: 1969: 1504: 1777: 1665: 104: 299:, which allow some contradictory statements to be proven without affecting the truth value of (all) other statements. 1818: 1792: 1782: 1685: 86: 64: 1833: 1823: 1574: 982: 2005: 1802: 1797: 1787: 1497: 1065: 990: 943: 536: 209:
at the foundations of mathematics thus threatened the entire structure of mathematics. Mathematicians such as
31: 1933: 1843: 1838: 1828: 1680: 1102: 1022: 498: 463: 1011:
value of the principle of explosion is that for any logical system where this principle holds, any derived
949: 277:
exist (hence proving an additional contradiction where unicorns do and do not exist), as well as any other
1908: 1751: 1675: 1670: 1634: 1096: 1084: 1974: 1772: 1746: 1731: 1716: 1594: 1114: 986: 568: 267: 42: 895: 820: 765: 726: 316: 262:" means that if even one part of the statement is true, the statement as a whole must be true as well. 1964: 1736: 1589: 1120: 1108: 995: 935: 659: 294: 206: 155: 111: 2010: 1938: 1741: 1706: 1569: 1012: 406: 290: 278: 194: 1883: 1756: 1649: 1644: 1544: 1534: 1286: 1943: 1639: 1549: 1473: 1448: 1423: 1317: 1210: 1053: 171: 686: 666: 511: 1923: 1913: 1878: 1599: 1309: 1278: 1206: 476: 218: 584:
This is just the symbolic version of the informal argument given in the introduction, with
1959: 1863: 1520: 1008: 151: 1903: 1559: 1146: 875: 855: 800: 706: 640: 607: 587: 549: 444: 381: 308: 222: 1994: 1928: 1893: 1888: 1726: 1336: 1173: 1072: 1016: 214: 210: 202: 198: 175: 159: 1898: 1873: 1868: 1721: 1290: 634: 1064:
from falsehood. That is to say, the principle of explosion is an argument for the
311:, the principle of explosion can be expressed schematically in the following way: 1068:
in classical logic, because without it all truth statements become meaningless.
946:
paraconsistent logicians often deny the assumption that there can be no model of
581:
and is named after him, though versions of it were known to medieval logicians.
1564: 1554: 1090: 939: 578: 236:
As a demonstration of the principle, consider two contradictory statements—"All
179: 53: 1470:
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic (ed Stewart Shapiro)
193:
The proof of this principle was first given by 12th-century French philosopher
1629: 1313: 1282: 1126: 759: 226: 1308:. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Vol. 40. Springer. ix. 1267:
BaƟkent, Can (2013). "Some topological properties of paraconsistent models".
1604: 1357: 1123:– concluding that a proposition is false because it produces a contradiction 248:
We know that "Not all lemons are yellow", as it has been assumed to be true.
38: 1343:, edited by Priest, Beal, and Armour-Garb. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 25. 27:
Theorem which states that any statement can be proven from a contradiction
1579: 1269: 183: 1071:
Reduction in proof strength of logics without ex falso are discussed in
251:
We know that "All lemons are yellow", as it has been assumed to be true.
17: 1057: 241: 197:. Due to the principle of explosion, the existence of a contradiction ( 1129:– the belief that all statements of the form "P and not-P" are true 625:
yellow, we infer that (4) unicorns exist by disjunctive syllogism.
1489: 1061: 237: 1614: 1493: 37:"Ex falso quodlibet" redirects here. For the musical form, see 47: 1306:
Paraconsistent Logic: Consistency, Contradiction and Negation
30:"EFQ" redirects here. For the literary baseball journal, see 1401:
Logic, Language and Meaning, Volume 1. Introduction to Logic
1117:– a seeming paradox derived from the principle of explosion 229:
to eliminate these contradictions, resulting in the modern
254:
Therefore, the two-part statement "All lemons are yellow
1185:
Burgess2005 uses 2 and 3 as premises instead of this one
273:
The procedure may be repeated to prove that unicorns do
723:. However, there is no model of the contradictory set 1304:
Carnielli, Walter; Coniglio, Marcelo Esteban (2016).
1025: 952: 898: 878: 858: 823: 803: 768: 729: 709: 689: 669: 643: 610: 590: 552: 514: 479: 447: 409: 380:, a formal proof of the principle of explosion using 319: 1952: 1856: 1811: 1765: 1699: 1658: 1622: 1527: 1111:– a family of logics used to address contradictions 633:An alternate argument for the principle stems from 78:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 1358:"This is not a carrot: Paraconsistent mathematics" 1040: 973: 919: 884: 864: 844: 809: 789: 750: 715: 695: 675: 649: 616: 596: 558: 526: 488: 453: 424: 340: 41:. For the audio player and library organizer, see 1413: 1411: 1351: 1349: 1339:. 2011. "What's so bad about contradictions?" In 1420:Philosophical Logic: A Contemporary Introduction 1253:Philosophical Logic: A Contemporary Introduction 1093:– belief in the existence of true contradictions 1105:– no proposition can be both true and not true 364:are both true, then it logically follows that 1505: 8: 1218:Bulletin of Advanced Reasoning and Knowledge 968: 953: 1239:(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 1154: 1762: 1512: 1498: 1490: 1211:"Ex contradictione non sequitur quodlibet" 1159:, 'from contradiction, anything '. 1024: 951: 897: 877: 857: 822: 802: 767: 728: 708: 688: 668: 642: 609: 604:standing for "all lemons are yellow" and 589: 551: 513: 478: 446: 408: 318: 244:exist", by using the following argument: 138:Learn how and when to remove this message 1472:. Oxford University Press. p. 732. 1356:McKubre-Jordens, Maarten (August 2011). 386: 1198: 1139: 1060:, making it impossible to distinguish 1041:{\displaystyle \phi \land \lnot \phi } 974:{\displaystyle \{\phi ,\lnot \phi \}} 178:. That is, from a contradiction, any 7: 1447:(2nd ed.). Dover. p. 250. 1385:Philosophical and Mathematical Logic 1099:– every proposition is true or false 186:) can be inferred; this is known as 76:adding citations to reliable sources 938:have been developed that allow for 1443:Lewis, C I; Langford, C H (1959). 1153:, 'from falsehood, anything '; or 1032: 962: 908: 833: 817:. Thus, vacuously, every model of 778: 739: 690: 670: 480: 416: 326: 25: 920:{\displaystyle (P\wedge \lnot P)} 845:{\displaystyle (P\wedge \lnot P)} 790:{\displaystyle (P\wedge \lnot P)} 751:{\displaystyle (P\wedge \lnot P)} 341:{\displaystyle P,\lnot P\vdash Q} 1613: 1364:. Millennium Mathematics Project 52: 2001:Theorems in propositional logic 1237:An Introduction to Formal Logic 63:needs additional citations for 1980:Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1585:Problem of multiple generality 1403:. University of Chicago Press. 914: 899: 839: 824: 784: 769: 745: 730: 225:put much effort into revising 1: 1970:The Principles of Mathematics 892:is a semantic consequence of 425:{\displaystyle P\land \neg P} 1666:Commutativity of conjunction 1156:ex contradictione quodlibet 577:This proof was published by 1341:The Law of Non-Contradicton 231:Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory 2027: 1686:Monotonicity of entailment 1422:. Routledge. p. 171. 1170:principle of Pseudo-Scotus 36: 29: 1611: 1575:Idempotency of entailment 1418:MacFarlane, John (2021). 1383:de Swart, Harrie (2018). 1314:10.1007/978-3-319-33205-5 1283:10.1007/s11229-013-0246-8 1251:MacFarlane, John (2021). 1468:Burgess, John P (2005). 1399:Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). 1066:law of non-contradiction 1019:(or an equivalent form, 991:disjunction introduction 537:Disjunction introduction 87:"Principle of explosion" 32:Elysian Fields Quarterly 1934:Willard Van Orman Quine 1209:; Marcos, JoĂŁo (2001). 1172:(falsely attributed to 1103:Law of noncontradiction 1048:) is worthless because 797:that is not a model of 762:, there is no model of 696:{\displaystyle \Gamma } 683:only if every model of 676:{\displaystyle \Gamma } 527:{\displaystyle P\lor Q} 499:Conjunction elimination 464:Conjunction elimination 303:Symbolic representation 203:formal axiomatic system 170:according to which any 1909:Charles Sanders Peirce 1752:Hypothetical syllogism 1155: 1150: 1097:Law of excluded middle 1085:Consequentia mirabilis 1042: 975: 921: 886: 866: 846: 811: 791: 752: 717: 697: 677: 663:of a set of sentences 651: 618: 598: 560: 528: 490: 489:{\displaystyle \neg P} 455: 426: 342: 164:principle of explosion 1975:Principia Mathematica 1747:Disjunctive syllogism 1732:modus ponendo tollens 1235:Smith, Peter (2020). 1115:Paradox of entailment 1043: 987:disjunctive syllogism 976: 936:Paraconsistent logics 922: 887: 867: 847: 812: 792: 753: 718: 698: 678: 652: 619: 599: 569:Disjunctive syllogism 561: 529: 491: 456: 427: 343: 296:paraconsistent logics 268:Disjunctive syllogism 174:can be proven from a 43:Quod Libet (software) 1965:Function and Concept 1737:Constructive dilemma 1712:Material implication 1121:Reductio ad absurdum 1109:Paraconsistent logic 1023: 996:reductio ad absurdum 950: 942:-forming operators. 931:Paraconsistent logic 896: 876: 856: 821: 801: 766: 727: 707: 687: 667: 660:semantic consequence 641: 608: 588: 550: 512: 477: 445: 407: 317: 281:. Thus, there is an 156:intuitionistic logic 72:improve this article 1939:Ludwig Wittgenstein 1742:Destructive dilemma 1570:Well-formed formula 1151:ex falso quodlibet 348:For any statements 285:of true statements. 279:well-formed formula 195:William of Soissons 188:deductive explosion 1884:Augustus De Morgan 1168:Also known as the 1038: 971: 917: 882: 862: 842: 807: 787: 748: 713: 693: 673: 647: 614: 594: 556: 524: 486: 451: 422: 338: 1988: 1987: 1852: 1851: 1429:978-1-315-18524-8 1323:978-3-319-33203-1 1207:Carnielli, Walter 885:{\displaystyle Q} 865:{\displaystyle Q} 810:{\displaystyle Q} 716:{\displaystyle P} 650:{\displaystyle P} 629:Semantic argument 617:{\displaystyle Q} 597:{\displaystyle P} 575: 574: 559:{\displaystyle Q} 454:{\displaystyle P} 207:Russell's paradox 148: 147: 140: 122: 16:(Redirected from 2018: 1924:Henry M. Sheffer 1914:Bertrand Russell 1879:Richard Dedekind 1763: 1707:De Morgan's laws 1681:Noncontradiction 1623:Classical logics 1617: 1514: 1507: 1500: 1491: 1484: 1483: 1465: 1459: 1458: 1440: 1434: 1433: 1415: 1406: 1404: 1396: 1390: 1388: 1380: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1353: 1344: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1264: 1258: 1256: 1248: 1242: 1240: 1232: 1226: 1225: 1215: 1203: 1186: 1183: 1177: 1166: 1160: 1158: 1144: 1047: 1045: 1044: 1039: 1009:metamathematical 980: 978: 977: 972: 926: 924: 923: 918: 891: 889: 888: 883: 871: 869: 868: 863: 851: 849: 848: 843: 816: 814: 813: 808: 796: 794: 793: 788: 757: 755: 754: 749: 722: 720: 719: 714: 702: 700: 699: 694: 682: 680: 679: 674: 656: 654: 653: 648: 623: 621: 620: 615: 603: 601: 600: 595: 565: 563: 562: 557: 533: 531: 530: 525: 495: 493: 492: 487: 460: 458: 457: 452: 431: 429: 428: 423: 387: 347: 345: 344: 339: 219:Abraham Fraenkel 143: 136: 132: 129: 123: 121: 80: 56: 48: 21: 2026: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2006:Classical logic 1991: 1990: 1989: 1984: 1960:Begriffsschrift 1948: 1944:Jan Ɓukasiewicz 1864:Bernard Bolzano 1848: 1819:Double negation 1807: 1778:Double negation 1761: 1695: 1671:Excluded middle 1654: 1618: 1609: 1523: 1521:Classical logic 1518: 1488: 1487: 1480: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1455: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1430: 1417: 1416: 1409: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1367: 1365: 1355: 1354: 1347: 1335: 1331: 1324: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1213: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1167: 1163: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1081: 1021: 1020: 1005: 983:Proof-theoretic 948: 947: 944:Model-theoretic 933: 894: 893: 874: 873: 854: 853: 819: 818: 799: 798: 764: 763: 725: 724: 705: 704: 685: 684: 665: 664: 639: 638: 631: 606: 605: 586: 585: 548: 547: 510: 509: 475: 474: 443: 442: 405: 404: 374: 369: 315: 314: 305: 182:(including its 160:logical systems 152:classical logic 144: 133: 127: 124: 81: 79: 69: 57: 46: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2024: 2022: 2014: 2013: 2008: 2003: 1993: 1992: 1986: 1985: 1983: 1982: 1977: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1956: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1941: 1936: 1931: 1926: 1921: 1919:Ernst Schröder 1916: 1911: 1906: 1904:Giuseppe Peano 1901: 1896: 1891: 1886: 1881: 1876: 1871: 1866: 1860: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1847: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1815: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1806: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1769: 1767: 1760: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1729: 1724: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1703: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1694: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1678: 1673: 1668: 1662: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1626: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1612: 1610: 1608: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1560:Truth function 1557: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1531: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1519: 1517: 1516: 1509: 1502: 1494: 1486: 1485: 1478: 1460: 1453: 1445:Symbolic Logic 1435: 1428: 1407: 1391: 1375: 1345: 1337:Priest, Graham 1329: 1322: 1296: 1259: 1243: 1227: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1178: 1161: 1138: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1124: 1118: 1112: 1106: 1100: 1094: 1088: 1087:– Clavius' Law 1080: 1077: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1004: 1001: 970: 967: 964: 961: 958: 955: 932: 929: 916: 913: 910: 907: 904: 901: 881: 861: 852:is a model of 841: 838: 835: 832: 829: 826: 806: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 732: 712: 703:is a model of 692: 672: 646: 630: 627: 613: 593: 573: 572: 566: 555: 545: 541: 540: 534: 523: 520: 517: 507: 503: 502: 496: 485: 482: 472: 468: 467: 461: 450: 440: 436: 435: 432: 421: 418: 415: 412: 402: 398: 397: 394: 391: 382:symbolic logic 378:Lewis argument 373: 370: 337: 334: 331: 328: 325: 322: 313: 309:symbolic logic 304: 301: 287: 286: 271: 263: 252: 249: 223:Thoralf Skolem 158:, and similar 146: 145: 60: 58: 51: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2023: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2004: 2002: 1999: 1998: 1996: 1981: 1978: 1976: 1973: 1971: 1968: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1958: 1957: 1955: 1951: 1945: 1942: 1940: 1937: 1935: 1932: 1930: 1929:Alfred Tarski 1927: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1915: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1902: 1900: 1897: 1895: 1892: 1890: 1889:Gottlob Frege 1887: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1877: 1875: 1872: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1859: 1855: 1845: 1842: 1840: 1837: 1835: 1834:Biconditional 1832: 1830: 1827: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1814: 1810: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1793:Biconditional 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1768: 1764: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1750: 1748: 1745: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1727:modus tollens 1725: 1723: 1720: 1718: 1717:Transposition 1715: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1702: 1698: 1692: 1689: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1635:Propositional 1633: 1631: 1628: 1627: 1625: 1621: 1616: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1590:Associativity 1588: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1515: 1510: 1508: 1503: 1501: 1496: 1495: 1492: 1481: 1479:9780195325928 1475: 1471: 1464: 1461: 1456: 1454:9780486601700 1450: 1446: 1439: 1436: 1431: 1425: 1421: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1402: 1395: 1392: 1386: 1379: 1376: 1363: 1362:Plus Magazine 1359: 1352: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1333: 1330: 1325: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1300: 1297: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1263: 1260: 1254: 1247: 1244: 1238: 1231: 1228: 1223: 1219: 1212: 1208: 1202: 1199: 1192: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1165: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1140: 1133: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1076: 1074: 1073:minimal logic 1069: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1056:would become 1055: 1051: 1035: 1029: 1026: 1018: 1015:which proves 1014: 1010: 1002: 1000: 998: 997: 992: 988: 984: 965: 959: 956: 945: 941: 937: 930: 928: 911: 905: 902: 879: 859: 836: 830: 827: 804: 781: 775: 772: 761: 742: 736: 733: 710: 662: 661: 644: 637:. A sentence 636: 628: 626: 611: 591: 582: 580: 570: 567: 553: 546: 543: 542: 538: 535: 521: 518: 515: 508: 505: 504: 500: 497: 483: 473: 470: 469: 465: 462: 448: 441: 438: 437: 433: 419: 413: 410: 403: 400: 399: 395: 392: 389: 388: 385: 383: 379: 376:Below is the 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 335: 332: 329: 323: 320: 312: 310: 302: 300: 298: 297: 292: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 264: 261: 257: 253: 250: 247: 246: 245: 243: 239: 234: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215:Ernst Zermelo 212: 211:Gottlob Frege 208: 204: 200: 199:inconsistency 196: 191: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176:contradiction 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 142: 139: 131: 120: 117: 113: 110: 106: 103: 99: 96: 92: 89: â€“  88: 84: 83:Find sources: 77: 73: 67: 66: 61:This article 59: 55: 50: 49: 44: 40: 33: 19: 1899:Hugh MacColl 1874:Georg Cantor 1869:George Boole 1766:Introduction 1722:modus ponens 1690: 1650:Higher-order 1645:Second-order 1595:Distribution 1555:Truth tables 1469: 1463: 1444: 1438: 1419: 1400: 1394: 1384: 1378: 1366:. Retrieved 1361: 1340: 1332: 1305: 1299: 1277:(18): 4023. 1274: 1268: 1262: 1255:. Routledge. 1252: 1246: 1236: 1230: 1221: 1217: 1201: 1181: 1169: 1164: 1142: 1070: 1049: 1006: 994: 934: 658: 635:model theory 632: 583: 576: 393:Proposition 377: 375: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 306: 295: 288: 282: 274: 259: 255: 235: 192: 187: 163: 149: 134: 125: 115: 108: 101: 94: 82: 70:Please help 65:verification 62: 1844:Disjunction 1839:Conjunction 1824:Existential 1812:Elimination 1803:Disjunction 1798:Conjunction 1783:Existential 1640:First-order 1565:Truth value 1535:Quantifiers 1387:. Springer. 1368:January 14, 1241:Chapter 17. 1174:Duns Scotus 1091:Dialetheism 940:subcontrary 579:C. I. Lewis 396:Derivation 180:proposition 128:August 2020 2011:Principles 1995:Categories 1894:Kurt Gödel 1757:Absorption 1659:Principles 1545:Connective 1257:Chapter 7. 1193:References 1127:Trivialism 1054:statements 760:A fortiori 227:set theory 98:newspapers 1829:Universal 1788:Universal 1691:Explosion 1676:Bivalence 1605:Soundness 1550:Tautology 1540:Predicate 1224:: 89–109. 1036:ϕ 1033:¬ 1030:∧ 1027:ϕ 966:ϕ 963:¬ 957:ϕ 909:¬ 906:∧ 834:¬ 831:∧ 779:¬ 776:∧ 740:¬ 737:∧ 691:Γ 671:Γ 519:∨ 481:¬ 417:¬ 414:∧ 333:⊢ 327:¬ 283:explosion 172:statement 39:Quodlibet 1773:Negation 1600:Validity 1580:Logicism 1270:Synthese 1079:See also 1058:theorems 434:Premise 368:is true. 360:and not- 242:unicorns 184:negation 18:Ex Falso 1528:General 1405:p. 139. 1291:9276566 872:. Thus 293:called 201:) in a 166:is the 112:scholar 1857:People 1476:  1451:  1426:  1389:p. 47. 1320:  1289:  1013:theory 993:, and 571:(4,3) 238:lemons 221:, and 162:, the 114:  107:  100:  93:  85:  1953:Works 1700:Rules 1287:S2CID 1214:(PDF) 1147:Latin 1134:Notes 1062:truth 1003:Usage 657:is a 390:Step 372:Proof 356:, if 291:logic 119:JSTOR 105:books 1630:Term 1474:ISBN 1449:ISBN 1424:ISBN 1370:2017 1318:ISBN 1052:its 1007:The 539:(2) 501:(1) 466:(1) 352:and 91:news 1310:doi 1279:doi 1275:190 1050:all 307:In 275:not 168:law 150:In 74:by 1997:: 1410:^ 1360:. 1348:^ 1316:. 1285:. 1273:. 1220:. 1216:. 1176:). 1149:: 1075:. 999:. 989:, 927:. 758:. 384:. 270:). 260:or 256:or 233:. 217:, 213:, 190:. 154:, 1513:e 1506:t 1499:v 1482:. 1457:. 1432:. 1372:. 1326:. 1312:: 1293:. 1281:: 1222:1 1017:⊄ 969:} 960:, 954:{ 915:) 912:P 903:P 900:( 880:Q 860:Q 840:) 837:P 828:P 825:( 805:Q 785:) 782:P 773:P 770:( 746:) 743:P 734:P 731:( 711:P 645:P 612:Q 592:P 554:Q 544:5 522:Q 516:P 506:4 484:P 471:3 449:P 439:2 420:P 411:P 401:1 366:Q 362:P 358:P 354:Q 350:P 336:Q 330:P 324:, 321:P 141:) 135:( 130:) 126:( 116:· 109:· 102:· 95:· 68:. 45:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Ex Falso
Elysian Fields Quarterly
Quodlibet
Quod Libet (software)

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Principle of explosion"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
classical logic
intuitionistic logic
logical systems
law
statement
contradiction
proposition
negation
William of Soissons
inconsistency
formal axiomatic system
Russell's paradox
Gottlob Frege
Ernst Zermelo
Abraham Fraenkel

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑