490:
36:
202:, can become relevant. For example, Microsoft products are distinguished in the marketplace by a consistent font. Competitors may not use the same font on their product, particularly when using a name which would not be confusingly similar except for the use of the font. For example, a brand called "
190:
in these terms, it would need to establish that any trade names or trademarks which include these terms is confusingly similar to "Microsoft". The reputation attaching to a trademark is also significant, such that "Microsafe" or "Micro
Software", although clearly not identical, could potentially be
174:
Where mark X is not identical to a registered trademark, the use of mark X may still amount to an infringement if it is "confusingly similar" to the registered trademark. Mark X may share elements of spelling or style that would lead a reasonable observer to believe the trademarks were related.
519:
163:
233:
confusion caused by would-be candidates deliberately choosing similar names to confuse the electorate, hence potentially affecting the outcome of an election. For example, in three instances in the
504:
624:
206:" would most likely not be confused with Microsoft. However if Microsystems used the same font as Microsoft, it would be confusingly similar. Some styles, like the script used on
817:
217:
which show that members of the public who are likely to use the services or goods protected by the trade mark have been confused by it. However, courts can also take
693:
534:
807:
812:
524:
186:
and trade mark that other businesses in the industry may want to use the term "micro" or "soft" in their names. As
Microsoft generally does not hold
797:
366:
953:
889:
827:
53:
874:
565:
802:
261:
119:
439:
100:
419:
143:
is a test used during the examination process to determine whether a trademark conflicts with another, earlier mark, and also in
72:
822:
708:
210:
products, are so well known that even a completely different name in a similar script could be held to be confusingly similar.
257:
57:
79:
879:
600:
444:
294:
331:
688:
884:
869:
843:
605:
409:
359:
268:
86:
272:
948:
718:
434:
301:
245:), and two instances of candidates standing for the 'Conservatory' party and the 'Conversative' party (against the
46:
550:
389:
68:
615:
595:
703:
570:
307:
246:
974:
943:
930:
915:
647:
585:
560:
555:
429:
352:
242:
144:
580:
979:
590:
464:
746:
678:
632:
575:
529:
848:
683:
449:
93:
910:
905:
731:
668:
394:
288:
214:
726:
399:
250:
853:
736:
509:
264:
238:
203:
221:
that an infringing mark is confusingly similar if it is obvious to even a casual observer.
925:
920:
751:
741:
514:
474:
312:
218:
187:
673:
469:
454:
414:
276:
234:
17:
968:
459:
147:
proceedings to determine whether the use of a mark infringes a registered trademark.
637:
151:
642:
404:
35:
698:
335:
183:
479:
375:
230:
207:
179:
133:
271:. The seat was also being contested by the incumbent MP and leader of the
652:
199:
253:
and the candidates had to stand using more distinguishable party names.
772:
237:
during 1994–5: a candidate attempting to stand as a member of the '
767:
164:
Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
777:
344:
195:
348:
267:
ran a candidate by the name of Maxime
Bernier in the riding of
136:
29:
898:
862:
836:
790:
760:
717:
661:
623:
614:
543:
497:
382:
191:confusingly similar and amount to an infringement.
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
249:candidate). All candidatures were rejected by the
194:In addition, the style of a trade mark, such as a
154:this test has been superseded by the concepts of
535:Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy
360:
8:
620:
367:
353:
345:
213:Cases of this type can be proven by using
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
162:, due to the harmonizing effects of the
332:"Byelections in the 1992-97 Parliament"
323:
178:For example, in the computer industry,
27:Test used during trademark examination
7:
58:adding citations to reliable sources
803:International Trademark Association
25:
488:
34:
823:Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
709:Protected designation of origin
45:needs additional citations for
258:2019 Canadian Federal Election
241:' party (in the UK there is a
1:
854:Unregistered trademark symbol
689:Electronic registration marks
295:Apple Corps v. Apple Computer
182:has become such a well known
844:Registered trademark symbol
996:
435:Initial interest confusion
302:Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
939:
486:
273:People's Party of Canada
704:Geographical indication
308:Counteraction principle
243:Liberal Democrats Party
160:likelihood of confusion
18:Likelihood of confusion
944:Category:Trademark law
931:World Trademark Review
916:Trademark infringement
648:Unregistered trademark
430:Functionality doctrine
229:There are examples of
145:trademark infringement
69:"Confusing similarity"
679:Collective trademarks
465:Reputation parasitism
420:Coexistence agreement
684:Defensive trademarks
633:Registered trademark
530:Community Trade Mark
480:Well-known trademark
425:Confusing similarity
141:confusing similarity
54:improve this article
890:Washington Redskins
849:Service mark symbol
732:Hologram trademarks
669:Certification marks
450:Secondary liability
440:Good faith doctrine
911:Trademark examiner
906:Trademark attorney
289:A moron in a hurry
247:Conservative Party
962:
961:
954:WP:MOS/Trademarks
786:
785:
737:Motion trademarks
727:Colour trademarks
400:Generic trademark
251:Returning Officer
130:
129:
122:
104:
16:(Redirected from
987:
752:Sound trademarks
747:Shape trademarks
742:Scent trademarks
719:Non-conventional
621:
525:Singapore Treaty
510:Madrid Agreement
505:Paris Convention
492:
491:
369:
362:
355:
346:
340:
339:
334:. Archived from
328:
265:Rhinoceros Party
239:Literal Democrat
188:exclusive rights
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
38:
30:
21:
995:
994:
990:
989:
988:
986:
985:
984:
965:
964:
963:
958:
935:
926:Trademark troll
921:Trademark share
894:
858:
832:
782:
756:
713:
674:Chartered marks
657:
610:
539:
515:Madrid Protocol
493:
489:
484:
475:Parallel import
390:Distinctiveness
378:
373:
343:
330:
329:
325:
321:
313:Richard Huggett
285:
227:
225:In election law
219:judicial notice
172:
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
51:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
993:
991:
983:
982:
977:
967:
966:
960:
959:
957:
956:
951:
946:
940:
937:
936:
934:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
902:
900:
896:
895:
893:
892:
887:
882:
877:
875:Debian–Mozilla
872:
866:
864:
860:
859:
857:
856:
851:
846:
840:
838:
834:
833:
831:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
794:
792:
788:
787:
784:
783:
781:
780:
775:
770:
764:
762:
758:
757:
755:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
723:
721:
715:
714:
712:
711:
706:
701:
696:
694:Font trademark
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
665:
663:
659:
658:
656:
655:
650:
645:
640:
635:
629:
627:
618:
612:
611:
609:
608:
603:
601:United Kingdom
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
566:European Union
563:
558:
553:
547:
545:
541:
540:
538:
537:
532:
527:
522:
517:
512:
507:
501:
499:
495:
494:
487:
485:
483:
482:
477:
472:
470:Cybersquatting
467:
462:
457:
455:Nominative use
452:
447:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
417:
415:Priority right
412:
410:Concurrent use
407:
402:
397:
392:
386:
384:
380:
379:
374:
372:
371:
364:
357:
349:
342:
341:
338:on 1999-11-11.
322:
320:
317:
316:
315:
310:
305:
298:
291:
284:
281:
277:Maxime Bernier
235:United Kingdom
226:
223:
171:
168:
128:
127:
42:
40:
33:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
992:
981:
978:
976:
975:Trademark law
973:
972:
970:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
941:
938:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
903:
901:
897:
891:
888:
886:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
871:
868:
867:
865:
861:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
841:
839:
835:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
795:
793:
789:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
763:
759:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
724:
722:
720:
716:
710:
707:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
666:
664:
660:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
630:
628:
626:
622:
619:
617:
613:
607:
606:United States
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
548:
546:
542:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
513:
511:
508:
506:
503:
502:
500:
496:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
460:Disparagement
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
387:
385:
381:
377:
376:Trademark law
370:
365:
363:
358:
356:
351:
350:
347:
337:
333:
327:
324:
318:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
303:
299:
297:
296:
292:
290:
287:
286:
282:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
259:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
224:
222:
220:
216:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
192:
189:
185:
181:
176:
169:
167:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:jurisdictions
148:
146:
142:
138:
135:
124:
121:
113:
110:December 2007
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
49:
48:
43:This article
41:
37:
32:
31:
19:
980:Election law
662:Non-standard
638:Service mark
424:
336:the original
326:
300:
293:
255:
228:
212:
204:Microsystems
193:
177:
173:
170:Infringement
159:
155:
149:
140:
131:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
64:
52:Please help
47:verification
44:
880:Stolichnaya
699:Ghost marks
643:Trade dress
596:Philippines
405:Passing off
969:Categories
319:References
184:trade name
156:similarity
80:newspapers
949:Case laws
885:Ugg boots
870:Budweiser
571:Hong Kong
551:Australia
262:satirical
231:electoral
208:Coca-Cola
180:Microsoft
134:trademark
863:Disputes
653:Wordmark
625:Standard
498:Treaties
445:Fair use
395:Dilution
383:Concepts
283:See also
150:In many
899:Related
837:Symbols
761:Related
581:Ireland
544:Country
256:In the
215:surveys
94:scholar
791:Bodies
773:Emblem
556:Canada
269:Beauce
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
818:ICANN
813:USPTO
808:EUIPO
768:Brand
616:Types
586:Japan
576:India
561:China
520:TRIPS
101:JSTOR
87:books
828:CIPO
798:WIPO
778:Logo
591:Oman
260:the
200:font
196:logo
158:and
73:news
198:or
137:law
132:In
56:by
971::
279:.
275:,
166:.
139:,
368:e
361:t
354:v
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
