Knowledge (XXG)

R v Sharpe

Source đź“ť

40: 241:
In its ruling the Supreme Court emphasized the interest of the government to prevent the proliferation of child pornography and upheld its prohibition (reversing the decision to strike down the statute at-large), while also recognizing the importance of "adolescent self-fulfillment,
260:
Ultimately, after the case was remitted, Sharpe received a four-month conditional house arrest sentence, in issuing the sentence Shaw noted "In the eyes of many he has become a pariah, endured six years of this court case and has no criminal record".
242:
self-actualization and sexual exploration and identity." -(Paragraph 109) and that also commentated "To ban the possession of our own private musings thus falls perilously close to criminalizing the mere articulation of thought. " -(Paragraph 108).
251:
2.  Private recordings of lawful sexual activity: i.e., any visual recording, created by or depicting the accused, provided it does not depict unlawful sexual activity and is held by the accused exclusively for private use." -(Paragraph 115).
248:"1. Self-created expressive material: i.e., any written material or visual representation created by the accused alone, and held by the accused alone, exclusively for his or her own personal use; and 429: 179: 434: 184: 449: 205:
After police seized 517 photographs mostly of young boys, as well as sexually explicit stories; John Robin Sharpe was charged on two counts of
464: 351: 459: 454: 320: 206: 194: 213:
placed an unreasonable limitation on his freedom of expression, and in a ruling the British Columbia Court of Appeal concurred;
474: 469: 439: 281: 189:
holding, that while general prohibition of child pornography was constitutional, there were some limits imposed by the
209:, and on another two counts of possession with intent to distribute. Sharpe argued that the relevant provision of the 175: 104: 225:. Before its eventual reexamination by the Supreme Court, the decision invited protest, with more than half of the 230: 406: 167: 45: 210: 444: 307: 39: 226: 414: 214: 375: 97: 357: 347: 316: 171: 120: 218: 108: 410: 112: 423: 128: 116: 71: 132: 217:
ruled that the law was a "profound invasion" of the freedom of expression and
124: 361: 306:
Social Action Commission of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (May 2002).
147:
McLachin (paras 1–130), joined by Iacobucci, Major, Binnie, Arbour, and LeBel
17: 245:
Ultimately the court carved out two exceptions to the power, and law:
315:(3rd Revised ed.). Markham, Ontario: Faith Today Publications. 380: 344:
Human Rights in an Information Age : A Philosophical Analysis
309:
Innocence Preserved: Protecting Children From Child Pornography
166:, 2001 SCC 2 is a constitutional rights decision of the 155:
L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, and Bastarache (paras 131–243)
170:. The court balanced the societal interest to regulate 151: 143: 138: 88: 80: 70: 60: 53: 32: 282:"Sharpe sentenced in B.C. child pornography case" 430:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law 331:– via Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. 8: 193:. The decision overturned a ruling by the 84:Appeal allowed, charges remitted to trial 65:Her Majesty The Queen v John Robin Sharpe 346:. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 435:Canadian freedom of expression case law 270: 185:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 29: 7: 276: 274: 178:possessed by the defendants under 25: 27:2001 Supreme Court of Canada case 195:British Columbia Court of Appeal 38: 207:possession of child pornography 1: 450:Supreme Court of Canada cases 54:Hearing: January 18, 19 2000 465:Section Two Charter case law 342:Walters, Gregory J. (2001). 491: 460:Canadian criminal case law 376:"R. v. Sharpe - SCC Cases" 56:Judgment: January 26, 2001 455:2001 in Canadian case law 93: 37: 407:Supreme Court of Canada 168:Supreme Court of Canada 46:Supreme Court of Canada 409:decision available at 475:Canadian juvenile law 470:Pornography in Canada 440:Child pornography law 227:Members of Parliament 176:freedom of expression 174:against the right to 105:Claire L'Heureux-DubĂ© 76:2001 SCC 2, 1 SCR 45 215:Justice Duncan Shaw 98:Beverley McLachlin 353:978-1-44267-592-6 172:child pornography 159: 158: 121:Michel Bastarache 16:(Redirected from 482: 393: 392: 390: 389: 372: 366: 365: 339: 333: 332: 330: 329: 314: 303: 297: 296: 294: 293: 278: 229:petitioning the 219:right to privacy 109:Charles Gonthier 102:Puisne Justices: 89:Court membership 42: 30: 21: 490: 489: 485: 484: 483: 481: 480: 479: 420: 419: 402: 397: 396: 387: 385: 374: 373: 369: 354: 341: 340: 336: 327: 325: 323: 312: 305: 304: 300: 291: 289: 280: 279: 272: 267: 258: 239: 203: 113:Frank Iacobucci 100: 55: 49: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 488: 486: 478: 477: 472: 467: 462: 457: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 422: 421: 418: 417: 401: 400:External links 398: 395: 394: 384:. January 2001 367: 352: 334: 321: 298: 269: 268: 266: 263: 257: 254: 238: 235: 233:to intervene. 231:Prime Minister 202: 199: 157: 156: 153: 149: 148: 145: 141: 140: 136: 135: 95:Chief Justice: 91: 90: 86: 85: 82: 78: 77: 74: 68: 67: 62: 61:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 43: 35: 34: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 487: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 431: 428: 427: 425: 416: 412: 408: 405:Full text of 404: 403: 399: 383: 382: 377: 371: 368: 363: 359: 355: 349: 345: 338: 335: 324: 322:0-9730621-1-8 318: 311: 310: 302: 299: 288:. May 3, 2002 287: 283: 277: 275: 271: 264: 262: 255: 253: 249: 246: 243: 236: 234: 232: 228: 224: 221:found in the 220: 216: 212: 211:criminal code 208: 200: 198: 196: 192: 188: 186: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 154: 150: 146: 142: 139:Reasons given 137: 134: 130: 129:Louise Arbour 126: 122: 118: 117:John C. Major 114: 110: 106: 103: 99: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 52: 48: 47: 41: 36: 31: 19: 445:Sex case law 386:. Retrieved 379: 370: 343: 337: 326:. Retrieved 308: 301: 290:. Retrieved 285: 259: 250: 247: 244: 240: 222: 204: 190: 183: 162: 161: 160: 101: 94: 64: 44: 18:R. v. Sharpe 152:Concurrence 133:Louis LeBel 424:Categories 388:2019-01-01 328:2019-01-01 292:2019-01-01 265:References 201:Background 163:R v Sharpe 125:Ian Binnie 33:R v Sharpe 362:666910377 256:Aftermath 180:section 2 72:Citations 286:CBC News 144:Majority 237:Holding 223:Charter 191:Charter 182:of the 415:CanLII 360:  350:  319:  81:Ruling 411:LexUM 381:LexUM 313:(PDF) 413:and 358:OCLC 348:ISBN 317:ISBN 426:: 378:. 356:. 284:. 273:^ 197:. 131:, 127:, 123:, 119:, 115:, 111:, 107:, 391:. 364:. 295:. 187:; 20:)

Index

R. v. Sharpe
Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
Beverley McLachlin
Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
Charles Gonthier
Frank Iacobucci
John C. Major
Michel Bastarache
Ian Binnie
Louise Arbour
Louis LeBel
Supreme Court of Canada
child pornography
freedom of expression
section 2
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
British Columbia Court of Appeal
possession of child pornography
criminal code
Justice Duncan Shaw
right to privacy
Members of Parliament
Prime Minister


"Sharpe sentenced in B.C. child pornography case"
Innocence Preserved: Protecting Children From Child Pornography
ISBN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑