Knowledge

Edge dominating set

Source đź“ť

17: 118:. A minimum maximal matching is a minimum edge dominating set; Figure (b) is an example of a minimum maximal matching. A minimum edge dominating set is not necessarily a minimum maximal matching, as illustrated in Figure (a); however, given a minimum edge dominating set 265: 225: 71:
is a smallest edge dominating set. Figures (a) and (b) are examples of minimum edge dominating sets (it can be checked that there is no edge dominating set of size 2 for this graph).
186:
show that finding a better than (7/6)-approximation is NP-hard. Schmied & Viehmann proved that the Problem is UGC-hard to approximate to within any constant better than 3/2.
429: 169:
can be at worst 2 times as large as a smallest maximal matching, and a smallest maximal matching has the same size as the smallest edge dominating set.
275: 375:
Richard Schmied & Claus Viehmann (2012), "Approximating edge dominating set in dense graphs", Theor. Comput. Sci. 414(1), pp. 92-99.
172:
Also the edge-weighted version of the problem can be approximated within factor 2, but the algorithm is considerably more complicated (
165:
with approximation factor 2: find any maximal matching. A maximal matching is an edge dominating set; furthermore, a maximal matching
288:
Edge dominating set (decision version) is discussed under the dominating set problem, which is the problem GT2 in Appendix A1.1.
341:
Fujito, Toshihiro; Nagamochi, Hiroshi (2002), "A 2-approximation algorithm for the minimum weight edge dominating set problem",
196:
Ausiello, Giorgio; Crescenzi, Pierluigi; Gambosi, Giorgio; Kann, Viggo; Marchetti-Spaccamela, Alberto; Protasi, Marco (2003),
424: 115: 162: 311: 221: 198:
Complexity and Approximation: Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Their Approximability Properties
386: 316: 329: 299: 245: 209:
Minimum edge dominating set (optimisation version) is the problem GT3 in Appendix B (page 370).
271: 212:
Minimum maximal matching (optimisation version) is the problem GT10 in Appendix B (page 374).
350: 321: 261: 257: 237: 138:
Determining whether there is an edge dominating set of a given size for a given graph is an
108: 151: 406: 400: 111:
is always an edge dominating set. Figures (b) and (d) are examples of maximal matchings.
90: 80: 354: 291:
Minimum maximal matching (decision version) is the problem GT10 in Appendix A1.1.
418: 249: 155: 25: 16: 363: 139: 390: 368:
Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
241: 94: 114:
Furthermore, the size of a minimum edge dominating set equals the size of a
64:. Figures (a)–(d) are examples of edge dominating sets (thick red lines). 333: 143: 385:
Pierluigi Crescenzi, Viggo Kann, MagnĂşs HalldĂłrsson, Marek Karpinski,
267:
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
325: 142:
problem (and therefore finding a minimum edge dominating set is an
15: 302:; Gavril, Fanica (1980), "Edge dominating sets in graphs", 150:
show that the problem is NP-complete even in the case of a
226:"Approximation hardness of edge dominating set problems" 122:, it is easy to find a minimum maximal matching with | 183: 154:with maximum degree 3, and also in the case of a 147: 127: 173: 8: 81:Dominating set § Independent domination 60:. An edge dominating set is also known as a 391:"A compendium of NP optimization problems" 315: 364:"Edge dominating and hypomatchable sets" 134:Algorithms and computational complexity 430:Computational problems in graph theory 177: 230:Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 7: 56:is adjacent to at least one edge in 304:SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 161:There is a simple polynomial-time 14: 20:Examples of edge dominating sets. 184:ChlebĂ­k & ChlebĂ­ková (2006) 148:Yannakakis & Gavril (1980) 1: 355:10.1016/S0166-218X(00)00383-8 343:Discrete Applied Mathematics 128:Yannakakis & Gavril 1980 52:such that every edge not in 401:Minimum Edge Dominating Set 174:Fujito & Nagamochi 2002 85:An edge dominating set for 69:minimum edge dominating set 446: 78: 242:10.1007/s10878-006-7908-0 407:Minimum Maximal Matching 116:minimum maximal matching 163:approximation algorithm 158:with maximum degree 3. 21: 362:Parekh, Ojas (2002), 79:Further information: 19: 425:NP-complete problems 126:| edges (see, e.g., 300:Yannakakis, Mihalis 220:ChlebĂ­k, Miroslav; 62:line dominating set 30:edge dominating set 370:, pp. 287–291 104:) and vice versa. 22: 387:Gerhard Woeginger 277:978-0-7167-1045-5 262:Johnson, David S. 258:Garey, Michael R. 222:ChlebĂ­ková, Janka 437: 371: 357: 336: 319: 280: 270:, W.H. Freeman, 252: 201: 109:maximal matching 445: 444: 440: 439: 438: 436: 435: 434: 415: 414: 382: 361: 340: 326:10.1137/0138030 317:10.1.1.477.4278 298: 278: 256: 219: 195: 192: 152:bipartite graph 136: 83: 77: 12: 11: 5: 443: 441: 433: 432: 427: 417: 416: 413: 412: 411: 410: 404: 395: 394: 381: 380:External links 378: 377: 376: 373: 359: 349:(3): 199–207, 338: 310:(3): 364–372, 295: 294: 293: 292: 289: 283: 282: 276: 254: 236:(3): 279–290, 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 204: 203: 191: 188: 135: 132: 91:dominating set 76: 73: 44:) is a subset 36: = ( 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 442: 431: 428: 426: 423: 422: 420: 408: 405: 402: 399: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 384: 383: 379: 374: 369: 365: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 318: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 290: 287: 286: 285: 284: 279: 273: 269: 268: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 218: 217: 211: 208: 207: 206: 205: 199: 194: 193: 189: 187: 185: 181: 179: 175: 170: 168: 164: 159: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 133: 131: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 110: 105: 103: 99: 96: 92: 88: 82: 74: 72: 70: 65: 63: 59: 55: 51: 48: âŠ†  47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 18: 367: 346: 342: 307: 303: 266: 233: 229: 197: 182: 171: 166: 160: 156:planar graph 137: 123: 119: 113: 106: 101: 97: 86: 84: 68: 66: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 32:for a graph 29: 26:graph theory 23: 178:Parekh 2002 140:NP-complete 419:Categories 200:, Springer 190:References 146:problem). 95:line graph 75:Properties 312:CiteSeerX 389:(2000), 264:(1979), 224:(2006), 93:for its 334:2100648 250:8024435 144:NP-hard 40:,  332:  314:  274:  248:  330:JSTOR 246:S2CID 89:is a 28:, an 272:ISBN 107:Any 351:doi 347:118 322:doi 238:doi 180:). 130:). 24:In 421:: 366:, 345:, 328:, 320:, 308:38 306:, 260:; 244:, 234:11 232:, 228:, 176:; 67:A 409:. 403:, 393:: 372:. 358:. 353:: 337:. 324:: 281:. 253:. 240:: 202:. 167:M 124:D 120:D 102:G 100:( 98:L 87:G 58:D 54:D 50:E 46:D 42:E 38:V 34:G

Index


graph theory
Dominating set § Independent domination
dominating set
line graph
maximal matching
minimum maximal matching
Yannakakis & Gavril 1980
NP-complete
NP-hard
Yannakakis & Gavril (1980)
bipartite graph
planar graph
approximation algorithm
Fujito & Nagamochi 2002
Parekh 2002
Chlebík & Chlebíková (2006)
Chlebíková, Janka
"Approximation hardness of edge dominating set problems"
doi
10.1007/s10878-006-7908-0
S2CID
8024435
Garey, Michael R.
Johnson, David S.
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
ISBN
978-0-7167-1045-5
Yannakakis, Mihalis
CiteSeerX

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑