Knowledge (XXG)

Monoplane

Source đź“ť

53: 433: 186: 254:(a category between high-wing and mid-wing) is a configuration whereby the wing is mounted near the top of the fuselage but not on the very top. It is so called because it sits on the "shoulder" of the fuselage, rather than on the pilot's shoulder. Shoulder-wings and high-wings share some characteristics, namely: they support a pendulous fuselage which requires no wing dihedral for stability; and, by comparison with a low-wing, a shoulder-wing's limited 38: 86: 313: 304:, the wing is usually located above the cabin, so that the wing spar passes over the occupants' heads, leaving the wing in the ideal fore-aft position. An advantage of the high-wing configuration is that the fuselage is closer to the ground which eases cargo loading, especially for aircraft with a rear-fuselage cargo door. Military cargo aircraft are predominantly high-wing designs with a rear cargo door. 71: 394: 239: 476:
Nonetheless, relatively few monoplane types were built between 1914 and the late 1920s, compared with the number of biplanes. The reasons for this were primarily practical. With the low engine powers and airspeeds available, the wings of a monoplane needed to be large in order to create enough lift
258:
reduces float on landing. Compared to a low-wing, shoulder-wing and high-wing configurations give increased propeller clearance on multi-engined aircraft. On a large aircraft, there is little practical difference between a shoulder wing and a high wing; but on a light aircraft, the configuration is
153:
can be used to improve structural efficiency, reducing weight and cost. For a wing of a given size, the weight reduction allows it to fly slower and with a lower-powered and more economical engine. For this reason, all monoplane wings in the pioneer era were braced and most were up until the early
514:
demonstrator in 1915–16 — they became common during the post–World War I period, the day of the braced wing passed, and by the 1930s, the cantilever monoplane was fast becoming the standard configuration for a fixed-wing aircraft. Advanced monoplane fighter-aircraft designs were mass-produced for
128:
and is the simplest to build. However, during the early years of flight, these advantages were offset by its greater weight and lower manoeuvrability, making it relatively rare until the 1930s. Since then, the monoplane has been the most common form for a fixed-wing aircraft.
472:
fighter from its former "E.V" designation. However, the success of the Fokker was short-lived, and World War I was dominated by biplanes. Towards the end of the war, the parasol monoplane became popular and successful designs were produced into the 1920s.
334:
The first parasol monoplanes were adaptations of shoulder wing monoplanes, since raising a shoulder mounted wing above the fuselage greatly improved visibility downwards, which was useful for reconnaissance roles, as with the widely used
299:
has its upper surface on or above the top of the fuselage. It shares many advantages and disadvantages with the shoulder wing, but on a light aircraft, the high wing has poorer upwards visibility. On light aircraft such as the
492:
with a shallow hull, a parasol wing allows the engines to be mounted above the spray from the water when taking off and landing. This arrangement was popular on flying boats during the 1930s; a late example being the
480:
Towards the end of the First World War, the inherent high drag of the biplane was beginning to restrict performance. Engines were not yet powerful enough to make the heavy cantilever-wing monoplane viable, and the
203:
Placing the wing low allows good visibility upwards and frees the central fuselage from the wing spar carry-through. By reducing pendulum stability, it makes the aircraft more manoeuvrable, as on the
354:
A parasol wing also provides a high mounting point for engines and during the interwar period was popular on flying boats, which need to lift the propellers clear of spray. Examples include the
146:
wing, which carries all structural forces internally. However, to fly at practical speeds the wing must be made thin, which requires a heavy structure to make it strong and stiff enough.
409:
at heavier-than-air flying machines were monoplanes, and many pioneers continued to develop monoplane designs. For example, the first aeroplane to be put into production was the 1907
230:
is mounted midway up the fuselage. The carry-through spar structure can reduce the useful fuselage volume near its centre of gravity, where space is often in most demand.
259:
significant because it offers superior visibility to the pilot. On light aircraft, shoulder-wings tend to be mounted further aft than a high wing, and so may need to be
815: 807: 659: 173:
such as tail position and use of bracing, the main distinction between types of monoplane is where the wing is mounted vertically on the
461: 789: 704: 154:
1930s. However, the exposed struts or wires create additional drag, lowering aerodynamic efficiency and reducing the maximum speed.
537:
Jet and rocket engines have even more power and all modern high-speed aircraft, especially supersonic types, have been monoplanes.
497:. It died out when taller hulls became the norm during World War II, allowing a high wing to be attached directly to the hull. 485:
became popular on fighter aircraft, although few arrived in time to see combat. It remained popular throughout the 1920s.
157:
High-speed and long-range designs tend to be pure cantilevers, while low-speed short-range types are often given bracing.
836: 255: 218:, giving the plane a tendency to float farther before landing. Conversely, this ground effect permits shorter takeoffs. 215: 546: 515:
military services around the world in both the Soviet Union and the United States in the early–mid 1930s, with the
494: 453: 363: 410: 398: 118: 520: 208: 811: 803: 406: 328: 150: 96: 339:. The parasol wing allows for an efficient design with good pilot visibility, and was adopted for some 432: 331:
or a pylon. Additional bracing may be provided by struts or wires extending from the fuselage sides.
317: 204: 190: 59: 44: 52: 831: 382: 110: 378: 374: 348: 260: 170: 125: 651: 534:
were monoplanes, as have been virtually all aircraft since, except for a few specialist types.
185: 785: 700: 655: 527: 336: 264: 77: 643: 340: 597: 37: 516: 445: 418: 373:, a parasol wing has less bracing and lower drag. It remains a popular configuration for 457: 272: 312: 85: 825: 644: 505: 469: 426: 422: 414: 359: 344: 92: 531: 500:
As ever-increasing engine powers made the weight of all-metal construction and the
355: 280: 456:
fighter of 1915 which for a time dominated the skies in what became known as the "
393: 70: 618: 477:
while a biplane could have two smaller wings and so be made smaller and lighter.
508: 489: 437: 327:
is not directly attached to the fuselage but held above it, supported by either
276: 501: 301: 268: 243: 143: 572: 207:; but aircraft that value stability over manoeuvrability may then need some 174: 124:
A monoplane has inherently the highest efficiency and lowest drag of any
238: 17: 511: 370: 114: 504:
wing more practical — first pioneered together by the revolutionary
431: 392: 311: 237: 184: 142:
The inherent efficiency of the monoplane is best achieved in the
200:
is one which is located on or near the bottom of the fuselage.
429:
monoplane, eventually reaching 1,384 m (4,541 ft).
267:. Examples of light aircraft with shoulder wings include the 464:
prior to 1918 prefixed monoplane type designations with an
405:
Although the first successful aircraft were biplanes, the
784:. Mountain View, CA: Flying Machines Press. p. 315. 113:
configuration with a single mainplane, in contrast to a
686:
Trevor Thom – The Aeroplane (Technical) – 1997 page 65
214:
A feature of the low-wing position is its significant
699:, page 379. Aviation Supplies & Academics, 1997. 440:
monoplane pioneered all-metal construction in 1915.
401:
was the first production monoplane (replica shown).
27:Fixed-wing aircraft with a single main wing plane 697:Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms, third edition 8: 637: 635: 780:Davilla, James J.; Soltan, Arthur (1997). 351:in the later part of the First World War. 774:World Aircraft: Origins–World War I 724:Angelucci and Matricardi, pp. 151, 290-1. 563: 782:French Aircraft of the First World War 759:Angelucci and Matricardi, pp. 109-129. 650:. Cambridge University Press. p.  425:set multiple altitude records in his 7: 571:Loftin, Lawrence K. (January 1985). 772:Angelucci, A.; and Matricardi, P.; 462:Idflieg aircraft designation system 642:Ajoy Kumar Kundu (12 April 2010). 600:. Aviation-history.com. 2009-11-30 169:Besides the general variations in 25: 735:Historical Dictionary of Aviation 482: 737:, History Press, 2008, pp.214-5. 84: 69: 51: 36: 421:in 1909. Throughout 1909–1910, 246:, showing good pilot visibility 715:Davilla, 1997, pp.60 & 315 677:magazine February 1986 page 32 121:, which have multiple planes. 1: 468:, until the approval of the 598:"Ground Effect in Aircraft" 853: 547:Aspect ratio (aeronautics) 78:de Havilland Canada Dash 8 495:Consolidated PBY Catalina 364:Consolidated PBY Catalina 411:Santos-Dumont Demoiselle 399:Santos-Dumont Demoiselle 798:"High wing, low wing", 621:. Avweb.com. 2003-10-22 460:". The German military 521:Boeing P-26 Peashooter 441: 402: 320: 247: 193: 802:20 March 1975, Pages 452:, as in the mid-wing 435: 396: 315: 241: 188: 97:Supermarine Air Yacht 776:, Sampson Low, 1977. 318:Pietenpol Air Camper 263:to maintain correct 242:Shoulder wing on an 60:de Havilland Vampire 45:Supermarine Spitfire 837:Wing configurations 483:braced parasol wing 383:ultralight aircraft 111:fixed-wing aircraft 442: 403: 349:Morane-Saulnier AI 321: 316:Parasol wing on a 248: 194: 171:wing configuration 138:Support and weight 126:wing configuration 117:or other types of 661:978-1-139-48745-0 528:military aircraft 337:Morane-Saulnier L 265:center of gravity 16:(Redirected from 844: 795: 760: 757: 751: 744: 738: 731: 725: 722: 716: 713: 707: 693: 687: 684: 678: 672: 666: 665: 649: 639: 630: 629: 627: 626: 615: 609: 608: 606: 605: 594: 588: 587: 585: 583: 568: 454:Fokker Eindecker 417:flew across the 291: 290: 165: 164: 91:Parasol wing on 88: 73: 55: 40: 21: 852: 851: 847: 846: 845: 843: 842: 841: 822: 821: 792: 779: 769: 764: 763: 758: 754: 745: 741: 732: 728: 723: 719: 714: 710: 694: 690: 685: 681: 673: 669: 662: 646:Aircraft Design 641: 640: 633: 624: 622: 619:"Ground Effect" 617: 616: 612: 603: 601: 596: 595: 591: 581: 579: 570: 569: 565: 560: 555: 543: 517:Polikarpov I-16 446:German language 444:The equivalent 419:English Channel 391: 310: 293: 288: 287: 236: 224: 183: 167: 162: 161: 140: 135: 133:Characteristics 103: 102: 101: 100: 99: 89: 81: 80: 76:High wing on a 74: 65: 64: 63: 56: 48: 47: 41: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 850: 848: 840: 839: 834: 824: 823: 820: 819: 796: 791:978-1891268090 790: 777: 768: 765: 762: 761: 752: 739: 733:Wragg, David; 726: 717: 708: 688: 679: 667: 660: 631: 610: 589: 562: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 550: 549: 542: 539: 523:respectively. 458:Fokker scourge 407:first attempts 390: 387: 369:Compared to a 309: 306: 292: 285: 235: 232: 223: 220: 189:Low wing on a 182: 179: 166: 159: 139: 136: 134: 131: 90: 83: 82: 75: 68: 67: 66: 58:Mid wing on a 57: 50: 49: 43:Low wing on a 42: 35: 34: 33: 32: 31: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 849: 838: 835: 833: 830: 829: 827: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 787: 783: 778: 775: 771: 770: 766: 756: 753: 749: 743: 740: 736: 730: 727: 721: 718: 712: 709: 706: 705:1-56027-287-2 702: 698: 695:Crane, Dale: 692: 689: 683: 680: 676: 671: 668: 663: 657: 653: 648: 647: 638: 636: 632: 620: 614: 611: 599: 593: 590: 578: 574: 567: 564: 557: 552: 548: 545: 544: 540: 538: 535: 533: 529: 524: 522: 518: 513: 510: 507: 503: 498: 496: 491: 486: 484: 478: 474: 471: 470:Fokker D.VIII 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 439: 434: 430: 428: 427:Antoinette IV 424: 423:Hubert Latham 420: 416: 412: 408: 400: 395: 388: 386: 384: 380: 376: 372: 367: 365: 361: 360:Dornier Do 18 357: 352: 350: 346: 345:Fokker D.VIII 342: 338: 332: 330: 329:cabane struts 326: 319: 314: 307: 305: 303: 298: 286: 284: 282: 278: 274: 273:Bölkow Junior 270: 266: 262: 261:swept forward 257: 256:ground effect 253: 252:shoulder wing 245: 240: 233: 231: 229: 221: 219: 217: 216:ground effect 212: 210: 206: 201: 199: 192: 187: 180: 178: 176: 172: 163:Wing position 160: 158: 155: 152: 147: 145: 137: 132: 130: 127: 122: 120: 116: 112: 108: 98: 94: 93:R.J. Mitchell 87: 79: 72: 61: 54: 46: 39: 30: 19: 799: 781: 773: 767:Bibliography 755: 747: 742: 734: 729: 720: 711: 696: 691: 682: 674: 670: 645: 623:. Retrieved 613: 602:. Retrieved 592: 580:. Retrieved 576: 566: 536: 525: 499: 490:flying boats 487: 479: 475: 465: 449: 443: 413:, while the 404: 368: 356:Martin M-130 353: 343:such as the 333: 325:parasol wing 324: 322: 296: 294: 281:Barber Snark 251: 249: 227: 225: 213: 202: 197: 195: 191:Curtiss P-40 168: 156: 148: 141: 123: 106: 104: 29: 509:Junkers J 1 438:Junkers J 1 277:Saab Safari 119:multiplanes 832:Monoplanes 826:Categories 748:Windkiller 625:2012-07-19 604:2012-07-19 582:16 January 553:References 502:cantilever 415:BlĂ©riot XI 377:and small 375:amphibians 302:Cessna 152 269:ARV Super2 244:ARV Super2 144:cantilever 750:, p. 227. 558:Citations 450:Eindecker 379:homebuilt 297:high wing 149:External 107:monoplane 577:nasa.gov 541:See also 519:and the 448:term is 362:and the 341:fighters 279:and the 234:Shoulder 228:mid wing 209:dihedral 205:Spitfire 198:low wing 175:fuselage 95:'s 1930 18:Low-wing 816:archive 808:archive 573:"ch4-3" 512:factory 389:History 371:biplane 308:Parasol 151:bracing 115:biplane 800:Flight 788:  746:King, 703:  658:  506:German 271:, the 675:Pilot 526:Most 109:is a 786:ISBN 701:ISBN 656:ISBN 584:2016 532:WWII 436:The 397:The 381:and 347:and 289:High 812:454 804:453 530:of 488:On 222:Mid 181:Low 62:T11 828:: 810:)– 654:. 652:78 634:^ 575:. 385:. 366:. 358:, 323:A 295:A 283:. 275:, 250:A 226:A 211:. 196:A 177:. 105:A 818:) 814:( 806:( 794:. 664:. 628:. 607:. 586:. 466:E 20:)

Index

Low-wing

Supermarine Spitfire

de Havilland Vampire

de Havilland Canada Dash 8

R.J. Mitchell
Supermarine Air Yacht
fixed-wing aircraft
biplane
multiplanes
wing configuration
cantilever
bracing
wing configuration
fuselage

Curtiss P-40
Spitfire
dihedral
ground effect

ARV Super2
ground effect
swept forward
center of gravity
ARV Super2
Bölkow Junior

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑