383:
can see that the ace and queen have something in common in that they are both "off" by a half point. The jack and ten are also both "off" by a quarter point. So for example, a hand with one of each honor (A, K, Q, J, 10) would be counted as 10 HCP. Since the hard and soft values are equal (the ace and queen cancel out, and the jack and ten cancel out), there is no adjustment. On the other hand, to take an extreme example, a hand with four aces and four tens (no kings, queens, or jacks) would be counted at 16 HCP at first, but since it holds eight hard values and no soft values, it is adjusted to 19 HCP.
951:
containing 11 HCP and 5–4–2–2 shape would qualify for an opening bid because the resultant number would be 20 (11 + 5 + 4) whereas 11 HCP and 4–4–3–2 shape would not (11 + 4 + 4 = 19). This method gives very similar results to length points as above except for a hand containing 11 HCP and 5–3–3–2 shape which gives 19 on the Rule of 20 (insufficient to open) but 12 total points by adding 1 length point to the 11 HCP (sufficient to open). Experience and further analysis are needed to decide which is appropriate.
1476:(1981) was probably the first major book on this topic. In the introduction the authors acknowledge Jean-René Vernes as the first writer to delve into the TNT (Total Number of Tricks) Theory. This book and these authors are little known in North America. What a shame! They touch several aspects of TNT that are rarely mentioned by others. Chapter Four on Total Distribution is worth the price (if you can locate a used copy of this out-of-print book). Page 19 carries a key table that may not be printed elsewhere.
942:
A=1, KQ=1, Kx=0.5 . This formula for evaluating opening bid strength is referred to by Ron
Klinger as "Highly Cutie" : HIgh card points + LEngth count + Quick Tricks. The method attempts to improve the widely accepted 'Rule of 20' by emphasizing the importance of defensive values in a one-level opening hand, and by assigning greater value to honor cards that work together in the same suit than to honors that are split between suits.
968:
the number of cards in the suit and the number of high (honour) cards in the suit. For this purpose high cards are considered to be A, K, Q, J and 10 but the J and 10 are only to be counted if at least one of the A, K or Q are present. The resultant number determines the level at which the particular bid should be made (Klinger 1994) according to this scale:
928:
to take tricks in attack or defence. Point count or the Losing Trick Count indicate how many tricks a hand is likely to make in offence; a hand with high ODR will tend to be more distributional, with lower HCP, and take less tricks in defence than a hand with the same number of losers but a low ODR. There is no precise numerical statement of the ODR.
1451:
to which the partnership should bid. So, 15 half-losers opposite 15 half-losers leads to 19-(15+15)/2 = 4-level contract. Players already familiar with this formula will recognize the difference between 25 (total projected tricks) and 19 (projected contract level) as the number of tricks required by declarer to secure a "book", which is 6.
463:
arise because the term "points" can be used to mean either HCP, or HCP plus length points. This method, of valuing both honour cards and long suits, is suitable for use at the opening bid stage before a trump suit has been agreed. In the USA this method of combining HCP and long-card points is known as the point-count system.
787:), the partnership having the minimum 26 total points typically required for a game contract in the majors. Despite the spade suit fit, both East hands have marginal slam potential based on their 16 HCP count alone. On the top layout the control-rich East (an upgraded 17–18 HCP) should explore slam and be willing to bypass 4
826:
combinations occur. This method is particularly useful in making difficult decisions on marginal hands, especially for overcalling and in competitive bidding situations. In lieu of arithmetic addition or subtraction of HCP or distributional points, 'plus' or 'minus' valuations may be applied to influence the decision.
90:. Although 'Robertson's Rule' for bidding (the 7-5-3 count) had been in use for more than a dozen years, McCampbell sought a more "simple scale of relative values. The Pitch Scale is the easiest to remember. (Those ... who have played Auction Pitch will have no difficulty in recognizing and remembering these values.)"
1450:
Similar to basic LTC, users may employ an alternative formula to determine the appropriate contract level. The NLTC alternative formula is 19 (instead of 18 with basic LTC) minus the sum of the losers in the two hands (i.e. half the sum of the half-losers in both hands) = the suggested contract level
290:
Both East hands are exactly the same, and both West hands have the same shape, the same HCP count, and the same high cards. The only difference between the West hands is that two low red cards and one low black card have been swapped (between the heart suit and the diamond suit, and between the spade
1613:
For relatively strong hands containing long suits (e.g. an Acol 2 opener), playing tricks are defined as the number of tricks expected, with no help from partner, given that the longest suit is trumps. Thus for long suits the ace, king and queen are counted together with all cards in excess of 3 in
1446:
A typical opening bid is assumed to have 15 or fewer half-losers, or 7.5 losers, which is half a loser more compared to basic LTC. NLTC also differs from LTC in the fact that it utilises a value of 25 (instead of 24 with basic LTC) in determining the trick-taking potential of two partnering hands.
1100:
Once a trump fit has been found, this alternative (to HCP) method is used in situations where shape and fit are of more significance than HCP in determining the optimum level of a suit contract. The "losing-tricks" in a hand are added to the systemically assumed losing tricks in partners hand (7 for
775:
The table can be used as tie-breaker for estimating the slam-going potential of hands like the above two East hands. Whilst the top East hand counts 16 HCP, in terms of controls (6) it is equivalent to a hand typically 1–2 HCP stronger, whereas the bottom East hand, also counting 16 HCP, is in terms
462:
A hand comprising a 5-card suit and a 6-card suit gains points for both, i.e., 1 + 2 making 3 points in total. Other combinations are dealt with in a similar way. These distribution points (sometimes called length points) are added to the HCP to give the total point value of the hand. Confusion can
967:
The SQT evaluates an individual suit as a precursor to deciding whether, and at what level, certain bids should be made. This method is generally considered useful for making an overcall and for making a preemptive opening bid; it works for long suits i.e. 5 cards at least, as follows: Add together
927:
This concept is sometimes stated as the "Offence-Defence Ratio" (ODR) of a hand. For example, a suit KQJ10987 will take 6 tricks with this as the trump suit but maybe none in defence; it has a high ODR. If the same cards are randomly scattered through different suits, they are about equally likely
382:
Note that this scale keeps the 40 high card point system intact. The scale may seem cumbersome, but if one considers the ace and ten honors "hard" and the queen and jack honors "soft" it is much easier to accurately count high card points by using the familiar 4-3-2-1 system and then adjusting. One
1442:
Adopters of NLTC should note that all singletons, except singleton A, are counted as three half-losers (1.5 losers), and all doubletons that are missing both the A and K are counted as five half-losers (2.5 losers). Like basic LTC, no suit contains more than three losers, so with NLTC, three small
941:
Add together the number of HCP in the hand, and the number of cards in the two longest suits, and the number of quick tricks in the hand. If the resultant number is 22 or higher, then an opening bid is suggested . In 3rd seat the requirement may be lowered to 19. Quick tricks are: AK=2, AQ=1.5,
522:
An alternative approach is to create a distributional point count of a hand to be added to HCP simply by adding the combined length of the two longest suits, subtracting the length of the shortest suit, and subtracting a further five. On this basis 4333 hands score -1 and all other shapes score a
1503:
In 2002, Anders
Wirgren called the accuracy of the "law" into question, saying it works on only 40% of deals. However, Larry Cohen remains convinced it is a useful guideline, especially when adjustments are used properly. Mendelson (1998) finds that it is "accurate to within one trick on the vast
1223:
xx, has 7 losers (1+2+2+2=7). To calculate how high to bid, responder adds the number of losers in their hand to the assumed number in opener's hand (7). The total number of losers is subtracted from 24. The answer is the total number of tricks available to the partnership, and this should be the
982:
An alternative way to look at this is that the bid should be to the level of the number of tricks equal to the SQT number. This method was originally proposed as a way of enabling overcalls to be made with relatively few HCP but with little risk. It can also be used to determine whether a hand is
552:
The control count is the sum of the controls where aces are valued as two controls, kings as one control and queens and jacks as zero. This control count can be used as "tie-breakers" for hands evaluated as marginal by their HCP count. Hands with the same shape and the same HCP can have markedly
531:
When intending to make a bid in a suit and there is no agreed upon trump suit, add high card points and length points to get the total point value of one's hand. When intending to raise an agreed trump suit, add high card points and shortness points. When making a bid in notrump with intent to
294:
With a total of 34 HCP in the combined hands, based on the above-mentioned HCP-requirement for slam, most partnerships would end in a small slam (12 tricks) contract. Yet, the left layout produces 13 tricks in notrump, whilst the right layout on a diamond lead would fail to produce more than 10
118:
Evaluating a hand on this basis takes due account of the fact that there are 10 HCP in each suit and therefore 40 in the complete deck of cards. An average hand contains one quarter of the total, i.e. 10 HCP. The method has the dual benefits of simplicity and practicality, especially in notrump
1513:
Hands with relatively solid long suits have a trick taking potential not easily measured by the basic pointcount methods (e.g. a hand containing 13 spades will take all 13 tricks if spades are trumps, but will only score 19 on the point count method, 10 HCP + 9 length point). For such hands,
299:
in the high card values: in the bottom layout the combined 20 HCP in spades and diamonds results in only five tricks. Because such duplication can often not be detected during bidding, the high card point method of hand evaluation, when used alone, provides only a preliminary estimate of the
950:
Add together the number of HCP in the hand, and the number of cards in the two longest suits. If the resultant number is 20 or higher and most of the high cards are in the long suits, then an opening bid is suggested (the choice of which bid requires further analysis). As an example, a hand
690:
In the above examples, both West hands are the same, and both East hands have the same shape and HCP (16). Yet, the layout above represents a solid slam (12 tricks) in spades, whilst the layout below will fail to produce 12 tricks. The difference between the East hands becomes apparent when
548:
The control count is a supplementary method that is mainly used in combination with HCP count to determine the trick-taking potential of fitting hands, in particular to investigate slam potential. The use of control count addresses the fact that for suit contracts, aces and kings tend to be
1468:
For shapely hands where a trump fit has been agreed, the combined length of the trump suit can be more significant than points or HCP in deciding on the level of the final contract. It is of most value in competitive bidding situations where the HCP are divided roughly equally between the
825:
Certain combinations of cards have higher or lower trick taking potential than the simple point count methods would suggest. Proponents of this idea suggest that HCP should be deducted from hands where negative combinations occur. Similarly, additional points might be added where positive
341:
To adjust for aces, Goren recommended deducting one HCP for a hand without any aces and adding one for holding four aces. Some adjust for tens by adding 1/2 HCP for each. Alternatively, some treat aces and tens as a group and add one HCP if the hand contains three or more aces and tens;
439:
In order to improve the accuracy of the bidding process, the high card point count is supplemented by the evaluation of unbalanced or shapely hands using additional simple arithmetic methods. Two approaches are common – evaluation of suit length and evaluation of suit shortness.
1086:)). At lower levels it is harder to be as precise but Crowhust & Kambites advise "With a good fit bid aggressively but with a misfit be cautious". Some of the methods that follow are designed to use arithmetic in the evaluation of hands that fit with partner's.
1671:
compatible with the bidding. This means that in order to reach an informed decision in, for example, deciding whether a hand is worth an invitation to game or slam, a player should 'visualise' the most balanced distribution with the minimum HCP partner might have
1402:
Bernard Magee also points out that the LTC can overvalue doubletons. A hand with two doubletons will usually have more immediate losers than one with a singleton and 3 cards in the other suit. The older "shortage points" method values the second hand type higher.
772:. Rosenkranz defined "the expected number of controls in balanced hands" at specific HCP counts as 'control-neutral' in a table similar to the consolidation shown on the left; having more controls is deemed 'control-rich' and having less is 'control-weak'.
1417:
Extending these thoughts, most experts agree that basic LTC undervalues Aces and overvalues Queens. In addition, many believe that worthless singletons and doubletons are generally overvalued. Recent insights on these issues have led to the
518:
This method uses both lengths and shortages in all situations. The hand scores two shortage points for a void and one for a singleton, and this total is added to the usual length count: one point is added for each card in a suit beyond four.
1708:. A minimum hand compatible with the bidding would have no more than 12 HCP, and be relatively balanced (i.e. 5332). The hand would be perfect if partner's points were solely located in spades and diamond. So a perfect minimum would be:
1447:
Hence, in NLTC the expected number of tricks equates to 25 minus the sum of the losers in the two hands (i.e. half the sum of the half-losers in both hands). So, 15 half-losers opposite 15 half-losers leads to 25-(15+15)/2 = 10 tricks.
1428:, May 2003). For more precision, this method utilizes the concept of half-losers and, more important, distinguishes between 'Ace-losers', 'King-losers' and 'Queen-losers.' Considering only the three highest ranking cards in each suit:
145:
A simple justification for 37 HCP being suitable for a grand slam is that it is the lowest number that guarantees the partnership holding all the aces. Similarly 33 HCP is the lowest number that guarantees at least three aces.
52:, fit with partner, quality of suits and quality of the whole hand. The methods range from basic to complex, requiring partners to have the same understandings and agreements about their application in their bidding system.
41:. Key to this process is that players evaluate and re-evaluate the trick-taking potential of their hands as the auction proceeds and additional information about partner's hand and the opponent's hands becomes available.
1398:
of the hand believing that the basic method undervalues an ace but overvalues a queen and undervalues short honor combinations such as Qx or a singleton king. Also it places no value on cards jack or lower.
798:
Having determined the degree of interest in exploring slam possibilities, the methods and conventions to determine which controls (aces, kings and even queens) are held by the partnership include: the
3677:
2617:
1062:
with the auction shown on the left, they point out that the bidding indicates at least 6/3 in spades and 5/3 in diamonds. If partner has 3 aces (easily discovered), a grand slam (13 tricks: 6
691:
conducting a control count: in the top layout East has two aces and two kings for a total of six controls, whilst in the bottom layout has one ace and two kings for a total of four controls.
119:
contracts. Most bidding systems are based upon the premise that a better than average hand is required to open the bidding; 12 HCP is generally considered the minimum for most opening bids.
425:* Bergen ace = 4.5 ÷ 1.5 = 3 Four Aces Count * Bergen king = 3.0 ÷ 1.5 = 2 Four Aces Count * Bergen queen = 1.5 ÷ 1.5 = 1 Four Aces Count * Bergen jack = .75 ÷ 1.5 = ½ Four Aces Count
1101:
an opening bid of 1 of a suit) and the resultant number is deducted from 24; the net figure is the number of tricks a partnership can expect to win when playing in the agreed trump suit.
127:
The combined HCP count between two balanced hands is generally considered to be a good indication, all else being equal, of the number of tricks likely to be made by the partnership. The
899:
Certain combinations of cards are better in defence and others are more valuable in attack (i.e. as declarer). There is some overlap with the concept of negative and positive points.
1648:
This statistically derived method for evaluating
Contract Bridge hands was developed by Zar Petkov. It attempts to account for many of the factors outlined above in a numerical way.
149:
Although mostly effective for evaluating the combined trick-taking potential of two balanced hands played in notrump, even in this area of applicability the HCP is not infallible.
991:
Paraphrasing
Crowhurst and Kambites (1992), "Experts often sail into an unbeatable slam with only 25 HCP whereas it would never occur to most players to proceed beyond game".
1729:
Such a perfect minimum would give a solid slam in spades whereas reliance on HCP would not indicate a slam possibility. This is the advantage of the 'visualisation' method.
549:
undervalued in the standard 4–3–2–1 HCP scale; aces and kings allow declarer better control over the hands and can prevent the opponents from retaining or gaining the lead.
540:
The basic point-count system does not solve all evaluation problems and in certain circumstances is supplemented by refinements to the HCP count or by additional methods.
1232:
partner jumps to game with no more than 7 losers in hand and a fit with partner's heart suit (3 if playing 5-card majors) ... 7 + 7 = 14 subtract from 24 = 10 tricks.
101:
in the
Fifties, and now known simply as the high-card point (HCP) count, this basic evaluation method assigns numeric values to the top four honour cards as follows:
2610:
386:
Bergen's “computer” scale appears to be identical to the “high card value of the Four Aces System” found on the front inside cover and on page 5 of the 1935 book,
338:
The 4-3-2-1 high card point evaluation has been found to statistically undervalue aces and tens and alternatives have been devised to increase a hand's HCP value.
1078:) is likely. This grand slam can easily be bid despite the partnership holding around 29 HCP only (12 in hand above plus 17 in the hand bidding the jump shift (1
3803:
4202:
3798:
3698:
4238:
4102:
4097:
3838:
3813:
3808:
3768:
3753:
3718:
3708:
2603:
4457:
4233:
3843:
3743:
3723:
3703:
855:
The next suit above RHO's suit when overcalling (unless a very good suit) which gives opponents information but does not cut into their bidding space.
4447:
4017:
3828:
3823:
3793:
3788:
3783:
3748:
3728:
3713:
1484:"On every hand of bridge, the total number of tricks available is equal to, or very close to, the total number of cards in each side's longest suit"
3864:
3818:
3773:
3763:
3758:
3733:
422:
version of the progression. Dividing Bergen's numbers by 1.5 produces exactly the same numbers published by the Four Aces seven decades earlier:
4076:
3833:
3778:
3738:
1656:
A key differentiator between the bidding effectiveness of experts versus laymen is the use of hand visualisation during all stages of bidding.
300:
trick-taking potential of the combined hands and must be supplemented by other means for improved accuracy, particularly for unbalanced hands.
4566:
4012:
2533:
2377:
1976:
791:
in doing so, whilst on the bottom layout the control-weak East (a downgraded 12–13 HCP) should be more cautious and be prepared to stop in 4
1868:
448:
At its simplest it is considered that long suits have a value beyond the HCP held: this can be turned into numbers on the following scale:
86:(page 26), the 4-3-2-1 count for honours was not established by computer analysis (as is sometimes rumoured) but was derived from the game
4601:
4397:
2317:
2063:
2026:
362:
Marty Bergen claims that with the help of computers, bridge theorists have devised a more accurate valuation of the honors as follows:
4608:
4437:
4312:
1530:
Quick tricks are similar to, but not the same as, Honor Tricks in the
Culbertson system. They are calculated suit by suit as follows:
4639:
2944:
2740:
2585:
2517:
2505:
2479:
2448:
2396:
2361:
2297:
2270:
2244:
2232:
2210:
2165:
2143:
2076:
2039:
2002:
1957:
318:
49:
45:
37:
In contract bridge, various bidding systems have been devised to enable partners to describe their hands so that they may reach the
32:
1104:
The basic method assumes that an ace will never be a loser, nor will a king in a 2+ card suit, nor a queen in a 3+ card suit, thus
496:
When the supporting hand holds four or more trumps, thereby having more spare trumps for ruffing, shortness is valued as follows:
4733:
3869:
3220:
2184:
97:
Point Count when popularized by him in the early
Thirties and then the Goren Point Count when re-popularized by Work's disciple
4472:
4192:
4187:
4162:
4157:
4032:
4027:
3962:
3498:
2068:
2031:
4467:
4332:
4322:
4262:
4207:
4177:
4172:
3859:
3672:
3280:
4327:
4587:
4526:
4182:
3285:
1203:
suits longer than three cards are judged according to the three highest cards; no suit may have more than 3 losing tricks.
4357:
4257:
4152:
4452:
4387:
4367:
4272:
4022:
4007:
3972:
3957:
3523:
3181:
475:
potential as represented by short suits becomes more significant than long suits. Accordingly, in a method devised by
1678:
your hand is worth an invitation to game (or slam) if this perfect minimum holding for partner will make it a laydown
1498:
Bid to the contract equal to the number of trumps you and your partner hold (and no higher) in a competitive auction
4553:
4482:
4147:
3987:
3977:
3967:
2750:
2725:
2700:
4543:
4392:
3667:
2974:
2964:
2467:
4728:
4573:
4277:
2755:
476:
4487:
4267:
837:
recommended deducting one HCP for K-Q, K-J, Q-J,Q-x,J-x Q-x-x, J-x-x holdings, this is now considered extreme.
959:
Identical to the Rule of 20 but some expert players believe that 20 is too limiting a barrier and prefer 19.
4307:
4167:
4037:
3992:
3926:
3055:
2715:
479:
of
Toronto and popularized by Charles Goren, distribution points are added for shortage rather than length.
44:
Hand evaluation methods assess various features of a hand, including: its high card strength, shape or suit
471:
Once a trump suit has been agreed, or at least a partial fit has been uncovered, it is argued by many that
4615:
4347:
4132:
4107:
4002:
3936:
3538:
3483:
3024:
2436:
817:
advocates the use of the control count to make adjustments to the LTC hand evaluation method (see below).
1496:
is derived from the Law of Total Tricks and argues that this is more often than not a winning strategy, "
4427:
4422:
3982:
3533:
3240:
3115:
3090:
2415:
1945:
3921:
3419:
3120:
79:
510:
Shortage points (also known as support points or dummy points) are added to HCP to give total points.
4622:
4417:
4402:
4372:
4302:
4297:
4127:
3997:
3931:
2959:
2258:
1986:
1267:
807:
799:
314:
the use of additional point values for hand shape or distribution (known as distribution points), and
2292:. Master Bridge Series. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd in association with Peter Crawley. p. 157.
1263:
4683:
4382:
4377:
4197:
3682:
3528:
3503:
3468:
2924:
2795:
2153:
2119:
1463:
1370:
803:
395:
2590:
1458:
Law of Total Tricks, Total Trumps
Principle, TNT (Total Number of Trumps = Total Number of Tricks)
4594:
4531:
4477:
4432:
3911:
3895:
3885:
3165:
2984:
2929:
2849:
2800:
2785:
2695:
2675:
2489:
2312:
2194:
1490:
is defined as the sum of the number of tricks available to each side if they could choose trumps.
1412:
1095:
4652:
3095:
2353:
2347:
1262:
Thinking that the method tended to overvalue unsupported queens and undervalue supported jacks,
2265:(9th printing, 1997, revised and expanded ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Natco Press. p. 286.
4699:
4462:
4362:
4342:
4243:
4112:
3513:
3399:
3320:
3300:
3160:
3085:
2989:
2914:
2869:
2745:
2529:
2513:
2501:
2475:
2444:
2392:
2373:
2357:
2322:
2293:
2276:
2266:
2240:
2228:
2206:
2180:
2161:
2139:
2082:
2072:
2045:
2035:
2008:
1998:
1972:
1953:
765:
73:
28:
1667:
advises to focus on just a few hands that partner might be holding, and more particularly on
4666:
4407:
4317:
3598:
3577:
3493:
3463:
3453:
3448:
3265:
3260:
3060:
2979:
2889:
2735:
2730:
2720:
2690:
1424:
769:
343:
38:
2572:
for software hand evaluators based on approaches by Kaplan and Rubens and by Danny
Kleinman
840:
Honour singletons; some exempt the singleton ace but others consider it inflexible in play.
764:
The interpretation of the significance of the control count is based upon a publication by
4659:
4287:
4282:
4142:
3623:
3593:
3389:
3379:
3315:
3270:
2919:
2879:
2780:
2770:
2710:
2705:
2626:
2428:
2115:
2111:
406:. The Four Aces' book (Jacoby may have written most or all of it) gives the simpler 3-2-1-
403:
391:
20:
3404:
3155:
2575:
4580:
4228:
3916:
3563:
3548:
3518:
3508:
3473:
3409:
3394:
3310:
3235:
3225:
3140:
3070:
3009:
2864:
2859:
2680:
2655:
2372:(13th impression). London: by Cassell in association with Peter Crawley, pp. 143.
834:
24:
2569:
1454:
There is no evidence that this method is better than the original losing trick count.
325:
Collectively, these more effectively evaluate the combined holdings of a partnership.
4722:
4352:
4122:
4117:
3618:
3608:
3553:
3543:
3488:
3478:
3458:
3424:
3414:
3384:
3369:
3325:
3255:
3245:
2994:
2874:
2844:
2775:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2494:
2308:
2107:
2094:
2058:
2021:
1347:
887:
The next suit below RHO's suit when overcalling reduces the opponents' bidding space.
399:
128:
98:
87:
2580:
881:
Two or three intermediate cards in a suit (8, 9 10) especially if headed by honours.
295:
tricks in notrump. In this case, the difference in trick-taking potential is due to
4292:
4092:
3628:
3603:
3558:
3305:
3295:
3275:
3150:
3125:
3034:
3029:
3014:
2899:
2790:
2760:
2685:
2391:. Master Bridge Series. London: Victor Gollancz in association with Peter Crawley.
2199:
1379:
Qxx = 3 losers (or possibly 2.5) unless trumps, or unless partner has bid the suit.
472:
354:
Goren and others recommend deducting one HCP for a singleton king, queen, or jack.
916:
Attacking values that suggest a hand should play a contract as declarer or dummy:
1249:
With only 5 losers and a fit, a slam is likely so responder may bid straight to 6
4548:
4223:
3890:
3434:
3355:
3135:
3100:
3080:
3004:
2969:
2894:
2854:
2384:
2343:
2338:. American Contract Bridge League, Bridge Bulletin, August 2004, pp. 27–28.
2220:
2131:
1664:
1391:
1295:
814:
634:
W E
567:
W E
234:
W E
167:
W E
150:
94:
1838:
Bergen, 2002, page 8. Bergen does not cite the source of the computer analysis.
1581:
This method is used when replying to very strong suit opening bids such as the
852:
The club suit when opening because it allows opponents to overcall more easily.
64:
using a combination of high card points and distributional points, as follows.
4337:
4137:
3941:
3613:
3429:
3145:
3039:
3019:
2999:
2939:
2934:
2765:
1643:
2326:
1913:
Francis et al, 2001, page 144: EXPECTED NUMBER OF CONTROLS IN BALANCED HANDS.
1674:
with the high cards selected such that these fit precisely with your own hand
482:
When the supporting hand holds three trumps, shortness is valued as follows:
4412:
3374:
3230:
3075:
2086:
2012:
1302:
1275:
1518:
is deemed more suitable. Responding to such hands is best made considering
2564:
2349:
Bidding to Win at Contract Bridge, Book One: The Modern Losing Trick Count
1253:
if preemptive bidding seems appropriate or take a slower forcing approach.
4442:
3110:
2949:
2904:
1629:
strong 2 of a suit opening bid is made on 8 playing tricks (Landy 1998)
3350:
3250:
3130:
2954:
2884:
2805:
833:
Honour doubletons K-Q, Q-J. Q-x, J-x unless in partners suit. Although
1614:
the suit; for short suits only clear winner combinations are counted:
3290:
2555:
Guidelines for hand evaluation for beginners – Karen's Bridge Library
429:
2549:
2160:. Ryden Grange, Bisley, Surrey, England, United Kingdom: Mr Bridge.
1605:
quick tricks are needed to make a positive response (Klinger 1994).
2560:
Basic hand evaluation for opening one-bids – Karen's Bridge Library
2179:. London, England, United Kingdom: B.T. Batsford Ltd. p. 176.
1817:
846:
Honours in opponents' suit when deciding to support partner's suit.
2595:
2559:
1990:
795:
should further bidding reveal West lacking a control in diamonds.
932:
Methods to help with opening bids and overcalls on marginal hands
884:
The spade suit when opening ... makes overcalling more difficult.
307:
in the evaluation of their hands, and make adjustments based on:
3105:
3065:
2370:
The Modern Losing Trick Count: Bidding to Win at Contract Bridge
2280:
2049:
1626:
1582:
346:
advocates adding one HCP if holding four or more aces and tens.
4508:
4058:
3649:
3202:
2826:
2637:
2599:
2554:
3860:
List of bridge people with Knowledge (XXG) (English) articles
2576:
Environmental factors affecting hand evaluation – BridgeHands
1443:
cards in a suit are counted as six half-losers (3.0 losers).
2352:. Sydney, Australia: Modern Bridge Publications. pp.
1224:
next bid by responder. Thus following an opening bid of 1
553:
different slam potential depending on the control count.
60:
Most bidding systems use a basic point-count system for
2441:
The Complete Book on Hand Evaluation in Contract Bridge
2586:
A General Method for Valuing Bridge Hand Distributions
1382:
Subtract a loser if there is a known 9-card trump fit.
875:
Honours in partner's suit when deciding to support it.
311:
refinements to the HCP valuation for certain holdings,
1904:
Francis et al, 1994, page 111: DISTRIBUTIONAL COUNTS.
1394:
advocates adjusting the number of loser based on the
622:
555:
317:
bidding techniques to determine the specifics of any
222:
155:
2565:
Basic hand evaluation criteria – Pattaya Bridge Club
1883:
Francis et al, 2001, page 120: Distributional Count.
902:
Defensive values that suggest a hand should defend:
843:
Honour combinations not accompanied by a small card.
4692:
4676:
4632:
4519:
4216:
4085:
4069:
3950:
3904:
3878:
3852:
3691:
3660:
3586:
3334:
3213:
3174:
3048:
2837:
2648:
2134:; collab Pat Husband & Andrew Kambites (1994).
862:Positive features worth more than the HCP suggest:
829:Negative features worth less than the HCP suggest:
2493:
2406:Koelman, Johannes (May 2003). "The Bridge World".
2198:
2550:Advanced hand evaluation theory by Thomas Andrews
1235:With 8 losers in hand and a fit, responder bids 3
783:, both East hands should aim for at least game (4
849:Honours in side suits when deciding to overcall.
141:37 HCP are necessary for a grand slam, i.e. 7 NT
138:33 HCP are necessary for a small slam, i.e. 6 NT
1922:Francis et al. 2001, page 401: RULE OF TWENTY.
987:Methods to help when a fit has been discovered
878:Honours in own suit when deciding to overcall.
776:of controls (4) more equivalent to 12–13 HCP.
131:for games and slams in notrump is as follows:
2611:
2263:To Bid or Not to Bid: The LAW of Total Tricks
2227:. New York: Grosset and Dunlap. p. 241.
1783:
1781:
1779:
1751:
1749:
1747:
1745:
1743:
1741:
1111:a singleton other than an A = 1 losing trick.
813:In his book "The Modern Losing Trick Count",
8:
1971:. Toronto: Master Point Press. p. 175.
1891:
1889:
1432:missing Ace = three half-losers (1.5 losers)
869:Two or three honours in long suits (better).
4203:World Transnational Open Teams Championship
1804:
1802:
1755:Francis et al, 2001, page 355: POINT-COUNT.
1438:missing Queen = one half-loser (0.5 losers)
1239:(8+7=15 which deducted from 24 = 9 tricks).
16:Bidding systems devised for contract bridge
4516:
4505:
4239:European Universities Bridge Championships
4103:Bridge at the 2012 World Mind Sports Games
4098:Bridge at the 2008 World Mind Sports Games
4066:
4055:
3657:
3646:
3210:
3199:
2834:
2823:
2645:
2634:
2618:
2604:
2596:
2290:Understanding Acol. The Good Bidding Guide
2288:Crowhurst, Eric; Kambites, Andrew (1992).
1855:
1853:
1769:
1767:
1765:
1763:
1761:
1435:missing King = two half-losers (1.0 loser)
920:Honours in own suit (the more the better).
4458:United States Bridge Championships - Open
4234:Commonwealth Nations Bridge Championships
2443:. Hawthorne, CA: Max Hardy. p. 194.
1242:With 9 losers and a fit, responder bids 2
906:Honours in shortish side suits, e.g. Kxx.
303:Accordingly, expert players use HCP as a
4018:List of contract bridge governing bodies
2458:Lawrence, Mike; Wirgren, Anders (2004).
1952:. Palm Beach Gardens, FL: Bergen Books.
1114:a doubleton AK = 0, Ax or KQ = 1, Kx = 1
993:
909:Honours and/or length in opponents suit.
693:
135:25 HCP are necessary for game, i.e. 3 NT
2472:Mendelson's Guide to the Bidding Battle
2124:The Four Aces System of Contract Bridge
1997:. Aylesbury, UK: English Bridge Union.
1737:
388:The Four Aces System of Contract Bridge
291:suit and the club suit, respectively).
4077:List of bridge competitions and awards
3678:List of nationality transfers in sport
2528:. London: B.T. Batsford. p. 141.
2424:
2413:
2099:Point Count Bidding in Contract Bridge
872:Honour sequences in long suits (best).
631:
564:
231:
164:
4567:25 Bridge Conventions You Should Know
4448:Sternberg Women's Board-a-Match Teams
4013:International Mind Sports Association
7:
4251:North American bridge Championships:
1683:Rubens gives the following example:
1534:2 quick tricks = AK of the same suit
4602:The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge
4398:North American Bridge Championships
2177:Bridge: TNT and Competitive Bidding
2101:. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc.
2064:The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge
2061:; Francis, Dorthy A., eds. (2001).
2027:The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge
2024:; Francis, Dorthy A., eds. (1994).
1559:1 quick trick = KQ in the same suit
1474:Bridge: TNT and Competitive Bidding
1270:refined the scale, as have others:
532:play, value high-card points only.
4609:Planning the Play of a Bridge Hand
4313:Keohane North American Swiss Teams
2581:Hand Evaluation articles and ideas
2500:. New York: Crown Publishers Inc.
2175:Payne, Dick; Amsbury, Joe (1981).
1967:Downey, Ned; Pomer, Ellen (2005).
1950:Hand Evaluation: Points Schmoints!
1577:quick trick = Kx (not K singleton)
1553:quick tricks = AQ in the same suit
1395:
14:
4640:List of contract bridge magazines
2945:Optimum contract and par contract
2741:Glossary of contract bridge terms
1509:Methods to help with strong hands
1133:a three card suit AKQ = 0, AKx =
33:Glossary of contract bridge terms
2460:I Fought the Law of Total Tricks
2318:The Bridge Players' Encyclopedia
2205:. New York: Three Rivers Press.
1895:Downey and Pomer, 2005, page 35.
1829:Downey and Pomer, 2005, page 27.
1719:
1694:
1216:
1083:
1071:
1053:
1020:
1012:
779:If West opens the bidding with 1
4438:Smith Life Master Women's Pairs
4193:World Senior Teams Championship
4188:World Senior Pairs Championship
4163:World Junior Teams Championship
4158:World Junior Pairs Championship
4033:United States Bridge Federation
4028:South African Bridge Federation
3963:American Contract Bridge League
3499:Non-simultaneous double squeeze
2126:. New York: The Four Aces, Inc.
2069:American Contract Bridge League
2032:American Contract Bridge League
983:suitable for a preemptive bid.
978:9 = a three level bid .... etc.
523:positive distributional count.
458:7 card suit = 3 points ... etc.
4468:Von Zedtwitz Life Master Pairs
4333:Manfield Non-Life Master Pairs
4323:Leventritt Silver Ribbon Pairs
4263:Edgar Kaplan Blue Ribbon Pairs
4208:World Women Pairs Championship
4178:World Mixed Teams Championship
4173:World Mixed Pairs Championship
3673:List of contract bridge people
3281:Principle of restricted choice
2591:Hand Evaluation – Marty Bergen
2315:; Barrow, Rhoda, eds. (1967).
1715:
1711:
1705:
1690:
1686:
1250:
1243:
1236:
1225:
1212:
1208:
1079:
1067:
1063:
1047:
1043:
1026:
1006:
890:Honours in suits shown by RHO.
858:Honours in suits shown by LHO.
792:
788:
784:
780:
768:in the December 1974 issue of
1:
4588:Contract Bridge for Beginners
4527:List of contract bridge books
4183:World Open Pairs Championship
3865:List of bridge administrators
2474:. Cambridge, UK: Colt Books.
2389:How Good is Your Bridge Hand?
2225:The Secrets of Winning Bridge
2067:(6th ed.). Memphis, TN:
2030:(5th ed.). Memphis, TN:
1723:
1698:
1661:The Secrets of Winning Bridge
1586:
1407:New Losing Trick Count (NLTC)
1388:The Modern Losing Trick Count
1220:
1207:A typical opening hand, e.g.
1075:
1057:
153:gives the following example:
4473:Wagar Women's Knockout Teams
4358:Mitchell Board-a-Match Teams
4258:ACBL King or Queen of Bridge
4153:World IMP Pairs Championship
1869:Canadian Bridge Federation,
1346:AJ10 = 1 loser according to
1031:
1017:
1003:
912:Lack of honours in own suit.
753:
745:
737:
729:
721:
713:
705:
4453:Truscott Senior Swiss Teams
4388:Non-Life Master Swiss Teams
4368:Nail Life Master Open Pairs
4328:Machlin Women's Swiss Teams
4273:Chicago Mixed Board-a-Match
4023:Norwegian Bridge Federation
4008:Hungarian Bridge Federation
3973:Brazilian Bridge Federation
3958:American Bridge Association
3524:Simultaneous double squeeze
3182:List of bidding conventions
2387:; Kambites, Andrew (2000).
2138:. London: Victor Gollancz.
1859:English Bridge Union, 1998.
1321:losers according to others.
78:First published in 1915 by
4750:
4554:Terence Reese bibliography
4510:Publications and resources
4148:World Bridge Championships
3988:Canadian Bridge Federation
3978:Bridge Federation of India
3968:Austrian Bridge Federation
2751:History of contract bridge
2726:Duplicate bridge movements
1969:Standard Bidding with SAYC
1820:retrieved August 11, 2011.
1641:
1494:The Total Trumps Principle
1461:
1093:
895:Defensive/attacking values
821:Negative/positive features
71:
18:
4544:Edwin Kantar bibliography
4515:
4504:
4393:Norman Kay Platinum Pairs
4065:
4054:
3668:ACBL Youngest Life Master
3656:
3645:
3209:
3198:
2975:Quantitative notrump bids
2965:Principle of fast arrival
2833:
2822:
2644:
2633:
2526:Hand Evaluation in Bridge
1168:a three card suit Axx = 1
1108:a void = 0 losing tricks.
996:
923:Lack of defensive values.
696:
4574:Bridge Squeezes Complete
4549:Hugh Kelsey bibliography
4278:Fall National Open Pairs
3651:People and organizations
2756:Laws of Duplicate Bridge
1818:Richard Pavlicek website
1796:Rubens, 1971, pages 7–8.
1200:, xxx = 3 losing tricks.
1090:Losing-Trick Count (LTC)
810:convention and cuebids.
808:Roman Key Card Blackwood
56:Basic point-count system
4734:Contract bridge bidding
4483:Whitehead Women's Pairs
4308:Jacoby Open Swiss Teams
4168:World Mind Sports Games
4038:World Bridge Federation
3993:Dutch Bridge Federation
3927:Galatasaray Bridge Team
3221:List of play techniques
3056:List of bidding systems
2716:Contract bridge diagram
2321:. London: Paul Hamlyn.
1480:The Law of Total Tricks
1130:, xx = 2 losing tricks.
963:Suit Quality Test (SQT)
4616:Right Through the Pack
4348:Mini-Blue Ribbon Pairs
4133:Triple crown of bridge
4108:Cavendish Invitational
4003:European Bridge League
3937:Portland Club (London)
3870:List of bridge writers
3539:Stepping-stone squeeze
3484:Entry-shifting squeeze
3121:Kaplan–Sheinwold
3025:Useful space principle
2570:Jeff Goldsmith website
2524:Senior, Brian (1998).
2423:Cite journal requires
2334:Jabbour, Zeke (2004).
2158:Better Hand Evaluation
1618:A = 1, AK = 2, AKQ = 3
1420:New Losing Trick Count
1413:New Losing Trick Count
866:Honours in long suits.
455:6 card suit = 2 points
321:cards held by partner.
4428:Senior Knockout Teams
4423:Roth Open Swiss Teams
3983:British Bridge League
3116:Highly unusual method
3091:Bridge World Standard
1873:, April 2012, page 18
1847:Jacoby, 1935, page 5.
1808:Goren, 1954, page 11.
1669:perfect minimum hands
1633:More advanced methods
1041:For example, holding
536:Supplementary methods
467:Suit shortness points
452:5-card suit = 1 point
435:Distributional points
350:For unguarded honours
4623:Tickets to the Devil
4418:Rockwell Mixed Pairs
4403:North American Pairs
4373:National 199er Pairs
4303:Hilliard Mixed Pairs
4298:Grand National Teams
4128:Senior Bowl (bridge)
3998:English Bridge Union
3932:Melville Bridge Club
2960:Prepared opening bid
2120:Gottlieb, Michael T.
1987:English Bridge Union
1369:losers according to
1046: K109864
800:Blackwood convention
503:singleton = 3 points
489:singleton = 2 points
390:by (alphabetically)
4684:Grand Slam (BBC TV)
4488:Young LM–1500 Pairs
4383:National 99er Pairs
4378:National 49er Pairs
4268:Bruce LM–5000 Pairs
4198:World Team Olympiad
3683:Bridge Headquarters
3529:Single-suit squeeze
3504:Progressive squeeze
3469:Criss-cross squeeze
2925:Law of total tricks
2796:Traveling scoreslip
2496:Commonsense Bidding
2057:Francis, Henry G.;
2020:Francis, Henry G.;
1995:Really Easy Bidding
1931:Payne, 1981, page 7
1676:. He advises that "
1464:Law of Total Tricks
1294:loser according to
975:8 = a two level bid
972:7 = a one level bid
804:Norman four notrump
506:doubleton = 1 point
492:doubleton = 1 point
396:Michael T. Gottlieb
4595:Design for Bidding
4532:Master Point Press
4478:Wernher Open Pairs
4433:Silodor Open Pairs
4217:National and Zonal
3912:Bridge Base Online
3692:Players by country
3571:Suit combinations:
3420:Morton's fork coup
3166:Strong club system
2985:Sacrifice (bridge)
2930:Losing-Trick Count
2850:Balancing (bridge)
2786:Singaporean bridge
2696:Cheating in bridge
2676:Bridge Murder case
2307:Frey, Richard L.;
2201:The ABCs of Bridge
1993:Committee (1998).
1504:majority of hands"
1340:loser ... not one.
1184:, Kxx = 2, Qxx = 2
1149:, AQx = 1, KQx = 1
1096:Losing-Trick Count
444:Suit length points
4716:
4715:
4712:
4711:
4708:
4707:
4700:Bridge Base Basic
4500:
4499:
4496:
4495:
4463:Vanderbilt Trophy
4363:Mott-Smith Trophy
4343:Master Individual
4244:Gold Cup (bridge)
4113:Computer Olympiad
4050:
4049:
4046:
4045:
3641:
3640:
3637:
3636:
3514:Saturated squeeze
3400:Deschapelles coup
3194:
3193:
3190:
3189:
3161:Standard American
3086:Bridge Base Basic
2990:Shooting (bridge)
2915:Honor point count
2870:Bridge convention
2818:
2817:
2814:
2813:
2746:High card by suit
2535:978-0-7134-8294-2
2378:978-0-304-35770-3
2336:Lawless Territory
2309:Truscott, Alan F.
2059:Truscott, Alan F.
2022:Truscott, Alan F.
1989:; Landy, Sandra;
1978:978-1-897106-03-7
1556:1 quick trick = A
1039:
1038:
766:George Rosenkranz
762:
761:
688:
687:
621:
620:
514:Combination Count
358:Alternative scale
334:For aces and tens
288:
287:
221:
220:
80:Bryant McCampbell
74:Honor point count
29:Bridge convention
4741:
4667:The Bridge World
4649:
4648:
4563:
4562:
4541:
4540:
4517:
4506:
4408:Red Ribbon Pairs
4318:Lebhar IMP Pairs
4253:
4252:
4067:
4056:
3951:Governing bodies
3658:
3647:
3599:Journalist leads
3578:Suit combination
3573:
3572:
3494:Knockout squeeze
3464:Compound squeeze
3454:Cannibal squeeze
3449:Backwash squeeze
3444:
3443:
3365:
3364:
3346:
3345:
3261:Grosvenor gambit
3211:
3200:
3061:2/1 game forcing
2980:Reverse (bridge)
2890:Five-card majors
2835:
2824:
2731:Five-suit bridge
2721:Duplicate bridge
2646:
2635:
2620:
2613:
2606:
2597:
2539:
2511:
2499:
2485:
2463:
2454:
2432:
2426:
2421:
2419:
2411:
2402:
2367:
2339:
2330:
2303:
2284:
2238:
2216:
2204:
2190:
2171:
2149:
2127:
2116:Schenken, Howard
2112:Burnstine, David
2103:Also: 1950, 1954
2102:
2090:
2053:
2016:
1982:
1963:
1932:
1929:
1923:
1920:
1914:
1911:
1905:
1902:
1896:
1893:
1884:
1881:
1875:
1866:
1860:
1857:
1848:
1845:
1839:
1836:
1830:
1827:
1821:
1815:
1809:
1806:
1797:
1794:
1788:
1785:
1774:
1771:
1756:
1753:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1707:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1604:
1602:
1601:
1598:
1595:
1588:
1576:
1574:
1573:
1570:
1567:
1552:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1543:
1425:The Bridge World
1376:QJ10 = 2 losers.
1368:
1366:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1339:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1320:
1318:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1293:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1284:
1252:
1245:
1238:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1199:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1148:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1129:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1059:
1056: KQ8
1055:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1028:
1022:
1014:
1008:
994:
806:convention, the
794:
790:
786:
782:
770:The Bridge World
694:
623:
556:
477:William Anderson
421:
419:
418:
415:
412:
375:jack = 0.75 HCP
344:Richard Pavlicek
223:
156:
68:High card points
39:optimum contract
4749:
4748:
4744:
4743:
4742:
4740:
4739:
4738:
4729:Contract bridge
4719:
4718:
4717:
4704:
4688:
4672:
4660:Bridge Magazine
4653:Bridge d'Italia
4646:
4645:
4628:
4560:
4559:
4539:Bibliographies:
4538:
4537:
4511:
4492:
4288:Fishbein Trophy
4283:Fast Open Pairs
4250:
4249:
4212:
4143:WBF Youth Award
4081:
4061:
4042:
3946:
3900:
3874:
3848:
3687:
3652:
3633:
3594:Forcing defense
3582:
3570:
3569:
3441:
3440:
3390:Coup en passant
3380:Belladonna coup
3362:
3361:
3343:
3342:
3330:
3316:Trump promotion
3271:Percentage play
3205:
3186:
3170:
3096:Canapé (bridge)
3044:
2920:Inverted minors
2910:Hand evaluation
2880:Convention card
2829:
2810:
2771:Neuberg formula
2711:Contract bridge
2706:Computer bridge
2640:
2629:
2627:Contract bridge
2624:
2546:
2536:
2523:
2508:
2488:
2482:
2468:Mendelson, Paul
2466:
2457:
2451:
2435:
2422:
2412:
2405:
2399:
2383:
2364:
2342:
2333:
2306:
2300:
2287:
2273:
2257:
2254:
2252:Further reading
2249:
2235:
2219:
2213:
2193:
2187:
2174:
2168:
2152:
2146:
2130:
2106:
2093:
2079:
2056:
2042:
2019:
2005:
1985:
1979:
1966:
1960:
1944:
1935:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1917:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1887:
1882:
1878:
1867:
1863:
1858:
1851:
1846:
1842:
1837:
1833:
1828:
1824:
1816:
1812:
1807:
1800:
1795:
1791:
1786:
1777:
1772:
1759:
1754:
1739:
1735:
1704:Partner opens 1
1654:
1646:
1640:
1635:
1621:KQ = 1, KQJ = 2
1611:
1599:
1596:
1593:
1592:
1590:
1571:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1562:
1547:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1538:
1528:
1511:
1466:
1460:
1409:
1363:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1354:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1325:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1306:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1279:
1268:Andrew Kambites
1260:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1150:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1134:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1098:
1092:
1052:
1042:
989:
965:
957:
948:
939:
934:
897:
823:
701:
546:
538:
529:
516:
500:void = 5 points
486:void = 3 points
469:
446:
437:
426:
416:
413:
410:
409:
407:
404:Howard Schenken
392:David Burnstine
372:queen = 1.5 HCP
366:ace = 4.5 HCP
331:
125:
84:Auction Tactics
76:
70:
62:hand evaluation
58:
35:
21:Contract bridge
19:Main articles:
17:
12:
11:
5:
4747:
4745:
4737:
4736:
4731:
4721:
4720:
4714:
4713:
4710:
4709:
4706:
4705:
4703:
4702:
4696:
4694:
4693:External links
4690:
4689:
4687:
4686:
4680:
4678:
4674:
4673:
4671:
4670:
4663:
4656:
4642:
4636:
4634:
4630:
4629:
4627:
4626:
4619:
4612:
4605:
4598:
4591:
4584:
4581:The Cardturner
4577:
4570:
4556:
4551:
4546:
4534:
4529:
4523:
4521:
4513:
4512:
4509:
4502:
4501:
4498:
4497:
4494:
4493:
4491:
4490:
4485:
4480:
4475:
4470:
4465:
4460:
4455:
4450:
4445:
4440:
4435:
4430:
4425:
4420:
4415:
4410:
4405:
4400:
4395:
4390:
4385:
4380:
4375:
4370:
4365:
4360:
4355:
4350:
4345:
4340:
4335:
4330:
4325:
4320:
4315:
4310:
4305:
4300:
4295:
4290:
4285:
4280:
4275:
4270:
4265:
4260:
4255:
4246:
4241:
4236:
4231:
4229:Camrose Trophy
4226:
4220:
4218:
4214:
4213:
4211:
4210:
4205:
4200:
4195:
4190:
4185:
4180:
4175:
4170:
4165:
4160:
4155:
4150:
4145:
4140:
4135:
4130:
4125:
4120:
4115:
4110:
4105:
4100:
4095:
4089:
4087:
4083:
4082:
4080:
4079:
4073:
4071:
4063:
4062:
4059:
4052:
4051:
4048:
4047:
4044:
4043:
4041:
4040:
4035:
4030:
4025:
4020:
4015:
4010:
4005:
4000:
3995:
3990:
3985:
3980:
3975:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3954:
3952:
3948:
3947:
3945:
3944:
3939:
3934:
3929:
3924:
3919:
3917:Cavendish Club
3914:
3908:
3906:
3902:
3901:
3899:
3898:
3893:
3888:
3882:
3880:
3876:
3875:
3873:
3872:
3867:
3862:
3856:
3854:
3850:
3849:
3847:
3846:
3841:
3836:
3831:
3826:
3821:
3816:
3811:
3806:
3801:
3796:
3791:
3786:
3781:
3776:
3771:
3766:
3761:
3756:
3751:
3746:
3741:
3736:
3731:
3726:
3721:
3716:
3711:
3706:
3701:
3695:
3693:
3689:
3688:
3686:
3685:
3680:
3675:
3670:
3664:
3662:
3654:
3653:
3650:
3643:
3642:
3639:
3638:
3635:
3634:
3632:
3631:
3626:
3621:
3616:
3611:
3606:
3601:
3596:
3590:
3588:
3584:
3583:
3581:
3580:
3575:
3566:
3564:Winkle squeeze
3561:
3556:
3551:
3549:Triple squeeze
3546:
3541:
3536:
3531:
3526:
3521:
3519:Simple squeeze
3516:
3511:
3509:Pseudo-squeeze
3506:
3501:
3496:
3491:
3486:
3481:
3476:
3474:Double squeeze
3471:
3466:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3437:
3432:
3427:
3422:
3417:
3412:
3410:Loser on loser
3407:
3402:
3397:
3395:Crocodile coup
3392:
3387:
3382:
3377:
3372:
3367:
3358:
3353:
3348:
3338:
3336:
3332:
3331:
3329:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3288:
3283:
3278:
3273:
3268:
3263:
3258:
3253:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3226:Avoidance play
3223:
3217:
3215:
3207:
3206:
3203:
3196:
3195:
3192:
3191:
3188:
3187:
3185:
3184:
3178:
3176:
3172:
3171:
3169:
3168:
3163:
3158:
3153:
3148:
3143:
3141:Precision Club
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3071:Bidding system
3068:
3063:
3058:
3052:
3050:
3046:
3045:
3043:
3042:
3037:
3032:
3027:
3022:
3017:
3012:
3010:Takeout double
3007:
3002:
2997:
2992:
2987:
2982:
2977:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2952:
2947:
2942:
2937:
2932:
2927:
2922:
2917:
2912:
2907:
2902:
2897:
2892:
2887:
2882:
2877:
2872:
2867:
2865:Board (bridge)
2862:
2860:Bidding system
2857:
2852:
2847:
2841:
2839:
2831:
2830:
2827:
2820:
2819:
2816:
2815:
2812:
2811:
2809:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2683:
2681:Bridge scoring
2678:
2673:
2668:
2663:
2658:
2656:Auction bridge
2652:
2650:
2642:
2641:
2638:
2631:
2630:
2625:
2623:
2622:
2615:
2608:
2600:
2594:
2593:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2573:
2567:
2562:
2557:
2552:
2545:
2544:External links
2542:
2541:
2540:
2534:
2521:
2506:
2486:
2480:
2464:
2455:
2449:
2437:Lawrence, Mike
2433:
2425:|journal=
2403:
2397:
2381:
2362:
2340:
2331:
2304:
2298:
2285:
2271:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2247:
2233:
2217:
2211:
2191:
2185:
2172:
2166:
2154:Magee, Bernard
2150:
2144:
2128:
2108:Jacoby, Oswald
2104:
2095:Goren, Charles
2091:
2077:
2054:
2040:
2017:
2003:
1983:
1977:
1964:
1958:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1934:
1933:
1924:
1915:
1906:
1897:
1885:
1876:
1861:
1849:
1840:
1831:
1822:
1810:
1798:
1789:
1775:
1757:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1653:
1650:
1642:Main article:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1623:
1622:
1619:
1610:
1609:Playing Tricks
1607:
1579:
1578:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1535:
1527:
1524:
1516:playing tricks
1510:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1501:
1491:
1477:
1469:partnerships.
1462:Main article:
1459:
1456:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1433:
1408:
1405:
1384:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1374:
1351:
1344:
1343:KQJ = 1 loser.
1341:
1322:
1299:
1264:Eric Crowhurst
1259:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1247:
1240:
1233:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1166:
1131:
1112:
1109:
1094:Main article:
1091:
1088:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1023:
1016:
1015:
1009:
1002:
1001:
998:
988:
985:
980:
979:
976:
973:
964:
961:
956:
953:
947:
944:
938:
935:
933:
930:
925:
924:
921:
914:
913:
910:
907:
896:
893:
892:
891:
888:
885:
882:
879:
876:
873:
870:
867:
860:
859:
856:
853:
850:
847:
844:
841:
838:
835:Samuel Stayman
822:
819:
760:
759:
756:
752:
751:
748:
744:
743:
740:
736:
735:
732:
728:
727:
724:
720:
719:
716:
712:
711:
708:
704:
703:
698:
686:
685:
682:
679:
676:
672:
671:
668:
665:
662:
658:
657:
654:
651:
648:
644:
643:
640:
637:
630:
627:
619:
618:
615:
612:
609:
605:
604:
601:
598:
595:
591:
590:
587:
584:
581:
577:
576:
573:
570:
563:
560:
545:
542:
537:
534:
528:
525:
515:
512:
508:
507:
504:
501:
494:
493:
490:
487:
468:
465:
460:
459:
456:
453:
445:
442:
436:
433:
424:
380:
379:
376:
373:
370:
367:
360:
359:
352:
351:
336:
335:
330:
327:
323:
322:
315:
312:
305:starting point
286:
285:
282:
279:
276:
272:
271:
268:
265:
262:
258:
257:
254:
251:
248:
244:
243:
240:
237:
230:
227:
219:
218:
215:
212:
209:
205:
204:
201:
198:
195:
191:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
176:
173:
170:
163:
160:
143:
142:
139:
136:
124:
121:
116:
115:
112:
109:
106:
72:Main article:
69:
66:
57:
54:
25:Bidding system
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4746:
4735:
4732:
4730:
4727:
4726:
4724:
4701:
4698:
4697:
4695:
4691:
4685:
4682:
4681:
4679:
4675:
4669:
4668:
4664:
4662:
4661:
4657:
4655:
4654:
4650:
4643:
4641:
4638:
4637:
4635:
4631:
4625:
4624:
4620:
4618:
4617:
4613:
4611:
4610:
4606:
4604:
4603:
4599:
4597:
4596:
4592:
4590:
4589:
4585:
4583:
4582:
4578:
4576:
4575:
4571:
4569:
4568:
4564:
4557:
4555:
4552:
4550:
4547:
4545:
4542:
4535:
4533:
4530:
4528:
4525:
4524:
4522:
4518:
4514:
4507:
4503:
4489:
4486:
4484:
4481:
4479:
4476:
4474:
4471:
4469:
4466:
4464:
4461:
4459:
4456:
4454:
4451:
4449:
4446:
4444:
4441:
4439:
4436:
4434:
4431:
4429:
4426:
4424:
4421:
4419:
4416:
4414:
4411:
4409:
4406:
4404:
4401:
4399:
4396:
4394:
4391:
4389:
4386:
4384:
4381:
4379:
4376:
4374:
4371:
4369:
4366:
4364:
4361:
4359:
4356:
4354:
4353:Mini-Spingold
4351:
4349:
4346:
4344:
4341:
4339:
4336:
4334:
4331:
4329:
4326:
4324:
4321:
4319:
4316:
4314:
4311:
4309:
4306:
4304:
4301:
4299:
4296:
4294:
4291:
4289:
4286:
4284:
4281:
4279:
4276:
4274:
4271:
4269:
4266:
4264:
4261:
4259:
4256:
4254:
4247:
4245:
4242:
4240:
4237:
4235:
4232:
4230:
4227:
4225:
4222:
4221:
4219:
4215:
4209:
4206:
4204:
4201:
4199:
4196:
4194:
4191:
4189:
4186:
4184:
4181:
4179:
4176:
4174:
4171:
4169:
4166:
4164:
4161:
4159:
4156:
4154:
4151:
4149:
4146:
4144:
4141:
4139:
4136:
4134:
4131:
4129:
4126:
4124:
4123:Rosenblum Cup
4121:
4119:
4118:McConnell Cup
4116:
4114:
4111:
4109:
4106:
4104:
4101:
4099:
4096:
4094:
4091:
4090:
4088:
4084:
4078:
4075:
4074:
4072:
4068:
4064:
4060:Championships
4057:
4053:
4039:
4036:
4034:
4031:
4029:
4026:
4024:
4021:
4019:
4016:
4014:
4011:
4009:
4006:
4004:
4001:
3999:
3996:
3994:
3991:
3989:
3986:
3984:
3981:
3979:
3976:
3974:
3971:
3969:
3966:
3964:
3961:
3959:
3956:
3955:
3953:
3949:
3943:
3940:
3938:
3935:
3933:
3930:
3928:
3925:
3923:
3920:
3918:
3915:
3913:
3910:
3909:
3907:
3903:
3897:
3894:
3892:
3889:
3887:
3884:
3883:
3881:
3877:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3857:
3855:
3851:
3845:
3844:United States
3842:
3840:
3837:
3835:
3832:
3830:
3827:
3825:
3822:
3820:
3817:
3815:
3812:
3810:
3807:
3805:
3802:
3800:
3797:
3795:
3792:
3790:
3787:
3785:
3782:
3780:
3777:
3775:
3772:
3770:
3767:
3765:
3762:
3760:
3757:
3755:
3752:
3750:
3747:
3745:
3742:
3740:
3737:
3735:
3732:
3730:
3727:
3725:
3722:
3720:
3717:
3715:
3712:
3710:
3707:
3705:
3702:
3700:
3697:
3696:
3694:
3690:
3684:
3681:
3679:
3676:
3674:
3671:
3669:
3666:
3665:
3663:
3659:
3655:
3648:
3644:
3630:
3627:
3625:
3622:
3620:
3619:Rusinow leads
3617:
3615:
3612:
3610:
3609:Rule of 10-12
3607:
3605:
3602:
3600:
3597:
3595:
3592:
3591:
3589:
3587:Defender play
3585:
3579:
3576:
3574:
3567:
3565:
3562:
3560:
3557:
3555:
3554:Trump squeeze
3552:
3550:
3547:
3545:
3544:Strip squeeze
3542:
3540:
3537:
3535:
3532:
3530:
3527:
3525:
3522:
3520:
3517:
3515:
3512:
3510:
3507:
3505:
3502:
3500:
3497:
3495:
3492:
3490:
3489:Guard squeeze
3487:
3485:
3482:
3480:
3479:Entry squeeze
3477:
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3460:
3459:Clash squeeze
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3438:
3436:
3433:
3431:
3428:
3426:
3425:Scissors coup
3423:
3421:
3418:
3416:
3415:Merrimac coup
3413:
3411:
3408:
3406:
3403:
3401:
3398:
3396:
3393:
3391:
3388:
3386:
3383:
3381:
3378:
3376:
3373:
3371:
3370:Alcatraz coup
3368:
3366:
3359:
3357:
3354:
3352:
3349:
3347:
3340:
3339:
3337:
3335:Declarer play
3333:
3327:
3326:Vacant Places
3324:
3322:
3319:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3309:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3297:
3294:
3292:
3289:
3287:
3286:Probabilities
3284:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3267:
3264:
3262:
3259:
3257:
3254:
3252:
3249:
3247:
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3218:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3201:
3197:
3183:
3180:
3179:
3177:
3173:
3167:
3164:
3162:
3159:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3149:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3053:
3051:
3047:
3041:
3038:
3036:
3033:
3031:
3028:
3026:
3023:
3021:
3018:
3016:
3013:
3011:
3008:
3006:
3003:
3001:
2998:
2996:
2995:Single suiter
2993:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2981:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2938:
2936:
2933:
2931:
2928:
2926:
2923:
2921:
2918:
2916:
2913:
2911:
2908:
2906:
2903:
2901:
2898:
2896:
2893:
2891:
2888:
2886:
2883:
2881:
2878:
2876:
2875:Brown sticker
2873:
2871:
2868:
2866:
2863:
2861:
2858:
2856:
2853:
2851:
2848:
2846:
2845:Balanced hand
2843:
2842:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2825:
2821:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2776:Rubber bridge
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2672:
2671:Bridge maxims
2669:
2667:
2666:Bridge-O-Rama
2664:
2662:
2661:Bridge ethics
2659:
2657:
2654:
2653:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2621:
2616:
2614:
2609:
2607:
2602:
2601:
2598:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2571:
2568:
2566:
2563:
2561:
2558:
2556:
2553:
2551:
2548:
2547:
2543:
2537:
2531:
2527:
2522:
2519:
2518:0-517-56129-8
2515:
2509:
2507:0-517-56130-1
2503:
2498:
2497:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2481:0-905899-86-5
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2456:
2452:
2450:0-939460-27-0
2446:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2417:
2409:
2404:
2400:
2398:0-575-071-486
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2365:
2363:0-9592305-2-1
2359:
2355:
2351:
2350:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2314:
2310:
2305:
2301:
2299:0-575-05253-8
2295:
2291:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2272:0-9634715-0-3
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2255:
2251:
2246:
2245:0-448-01746-6
2242:
2236:
2234:0-448-02094-7
2230:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2212:0-609-80162-7
2208:
2203:
2202:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2182:
2178:
2173:
2169:
2167:1-85665-012-X
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2145:0-575-05690-8
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2078:0-943855-44-6
2074:
2070:
2066:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2041:0-943855-48-9
2037:
2033:
2029:
2028:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2004:0-9506279-2-5
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1974:
1970:
1965:
1961:
1959:0-9716636-5-3
1955:
1951:
1947:
1946:Bergen, Marty
1943:
1942:
1937:
1936:
1928:
1925:
1919:
1916:
1910:
1907:
1901:
1898:
1892:
1890:
1886:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1871:Bridge Canada
1865:
1862:
1856:
1854:
1850:
1844:
1841:
1835:
1832:
1826:
1823:
1819:
1814:
1811:
1805:
1803:
1799:
1793:
1790:
1787:Klinger, 1994
1784:
1782:
1780:
1776:
1770:
1768:
1766:
1764:
1762:
1758:
1752:
1750:
1748:
1746:
1744:
1742:
1738:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1709:
1702:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1657:
1652:Visualisation
1651:
1649:
1645:
1637:
1632:
1630:
1628:
1620:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1608:
1606:
1584:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1536:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1525:
1523:
1521:
1517:
1508:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1465:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1437:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1427:
1426:
1421:
1415:
1414:
1411:Main article
1406:
1404:
1400:
1397:
1396:control count
1393:
1389:
1381:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1371:Bernard Magee
1352:
1349:
1348:Harrison-Gray
1345:
1342:
1323:
1304:
1300:
1297:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1257:
1248:
1241:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1202:
1167:
1165:losing trick.
1132:
1113:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1097:
1089:
1087:
1035:
1032:
1024:
1018:
1010:
1004:
999:
995:
992:
986:
984:
977:
974:
971:
970:
969:
962:
960:
954:
952:
945:
943:
936:
931:
929:
922:
919:
918:
917:
911:
908:
905:
904:
903:
900:
894:
889:
886:
883:
880:
877:
874:
871:
868:
865:
864:
863:
857:
854:
851:
848:
845:
842:
839:
836:
832:
831:
830:
827:
820:
818:
816:
811:
809:
805:
801:
796:
777:
773:
771:
767:
757:
754:
749:
746:
741:
738:
733:
730:
725:
722:
717:
714:
709:
706:
699:
695:
692:
683:
680:
677:
674:
673:
669:
666:
663:
660:
659:
655:
652:
649:
646:
645:
641:
638:
636:
635:
628:
625:
624:
616:
613:
610:
607:
606:
602:
599:
596:
593:
592:
588:
585:
582:
579:
578:
574:
571:
569:
568:
561:
558:
557:
554:
550:
544:Control count
543:
541:
535:
533:
526:
524:
520:
513:
511:
505:
502:
499:
498:
497:
491:
488:
485:
484:
483:
480:
478:
474:
466:
464:
457:
454:
451:
450:
449:
443:
441:
434:
432:
431:
423:
405:
401:
400:Oswald Jacoby
397:
393:
389:
384:
377:
374:
371:
369:king = 3 HCP
368:
365:
364:
363:
357:
356:
355:
349:
348:
347:
345:
339:
333:
332:
328:
326:
320:
316:
313:
310:
309:
308:
306:
301:
298:
292:
283:
280:
277:
274:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
259:
255:
252:
249:
246:
245:
241:
238:
236:
235:
228:
225:
224:
216:
213:
210:
207:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
192:
188:
185:
182:
179:
178:
174:
171:
169:
168:
161:
158:
157:
154:
152:
147:
140:
137:
134:
133:
132:
130:
129:rule of thumb
122:
120:
114:jack = 1 HCP
113:
111:queen = 2 HCP
110:
108:king = 3 HCP
107:
105:ace = 4 HCP
104:
103:
102:
100:
99:Charles Goren
96:
91:
89:
88:Auction Pitch
85:
81:
75:
67:
65:
63:
55:
53:
51:
47:
42:
40:
34:
30:
26:
22:
4677:TV and Radio
4665:
4658:
4651:
4644:
4621:
4614:
4607:
4600:
4593:
4586:
4579:
4572:
4565:
4558:
4536:
4293:Goren Trophy
4248:
4093:Bermuda Bowl
3629:Smith signal
3604:Opening lead
3568:
3559:Vice squeeze
3534:Squeeze play
3439:
3405:Devil's coup
3360:
3341:
3306:Smother play
3276:Pin (bridge)
3241:Card reading
3156:Säffle Spade
3151:Romex system
3126:Little Major
3035:Weak two bid
3030:Void (cards)
3015:Three suiter
2909:
2900:Forcing pass
2761:Masterpoints
2686:Bridge whist
2525:
2495:
2471:
2459:
2440:
2416:cite journal
2407:
2388:
2385:Klinger, Ron
2369:
2348:
2344:Klinger, Ron
2335:
2316:
2289:
2262:
2259:Cohen, Larry
2224:
2221:Rubens, Jeff
2200:
2186:0-7134-25431
2176:
2157:
2136:Basic Bridge
2135:
2132:Klinger, Ron
2123:
2098:
2062:
2025:
1994:
1968:
1949:
1927:
1918:
1909:
1900:
1879:
1870:
1864:
1843:
1834:
1825:
1813:
1792:
1728:
1710:
1703:
1685:
1682:
1677:
1673:
1668:
1660:
1659:In his book
1658:
1655:
1647:
1624:
1612:
1580:
1529:
1526:Quick Tricks
1520:quick tricks
1519:
1515:
1512:
1497:
1493:
1488:Total tricks
1487:
1483:
1482:states that
1479:
1473:
1467:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1423:
1419:
1416:
1410:
1401:
1387:
1386:In his book
1385:
1261:
1206:
1103:
1099:
1040:
990:
981:
966:
958:
949:
940:
926:
915:
901:
898:
861:
828:
824:
812:
797:
778:
774:
763:
689:
633:
632:
566:
565:
551:
547:
539:
530:
521:
517:
509:
495:
481:
470:
461:
447:
438:
427:
387:
385:
381:
378:ten = 0.25
361:
353:
340:
337:
324:
304:
302:
296:
293:
289:
233:
232:
166:
165:
148:
144:
126:
117:
92:
83:
77:
61:
59:
46:distribution
43:
36:
4224:Buffett Cup
3922:Crockford's
3891:Dallas Aces
3853:Other lists
3834:Switzerland
3804:New Zealand
3739:Netherlands
3435:Vienna coup
3356:Safety play
3175:Conventions
3136:Polish Club
3101:Carrot Club
3081:Boring Club
3005:Strong pass
2970:Psychic bid
2895:Forcing bid
2855:Bidding box
1665:Jeff Rubens
1392:Ron Klinger
1296:Ron Klinger
1258:LTC refined
815:Ron Klinger
329:Refinements
297:duplication
151:Jeff Rubens
123:Limitations
95:Milton Work
93:Called the
4723:Categories
4647:Magazines:
4338:Marcus Cup
4138:Venice Cup
3942:Savoy Club
3614:Rule of 11
3430:Trump coup
3146:Roman Club
3040:Zar Points
3020:Two suiter
3000:Stolen bid
2940:Minor suit
2935:Major suit
2766:Minibridge
2490:Root, Bill
2313:Cohen, Ben
2195:Root, Bill
1773:Root, 1998
1733:References
1644:Zar Points
1638:Zar Points
1050: A43
955:Rule of 19
946:Rule of 20
937:Rule of 22
642:A Q 9 8 5
629:K J 6 3 2
575:A Q 9 8 5
562:K J 6 3 2
4633:Magazines
4413:Reisinger
3896:Four Aces
3886:Blue Team
3699:Australia
3442:Squeezes:
3375:Bath coup
3231:Beer card
3204:Card play
3076:Blue Club
2691:Bridgette
2368:— (2009)
2327:560654187
2223:(1971) .
1938:Citations
1303:doubleton
1276:doubleton
702:Controls
4443:Spingold
3814:Pakistan
3719:Bulgaria
3321:Uppercut
3301:Shooting
3111:Fantunes
2950:Overcall
2905:Game try
2639:Overview
2492:(1986).
2470:(1998).
2439:(1983).
2410:(8): 26.
2346:(1986).
2281:92080759
2261:(1992).
2197:(1998).
2156:(2006).
2122:(1935).
2097:(1949).
2087:49606900
2050:96188639
2013:40299643
1948:(2002).
1353:KJ10 = 1
1060: 4
700:Expected
664:7 5 4 3
597:7 5 4 3
284:8 7 6 5
278:A 4 3 2
256:K J 9 4
250:A Q 3 2
217:8 7 6 5
197:K Q 3 2
189:K J 9 4
162:A Q J 2
50:controls
4070:General
3779:Ireland
3769:Hungary
3764:Germany
3754:Fiction
3749:England
3734:Denmark
3714:Britain
3704:Austria
3661:General
3351:Finesse
3266:Hold up
3251:Endplay
3214:General
3131:Moscito
3049:Systems
2955:Preempt
2885:Cue bid
2838:General
2828:Bidding
2806:Vugraph
2736:Goulash
2701:Chicago
2649:General
1603:
1591:
1589:where 1
1575:
1563:
1551:
1539:
1367:
1355:
1338:
1326:
1319:
1307:
1292:
1280:
1198:
1186:
1182:
1170:
1163:
1151:
1147:
1135:
1128:
1116:
681:♣
675:♣
667:♦
661:♦
653:♥
647:♥
639:♠
626:♠
614:♣
608:♣
600:♦
594:♦
586:♥
580:♥
572:♠
559:♠
527:Summary
473:ruffing
420:
408:
319:control
281:♣
275:♣
267:♦
261:♦
253:♥
247:♥
242:K 10 3
239:♠
226:♠
214:♣
208:♣
200:♦
194:♦
186:♥
180:♥
175:K 10 3
172:♠
159:♠
4561:Books:
3839:Taiwan
3829:Sweden
3824:Russia
3819:Poland
3809:Norway
3799:Monaco
3794:Mexico
3784:Israel
3759:France
3724:Canada
3709:Brazil
3624:Signal
3363:Coups:
3344:Basic:
3291:Revoke
2781:Screen
2532:
2516:
2504:
2478:
2447:
2395:
2376:
2360:
2325:
2296:
2279:
2269:
2243:
2231:
2209:
2183:
2164:
2142:
2085:
2075:
2048:
2038:
2011:
2001:
1975:
1956:
1714:AK543
1697:KQJ54
1324:AQJ =
1211:AKxxx
1000:South
802:, the
684:K 4 3
656:K Q 3
617:K 4 3
589:K 5 3
430:Q.E.D.
229:A Q J
211:A 4 3
31:, and
4520:Books
4086:World
3905:Clubs
3879:Teams
3789:Italy
3774:India
3744:Egypt
3729:China
3311:Tempo
3256:Entry
3236:Caddy
2801:Trump
1991:EBUTA
1215:Axxx
997:North
747:17–18
731:12–13
3385:Coup
3296:Ruff
3246:Duck
3106:EHAA
3066:Acol
2791:Suit
2530:ISBN
2514:ISBN
2502:ISBN
2476:ISBN
2445:ISBN
2429:help
2393:ISBN
2374:ISBN
2358:ISBN
2323:OCLC
2294:ISBN
2277:LCCN
2267:ISBN
2241:ISBN
2229:ISBN
2207:ISBN
2181:ISBN
2162:ISBN
2140:ISBN
2083:OCLC
2073:ISBN
2046:LCCN
2036:ISBN
2009:OCLC
1999:ISBN
1973:ISBN
1954:ISBN
1726:542
1718:654
1693:A32
1689:QJ2
1627:Acol
1583:Acol
1266:and
678:A 5
670:Q 6
650:A 2
611:A 5
603:A 6
583:A 2
402:and
270:A J
264:K Q
203:A J
183:A Q
2354:122
1722:A2
1701:A3
1680:".
1625:An
1305:= 1
1301:Kx
1274:AQ
1219:Qx
1082:– 3
1074:, 1
1070:, 5
1066:, 1
715:7–8
697:HCP
82:in
4725::
2512:,
2420::
2418:}}
2414:{{
2408:74
2356:.
2311:;
2275:.
2239:,
2118:;
2114:;
2110:;
2081:.
2071:.
2044:.
2034:.
2007:.
1888:^
1852:^
1801:^
1778:^
1760:^
1740:^
1663:,
1522:.
1500:".
1486:.
1390:,
1278:=
1228::
758:7
755:20
750:6
742:5
739:15
734:4
726:3
723:10
718:2
710:1
428:—
398:,
394:,
48:,
27:,
23:,
2619:e
2612:t
2605:v
2538:.
2520:.
2510:.
2484:.
2462:.
2453:.
2431:)
2427:(
2401:.
2380:.
2366:.
2329:.
2302:.
2283:.
2237:.
2215:.
2189:.
2170:.
2148:.
2089:.
2052:.
2015:.
1981:.
1962:.
1724:♣
1720:♦
1716:♥
1712:♠
1706:♠
1699:♣
1695:♦
1691:♥
1687:♠
1600:2
1597:/
1594:1
1587:♣
1585:2
1572:2
1569:/
1566:1
1548:2
1545:/
1542:1
1537:1
1422:(
1373:.
1364:2
1361:/
1358:1
1350:.
1335:2
1332:/
1329:1
1316:2
1313:/
1310:1
1298:.
1289:2
1286:/
1283:1
1251:♥
1246:.
1244:♥
1237:♥
1226:♥
1221:♣
1217:♦
1213:♥
1209:♠
1195:2
1192:/
1189:1
1179:2
1176:/
1173:1
1160:2
1157:/
1154:1
1144:2
1141:/
1138:1
1125:2
1122:/
1119:1
1084:♦
1080:♠
1076:♣
1072:♦
1068:♥
1064:♠
1058:♣
1054:♦
1048:♥
1044:♠
1033:?
1027:♠
1025:4
1021:♦
1019:4
1013:♦
1011:3
1007:♠
1005:1
793:♠
789:♠
785:♠
781:♠
707:5
417:2
414:/
411:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.