Knowledge (XXG)

Interpersonal circumplex

Source đź“ť

84:
Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000) is a measure of problems associated with each octant of the interpersonal circumplex, whereas the Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths (IIS; Hatcher & Rogers, 2009) is a measure of strengths associated with each octant. The Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values (CSIV; Locke, 2000) is a 64-item measure of the value individuals place on interpersonal experiences associated with each octant of the interpersonal circumplex. The Person's Relating to Others Questionnaire (PROQ), the latest version being the PROQ3 is a 48-item measure developed by the British doctor John Birtchnell. Finally, the Impact Message Inventory-Circumplex (IMI; Kiesler, Schmidt, & Wagner, 1997) assesses the interpersonal dispositions of a target person, not by asking the target person directly, but by assessing the feelings, thoughts, and behaviors that the target evokes in another person. Since interpersonal dispositions are key features of most
17: 131:
Furthermore, the Leary Circumplex also represents a kind of bull's eye of healthy psychological adjustment. Theoretically speaking, the most well-adjusted person of the planet could have their personality mapped at the exact center of the circumplex, right at the intersection of the two axes, while
83:
designed to measure these eight interpersonal circumplex octants. For example, the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS; Wiggins, 1995) is a measure of interpersonal traits associated with each octant of the interpersonal circumplex. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP; Horowitz, Alden,
127:
Leary argued that all other dimensions of personality can be viewed as a blending of these two axes. For example, a person who is stubborn and inflexible in their personal relationships might graph her personality somewhere on the arc between dominance and love. However, a person who exhibits
68:
Placing a person near one of the poles of the axes implies that the person tends to convey clear or strong messages (of warmth, hostility, dominance or submissiveness). Conversely, placing a person at the midpoint of the agentic dimension implies the person conveys neither dominance nor
124:. His circumplex, developed in 1957, is a circular continuum of personality formed from the intersection of two base axes: Power and Love. The opposing sides of the power axis are dominance and submission, while the opposing sides of the love axis are love and hate (Wiggins, 1996). 135:
The Leary Circumplex offers three major benefits as a taxonomy. It offers a map of interpersonal traits within a geometric circle. It allows for comparison of different traits within the system. It provides a scale of healthy and unhealthy expressions of each trait.
76:(such as fourths) or narrow segments (such as sixteenths), but currently most interpersonal circumplex inventories partition the circle into eight octants. As one moves around the circle, each octant reflects a progressive blend of the two axial dimensions. 69:
submissiveness (and pulls neither dominance nor submissiveness from others). Likewise, placing a person at the midpoint of the communal dimension implies the person conveys neither warmth nor hostility (and pulls neither warmth nor hostility from others).
115:
In the 20th century, there were a number of efforts by personality psychologists to create comprehensive taxonomies to describe the most important and fundamental traits of human nature. Leary would later become famous for his controversial
128:
passive–aggressive tendencies might find herself best described on the arc between submission and hate. The main idea of the Leary Circumplex is that each and every human trait can be mapped as a vector coordinate within this circle.
396:
Kiesler, D.J., Schmidt, J.A. & Wagner, C.C. (1997). A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotional and interpersonal behavior. In R. Plutchik & H.R. Conte (Eds.),
20:
The Interpersonal Circumplex is a taxonomy of interpersonal personality traits and behaviours. The circumplex consists of orthogonal dimensions and concentric circles indicating the level of intensity
309:(2006). "Distinctions Among Agency, Communion, and Unmitigated Agency and Communion According to the Interpersonal Circumplex, Five-Factor Model, and Social-Emotional Correlates". 414:
Locke, K.D. (2000). Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders.
760: 364:
Hatcher, R.L., & Rogers, D.T. (2009). Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal strengths: The Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths.
453: 348: 794: 544: 60:
and communion. Thus, each point in the interpersonal circumplex space can be specified as a weighted combination of agency and communion.
646: 631: 289: 88:, interpersonal circumplex measures can be useful tools for identifying or differentiating personality disorders (Kiesler, 1996; 145: 593: 203: 799: 744: 56:). In recent years, it has become conventional to identify the vertical and horizontal axes with the broad constructs of 41: 446: 695: 576: 486: 471: 581: 710: 586: 804: 752: 716: 439: 161: 767: 166: 85: 723: 155: 150: 132:
individuals exhibiting extremes in personality would be located on the circumference of the circle.
674: 639: 609: 383: 700: 494: 112:
is defined as "a two-dimensional representation of personality organized around two major axes".
80: 510: 502: 391:
Contemporary Interpersonal Theory and Research: Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy
344: 326: 285: 239: 199: 45: 158: â€“ creator of the similar Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) circumplex model 730: 614: 318: 277: 231: 73: 222:
Wiggins, Jerry S. (1996). "An Informal History of the Interpersonal Circumplex Tradition".
52:(of agreeableness, compassion, nurturant, solidarity, friendliness, warmth, affiliation or 690: 49: 16: 528: 788: 737: 669: 462: 404: 343:
Personality Psychology. Randy J. Larsen och David M. Buss. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill.
109: 89: 37: 33: 772: 57: 29: 28:
is a model for conceptualizing, organizing, and assessing interpersonal behavior,
32:, and motives. The interpersonal circumplex is defined by two orthogonal axes: a 322: 306: 235: 705: 421:
Locke, K.D. (2006). Interpersonal circumplex measures. In S. Strack (Ed.),
330: 243: 487:
The Psychedelic Experience: A Manual Based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead
664: 401:(pp. 221–244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 378:
Horowitz, L.M., Alden, L.E., Wiggins, J.S., & Pincus, A.L. (2000).
121: 281: 259:
The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion
15: 431: 53: 435: 117: 72:
The interpersonal circumplex can be divided into broad
276:. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 375:. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 683: 657: 623: 602: 569: 553: 537: 521: 478: 48:, ambitiousness, assertiveness, or control) and a 425:(2nd Ed., pp. 383–400). New York: Springer. 423:Differentiating normal and abnormal personality 447: 399:Circumplex models of personality and emotions 217: 215: 8: 373:Interpersonal Foundations of Psychopathology 274:Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology 761:Dying to Know: Ram Dass & Timothy Leary 454: 440: 432: 380:Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual 189: 187: 183: 409:Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality 196:Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality 416:Journal of Personality Assessment, 75 7: 545:Eight-circuit model of consciousness 647:You Can Be Anyone This Time Around 14: 311:Journal of Personality Assessment 224:Journal of Personality Assessment 261:. Oxford, England: Rand McNally. 146:Circumplex model of group tasks 594:League for Spiritual Discovery 1: 384:The Psychological Corporation 272:Horowitz, Leonard M. (2004). 366:Psychological Assessment, 21 24:The interpersonal circle or 795:Interpersonal relationships 323:10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_09 823: 696:Turn on, tune in, drop out 632:Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out 577:Harvard Psilocybin Project 236:10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_2 582:Concord Prison Experiment 469: 411:. New York: Ronald Press. 79:There exist a variety of 561:Interpersonal circumplex 26:interpersonal circumplex 587:Marsh Chapel Experiment 371:Horowitz, L.M. (2004). 753:The Sekhmet Hypothesis 717:Leary v. United States 389:Kiesler, D.J. (1996). 162:Personality psychology 92:, 1957; Locke, 2006). 21: 768:Joanna Harcourt-Smith 257:Bakan, David (1966). 167:Unmitigated communion 86:personality disorders 19: 800:Psychological models 724:Tomorrow Never Knows 711:Leary–Lettvin debate 198:. New York: Ronald. 156:Lorna Smith Benjamin 151:Interpersonal reflex 675:Robert Anton Wilson 640:Give Peace a Chance 610:Zihuatanejo Project 81:psychological tests 764:(2014 documentary) 748:(1983 documentary) 701:Question authority 393:. New York: Wiley. 100:Originally coined 22: 782: 781: 745:Return Engagement 349:978-0-07-110168-4 282:10.1037/10727-000 194:Leary, T (1957). 812: 731:Legend of a Mind 642:" (1969, vocals) 456: 449: 442: 433: 352: 341: 335: 334: 302: 296: 295: 269: 263: 262: 254: 248: 247: 219: 210: 209: 191: 102:Leary Circumplex 64:Character traits 822: 821: 815: 814: 813: 811: 810: 809: 785: 784: 783: 778: 691:Set and setting 679: 653: 619: 598: 565: 549: 533: 517: 474: 465: 460: 429: 361: 356: 355: 342: 338: 304: 303: 299: 292: 271: 270: 266: 256: 255: 251: 221: 220: 213: 206: 193: 192: 185: 180: 175: 142: 120:experiments at 98: 66: 50:horizontal axis 12: 11: 5: 820: 819: 816: 808: 807: 802: 797: 787: 786: 780: 779: 777: 776: 770: 765: 757: 749: 741: 734: 727: 720: 713: 708: 703: 698: 693: 687: 685: 681: 680: 678: 677: 672: 667: 661: 659: 655: 654: 652: 651: 643: 636: 627: 625: 621: 620: 618: 617: 612: 606: 604: 600: 599: 597: 596: 591: 590: 589: 584: 573: 571: 567: 566: 564: 563: 557: 555: 551: 550: 548: 547: 541: 539: 535: 534: 532: 531: 529:Reality tunnel 525: 523: 519: 518: 516: 515: 507: 499: 491: 482: 480: 476: 475: 470: 467: 466: 461: 459: 458: 451: 444: 436: 427: 426: 419: 412: 402: 394: 387: 382:. Odessa, FL: 376: 369: 360: 357: 354: 353: 336: 297: 290: 264: 249: 230:(2): 217–233. 211: 204: 182: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 170: 169: 164: 159: 153: 148: 141: 138: 97: 94: 65: 62: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 818: 817: 806: 805:Timothy Leary 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 792: 790: 775:(goddaughter) 774: 771: 769: 766: 763: 762: 758: 755: 754: 750: 747: 746: 742: 740:" (1969 song) 739: 738:Come Together 735: 733:" (1968 song) 732: 728: 726:" (1966 song) 725: 721: 719: 718: 714: 712: 709: 707: 704: 702: 699: 697: 694: 692: 689: 688: 686: 682: 676: 673: 671: 670:Ralph Metzner 668: 666: 663: 662: 660: 658:Collaborators 656: 649: 648: 644: 641: 637: 634: 633: 629: 628: 626: 622: 616: 613: 611: 608: 607: 605: 601: 595: 592: 588: 585: 583: 580: 579: 578: 575: 574: 572: 568: 562: 559: 558: 556: 552: 546: 543: 542: 540: 536: 530: 527: 526: 524: 520: 513: 512: 508: 505: 504: 500: 497: 496: 492: 489: 488: 484: 483: 481: 477: 473: 468: 464: 463:Timothy Leary 457: 452: 450: 445: 443: 438: 437: 434: 430: 424: 420: 417: 413: 410: 407:, T. (1957). 406: 403: 400: 395: 392: 388: 385: 381: 377: 374: 370: 367: 363: 362: 358: 350: 346: 340: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 305:Ghaed, S.G.; 301: 298: 293: 291:9781591470816 287: 283: 279: 275: 268: 265: 260: 253: 250: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 218: 216: 212: 207: 201: 197: 190: 188: 184: 177: 172: 168: 165: 163: 160: 157: 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 143: 139: 137: 133: 129: 125: 123: 119: 113: 111: 110:Timothy Leary 107: 103: 95: 93: 91: 87: 82: 77: 75: 70: 63: 61: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 34:vertical axis 31: 27: 18: 773:Winona Ryder 759: 751: 743: 715: 650:(1970 album) 645: 635:(1967 album) 630: 560: 509: 501: 493: 485: 472:Bibliography 428: 422: 415: 408: 398: 390: 379: 372: 365: 339: 317:(1): 77–88. 314: 310: 300: 273: 267: 258: 252: 227: 223: 195: 134: 130: 126: 114: 106:Leary Circle 105: 101: 99: 78: 71: 67: 25: 23: 756:(1995 book) 603:Communities 495:High Priest 307:Gallo, L.C. 789:Categories 538:Philosophy 511:Flashbacks 503:Neurologic 418:, 249–267. 368:, 544-569. 205:1592447767 173:References 706:Ego death 615:Millbrook 351:(ISE)P.80 42:dominance 665:Ram Dass 570:Research 522:Theories 331:16436022 244:16367700 140:See also 74:segments 684:Related 359:General 122:Harvard 96:History 554:Models 514:(1983) 506:(1973) 498:(1968) 490:(1964) 347:  329:  288:  242:  202:  108:after 58:agency 38:status 30:traits 624:Music 479:Books 405:Leary 178:Cited 90:Leary 46:power 345:ISBN 327:PMID 286:ISBN 240:PMID 200:ISBN 54:love 36:(of 319:doi 278:doi 232:doi 118:LSD 104:or 791:: 325:. 315:86 313:. 284:. 238:. 228:66 226:. 214:^ 186:^ 44:, 40:, 736:" 729:" 722:" 638:" 455:e 448:t 441:v 386:. 333:. 321:: 294:. 280:: 246:. 234:: 208:.

Index


traits
vertical axis
status
dominance
power
horizontal axis
love
agency
segments
psychological tests
personality disorders
Leary
Timothy Leary
LSD
Harvard
Circumplex model of group tasks
Interpersonal reflex
Lorna Smith Benjamin
Personality psychology
Unmitigated communion


ISBN
1592447767


doi
10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_2
PMID

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑