433:
128:. A landmark case in UK privacy law, the case brought these types of injunction under scrutiny and caused government concern about the injunctions and how they are used. The injunction was released on
267:
383:
402:
253:
474:
508:
293:
222:
503:
412:
208:
260:
493:
326:
125:
298:
121:
29:
498:
467:
240:
518:
288:
159:
460:
361:
207:(2017). "Power, Interdependence, and Hybridity in the Construction of Political News: Understanding WikiLeaks".
303:
61:
347:
309:
214:
407:
513:
368:
80:
57:
397:
218:
444:
186:
136:
MP brought up the topic during
Parliamentary Questions and the publication of the report on
204:
333:
487:
245:
133:
432:
190:
440:
177:
Hall, Holly
Kathleen (June 2013). "Super-Injunction, What's Your Function?".
340:
137:
117:
249:
72:
Lord Browne of
Madingley v. Associated Newspapers Ltd. QB 103
40:
RJW and SJW v. Guardian News and Media Ltd and Person(s)
448:
390:
378:
318:
281:
91:
86:
76:
68:
53:
45:
35:
25:
20:
384:List of privacy injunction cases in English law
468:
261:
8:
403:2011 British privacy injunctions controversy
210:The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
109:Trafigura v Guardian News and Media Limited
475:
461:
268:
254:
246:
124:to prevent the press reporting details of
17:
160:"How the Trafigura story came to be told"
151:
126:toxic waste dumping in the Ivory Coast
103:RJW v Guardian News and Media Limited
21:RJW v Guardian News and Media Limited
7:
429:
427:
116:, was a 2009 legal action in which
447:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
276:Privacy injunctions in English law
14:
355:RJW v Guardian News and Media Ltd
327:CTB v. News Group Newspapers Ltd.
106:( EWHC 2540 (QB)), also known as
431:
509:2009 in United Kingdom case law
30:High Court of England and Wales
1:
191:10.1080/10811680.2013.797305
179:Communication Law and Policy
504:High Court of Justice cases
213:(Second ed.). Oxford:
535:
426:
362:Andrew Marr and anonymous
494:English privacy case law
439:This article related to
304:Contra mundum injunction
348:Terry v Persons Unknown
310:Interdicts in Scots law
215:Oxford University Press
408:Privacy in English law
379:Anonymised injunctions
319:Super-injunction cases
294:Anonymised injunctions
499:Mass media in England
369:NMC v Persons Unknown
81:Human Rights Act 1988
413:Breach of confidence
217:. pp. 103–129.
398:Neuberger Committee
241:High Court judgment
120:attempted to use a
166:. 16 October 2009.
519:English law stubs
456:
455:
421:
420:
299:Super-injunctions
224:978-0-19-069673-3
99:
98:
77:Legislation cited
49:11 September 2009
526:
477:
470:
463:
435:
428:
270:
263:
256:
247:
229:
228:
205:Chadwick, Andrew
201:
195:
194:
174:
168:
167:
156:
122:super-injunction
87:Court membership
18:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
484:
483:
482:
481:
424:
422:
417:
386:
374:
314:
277:
274:
237:
232:
225:
203:
202:
198:
176:
175:
171:
158:
157:
153:
149:
143:
12:
11:
5:
532:
530:
522:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
486:
485:
480:
479:
472:
465:
457:
454:
453:
436:
419:
418:
416:
415:
410:
405:
400:
394:
392:
388:
387:
382:
380:
376:
375:
373:
372:
365:
358:
351:
344:
337:
334:Ntuli v Donald
330:
322:
320:
316:
315:
313:
312:
306:
301:
296:
291:
285:
283:
279:
278:
275:
273:
272:
265:
258:
250:
244:
243:
236:
235:External links
233:
231:
230:
223:
196:
185:(3): 309–347.
169:
150:
148:
145:
114:Trafigura case
97:
96:
93:
89:
88:
84:
83:
78:
74:
73:
70:
66:
65:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
42:
37:
36:Full case name
33:
32:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
531:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
492:
491:
489:
478:
473:
471:
466:
464:
459:
458:
452:
450:
446:
442:
437:
434:
430:
425:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
371:
370:
366:
364:
363:
359:
357:
356:
352:
350:
349:
345:
343:
342:
338:
336:
335:
331:
329:
328:
324:
323:
321:
317:
311:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
286:
284:
280:
271:
266:
264:
259:
257:
252:
251:
248:
242:
239:
238:
234:
226:
220:
216:
212:
211:
206:
200:
197:
192:
188:
184:
180:
173:
170:
165:
161:
155:
152:
146:
144:
141:
139:
135:
134:Paul Farrelly
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
105:
104:
94:
92:Judge sitting
90:
85:
82:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:
52:
48:
44:
41:
38:
34:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
514:The Guardian
449:expanding it
438:
423:
367:
360:
354:
353:
346:
339:
332:
325:
209:
199:
182:
178:
172:
164:The Guardian
163:
154:
142:
130:The Guardian
129:
113:
108:
107:
102:
101:
100:
39:
15:
441:English law
289:Injunctions
282:Terminology
69:Cases cited
488:Categories
147:References
95:Maddison J
341:DFT v TFD
308:See also
138:WikiLeaks
118:Trafigura
391:See also
112:and the
54:Citation
46:Decided
221:
132:after
60:2540 (
443:is a
26:Court
445:stub
219:ISBN
58:EWHC
187:doi
490::
183:18
181:.
162:.
140:.
62:QB
476:e
469:t
462:v
451:.
269:e
262:t
255:v
227:.
193:.
189::
64:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.