37:, Johnson contrasts two views of development. According to the first, the maturational hypothesis, the relationship between structure and function (i.e. which parts of the brain perform a particular task) is static, and specific cognitive skills come “on-line” as the cortical circuitry intrinsic to a particular task matures. Johnson likens this to a "mosaic" view of development.
75:, which argues against a strong nativist (innate) view on development. Other key influences include Gilbert Gottlieb's theory of Probabilistic Epigenesis , a framework that emphasizes the reciprocity and ubiquity of gene-environment interaction in the realization of all phenotypes, and work on developmental disorders by
41:
being built according to a pre-specified genetic blueprint - rather, the components of the brain are interacting with each other constantly - even prenatally, when patterns of spontaneous firing of cells in the eyes (before they have opened) transmit signals that appear to help develop the layered structure of the
40:
According to the second, the
Interactive Specialization (IS) hypothesis, development is not a unidirectional maturational process, but rather a set of complex, dynamic and back-propagated interactions between genetics, brain, body and environment. Development is not a simple question of a brain
48:
The hypothesis has attracted increasing attention in recent years as a number of neuroimaging studies on younger children have provided data that appears to fit specific predictions made by
Johnson's model .
349:
215:
Redcay E.; Haist F.; Courchesne E. (2008). "Paper: Functional neuroimaging of speech perception during a pivotal period in language acquisition".
62:
172:
O'Leary D.D.M; Nakagawa Y. (2002). "Patterning centers, regulatory genes and extrinsic mechanisms controlling arealization of the neocortex".
298:
121:
250:
Amso D.; Casey B.J. (2006). "Paper: Beyond what develops when: neuroimaging may inform how cognition changes with development".
27:
137:
Johnson, M.H. (2000). "Functional brain development in infants: Elements of an interactive specialization framework".
23:
42:
76:
368:
343:
71:
267:
197:
22:
is a theory of brain development proposed by the
British developmental cognitive neuroscientist
331:
294:
232:
189:
154:
117:
323:
259:
224:
181:
146:
66:
373:
185:
362:
327:
287:
263:
228:
58:
271:
201:
150:
335:
236:
193:
158:
30:, London and who is now Head of Psychology at the University of Cambridge.
26:, formerly head of the Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development at
314:
Gottlieb, G., Lickliter, R. (2007). "FProbabilistic epigenesis".
289:
Rethinking
Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development
95:
96:"Home | Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development"
286:
69:, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett), the book
107:
105:
8:
348:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
114:Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd Ed
252:Current Directions in Psychological Science
87:
341:
7:
285:Elman, Jeffrey; et al. (1996).
35:Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
57:In 1996, Johnson co-authored (with
14:
328:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00556.x
264:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00400.x
229:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00674.x
116:. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
174:Current Opinion in Neurobiology
28:Birkbeck, University of London
1:
186:10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00285-4
293:. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16:Theory of brain development
390:
43:lateral geniculate nucleus
20:Interactive Specialization
151:10.1111/1467-8624.00120
77:Annette Karmiloff-Smith
63:Annette Karmiloff-Smith
112:Johnson, Mark (2005).
316:Developmental Science
217:Developmental Science
72:Rethinking Innateness
300:978-0-262-55030-7
139:Child Development
123:978-1-4051-2629-8
381:
354:
353:
347:
339:
311:
305:
304:
292:
282:
276:
275:
247:
241:
240:
212:
206:
205:
169:
163:
162:
134:
128:
127:
109:
100:
99:
92:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
359:
358:
357:
340:
313:
312:
308:
301:
284:
283:
279:
249:
248:
244:
214:
213:
209:
171:
170:
166:
136:
135:
131:
124:
111:
110:
103:
94:
93:
89:
85:
67:Elizabeth Bates
55:
17:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
377:
376:
371:
361:
360:
356:
355:
306:
299:
277:
242:
223:(2): 237–252.
207:
164:
129:
122:
101:
86:
84:
81:
54:
51:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
375:
372:
370:
367:
366:
364:
351:
345:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
310:
307:
302:
296:
291:
290:
281:
278:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
246:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
211:
208:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
168:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
133:
130:
125:
119:
115:
108:
106:
102:
97:
91:
88:
82:
80:
78:
74:
73:
68:
64:
60:
59:Jeffrey Elman
52:
50:
46:
44:
38:
36:
31:
29:
25:
21:
369:Neuroscience
344:cite journal
319:
315:
309:
288:
280:
258:(1): 24–28.
255:
251:
245:
220:
216:
210:
180:(1): 14–25.
177:
173:
167:
145:(1): 75–81.
142:
138:
132:
113:
90:
70:
56:
47:
39:
34:
33:In his book
32:
24:Mark Johnson
19:
18:
322:(1): 1–11.
363:Categories
83:References
53:Influences
336:17181692
272:16622362
237:18333980
202:15149973
194:11861160
159:10836560
334:
297:
270:
235:
200:
192:
157:
120:
374:Brain
268:S2CID
198:S2CID
350:link
332:PMID
295:ISBN
233:PMID
190:PMID
155:PMID
118:ISBN
324:doi
260:doi
225:doi
182:doi
147:doi
365::
346:}}
342:{{
330:.
320:10
318:.
266:.
256:15
254:.
231:.
221:11
219:.
196:.
188:.
178:12
176:.
153:.
143:71
141:.
104:^
79:.
65:,
61:,
45:.
352:)
338:.
326::
303:.
274:.
262::
239:.
227::
204:.
184::
161:.
149::
126:.
98:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.