Knowledge (XXG)

Phrase structure rules

Source 📝

510:. What this means is that for phrase structure rules to be applicable at all, one has to pursue a constituency-based understanding of sentence structure. The constituency relation is a one-to-one-or-more correspondence. For every word in a sentence, there is at least one node in the syntactic structure that corresponds to that word. The dependency relation, in contrast, is a one-to-one relation; for every word in the sentence, there is exactly one node in the syntactic structure that corresponds to that word. The distinction is illustrated with the following trees: 416: 535:. Here phrase structures are not derived from rules that combine words, but from the specification or instantiation of syntactic schemata or configurations, often expressing some kind of semantic content independently of the specific words that appear in them. This approach is essentially equivalent to a system of phrase structure rules combined with a non 453:, etc.). These transformations are not strictly required for generation, as the sentences they produce could be generated by a suitably expanded system of phrase structure rules alone, but transformations provide greater economy and enable significant relations between sentences to be reflected in the grammar. 461:
An important aspect of phrase structure rules is that they view sentence structure from the top down. The category on the left of the arrow is a greater constituent and the immediate constituents to the right of the arrow are lesser constituents. Constituents are successively broken down into their
374:
Beginning with the sentence symbol S, and applying the phrase structure rules successively, finally applying replacement rules to substitute actual words for the abstract symbols, it is possible to generate many proper sentences of English (or whichever language the rules are specified for). If the
522:
The constituency tree on the left could be generated by phrase structure rules. The sentence S is broken down into smaller and smaller constituent parts. The dependency tree on the right could not, in contrast, be generated by phrase structure rules (at least not as they are commonly interpreted).
401:
as an illustration that phrase structure rules are capable of generating syntactically correct but semantically incorrect sentences. Phrase structure rules break sentences down into their constituent parts. These constituents are often represented as
470:
merges smaller constituents to create greater constituents until the greatest constituent (i.e. the sentence) is reached. In this regard, theoretical syntax abandoned phrase structure rules long ago, although their importance for
516: 531:
A number of representational phrase structure theories of grammar never acknowledged phrase structure rules, but have pursued instead an understanding of sentence structure in terms the notion of
342: 462:
parts as one moves down a list of phrase structure rules for a given sentence. This top-down view of sentence structure stands in contrast to much work done in modern theoretical syntax. In
269: 218: 445:, systems of phrase structure rules are supplemented by transformation rules, which act on an existing syntactic structure to produce a new one (performing such operations as 117: 605: 183: 163: 143: 422:
A constituent is any word or combination of words that is dominated by a single node. Thus each individual word is a constituent. Further, the subject NP
515: 542:
theory, since grammatical formalisms based on rewriting rules are generally equivalent in power to those based on substitution into schemata.
389: 578: 812: 751:
Falk, Y. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
650:
For general discussions of phrase structure rules, see for instance Borsley (1991:34ff.), Brinton (2000:165), Falk (2001:46ff.).
545:
So in this type of approach, instead of being derived from the application of a number of phrase structure rules, the sentence
610: 435: 807: 275: 615: 792: 782: 415: 719: 787: 582: 595: 472: 224: 123: 59: 625: 497: 442: 75: 63: 55: 31: 718:Ágel, V., Ludwig Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Heringer, and Hennig Lobin (eds.) 2003/6. 434:
are constituents. Phrase structure rules and the tree structures that are associated with them are a form of
191: 446: 348: 573:
Though they are non-compositional, such models are monotonic. This approach is highly developed within
574: 368: 488:
Phrase structure rules as they are commonly employed result in a view of sentence structure that is
375:
rules are correct, then any sentence produced in this way ought to be grammatically (syntactically)
549:
would be generated by filling the words into the slots of a schema having the following structure:
532: 467: 92: 363:) followed by a N (noun). The third rule means that a N (noun) can be preceded by an optional AP ( 630: 600: 502: 463: 69: 43: 797: 536: 364: 802: 376: 168: 148: 128: 47: 776: 659:
Dependency grammars are associated above all with the work of Lucien Tesnière (1959).
450: 398: 379:. It is also to be expected that the rules will generate syntactically correct but 35: 23: 762: 755: 739: 732: 466:
for instance, sentence structure is generated from the bottom up. The operation
356: 352: 58:. Phrase structure rules as they are commonly employed operate according to the 725:
Borsley, R. 1991. Syntactic theory: A unified approach. London: Edward Arnold.
407: 403: 360: 695:
Concerning Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, see Pollard and Sag (1994).
677:
The most comprehensive source on dependency grammar is Ágel et al. (2003/6).
539: 380: 62:
relation, and a grammar that employs phrase structure rules is therefore a
748:
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
720:
Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research
39: 768:
Tesnière, L. 1959. Éleménts de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
620: 359:). The second rule reads: A noun phrase consists of an optional Det ( 51: 27: 54:
categories. A grammar that uses phrase structure rules is a type of
585:, the latter two clearly qualifying as phrase structure grammars. 383:
nonsensical sentences, such as the following well-known example:
745:
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
756:
Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language
410:). The tree for Chomsky's sentence can be rendered as follows: 704:
Concerning Lexical Functional Grammar, see Bresnan (2001).
561:
And which would express the following conceptual content:
86:
Phrase structure rules are usually of the following form:
318: 290: 257: 492:. Thus, grammars that employ phrase structure rules are 16:
Rewrite rule used to describe a given language's syntax
371:). The round brackets indicate optional constituents. 686:
Concerning Construction Grammar, see Goldberg (2006).
337:{\displaystyle {\ce {N1->(AP)\quad N1\quad (PP)}}} 278: 227: 194: 171: 151: 131: 95: 30:
and are closely associated with the early stages of
42:sentence into its constituent parts, also known as 606:Discontinuous-constituent phrase structure grammar 336: 263: 212: 177: 157: 137: 111: 735:. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 38:in 1957. They are used to break down a natural 728:Bresnan, Joan 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax. 8: 742:, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 264:{\displaystyle {\ce {NP->(Det)\quad N1}}} 185:. Some examples for English are as follows: 145:is separated into the two subconstituents 322: 317: 312: 296: 289: 284: 279: 277: 256: 251: 235: 228: 226: 195: 193: 170: 150: 130: 94: 213:{\displaystyle {\ce {S->NP\quad VP}}} 765:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 643: 547:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously 390:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously 46:, including both lexical categories ( 7: 763:Head-driven phrase structure grammar 579:Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar 68:; as such, it stands in contrast to 26:used to describe a given language's 506:, which view sentence structure as 367:) and followed by an optional PP ( 14: 740:Syntax: A Generative Introduction 397:This sentence was constructed by 668:See for instance Chomsky (1995). 514: 414: 733:The structure of modern English 321: 307: 246: 205: 105: 611:Immediate constituent analysis 577:and has had some influence in 436:immediate constituent analysis 329: 323: 303: 297: 293: 242: 236: 232: 199: 99: 1: 761:Pollard, C. and I. Sag 1994. 112:{\displaystyle A\to B\quad C} 722:. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 616:Non-configurational language 567:X DOES Y IN THE MANNER OF Z 484:Constituency vs. dependency 347:The first rule reads: A S ( 829: 758:. Oxford University Press. 583:lexical functional grammar 527:Representational grammars 498:phrase structure grammars 473:computational linguistics 74:, which are based on the 626:Phrase structure grammar 475:seems to remain intact. 443:transformational grammar 56:phrase structure grammar 32:transformational grammar 813:Syntactic relationships 82:Definition and examples 479:Alternative approaches 338: 265: 214: 179: 159: 139: 113: 20:Phrase structure rules 494:constituency grammars 424:Colorless green ideas 339: 266: 215: 180: 160: 140: 114: 808:Syntactic categories 575:Construction grammar 369:prepositional phrase 355:) followed by a VP ( 351:) consists of a NP ( 276: 225: 192: 169: 149: 129: 93: 65:constituency grammar 44:syntactic categories 754:Goldberg, A. 2006. 503:dependency grammars 320: 292: 259: 71:dependency grammars 793:Syntactic theories 783:Grammar frameworks 731:Brinton, L. 2000. 631:Syntactic category 601:Dependency grammar 490:constituency-based 334: 308: 280: 261: 247: 210: 175: 155: 135: 109: 788:Generative syntax 738:Carnie, A. 2013. 500:), as opposed to 328: 311: 302: 283: 250: 241: 231: 208: 204: 198: 178:{\displaystyle C} 158:{\displaystyle B} 138:{\displaystyle A} 122:meaning that the 820: 705: 702: 696: 693: 687: 684: 678: 675: 669: 666: 660: 657: 651: 648: 518: 508:dependency-based 418: 365:adjective phrase 343: 341: 340: 335: 333: 332: 326: 319: 316: 309: 306: 300: 291: 288: 281: 270: 268: 267: 262: 260: 258: 255: 248: 245: 239: 229: 219: 217: 216: 211: 209: 206: 202: 196: 184: 182: 181: 176: 164: 162: 161: 156: 144: 142: 141: 136: 118: 116: 115: 110: 828: 827: 823: 822: 821: 819: 818: 817: 773: 772: 771: 714: 709: 708: 703: 699: 694: 690: 685: 681: 676: 672: 667: 663: 658: 654: 649: 645: 640: 635: 591: 529: 486: 481: 459: 432:sleep furiously 426:, the minor NP 404:tree structures 274: 273: 223: 222: 190: 189: 167: 166: 147: 146: 127: 126: 91: 90: 84: 48:parts of speech 17: 12: 11: 5: 826: 824: 816: 815: 810: 805: 800: 795: 790: 785: 775: 774: 770: 769: 766: 759: 752: 749: 746: 743: 736: 729: 726: 723: 715: 713: 710: 707: 706: 697: 688: 679: 670: 661: 652: 642: 641: 639: 636: 634: 633: 628: 623: 618: 613: 608: 603: 598: 592: 590: 587: 571: 570: 569: 568: 559: 558: 557: 556: 528: 525: 520: 519: 485: 482: 480: 477: 458: 455: 420: 419: 395: 394: 393: 392: 345: 344: 331: 325: 315: 305: 299: 295: 287: 271: 254: 244: 238: 234: 220: 201: 174: 154: 134: 120: 119: 108: 104: 101: 98: 83: 80: 34:, proposed by 22:are a type of 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 825: 814: 811: 809: 806: 804: 801: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 780: 778: 767: 764: 760: 757: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 737: 734: 730: 727: 724: 721: 717: 716: 711: 701: 698: 692: 689: 683: 680: 674: 671: 665: 662: 656: 653: 647: 644: 637: 632: 629: 627: 624: 622: 619: 617: 614: 612: 609: 607: 604: 602: 599: 597: 594: 593: 588: 586: 584: 580: 576: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 548: 543: 541: 538: 537:compositional 534: 526: 524: 517: 513: 512: 511: 509: 505: 504: 499: 495: 491: 483: 478: 476: 474: 469: 465: 456: 454: 452: 451:passivization 448: 444: 439: 437: 433: 430:, and the VP 429: 425: 417: 413: 412: 411: 409: 405: 400: 391: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 382: 378: 372: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 313: 285: 272: 252: 221: 188: 187: 186: 172: 152: 132: 125: 106: 102: 96: 89: 88: 87: 81: 79: 77: 73: 72: 67: 66: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 21: 700: 691: 682: 673: 664: 655: 646: 572: 560: 546: 544: 530: 521: 507: 501: 493: 489: 487: 460: 440: 431: 427: 423: 421: 399:Noam Chomsky 396: 381:semantically 373: 346: 121: 85: 70: 64: 60:constituency 36:Noam Chomsky 24:rewrite rule 19: 18: 596:Constituent 428:green ideas 408:dendrograms 357:verb phrase 353:noun phrase 124:constituent 777:Categories 712:References 464:Minimalism 361:determiner 78:relation. 76:dependency 294:⟶ 233:⟶ 200:⟶ 100:→ 589:See also 540:semantic 457:Top down 447:negation 349:sentence 40:language 798:Phrases 377:correct 52:phrasal 803:Syntax 621:Phrase 555:VP AP] 533:schema 50:) and 28:syntax 638:Notes 468:Merge 581:and 165:and 496:(= 441:In 240:Det 779:: 449:, 438:. 327:PP 301:AP 230:NP 207:VP 203:NP 406:( 330:) 324:( 314:1 310:N 304:) 298:( 286:1 282:N 253:1 249:N 243:) 237:( 197:S 173:C 153:B 133:A 107:C 103:B 97:A

Index

rewrite rule
syntax
transformational grammar
Noam Chomsky
language
syntactic categories
parts of speech
phrasal
phrase structure grammar
constituency
constituency grammar
dependency grammars
dependency
constituent
sentence
noun phrase
verb phrase
determiner
adjective phrase
prepositional phrase
correct
semantically
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously
Noam Chomsky
tree structures
dendrograms
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
immediate constituent analysis
transformational grammar
negation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.