Knowledge

Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery

Source 📝

198:, as well as trademark and copyright applications. On average, more than 300 patents per year are issued by the U.S. Patent Office with Fitch Even listed as the legal representative. The firm also filed over 470 trademark applications in 2006. 170: 179: 401: 381: 332: 396: 376: 391: 239: 83: 339:
Fitch Even was ranked 33 among U.S. law firms for highest number of trademark applications filed, pg. 4. Retrieved on July 5, 2007
166: 122: 173:-based mathematical method used in monitoring a patient's heart was patentable subject matter. The Federal Circuit relied on 361: 217: 125:
and in at least one state in the U.S.) and have backgrounds in high technology or the chemical and life sciences.
386: 162: 357: 184: 212: 102: 326: 311: 195: 284: 255: 191: 150: 207: 154: 25: 236: 336: 296: 243: 118: 271: 370: 114: 138: 82: 146: 142: 110: 98: 106: 153:, and related commercial disputes. The firm served as counsel in the 134: 133:
Fitch Even's litigation practice involves all areas of IP including
117:
and an international client base. Most of the firm's attorneys are
81: 317:
Three-year average (2004-2006), pg. 3. Retrieved on July 5, 2007
298:
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group
352: 74: 105:(IP) and technology-related law. The firm originated in 257:
Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc., v. Corazonix Corp
183:, that expanded patentable subject matter to include 70: 62: 54: 43: 32: 21: 180:State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group 8: 113:in 1859, and now has offices throughout the 16: 15: 121:(i.e., authorized to practice before the 302:Cornell Law. Retrieved on July 5, 2007 229: 169:. The firm successfully argued that a 91:Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP 17:Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP 7: 272:"Arrhythmia Research v. Corazonix" 14: 167:Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 123:U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 119:registered U.S. patent attorneys 402:1859 establishments in Illinois 382:Intellectual property law firms 237:Lexis Nexis, Martindale-Hubbell 44: 33: 1: 397:Law firms established in 1859 362:LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell 161:that dealt with the issue of 377:Biopharmaceutical law firms 190:The firm also prepares and 418: 392:Law firms based in Chicago 287:Retrieved on July 5, 2007 261:Retrieved on July 5, 2007 246:Retrieved on July 5, 2007 163:patentable subject matter 159:Arrhythmia v. Corazonix 47: of attorneys 177:in a subsequent case, 87: 353:Official Firm Website 194:foreign and domestic 103:intellectual property 85: 58:Intellectual Property 36: of offices 330:, Trademark Insider. 101:that specializes in 55:Major practice areas 196:patent applications 18: 335:2007-09-28 at the 328:Annual Report 2006 242:2007-09-27 at the 151:unfair competition 88: 80: 79: 75:www.fitcheven.com 63:Date founded 26:Chicago, Illinois 409: 387:Patent law firms 340: 324: 318: 313:Top Patent Firms 309: 303: 300:, 149 F.3d 1368. 294: 288: 282: 276: 275: 268: 262: 259:, 958 F.2d 1053. 253: 247: 234: 185:business methods 97:), is a premium 86:Downtown Chicago 46: 35: 19: 417: 416: 412: 411: 410: 408: 407: 406: 367: 366: 349: 344: 343: 337:Wayback Machine 325: 321: 310: 306: 295: 291: 283: 279: 270: 269: 265: 254: 250: 244:Wayback Machine 235: 231: 226: 218:San Luis Obispo 204: 131: 12: 11: 5: 415: 413: 405: 404: 399: 394: 389: 384: 379: 369: 368: 365: 364: 355: 348: 347:External links 345: 342: 341: 319: 304: 289: 277: 263: 248: 228: 227: 225: 222: 221: 220: 215: 210: 203: 200: 130: 127: 78: 77: 72: 68: 67: 64: 60: 59: 56: 52: 51: 48: 41: 40: 37: 30: 29: 23: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 414: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 374: 372: 363: 359: 356: 354: 351: 350: 346: 338: 334: 331: 329: 323: 320: 316: 314: 308: 305: 301: 299: 293: 290: 286: 281: 278: 273: 267: 264: 260: 258: 252: 249: 245: 241: 238: 233: 230: 223: 219: 216: 214: 211: 209: 206: 205: 201: 199: 197: 193: 188: 186: 182: 181: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 128: 126: 124: 120: 116: 115:United States 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 84: 76: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 42: 38: 31: 27: 24: 20: 327: 322: 312: 307: 297: 292: 280: 266: 256: 251: 232: 189: 178: 174: 158: 157:patent case 139:trade secret 132: 94: 93:, (known as 90: 89: 22:Headquarters 315:, IP Today. 165:before the 371:Categories 192:prosecutes 175:Arrhythmia 95:Fitch Even 213:San Diego 147:copyright 143:trademark 333:Archived 240:Archived 171:software 155:landmark 129:Practice 111:Illinois 99:law firm 358:Profile 208:Chicago 202:Offices 107:Chicago 71:Website 135:patent 28:, U.S. 360:from 285:Ibid. 224:Notes 66:1859 187:. 45:No. 34:No. 373:: 149:, 145:, 141:, 137:, 109:, 50:50 274:. 39:5

Index

Chicago, Illinois
www.fitcheven.com

law firm
intellectual property
Chicago
Illinois
United States
registered U.S. patent attorneys
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
patent
trade secret
trademark
copyright
unfair competition
landmark
patentable subject matter
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
software
State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group
business methods
prosecutes
patent applications
Chicago
San Diego
San Luis Obispo
Lexis Nexis, Martindale-Hubbell
Archived
Wayback Machine
Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc., v. Corazonix Corp, 958 F.2d 1053.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.