Knowledge (XXG)

Holtzman Inkblot Technique

Source đź“ť

664:
reference groups have been established (e.g., schizophrenics, depressives, delinquents, neurotics, and alcoholics). The 6 factors representing the most important variables have proven useful in clinical applications of the HIT. A large number of studies have confirmed the technique's differential validity, supported by findings from longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural investigations. Several hundred studies have been published on the relationships between HIT variables and other measures of personality. Still other investigations of external validity have been conducted using physiological and behavioral measures as well as personality questionnaires. Results from studies using the German version of the HIT are summarized and recent advances with the HIT are discussed.
77: 36: 172: 303: 234: 663:
22 quantitative variables were developed covering most of the scoring categories and dimensions used with the Rorschach. High reliability coefficients have been reported in a large number of investigations. Although the HIT has been in clinical use for 25 yrs, norms for several important clinical
844: 837: 436:
the apparent primacy of color, including black, gray and white, as a response-determinate. score 0=no use of color, 1=secondary to form, 2=primary determinant with some form present, 3=primary determinant
830: 310:
The Holtzman Inkblot Test (HIT) was invented as an attempt to address some issues surrounding the Rorschach Inkblot Test. The HIT was used to assess the personal structure of the subject.
816:
Holtzman, W. H., & Swartz, J. D. (1983). The Holtzman Inkblot Technique: A review of 25 years of research. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4(3), 241–259.
451:
the apparent primacy of shading as response determinant. 0=no use of shading, 1=secondary to form, 2=used as primary determinant but some form is present, 3= primary determinant
892: 465:
the energy level of movement or potential movement ascribed to the percept, regardless of content. 0=none, 1=static potential, 2=casual, 3=dynamic, 4=violent movement
294:. The HIT is a standardized measurement. The Holtzman Inkblot Test was developed as an attempt to address some controversial issues surrounding the Rorschach test. 1028: 408:
the definiteness of the form of the concept reported, regardless of the goodness of fit to the inkblot. a 5-point scale with 0=very vague and 4=very specific
944: 49: 1038: 87: 882: 897: 887: 577:
degree of anxiety or fantasy content as indicated by emotions and attitudes, expressive behavior, symbolism, or cultural stereotypes of fear.
318:
The scoring includes 22 variables covering the aspects of the patient's response to the inkblot. Many different variables apply when scoring.
605:
reference to any protective covering, shell, membrane or skin that may be symbolically related to the perception of body image boundaries.
619:
concept that may be symbolic of an individual's feeling that his body exterior is of little protective value and can be easily penetrated
145: 117: 183:
about whether or not the technique is considered scientifically valid, and whether or not it is still used, and how the test is given.
1023: 730: 954: 877: 801: 770: 242:" book showing an inkblot and pointing out different areas. The text provides some example interpretations and how these are scored. 211: 63: 124: 917: 186: 55: 658:
Holtzman and Swartz (1983) undertook a review of 25 years of research on the standardization of the HIT. They reported that:
1069: 102: 131: 1033: 922: 1064: 113: 907: 902: 985: 972: 691: 1090: 1054: 1001: 681: 248: 1015: 380:
tendency to break down blot into smaller fragments. score 0=use of whole blot, 1=large area, 2=smaller area
716: 1059: 869: 861: 138: 822: 422:
the goodness of fit of the form of the precept to the form of the inkblot. Score 0=poor 1=fair, 2=good
366:
score 1 when subject returns inkblot to examiner without giving a scorable response; otherwise score 0
996: 696: 949: 352:
the time in seconds from the presentation of the inkblot to the beginning of the first response
912: 797: 793: 787: 766: 762: 756: 280: 94: 932: 287: 964: 734: 686: 306:
Holtzman inkblots interpretation are graded according to a number of pre-defined criteria.
284: 493:
score 1=organization of 2 or more adequately perceived blot elements into a larger whole
185:
Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the
981: 479:
degree of autistic, bizarre thinking evident in the response as rated on a five scale.
291: 1084: 977: 853: 276: 17: 254: 991: 857: 76: 676: 171: 302: 233: 301: 633:
overt concern for the symmetry-asymmetry feature of the inkblot.
647:
percept occurred at least 14% of the time among normal subjects
826: 165: 70: 29: 394:
score 1=true figure-ground reversals; score 0 otherwise
792:. San Francisco, California: Jossey-bass Inc. pp.  761:. San Francisco, California: Jossey-bass Inc. pp.  98: 283:
and colleagues. It was first introduced in 1961 as a
279:
aimed at detecting personality and was conceived by
1047: 1014: 963: 931: 868: 507:degree of human quality in the content of response 247: 226: 1039:Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) 733:. The Psychological Corporation. Archived from 661: 893:Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities 838: 8: 535:degree of "gut-like" quality in the content 103:introducing citations to additional sources 945:Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 731:"Children's IQ Test: Holtzman Inkblot Test" 64:Learn how and when to remove these messages 937: 845: 831: 823: 563:degree of abstract quality in the content 232: 1029:Luria–Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery 212:Learn how and when to remove this message 883:Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 549:degree of sexual quality in the content 521:degree of animal quality in the content 325: 93:Relevant discussion may be found on the 898:Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children 709: 591:signs of hostility or fantasy content 322:22 variables and abbreviations applied 223: 7: 1024:Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 789:Advances in Psychological Assessment 758:Advances in Psychological Assessment 888:Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales 240:Inkblot Perception and Personality 25: 955:Revised NEO Personality Inventory 878:Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 45:This article has multiple issues. 170: 86:relies largely or entirely on a 75: 34: 238:From Holtzman's original 1961 " 53:or discuss these issues on the 1070:Vineland Social Maturity Scale 1: 1034:Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure 923:Binet-Simon Intelligence Test 1065:Benton Visual Retention Test 918:Raven's Progressive Matrices 114:"Holtzman Inkblot Technique" 908:Differential Ability Scales 903:Cognitive Assessment System 27:Projective personality test 1107: 973:Thematic apperception test 692:Thematic Apperception Test 265:Holtzman Inkblot Technique 227:Holtzman Inkblot Technique 1055:Mental status examination 1002:Sentence completion tests 940: 473:Pathognomic Verbalization 231: 786:McRenolds, Paul (1975). 755:McRenolds, Paul (1975). 682:Picture Arrangement Test 1016:Neuropsychological test 719:, The Free Dictionary. 717:Holtzman Ink Blot Test 666: 307: 181:is missing information 1060:Wechsler Memory Scale 986:Holtzman inkblot test 305: 273:Holtzman Inkblot Test 271:), also known as the 18:Holtzman Inkblot Test 997:Animal Metaphor Test 697:Blacky Pictures Test 654:Test standardization 416:Form Appropriateness 99:improve this article 729:Holtzman, Wayne H. 950:16PF Questionnaire 870:Intelligence tests 308: 1078: 1077: 1010: 1009: 933:Personality tests 913:Ammons Quick Test 651: 650: 402:Form Definiteness 281:Wayne H. Holtzman 261: 260: 222: 221: 214: 204: 203: 164: 163: 149: 68: 16:(Redirected from 1098: 1091:Projective tests 965:Projective tests 938: 847: 840: 833: 824: 817: 814: 808: 807: 783: 777: 776: 752: 746: 745: 743: 742: 726: 720: 714: 326: 288:personality test 257: 236: 224: 217: 210: 199: 196: 190: 174: 166: 159: 156: 150: 148: 107: 79: 71: 60: 38: 37: 30: 21: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1074: 1043: 1006: 959: 927: 864: 860:evaluation and 851: 821: 820: 815: 811: 804: 785: 784: 780: 773: 754: 753: 749: 740: 738: 728: 727: 723: 715: 711: 706: 701: 687:Projective test 672: 667: 656: 324: 316: 300: 290:similar to the 253: 243: 218: 207: 206: 205: 200: 194: 191: 184: 175: 160: 154: 151: 108: 106: 92: 80: 39: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1104: 1102: 1094: 1093: 1083: 1082: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1031: 1026: 1020: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1005: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 982:Rorschach test 975: 969: 967: 961: 960: 958: 957: 952: 947: 941: 935: 929: 928: 926: 925: 920: 915: 910: 905: 900: 895: 890: 885: 880: 874: 872: 866: 865: 852: 850: 849: 842: 835: 827: 819: 818: 809: 802: 778: 771: 747: 721: 708: 707: 705: 702: 700: 699: 694: 689: 684: 679: 673: 671: 668: 660: 655: 652: 649: 648: 645: 642: 639: 635: 634: 631: 628: 625: 621: 620: 617: 614: 611: 607: 606: 603: 600: 597: 593: 592: 589: 586: 583: 579: 578: 575: 572: 569: 565: 564: 561: 558: 555: 551: 550: 547: 544: 541: 537: 536: 533: 530: 527: 523: 522: 519: 516: 513: 509: 508: 505: 502: 499: 495: 494: 491: 488: 485: 481: 480: 477: 474: 471: 467: 466: 463: 460: 457: 453: 452: 449: 446: 443: 439: 438: 434: 431: 428: 424: 423: 420: 417: 414: 410: 409: 406: 403: 400: 396: 395: 392: 389: 386: 382: 381: 378: 375: 372: 368: 367: 364: 361: 358: 354: 353: 350: 347: 344: 340: 339: 336: 333: 330: 323: 320: 315: 312: 299: 296: 292:Rorschach test 259: 258: 251: 245: 244: 237: 229: 228: 220: 219: 202: 201: 178: 176: 169: 162: 161: 97:. Please help 83: 81: 74: 69: 43: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1103: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1086: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1050: 1046: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1019: 1017: 1013: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 987: 983: 979: 978:Ink blot test 976: 974: 971: 970: 968: 966: 962: 956: 953: 951: 948: 946: 943: 942: 939: 936: 934: 930: 924: 921: 919: 916: 914: 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 875: 873: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854:Psychological 848: 843: 841: 836: 834: 829: 828: 825: 813: 810: 805: 803:0-87589-242-6 799: 795: 791: 790: 782: 779: 774: 772:0-87589-242-6 768: 764: 760: 759: 751: 748: 737:on 2012-01-08 736: 732: 725: 722: 718: 713: 710: 703: 698: 695: 693: 690: 688: 685: 683: 680: 678: 675: 674: 669: 665: 659: 653: 646: 643: 640: 637: 636: 632: 629: 626: 623: 622: 618: 615: 612: 609: 608: 604: 601: 598: 595: 594: 590: 587: 584: 581: 580: 576: 573: 570: 567: 566: 562: 559: 556: 553: 552: 548: 545: 542: 539: 538: 534: 531: 528: 525: 524: 520: 517: 514: 511: 510: 506: 503: 500: 497: 496: 492: 489: 486: 483: 482: 478: 475: 472: 469: 468: 464: 461: 458: 455: 454: 450: 447: 444: 441: 440: 435: 432: 429: 426: 425: 421: 418: 415: 412: 411: 407: 404: 401: 398: 397: 393: 390: 387: 384: 383: 379: 376: 373: 370: 369: 365: 362: 359: 356: 355: 351: 348: 346:Reaction Time 345: 342: 341: 337: 334: 331: 328: 327: 321: 319: 313: 311: 304: 297: 295: 293: 289: 286: 282: 278: 277:ink blot test 274: 270: 266: 256: 252: 250: 246: 241: 235: 230: 225: 216: 213: 198: 188: 182: 179:This article 177: 173: 168: 167: 158: 147: 144: 140: 137: 133: 130: 126: 123: 119: 116: â€“  115: 111: 110:Find sources: 104: 100: 96: 90: 89: 88:single source 84:This article 82: 78: 73: 72: 67: 65: 58: 57: 52: 51: 46: 41: 32: 31: 19: 812: 788: 781: 757: 750: 739:. Retrieved 735:the original 724: 712: 662: 657: 338:Description 317: 309: 272: 268: 264: 262: 239: 208: 192: 180: 155:October 2017 152: 142: 135: 128: 121: 109: 85: 61: 54: 48: 47:Please help 44: 1048:Other tests 992:Szondi test 858:psychiatric 613:Penetration 487:Integration 741:2011-09-27 704:References 677:Pareidolia 285:projective 125:newspapers 50:improve it 585:Hostility 360:Rejection 187:talk page 95:talk page 56:talk page 1085:Category 670:See also 557:Abstract 459:Movement 374:Location 332:Variable 275:, is an 195:May 2021 862:testing 794:246–247 641:Popular 627:Balance 599:Barrier 571:Anxiety 529:Anatomy 445:Shading 335:Abbrev. 314:Scoring 298:Purpose 255:D006698 139:scholar 800:  769:  515:Animal 141:  134:  127:  120:  112:  501:Human 430:Color 388:Space 146:JSTOR 132:books 856:and 798:ISBN 767:ISBN 616:(Pn) 602:(Br) 588:(Hs) 574:(Ax) 560:(Ab) 546:(Sx) 532:(At) 448:(Sh) 419:(FA) 405:(FD) 349:(RT) 263:The 249:MeSH 118:news 763:245 644:(P) 630:(B) 543:Sex 518:(A) 504:(H) 490:(I) 476:(V) 462:(M) 433:(C) 391:(S) 377:(L) 363:(R) 329:No. 269:HIT 101:by 1087:: 984:, 796:. 765:. 638:22 624:21 610:20 596:19 582:18 568:17 554:16 540:15 526:14 512:13 498:12 484:11 470:10 59:. 988:) 980:( 846:e 839:t 832:v 806:. 775:. 744:. 456:9 442:8 427:7 413:6 399:5 385:4 371:3 357:2 343:1 267:( 215:) 209:( 197:) 193:( 189:. 157:) 153:( 143:· 136:· 129:· 122:· 105:. 91:. 66:) 62:( 20:)

Index

Holtzman Inkblot Test
improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages

single source
talk page
improve this article
introducing citations to additional sources
"Holtzman Inkblot Technique"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR

talk page
Learn how and when to remove this message

MeSH
D006698
ink blot test
Wayne H. Holtzman
projective
personality test
Rorschach test

Pareidolia
Picture Arrangement Test
Projective test

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑